Valtteri driving the W13 at the 2025 Goodwood Festival of Speed in July
Valtteri said: “I was fortunate enough to be in my debut season the last time F1 raced in South Korea back in 2013. The passion of the fans for our sport was clear and I thoroughly enjoyed the experience.
“To be able to bring F1 back to the country is brilliant; the team and I are determined to put on a great show for everyone that will be at the AMG Speedway next month for Peaches Run Universe 2025.”
Whilst the highlight of the event will be the demo run, fans will also be able to get up close and personal with Mercedes F1 memorabilia including helmets and overalls, plus try their hand on the team’s racing simulators with team merchandise available too.
Peaches will further amplify the excitement with rare vehicles rarely seen in the country including the legendary Mercedes-Benz 300 SL and the Mercedes-Benz SLR Stirling Moss, limited to just 75 units worldwide, an open-topped speedster created to honour racing legend Sir Stirling Moss, combining extreme rarity with iconic design and performance.
Further exhibits include former F1 cars from the Samsung Transportation Museum. The event will also feature celebratory performances by K-pop artists, special food and beverage offerings, and interactive experience zones.
Ticket information for ‘Peaches Run Universe’ will be released on September 18th at 1000 Korean Standard Time via KakaoTalk Gift, with sales starting on September 25th at 1600 Korean Standard Time.
Interview with Luis de Guindos, Vice-President of the ECB, conducted by Anja Ettel and Holger Zschäpitz
17 September 2025
President Donald Trump is openly attacking the independence of the US Federal Reserve. At the ECB, you are the highest level of protection when it comes to financial stability. How worried are you about events in the United States?
An independent central bank is the best protection against high inflation. Inflation expectations only stay low if investors and consumers trust the central bank to keep prices stable. Otherwise, there is a risk of a dangerous spiral of rising prices and wages. It’s particularly critical if monetary policy is constrained by fiscal policy – what we call fiscal dominance.
Yet your arguments don’t seem to be making much of an impression on Donald Trump.
My point is very clear. If governments interfere in monetary policy, it leads to inflation and increasing interest rates further down the road – this isn’t theoretical, it’s borne out by history.
How is the ECB preparing for this scenario?
What happens in the United States is very important to us – the US economy plays a central role on the global stage. But I don’t want to get involved in speculation about what might happen. What matters to us is the ECB’s legally guaranteed independence – and this remains valid.
The question is, for how long? France has a budget deficit of well over 6% for this year – a clear breach of EU rules. The Treaties seem to be losing their strength.
The situation isn’t comparable with what’s happening in the United States. The ECB isn’t being attacked politically. Our independent monetary policy plays a decisive role in the welfare of European citizens. And the best way for us to convince people is to fulfil our mandate: stable prices in Europe.
But what if government bond yields diverge in the euro area, as happened during the European sovereign debt crisis? Wouldn’t you have to intervene at that point, even if the monetary policy conditions speak against it?
For us, it’s completely clear that the European Treaties have priority. With regard to the current challenges – whether in the United States or elsewhere – we will do what we have to do to reach our goal of price stability. A central bank is not only independent on its own – it needs a stable political framework. France is not the only country subject to an excessive deficit procedure. Yet, it is specifically these rules that are crucial for sound fiscal conditions in Europe. With defence spending rising and other fiscal challenges, it is especially important to signal to financial markets that we will continue to be reliable when it comes to monetary policy. On yield spreads, yes, in some countries they have increased – but in others they have gone down again. This is often overlooked.
How worried are you about the situation in France? Could the problems be a catalyst for a new euro area crisis?
I’m not going to comment on any one particular country. Our call for stability applies equally to all euro area countries – especially in times of increasing global uncertainty.
Has the ECB’s Governing Council already discussed using the transmission protection instrument (TPI)? The instrument should enable the ECB to purchase government bonds if financing conditions in individual euro area countries worsen to an unjustifiable degree.
No. In the Governing Council, we discussed the TPI when we were setting it up three years ago, but since then we haven’t talked about it further – also not in the context of potentially using it in a particular country.
What exactly would cause you to use it? How big would the spread have to be for you to say “let’s go”?
The criteria are publicly accessible and clearly defined – anyone can read them for themselves. I won’t comment on any further details. What I can say is this. Financial markets, including sovereign bond markets, are calm and orderly. There are no signs of liquidity strains and, from our point of view, the spreads between sovereign bonds in the euro area are not a source of concern at the moment.
You were Minister of Finance in Spain for a long time and now you’ve been part of the ECB’s Governing Council for seven years. As you know both sides, do you ever ask yourself why EU Member States show so little European spirit?
Jean-Claude Junker comes to mind. He once said “We all know what to do, but we don’t know how to get re-elected once we have done it.” That captures it perfectly. Nevertheless, change is possible. Look at Portugal, Italy, Greece or my country Spain – compare ten, 15 years ago with today. These countries have overcome the crisis and are significantly stronger today – thanks to their reforms.
Not so difficult when you get billions in EU funding, like the Next Generation EU fund. Can you understand why people in Germany are frustrated?
I see it differently. European solidarity creates confidence in the financial markets and preserves stability. We all profit from that. If countries like Italy or Spain develop positively, that’s a win for German exports. And for context: Spain has received €40 billion in funding – with an annual GDP of €1.3 trillion. The Next Generation EU fund was helpful but not the decisive factor for success.
You talk of Spain’s successful transformation, yet the country has the highest unemployment rate in Europe. That doesn’t sound very successful.
Spain has two big strengths: a sound banking sector and a high level of competitiveness. Tourism has recovered since the end of the pandemic and the country benefits from a sizeable immigrant workforce, predominantly from Latin America. I won’t argue that EU funding wasn’t important. However, structural reforms played a much more decisive role. And yes, an unemployment rate of 10% is still too high. But that figure has already halved and is sinking further.
