Blog

  • First UK Patients Receive Diabetes Drug That Delays Symptoms by Years : ScienceAlert

    First UK Patients Receive Diabetes Drug That Delays Symptoms by Years : ScienceAlert

    For more than a century, type 1 diabetes has meant one thing: a lifetime administering insulin.

    But for the first time, science is breaking that paradigm – not by managing the disease, but by intercepting it before symptoms even appear.

    As the first patients in the UK begin receiving the groundbreaking new therapy, teplizumab, we are developing ways to identify who might benefit from a drug that only works if given before any symptoms appear.

    At the Royal Devon NHS, we are currently treating the first UK adult, Hannah Robinson, who was found to have early type 1 diabetes by chance during routine pregnancy screening.

    Related: New Treatment May Cure Severe Type 1 Diabetes, Study Finds

    About 10% of people with diabetes have type 1, while the remaining 90% have type 2, a condition linked to lifestyle factors where insulin is still produced but does not work properly.

    Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune condition that leads to complete loss of insulin production from the pancreas. Without insulin, blood sugar levels rise dangerously, increasing the risk of blindness, kidney failure and early death.

    The pancreas produces insulin, which helps cells absorb glucose from the blood. (Science Photo Library/Canva)

    Although type 1 is often thought of as a disease of childhood, research from the University of Exeter has highlighted that more than half of all new cases occur in adults.

    For millions around the world living with type 1 diabetes, treatment to keep blood sugar in check means lifelong daily insulin. However, using insulin comes with its own risks.

    If blood sugar drops too low, it can cause hypoglycaemia, or “hypos”, which in severe cases may lead to seizures or even death. It is no surprise that constantly balancing between high and low blood sugars takes a heavy toll on both physical and mental health. During her pregnancy, Robinson needed insulin and saw firsthand how “life completely revolves around balancing your blood glucose”.

    Teplizumab offers a completely different approach. Instead of simply replacing insulin, it targets the immune attack that causes type 1 diabetes.

    Our immune system is usually remarkably good at telling friend from foe, protecting us from infections and cancer while leaving our own organs alone. But sometimes, for reasons still not fully understood, this balance breaks down in a process known as autoimmunity.

    In type 1 diabetes, the immune system mistakenly attacks the pancreas, destroying insulin-producing cells.

    YouTube Thumbnail frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=”allowfullscreen”>
    Diabetes symptoms.

    Teplizumab works by retraining the immune system and dialling down the specific cells that target the pancreas. Studies show it can delay the disease and the need for insulin therapy by two to three years, with generally mild side-effects.

    For Robinson, who knows all too well from pregnancy and the full-time job that is living with type 1 diabetes, the possibility of a few extra years without insulin really mattered.

    The drug is already approved in the US and is under review for routine NHS use, although a few children and teenagers in the UK have also received it through special access programmes.

    Finding people early

    There is a catch. By the time people develop symptoms of type 1 diabetes, such as thirst, weight loss and fatigue, more than three-quarters of their insulin-producing capacity is already destroyed.

    For teplizumab and similar therapies to work, they need to be given before symptoms appear, while blood sugar levels are still normal. This means these treatments are not an option for people who already have established type 1 diabetes.

    So how do we find people at this early stage? Fortunately, it is possible to detect the beginnings of the autoimmune attack many years before symptoms show using simple blood tests that measure immune markers called pancreatic autoantibodies.

    Just a few drops from a finger prick can reveal whether the immune system has started to target the pancreas. Finding people early not only offers the chance to delay disease progression, it can also help avoid the life-threatening emergencies that sometimes come with a first diagnosis – such as diabetic ketoacidosis.

    With type 1 diabetes affecting roughly one in 200 people, there is still the question of who to test. Not everyone’s risk is the same. When we think of inherited diseases, we often imagine conditions caused by a single gene change, such as cystic fibrosis.

    Type 1 diabetes does have a genetic component, but it involves many different genes, each nudging a person’s risk up or down. Having genetic risk alone is not enough, with unknown environmental factors also needed to tip the balance.

