Blog

  • Eversheds Sutherland advises Pulse Clean Energy on multi-million-pound finance package

    Eversheds Sutherland has advised Pulse Clean Energy on its £220 million finance package with a syndicate of banks including Santander, NatWest, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., NORD/LB, Investec, and CIBC.  

    Pulse Clean Energy has established itself as a leading developer and operator of battery storage in the UK, with a planned operational capacity of over 2GWh by 2030.  

    The proceeds of the facilities will be used to refinance existing debt and facilitate the construction of six new ready-to-build BESS sites, including the conversion of existing diesel sites into battery storage assets, and support the ongoing funding of nine existing projects.

    The cross-practice Eversheds Sutherland team was led by Partner Peter Greenall (Energy and Infrastructure Finance), supported by Consultant Timothy Han, and Associates Jack Mitchell and Eunice Wong. The wider team, who advised throughout the transaction on corporate, real estate, planning, construction and regulatory matters, included Partner Stephen Hill and Associate Julia Gawecka (Corporate);  Partner Ben Brown, Senior Associate Rory Budworth and Associate Sophie Lowe (Regulatory); Principal Associate Christine Barnsley, Senior Associate Jodie Butler, Consultant Emma Andersen (Konexo) (all Real Estate); Partner Karen Mutton (Planning); and Partners Richard Streeter, and Richard Black, Principal Associates Sacha Bacco and Claire de Joux and Senior Associate Kristen Centorame (all Construction).

    Peter Greenall, Partner, Eversheds Sutherland, commented:

    “We are proud to have worked on this exciting and important transaction that will propel the advancement of Pulse Clean Energy’s battery storage portfolio. The deal exemplifies our deep knowledge of the battery storage market in the UK and our ability to draw upon a wide range of practice areas to seamlessly support clients in complex renewable energy financings.”

    Nicola Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of Pulse Clean Energy, commented:

    “This landmark investment reflects strong global confidence in the growing UK battery storage market and in Pulse Clean Energy’s ability to deliver at scale. These six facilities will not only strengthen grid resilience but also unlock significant cost savings for consumers by allowing more renewable power onto the grid and reducing the need for expensive backup power during peak periods.  

    “We’re proud to be at the heart of the UK’s energy networks – delivering critical infrastructure and turning former fossil fuel sites into energy assets which will enable a better energy system. With the backing of partners who share our long-term vision, we’re accelerating toward a future where energy is not only clean, but reliable and affordable for everyone.” 

    The materials on the Eversheds Sutherland website are for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. While reasonable care is taken to ensure accuracy, the materials may not reflect the most current legal developments. Eversheds Sutherland disclaims liability for actions taken based on the materials. Always consult a qualified lawyer for specific legal matters. To view the full disclaimer, see our Terms and Conditions or Disclaimer section in the footer.

    Continue Reading

  • Japan boxing to adopt stricter safety rules after deaths of two fighters

    Japan boxing to adopt stricter safety rules after deaths of two fighters





    Japan boxing to adopt stricter safety rules after deaths of two fighters – Daily Times

































    Continue Reading

  • Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 medals unveiled as teams arrive in England to make history – World Rugby

    Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 medals unveiled as teams arrive in England to make history – World Rugby

    1. Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025 medals unveiled as teams arrive in England to make history  World Rugby
    2. France vs England LIVE: Women’s Rugby World Cup warm-up – watch stream, score & updates  BBC
    3. BBC Sport unveils powerhouse lineup for the Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025  BBC
    4. I’m a Women’s Sports Agent – Here’s What It’s Really Like  Capsule NZ
    5. Excitement builds as Brighton & Hove prepares to host Women’s Rugby World Cup matches  Brighton Journal

    Continue Reading

  • How Trump gets what he wants from companies

    How Trump gets what he wants from companies

    Some experts say his interventionist approach to the affairs of investor-owned corporations represents something new — at least in American government, though academics say it has echoes in approaches seen in China, post-war Europe and Singapore.

    “In a U.S. context, it’s unprecedented in modern history,” said Ryan Bourne, a chair at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. While Trump was not shy about using his bully pulpit to harangue companies in his first term, Bourne said, carving out firm-specific deals that directly pay the government, calling for the ouster of specific CEOs and dictating how companies should set prices shows that Trump has escalated his willingness to intervene.

    “It’s not so much free markets anymore,” Bourne said. “It’s fee markets.”

    The stock market appears to be content, too. The broad S&P 500 index has continued setting records, bouncing back from a rapid decline in the wake of Trump’s first major tariff announcement in April.

    Even some of Trump’s opponents see the appeal of and the potential for his efforts.

