Blog

  • The mane attraction: How many lions are in Australia and how well are they regulated? | Zoos

    The mane attraction: How many lions are in Australia and how well are they regulated? | Zoos

    Visitors seeking a “prey’s eye view” can get within “clawing range” of lions at one Australian zoo. Or they can experience the “thrill of a lifetime” by standing near enough to a lion to feel its breath as they pass meat through the fence with kitchen tongs. “Want to feed a lion by hand?” You can do that too if you find the right zoo. Visitors can pay $150 to place meat directly on their palm and feed it to a hungry lion through the bars.

    A visit to the zoo is usually considered a fun family day out, and lions are a popular drawcard. While details are not yet clear, the recent maiming of a woman related to the zoo owner in a staff-only area at Darling Downs zoo at the weekend has offered a stark reminder that lions are held in facilities across the country, and encounters with the apex predators can come with risk.

    Zoos can be an important part of conserving the lion as species, officially classed as “vulnerable”, but public fascination with the powerful big cats means they have been the centrepiece of zoos and public spectacle centuries before their status in the wild declined. Lions have been kept in captivity since the Roman empire, skulls belonging to lions have been unearthed in the Tower of London – believed to have been part of the royal menagerie 700 years prior – and in the 1800s live lions were shipped over the oceans to entertain the colonists in Australian zoos. Wallace, one of Melbourne Zoo’s first lions, was famous for his love of classical gramophone music.

    ‘When people think of zoos, they often think of the big cats – tigers and lions,’ says Dr Eduardo J Fernandez. Photograph: Australian Associated Press/Alamy

    Today these kings of the jungle can be found at wildlife parks dotted around Australia – from the famous big city zoos and their open air counterparts to the south coast of New South Wales, the Darling Downs of Queensland and the Victorian Alps. Which begs the question – just how many lions are there in Australia? And how well are the facilities they are kept in being regulated?

    ‘You obviously have to maintain safety’

    “When people think of zoos, they often think of the big cats – tigers and lions,” says Dr Eduardo J Fernandez, animal behaviour program director at the University of Adelaide and an expert in the family felidae, which includes the big cats.

    There are about 100 lions in Australian zoos, according to Zoos and Aquarium Association Australasia (ZAAA), along with other big cats.

    Fernandez says standards and protocols – like those covered by the ZAAA accreditation – are critical for both animal welfare and safety, particularly for “any animal that poses potential danger”, which is every species of big cat.

    Accreditation for ZAAA, is a self-assessment process. There are now between 75 and 80 accredited operations in Australia, but ZAAA estimates about 200 licensed animal facilities in the country, which range from wildlife shelters and hospitals to zoos, wildlife parks and aquariums.

    “The better zoos in Australia will be part of the [ZAAA] accreditation scheme,” says Assoc. Prof Alex Whittaker, an animal welfare law expert at the University of Adelaide.

    However, she says, national species-specific regulation or guidance is limited. And while national standards for the care of exhibited animals were endorsed by governments in 2019, they have not yet been adopted across all jurisdictions.

    Research shows the public prefers to see animals kept in modern enclosures with naturalistic exhibits. Photograph: Cameron Spencer/Getty Images

    The rules and oversight of facilities keeping dangerous animals varies by state and territory. In addition to its own zoo-specific laws, NSW sets minimum standards for exhibiting carnivores, including specifications for lion enclosures – fences at least 4.5m in height with 5mm mesh. Similar, but slightly different, rules apply in Victoria.

    Will Meikle, a zoo animal welfare expert was involved in developing NSW laws and standards that regulate the keeping of exotic animals. “From a physical perspective, you obviously have to maintain safety of staff and visitors to the facilities and ensure that the animals are able to be safely held in captivity that they’re not going to escape.”

    But, even carefully designed enclosures aren’t impenetrable. In 2022, five lions escaped their enclosure at Sydney’s Taronga zoo, forcing visitors to hide in safe zones and triggering a review of zoo safety. Later, footage showed the animals managed to scratch and break through a security fence.