Europe has long relied on Germany’s strength. But now Germany itself is faltering and the Next Generation EU funding will end in 2028. Should these types of transfers continue on a permanent basis?
Solidarity must not be a one-way street, that is very clear. When countries make progress through mutual support, everyone benefits. But to do that, they also need to deliver: implement reforms, take responsibility. I’ve always agreed with my friend Wolfgang Schäuble on this matter. His idea of “tough love” applies more than ever: support, yes – but only under clear conditions.
And Germany?
I still clearly remember when Germany was labelled the “sick man of Europe”. But then, six years later, the country was once again an engine of growth. I have the utmost confidence in the German economy. Of course, there are challenges: Germany has relied on cheap energy from Russia for too long. And its current business model, with its focus on exports to the United States and China, faces challenges given the many trade disputes. However, with its additional public investment in infrastructure, Germany has taken an important step in the right direction – and I say this as someone who has been travelling through this country for nearly eight years. Germany will adapt to the new environment, and it’s doing so already.
Last week the ECB’s Governing Council decided not to lower interest rates. Markets are taking this to mean that rates won’t be reduced at all, neither this year nor next. Are they right?
There are two key takeaways from the meeting. First, we consider the current interest rate to be appropriate under the circumstances – based on inflation developments, our projections and the transmission of our monetary policy. Second, we are living in a very complex and uncertain world with numerous risks – from geopolitical tensions to trade issues, like those between China and the United States. This can alter trade flows, for example, through increased Chinese exports to Europe. Another point is consumption: despite rising real incomes, household consumption remains subdued.
Why is that?
It comes down to a certain lack of confidence in the future. Currently, unemployment is low, and the labour market is stable. But many households fear that, without fiscal consolidation, higher taxes may be on the horizon. That’s perhaps why consumption has been below what we expected.
Nevertheless, are the markets correct in their assessment?
Markets are not always wrong – but they’re not always right either. No one can predict the future with certainty. Markets tend to react with volatility; a central bank, however, cannot be volatile. That’s why we need to act with caution. And that’s exactly what we’re doing.
Is there a consensus of opinion on this within the Governing Council?
Thursday’s decision was unanimous. The ECB’s Governing Council consists of 26 members with different perspectives – but we all agree that we must keep all options open. If the situation changes, we will adjust our stance accordingly. And to be completely honest: if you find someone who can predict the next six months with certainty, we should hire them immediately.
Let’s talk about the blockchain revolution and digital money – areas where Europe risks falling behind once again. Will we see stablecoins in Europe or will we remain limited to the digital euro?
Stablecoins and the digital euro are not mutually exclusive. We’re not developing a digital euro because of stablecoins, but as a digital evolution of central bank money. The goal is a unified digital currency for Europe – like a banknote, but stored on a smartphone instead of in a wallet. This means it can also be used for e-commerce payments, where cash plays no role.
The decision on the digital euro will not come until 2026 or 2027 – but by then, it could be too late, as the tokenised world may already be dominated on the blockchain by the US dollar.
Europe should not be behind on this, but we first need a legal framework. I regret that the European Parliament won’t make its decision until May next year. As soon as the regulation is in place, the ECB is ready to swiftly introduce the digital euro. However, the time factor isn’t the only priority – the system must also be secure and stable. That’s what we are working on intensively.
What if a major stablecoin were to collapse tomorrow – would Europe be prepared for the consequences?
Stablecoins do not currently play a central role in Europe, and their market size is limited. Nevertheless, questions of financial stability do arise – particularly in the United States, where stablecoins are growing much more rapidly and are sometimes tied to bond portfolios. We need to monitor these developments on an international level. The stablecoin market is global, so regulation must also take a global approach. We need a coordinated legal framework and close cooperation between institutions to close regulatory gaps and create a level playing field.
If we talk again in ten years, what will we be discussing? Will everything be fine, with artificial intelligence and stable inflation, or will we be looking at a completely different Europe where the euro area might even be a thing of the past?
If you’re asking me on a personal level, I’d be very happy if Atlético Madrid finally won the Champions League! But on a serious note: I’ve spent many years working with the Eurogroup, the ECOFIN Council and now the ECB; I have been, and continue to be, part of this European community. My greatest wish is that populist movements in Europe do not prevail. That the European spirit remains strong enough to secure a united and stable Europe. And that we do everything in our power to make this goal a reality.
Marjan Rintel, CEO of KLM, states: “This flight tax makes the Netherlands the most expensive country in the European Union for air travel, no matter the distance. As a result, even more Dutch travelers are choosing to drive across the border to fly from airports in neighboring countries. This doesn’t help the climate—in fact, it actually undermines our ability to continue investing in cleaner and quieter aviation. The Netherlands is pricing itself out of the market. This puts pressure on our airline network and strikes at the heart of the Netherlands’ global connectivity.”
Leakage effect: travelers opt for foreign airports A further increase in the flight tax, as announced on Prince’s Day (Budget Day) with a projected revenue of around 1.1 billion euros per year from 2027 onward, will make flying from the Netherlands unaffordable for many Dutch travelers. A family with two children already pays €120 in flight tax per trip. In Belgium, the maximum flight tax per ticket is €10, Sweden is abolishing its flight tax, and Germany is even considering reversing its recent increase. Soon, a Dutch family of four will pay €200 in flight tax for a flight to Greece or Turkey. As a result, travelers are turning to airports across the border in Belgium or Germany, where the tax burden is lower.
Marjan Rintel warns for the consequences: “We see that passengers want to keep flying, but they are very price-sensitive. Since the introduction of the flight tax in 2021, the share of Dutch travelers flying from Düsseldorf and Brussels has already increased by 41% and 20%, respectively, between 2019 and 2024. Further increases in ticket prices—whether due to higher flight taxes or increased airport fees—will only accelerate the shift of travelers to airports abroad, such as Brussels and Düsseldorf.”