    “I incredibly disagree with the guy on almost every issue,” said a progressive strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity to offer a candid assessment of Trump’s strategy. “He is showing the power of the American presidency and the power of the bully pulpit. Because this isn’t even him passing legislation on this stuff or signing executive orders. This is him tweeting. And it’s not that different than the pulpit that FDR used and Teddy Roosevelt used.”

    This person criticized Trump as simultaneously being focused on his own enrichment as president, including through newly formed crypto companies. But this person added that Democrats could take a page out of Trump’s strategy in regard to corporations in the future and “adapt to the changing presidency.”

    “I don’t believe he’s actually taking [corporations] on, but if you want to do that, there’s now precedent, and Democrats should do that and not only use the pulpit, but take action when necessary,” this person said. “You can’t go back to normal after this.”

    Trump’s direct interventions have picked up pace recently. On Monday, he said he had struck a deal with chipmakers Nvidia — the world’s most valuable company — and AMD to share a percentage of revenues from chips they sell to China with the U.S. government.

    “I only care about the country,” Trump said Monday of the agreement. “I don’t care about myself. And [Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang] said, ‘Would you make it 15?’ So we negotiated a little deal.”

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang speaks alongside Trump about investing in America at the White House on April 30.Jim Watson / AFP via Getty Images file

    Nvidia and AMD did not directly confirm the agreement but said in statements that they hope to revive sales to China.

    Trump also secured a “Golden Share” for the United States as part of a merger agreement between U.S. Steel and Japanese conglomerate Nippon Steel. A U.S. Steel representative did not respond to a request for comment.

    Media conglomerates Disney and Paramount have also made strategic financial decisions to win more favorable treatment from Trump and his administration. In December, just weeks before he took office, ABC, a Disney company, settled a defamation lawsuit Trump brought against it for $15 million over inaccurate comments made by anchor George Stephanopoulos.

    Last month, Paramount, CBS’ parent company, agreed to pay $16 million to settle a separate lawsuit over “60 Minutes’” handling of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential election season. The settlement came just days before the Trump administration approved Paramount’s merger with Skydance Media.

    If there were implicit threats involved in getting those firms to agree to the arrangements, Trump has also not shied away from making explicit warnings. Last week, he called for the ouster of Lip-Bu Tan, the CEO of chipmaker Intel, over allegations that he was too close to China, prompting a last-minute visit to the White House. It seemed to work: By Monday, Trump appeared to reverse himself, calling Tan’s career “an amazing story” and saying his Cabinet and Tan plan to bring unspecified “suggestions” to Trump about how to move forward. On Tuesday, he was already taking aim at another firm, calling on the head of Goldman Sachs to fire its chief economist because of the company’s bearishness on his tariffs.

    Image: President Trump Makes An Announcement In The Oval Office
    Trump speaks behind an engraved glass disc Apple CEO Tim Cook gave him at an event in the Oval Office on Aug. 6.Win McNamee / Getty Images

    Two months after Trump threatened to impose tariffs on Apple products if it continued to source products from India, CEO Tim Cook visited the Oval Office last week to pledge billions in extra investments in the United States and give Trump a gold-plated glass sculpture.

    An Apple spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

    Congressional pushback to Trump’s efforts has been light. Some GOP China hawks joined Democrats in attacking the Nvidia and AMD deal, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., has called for an investigation into Paramount’s settlement with Trump.

    But the threat of being attacked publicly by Trump, with midterms one year away, has cast a pall over most Republicans who may have once been inclined to rein in executive powers — and have now seen enthusiastic Trump supporters oust a growing cast of moderate former colleagues.

    The fear of reprisals by Trump has also extended to the firms themselves, which appear to be making strategic decisions to forgo any kind of legal challenge to his methods.

    It is a short-term calculus that may preserve shareholder value in the short run. But over the longer term, experts say, it degrades the overall business climate.

    “Where it can lead is businesses, rather than focusing on creating value, now seek to play footsie with politicians more and more,” said Bourne, of the Cato Institute. “And when you have more firm-specific and industry-specific deals, you end up with a highly complex tax and regulatory code. It makes the economy that much less efficient.”

    But the current political and legal climate may essentially be dictating firms’ decisions to comply with Trump for them, said Jeffrey Gordon, a law professor at Columbia University specializing in constitutional and transactional law. Any attempt at litigation would prove time-consuming and could disrupt business decisions, he said — with an outcome far from certain given the Supreme Court’s favorable rulings on Trump’s executive authority.

    “You’ve got a president who’s got unknown bounds on his authority and an appetite for battle — the easy thing to do is give in,” Gordon said, “which is what we’re seeing.”

