Introduction
Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) during cesarean delivery can result in a series of detrimental effects on both maternal and neonatal outcomes.1,2 The prevention and management of this complication remain a major challenge in obstetric anesthesia. Among various strategies, vasopressors administration is considered the most reliable and effective approach for managing SAIH.3,4 Although phenylephrine is widely used in obstetric anesthesia, its effects on maternal heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) have raised concerns.5 Norepinephrine, a potent α-adrenergic receptor agonist with additional β-adrenergic receptor activity, mitigates bradycardia and better maintains CO, making it a promising alternative to phenylephrine.2,6
Previous studies on the prevention of SAIH during cesarean delivery have primarily focused on maternal hemodynamic parameters.7,8 In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward neonatal outcomes.9,10 Umbilical artery pH (UA-pH) is commonly used as an objective measure for assessing neonatal outcomes.10,11 However, UA-pH cannot provide a comprehensive assessment of fetal hemodynamics, particularly fetal cerebral perfusion, which critically influences cerebral oxygen supply and long-term neurodevelopment. Fetal cerebral perfusion is influenced by multiple factors, including gestational age, maternal comorbidities, fetal vascular resistance, fetal intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms, fetal cerebral protective effects. In this study, fetal cerebral perfusion was assessed by measuring the blood velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA), along with calculating the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), using standardized ultrasound measurements in healthy singleton pregnancies. These ultrasound-derived indicators are recognized as critical predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes,12,13 demonstrating high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting fetal hypoxia.14 And to clarify, the CPR offers a more comprehensive and reliable assessment of fetal well-being compared to the isolated evaluation of UA pulsation index (PI) or MCA PI. By integrating these measurements, CPR effectively eliminates common external confounding factors, minimizes measurement errors, and provides a more realistic and objective evaluation of fetal intrauterine conditions. Particularly in compromised pregnancies where fetal hypoxia is present, the study drug effects on cerebral hemodynamics may assume greater clinical significance.
The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the effects of prophylactic norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion on fetal cerebral perfusion during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, assessed non-invasively using Doppler ultrasound. Based on previous studies demonstrating norepinephrine’s superior ability to maintain maternal cardiac output,2,6 we hypothesized that norepinephrine is more effective than phenylephrine in maintaining fetal cerebral perfusion during the management of maternal SAIH.
Material and Methods
Study Design and Patient Enrollment
This randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was conducted at the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn; registration no. ChiCTR2300077137; registration date: October 31, 2023) and approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Clinical Research Ethical Review Board (IRB-20230290-R).
We enrolled singleton pregnant women aged 18–40 years scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. All participants were informed of the purpose of the study and gave their written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included: (1) failure or refusal to provide informed consent; (2) contraindications to norepinephrine or phenylephrine use; (3) allergy to ropivacaine; (4) fetal abnormalities; (5) obesity (body mass index > 35kg/m2); (6) obstetric complications, such as hypertension, preeclampsia, cardiovascular disease; (7) preterm rupture of the membranes; (8) contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia; and (9) participation in other clinical studies.
Randomization and Blinding
Before starting the study, a computer-generated random number sequence for 200 codes was created using SPSS software, version 23.0 (IBM Corp), with a block size of 4 to randomize subjects into two equal-sized groups. The random number codes were placed into the sealed, opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes by a research assistant not involved in patient management or data collection. Meanwhile, the research assistant was responsible for preparing the study drugs. Besides, all other members of the study team were blinded to the group allocation.
Anesthesia Management
Upon arrival in the operating room, the standard monitoring was applied using the Detax Ohmeda S/5 monitor, including noninvasive blood pressure (BP), pulse oximetry, and electrocardiography. The baseline BP was determined by averaging three consecutive readings taken at 1-minute intervals, with a difference of less than 10% between readings. The baseline values of the ratio of systolic to end-diastolic blood velocity (S/D), the resistance index (RI) and the PI for MCA and UA were measured by the same sonographer using the same ultrasound device and standardized measurement protocol at the bedside before anesthesia. All baseline measurements were obtained in the supine position.