    ‘People want to feed the animals’

    Many zoo websites – from large, publicly funded institutions to small regional wildlife parks – promote paid encounters offering the chance to “hand feed” lions and other dangerous carnivores. Such closeup encounters are common at zoos worldwide and considered safe, with 75% offering some sort of human-animal experience, according to a 2019 study.

    “There’s a real interest by people who want to feed the animals,” says Meikle. “If people can’t feed the animals, they want to see somebody feeding the animals, and they want to interact with the animals as much as they can.” These sorts of experiences would usually be covered by an internal operating procedure rather than regulation, he says.

    Fernandez, who has written a book on zoo animal-visitor interactions, says these could be positive from a welfare perspective, but their outcomes are rarely assessed.

    “It’s critical that we evaluate the impact, because there are many instances of different types of interactions that can be good for the welfare of the animal [and] be enriching. But there’s also many instances, historically, that have been detrimental.”

    skip past newsletter promotion

    And there is evidence the public is deeply concerned about animal wellbeing.

    In 2020-21, researcher Dr Janice Vaz surveyed 375 people, including 164 Australians, for their views on big cats in zoos.

    She found the public preferred to see animals kept in modern enclosures with naturalistic exhibits, suggesting a deeper concern for animal welfare and generally disapproved of direct interactions like feeding or playing with clubs.

    Zoos use enrichment activities to mimic aspects of foraging behaviours, says Fernandez. Photograph: Imago/Alamy

    “It can be a hard task even for people caring for their own house cats to get right, let alone trying to meet the needs of a wild, 130kg+ carnivore,” says feline behaviour researcher, Julia Henning.

    “Lions have evolved to be excellent hunters, and this behaviour is hard wired into them. This means that it is not enough to simply provide them with food, they require an ability to express the behaviours they would usually associate with the food such as hunting, stalking and ambushing.”

    Zoos use enrichment activities to mimic aspects of foraging behaviours, like carcass feeding, says Fernandez, but constantly evaluating and adapting practices is essential.

    There are limitations, and huge variation in the quality of the environment and enrichment provided. Recreating the natural environment is ideal, but a challenge. Fernandez says generally, as lions are a social species, it is good to have a pride of lions held together. In the wild, a lion’s home range might extend to 10,000 hectares. The largest enclosure in Australia, at South Australia’s Monarto Safari Park, is 11-hectares, while the minimum size in Victoria and NSW is 200 to 300 metres-square.

    ‘Inherent risks’

    Incidents, while extremely rare, do occur.

    “There are inherent risks when working with wildlife and certain behaviours can be unpredictable, however zoos and aquariums have policies in place to minimise these risks,” a ZAAA spokesperson says. “The sector is continuously improving its standards, and incidents like this [the 6 July incident] will be followed with careful review.”

    A Biosecurity Queensland spokesperson says authorised animal exhibitors are expected to manage risks with exhibited animals, and the department was “working to gather further information related to the incident”. Workplace Health and Safety Queensland is also investigating.

    All incidents should provoke “deep consideration” of how we “house, treat and interact with animals in our care”, says Henning.

    “It should prompt zoos and other organisations to question the need for their encounters.”

    Continue Reading

  • Wimbledon 2025: Where Amanda Anisimova v Iga Swiatek final will be won or lost

    Wimbledon 2025: Where Amanda Anisimova v Iga Swiatek final will be won or lost

    Both players are understandably going to be nervous coming into the match – it’s the Wimbledon final! The outcome will likely come down to who manages the occasion better.

    Anisimova was pretty nervous in her quarter-final win against Anastasia Pavyluchenkova, to the point where she kept dropping to the floor on her haunches in the last couple of games – even when it wasn’t match point.

    It was an illustration of the feeling of desperation she was facing as she edged closer to victory.

    We saw similar reactions a few times early on in the semi-final against Aryna Sabalenka too but she managed to settle more as the match went on.

    Swiatek, having won majors and having been the world number one for such a long time, has the edge in terms of experience – that absolutely counts for a lot.