    Continue Reading

  • How many steps lead to better health? It may not be 10,000 : NPR

    How many steps lead to better health? It may not be 10,000 : NPR

    There’s a growing consensus among researchers on how many daily steps are needed to improve health.

    Marco VDM/iStockphoto/Getty Images


    hide caption

    toggle caption

    Marco VDM/iStockphoto/Getty Images

    From pricey wearable devices to your phone, it has never been easier to track your daily physical activity, or lack of it. And if you’re like many Americans — and spend 9-plus hours sitting everyday — chances are you could probably stand to take a few more steps.

    But just how many should you aim for if you want to live a longer and healthier life? New research suggests 7,000 is a good target.

    Scientists have made big strides in the science of step-taking over the past decade, gathering tons of data.

    And no surprise, they find the more you move, the less likely you are to die from cardiovascular disease and other ailments.

    But, they’ve also concluded that the widely-cited target of 10,000 steps is not rooted in solid science — it grew out of a Japanese promotional campaign.

    In fact, a number of studies have now landed on a new number to keep in our heads as we trudge through the day.

    7,000 steps tends to be the range where there seems to be diminishing return on investment for increasing more steps,” says Melody Ding, a professor of public health at the University of Sydney.

    Ding is the latest researcher to dive into the evidence, as part of an effort to update the physical activity guidelines in her country.

    Her team reviewed data collected from more than 160,000 adults around the world on the link between step count and a variety of health outcomes.

    Among their findings: Taking 7,000 steps per day was associated with nearly a 50% lower risk of dying compared to the bare minimum of 2,000 steps.

    The study, published in the Lancet Public Health, also showed the chance of developing cancer fell by 25%, type 2 diabetes 14%, cardiovascular disease 25%, symptoms of depression 22% and dementia 38%.

    Now, Ding says there were still some improvements for those who exceeded 7,000 steps, but overall they saw “diminishing returns on investment,” meaning the added health benefits across the population become smaller and smaller.

    “It definitely doesn’t do harm if you go beyond 7,000,” she says, “So for anyone who’s already doing 10,000 and more, there is no point of going back, but for the folks who are finding it harder to get there, 7,000 could be a really realistic target.”

    The research underscores that, on the lower end, even a modest jump in steps can have a major impact on your well-being.

    For example, simply jumping from 2,000 to 4,000 steps in a day was accompanied by nearly a 36% lower risk of dying.

    The work from Ding’s team reflects a growing consensus in the scientific literature that around 7,000 steps could be a reasonable target for the public. (There is some variation in the exact number depending on the study.)

    Amanda Paluch, who has published two meta-analyses on step count and health, has found a similar range as this latest study, though her work suggests the step targets may also vary with age.

    “We were seeing that older adults did not seem to need as many steps compared to younger adults,” says Paluch, a physical activity epidemiologist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

    Specifically, Paluch’s research shows the decreased risk of dying appeared to plateau between 6,000 to 8,000 steps for people in their 60s and older, versus 8,000 to 10,000 for younger adults.

    She says this latest study is one of the first to consider a broader array of health outcomes than just mortality and cardiovascular disease, but cautions some of the results, such as those related to cancer, depression and dementia, are still somewhat “preliminary” because they’re based on only a few studies.

    Researchers have also tried to pin down whether speed makes a difference. Here, the new Lancet study could not make any definitive conclusions, in part because there are various ways to measure intensity and differences could simply reflect better overall fitness and physical function.

    We actually don’t see an association once we consider the total number of steps,” says Paluch, who has also looked at this question. “So, essentially, the total number of steps, regardless of how fast you’re walking, seems to have a benefit,” she says.

    The federal government’s current physical activity guidelines don’t actually recommend a daily step target. Instead, they focus on time, recommending 150 to 300 minutes of moderate intensity exercise a week for adults, or 75 minutes to 150 minutes of vigorous exercise.

    But Dr. William Kraus, who worked on those guidelines, would love to see steps included the next time they are updated.

    “Because they’re objective measures that anyone can get off their phone, right?” says Kraus, a cardiologist whose lab studies exercise and health at Duke University.

    He says ultimately both approaches to measuring physical activity reflect the same thing — the amount of energy being burned up through movement.

    “What you’re seeing is the more energy expenditure that you consume with physical activity, the greater benefit you get,” he says.

    And because the point is to get physical activity – and expend energy – it doesn’t have to be just steps. Kraus says you can translate one mile of walking into one fifth of a mile swimming, or five miles cycling.

    Melody Ding at the University of Sydney says she likes to think of movement in the same way as diet.

    “Just like we need a balanced, healthy diet, it’s important for us to have balanced physical activity, training throughout the week as well,” she says.