The patient was placed in the left lateral position. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was initiated in the L3-4 intervertebral space using the needle-through-needle technique. The 18-gauge epidural needle was advanced into the epidural space, and then a 27-gauge spinal needle was used in the same intervertebral space through the epidural needle to penetrate the dura mater. After confirming the free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, a total of 3 mL (15 mg) hyperbaric ropivacaine (1.5 mL ropivacaine 1% +1 mL glucose 10% +0.5 mL normal saline) was injected into the subarachnoid space at a rate of 1 mL/10 s. Subsequently, an epidural catheter was inserted 3–4 cm in the epidural space. If cerebrospinal fluid outflow was absent or inadequate, epidural anesthesia was performed only, and such cases were excluded from the study. Next, the patient was returned to the supine position and given oxygen at a rate of 5 L/min via a face mask.
During the period from intrathecal injection to fetal delivery, maternal BP, SpO2 and HR were monitored once every 1 minute, and the rest of the study time were measured once every 3 minutes. Meanwhile, a rapid crystalloid co-load (10 mL/kg of lactated Ringer’s solution) was administered using gravity to achieve the maximal possible flow rate. Simultaneously with intrathecal injection, we commenced continuous intravenous infusion of the study drug via a standardized 50 mL syringe pump. The infusion rate was maintained at 0.01 mL/kg/min, corresponding to 0.08 μg/kg/min for norepinephrine or 0.5 μg/kg/min for phenylephrine.
Fetal ultrasound examination was conducted at the bedside by the sonographer at 3 and 6 minutes after intrathecal injection. Following this, an 18-gauge epidural needle core was utilized to confirm the sensory levels. The surgical procedure was initiated only after the sensory level had reached the T6 level. After delivery, UA and umbilical vein (UV) blood were collected for blood gas analysis. Additionally, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes were also recorded.
Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤ 80% of the baseline value or SBP ≤ 90 mmHg. Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 120% of the baseline value. Bradycardia was defined as HR < 50 beats/min. Adverse outcomes during the study period were actively managed. When hypotension occurred in the absence of bradycardia, intravenous injection of 1 mL of the study drug was administered. When hypertension occurred, the study drug infusion was discontinued and restarted when the SBP returned to < 120% of the baseline value. If bradycardia occurred accompanied by hypotension, a single bolus of 6 mg ephedrine was injected intravenously. If bradycardia occurred only, the study drug infusion was discontinued until the HR ≥ 50 beats/min. And if bradycardia persisted for 2 minutes without recovery, a single bolus of 0.5 mg atropine was injected intravenously.
Data Collection and Outcome Assessment
The demographic data and obstetric characteristics were collected. The primary outcomes were the blood velocity of the MCA and UA at 3 and 6 minutes after spinal anesthesia, as well as the calculated CPR. Secondary outcomes included maternal adverse outcomes, such as hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, nausea and vomiting, as well as neonatal outcomes, including blood gas analysis of neonatal UA and UV, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes and the neonatal ward admission. Additionally, the sensory block level, total volume of vasopressor given at delivery, total fluid intake before delivery and intervals from spinal drug administration to neonatal delivery were also recorded.
Statistical Analysis
Sample size was calculated using PASS 6.0 (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, UT, USA). Because of the lack of comparative studies on the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for prevention of hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia on fetal cerebral perfusion, we calculated the sample size based on the changes in maternal cardiac output in a previous study. The study demonstrated that the changes in maternal cardiac output were 102.7% and 93.8% in parturients who received norepinephrine and phenylephrine, respectively, for the prevention of hypotension.15 Based on this, we estimated that a sample size of 88 patients per group with an alpha error of 0.05 would provide 90% power. Considering a 20% dropout rate, the sample size was increased to 100 per group.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 23.0 (IBM Corp) (Supplementary Material 1). The normality test of the data was conducted first using the Shapiro–Wilk (SW) test. Nonnormally distributed data were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U-test and presented as the median (interquartile range). Normally distributed data were analyzed with Student’s t-test and presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test and presented as the number (%).
Results
The subject recruitment diagram is shown in Figure 1. We recruited a total of 216 patients, and ultimately, a total of 180 parturients completed the study and were available for final statistical analysis, with 90 parturients in norepinephrine group (Group NE) and 90 in phenylephrine group (Group PE). The subject characteristics are shown in Table 1. The demographic data and obstetric characteristics were similar among groups, indicating that the baseline characteristics of the two groups are balanced.
|
Table 1 Demographic and Obstetric Characteristics
|
 |
Figure 1 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flowchart showing patient recruitment.