Flight tax as a driver for sustainability Currently, the proceeds from the flight tax go back into the national treasury and are not invested in making aviation more sustainable, such as by scaling up and making alternative fuels (SAF) more affordable. This is at odds with the wishes of nearly nine out of ten Dutch people, who believe the tax revenue should be used specifically to make flying more sustainable.
KLM is therefore advocating for a different approach. Marjan Rintel: “We should not keep piling on new taxes and extra costs here in the Netherlands. Instead, we need to invest together in cleaner aviation, for example by supporting alternative fuels (SAF). Right now, not a single cent of the tax revenue is going toward making aviation more sustainable. Families paying hundreds of euros in flight taxes should at least expect their money to actually contribute to lower emissions. Just as the government supports scaling up wind and solar energy or electrification of the vehicle fleet, it should also do more to make SAF production in the Netherlands available and affordable.”
Pakistan (PAK) will lock in with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in Match No. 10 of the ongoing Asia Cup 2025 at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium in Dubai on Wednesday, September 17. Notably, whoever is the winner of this fixture will progress to the Super Four.
Pakistan is coming off a crushing seven-wicket defeat to arch-rivals India. With just one win from two games, the Men in Green need to beat the UAE to keep their hopes alive. While they hold a net run-rate advantage thanks to their big win over Oman, they cannot afford another slip-up.
Meanwhile, the UAE recently defeated Oman, and a win against Pakistan would see them create history by advancing to the Super Four.
PAK vs UAE Match Details
Match
Pakistan vs United Arab Emirates, Match 10, Asia Cup 2025
Abu Dhabi has rewarded batters with intent in the Asia Cup so far, but the bowlers, too, have found help from the pitches. The forecast is for high temperatures. The average first-inning score at this venue has been around 135, and the team winning the toss will opt to bowl first
PAK vs UAE Head to Head
Matches Played
03
Won By Pakistan
03
Won By United Arab Emirates
00
Tied
00
First-Ever Fixture
February 29, 2016
Most-Recent Fixture
September 4, 2024
PAK vs UAE Predicted Playing XIs
Pakistan (PAK):
Sahibzada Farhan, Saim Ayub, Mohammad Haris(w), Fakhar Zaman, Salman Agha(c), Hasan Nawaz, Mohammad Nawaz, Faheem Ashraf, Shaheen Afridi, Sufiyan Muqeem, Abrar Ahmed
United Arab Emirates (UAE):
Alishan Sharafu, Muhammad Waseem(c), Muhammad Zohaib, Rahul Chopra(w), Asif Khan, Harshit Kaushik, Dhruv Parashar, Haider Ali, Muhammad Rohid Khan, Muhammad Jawadullah, Junaid Siddique
PAK vs UAE Probable Top Performers
Probable Best Batter: Litton Das
UAE skipper Muhammad Waseem could be the probable best batter in the upcoming game against Pakistan. Waseem has had a decent start to the Asia Cup as he has scored 88 runs in two innings at an average of 44.00. With the UAE having a big chance of qualifying for the next stage of the tournament, Waseem will need to once again produce a solid performance with the bat.
Probable Best Bowler: Junaid Siddique
UAE’s Junaid Siddique could be the best bowler in his team’s forthcoming game against Pakistan. The right-arm pacer will be looking to continue his fine form after bagging five wickets in two games. Siddique will be riding high on confidence after picking four wickets in the previous clash against Oman.
Your daily dose of cricket!
Today’s Match Prediction: Pakistan to win the match
Disclaimer: The prediction is based on the understanding, analysis, and instinct of the author. While making your prediction, consider the points mentioned and make your own decision.
Travel the universe with Dr. Ethan Siegel as he answers the biggest questions of all.
It’s hard to believe, but it’s now been 10 full years since the twin Advanced LIGO detectors — in Hanford, WA and Livingston, LA — were completed and turned on for the first time. Just days after they began operations, they saw the first-ever directly detected gravitational wave: GW150914, which signified the merger of two black holes. From across the Universe, a black hole of 36 times the mass of the Sun merged with another of 29 times the Sun’s mass, producing a remnant black hole of just 62 solar masses, with the other 3 solar masses getting converted into gravitational radiation via Einstein’s E = mc².
When those emitted waves arrived in each of the twin LIGO detectors, they changed the length of LIGO’s incredibly long, precise laser arms by less than the width of a single proton. Yet the signal was strong enough, and LIGO was sensitive enough, that those black hole properties could all be reconstructed, with the fact that the signals from both detectors matched showing that it wasn’t noise, it wasn’t an injected signal, and it wasn’t a fluke. For the first time in history, we had detected gravitational waves.
It’s now 10 years after that spectacular September 2015 event, and LIGO has just recently spotted a similar event: GW250114, from January of 2025. Unlike the first event, there’s so much more to learn from this one, showcasing just how far gravitational wave astronomy, driven by these world-class detectors, has come in such a short time.
An animated look at how spacetime responds as a mass moves through it helps showcase exactly how, qualitatively, it isn’t merely a sheet of fabric. Instead, all of 3D space itself gets curved by the presence and properties of the matter and energy within the Universe. Space doesn’t “change shape” instantaneously, everywhere, but is rather limited by the speed at which gravity can propagate through it: at the speed of light. The theory of general relativity is relativistically invariant, as are quantum field theories, which means that even though different observers don’t agree on what they measure, all of their measurements are consistent when transformed correctly.
Credit: LucasVB
It’s incredible to recognize how incredible detecting a gravitational wave at all actually is. When masses move through curved space — and in particular, space that’s been heavily distorted by the presence of another heavy, nearby mass — they experience something known as a radiation reaction. This was first worked out for electrically charged particles in an electromagnetic field, but it happens in gravitation, too, in exactly the same fashion. The fact that a mass, which itself distorts the fabric of space, moves through a region of space where the curvature is changing leads to the spontaneous emission of radiation: in this case, gravitational radiation. Because energy is conserved, and gravitational radiation (also known as a gravitational wave) carries energy, this leads to the decay of the mutual orbits of these masses.