    In other words, get those steps, but also make time for mobility and strength training. All of it adds up.

    If you are counting steps, Kraus emphasizes that the evidence pointing to roughly 7,000 steps a day should not discount the value of doing more steps, even if the upsides that have been studied so far become incremental above that number.

    “Everybody wants to know how little I need to do. That is the wrong question,” he says, “Anything is better than nothing, more is better than less.”

    What’s more, the calculations appear to change when you factor in how much time people spend sitting.

    He cites evidence that suggests people need to aim higher than 7,000 or even 10,000 if they spend eight hours in a chair.

    “If you can get 13,000 steps, you can get rid of all the negative risks that are associated with sitting, ” he says.

    Continue Reading

  • New Canyon Citylite simplifies urban cycling – and I’d wager it could even replace your car

    New Canyon Citylite simplifies urban cycling – and I’d wager it could even replace your car

    Canyon’s all-new Citylite bike range comes with simplified low-maintenance drivetrains and a Bosch Performance Line ebike option, with all bikes equipped for urban riding. Prices start from £1,449, making the Citylite a potential car replacement for urban dwellers.

    The Citylite frame is made from aluminium, and both models come with a carbon fork to keep weight down and bring vibration-damping comfort.

    Unlike Canyon’s other urban bikes, such as the minimalist, sporty Roadlite and the all-surface capable Pathlite:ON, the Citylite range has been designed for pure city use. That means low-maintenance belt drives and hub gears.

    All of the bikes come fully equipped for city riding, whether for shopping, commuting, school runs or weekend leisure rides.

    Fully loaded specifications

    With two frame-design options, the Citylite fits a wide range of riders. Canyon

    Citylite models come equipped with fenders/mudguards, a kickstand, a rear rack and dynamo lights.

    The Citylite:ON ebike forgoes the dynamo lighting in favour of an integrated light system powered by the bike’s battery. The Citylite:ON lights feature integrated turn signalling and the bikes come with a frame-integrated lock (using the same key as the removable battery).

    frame lock
    The frame lock uses the same key as the removable battery. Canyon

    The ON models get an SP Connect SPC+ E-CAP smartphone mount. Canyon also offers an optional wireless charging module designed to enable you to charge your phone (wirelessly) directly from the ebike battery.

    The QL3.1 MIK HD rear rack is rated to carry child seats with a 27kg maximum capacity. A front rack is available separately (10kg capacity). Both models come with a trailer-hitch interface (Croozer-compatible) with a 60kg carrying capacity.

    Comfort is king

    Citylite:ON
    The Citylite:ON could be your ideal car replacement for city riding. Canyon

    Canyon has put a lot of emphasis on designing the Citylite around comfort – from the relaxed ride position and stable handling through to component choices such as the Selle Royal Essenza saddle and Canyon-designed backswept cockpit with an integrated light and ergonomic grips.

    The bikes have 650b wheels running huge 47mm semi-slick tyres.

    All models feature Canyon-designed Promax hydraulic disc brakes, which are wired into the rear light so when you brake, following traffic is alerted that you’re slowing down.

    Canyon Citylite rear light
    The rear light is wired to the brakes to indicate when you are slowing. Canyon

    The frame is available in a standard step-over design and a step-through. The frame shapes are aimed at different-sized riders.

    The step-over frame is aimed at taller riders, from 165cm to 195cm. The step-through is intended for those from 155cm to 180cm.

    Canyon says both the seatpost and handlebar are designed to be easily adjusted.

    Citylite:ON and trailer
    The Citylite:ON has a rear-hitch compatible dropout. Canyon

    Canyon Citylite range and pricing details

    Citylite

    Step-over Citylite.
    The step-over Citylite. Canyon
    • Shimano Nexus 8-speed hub gear, Gates CDN belt drive
    • Supernova Starstream Mini (HB) light integrated into bar, Iridium M12 rear light, powered by hub dynamo
    • Bottle cage mount on down tube
    • Trailer-hitch interface with up to 60kg carrying capacity
    • Atran Velo Edge HV kickstand
    • QL3.1, MIK HD rear rack
    • Child-seat compatibility (up to 27kg) and front-rack compatibility (up to 10kg)
    • Weight, step-over: 15.94kg; step-through: 15.88kg
    • Sizing, step-over: one size (M/L, 165-195); step-through: one size (XS/S, 155-180)
    • Price: £1,449 / $TBC / €1,499
    Step-through Citylite.
    The step-through Citylite. Canyon