    But Anisimova has nothing to lose. Of course she is desperate to win the Wimbledon final, but at the start of the fortnight she would never have thought she would actually be here in the championship match.

    She can close her eyes in the final and have a swing – which fits best into what she does. This circumstances allows her to be more dangerous.

    So she can go out there and play freely, whereas I think Swiatek might feel extra pressure.

    Swiatek has never won the singles title here, she’s the higher ranked and many people will expect her to lift the trophy.

    I think being the underdog favours Anisimova and it fits in well with her aggressive game style.

    Continue Reading

  • State Department is firing more than 1,300 staff on Friday, internal memo says

    State Department is firing more than 1,300 staff on Friday, internal memo says



    CNN
     — 

    The State Department began firing more than 1,300 people on Friday as part of a dramatic overhaul of the agency, according to a State Department official.

    The firings will affect 1,107 civil service and 246 foreign service officers in Washington, DC, an internal notice seen by CNN said. It comes as the State Department implements a drastic reorganization as part of the Trump administration’s broader efforts to shrink the federal government.

    Those fired on Friday worked on issues like countering violent extremism; helping Afghans who fled after the Taliban takeover; educational exchanges; and issues related to women’s rights, refugees and climate change.

    Hundreds of offices and bureaus are being eliminated or altered as a result of the restructuring that began to be implemented on Friday. The layoff notices, issued via email, came out as Secretary of State Marco Rubio was of Washington, DC, on a flight back from an overseas trip to Malaysia.

    “Nearly 3,000 members of the workforce will depart as part of the reorganization,” the notice said. That number includes people who are being fired as well as those leaving voluntarily.

    As the layoffs happened Friday, notes of support popped up around the halls of the Washington, DC, headquarters, thanking fired employees for their service. Signs calling on remaining colleagues to “resist fascism” and “remember the oath you vowed to uphold” were also seen in the building.

    At the end of the day, employees lined around the entrance lobby and the sidewalks outside of the State Department to “clap out” their fired coworkers. Those who lost their jobs emerged from the building, some crying, some holding boxes, to steady applause from colleagues and a growing crowd of supporters and demonstrators gathered for a rally outside.

    “These firings were not done with dignity and respect, but I have walked out of the State Department with my head held high, alongside my civil service and foreign service colleagues,” said Olga Bashbush, a career diplomat who was fired Friday. She told CNN she had served as a diplomat for 20 years and just happened to have started last October in an office in DC that is being eliminated.

    “Without our diplomacy professionals, we are going to have those forever wars that Congress and the United States and the president have said that they don’t want to be in,” she said. “We are here to serve and protect, and I’m still willing to serve and all of my colleagues here today are willing to serve.”

    Former State Department officials and Democratic lawmakers who spoke at the rally condemned the firings, echoing that they will take a toll at a time when the role of diplomats and foreign affairs experts is particularly important as the Trump administration tries to broker ends to wars in Ukraine and the Middle East.

    They also leveled sharp criticisms of the broader reorganization, which includes sweeping changes to focus on the Trump administration’s priorities, such as reducing immigration to the US and promoting the administration’s worldview, with less emphasis on protecting and promoting human rights across the globe.

    Trump administration officials have defended the reorganization, arguing it was necessary to make the “bloated” agency more effective and aligned with the president’s priorities.

    “In connection with the Departmental reorganization first announced by the Secretary of State on April 22, 2025, the Department is streamlining domestic operations to focus on diplomatic priorities,” Friday’s notice said.

    “Headcount reductions have been carefully tailored to affect non-core functions, duplicative or redundant offices, and offices where considerable efficiencies may be found from centralization or consolidation of functions and responsibilities,” it said.

    Foreign service officers who are given “Reduction in Force” (RIF) notices on Friday will be placed on administrative leave for 120 days before formally losing their jobs, according to the notice. Most civil servants will be placed on leave for 60 days before their firing takes effect, the notice said.

    Rubio on Thursday said the reorganization was being implemented in “probably in the most deliberate way of anyone that’s done one.”