For two comparable masses like black holes, this can lead to gravitational waves distorting the fabric of space by large amounts, with the size of the ripples in space decreasing the farther away one moves from the source: the masses that generate these ripples. By the time the ripples from GW150914 arrived at Earth, the size of those ripples, which translates into a quantity known as the strain amplitude for a gravitational wave detector, was down to 10-21, or one part in one sextillion. Remarkably, the advanced LIGO detectors were so sensitive that they could detect these tiny strain amplitudes, and not even “just barely,” but with an impressive signal-to-noise ratio of 26:1.
GW150914 was the first ever direct detection and proof of the existence of gravitational waves. The waveform, detected by both LIGO observatories, Hanford and Livingston, matched the predictions of general relativity for a gravitational wave emanating from the inward spiral and merger of a pair of black holes of around 36 and 29 solar masses and the subsequent “ringdown” of the single resulting black hole.
These black holes were kind of remarkable, in the sense that seeing merging black holes that were both this massive and also this close was an unlikely event, from a statistical perspective. That large-amplitude signal was fortuitous, as either a significantly smaller set of masses or a substantially greater distance to this merger would have led to a smaller strain amplitude, which would have been much more difficult — and, given LIGO’s initial capabilities, perhaps even impossible — to detect. It turned out we did get lucky with that very first detection, because it remained the signal with the largest strain amplitude ever seen for several years.
In those early days of Advanced LIGO, we only wound up seeing about one source per month of observing time, making it incredibly serendipitous to see one just days after turning the detectors on for the first time. But we wouldn’t have to rely on serendipity forever. The LIGO collaboration, thanks to outstanding planning, would periodically upgrade and refine their detector and its various components, increasing its sensitivity each time. Upgrades including:
improvements to the vacuum systems within the laser cavities, leading to the world’s most perfect vacuum in history,
cooling the mirrors to reduce noise with each reflection, while maximizing and enhancing the reflectivity of those mirrors,
improving the observatory’s resistance to seismic noise, where the limit is now set by the fact that the Earth has ever-present tectonic plates,
and squeezing the quantum states, in a frequency-dependent way, of the laser light that’s used to measure and detect the incoming gravitational waves.
Within LIGO’s vacuum chamber, laser light is now created in not only a squeezed fashion, but where quantum squeezing occurs in a frequency-dependent fashion. The squeezer is operational in this photo, as green laser light is being pumped through it.
Credit: Georgia Mansell/LIGO Hanford Observatory
Whereas LIGO was initially detecting about one gravitational wave event per month, improvements in both its sensitivity and its range have led to it now detecting events approximately ten times as frequently: about once every three days. A tenfold improvement in detection sensitivity, with the same basic infrastructure, is an unheard-of level of advancement in a scientific endeavor such as this. These incremental improvements, conducted during the downtime in between various data-taking runs, have enabled LIGO to increase its haul of merging black holes from that first event, seen in 2015, to hundreds of events as of 2025. In fact, during the first period of the fourth observing run (known as O4A), LIGO saw more gravitational wave events than from all previous observing runs combined.
Still, that first event, GW150914, still held the record for the largest strain amplitude ever seen even though all of these advances. In every gravitational wave event where two black holes merge, there are three separate phases to probe:
the inspiral phase, where the masses get closer and closer due to orbital decay from the emission of gravitational waves,
the merger phase, where black holes go from having two separate event horizons to having one unified horizon that enshrouds both objects,
and the ringdown phase, where the now-merged black holes settle down into their final, equilibrium state.
Although it’s the inspiral phase that enables us to detect these binary black hole mergers, because there’s so much signal that builds up over many orbits, it’s the ringdown phase, or that post-merger phase, that enables us to probe some of the most important aspects of General Relativity itself.
This illustration maps out the various stages of a supermassive black hole merger, and the expected signals that scientists believe will emerge as the event unfolds. Once the two pre-merger black holes pass within the same event horizon, no further gravitational waves get emitted, save for the “ringdown” phase due to the changing shape of the post-merger event horizon. During the inspiral and merger phases, however, gravitational wave signals are the easiest to detect.
Credit: ESA – S. Poletti
The key to understanding why the ringdown phase is so important is to recognize that, in Einstein’s General Relativity, there are only three factors that determine the equilibrium state, shape, and size of a black hole’s event horizon: mass, electric charge, and spin. For any isolated, stationary black hole, these three parameters determine all of the properties of a realistic black hole’s event horizon. If we ignore electric charge, which is expected to be negligible for most physically real black holes (because matter is, overall, electrically neutral), then we can look to Roy Kerr’s famed 1963 paper — where he detailed what’s now known as the Kerr metric — for the exact solution for a spinning, massive black hole in spacetime.
But a just-merged pair of black holes isn’t in this ideal, equilibrium state quite yet. It has to go from its initial configuration into that equilibrium state, and that’s what the ringdown phase actually is. When you measure and detect those tiny, post-merger spacetime ripples, you’re seeing how the black hole goes from that post-merger state to its equilibrium state, enabling you to confirm that these post-merger black holes do indeed evolve rapidly into that Kerr state. However, those ringdowns, if we can measure them well enough, can go a step farther: they can test the Hawking area theorem for black holes, which asserts that if you have two black holes that merge, the area of the final, post-merger black hole must be greater than or equal to the sum of the pre-merger black hole areas, individually.
Encoded on the surface of the black hole can be bits (or quantum bits, i.e., qubits) of information, proportional to the event horizon’s surface area. When two black holes merge, there is a theorem from Stephen Hawking, sometimes known as the second law of black hole mechanics, that states that the post-merger area must always be greater than or equal to the sum of the pre-merger areas, with strong implications for entropy and thermodynamics.
