- The stock-market rally is broadening beyond Big Tech. Will consumer stocks bounce back in the second half of the year? MarketWatch
- The S&P 500 And Nvidia Hit New Highs, But Rotation Trades Are Smarter Seeking Alpha
- Small caps, energy, and banks feels the love as Wall Street goes cold on Big Tech MSN
- More Stocks Join the Surge, Signaling More Upside Ahead AInvest
- Signs of a ‘broader, healthier’ market start to emerge at the start of the second half of 2025, says one strategist MarketWatch
Blog
-
The stock-market rally is broadening beyond Big Tech. Will consumer stocks bounce back in the second half of the year? – MarketWatch
-
The stock-market rally is broadening beyond Big Tech. Will consumer stocks bounce back in the second half of the year?
By Isabel Wang
Tech can’t take all the credit for the stock market’s record rally into a ‘broader, healthier market’ heading into the second half of 2025
After months of leadership by megacap technology stocks, Wall Street kicked off the second half of 2025 with a powerful, yet potentially healthier, shift in the U.S. stock market, as the rally has broadened.
From cyclicals to small caps, more stocks have been joining the charge that has sent the S&P 500 SPX and the Nasdaq Composite COMP to new all-time highs, suggesting that this market’s recovery from April lows may have deeper roots than many anticipated.
Investors have begun rotating out of richly valued technology names and into cyclical sectors when the calendar turned to the second half of the year. The S&P 500’s materials sector XX:SP500.15 was the best performer among the large-cap index’s 11 sectors last week, up 3.6%, while the S&P 500 only rose 1.7%. The financials XX:SP500.40 and energy XX:SP500.10 sectors also gained 2.4% and 2.1% in the same period, respectively, according to FactSet data.
Small-cap stocks also have shown signs of rebounding in the second half. The benchmark Russell 2000 index RUT has popped 3.5% so far this month, outperforming other major large-cap equity indexes. The small-cap index on Thursday also closed in the green for 2025 for the first time since Feb. 20, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
“While the ‘buy everything’ approach worked really well off the April lows, and part of that was simply just a mean reversion trade after tech got asymmetrically punished … so going forward, stock selection is going to be more important and other areas of the market are starting to catch a bid,” said Talley Leger, chief market strategist for the Wealth Consulting Group.
The broadening of the tech rally beyond the so-called Magnificent Seven cohort is a sign of “a broader, healthier market,” he said.
Consumer in focus
Meanwhile, some sectors that lagged in the year’s first half could be poised for a meaningful rebound in the rest of 2025.
The S&P 500’s consumer-discretionary sector XX:SP500.25 was at the bottom of the large-cap index’s 11 sectors in the first six months of 2025, off 4.2% to log its worst first-half performance in three years, according to FactSet data.
However, a look beneath the surface shows the story wasn’t so bleak: Many consumer-related stocks have held steady, and U.S. consumers might be in better shape than sector performance suggests.
The S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index XX:SP500EW.25 – which gives equal value to all 51 stocks that are included in the sector, regardless of the size of the company – has actually risen 2.5% this year, according to FactSet data.
Of course, Tesla Inc. (TSLA) – one of the largest-weighted stocks in the S&P 500’s consumer discretionary sector – has been largely to blame. Comprising 18.6% of the total assets within the market-cap-weighted sector index, shares of Tesla have tumbled nearly 22% this year, as weak EV sales, lower demand, intensifying competition from other automakers and Elon Musk’s political involvement have rattled investors.
See: Opinion: Elon Musk takes us for fools as he renews his verbal assault on Trump
Another megacap tech name – Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) – accounts for roughly 42% of the weighting in the discretionary sector, but its shares have remained relatively steady, rising 1.8% year to date, according to FactSet data.
To be sure, Tesla and Amazon stand on their own perch within the consumer-discretionary sector, which also includes restaurant chains, apparel, luxury goods and travel stocks. Among those are McDonald’s Corp. (MCD), Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and Airbnb Inc. (ABNB), which all can rise in a resilient economy and labor market when consumers tend to spend more, but fall when unemployment rises.
See: The June jobs report is grimy under the hood. Here’s the down and dirty.