    A senior State Department official, when asked for an estimate of how much money the firings would save taxpayers, could not provide a specific answer but said the budget request for the next fiscal year “reflects substantial savings.”

    The official said the RIF plan “looked at the functions that were being performed, not at individuals.”

    “If a particular function was being performed that was no longer aligned with what the department was going to be doing going forward, that function was being eliminated,” the official said Thursday. “It was personnel agnostic.”

    The firings are impacting both members of the civil and foreign service in Washington, DC. Foreign service officers are often highly trained, speak multiple languages, and serve around the world on behalf of the US. If they were working in a now-eliminated office on May 29, the day Rubio approved the reorganization plan, they may be cut.

    There aren’t plans for cuts at overseas posts as of now, the senior State Department official said.

    “In less than six months, the U.S. has shed at least 20 percent of its diplomatic workforce through shuttering of institutions and forced resignations,” a statement from the American Foreign Service Association said Friday.

    “There were clear, institutional mechanisms available to address excess staffing, if that had been the goal. Instead, these layoffs are untethered from merit or mission,” the statement said. “They target diplomats not for how they’ve served or the skills they have, but for where they happen to be assigned. That is not reform.”

    “We stand with the entire State Department workforce and with every American who understands that professional, non-partisan diplomacy is not expendable. It is essential,” it said.

    This story has been updated with additional reporting.

    CNN’s Dalia Abdelwahab and Scott Pisczek contributed to this report.

    Continue Reading

  • BBC faces dilemma over new series of MasterChef

    BBC faces dilemma over new series of MasterChef

    Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock A picture of Gregg Wallace in a dark suitKen McKay/ITV/Shutterstock

    Gregg Wallace has been the face of MasterChef for 20 years

    Gregg Wallace may have been sacked as MasterChef presenter after allegations of misconduct, but for the BBC there’s still a decision to be made over this year’s series.

    It is widely reported to have been filmed in 2024 – with Wallace in it – before BBC News first revealed the allegations against him.

    The BBC, for its part, is staying tight-lipped about what it will do.

    The corporation has said it won’t comment until an inquiry into the allegations, ordered by MasterChef’s production company Banijay, is complete and the findings are published.

    Wallace has apologised for using “inappropriate” language, but has said the report will clear him of “the most serious and sensational allegations”.

    ‘Tough decision’

    The BBC will face an “extremely tough decision” about what to do with the unseen series, according to Max Goldbart, international TV editor at Deadline.

    “They’re damned if they do show it, and damned if they don’t,” he says. “There are lots of competing objectives they’ll be thinking about, and those conversations will be happening right now.”

    On the one hand, the BBC could go ahead and broadcast it as planned. But this week, BBC News reported that 50 more people have come forward with fresh allegations of inappropriate comments, touching and groping – which Wallace denies. BBC News is editorially independent of the wider corporation.

    Regardless of what the Banijay report concludes, Goldbart says it would be “very awkward” for the latest series to be beamed into people’s living rooms for weeks on end.

    “There could be a backlash,” he says. “Not to mention how upsetting that might be for the women who’ve come forward with claims about him.”

    One former MasterChef worker, who says Wallace pulled his trousers down in front of her, tells me it would show “a real lack of respect” to people like her if the series was aired.

    Another, who says he planted a kiss on her forehead, says she would feel “disappointed and let down”, and as if her experiences were being disregarded.

    But shelving the cooking show is not an easy decision either – and not only because it could cause uproar among fans.

    For the production crew, who spent many weeks working on it, it is a waste of their time and efforts. And for the chefs who have taken part in it the latest amateur series, it would clearly also be deeply disappointing.

    Irini Tzortzoglou, who won the 2019 competition, tells me that for her, the experience was “life-changing”.

    She has gone on to judge awards, host retreats, and work as an olive oil sommelier, and says she is busier now than ever.

    “I can’t imagine what it would be like for people who’ve waited all this time, biting their nails, only to be told that no-one is going to see your achievements, your stresses, your growth. It would be awful.”

    iPlayer option

    Thomasina Miers, who won the first series of MasterChef in 2005 and went on to co-found the Wahaca chain of Mexican restaurants, echoes her views.