|
The primary outcomes are presented in Table 2 and the CPR trends are presented in Figure 2. The baseline values of CPR, which are calculated as the ratio of MCAPI/UAPI, as well as the values of CPR at 3 and 6 minutes after spinal anesthesia are comparable between the two groups. The changes in CPR at 3 and 6 minutes after spinal anesthesia were comparable between the two groups. The estimated difference of ΔCPR in two groups was – 0.01 (95% CI, −0.05–0.02, P = 0.491) at 3 minutes and was 0.02 (95% CI, −0.01–0.07, P = 0.204) at 6 minutes. Additionally, the blood velocity of the MCA and UA were similar between the groups.
 |
Table 2 Outcome of MCA and UA Blood Flow
|
 |
Figure 2 Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) Trends Following Spinal Anesthesia. The chart illustrates changes in CPR at 0 min (baseline), 3 min and 6min after spinal anesthesia.
|
The intraoperative details are shown in Table 3. There were no significant differences in the incidences of hypotension, hypertension, nausea and vomiting between the groups. However, the incidence of maternal bradycardia in Group PE was significantly greater than that in Group NE (9 in Group PE and 2 in Group NE) (P = 0.03). Additionally, sensory block level, total volume of vasopressor given at delivery, total fluid intake before delivery and the time from subarachnoid block to fetal delivery between the two groups were comparable. And only one patient per group received 6 mg ephedrine, with no associated fetal compromise. Neonatal outcomes, including the UA and UV blood gases and Apgar scores are similar between groups (Table 4).
 |
Table 3 Intraoperative Details
|
 |
Table 4 Neonatal Outcome
|
Discussion
The findings of this study revealed no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome [blood velocity of the MCA and UA at 3 and 6 minutes after spinal anesthesia, as well as the CPR], following continuous infusion of either norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.5 μg/kg/min) for preventing SAIH during cesarean section. The secondary outcome measures related to maternal and neonatal outcomes, hemodynamic effects and vasopressor requirements also showed no significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the PE group compared to the NE group.
The current study builds upon a previous work by our group in which we found that spinal anesthesia combined with prophylactic infusion of equivalent doses of norepinephrine or phenylephrine produces comparable effects on fetal HR and CO.16 Compared to that study, this research focuses on changes in fetal cerebral perfusion. Fetal cerebral perfusion is influenced not only by maternal blood pressure but also by multiple factors, including fetal local vascular resistance, fetal self-regulation mechanisms, and fetal cerebral protective effects. Additionally, the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine crossing the placenta on the fetus are unknown.
The UA and MCA are the most commonly used vessels to understand placental resistance and determine fetal hemodynamic changes. MCA is the most abundant blood vessel in cerebral hemispheres, which directly reflects the supply of fetal intracranial blood circulation. By detecting the parameters of fetal middle cerebral artery blood flow, clinicians can identify the presence of the fetal hypoxia and fetal anemia. The CPR, calculated as the ratio of MCAPI/UAPI, is used to assess fetal intrauterine status by evaluating the balance between cerebral and placental blood flow.14 Compared to fetal HR and CO, CPR offers significant advantages by providing a comprehensive assessment of fetal hemodynamics, sensitively detecting early signs of hypoxia, dynamically evaluating placental function, and demonstrating strong correlations with adverse perinatal outcomes. Hence, CPR holds a substantial clinical value in fetal monitoring, especially in assessing intrauterine fetal status and predicting pregnancy outcomes.14,17 Of course, CPR assessment has certain limitations. Specifically, it requires simultaneous measurement of blood flow in both the MCA and UA, which can be time-consuming. However, in our study, all Doppler measurements were performed by the same experienced sonographers, ensuring both efficiency and accuracy without disrupting standard clinical workflows.
This study found no significant difference in CPR between the NE and PE groups. The most likely explanation is that the combination of prophylactic vasopressor infusion and fluid co-loading effectively prevents SAIH, thereby mitigating the range of adverse effects associated with hypotension on the fetus. It is well established that SAIH adversely affects neonatal outcomes. Both the severity of hypotension and the cumulative duration of hypotensive episodes are associated with fetal acidemia and lowered Apgar scores.2,18 Therefore, timely intervention to address the severity and duration of hypotension, rather than focusing solely on its incidence, may hold greater clinical significance. In the current study, BP was measured every minute from the initiation of spinal anesthesia until delivery, and hypotension was promptly managed upon detection with either a 6 mg ephedrine bolus or 1 mL of the study drug, depending on the presence or absence of concurrent bradycardia. As a result, no adverse neonatal outcomes were observed in either group.