Credit: T.B. Bakker/Dr. J.P. van der Schaar, Universiteit van Amsterdam
That theorem, devised by Stephen Hawking way back in 1971, has profound implications. Because black holes have entropies that are defined by their areas, the Hawking area theorem is an important manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics: the law that says that the entropy of any closed, isolated system can only increase, never decrease, over time. When two black holes merge, that ringdown signal can be used to determine the area of the post-merger event horizon. Although a range of area increases are allowed, the lower bound is an increase 0, and the upper bound is three times the initial area. Anything outside of that range would violate Hawking’s area theorem.
Back in 2021, a team of researchers attempted to test Hawking’s area theorem with the then-strongest signal yet detected by LIGO: GW150914. Our very first gravitational wave event of all was still, even years later, the strongest gravitational wave black hole-black hole merger signal we had yet seen, and yet they were only able to gather weak (two-sigma, or about 95% confidence) evidence supporting the area law. What they were seeing was consistent with General Relativity and our most vaunted theoretical predictions, but the data wasn’t quite good enough to confirm it with the needed degree of confidence.
The raw data (gray points) and the reconstructed inspiral, merger, and ringdown signals (red and blue curves) are shown for each of the twin LIGO detectors in Hanford, WA and Livingston, LA respectively. This data makes GW250114 the most exquisite strong-field test of General Relativity ever observed in nature.
Credit: A.G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Physical Review Letters, 2025
That’s where the new gravitational wave event GW250114 comes into play. Physically, the event was very similar to the first gravitational wave event ever observed: two black holes, of around 30 solar mases each, inspiraled and merged together from around a billion light-years away. The gravitational waves showed up in the detector with a strain amplitude of around 10-21: huge for gravitational waves, but tiny on an absolute scale. But, as the researchers from the key paper were quick to point out, “thanks to the LIGO detectors now operating near their design sensitivity, it registers at a signal-to-noise ratio of 80, as opposed to 26 for GW150914 a decade ago.”
That’s more than a factor of three in improvement of the signal strength over just 10 years, which enables a much more confident and robust extraction of the key parameters and properties associated with this merger. You can see evidence of this increased sensitivity in the event’s waveform, above, in which you can see how well the data matches each of the theoretical curves for the inspiral, merger, and ringdown portions of the merger event. You can also see, from the graph below, how improved the mass of the two merging objects is between the 2025 event (blue) compared to the 2015 event (gray). The improvement is entirely due to upgrades and improvements to LIGO’s sensitivity.
This comparison graph shows the black hole masses of GW150914 and GW250114, respectively. Although the masses and distances of the merging black holes were comparable, the confidence in narrowing down what the masses were, as shown from the gray and blue bumps, respectively, showcases just how significantly improved LIGO’s detectors are today versus ten years ago.
Credit: A.G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Physical Review Letters, 2025
When two black holes coalesce and merge, they aren’t yet in that ideal, stable configuration that is the hallmark of a realistic black hole: a Kerr black hole for a rotating black hole, or a Schwarzschild black hole for the non-rotating case. (All observed black holes, thus far, are thought to be rotating.) That final phase of gravitational wave emission is known as the ringdown phase because of its similarity to what happened to a bell when it’s struck with a mallet, clapper, or a jacquemart. A struck bell will ring, and that ringing will create overtones: not just ringing at a single frequency, but at multiple frequencies, that all decay away over time.
That’s what the “ringdown” phase of a gravitational wave merger is like: just milliseconds after the two black holes merge, they begin exhibiting a “fundamental mode” of ringing, plus detectable overtones that are like resonant, higher frequency vibrations that are related to the fundamental mode. For GW250114, they were able to detect both the fundamental mode and the first overtone in the ringdown data, and having both of those enabled the researchers to perform a key test: is the post-merger remnant Kerr-like in nature? As you can see from the figure below, lifted from their paper, the observed gravitational wave spectrum (orange and green contours) are highly consistent with the Kerr spacetime (gray shaded region), which is precisely what theory predicts. The best-fit point, marked with a black X, lies exactly within the preferred region.
Is the post-merger black hole formed from the gravitational wave event GW250114 Kerr-like in nature? An assessment of the ringdown’s fundamental frequency plus the first overtone (green and orange) show that it is consistent with Kerr’s predictions (gray band), with the best-fit point (black X) falling exactly in line with predictions.
Credit: A.G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Physical Review Letters, 2025
But then we come to Hawking’s area law, which is sometimes known as the second law of black hole mechanics: that the black hole horizon area cannot decrease in time. It declares that, for:
any two black holes that spin in any fashion, a maximum of 50% of the initial energy can be gravitationally radiated away,
and for two black holes that aren’t spinning at all, a maximum of 29% of the initial energy can be gravitationally radiated away.
As long as we aren’t creating matter or electromagnetic radiation out of nothing (i.e., via Hawking radiation), as long as the objects are actual black holes and not naked singularities, and as long as the laws of General Relativity describe the Universe, these conditions cannot be violated.
Therefore, if we can measure the area of the post-merger object, it serves as a test of those assumptions: if the area obeys the Hawking area law, then those assumptions remain valid; if not, it means one or more must be wrong. Unlike the Kerr nature of the remnant, which focused on the ringdown portion of the signal, the Hawking area law focuses on the pre-merger signal and the peak of the merger signal: comparing the pre-merger areas with the area at the time of the merger itself. As you can see from the graph below, the full signal (in green) agrees with both the Hawking area theorem (left-hand bound) and the law of energy conservation (right-hand bound), and in excellent agreement with the General Relativity prediction (central gray band).