    “[Being on MasterChef] was great, it got me working in food, and I haven’t looked back,” she says. “It would be mad if they don’t show it. It’s a lot expecting people to turn up every day, give up their lives and income and not get paid, for it not to go out.”

    A third option could be to put it on BBC iPlayer so it’s available for MasterChef fans to opt in to stream, but isn’t being actively pushed out on primetime TV.

    Other broadcasters have done similar things before.

    In 2021, ITV decided to pull the final episode of drama Viewpoint after allegations of sexual harassment were made in The Guardian against its star, Noel Clarke.

    Clarke denies the allegations and is awaiting the result of his libel case against The Guardian.

    The finale of Viewpoint was made available on the broadcaster’s streaming service for a limited time, for any viewers who wished to seek it out.

    Goldbart says he can see the appeal of the iPlayer option.

    “It’s a lot easier to bury stuff on on-demand than on linear TV,” he says, although he points out that there might be financial implications.

    But Dorothy Byrne, former head of news and current affairs at Channel 4, says even that option presents challenges.

    “If they think the person’s unacceptable, then I can’t see how putting it on iPlayer gets around that issue,” she tells me. “I would say on balance they can’t show it at all, but I hope there’s a way they can ensure all those people who took part in it don’t lose out on this opportunity, because I really feel sorry for them.

    “Perhaps there is a way they could edit him out in a way that still allows it to be shown.”

    BBC/Shine A picture of Gregg WallaceBBC/Shine

    The BBC found itself in a similar predicament in November, when the allegations against Wallace first surfaced.

    At the time, the corporation made the decision to pull the Christmas specials of MasterChef, although the most recent series of MasterChef: The Professionals did continue to air.

    “MasterChef is life-changing for the chefs that take part and the show is about more than one individual,” a BBC source said at the time.

    The difference this time is that we’re not halfway through a series – and that makes the decision even harder.

    What no-one seems to be questioning, though, is the long-term future of the show.

    Earlier this week, Banijay held a dinner for journalists and media industry people.

    The timing of the event, just hours after Wallace dropped a lengthy statement in advance of the Banijay report, was no doubt uncomfortable (one of the people there describes it to me as akin to “a wedding where the bride or groom had done a runner”).

    But that same person tells me Banijay executives spoke about MasterChef and its new base in Birmingham, demonstrating their commitment to it.

    When the Birmingham move was announced a few years ago, the BBC renewed the show through to 2028.

    And food critic Grace Dent has already stepped in to host the next series of Celebrity MasterChef, indicating that version is also continuing.

    “It’s not one of those shows which is defined by its presenter,” Goldbart says. “I personally feel it can continue. John Torode is very good, Grace Dent has filled in a lot, and it’s one of those rare beasts where the viewing figures on linear [TV] have held up.”

    But for the current series, a decision will need to be taken soon.

    “They’ll need to make an announcement when the report comes back for the sake of the wonderful people who took part,” says Byrne.

    “This isn’t one of those things where you can endlessly delay.”


    Continue Reading

  • State Bank injects Rs1.7tr via dual OMOs

    State Bank injects Rs1.7tr via dual OMOs

    Listen to article


    KARACHI:

    The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Friday injected a total of Rs1.72 trillion into the banking system through simultaneous conventional and Shariah-compliant open market operations (OMOs), aimed at addressing liquidity needs.

    Earlier on Wednesday, the government had borrowed Rs1.62 trillion through auctions of securities, with a substantial proportion of Rs1.413 trillion being raised from the Market Treasury Bills (MTBs) and Rs208.42 billion from the 10-year Pakistan Investment Bonds Floating Rate (PFL).

    The government is compelled to borrow from the private sector amid limits from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on borrowing directly from the central bank. Therefore, the central bank has to go through this cycle of injecting money through OMOs and then borrowing back from the private sector through securities to bridge the fiscal deficit of the government.