Watch the jobs market
The U.S. economy added a stronger-than-expected 147,000 jobs in June, and the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1% from 4.2%, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released Thursday. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan’s closely watched gauge of U.S. consumer sentiment rose to 60.5 in a preliminary June reading from 52.2 in the prior month. This was the first improvement in six months.
The Wealth Consulting Group’s Leger sees the previously negative consumer sentiment as a potential buying opportunity for the consumer-discretionary sector (see chart below).
“The connection between the University of Michigan consumer-sentiment index and the performance of the consumer-discretionary sector fell into the contrarian buy zone on our radar when everything was at its worst [in April]. Now they are rebounding off those lows, and sentiment or morale is improving,” he told MarketWatch via phone on Wednesday.
In Leger’s view, the surging stock market also adds to “the wealth effect,” which could increase consumer spending power. That, along with the improving consumer sentiment, falling oil prices, cooling headline inflation and potential interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve later this year “should release more money for spending on discretionary items,” and “help brighten the earnings outlook” for the sector, he said.
However, Marta Norton, chief investment strategist at Empower Investments, said it’s still too early to “make heads or tails” of consumers’ emotions, as even the potential tariff threat doesn’t feel as concerning as it did when it first made headlines a few months ago.
Americans cut spending in May after buying lots of new cars and other goods earlier in the year to beat U.S. tariffs, underscoring how ongoing trade wars are disrupting the economy. Personal spending fell 0.1% in May, the government said in a June 27 report. It was the first decline since January.
“I wouldn’t describe the consumer as unhealthy at all,” Norton said, but added there has been a marginal deterioration this year. “There is still a certain measure of uncertainty around what that trade policy ultimately looks like,” she said. That also casts a shadow over the long run for earnings of discretionary stocks.
Yet despite recent weakness, the consumer-discretionary sector remains expensive on a price-to-forward-earnings (P/E) basis. The forward P/E multiple of the discretionary sector, calculated by dividing its current price by Wall Street analysts’ consensus estimate for its earnings per share (EPS) for the next 12 months, was pegged at 29.07 as of Wednesday afternoon, up from around 22.56 on April 8. Furthermore, the equal-weighted version of the discretionary index was trading at 17.57 times forward P/E, compared with 13.7 in early April, according to FactSet.
When you add in that the sector’s not necessarily cheap, and that tariff headwinds remain, Norton said it looks tough to see a catalyst for meaningful moves higher for consumer-discretionary stocks.
U.S. stocks finished higher on Thursday as investors digested the June employment report. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA jumped nearly 0.8%, ending only 0.4% off its prior record. The S&P 500 ended up 0.8%, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 1%, with both scoring fresh record closes, according to FactSet data.
Major U.S. stock exchanges were closed on Friday for the July 4 holiday.
-Isabel Wang
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
07-06-25 0830ET
Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Continue Reading
-
Victor Gyokores transfer news: Arsenal in talks to sign striker
Arsenal are in talks to sign Sporting’s prolific Sweden striker Viktor Gyokeres.
As first revealed by BBC Sport on Thursday, Arsenal have had a clear focus on completing a deal for the 27-year-old in recent days and the club are now advancing in their pursuit of the forward.
Discussions over personal terms for Gyokeres and with the Lisbon club over a transfer fee are accelerating, with Arsenal’s sporting director Andrea Berta leading negotiations.
A deal has not been finalised though, and there remains a degree of caution at Arsenal until agreements are reached.
Gyokeres has been heavily linked with a move to the Premier League after scoring 97 goals in 102 matches during two seasons in Portugal.
The Gunners completed the £60m signing of Martin Zubimendi from Real Sociedad on Sunday.
But the movement towards a deal for Gyokeres represents a significant development in Arsenal’s summer transfer business given a new striker was the club’s main priority.
It is expected that Gyokeres, who spent three years as a youngster at Brighton and whose career took off during two seasons at Coventry City, would cost about £70m.
Continue Reading
-
Woman who livestreamed Kneecap Glastonbury set targeted by online abuse | Kneecap
A woman who livestreamed Kneecap’s Glastonbury festival set to 2 million people on TikTok has described the “obscene” abuse she says has received in the aftermath, including people calling her a Nazi.
Helen Wilson, a Swansea-based yoga teacher who also runs the Ground Plant Based Coffee cafe, said she had been sent a lot of personal insults, but that she had received “hundreds and hundreds times more support than negativity”.