This figure from the scientific paper investigating the gravitational wave signal GW250114 shows the constraints on the area of the post-merger black hole compared to the pre-merger black holes for the event, with the bounds set by the Hawking area theorem on the left and from energy conservation on the right. The green bump shows the data-driven viable results, with the narrow gray bar representing the General Relativity prediction.
Credit: A.G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations), Physical Review Letters, 2025
This is remarkable for a variety of reasons. Prior to this gravitational wave event, we had only very weak confirmation of the Kerr nature of post-merger black holes, which you obtain from exquisite measurements of the ringdown phase. Prior to this gravitational wave event, we had only weak (2-sigma confidence) of Hawking’s area theorem for black hole mergers, which you obtain by comparing the pre-merger black hole signals with the remnant at the time of the merger. And prior to this gravitational wave event, the most stringent strong-field test we had of General Relativity was from the very first gravitational wave event ever observed: GW150914.
No longer, not to any of that. Thanks to the incredible series of upgrades conducted at LIGO over the past decade, and due to the fact that both LIGO detectors are fully operational, we were able to surpass all of those previous limits with a new event — GW250114 — that, physically, was no better than the original event. Our detectors and our technologies were what was improved, and that enabled us to:
confirm the Kerr nature of the post-merger remnant from the ringdown phase,
vastly improve our confidence in Hawking’s area theorem (to an impressive 4.4-sigma confidence),
find black holes at more than 10 times the initial rate from LIGO’s early days,
and to have a new record-holder for the most stringent strong-field test of Einstein’s General Relativity.
It adds even more fuel to the already overwhelming science case to not only maintain and continue operating both LIGO detectors, but to move forward with LIGO II and LISA as next-generation gravitational wave observatories. The proof is in the results, and the key in continuing to obtain them are the twin LIGO observatories themselves.
Sign up for the Starts With a Bang newsletter
Travel the universe with Dr. Ethan Siegel as he answers the biggest questions of all.
Will we ever grow bored of the savant sleuth? I suspect not – the satisfaction of witnessing a fantastically gifted person crack absurdly complex cases is one of fiction’s most reliable draws. As ever, our screens are swarming with them: in the past year alone we’ve been introduced to Ludwig, David Mitchell’s puzzle-setter turned incredibly astute (if reluctant) detective; been reunited with Natasha Lyonne’s human lie-detector Charlie Cale in Poker Face; and crossed paths once again with brainiac attorney Elsbeth, whose forays into policing are chronicled in the Good Wife spin-off of the same name.
Also back for more mental gymnastics is Morgan Gillory, the protagonist of breezy procedural High Potential, which returns for a second season. With an IQ of 160 – giving her “high intellectual potential” (Mensa typically requires a score of about 130) – Morgan’s ability to unravel mind-bendingly complicated sequences of events is downright astonishing. Yet there’s something a little different about this particular clever-clogs crimestopper. Ever since an antisocial drug addict by the name of Sherlock Holmes set the genius detective tone, such characters have usually had a few issues. Ludwig is reclusive, his talents tempered by intense awkwardness. Cale is a chaotic, commitment-phobic outsider partial to a drink or two, while Elsbeth is a no-filter weirdo who gives people the creeps.
Morgan – played by Kaitlin Olson (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Hacks) – has no comparable weaknesses. When we first meet her she’s working as a cleaner in the offices of the LAPD. After accidentally knocking over a pile of investigation notes and spotting some serious errors, she leaves a clue behind to point the officers in the right direction. Soon, she’s recruited to work alongside the police, where she duly solves a series of extraordinarily labyrinthine crimes with practically no assistance. Morgan is not just inordinately smart, she’s also a fearless, charismatic, glamorous, gorgeous go-getter with flawless instincts and off-the-charts emotional intelligence. She may be a littlepushy at times, but now she’s in the business of saving lives and catching killers, a bit of urgency isn’t exactly inappropriate.
If Morgan is practically perfect in every way, the same can’t be said for her life – initially, at least. A single mother of three, she struggles to make ends meet, and mostly uses her mind palace to get the most out of her coupon-assisted supermarket shop. Motherhood can, of course, stymie women’s professional lives, but Morgan’s willingness to put up with the demands and pay of a minimum-wage job doesn’t quite ring true. Similarly hard to buy is the show’s longest narrative thread: underpinning all her disparate cases is Morgan’s determination to track down the father of her eldest child, who disappeared without a trace 15 years ago. Despite her incredible powers of deduction, she hasn’t the foggiest idea where he is.
Uniformly nice and two-dimensional … the cast of High Potential. Photograph: Andrew Eccles/Disney
But High Potential isn’t overly concerned with realism. Made by ABC in the US, this is slick, narcotic network TV. It’s crowd-pleasing and easy on the eye, the sort of thing you’d traditionally associate more with ITV than BBC Two. Morgan’s new colleagues are uniformly nice, two-dimensional guys: suave detective Karadec (Daniel Sunjata), investigators Daphne and Oz, plus Lt Selena Soto (Scrubs’ Judy Reyes), possibly the most reasonable and least fearsome police chief in cop drama history. No antiheroes, no edge: the vibe is cosy and heartwarming and rather basic.
Obviously, the crimes aren’t cosy or heartwarming or basic. The season one finale saw Morgan taunted by a kidnapper who forced her to solve ludicrously difficult puzzles to save the lives of his victims. He returns in the opening double bill here, abducting a young mother on her way home from a night out – but his real target is clearly Morgan, whom he sees as a worthy opponent in his real-life game of chess. Watching her get tantalisingly close to outwitting this man is tense and thrilling, but something this out-there requires a watertight ending. The question is: is High Potential as clever as its protagonist?
In a word, no. The show is very good at keeping the suspense going, but it can’t quite stick the landing, and the storyline concludes with a preposterous gotcha. Still, there’s always next time. (In fact, Morgan’s subsequent case – although equally bananas – is better thought through, ending with a neat and surprisingly moving climax.) The quality of the plotting may be a tad inconsistent, but like her many predecessors and peers, this virtuoso citizen detective can always be relied upon to save the day.