    According to official data, the SBP accepted bids worth Rs1.48 trillion under its conventional reverse repo operation, with a realised value of Rs1.43 trillion. The OMO included injections of Rs154.25 billion for seven-day tenor at a rate of return of 11.09% and Rs1.32 trillion for 14-day tenor at 11.07%, with 24 bids accepted out of 27 received.

    In parallel, the central bank conducted a Mudarabah-based Shariah-compliant OMO, where it injected an additional Rs243 billion, with a realised value of Rs244.9 billion. The Islamic OMO consisted of Rs40 billion accepted for seven days at a rate of 11.13% and Rs203 billion for 14 days at 11.12%. All three bids received were accepted, reflecting growing market interest in Shariah-compliant instruments.

    The cumulative injection of liquidity comes at a time when the SBP has been easing monetary conditions, having recently cut the policy rate amid a downward trend in inflation. The strong demand for 14-day funds in both OMOs highlights banks’ preference for locking in medium-term liquidity, possibly in anticipation of further monetary easing.

    Furthermore, the rupee posted a marginal gain against the US dollar on Friday, appreciating by 0.04% in the inter-bank market. By the end of trading, the rupee closed at 284.46, marking an improvement of 10 paisa compared to Thursday’s closing rate of 284.56.

    Meanwhile, gold prices in Pakistan climbed sharply on Friday, tracking gains in the international market, where the yellow metal surged over 1% to a more than two-week high. The rally was driven by renewed safe-haven demand after President Donald Trump reignited trade tensions by announcing fresh tariffs, escalating fears of a global trade war.

    In the domestic market, the price of gold per tola rose Rs2,300 to settle at Rs357,000, according to data released by the All Pakistan Sarafa Gems and Jewellers Association. Similarly, the rate for 10 grams of gold increased Rs1,971 to Rs306,069.

    This follows Thursday’s sharp uptick of Rs3,200 per tola, when gold closed at Rs354,700.

    Globally, spot gold was up 1.2% to $3,363.46 per ounce by 11:32 am EDT (1532 GMT), its highest since June 24. US gold futures gained 1.6% to $3,377.80, according to Reuters.

    Adnan Agar, Director at Interactive Commodities, explained the international trend, saying: “Gold touched a low of $3,322 and a high of $3,368 today (Friday) and is trading around $3,355. Renewed tariff threats from Trump have triggered another wave of buying in gold.”

    He noted that unless a breakthrough occurs in trade negotiations after August 1, gold is expected to continue trading within a range of $3,270 to $3,420. “If tariffs persist beyond August, we could see further upside. Otherwise, history shows that Trump often backtracks or secures last-minute deals, which could cap gold’s rise,” Agar added.

    Continue Reading

  • Regulating the Crypto Market in Nigeria – International Monetary Fund (IMF)

    1. Regulating the Crypto Market in Nigeria  International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    2. IMF flags cross-border crypto risks for Nigeria as global market surges 1,511% in five years  Nairametrics
    3. SEC, Quidax partner for landmark finance conference  The Guardian Nigeria News
    4. Digital Assets Adoption in Nigeria’s Capital Market: Imperative for Asset Management  Proshare
    5. Fintechs can grow Nigeria’s retail investor base tenfold in five years — Sycamore MD  Business News Nigeria

    Continue Reading

  • Businessmen slam punitive laws

    Businessmen slam punitive laws

    Listen to article


    ISLAMABAD:

    Pakistan’s leading business chambers on Friday asked the government to immediately suspend the laws that authorise the arrest of taxpayers on allegations of fraud and penalise the use of cash for over Rs200,000 worth of business transactions or else they will begin an agitation campaign.

    The demands were made from the platform of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) in the presence of Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani and members of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).

    Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb did not attend the FPCCI meeting, where representatives of almost all the chambers and associations were present.

    The business community wants the immediate withdrawal of the FBR’s authority to arrest people on allegations of fraud, powers to add back 50% of cash expenditure above Rs200,000 in income and depute taxmen in factories, said FPCCI President Atif Ikram Sheikh.

    Sheikh demanded that the FBR’s discretion to determine input adjustment and the enforcement of electronic invoicing should also be suspended.