    Citylite:ON

    The step-over Citylite:ON
    The step-over Citylite:ON. Canyon
    • Bosch Performance Line 75Nm, 600W drive unit, Bosch Purion 200 handlebar display (inc. walk assist function)
    • Gates CDC belt drive, Shimano Nexus 5-speed internal geared hub
    • Removable battery: 400Wh (up to 85km range) with 250Wh PowerMore range extender (+50km) option
    • Supernova Starstream Mini front light, integrated into the handlebar, rear M15 light with brake signal functionality
    • Water bottle cage mount on down tube
    • Atran Velo Edge HV kickstand
    • Frame lock (with the same key as battery lock)
    • QL3.1, MIK HD rear rack (27kg capacity)
    • Trailer hitch interface with up to 60kg carrying capacity
    • Weight, step-over: 22.1kg; step-through: 21.6kg
    • Sizing, step-over: one size (M/L, 165-195); step-through: one size (XS/S, 155-180)
    • Pricing: £2,799 / $TBC / €2,999
    The Step-through Citylite:ON
    Canyon

    Continue Reading

  • The Webb telescope’s look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak

    The Webb telescope’s look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak

    As scientists delve deeper into a star system with seven rocky worlds, the prospect of one being a habitable planet seems to be quickly fading. 

    Researchers who used the James Webb Space Telescope, a joint partnership of NASA and its European and Canadian counterparts, determined the third planet from the TRAPPIST-1 star is unlikely to have air. For anyone keeping count, that’s strike three for the system, which lies about 40 light-years away from Earth in space

    The new findings on exoplanet TRAPPIST-1d, published in The Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, mirror similar results for TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c, which orbit closer to their red dwarf host, a tiny-yet-violent type of star found throughout the galaxy.

    “On a personal level, of course, there’s a part of me that would have loved to see signs of air on TRAPPIST-1d,” Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a University of Chicago fellow and lead author of the paper, told Mashable. “Science isn’t about hoping for a yes, it’s about finding what’s real. So here we’ve learned that TRAPPIST-1d is not an Earth twin.” 

    SEE ALSO:

    Scientists find temperate planet in nearby system full of rocky worlds

    Astronomers discovered the TRAPPIST-1 system about eight years ago with the now-retired Spitzer Space Telescope. Soon they made the swarming exoplanets a priority for investigating their potential for life, with all seven roughly the size of Earth.

    Scientists were particularly interested in finding out whether the TRAPPIST planets have atmospheres, because red dwarfs are the most ubiquitous kind of star in the Milky Way. If these planets can retain atmospheres, even while subjected to close-range blasts of stellar radiation, perhaps an abundance of other worlds out there could, too.

    Scientists are trying to determine whether any of of the rocky worlds orbiting TRAPPIST-1, a red dwarf star about 40 light-years away from Earth, could have an atmosphere.
    Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech illustration

    When TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c didn’t appear to have atmospheres, the research community wasn’t deterred, as neither sibling planet was predicted to have one, given how close they are to the star. 

    Mashable Light Speed

    But TRAPPIST-1d, which circles the star every four days, is a different story. This exoplanet is on the cusp of the star’s theorized habitable zone — the region of space where worlds might be able to have lakes and oceans on their surfaces.


    “Science isn’t about hoping for a yes, it’s about finding what’s real.”

    Webb observed TRAPPIST-1d with a method called transmission spectroscopy. When a planet crosses in front of its host star, starlight should shine through its atmosphere, if there is one. Molecules within an atmosphere absorb certain light wavelengths, or colors, so astronomers can look for missing segments of the rainbow to figure out chemicals in its composition. The researchers looked for things like water vapor, methane, carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide.

    But first, the team had to account for so-called “stellar contamination.” Just like the sun, red dwarfs can get sunspots, so their starlight isn’t completely uniform. Variability in the light signals can obscure or even imitate signals coming from a planet. After correcting for this problem in the data, the researchers found no clear signs of gases.

    That means scientists can rule out certain types of atmospheres, like the thick hydrogen-rich atmosphere of Neptune, or a cloud-free atmosphere akin to that of early Earth. But a few other potential scenarios could explain the results without the planet having to be a barren rock. It could have an extremely thin atmosphere, sort of like Mars, that would be difficult to detect with this method, Piaulet-Ghorayeb said, or it could have thick, high-altitude clouds blocking atmospheric signatures, perhaps like Venus.

    “We also learned something about what the best way to even look for water in the atmosphere of these temperate planets might be,” she said. “Maybe transmission spectroscopy isn’t it.”

