Blog

  • IAF LOST 1 Rafale Aircraft, French Air Force Boss Confirms; Dassault CEO Blames High-Altitude Tech Failure

    IAF LOST 1 Rafale Aircraft, French Air Force Boss Confirms; Dassault CEO Blames High-Altitude Tech Failure



    The Indian Air Force (IAF) Rafale fighters have been in the eye of the storm since Pakistan claimed to shoot down three jets during the Indo-Pakistan clash in May 2025.

    While India and the manufacturer, Dassault Aviation, have refrained from admitting any losses, the French Air Force Chief has deviated from the course and made an explosive revelation.

    During the latest Indo-Pakistan clash that began on May 7 with India’s ‘Operation Sindoor,’ the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) claimed that it shot down five IAF fighter jets, including three Rafale, using PL-15E long-range missiles launched by the J-10C multi-role combat aircraft. The audacious claims were made without furnishing any evidence.

    These claims, reiterated by Pakistan and amplified by its ally China, have since created a furore, with French officials making desperate attempts to save their most exported military platform from reputation damage that could hit buyer confidence.

    However, in an unusual turn, General Jerome Bellanger, the French Air Force chief, stated that he had seen evidence indicating the loss of three Indian aircraft: a Mirage 2000, a Russian-made Sukhoi, and a Rafale, as reported by The Associated Press.

    India To Reject F-35A, Su-57E Offers From U.S. & Russia; Likely To Opt For Stealth Fighters Based On FGFA

    He added that this is the first-ever combat loss of Rafale, sold to eight countries. “Of course, all those nations that bought Rafales asked themselves questions,” Bellanger was quoted as saying.

    This may also be the first high-level confirmation made by France since the claims were reported, aside from some anonymous claims.

    Earlier, an unnamed high-ranking French intelligence official, cited by CNN, also hinted that Pakistan downed at least one IAF Rafale. The official noted at the time that French authorities were investigating whether additional Rafales had been lost but provided no details.

    India has not specifically detailed its losses, only giving peripheral information. For instance, India’s defense attaché to Indonesia said last month that India lost some fighter jets on the opening day of the conflict due to initial restrictions imposed by the government on striking Pakistani military assets and only aiming for terrorist infrastructure.

    Big Setback For U.S. & Chinese Fighter Jets; One F-16, Three JF-17 Among Others Destroyed By Indian Strikes On Pakistan: Ex-IAF Pilot

    Responding to claims that India lost three Rafales, one MiG-29, and a Sukhoi-30, Captain Shiv Kumar said, “I may not agree that India lost so many aircraft. But I do agree that we did lose some aircraft, and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments and their air defenses.”

    File Image: Rafale Fighter (Photo by Petras Malukas / AFP)

    Earlier, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan had noted that “combat operations involve inevitable losses,” but he did not confirm whether these included Rafales or other aircraft.

    The French Air Chief’s statement might put an end to this ambiguity. However, a French report, quoting Dassault Aviation Chairman and CEO Éric Trappier, stated that India had lost one of its Rafale fighter jets. However, the incident, currently under investigation, was attributed to a high-altitude technical failure rather than an enemy shootdown.

    The report appeared on a French website, Avion De Chasse, saying the incident occurred “at an altitude of over 12,000 meters during an extended training mission, with no enemy involvement or hostile radar contact”.

    “India Lost 120 Aircraft”! How Pakistan Lied During The 1971 War Before “Bitter Facts” Shocked Its Citizens: OPED

    Any loss of Rafales would be a significant setback for the Indian Air Force, which has acquired only 36 of these and is facing an overall depletion in its fighter jet squadron strength. However, the EurAsian Times understands that even if India suffered the loss of a Rafale, the heavy damage inflicted on Pakistan might have been overshadowed by the widespread anti-Rafale campaign.

    Pakistan Suffered A Setback 

    IAF’s Air Marshal AK Bharti said at a briefing during the hostilities that India shot down several Pakistani warplanes, preventing them from entering the country’s airspace. “Their planes were not allowed to fly over our border,” he said. “We definitely shot down several planes, and they have suffered losses on their part.”

    Indian observers, experts, and dedicated military watchers have said that this four-day campaign crippled Pakistan’s aerial capabilities and decimated key command centers.

    According to India’s “unofficial” version, Pakistan appears to have lost three JF-17 Thunders, two Mirage III/V variants, one F-16 Block 52, and one C-130 Hercules transport aircraft.