It came after she held up her phone in the crowd to stream the set by the Irish rap trio last Saturday, which the BBC refused to show live, over what it said were efforts to ensure it “meets our editorial guidelines”.
The BBC later made an edited version available on iPlayer, though the broadcaster did not respond to the Guardian when asked what had been cut out.
Wilson said: “I just thought, I’m just going to livestream it because the BBC aren’t showing it. And I really disagreed with that. I did not think for a moment that over 2 million people would see it.”
It was only her second TikTok live stream on her handle HelenWilsonWales – her first, about her weight loss, had no viewers at all – and initially she had not realised how many people were watching because the sun was shining on her phone screen.
“But I could see that when you’re doing a live stream, loads of messages pop up and people can talk to you. So the screen was going mental. People were just like ping, ping, ping, ping, ping, ping, ping, ping.
“And I was like: ‘Oh, my god, something’s happening here,’ and so I just knew I had to carry on. People were saying to me: ‘Please keep going, do what you can, please keep going.’ And then that was it,” said Wilson, who grew up in Somerset and was working at the festival.
The stream was spreading through word of mouth, as viewers sent it to their friends and family, and Wilson found out later that at one point it was playing on a big screen in a pub in the band’s home town.
She told the Guardian: “I have had a lot of trolling. When you rang, I was just in the middle of deleting some obscene comments off my business Facebook page.”
“There was somebody on Instagram just saying he sent me a message saying: ‘You’re just a wrinkled old woman looking for attention.’”
“[In a tabloid newspaper] I’ve been referred to as a middle-aged woman. Like, what has that got to do with anything?” said the 44-year-old.
She said: “This is about the genocide in Palestine, and this is about the failure of our government to act, to do anything about it.”
Wilson added: “More people need to know what is going on in Palestine. And we shouldn’t be censoring bands under freedom of speech, full stop. We shouldn’t be censoring anybody who is trying to raise awareness of the atrocities that are taking place.”
Afterwards, Kneecap called her a “legend” and offered her free tickets to any of their shows.
On Saturday, while supporting Fontaines DC in Finsbury Park, the band once again led 45,000 people in chants of “fuck Keir Starmer”.
The band were far from alone in their sentiments at Glastonbury – dozens of acts and figures at the festival spoke out in support of Palestine, including CMAT, the Libertines, Gary Lineker, Joy Crookes, TV on the Radio, Sorry and Paloma Faith.
Kneecap were also backed by Emily and Michael Eavis, the festival’s organisers, with Emily telling the BBC that “everyone is welcome”, before their set.
Continue Reading
-
Multisensory VR forest reboots your brain and lifts mood—study confirms
In Japan, Shinrin Yoku or forest bathing has already been used for therapeutic applications, for instance, to lower blood pressure and stress levels. For their study, the researchers wanted to find out whether forest bathing – consciously immersing oneself in nature – can also be effective when done virtually, and focused on whether the positive effect is stronger when several senses are addressed simultaneously.
For the project, a high-quality 360° VR video was produced in Europe’s largest Douglas fir forest, the Sonnenberg nature reserve near Parchim – complete with original sounds and the scent of essential oils from the Douglas fir. The participants experienced the virtual forest scenery either as a full sensory experience (with images, sound and scent) or in a reduced form whereby forest stimuli appealing to just a single sense – visual, auditory or olfactory – were used. In variants where only hearing or scent was activated, participants were placed in a neutral virtual environment to minimize visual stimuli and the influence of VR technology.
Significantly better effect with sensory combination
More than 130 participants were first put into an acute stress situation using stress-inducing images. Then, equipped with VR glasses, they experienced one of the four forest stimulation/ bathing variants. The results show that the combination of all three sensory stimuli led to a significantly greater improvement in mood and a stronger feeling of connection with nature compared to when individual sensory stimuli were presented. In addition to positive effects on mood, there were also limited improvements in working memory – the cognitive function that enables us to store, process and retrieve information in the short term.
However, the researchers point out that the effects are area-specific and cannot yet be considered universally valid. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the results and provide a better understanding of the mechanisms behind the restorative effects of virtual nature experiences.