    Nine in ten people who develop type 1 diabetes have no family history. While testing relatives of people with type 1 is a logical first step, research at the University of Exeter suggests that combining all these genetic factors into a single risk score could help predict who might develop the disease and identify babies who should be monitored more closely.

    This could become an important tool as we move towards wider genomic screening.

    It is still early days, but we are seeing a fundamental shift in how we approach type 1 diabetes. For more than a century, treatment has meant patients taking on the daily burden of replacing the insulin their bodies can no longer make.

    Now, the focus is turning to therapies that tackle the immune problem at its source, with the hope of stopping the disease before it fully develops and opening the door to an insulin-free future.The Conversation

    Richard Oram, Professor of Diabetes and Nephrology, University of Exeter and Nicholas Thomas, Clinical Lecturer, Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Exeter

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Continue Reading

  • How to get free Windows 10 security updates through October 2026: Two ways

    How to get free Windows 10 security updates through October 2026: Two ways

    MicroStockHub/Getty Images

    With just a few months remaining until the Windows 10 end-of-support date, Microsoft seems to have belatedly realized that owners of tens of millions of consumer PCs running Windows 10 aren’t ready to replace their old computers, and they’re also not about to fork over $30 for a one-year Extended Security Updates (ESU) subscription.

    So, at the end of June, just days before the end of its fiscal year, the company waved the white flag and announced new “free enrollment options” for the ESU program, along with a description of the steps customers will need to follow to sign up. Anyone willing to try out Microsoft’s cloud-based Windows Backup or spend a few minutes per day with the Bing search engine over the course of a week can avoid the $30 tariff and get that subscription for free using the enrollment wizard shown here.

    enroll-in-esu-pitch

    Microsoft is offering a year’s worth of free security updates to owners of Windows 10 PCs. 

    Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

    The news was buried in yet another long-winded post on the Windows Blog, which praises Windows 11 and encourages business customers to upgrade their old PCs, buy new ones, or migrate to cloud-based alternatives like Windows 365.

    Also: Can’t quit Windows 10? You can pay Microsoft for updates after October, or try these alternatives

    That announcement applies to tens of millions of consumer PCs that are ineligible for the free Windows 11 upgrade because they don’t meet compatibility requirements. Enterprise customers are ineligible for the free options and will be required to pay a significantly higher price (starting at $61 per device per year, and then doubling each year after that) for up to three years of a commercial ESU subscription. Those business options are available through the Microsoft Volume Licensing Program today; Microsoft’s Cloud Service Provider partners will be able to begin selling the commercial ESUs starting Sept. 1.

    ESU coverage for personal devices runs from October 15, 2025, through October 13, 2026. The ESU subscription is tied to a Microsoft account and can be applied to as many as 10 PCs when signed in using that account.

    Who’s eligible?

    The option to sign up for an ESU subscription from a personal Windows 10 PC is available in Windows Insider builds today, and the company says it will begin rolling out to additional Windows 10 PCs in July, with broad availability expected by mid-August.

    The option will be available to any PC running Windows 10, version 22H2, Home, Professional, Pro Education, and Workstation editions, with the latest update installed. Enterprise and Education editions are not eligible. The option will also be unavailable on any PC that is joined to an Active Directory domain, Entra ID-joined, or registered with Mobile Device Management software such as Windows Intune. (Full instructions are available in this Microsoft Support document.)

    You must be signed in with an administrator account. Because the ESU subscription is tied to a Microsoft account, you will also need to sign into a Microsoft account as part of the enrollment process.

    How to sign up 

    I was able to test the enrollment process on a PC running the Release Preview edition of Windows 10 Pro. The sign-up link is available in Settings > Windows Update, as shown next:

    enroll-in-esu-settings

    On a personal device running the latest Windows 10 version, you’ll find this link to sign up for Extended Security Updates.

    Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

    Clicking “Enroll now” opens the enrollment wizard. Because I was signed in with a Microsoft account and had previously used the Windows Backup program to save my settings to Microsoft’s cloud, I was waved right through with the following message:

    esu-eligible

    If you’re signed in with a Microsoft account and you’ve already used the Windows Backup program, you’ll be able to enroll for free, immediately.

    Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

    If you’re signed in with a local account, or if you haven’t previously run Windows Backup, you’ll need to jump through a few extra hoops. You’ll see this page in the enrollment wizard instead.

    esu-options-wizard

    The free options require a commitment using a Microsoft account. 

    Microsoft

    The easiest of the free options is to use Windows Backup to sync your settings to the cloud. If you’d rather not do that, you can redeem 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points or pay $30 (outside the US, local pricing will vary).

    Also: How to upgrade your ‘incompatible’ Windows 10 PC to Windows 11 – 2 free options

    As I’ve previously noted, this option is available only for “personal use,” a move that’s obviously designed to discourage business customers from trying to get security updates at a discount. In small businesses that aren’t part of a managed Microsoft environment, it would be impossible to enforce that restriction, so Microsoft has wisely decided to block personal ESU subscriptions only on commercial devices that are part of a managed enterprise network.

    What’s the catch with the free options?

    Using Windows Backup to “sync your settings to the cloud” sounds like a simple option, but that option might not work for you. As it currently exists, the Windows Backup option also copies personal data to the OneDrive cloud storage service. If you have a substantial amount of data and haven’t paid for a Microsoft 365 Home or Personal subscription or a standalone storage upgrade, you’ll burn through the 5GB of default storage and possibly wind up with a big mess.

    Also: Can’t upgrade your Windows 10 PC? Here are your options before it all ends in 3 months

    Redeeming 1,000 Microsoft Rewards points is a simpler option. If you’ve already created a personal profile using your Microsoft Account in Edge, you might have already amassed enough points to cover that cost (those points would be worth a little under $1 if redeemed for an Amazon gift card). If your Microsoft Rewards count is starting from zero, you can quickly cover the bill by downloading the Bing app for mobile and using it for two days (500 points), then doing a series of search-based quizzes, polls, and other silly tasks for a few days to accumulate 100-200 points per day on the Microsoft Rewards site.

    And if none of those options work for you … well, that will be $30, please.

    Also: 400 million Windows PCs vanished in 3 years. Where did they all go?

    These announcements represent a pretty big climb-down for Microsoft and a tacit acknowledgment that the population of Windows 10 PCs still in use in October is likely to be much larger than expected. The new ESU options won’t change the end-of-support date for Windows 10, but they do offer a one-year reprieve for price-sensitive consumers and a chance for Microsoft to soften the inevitable PR hit it will take at the end of 2025.

    Get the morning’s top stories in your inbox each day with our Tech Today newsletter.


    Continue Reading

  • PHC orders reserved seats reallocation

    PHC orders reserved seats reallocation

    Listen to article


    PESHAWAR:

    The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday annulled the distribution of reserved seats in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) Assembly and ordered the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to redistribute the seats after hearing the parties.

    A two-member bench, comprising Justice Syed Arshad Ali and Justice Dr Khurshid Iqbal, announced the reserved judgment on the petition of the PML-N against the distribution of reserved seats.

    In its two-page judgment, the court declared null and void both the announcements of the ECP regarding the allocation of reserved seats for women and minorities. It said the ECP should reallocate these seats after hearing all candidates and political parties within 10 days.

    The court delayed the oath-taking of the lawmakers on the reserved seats until the ECP decision. The court also ruled that ECP’s deadline for the independent candidates to join any political party in the provincial assembly by February 22, 2024, was unconstitutional.

    The K-P Assembly comprises 124 lawmakers – 99 elected on general seats, besides 21 reserved seats for women and four reserved seats for non-Muslims. The reserved seats are allocated only to the political parties in the house based on their strength.

    After the general elections on February 8, 2024 the ECP allocated the reserved seats to the political parties, excluding the independents, who were PTI-backed, and formed majority in the house. However, the matter dragged for over a year in the courts, until it was settled in the Supreme Court recently.

    The PHC ruling directed the ECP to redistribute these seats after hearing the PML-N, the JUI-F, the PPP, the ANP and the PTI-Parliamentarians.

    Earlier, during the hearing, ECP Special Secretary Law Muhammad Arshad, ECP lawyer Mohsin Kamran, PML-N lawyer Aamir Javed and Barrister Saqib Raza, JUI lawyer Naveed Akhtar and Farooq Afridi appeared in the court.