    Additionally, Pakistan also allegedly lost two high-value surveillance aircraft. An Indian S-400 air defense system reportedly downed a Pakistan Air Force’s Saab Erieye-2000 flying radar. Pakistan lost another Saab Erieye-2000 in an Indian missile strike on Pakistan’s Bholari Air Base, as confirmed by PAF’s ex-Air Marshal.

    File:Pakistan Air Force Pakistan JF-17 Thunder Ramirez-1.jpg - Wikimedia Commons
    Pakistan Air Force JF-17 Thunder – Wikimedia Commons

    It is worth highlighting that an AEW&CS aircraft is considered crucial as it provides real-time surveillance, command, and control over large areas. Its powerful radars can detect warplanes, missiles, and even drones at long ranges, providing critical situational awareness that ground-based radars may struggle to match.

    If that was not all, the PAF also reportedly lost a C-130 Hercules aircraft in an Indian drone strike in Pakistan’s Punjab region, potentially at Nur Khan airbase. As noted by Group Captain MJ Vinod Augustine for the EurAsian Times, “Loss of a heavy-lift transport aircraft during operational tempo drastically reduced Pakistan’s ability to reposition personnel and emergency supplies.”

    Additionally, over 15 Pakistani unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs), including Chinese Wing Loong drones, were destroyed in airspace interceptions and base attacks.

    China Launched Rafale Slander Campaign

    French military and intelligence officials have recently accused China of using its embassies to discredit the Rafale to drive sales of the J-10C, which it has positioned as a cost-effective alternative.

    According to French intelligence findings, defense attachés in China’s foreign embassies spearheaded an effort to sabotage Rafale sales by trying to convince nations that have already ordered the French-made fighter—most notably Indonesia—not to place additional orders and to entice other prospective purchasers to select Chinese-made aircraft.

    Marhaba F-35! Turkey Likely To Dump S-400 For U.S. Stealth Jets; May Sell Russian SAMs To “Rival” India? OPED

    “The Rafale was not randomly targeted. It is a highly capable fighter jet, exported abroad and deployed in a high-visibility theater,” the Defense Ministry wrote on its website. “The Rafale was also targeted because it represents a strategic French offering. By attacking the aircraft, certain actors sought to undermine the credibility of France and its defense industrial and technological base. The disinformation campaign, therefore, did not merely target an aircraft, but more broadly a national image of strategic autonomy, industrial reliability, and solid partnerships.”

    As previously noted by the EurAsian Times, French exports are mainly driven by Rafale. The aircraft has been the mainstay of France’s military arsenal for over twenty years and has become a highly sought-after asset. The sale of Rafales supports the French efforts to improve relations with other countries, particularly in Asia. Experts believe that China is attempting to undermine these efforts, limit French influence in the Indo-Pacific, and utilize it as a stepping stone to advance its position in the export market.

    French intelligence officials claim that the campaign used artificial intelligence (AI)-generated information, video game depictions to mimic alleged fighting, edited photos depicting purported Rafale debris, and viral social media posts. According to French experts who focus on online disinformation, over 1,000 social media profiles that were created when the Indo-Pakistan conflicts broke out also propagated a narrative of Chinese technological dominance.

    Responding to these allegations, the Ministry of National Defense in Beijing said: “The relevant claims are pure groundless rumors and slander. China has consistently maintained a prudent and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability.”

     

    Continue Reading

  • WWE Raw results, recap, grades: LA Knight spoils Seth Rollins’ perfect night

    WWE Raw results, recap, grades: LA Knight spoils Seth Rollins’ perfect night

    When Seth Rollins and Paul Heyman recruited Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed into their group, it was clear a new dominant force had been unleashed on WWE. On Monday night, Rollins and his group made it clear how dangerous they are, though LA Knight stopped things from being perfect for Rollins.

    After Breakker ran through an injured Sami Zayn and Reed put down Jey Uso, Rollins was set to cap off the night in a main event match with Penta. Rollins managed to get the win, but before he and his team could further beat down Penta, Rollins was put down by a BFT from LA Knight, who had managed to sneak into the ring.

    Now, Knight has momentum heading into his match with Rollins at this weekend’s Saturday Night’s Main Event.

    CBS Sports was with you all night with recaps and highlights of all the action from Amica Mutual Pavilion in Providence, Rhode Island.