    The government has taken these measures to minimise the use of cash in the economy and to crack down on tax fraud.

    “A thief will be called a thief but we will ensure that the law is not wrongly applied,” said Minister of State Bilal Kayani while responding to demands from the business community. He stressed that those powers could not be suspended until the law was amended by parliament.

    “We may not agree with everything that the business community has demanded but discussions will continue in the coming days,” said Kayani while indicating the government’s resolve to withstand the pressure from the traders and business leaders.

    The easiest thing was that the government should have left the arrest powers in the hands of assistant commissioners but it introduced safeguards in it, said the minister of state. He added that the explanatory memorandum on budget would be issued on coming Tuesday, which should address some of their concerns.

    The FPCCI president said that the business community wanted to resolve the issue through negotiations but other participants of the meeting threatened to go on strike from July 19 if those powers were not withdrawn.

    Kayani said that there were many businesses that did formal transactions but there were others that dealt in cash and those should not be rewarded.

    According to new Section 21S and Q of the Income Tax Ordinance, 50% of the expenditure claimed in respect of sales, where the taxpayer received payment exceeding Rs200,000 otherwise than through a banking channel or digital means against a single invoice containing one or more than one transactions of supply of goods or provisions of services will be treated as income.

    Section 21(q) states that 10% of the claimed expenditure attributable to purchases made from persons who are not National Tax Number (NTN) holders shall be disallowed.

    These steps are taken to discourage the use of cash in business transactions.

    “People are extremely angry and it is getting difficult for us to control them,” warned FPCCI Patron-in-Chief SM Tanveer. He said that the economy was passing through a difficult phase for the past two years and the government had chosen to harass taxpayers in the middle of this.

    “We do not want a strike on July 19 but the message from the government is that the FBR is the new NAB,” said Sohail Altaf, a leading business leader from Rawalpindi. He warned that if the agitation began, it would be difficult for the government to reverse the negative perception.

    Saqib Fayyaz Chohan, another business leader, said that if the FBR did not withdraw the arrest powers and continued the implementation of e-invoicing, it would be difficult for them to move along.

    FBR Member Operations Hamid Ateeq Sarwar explained that those powers were only meant to be used against the people involved in tax fraud through fake sales tax invoices. He said that the adding-back income clause would also not impact return filing for tax year 2025 and any such question would be asked next year.

    Pakistan Vanaspati Manufacturers Association Chairman Sheikh Omar Rehan said that the FBR had deputed its staff in ghee factories that paid taxes at the import stage, urging them to withdraw the officers immediately.

    Sardar Tahir Iqbal, a representative of the real estate sector, said that the Capital Development Authority (CDA) chairman violated the prime minister’s instructions and increased transfer fee charges from Rs250 per yard to 3% of the property value. He said that this single increase denied the benefit of reduction in withholding tax rates for the buyers of properties.

    Ajmal Baloch, who claimed that he had support of 12.5 million traders, threatened to go on strike if the powers to arrest and add-back income were not withdrawn immediately.

    Continue Reading

  • 7 Little Words Hints, Clues And Answers For Saturday, July 12th

    7 Little Words Hints, Clues And Answers For Saturday, July 12th

    I thought I’d try out a new word puzzle to add to my list of games. I typically play Worlde, the Mini Crossword and Strands – all New York Times games – but there are so many out there. 7 Little Words crossed my path and I played today’s and enjoyed it quite a bit, so here’s a guide.

    The game is simple. You have a five-by-five grid of boxes, each containing a group of letters. Above this grid are seven phrases, each giving you a clue to seven words. The number of letters is listed next to each phrase. There is no time limit and no penalty for wrong answers. Solve each one in any order you please.

    The example given by the game is “deep fried treats” (6 letters) and the boxes that would create the word are DO + NU + TS for DONUTS. The game is played in UK English, so this could throw a little wrench into things for non-Brits.

    Play 7 Little Words right here.


    Here’s today’s grid:

    Play Puzzles & Games on Forbes

    Hints and Answers for today’s 7 Little Words

    Spoilers ahead!