    Whether red dwarf stars, sometimes called M-type, can harbor planets with atmospheres is a key question for Webb to answer. The observatory has begun a massive study of rocky worlds, first reported by Mashable, specifically to figure out if planets orbiting closely around them could have air. Rather than transmission spectroscopy, the survey will rely on a different method, called the secondary eclipse technique, which avoids some of the stellar contamination issues. 

    The team says not to give up on the TRAPPIST system just yet. After all, planets E, F, G, and H could have a better chance of holding onto their atmospheres because they’re farther from the star’s flares, which can strip away a planet’s atmosphere. In particular, TRAPPIST researchers are looking forward to studying E, the fourth planet from the star. 

    The challenge for Webb will be overcoming the planets’ more extreme distance and colder environments, which make atmospheric readings more difficult. 

    What makes Piaulet-Ghorayeb hopeful about the continued quest for rocky worlds with water and air is the milestone achieved. 

    “For the first time, if there had been an Earth-like atmosphere on a temperate terrestrial planet, we could have found it,” she said. “And I don’t think that in any study before, with any instrument that we had before, we could really get to that level of precision.”

    Continue Reading

  • 7 pairs of wireless headphones we are still desperate to see in 2025

    7 pairs of wireless headphones we are still desperate to see in 2025

    We’re a demanding lot, aren’t we? Not just the What Hi-Fi? team (although we do have suitably high standards), but hi-fi and audio customers in general. With so many great products out there on the market, we’re never satisfied. We want to see how far the envelope can be pushed, and that means we are always desperate to see what’s arriving on the hazy headphones horizon.

    In fairness, some of the would-be models speculated below have been overdue for some time, while others may be close to wishful thinking. Either way, there’s a reason we’re excited to see them arrive – because the wireless headphones they are set to take over from are so brilliant in the first place. If anything, it’s a compliment…

    Continue Reading

  • ‘We are obsessed with weight’: Bob Harper on life as a trainer on The Biggest Loser | Television

    ‘We are obsessed with weight’: Bob Harper on life as a trainer on The Biggest Loser | Television

    In Netflix’s new documentary about The Biggest Loser, Joelle Gwynn, a contestant on the televised weight-loss competition, has a message for her former fitness trainer: ‘Fuck you, Bob Harper.’ Gwynn was a contestant on the US show in 2008, and she has just watched a clip of Harper screaming at her to “shut the fuck up” after she failed to run on a treadmill for the specified time. “Oh, and your little dog too,” she adds.

    The Biggest Loser was a phenomenally successful TV show. It ran for 18 seasons in the US, attracting more than 10 million viewers in its prime and spawning more than 30 international versions, including a UK iteration presented in 2012 by Davina McCall.

    The show was undeniably the making of Harper, who went from being a farmer’s son who dropped out of university because he couldn’t afford it, to an American household name who appeared on The Traitors US and RuPaul’s Drag Race. He is “really proud” of the years he worked on “Loser”, as he refers to it, and has little time for its critics.

    “That Joelle, she just does not like me, does she?” he says with a grin when he speaks to me via Zoom, having just finished watching Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser, the new documentary in which he also appears. He is calling from his chic, monochrome New York apartment, where his “little dog”, Ralph (after Ralph Lauren), is darting around behind him. Days away from his 60th birthday, the reality TV star says he has “learned to not take things personally”.

    For the uninitiated, each season of The Biggest Loser was filmed over a 30-week period, and brought together a group of people who wanted to lose weight (and who, like all good reality TV contestants, often had deeply harrowing back stories). Contact with their friends and families was cut off, and they were sent to live on a ranch, put into teams and assigned a trainer (such as Harper), who guided them through an intense workout schedule. Outside the gym, the teams faced “challenges” and “temptations” for which they could win prizes or immunity from elimination. Each week, the contestants were weighed, and those who had lost the lowest proportion of their previous body weight risked being sent home. At the end of the season, $250,000 was awarded to the remaining contestant who had lost the most weight.

    Harper in Fit for TV. Photograph: Courtesy of Netflix

    The rigid format meant that being as thin as possible – not necessarily as healthy as possible, though contestants were monitored by health professionals – became the primary goal of the show, and huge emphasis was placed on the way contestants looked, with dolled-up finalists walking on stage alongside sad, washed-out holograms of their pre-show selves.

    “We’re all obsessed with our looks,” Harper says in Fit for TV. “Because aren’t we?” he says when I ask him about it. “I know that probably sounds really shallow, but I have worked in the fitness business for a long, long time. And yes, I want to be as healthy as I possibly can”, as do “all the people that I’ve ever worked with”, but looks are “a huge part of it … I want to look good when I go to the beach.”