    LA Knight spoils Seth Rollins’ perfect night

    Rollins, Breakker, Reed and Heyman opened the show with a promo. Breakker was in a rage over how much he hates Zayn and everything Zayn stands for before vowing to end Zayn later in the night. Reed said more or less the same about Uso, saying he would hit Uso with Tsunamis until Uso learned to respect him. Heyman did the mic work for Rollins, vowing that Rollins would take out Penta in their match.

    Bron Breakker def. Sami Zayn via pinfall with a spear. Before the match, Karrion Kross attacked Zayn, hitting him in the ribs with a pipe for the second straight week. Zayn demanded Adam Pearce allow the match to proceed, leading to a dominant Breakker win. Breakker was upset later in the night, saying Kross’ attack would make people think he couldn’t do it on his own. His spirits were lifted a bit when Heyman entered the locker room to tell the crew that Zayn was now indefinitely out of action.

    Jey Uso def. Bronson Reed via disqualification. Reed threw a chair into Uso’s head in the middle of the match, resulting in the referee halting the match. After the disqualification, Reed hit Uso with a pair of Tsunamis before the ring was flooded by WWE officials.

    Seth Rollins def. Penta via pinfall with a stomp. Penta seemingly had the match won when Rollins used a low blow to set up a stomp and secure the pin. After the match, Heyman used his phone to call Breakker and Reed to the ring, but before they arrived, LA Knight snuck into the ring and hit Rollins with a BFT before escaping through the crowd as the show went off the air.

    It was good to give so much of the show to Rollins and his group. They have been dominant, but just in small segments. This made for a night where the focus was on how dangerous they truly are as they picked up three wins — even if Reed technically took a loss — and sent a clear message about their ability to make good on Rollins’ “vision” of the future. Knight’s attack simply served to further build to their Saturday Night’s Main Event match, which still feels like little more than filler. Grade: B+

    What else happened on WWE Raw?

    • Kairi Sane def. Roxanne Perez via pinfall with a backslide. After the match, Raquel Rodriguez and Perez attacked Sane until Asuka ran in to make the save. Sane and Asuka ran off Perez and Rodriguez before celebrating together as the Kabuki Warriors reunited. Later, Adam Pearce told Sane and Asuka that they could represent Raw in the women’s tag title fatal four way match at Evolution.
    • A Nikki Bella video aired with the legend announcing that she was entering the battle royal at Evolution.
    • Lyra Valkyria came out on top after a brawl with Bayley and Becky Lynch. The three women exchanged words ahead of Sunday’s triple threat match for Lynch’s women’s intercontinental championship at Evolution. Things broke down into a fight, which Valkyria won after hitting Nightwing on both Bayley and Lynch.
    • El Grande Americano def. Dragon Lee via pinfall with a diving headbutt after loading his mask. The non-Chad Gable version of Americano was successful despite American Made all being confused as to how Americano could have a match when Gable was injured.
    • Goldberg dropped Gunther with a punch. Gunther cut a promo pointing out that he had been running Goldberg down for weeks with no response. This, Gunther said, proved Goldberg was afraid of him and their match at Saturday Night’s Main Event. This led to Goldberg arriving by car and storming to the ring where he dared Gunther to take a shot. Goldberg blocked the punch and landed one of his own, knocking down the world heavyweight champion. Gunther was able to roll out of the ring to avoid a spear.


    Continue Reading

  • James Gunn Confirms Matt Reeves’ ‘The Batman Part II’ Script Is Done

    James Gunn Confirms Matt Reeves’ ‘The Batman Part II’ Script Is Done

    As the Man of Steel takes to the sky in James Gunn‘s DCU debut, Matt Reeves‘ The Batman is ready to emerge from the shadows.

    On the red carpet of Monday’s Superman world premiere, the writer and director kept it brief as he confirmed to reporters that he’s read Reeves’ long-anticipated script for The Batman Part II.

    “It’s great,” said Gunn after Reeves shared a photo of the completed script’s cover page last month, donning the Batman symbol.

    The DC Studios boss previously told fans to “get off Matt’s nuts” about the sequel to his 2022 take on the Dark Knight.

    Premiering July 11 in theaters, Gunn’s Superman will launch a new DCU with the ‘Gods and Monsters’ phase, separate from Reeves’ ‘Batman Epic Crime Saga’, which includes The Batman (2022) and last year’s Max series spin-off The Penguin.