    Here are the first letters of each corresponding word:

    1. soft toys = SQU

    2. irritation in one’s side = TH

    3. British actor Hugo = WEA

    4. celeb owned Welsh FC = WRE

    5. bowler by another name = DE

    6. sea off Papua New Guinea = BI

    7. Japanese style of painting = NI

    Now here are the full answers.

    1. soft toys = SQUISHIES

    2. irritation in one’s side = THORN

    3. British actor Hugo = WEAVING

    4. celeb owned Welsh FC = WREXHAM

    5. bowler by another name = DERBY

    6. sea off Papua New Guinea = BISMARCK

    7. Japanese style of painting = NIHONGA


    Some of these I had no clue on, which is why #4 was the last one I solved. Others were more apparent. I got SQUISHIES right away, and I’m very familiar with Hugo Weaving’s work (The Matrix, Lord Of The Rings, Slow Horses). I actually wasn’t aware that bowler’s were referred to as DERBY but it was a pretty straightforward guess. I also wasn’t sure about NIHONGA or the BISMARCK sea, so these took me a bit. A THORN in one’s side was straightforward enough, however. All told, a pretty fun little puzzle!

    Continue Reading

  • UAE assures easing Pak visa processing

    UAE assures easing Pak visa processing


    ISLAMABAD:

    The UAE has assured Pakistan of its “full support” in expediting visa processing for its citizens, particularly in the domain of work permits, as part of broader efforts to enhance bilateral ties in security and immigration affairs.

    This assurance came from UAE’s Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, Lieutenant General Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, during a meeting with Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi, who is currently in the Gulf country on an official visit.

    According to APP, the high-level meeting marked a key diplomatic exchange aimed at deepening cooperation in critical areas such as security, counter-narcotics and streamlined immigration protocols.

    Minister Naqvi was accorded a warm welcome upon arrival at the UAE Ministry of Interior, where he received a guard of honour. He was formally introduced to senior UAE officials before entering into extensive talks with his counterpart and other officials.

    A central focus of the discussions was the facilitation of visa processes for Pakistani nationals, especially those seeking employment opportunities in the UAE.

    Continue Reading

  • ATC rejects bail plea of PTI’s Qureshi

    ATC rejects bail plea of PTI’s Qureshi


    LAHORE:

    An anti-terrorism court (ATC) on Friday rejected post-arrest bail pleas of three top PTI leaders — Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Umar Sarftaz Cheema and Mian Mehmoodur Resheed — in a May 9, 2023 rioting case.

    ATC Judge Manzar Ali Gul delivered a decision after hearing arguments from both sides. The case related to arson and rioting outside Lahore’s Rahat Bakery and was registered by Sarwar Road Police Station.

    Qureshi serves as the PTI vice chairman while Cheema and Rasheed respectively served as Punjab governor and provincial minister during the PTI’s rule.

    Meanwhile, a trial court in Islamabad reserved its decision on a plea filed by Shah Mahmood Qureshi seeking acquittal in another May 9 case. Judicial Magistrate Shehzad Khan heard the case at the Islamabad District and Sessions Court.

    During the proceedings, Qureshi’s lawyer, Ali Bukhari, appeared before the court and argued that several co-accused have already been acquitted in the same case. He pointed out that on March 8, 2025, the court had acquitted other individuals involved in the matter.

    Bukhari maintained that Qureshi was accused of acting on a video message from PTI founder Imran Khan, which allegedly led to acts of vandalism. He requested the court to dismiss the charges against his client on similar grounds as those previously acquitted.

    Following the arguments, the court reserved its decision on Qureshi’s acquittal plea. The case was initially registered at Tarnol Police Station.

    Separately, the hearing of another case related to the Haqeeqi Azadi March, involving the PTI founder and party workers, could not proceed due to the unavailability of Imran Khan who has been detained at Rawalpindi’s Adiala Jail since September 2023.

    The court marked the attendance of the other accused and adjourned the proceedings without further developments. Advocate Masroof Khan appeared on behalf of PTI workers during the hearing.

    Continue Reading