This Irish gen Z romance begins so naturally, on Halloween in Dublin where Trinity College students are partying in an abandoned building. Rugby player Jason (Adam Lunnon-Collery) is chatting up aspiring indie film-maker Charlie (Liath Hannon); their conversation is laidback and intense, light-hearted and meaningful, like life. “I’m in character as an arrogant jock,” jokes Jason. We’ve just watched him taking stick in the locker room for having his ears pierced. Now you can practically see his heart thumping in his chest talking to Charlie, who is trans.
The pair spend the night drifting through the city; they message a drug dealer (to score fireworks not drugs) and film each other with a Super 8 camera. Nobody hassles them. The movie is gentle and sweet until a sudden reveal – a twist that will require a stiff test of your ability to suspend disbelief, that almost verges on clumsy. But the charisma and lovely naturalism of performances from newcomers Lunnon-Collery and Hannon carries it off. Lunnon-Collery is particularly excellent as Jason, all warmth and charm on the surface.
And fair play to the script by first-time feature director Donncha Gilmore, which gets more interesting as the film goes on, introducing ideas about regret and the unreliability of memory. Jason gets a jolt to his sense of identity: his certainty in himself as the good guy, a friend to the weak. He experiences a wave of shame over something from his past, events that he has reshaped in his memory to take the sting out. An impressive debut.
Toulouse, France — MECANO ID, a leading provider of advanced mechanical and thermal solutions for the space industry, has reached a major milestone. On August 26, its EOS-8’’ satellite ejection system successfully deployed LEAP-1, an Earth observation platform developed by Dhruva Space, aboard a Falcon 9 rocket operated by SpaceX.
This successful separation confirms EOS’’ 8 operational maturity and reinforces MECANO ID’S position as a trusted partner in the development of satellite separation solutions for today’s and tomorrow’s space missions.
Watch the successful LEAP-1 separation.
A key milestone for MECANO ID
For 30 years, MECANO ID has been designing and developing advanced mechanical and thermal solutions for the space sector. With EOS-8’’, the company has reached a significant milestone: a successful flight on Falcon 9.
This milestone crowns a long development effort carried out in partnership with CNES, the French Space Agency. This institutional framework provides EOS-8’’ with strong credibility, reflecting the high level of expertise and rigor of French R&D.
A Robust and Versatile Ejection System with Proven Flight Heritage
EOS-8’’ stands out as a robust and versatile solution, designed to meet the diverse needs of satellite operators. Its proven mechanical architecture ensures reliable and repeatable performance, supported by mechanical models provided to users.
The system has been qualified to withstand the most demanding launch environments, covering a broad envelope compatible with current and future launch vehicles. Its flight readiness has already been confirmed and validated on Ariane 6 (Arianespace) and Transporter (SpaceX).
With the successful deployment of LEAP-1, EOS-8’’ joins the category of systems with proven flight heritage, demonstrating its ability to integrate into a wide range of launch campaigns, whether for institutional, commercial, or constellation satellites. With TRL 9 achieved, EOS-8’’ is now a reliable solution for current and future space missions.
Competitiveness and Responsiveness
Beyond technical performance, EOS-8’’ is designed to meet the economic and operational requirements of today’s market. Its competitive pricing, combined with strong volume discounts, makes it particularly well-suited for constellation launch campaigns. With short lead times, MECANO ID enables satellite operators to secure their launch schedules and gain agility, an essential advantage in a fast-paced, competitive market.
With this successful flight, MECANO ID confirms its role as a key partner for satellite operators worldwide.
By combining mechanical robustness, institutional validation, proven flight heritage, and market responsiveness, EOS-8’’ establishes itself as a reference solution for satellite deployment. Building on this flight experience and 30 years of expertise in the space industry, MECANO ID looks forward to continuing collaborations with agencies, manufacturers, and operators to support the growth of space missions in the decades ahead.
About MECANO ID Based in Toulouse, France, at the heart of the European space ecosystem, MECANO ID has been developing advanced mechanical and thermal solutions for the space industry for 30 years.
Specializing in engineering, simulation, testing, composite manufacturing, and integration, the company delivers reliable, high-performance systems tailored to extreme environments, providing customized solutions to meet the specific requirements of each mission.
Supported by a dedicated team and trusted partners, MECANO ID is committed to innovation, quality, and sustainability, assisting space agencies, satellite manufacturers, and equipment suppliers, and actively contributing to the future of the space sector.
For more information, visit www.mecano-id.fr
Media Contact: Emilie Genoudet – Communication Consultant: emilie@felicette.agency
This book is a trip. Among other things, it copiously details all the drugs that the US-born professor of history and philosophy of science at the Université Paris Cité has ingested. They include psilocybin, LSD, cannabis; quetiapine and Xanax (for anxiety); venlafaxine, Prozac, Lexapro and tricyclics (antidepressants); caffeine (“I have drunk coffee every single day without fail since September 13, 1990”); and, at least for him, the always disappointing alcohol.
The really trippy thing, though, is not so much Justin Smith-Ruiu’s descriptions of his drug experiences, but the fact that they’re written by a tough-minded analytic philosopher, one as familiar with AJ Ayer’s Foundations of Empirical Knowledge as Aldous Huxley’s mescaline-inspired The Doors of Perception. Moreover, they’re presented with the aim of melting the minds of his philosophical peers and the rest of us by suggesting that psychedelics dissolve our selves and make us part of cosmic consciousness, thereby rendering us free in the way the 17th-century Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza defined it (paraphrased by Smith-Ruiu as “an agreeable acquiescence in the way one’s own body is moving in the necessary order of things”).