    After Gunn previously defended the delays on The Batman Part II, which is set to premiere on Oct. 1, 2027 following a year-long postponement, Reeves said in January that the sequel will film this year.

    “We’re doing something where the story continues from, but I hope that people will be surprised by,” he told Deadline.

    Continue Reading

  • Tirzepatide tops the charts for blood sugar and weight loss in type 2 diabetes

    Tirzepatide tops the charts for blood sugar and weight loss in type 2 diabetes

    A major analysis reveals which GLP-1 drugs deliver the best results for glucose control, weight loss, and side effect profiles, offering new clarity for diabetes care decisions.

    Study: Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of T2DM: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Image Credit: ALIOUI MA / Shutterstock

    In a recent study published in the journal Scientific Reports, a group of researchers ranked the glycemic, weight, cardiovascular, and safety outcomes of eight Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) versus placebo and standard antidiabetic drugs in adults with Type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

    Background

    Every ten seconds, someone worldwide develops T2DM, a chronic condition that inflates household medical bills and doubles the risk of heart attack. Global prevalence is projected to climb to 643 million people by 2030, spurring an urgent search for treatments that lower glucose without promoting weight gain.

    GLP-1 RAs stimulate insulin secretion and curb appetite, but clinicians face a crowded shelf of brands differing in dose, duration, and cost. Families, policymakers, and insurers all seek the treatment that maximizes benefits while minimizing drawbacks, highlighting the ongoing need for comparative research.

    About the study

    Investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Network Meta-Analyses statement and registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese databases were searched from inception to 2 October 2024.

    Eligible studies consisted of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults with T2DM that lasted at least eight weeks and compared twice-daily Exenatide (EBID), once-weekly Exenatide (EQW), Semaglutide, Albiglutide, Lixisenatide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, or Tirzepatide against one another, placebo, or conventional antidiabetic therapies such as insulin, metformin, sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, or sulfonylureas.

    The analysis combined oral and injectable Semaglutide into a single category for statistical assessment, reflecting their similar efficacy.

    Reviewers independently undertook study selection, data extraction, and Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment, resolving disagreements by consensus. The analysis first assessed changes from baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG).

    Additional endpoints encompassed body weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), total cholesterol (TC), high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, LDL-C), and any reported adverse events.

    Results were pooled as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Whenever between-study variability (I²) exceeded 50%, a random-effects model was employed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the Chi-squared test.

    Study results

    Sixty-four eligible trials, including 25,572 participants, formed a dense evidence network. Compared to placebo, every GLP-1 RA reduced HbA1c, yet the effect size varied sharply.

    Tirzepatide achieved the greatest absolute drop (MD −2.3 percentage points, 95 % CI −2.7 to −1.9), followed by Semaglutide (−1.5) and Liraglutide (−1.2); Lixisenatide’s reduction of −0.56 ranked last.

    When benchmarked against traditional drugs pooled across insulin, Metformin, Sodium-Dependent Glucose Transporter 2 inhibitors, Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitors, and sulfonylureas, only Tirzepatide (−1.5), Semaglutide (−0.73), Liraglutide (−0.40), Dulaglutide (−0.34), and EQW (−0.36) retained statistical superiority.

    For FPG, the hierarchy was similar: Tirzepatide lowered levels by −3.1 millimoles per liter, Semaglutide by −2.0, and Liraglutide by −1.6 millimoles per liter, compared to placebo; short-acting agents and Albiglutide produced a minimal change. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve analysis assigned Tirzepatide a 100% probability of occupying the top position for both glycemic outcomes.

    The therapies diverged further on weight. Against placebo, Tirzepatide resulted in a weight loss of −9.1 kilograms, Semaglutide −2.8, EBID −1.8, and Liraglutide −1.2; other agents were weight-neutral. Notably, EBID resulted in greater weight loss than liraglutide in this comparison.

    Compared to conventional treatment, every GLP-1 RA except Albiglutide reduced weight, with Dulaglutide and Lixisenatide also demonstrating significant weight reduction. Tirzepatide’s −10 kilograms again led the field.

    Blood Pressure, BMI, and lipid fractions showed no statistically significant differences across interventions, implying that glycemic and weight advantages occur without observed short-term changes in cardiovascular parameters. Albiglutide was found to be ineffective in improving weight outcomes versus traditional drugs.