    Harper’s own looks were also important when it came to The Biggest Loser. The roles played by him and Jillian Michaels, the show’s other original trainer, partly involved being eye candy for viewers: thin, ripped examples of what the show deemed to be desirable. Harper has a number of tattoos, which were “a real issue” with the producers, “because they didn’t know what the American audience would or would not respond to”. He was made to wear long sleeves to cover them up – until, Harper says, on one non-shooting day: “I didn’t have a shirt on when I was training and they saw me and they were like, ‘Oh, he looks great. He can show whatever he wants.’”

    Jillian Michaels and Bob Harper. Photograph: Richard Hartog/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

    Producers also worried about him talking about being gay on the show. Harper came out at 15, but didn’t discuss it publicly until a conversation he had with a gay contestant was shown on The Biggest Loser in 2013. “Everyone was kind of nervous about that,” he says, but his view was: “Why would I not talk about it? I’m not ashamed of who I am. I never have been.”

    Born in rural Tennessee, Harper says he was “definitely different” from his parents and two older sisters, and as a young adult he moved an hour south to Nashville to look for work. The owner of his local gym took him under her wing, and he began teaching fitness classes, which took him to Los Angeles, where his clients included Julia Roberts and Ellen DeGeneres. Thanks to the film stars and Hollywood agents who attended his classes, his name was put forward when producers began discussing The Biggest Loser, and he went on to become the only trainer to appear in all 17 seasons, between 2004 and 2016, as well as the one-season 2020 reboot, in which he was the show’s presenter.

    The Biggest Loser “was the hardest thing I’ve ever done,” Harper says. Even on “dark days” when there was no filming, the trainer was busy leading “more sensible, low-pressure workouts” – those days were “when we got all the real work done”, he says. He tired himself out to the point that after one season, he got shingles, and remembers being so hungry on set that he would sometimes eat the snacks that had been provided for the contestants in temptation challenges.

    “Temptations” were one aspect of the show with which Harper did not agree. They involved bringing the contestants into rooms full of high-calorie food, which they had to decide whether to eat (which could win them advantages in the competition or the chance for a treat, such as visiting family) or refuse, to prevent weight gain. He tried to push back on these challenges to the producers “all the time”, he says, but he and the other trainers “didn’t have a say in it”.

    The Biggest Loser ran for 18 seasons in the US. Photograph: Courtesy of Netflix

    Such challenges, as well as filming techniques such as shaking the camera when a contestant fell over to make it look as if their weight had caused the ground to move, were “designed to make you draw conclusions about fat people”, says the author and activist Aubrey Gordon in Fit for TV. When I ask Harper if he thinks the show made fun of fat people, he says he can only speak for himself, but “that’s something I would never do and have never done”.

    I mention a study that showed an increase in anti-fat attitudes after participants had been shown episodes of The Biggest Loser. Harper hasn’t heard of it, but thinks it’s “stupid”. “The trolls that are out there just want to attack in any way, because people are going to have such a strong opinion when it comes to weight loss,” he says. He is keen to share examples of people who have told him they were inspired by The Biggest Loser: “I really do believe that we did help a lot of people.”

    But even if you buy into the show’s “inspirational” message, the fact remains that most of Loser’s contestants regained weight after the competition had ended. When it comes to any kind of diet or fitness regimen, “the success rate overall is very low,” Harper says. “It’s really sad, but it’s such a reality.”

    He is much happier to talk about the show’s “success stories”, like Olivia Ward, who entered season 11 of The Biggest Loser with her sister, Hannah Curlee. She won, with Curlee coming second, and later named her child Harper in honour of the trainer. “I was really touched by that,” Harper says, adding that he and Ward have remained friends: “She’s flying in for my birthday party next Saturday.” Ward “looks better than ever”, he is quick to tell me. “And her sister Hannah, she looks great too.”

    By “great”, he presumably means “slim” – and though Harper says he is “a firm believer that healthy bodies come in many shapes and many sizes”, when I ask whether he agrees with Loser’s simplistic categorisation of thin being good and fat being bad, he says: “Well, fat is bad. Let’s not kid anybody.”

    The show’s trainers: Jennifer Widerstrom, Harper and Dolvett Quince. Photograph: NBC/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal/Getty Images

    Harper knows as well as anybody that those who look fit may still suffer from unexpected health problems. In 2017, at 51, he had what is known as a “widowmaker” heart attack because of an undiagnosed genetic issue, which left him clinically dead on the floor of his gym for nine minutes. Luckily, there was a doctor present who performed CPR, and Harper made it to hospital in time. If it had happened while he was alone in his apartment, he says: “I wouldn’t be here.”

    Having the heart attack “fucked me up”, Harper says. He struggled mentally with going from being the man working out in his 50s who could keep up with 20 and 30-year-olds, to “a person that couldn’t walk around a city block”.