    The petitioner’s lawyer argued that the ECP counted six PML-N members – five elected on general seats and one independent joining the party within three days of stipulated time – and distributed the reserved seats, accordingly, through a notification issued on February 22, 2024.

    However, he continued, notifications of the election victories of some candidates were still pending by that time. He added that the notification of Malik Tariq Awan’s victory was issued on February 22, who joined the PML-N on February 23 – well within the three days of timeframe.

    This raised the PML-N’s strength in the house to seven, the lawyer told the court. Similarly, he added, the ECP issued a separate notification for allocation of reserved seats for minorities on March 4 and again the PML-N’s six seats were counted, as Awan was declared an independent.

    As per the distribution, lawyer stated, one minority seat was given to the JUI, one to the PML-N and one to the PPP, while one seat was left vacant, which would have been decided through tossing of the coin. He added that the party moved the ECP and claimed that it had seven seats in the house.

    Overall, lawyer Aamir Javed told the court, the ECP gave 10 reserved seats to the JUI based on its seven general seats in the assembly, while the PML-N was given eight reserved seats on the strength of seven general seats, by counting its six seats.

    The petitioner’s lawyer said that the party did not want postponement of the Senate elections which was due later this month. He requested that if the court wanted to send the matter to the ECP, then the election supervisor should be bound to decide the matter within three days.

    When asked by Justice Ali as to how the ECP could distribute the seats when the process was not complete, the ECP special secretary said that the assembly session had to be held 21 days after the election. He added that ECP allocated the seats based on the party positions on February 22, 2024.

    The JUI lawyer took the position that the party whose seats were challenged should be made a party to the case. Naveed Advocate said that JUI was not party and he was representing Gujral Singh, who was elected on a reserved seats.

    After hearing the matter, the court reserved its ruling, which was announced later in the day. The court also annulled the notification regarding Gujral Singh, dated March 26, 2024.

    Continue Reading

  • Nissan has halted production of three models for Canada at two US plants, Nikkei reports – Reuters

    1. Nissan has halted production of three models for Canada at two US plants, Nikkei reports  Reuters
    2. Nissan stops building American-made models for Canada due to tariffs  driving.ca
    3. Nissan halts US production of Canada-bound vehicles amid tariff standoff – Nikkei  Investing.com Canada
    4. Nissan not building Pathfinder, Murano or Frontier for Canada amid tariffs  Automotive News
    5. Nissan Pauses Some Vehicle Shipments to Canada Due to Trade Uncertainty  thetruthaboutcars.com

    Continue Reading

  • Vaping linked to higher COPD risk, meta-analysis finds

    Vaping linked to higher COPD risk, meta-analysis finds

    Researchers find that both current and former e-cigarette users face elevated odds of chronic lung disease, raising new questions about the long-term safety of vaping.

    Review: Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Image Credit: Vitaliy Abbasov / Shutterstock

    In a recent review published in the journal npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, a group of researchers quantified the relationship between electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and the odds of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) across observational studies.

    The majority of included studies were from the United States, with only single cohorts from China and South Korea, which may limit the generalizability of findings to other global populations.

    Background

    Every 4 seconds, someone worldwide dies from COPD, a progressive airflow-limiting illness once blamed almost exclusively on burning tobacco. Now e-cigarette devices, formally called Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), have flooded markets, promising a safer inhale but generating an aerosol rich in ultrafine particles, aldehydes, and metals.

    Public health officials face a dilemma: can vaping curb combustible smoking without seeding a new wave of COPD? Epidemiological signals are emerging, yet findings remain inconsistent and often confounded by dual use. Clarifying this relationship is vital for clinicians, policymakers, and millions of vapers; therefore, rigorous evidence is needed.

    About the study

    The investigators conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, and registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).

    The researchers systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception to 15 February 2024, pairing e-cigarette synonyms with COPD descriptors. They included observational studies of adults that categorized e-cigarette exposure as current, former, or ever use and reported relevant effect estimates, such as Odds Ratio (OR), Risk Ratio (RR), Hazard Ratio (HR), or Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR), for COPD.