The melting metaphor is apt, since the primal scene of early modern western philosophy came when the 17th-century French thinker René Descartes melted a piece of wax. The lump may change its form, smell, length, breadth, and yet, Descartes supposed, we still claim to know that it is the same piece of wax. The knower can be wrong about all their perceptions involving this wax but not, Descartes argued, that they are thinking: this is the basis of his famous “I think therefore I am” – by means of which the French thinker made us the rational, science‑venerating beings we have been ever since.
Smith-Ruiu, discombobulatingly, flips the script on the Cartesian thought experiment: what if, instead of melting the wax, Descartes had “melted his mind” with acid, or one of those hallucinogens starting to arrive in Europe across the Atlantic along with potatoes and tobacco, such as peyote or ayahuasca? What if he had not foregrounded rationality and instead extolled the imaginative powers that, Smith-Ruiu suggests, are unleashed by psychedelics? The west might have ended up seeing the world completely differently, and human beings as “infinite reservoirs of light and wisdom”.
There’s more in Smith-Ruiu’s psychedelic experience, one might say, than is dreamt of in strait-laced colleagues’ philosophies. His thinking seems kin to such voguish, mind-blowing movements as Markus Gabriel’s new realism, and Timothy Morton’s implosive holism and object-oriented philosophy. Immanuel Kant claimed the transcendent was by definition behind an impenetrable veil, inferable perhaps but never knowable. We could never, in this world, see God. For Smith-Ruiu, psychedelics might help lift that veil. For that thought alone I’m amazed – and cheered – that he got tenure.
It’s worth mentioning at this point that this is not one of those gonzo books typed while the author is out of their gourd. Smith-Ruiu is no Hunter S Thompson. It is called On Drugs but it was not written on drugs (apart, presumably, from some of the prescription meds he details above and the odd espresso hit). “I am as I write, sober, lucid, and entirely focused on the task at hand.”
The book ends with a remarkable plot twist (philosophical spoiler alert!). In 2023, Smith-Ruiu attended Catholic mass for the first time in 40 years at the church next door to his Paris apartment. His claim here is that the psychedelic experience is analogous to that of ritual worship: ordinary time is interpreted as a distortion, and during mass one might perceive, as he did on mushrooms, something like eternity. Another parallel is that one submits one’s will in church as on a psychedelic trip. He writes: “Psychedelics, like religion, like poetry are among other things an abandonment of the will to go it alone.” Smith-Ruiu is self-aware enough to note how absurd this sounds: that psychedelics have become his gateway drug to the Catholic church.
And you don’t even need to take magic mushrooms from some geezer in a Dutch head shop (as Smith-Ruiu did) to melt your mind. He cites the opening of Proust’s novel À la Recherche du Temps Perdu, when little Marcel dreamily imagines that he has become some of the things he has been reading about before nodding off – a church, a quartet, the rivalry between François I and Charles V – as an example of everyday psychedelia.
That isn’t the only non-pharmaceutical way to expand your consciousness – you could try reading this extraordinary book, whose riches I can only hint at in this review.
For evidence of how high inflation has gotten, look no further than Broadway. The fancy painting at the heart of the play “Art” cost the equivalent of $40,000 in 1998. In a crackling new revival, it’s a hefty $300,000.
The painting in question is a 4-by-5-foot white-on-white work with white lines. Playwright Yasmina Reza puts it at the center of an escalating fight between three male, middle-aged friends that exposes their fault lines, leading to a night in which each are ripped apart by the others and putting a 25-year friendship in jeopardy.
If $300,000 sounds like a ridiculous price for a monothematic canvas, you’ll side with Marc, played with pitch-perfect exasperation by Bobby Cannavale. If the painting speaks to you, you’ll be with Serge, a flinty, slightly full-of-himself Neil Patrick Harris. If you just want to hang out and not talk about the painting any more, you’ll identify with James Corden’s hapless Yvan.
Under Scott Ellis’ tight and enthralling direction and with three perfectly cast actors who seem to be having a ball at the Music Box Theatre, “Art” frequently erupts in laughter but still has plenty to say about friendship, power dynamics and how we get on each others’ nerves. The 90-minute play opened Tuesday night.
This is the first time “Art,” translated from the original French by Christopher Hampton and which won the Tony Award for best play in 1998 starring Alan Alda, Victor Garber and Alfred Molina, has returned to Broadway, and it feels nothing like an antique. Designer David Rockwell puts the latest three lads in an elegant gray, spare living room that reeks of chilly luxury but also has little personality.
Marc believes that Serge — by buying the Modernist painting against the express aesthetic rules followed by Marc — is indicating that he has stepped out of Marc’s shadow. It is for him nothing less than a betrayal. Serge finds a new intolerance and inflexibility in his friend and a hostility to things new. They both lobby Yvan to be on their side, and when he vacillates, he is declared a spineless amoeba.
“It’s just a picture, we don’t have to get bogged down with it, life’s too short,” says Yvan at one point. But it’s precisely because life is short that even small things matter.
Cannavale’s Marc is prone to outbursts and patting his friend’s shoulders, less out of affection than an expression of dominance. Harris’ Serge goes from needy to flinty to icy, and Corden fills his Yvan with the comedian’s gift for physical comedy, literally plunging into a sofa to search for something or looking sheepish as he buttons a jacket.
A highlight is a hysterical scene in which the three men, still festering their grievances, silently eat olives and drop the pits in a bowl with a loud ting. And Corden triggers a mid-show ovation after nailing a 900-word monster of a monologue that smacks of Mark Rylance doing something similar in the same theater in “La Bête.”
“Art” has never been a discussion about Modern art, despite its title. The white painting is merely the playwright’s way to get at microaggressions and competition among friends, and how seemingly small things — like the way one waves away cigarette smoke or the tone of a suggestion — can fester in the other.
Sure, inflation has hit Broadway tickets, too, but this “Art” is a howl. Bring a friend.