    Plenty of people from The Biggest Loser got in touch when they heard what had happened – but not Michaels. “We weren’t besties, but we were partners on a television show for a very long time,” he says, so it “spoke volumes to me” that she didn’t get in touch. But, he adds: “I would not expect Jillian Michaels to do anything other than what she wants to do.”

    Michaels was always the more headstrong of the show’s original trainers, and she caused controversy in 2013 by giving rule-breaking caffeine pills to her team of contestants. Did Harper ever give his contestants any kind of supplement? “Absolutely not,” he says.

    In any case, the 2013 season marked the beginning of the end for Loser: on top of the furore over the caffeine pills, the show was further criticised when winner Rachel Frederickson appeared in the finale having lost a record-breaking 59.62% of her original body weight, with many viewers believing her weight loss had gone too far.

    He and Michaels “were horrified” when Frederickson appeared on stage for her final weigh-in, Harper says. He thinks her background in competitive swimming led to her extreme approach. “You talk to any person who’s an athlete. That’s a different breed of person,” he says. “And evidently this woman was like, I’m going to win this show and I’m going to do whatever it takes.”

    Yet his “horror” at Frederickson’s extreme weight loss doesn’t seem to have led to much reflection on his involvement in the show that encouraged her behaviour. Granted, he wasn’t Frederickson’s assigned trainer. Nor was he season three contestant Kai Hibbard’s, he points out when I ask him how he feels about reports that Hibbard later developed an eating disorder.

    There has also been criticism from contestants he did train, including Suzanne Mendonca, who appeared on the second season and in 2016 threatened to file a class action lawsuit against the show, complaining that she later regained 150lbs (68kg) , and that during taping she was “dehydrated, vomiting and limited to eating 800 calories a day.”

    Though Harper tries “not to have too many regrets in my life,” he does concede that two moments that are brought up in the documentary – shouting at Gwynn and telling Mendonca that it was “good” when she threw up because it would help her lose weight – were things he “shouldn’t have” done. But, he adds: “You also have to remember, everyone that came on Loser, we were all adults.”

    Well, except for the “kid ambassadors”, junior participants whose weight loss was documented in segments of some of the later seasons. “Oh, I don’t really remember that,” Harper says.

    Does he think the show would get made now? He doesn’t see why not, although he admits: “It would have to be completely different.” But “we as a society are just as obsessed with weight loss as we have ever been,” he says, pointing to the rise of weight-loss drugs. Harper doesn’t necessarily promote those types of drugs, but says he is “for anything that you need to get you on the path that you want to be on”.

    When it comes to his own path, he says he is in his “retirement era”, but is still enjoying teaching hot yoga classes in New York. He is single, having broken off his 2019 engagement to his long-term boyfriend Anton Gutierrez, “so if you know anyone …” he jokes. He is content with the life he has built for himself, and seems unlikely to be affected by conversations about the ethics of Loser that Fit for TV will undoubtedly bring back into focus.

    “I knew what the show represented to me,” he says. “I have nothing but a good experience and really good memories.”

    Fit for TV is on Netflix, from Friday

    Continue Reading

  • BBC Verify Live: Investigating fire at Russia oil refinery and verifying India flood footage

    BBC Verify Live: Investigating fire at Russia oil refinery and verifying India flood footage

    Verified footage shows buildings swept away in north India floodingpublished at 11:04 British Summer Time

    Shruti Menon
    BBC Verify senior journalist

    Image source, Indian Army on X
    Image caption,

    A screengrab from an Indian army video shows the floodwaters rushing through a construction site

    Several parts of northern India have been bit by heavy rainfall and flash flooding since the beginning of this month, causing severe damage across the Himalayan states.

    We’ve verified two dramatic videos from Kinnaur district in Himachal Pradesh state, which shows the moment a flash flood swept through a riverside area on Wednesday evening following a cloudburst.

    In the first video, floodwater is seen rushing into a construction site next to a river where there are buildings with blue roofs. The floodwaters sweep away some of the buildings along with vehicles and construction equipment.

    The second video, filmed moments later, shows those same blue-coloured roofs floating in the water. Several people are seen running to safety, while in the background, water rushes down from the mountains into the river. Those on higher ground can be heard whistling loudly – a signal commonly used in the region to alert people to danger.

    We’ve verified where the footage was filmed by matching the topography and mountain features with Google Earth imagery. Satellite imagery from the specialist company Planet Labs shows the blue-roofed buildings at the location.

    The Indian army has confirmed no-one died in the incident and those affected have been rescued and brought to safety.

    Continue Reading