    Reviewers independently screened records, extracted data through the Nested-Knowledge platform, and judged quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Random-effects meta-analysis in R version 4.4 was used to pool log-transformed effect sizes, and statistical heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic.

    Leave-one-out and predefined sensitivity analyses restricted to spirometry-confirmed diagnoses or high-quality (NOS ≥ 7) studies tested accuracy. Subgroup analyses contrasted cross-sectional with cohort designs. All risk estimates were harmonized to ORs for comparability before pooling. Potential publication bias was visually inspected using a funnel plot and formally assessed with Egger’s regression test. A two-sided P-value below the 0.05 threshold denoted significance throughout.

    Study results

    Seventeen studies meeting all inclusion criteria contributed data on over 4.3 million adults drawn mainly from the United States, with single cohorts from China and South Korea. Twelve investigations were cross-sectional, and five were longitudinal; sample sizes ranged from 8,087 to over 705,000 participants.

    While two cohorts confirmed COPD by spirometry, using the Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio, fifteen studies relied on self-reported physician diagnosis, which may introduce misclassification bias. Quality scores on the NOS ranged from 5 to 9, with most studies being ranked as moderate to high quality.

    After harmonizing estimates to ORs, the pooled analysis revealed that current e-cigarette users had 48% greater odds of COPD than never users (OR = 1.48, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.36–1.61) with no between-study heterogeneity (I² = 0%).

    Former users showed the largest relative excess: 84% higher odds (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.51–2.23), albeit with moderate inconsistency (I² = 56%). Individuals who had ever experimented with e-cigarettes, regardless of current status, still carried 79% higher odds (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.42–2.25) and again exhibited negligible heterogeneity (I² = 0%).

    Notably, all studies assessing ever-e-cigarette users in this meta-analysis adjusted for age, helping to ensure that the observed association was not simply due to age differences. Subgroup analysis suggested design-related nuance.

    Cross-sectional investigations indicated a stronger link for current e-cigarette use (OR = 1.592, 95% CI 1.349–1.879) than cohort investigations, whose summary estimate dropped to 1.145 (95% CI 0.842–1.557) and spanned unity, suggesting limited longitudinal support. Yet the design-based contrast test failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.06).

    Robustness assessments affirmed stability: removing each study in turn shifted pooled OR values by under three percentage points, and restricting the pool to high-quality articles (NOS ≥ 7) preserved significant associations for current (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.07–2.25) and former users (OR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.91–3.46).

    Conversely, limiting the analysis to the two spirometry-verified cohorts diminished the link and rendered it non-significant (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.82–1.58), highlighting that the association is less robust when only objective COPD diagnoses are used.

    Publication bias appeared unlikely; the funnel plot was symmetrical, and Egger’s regression yielded P = 0.1449. It is important to note that these findings are associations from observational studies and do not establish causality. For context, traditional cigarette smoking remains a much stronger risk factor for COPD, with prior meta-analyses reporting odds ratios of approximately 3.5 for current smokers compared to never smokers.

    Translating percentages to people, the authors did not directly calculate the proportion of COPD cases attributable to vaping; such interpretations should be made with caution.

    Conclusions

    To summarize, the aggregated evidence indicates that e-cigarette exposure is associated with greater odds of COPD, even after accounting for study quality, smoking history, and analytic approach. Current vapers face a roughly 50% increased risk, while former users retain an even larger burden.

    However, causality cannot be inferred, and the observed associations may be influenced by confounding factors, such as the dual use of combustible tobacco and a prior smoking history. Clinicians should inquire about vaping, counsel on cessation, and monitor lung function, particularly in younger adults who might otherwise be overlooked.

    Policymakers must balance any smoking-cessation benefits against the emerging respiratory toll and support longitudinal research to clarify causality. Further studies with objective COPD diagnoses, careful adjustment for smoking status, and detailed assessment of duration and intensity of e-cigarette use are needed to clarify the long-term impact of vaping on respiratory health.