“We can already say that digital nature experiences can absolutely produce an emotional effect – even if they don’t replace actual nature,” reports Leonie Ascone, lead author of the study and researcher in the Neuronal Plasticity working group at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE).
Potential for clinics, waiting rooms and urban spaces
Simone Kühn, head of the study and Director of the Center for Environmental Neuroscience at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, adds: “Especially in places with limited access to nature – such as clinics, waiting areas or urban interiors – multisensory VR applications or targeted nature staging could support mental well-being. The images, sounds and scents of nature offer previously underestimated potential for improving mood and mental performance in everyday situations.” Kühn conducts intensive research into the effects of the environment on the human brain and, together with colleagues from universities in Vienna, Exeter and Birmingham, was recently able to prove that just from watching nature videos, patients perceive physical pain as less intense (Steininger et al., 2025).
In brief:
- Forest bathing in Virtual Reality improves emotional well-being and increases connectedness to nature, particularly when several senses (sight, hearing, smell) are simultaneously engaged
- The study used a 360° VR forest video complete with original sounds and the scent of Douglas fir essential oils
- There is potential for application especially in clinical, urban and other environments with limited access to nature
Continue Reading
-
Got $1,000? 2 Cryptocurrencies to Buy and Hold for Decades
Many cryptocurrencies skyrocketed during the buying frenzy for speculative investments in 2020 and 2021. That rally was fueled by near-zero interest rates, stimulus checks, social media buzz, and commission-free trading platforms. But in 2022 and 2023, many of those tokens crashed as interest rates rose and a new crypto winter began.
Over the past year and a half, investors have gradually pivoted back toward cryptocurrencies as interest rates declined and President Donald Trump’s crypto-friendly administration took the helm. So if you’re still bullish on cryptocurrencies, it might be a great time to go shopping again.
Image source: Getty Images. You shouldn’t stake your life savings in cryptocurrencies, but it might be smart to set aside a modest $1,000 in a few tokens that could soar over the next few decades. I’d personally stick with the two largest cryptocurrencies — Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) and Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) — instead of the smaller and more speculative meme coins.
Bitcoin, the world’s most valuable cryptocurrency, still has plenty of upside potential for a few simple reasons. First, it’s still mined with an energy-intensive proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, which becomes more costly every four years with each “halving” that cuts its mining rewards in half. Its maximum supply is also capped at 21 million tokens. Nearly 19.9 million of those Bitcoins have already been mined, and the final token is expected to be mined in 2140. There isn’t much room for long-term inflation in this model.
Bitcoin’s increasingly difficult mining process, scarcity, and deflationary nature make it more comparable to gold, silver, and other physical assets than many other cryptocurrencies. That makes it a potential hedge against inflation and the devaluation of fiat currencies.
Bitcoin’s first spot price exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which were approved in January 2024, made it easier for retail and institutional investors to invest in the coin without a crypto wallet. Big companies like MicroStrategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) continued to accumulate Bitcoin, the Trump administration recently established a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and inflation-wracked countries like El Salvador and Central African Republic even adopted Bitcoin as a national currency for a while. All of those developments supported the notion that Bitcoin was becoming “digital gold.”
Continue Reading
-
Paleontologists Unearth New Species of “Mystery” Dinosaur – SciTechDaily
- Paleontologists Unearth New Species of “Mystery” Dinosaur SciTechDaily
- New dinosaur species unveiled at London’s Natural History Museum Yahoo
- This Dinosaur Was the Speed Demon of the Jurassic Era—And It Was the Size of a Dog! The Daily Galaxy
- Natural History Museum’s new dinosaur specimen acquired from London dealer David Aaron Antiques Trade Gazette
- ‘New To Science’ Species Of Dinosaur Goes On Display At London’s Natural History Museum Yahoo
Continue Reading
-
Reuters X accounts ‘withheld’ in India: local media – World
The Reuters news agency’s X account handles were “withheld” in India “in response to a legal demand”, Indian outlet The Print reported on Sunday.
The accounts for both Reuters and Reuters World were inaccessible in India; however, users were still able to access 30 other Reuters accounts, The Print added. The Reuters news website is also accessible.
X users in India have posted screenshots showing that they are unable to access the news agency’s accounts.
Reuters has yet to issue a statement, while the Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) told India Today that no order was given to restrict the accounts.