    Gastrointestinal complaints constituted the dominant safety signal. Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Liraglutide, Lixisenatide, and Tirzepatide each tripled the risk of nausea and vomiting compared to placebo; the risk approximated parity when compared with legacy drugs already notorious for gastrointestinal intolerance.

    Hypoglycemia profiles diverged: EBID and Semaglutide increased episodes (RR 3.3 and 4.6, respectively) relative to placebo, whereas Liraglutide and Lixisenatide significantly reduced the risk compared with traditional regimens.

    Other adverse events, including nasopharyngitis, headache, and elevations in lipase, did not differ materially. Node-splitting and loop inconsistency tests revealed no significant incoherence between direct and indirect evidence, and funnel plots were symmetrical, supporting the credibility of pooled estimates.

    Collectively, the analysis crowned Tirzepatide as the most potent agent for glucose lowering and weight loss, with Semaglutide a consistent runner-up. Tirzepatide’s dual agonism of GIP and GLP-1 receptors may underpin its superior efficacy.

    Liraglutide delivered moderate glycemic benefits coupled with a neutral or protective hypoglycemia footprint, which may be advantageous for leaner or older adults at risk of underweight or hypoglycemia, suggesting a niche for patients intolerant to Semaglutide or at high hypoglycemic risk.

    Short-acting formulations and Albiglutide rarely dominated any outcome, underscoring the clinical shift toward once-weekly or dual-agonist molecules. These rankings remained stable across subgroup and sensitivity analyses, bolstering confidence in their relevance for clinicians.

    Conclusions

    To summarize, long-acting GLP-1 RAs outshine older therapies by combining robust glucose control with meaningful weight loss in adults living with T2DM.

    This NMA shows that Tirzepatide delivers the strongest overall profile, followed closely by Semaglutide, while Liraglutide balances efficacy with the lowest risk of hypoglycemia. Short-acting agents and Albiglutide offer limited additional value. Clinicians should consider a patient’s weight goals, gastrointestinal tolerance, and susceptibility to hypoglycemia when selecting among agents.

    Policymakers and payers can prioritize Tirzepatide or Semaglutide for obesity-related diabetes, reserving Liraglutide for individuals with leaner body types or those who are sensitive to hypoglycemic episodes in everyday clinical practice worldwide.

    Journal reference:

    • Ren, X., Hua, H., Wu, Y. et al. (2025) Efficacy and safety of GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of T2DM: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 15, 2410, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09807-0, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-09807-0

    Continue Reading

  • Indian shares to open muted on tariff jitters; Trump says India deal close – Reuters

    1. Indian shares to open muted on tariff jitters; Trump says India deal close  Reuters
    2. Stocks in news: Titan, J&K Bank, Tata Motors, M&M, JSW Infra  The Economic Times
    3. Stock Market Today: All You Need To Know Going Into Trade On July 8  NDTV Profit
    4. Stock market today: Gift Nifty down 16 pts; key levels for Nifty, Sensex & Nifty Bank  Business Today
    5. Top three stocks to buy today—recommended by Ankush Bajaj for 8 July  Mint

    Continue Reading

  • China’s Renewable Surge: Unlocking the Next Phase of Decarbonization – ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office

    China’s Renewable Surge: Unlocking the Next Phase of Decarbonization – ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office

    China stands at a pivotal point in its climate transition journey. While the road to carbon neutrality remains long and demanding, the country’s rapid and remarkable progress in renewable energy deployment has already started to transform its emissions profile. The key challenge now is to sustain this momentum through deeper decarbonization, especially by tackling key infrastructure and policy constraints.

    Between 2020 and 2024, China experienced strong growth in both energy consumption and carbon emissions, even as overall economic growth slowed. Energy consumption rose by 4.7 percent annually on average, while emissions grew by 3.9 percent, both growing faster than in the preceding five years. These trends have put pressure on meeting China’s interim climate targets under the 14th Five-Year Plan, as energy and carbon intensity reductions are both lagging behind schedule.

    At the core of this dynamic is surging electricity demand. As sectors such as transportation and manufacturing accelerate electrification, electricity consumption has risen by nearly 7 percent annually in recent years. The power and transport sectors now account for most of the country’s emissions growth, while industrial emissions—particularly from steel and cement—have stabilized due to the ongoing property market adjustment.