    Journal reference:

    • Shabil, M., Malvi, A., Khatib, M.N. et al. (2025). Association of electronic cigarette use and risk of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Prim. Care Respir. Med. 35, 31. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-025-00438-6, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41533-025-00438-6

    Continue Reading

  • What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America? – ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

    What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America? – ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

    1. What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America?  ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
    2. Analysts say Musk’s party may be threat to Trump even without wins  Dawn
    3. America Party: Trump calls Musk’s new political party plan ‘ridiculous’  BBC
    4. Tesla stock tanks after Trump dismisses Musk’s new political party plan and calls him ‘off the rails’  CNN
    5. Elon Musk slams Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’, calls for new political party  Al Jazeera

    Continue Reading

  • China’s producer prices see worst drop in nearly two years

    China’s producer prices see worst drop in nearly two years

    Customers shop at a supermarket in Qingzhou City, East China’s Shandong Province, Aug 9, 2023.

    Costfoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    China’s producer prices plunged 3.6% in June from a year earlier, marking its largest decline in nearly two years, as a deepening price war rippled through the economy that’s already grappling with tepid consumer demand.

    The consumer price index edged 0.1% higher in June from a year ago, according to data from the National Bureau of Statistics Wednesday, returning to growth after four consecutive months of declines.

    Economists had forecast a flat reading compared to the same period a year earlier, according to a Reuters poll.

    Core CPI, stripping out food and energy prices, rose 0.7% from a year ago, the biggest increase in 14 months, according to NBS.

    The drop in producer prices, however, came worse than the expected 3.2% in a Reuters poll and marked its biggest fall since July 2023, according to LSEG data. The PPI has been mired in a multi-year deflationary streak since September 2022.

    Mainland China’s CSI 300 index rose 0.19% following the release.

    “It is too early to call the end of deflation at this stage [as] the momentum in the property sector is still weakening [and] the ‘anti-involution’ campaign is still at its early phase,” said Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management. Involution, known colloquially as “neijuan” in China, refers to the price wars plaguing some consumer sectors.

    Last week, Chinese policymakers, in a top economic policy meeting chaired by President Xi Jinping, criticized the excessive price competition by Chinese companies to entice consumers and clear excess inventory, as the U.S. tariff onslaught has threatened the viability of selling to the world’s largest consumer market.

    Beijing pledged to tighten regulations on such aggressive price-cutting that has been unable to influence consumer behavior while biting into businesses’ profitability. Profits at industrial firms plunged 9.1% in May from a year earlier, marking the steepest fall since October last year.

    “Businesses should be guided to improve product quality and support the orderly phasing out of outdated production capacity,” a Chinese state-backed newspaper said, citing the meeting.

    The rebound in consumer prices last month was helped by a consumer goods trade-in scheme, that offers subsidies for household appliances, electronics and electric vehicles, said Zichun Huang, China economist at Capital Economics.

    That boost, however, will likely diminish in the second half of this year, Huang noted, denting the underlying inflation if the oversupply issue persists.

    “With goods supply continuing to outpace demand, persistent overcapacity means price wars among manufacturers are likely to continue,” Huang added.

    “Without a strong policy stimulus, it’s hard to escape the ongoing deflationary spiral,” said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie, adding that the momentum in China’s exports in recent months has partly pared back Beijing’s desire to stimulate consumption in any meaningful way.

    “Policymakers will keep waiting until exports fall sharply,” Hu added.

    China’s export growth has shown some resilience in recent months, even as the erratic U.S. tariff policies disrupted global trade. Chinese overall exports rose 4.8% in May and 8.1% in April, thanks to a surge in shipments to the Southeast Asian nations that largely offset the shrinking U.S.-bound goods.

    Continue Reading

  • Who Was Dumped In Season 7, Episode 32?

    Who Was Dumped In Season 7, Episode 32?

    SPOILER ALERT: This post contains details about Love Island USA Season 7, Episode 32.

    Leading up to the Love Island USA Season 7 finale, America had the opportunity to impact the villa once again.

    Viewers were given the option to vote for their favorite couple, and the pair with the fewest votes would be dumped from the island.

    RELATED: Ariana Madix Makes Call To ‘Love Island USA’ Fans To Not Be “Atrocious” To Islanders On Social Media: “Don’t Do That”

    The night was tense, and when the Islanders received a text, they were asked to gather around the fire pit to discover their fate in the game.