“There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem,” an official spokesperson for the ministry told outlet India Today.
The Print reported that in previous instances of X restricting access to accounts in India due to legal requirements, the platform issued statements through its Global Government Affairs handle.
The account has yet to issue a statement on the restriction.
This is not the first time India has blocked accounts on the platform, formerly known as Twitter.
According to an Instagram post by The Hindustan Times, the accounts were withheld as per orders issued amid Operation Sindoor, when India launched missiles at sites in Pakistan in May.
“The centre (government) has reportedly responded to social media platform X blocking the account of news agency Reuters in India, saying that it is a mistake on the part of the Elon Musk-owned company,” the outlet wrote in the post’s caption.
According to The Print, X issued a statement on May 8 saying it had “received executive orders from the Indian government” to “block over 8,000 accounts in India, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment of the company’s local employees”.
“In most cases, the Indian government has not specified which posts from an account have violated India’s local laws. For a significant number of accounts, we did not receive any evidence or justification to block the accounts,” X wrote.
Though X stated that it disagreed with New Delhi’s demands, the platform withheld access to the account solely within India.
Continue Reading
-
Neuroscientists detect decodable imagery signals in brains of people with aphantasia
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.
A new brain imaging study published in Current Biology has uncovered surprising neural activity in people with aphantasia—a condition where individuals report being unable to form mental images. Although they describe a complete absence of visual imagery, their brains still show patterns of activity in the early visual cortex when they attempt to imagine visual stimuli. However, this activity differs in important ways from what’s seen in people who do experience vivid mental imagery, offering insight into how consciousness might be linked to sensory representations in the brain.
Aphantasia is a relatively newly defined condition in which people are unable to form mental images voluntarily. While those with aphantasia can describe objects and scenes using words or concepts, they report no visual “pictures” in the mind’s eye. Since much of what is known about mental imagery comes from people who can generate vivid images, the researchers wanted to know what happens in the brain when someone with aphantasia tries to visualize something. Do they engage the same brain regions, or are there deeper differences in how their brains represent imagined information?
To answer these questions, the research team compared people with aphantasia to individuals with typical visual imagery using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The goal was to examine how both groups activated early visual brain regions—especially the primary visual cortex—during attempts to visualize simple stimuli. The researchers focused on whether the brain could still represent specific content in people who lack a subjective visual experience.
The study involved 14 participants with verified aphantasia and 18 control participants with typical imagery. All were right-handed and had normal or corrected vision. Participants completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire to assess their subjective imagery, and their imagery ability was further validated using an objective task called the binocular rivalry paradigm. This method measures how imagining a visual pattern affects what people perceive shortly afterward. As expected, those with aphantasia scored near the floor on the vividness questionnaire and showed little or no sensory bias in the binocular rivalry task, confirming that they lacked typical imagery experience.
In the main experiment, the researchers used fMRI to measure brain activity while participants either viewed or attempted to imagine simple visual patterns—specifically colored Gabor patches—at specific locations on a screen. Each participant completed several types of scans: imagery generation, passive viewing, retinotopic mapping to define visual areas, and region-of-interest localization to pinpoint the parts of the brain involved in processing the stimuli. During the imagery task, participants received a visual cue indicating which pattern to imagine and where to place it in the visual field. After each attempt, they rated how vivid their imagery had felt.
Although people with aphantasia gave extremely low vividness ratings—averaging around 1 on a 1-to-4 scale—their brain activity told a more complex story. In both groups, fMRI signals from early visual areas could be used to decode what kind of pattern a person was trying to imagine. In other words, the brain still encoded specific information about the content of the imagery—even in the absence of subjective experience.
But there were clear differences in how that information was represented. In people with typical imagery, activity in the visual cortex showed expected patterns: stronger responses in the hemisphere opposite to the side of the visual field where the stimulus was imagined. In contrast, people with aphantasia showed the reverse: stronger responses in the same-side hemisphere (ipsilateral) instead of the opposite (contralateral). This suggests a different functional organization of visual activity during imagery attempts.
While the imagery content could be decoded in both groups, only in the control group did the patterns of brain activity overlap between imagery and actual perception. In the control group, algorithms trained on imagery-related brain data could accurately identify visual stimuli seen during passive viewing—and vice versa. This kind of cross-decoding failed in the aphantasia group. Their visual cortex did encode information about imagery attempts, but those patterns did not match those generated during real visual perception.