    Yet, amid this challenge lies a powerful opportunity. China is rapidly emerging as the world’s leading force in renewable energy development. In 2023 and 2024, China added a combined 649 gigawatts of new solar and wind capacity, representing around 60 percent of total global additions. Since 2020, its installed solar and wind capacity has tripled. The electricity generated by renewables reached 1,830 terawatt-hours in 2024, roughly equivalent to the total electricity consumption of China’s entire tertiary sector.

    However, the growth in clean power generation has not fully kept pace with the rapid expansion in installed capacity, and fossil fuels—especially coal—remain a critical backstop for meeting China’s soaring electricity demand. Between 2021 and 2024, approximately 45 percent of incremental power consumption was met by coal or other fossil fuel-based generation.

    This presents a paradox: despite record growth in installed renewables capacity, reliance on fossil generation remains substantial.

    The main constraint is inadequate transmission infrastructure. Many renewable resources are concentrated in remote inland provinces, far from coastal areas which have high power demand, creating geographical imbalances in supply and demand. In contrast to the rapid expansion of renewable generation, investment in power transmission has also been lagging, with total power sector investment falling from 66 percent in 2018 to just 35 percent in 2023.

    As a result, grid limitations are increasingly hindering renewable electricity from reaching end users. Curtailment rates for wind and solar, i.e. the proportion of generated electricity that was wasted or not dispatched due to grid limitations or oversupply, have risen in the past two years, signaling that transmission capacity is struggling to keep pace with generation. Without a stronger grid backbone, much of China’s clean energy potential remains underutilized.

    Addressing this challenge will require stepped-up investment in ultrahigh-voltage transmission lines, smart grid technologies, and energy storage solutions to enhance flexibility and manage intermittency.

    Integrating renewables into grid operations is a necessary first step, but doing that alone would not be sufficient. The recent Spain–Portugal blackout highlights the operational risks associated with rising renewable penetration. To enhance overall grid resilience and ensure system stability, China must also invest in advanced voltage control, synthetic inertia, distributed energy storage, and stronger inter-regional transmission links, gradually reducing its reliance on fossil backup.

    In parallel, deeper reforms in China’s power sector can help ensure clean energy generated is delivered efficiently and fairly. Building a truly integrated national electricity market—through the development of real-time and spot trading platforms, greater regional interconnection, and more flexible electricity pricing—will be essential to maximize the value of clean power. Reforming dispatch protocols to prioritize low-carbon generation and fostering competition across provincial boundaries can further accelerate the green transition.

    The good news is that the turning point may be near. In the first quarter of 2025, the increase in China’s renewable electricity generation outpaced the growth in overall power demand. If this trend continues, China’s power sector emissions could peak this year—a major milestone on the path to reach its 2030 and 2060 climate goals.

    Today, China’s clean energy transformation is already reshaping the global energy system. Its next phase—which is set to emphasize on integration, efficiency, and reform—will determine how quickly and effectively the transformation leads to sustaining emissions reductions.

    If China can align its infrastructure and institutions with the pace of its renewable expansion, the country will not only meet its climate targets, but also set a new global benchmark for how to scale decarbonization in a fast-growing, energy-hungry economy.


    Continue Reading

  • Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 review: Specs, features, price

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 review: Specs, features, price

    The Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD won’t win awards for speed, but it will certainly keep your portable data safe.

    Transferring data between devices can be done in a few ways, but it’s hard to do it securely via offline means. Shifting important documents to a flash drive is convenient, especially for travel, but less so if someone else gains access to it.

    Unless there’s encryption or something else in the way, a stolen drive will leak its secrets with relative ease.

    The Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 tries to solve the portable security issue, by being a personal encrypted Fort Knox for your data.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Design

    Your typical external storage usually consists of an enclosure with a port on one end for you to connect to nearby devices, often over USB. Kingston goes a lot further than that.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: The large screen is used to unlock the drive

    The drive itself is rounded, and has a fairly typical size of at 4.8 inches long, 3.3 inches wide, and 0.7 inches thick. You don’t have any protruding connectors, but you do have a supplied pair of cables to connect to the USB-C port, via both USB-A and USB-C on the host.

    The front also has a mounted touchscreen, which would give casual observers the impression it was an MP3 player. At least, if it didn’t have the IronKey branding right below it.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Protection

    The main selling point of the IronKey Vault Privacy 80 is that it is an encrypted SSD. It’s a drive that has onboard hardware encryption, which works entirely independently of the operating system of the connected device.

