Tiny bits of plastic no wider than a human hair have turned up in some unexpected places, including the human bloodstream.
Now, data presented at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology meeting shows that these fragments have breached the fluids that surround eggs and travel with sperm.
The research team led by Dr. Emilio Gómez‑Sánchez of Next Fertility Murcia in Spain scanned follicular fluid from 29 women and seminal fluid from 22 men.
The experts found microplastics in 69 percent of the women and 55 percent of the men they studied. According to Dr. Gómez‑Sánchez, the team was surprised to find that the particles were so widespread.
Plastics in human reproductive fluids
The study detected polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene and polypropylene, materials better known for slick frying pans and food packaging. Seeing them next to human eggs turns a theoretical hazard into a measurable one.
Back in 2021, Italian obstetricians spotted twelve plastic fragments in every placenta they examined, confirming that particles smaller than five millimeters can cross the maternal‑fetal boundary.
Similarly sized particles have been uncovered deep in lung tissue removed during surgery, proving that inhalation is a realistic delivery route for plastic dust.
Researchers in the Netherlands have even measured plastic mass circulating in human blood samples, an observation that explains how fragments migrate to distant tissues.
How plastics enter the human body
Most people take in plastic flecks by eating, drinking, or breathing, because everyday products shed invisible dust whenever they are heated, abraded, or exposed to sunlight.
Once swallowed or inhaled, particles small enough can slip through the gut wall or the thin air‑blood membrane in the lungs.
Animal studies suggest that fragments under one micrometer can enter cells directly, whereas larger shards get trapped in tissue and spark local irritation. Either way, they bypass the body’s usual waste filters.
Laboratory work on mice shows that digestive uptake rises when microplastics hitchhike on fats, a detail that matters for fertility research because reproductive hormones ride on similar lipid highways.
The overlap raises worry that plastics may act as endocrine mimics or carriers for other chemicals.
Dr. Gómez‑Sánchez’s team avoided laboratory contamination by collecting every human sample in glass vials and verifying the absence of background plastic. This means the polymers they found were genuine residents, not stray lab dust.
Plastic harms fertility
Mice exposed to polystyrene fragments shed sperm with damaged DNA and sluggish movement, effects traced to oxidative stress that overwhelms antioxidant defenses.
Separate work on rodent Leydig cells shows shriveled mitochondria after nanoplastic exposure, which throttles testosterone production and shrinks litter sizes.
Reviews published in 2024 concluded that microplastics can disrupt the hypothalamic‑pituitary‑gonadal axis, leading to hormonal imbalances and faulty egg maturation.
Because human oocytes develop over months, chronic exposure could matter more than a short spike. That makes the repeated detection of PTFE in both eggs and sperm especially noteworthy.
Plastic levels in eggs and sperm
In the current data set, PTFE appeared in 31 percent of sampled egg fluid and 41 percent of semen. PP ranked second among women and polystyrene second among men, with polyethylene terephthalate also present but in smaller numbers.
Annual plastic output has climbed from under two million tons in 1950 to about 460 million in 2019, a 230‑fold jump documented by the Minderoo‑Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
Each uptick in production increases litter, weathering, and fragment release, tightening the feedback loop between plastics and people. Reproductive cells, delicate by design, stand on the front line.
Gómez‑Sánchez reported that most reproductive samples contained only one or two plastic particles, amounts considered low compared with overall debris in the fluids. Yet fertility specialists note that even trace metals can derail embryo development, so particle counts alone may not predict risk.
Human fertility research must include plastics
“They should be considered an additional argument in favor of avoiding the generalized use of plastics in our daily lives,” said Professor Carlos Calhaz‑Jorge of the University of Lisbon. He also noted that further research is needed to prove causation.
The research team will now study hundreds of patients and link particle loads to embryo quality during in vitro fertilization cycles. Those correlations could supply the first direct human evidence beyond laboratory rodents.
They plan lifestyle questionnaires to test whether habits such as heavy bottled‑water use or microwaving food in plastic correlate with higher particle counts. The approach could convert abstract exposure theory into personal advice.
“Microplastics are just one variable in a complex equation,” said Dr. Gómez‑Sánchez. He urges moderation of plastic use rather than alarm.
Simple habits to lower exposure
Switching from plastic bottles to glass or stainless steel lowers ingestion because heat and time no longer leach particles from container walls. Replacing scratched nonstick pans can cut PTFE flakes in the diet.
Researchers advise skipping plastic cutting boards and using ceramic or bamboo instead, because knife action liberates shavings that cling to food. Letting take‑out cool before transferring it from polystyrene boxes also helps.
Air purifiers with HEPA filters capture airborne fibers shed by synthetic textiles, a step especially useful for nurseries. Regular vacuuming with a sealed system keeps particles from resuspending.
These tweaks are not foolproof, yet they come with side benefits like removing chemical additives that ride on plastic dust. They buy time while science sorts out the clinical stakes.
Efforts to cut human plastics pollution
Public‑health researchers argue that personal choices alone cannot outrun a supply chain making more than a billion pounds of new plastic every day.
Negotiators at the United Nations are hammering out a global treaty that could cap production and streamline recycling.
Dr. Philip Landrigan of Boston College calls the treaty a once‑in‑a‑generation chance to protect human health, because curbing output remains the only sure way to slow microplastic fallout. He points to the emerging fertility data as evidence that time is short.
Whether lawmakers act or not, the science of sub‑visible plastic is moving fast thanks to sharper imaging tools and nanomechanical sensors. Studies that once took months now finish in days, filling the literature with fresh clues.
Every new dataset sharpens the same picture: plastics weather into dust, the dust goes everywhere, and living tissue keeps no closed doors. Eggs and sperm, it turns out, are no exception.
The study is published in the journal Human Reproduction.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–