This mismatch might explain why people with aphantasia experience no visual imagery even though their brains generate structured representations during imagery tasks. According to the researchers, the results point to a difference not just in the strength of visual signals, but in their format. The activity in the visual cortex of people with aphantasia appears to be “less sensory,” meaning it may lack the specific qualities that give rise to conscious visual experience.
The researchers also looked at broader brain networks. During imagery attempts, people with aphantasia showed stronger activity in brain regions associated with language and auditory processing, such as the superior temporal gyri. They also had weaker functional connections between these regions and visual areas. This could indicate that when people with aphantasia try to visualize, they may rely more on verbal or conceptual strategies rather than generating vivid internal images.
To test whether differences in attention or effort might explain the results, the researchers ran a follow-up study with control participants. These individuals were asked to imagine either a clear or blurry version of the same visual patterns. Their reported effort levels and brain activation were similar across both conditions, suggesting that differences in subjective clarity do not necessarily reflect differences in cognitive effort. This makes it less likely that the patterns seen in aphantasia are simply due to lower motivation or task engagement.
Although the findings shed new light on the neural basis of aphantasia, the authors note several limitations. The sample size was relatively small, especially given the rarity of aphantasia, and most participants in both groups were women. Also, while the study focused on low-level visual features, it did not examine whether similar results would hold for more complex images, such as faces or scenes. The absence of eye-tracking during scanning means researchers could not fully rule out whether subtle eye movements influenced the neural signals.
But the results still offer evidence that people with aphantasia can generate structured, content-specific activity in the visual cortex, even though they lack a conscious image. This dissociation between brain activity and experience challenges long-held assumptions that activity in early visual areas is directly tied to visual awareness. Instead, it suggests that not all neural representations are created equal—some may carry enough sensory information to generate conscious images, while others may not.
The study opens new avenues for understanding the neural basis of mental imagery and visual consciousness. Future research could explore what kinds of information are encoded in the brain during imagery attempts in aphantasia, and whether different feedback connections in the brain might account for the altered representations.
The study, “Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding,” was authored by Shuai Chang, Xinyu Zhang, Yangjianyi Cao, Joel Pearson, and Ming Meng.
Continue Reading
-
Faith Kipyegon and Beatrice Chebet smash world records at an extraordinary Diamond League meeting
CNN
—
Kenya’s Faith Kipyegon and Beatrice Chebet both set new world records on Saturday at an extraordinary Diamond League meeting in Eugene, Oregon.
Kipyegon, who fell short in her quest to become the first woman in history to run a four-minute mile last month, bounced back in impressive style to break her own women’s 1,500m world record with a time of 3:48.68.
She dominated the race, holding off Australia’s Jessica Hull who stuck with her until the back straight, eventually winning by almost three seconds.
As Kipyegon crossed the line, the crowd erupted, knowing she had shaved 0.36 seconds off the world record, while she turned and pointed back towards the clock before wrapping herself in a Kenyan flag.
Earlier in the meet, also known as the Prefontaine Classic, Chebet obliterated the 5,000m world record by more than two seconds, becoming the first woman to complete the distance in under 14 minutes.
She crossed the line in 13:58.06, more than three seconds ahead of Agnes Jebet Ngetich in second place, who recorded the third-fastest time in history.
Gudaf Tsegay, the previous world record holder, finished the race in third place with a time of 14:04.41.
Chebet had already broken the 14-minute barrier on the road in January when she completed the race in 13:54.
“I’m so happy,” Chebet said afterward. “In Rome (where she recorded a time of 14:03.69), I was just running to win a race. After Rome, I say that I am capable of running a world record so let me go back home and prepare … I told myself, ‘if Faith is trying for a world record in Eugene, why not me too?’”
“It’s a good track for me,” she added, referencing her previous success in Eugene where she broke the women’s 10,000m world record last year.
Now, Chebet holds the 5,000m and 10,000m women’s world records as well as the Olympic titles in both events.
Elsewhere at the meet, Mondo Duplantis comfortably won the men’s pole vault but failed to raise his own world record, hitting the bar on all three of his attempts to clear 6.29m.
Continue Reading