    Blue electronic device with a digital keypad on a dark surface. The screen displays numbers, with 'IronKey' branding below. A cable connects to the top.
    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Unlocking the drive by entering a code on the screen

    That is to say, it doesn’t matter what device you connect the drive to, so long as it can support a USB mass storage device. The IronKey handles the security for itself.

    This security includes XTS-AES 256-bit encryption using a Common Criteria EAL5+ certified secure microprocessor. All that is also certified to FIPS 197, too.

    In use, the display is the main interaction point for the drive, in terms of security. You connect it to a host computer, then you enter a passcode onto the display.

    To prevent anyone from brute force attacking the drive, a process will automatically crypto-erase the drive if the Admin and User passwords are wrongly entered 15 times in a row. This is just the default, as you can adjust this from 10 tries to 30 tries.

    Blue IronKey data device with a screen displaying a lock symbol and status updates. Connected by a cable on a dark surface.
    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: The drive is readable, but a tap will re-lock it

    The password used with the drive can be between six characters and up to 64 characters in length. The user can also set up password rules affecting the letters and numbers used.

    For business environments, there’s also the option to set up multiple passwords, so that an admin can have access to all of the features and settings.

    Users can also set up an automatic timeout, locking the drive after a selected period of time. This is handy for situations such as if someone leaves the drive hooked up to a computer, to prevent any impromptu snooping of the data.

    Going further into being protective, there are options for randomize touch-screen layouts to prevent others from watching someone tapping codes in from afar. A dual read-only mode uses two levels of protection to prevent the writing of data.

    There’s also a digitally-signed firmware to protect against BadUSB attacks.

    The drive comes formatted in exFAT.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Connectivity and storage

    Connecting using USB 3.2 Gen 1, which has a maximum throughput of 5Gbps, the IronKey Vault Privacy 80 is offered in multiple sizes. AppleInsider was provided with a 7,680GB capacity, though others are available with 960GB, 1,920GB, and 3,840GB.

    The actual connection speed of the drive itself is a bit lower than that theoretical maximum of 10 gigabit per second USB-C. With 250MB/s reads and 250MB/s writes on average, it’s not what you’d call a fast SSD.

    It still has the advantages of no hard drive platter seek time, but don’t expect Thunderbolt speed.

    And, that’s fine for what the drive is for.

    Disk speed test interface showing write speed at 296.9 MB/s, read speed at 212.9 MB/s, alongside a compatibility checklist for video formats and performance metrics.
    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Speed testing using Black Magic’s Disk Speed Test

    While slow compared to other SSDs, you do need to bear in mind that our tested speeds are with a fully-encrypted drive. It’s safe to say that it’s not going to be a drive used by anyone who needs fast access to stored materials.

    Content creators aren’t going to be editing from this drive, but they are also not the target market.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: Tough, for those who really need it

    Secure external password-protected storage drives are certainly a limited market, but one that also has a lot of customers. With data protection being a thing enterprise customers seek due to various online and in-person threats, companies still want drives that are portable yet highly secure.

    Black rectangular case with a blue zipper, featuring the white 'Ironkey' logo on the front, set against a plain background.
    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review: The bag supplied with the drive

    The IronKey Vault Privacy 80 is small enough to be portable, offers enough capacity to be useful for large data troves, and with a considerable amount of security to boot.

    This is not a drive that the average consumer will really need, but it’s great to toss in a safety deposit box with crucial backups. For business users, it’s a drive that can easily become part of a security framework for highly sensitive projects.

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review – Pros

    • Highly secure
    • Compact
    • Color touch screen with high accuracy

    Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD review – Cons

    • Relatively slow transfer speeds
    • Price is high, but warranted

    Rating: 4 out of 5

    The IronKey Vault Privacy 80 does what it says it will do. It will security vault data that isn’t speed-critical, and will do it without depending on one OS or another. Not everybody needs something like this, but if you’ve got a key set of data that you just can’t let fall into the wrong hands, this will keep it safe for you.

    Where to buy the Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 Encrypted External SSD

    The Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 is available from Amazon, starting from $279.99 for the 960GB model, with the 1.92TB at $369.99, the 3.8TB at $762.99, and the 7.6TB at $1,037.99. Current discounts as of July 7, 2025 price the 960GB model at $239.99, and the 1.92TB at $289.99.

    Continue Reading

  • Measles-infected person visited Osaka Expo on June 21; visitors with symptoms urged to seek medical advice

    Measles-infected person visited Osaka Expo on June 21; visitors with symptoms urged to seek medical advice