    Chelley Bissainthe and Ace Greene were the first couple to be safe. The next couple safe from the dumping was Amaya Espinal and Bryan Arenales.

    RELATED: ‘Love Island USA’: “Cierra Has Left The Villa” After Using A Racial Slur On Resurfaced Social Media Post

    Another couple that would continue on their quest for love was Iris Kendall and Pepe García. The fourth couple safe from the dumping was Huda Mustafa and Chris Seeley.

    One last text to the Islanders revealed that viewers voted the least for Clarke Carraway and Taylor Williams, which meant that Olandria Carthen and Nic Vansteenberghe were safe.

    RELATED: ‘Love Island USA’ Narrator Iain Stirling Sets U.S. Dates For Live Stand-Up Comedy Show

    Olandria and Nic had only started to explore their connection after Nic’s genuine connection, Cierra, left the villa due to a “personal situation.”

    Viewers favored friend couple “Nicolandria” over Clarke and Taylor, who had been paired up with Olandria since the beginning. However, Casa Amor changed things for Taylor, who finally felt a deep connection with Clarke and had been inseparable since.

    RELATED: All Of Ariana Madix’s Outfits As Host Of ‘Love Island USA’ Season 7

    At the end of the episode, America has the opportunity to vote for their favorite Love Island USA Season 7 couple once again. The results of the vote will be revealed on the episode set to stream on Peacock on Thursday, June 24.

    The remaining couples after that episode will be the finalists of Love Island USA Season 7.

    Scroll through the photo gallery below to see who the couples are left on Love Island USA Season 7.

    Continue Reading

  • Brooklyn Beckham triggers more family drama ditching sister’s big day

    Brooklyn Beckham triggers more family drama ditching sister’s big day



    Brooklyn Beckham triggers more family drama as he ditches sister’s big day

    Brooklyn Beckham was recently seen enjoying a sunny holiday with his in-laws while his younger sister Harper’s birthday quietly approached back home.

    Brooklyn, 26, and Nicola, 30, jetted off to Saint-Tropez for a sunny break with her family, where they were seen shopping together and looking completely smitten.

    The couple also spent time relaxing on a yacht during the trip, joined by Nicola’s parents Nelson and Claudia, along with her brothers Will and Zach.

    Nicola Peltz gave a glimpse of the trip on Instagram, calling it her “fam fam” as she shared clips of her and Brooklyn spending time with her family.

    Brooklyn’s getaway with his in-laws came just as buzz grew about him feeling distant from his own family. For months, people have been talking about a possible rift with his parents, David and Victoria Beckham.

    Now, with Harper’s 14th birthday coming up on Thursday, some reports say he might not show up, just like he missed his dad’s 50th earlier this year. 

    A source told The Mirror that while Brooklyn still loves Harper a lot, things haven’t exactly been patched up at home.

    Continue Reading

  • What’s on Prime Video in July 2025: 10 new release movies and shows

    What’s on Prime Video in July 2025: 10 new release movies and shows

    STREAMING FRIDAY 11 JULY

    On November 13th, 2022 – in the still of the night – four University of Idaho students are brutally stabbed to death in an off-campus house in the quiet college town of Moscow, Idaho. Within the devastated families and the community at large, questions and fear abound. What happened? Who did this, and could the killer be among us? And why these four young adults? The twists and turns of what happens next – an explosion of social media sleuthing, a cross-country manhunt, a dramatic arrest, and a looming trial – have made this crime one of the most high-profile stories of the last decade, capturing the country’s attention, imagination, and paranoia like almost no other case before it.

    Told in captivating, tense, and emotionally wrenching detail by only those involved in and affected by the crime, this four-part series intimately explores this American tragedy and its continued impact and fallout.

    The series centres on the families and friends of the victims, featuring exclusive interviews with Stacey and Jim Chapin (parents of Ethan Chapin), and Karen and Scott Laramie (parents of Madison Mogan).

    One Night In Idaho: The College Murders will be available to stream here and you can view the trailer here.


    Continue Reading