We observed that the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the PE group compared to the NE group, which is consistent with findings from numerous previous studies.19,20 All cases of bradycardia were promptly managed and no serious adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were observed. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in CPR between the two groups. Although studies have demonstrated that maternal HR and CO directly influence placental blood perfusion and indirectly affect fetal hemodynamics,21 research specifically examining the direct association between maternal hemodynamics and fetal CPR remains limited. Other studies have shown that in the early stages of fetal hypoxia, the fetus maintains hemodynamic stability through its compensatory mechanism, known as the “brain-sparing effect” which may result in Doppler ultrasound parameters of the MCA and UA remaining within the normal range.22,23 In the current study, the average time from subarachnoid block to fetal delivery was only 13 to 14 minutes. Consequently, the slowdown of the maternal HR had a very limited impact on placental blood perfusion, as well as the blood flow in the MCA and the UA. This might also be a key explanation for the absence of significant differences in the CPR between the two groups. Further investigation is required to determine whether variations in delivery time (from subarachnoid block to fetal delivery) could lead to differences in CPR.
Prophylactic continuous infusion of vasopressors is currently the widely recommended strategy in clinical practice for preventing hypotension following obstetric spinal anesthesia.2,24 The initial infusion doses of norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) and phenylephrine (0.5 μg/kg/min) were selected in this study based on two prior dose-response studies which established the 90% effective dose (ED90) for preventing SAIH during cesarean delivery were 0.08 μg/kg/min and 0.54 μg/kg/min, respectively.25,26 However, these ED90 values were derived using probit regression rather than directly measuring a 10% incidence of hypotension at these doses. Therefore, the maternal and fetal effects of norepinephrine (0.08 μg/kg/min) and phenylephrine (0.54 μg/kg/min) require further verification and comparison through clinical trials. The incidence of hypotension in the NE and PE groups of this study was 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that the previously estimated ED90 values for norepinephrine and phenylephrine were relatively accurate.
Our study has several limitations. First, the inclusion criteria limited the study to healthy parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. This homogeneity in the study population may limit applicability to populations with complications, such as preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. However, CPR is an important monitoring indicator in high-risk pregnancies (such as acute fetal distress, preeclampsia, cardiovascular diseases, and fetal anomalies). Through dynamic monitoring of CPR, it facilitates the early identification of potential risks, optimization of clinical management, and reduction of perinatal complications.27,28 Secondly, although we have presented confidence intervals for the primary outcomes, which provide a clear sense of the range of plausible effects, we did not conduct a pilot study. When calculating the sample size, owing to the absence of comparative studies on the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in preventing SAIH on fetal cerebral perfusion, the estimation was based on changes in maternal CO, which may introduce some degree of bias. Thirdly, this study did not measure maternal cardiac output, making it impossible to analyze the correlation between changes in fetal cerebral perfusion and maternal CO.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the prophylactic infusion of equivalent doses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine had similar effects on fetal CPR following spinal anesthesia. Neither vasopressor caused significant adverse effects on fetal circulation or neonatal outcomes. Further research is required to evaluate the effects of spinal anesthesia combined with these vasopressors on fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by maternal comorbidities.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the staff in the Department of Anesthesia and Operating Room of the Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, for their help in this study.
Funding
This work was supported by funding from Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2024XY101 to Dr. Zhimin Sheng) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82272183 to Dr. Xiaowei Qian).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(7):636–653. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x
2. Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(1):71–92. doi:10.1111/anae.14080
3. Lirk P, Haller I, Wong CA. Management of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension for caesarean delivery: a European survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29(9):452–453. doi:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328352ab10
4. Šklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. Spinal anaesthesis-induced hypotension in obstetrics: prevention and therapy. Acta Clin Croatica. 2019;58(Suppl 1):90–95. doi:10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13
5. Ngan Kee WD, Lee SW, Ng FF, Tan PE, Khaw KS. Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(4):736–745. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000601
6. Ngan Kee WD. The use of vasopressors during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30(3):319–325. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000453
7. Hasanin A, Amin S, Refaat S, et al. Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against post-spinal anaesthesia hypotension during elective caesarean delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38(6):601–607. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2019.03.005
8. Kondo Y, Hirose N, Maeda T, Yoshino A, Suzuki T. Relationship between changes in regional cerebral blood volume and oxygenation and changes in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance during spinal anesthesia in women undergoing cesarean section. Journal of Anesthesia. 2019;33(5):579–586. doi:10.1007/s00540-019-02670-0
9. Ngan Kee WD, Lee SWY, Ng FF, Lee A. Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic non-inferiority study of neonatal outcome. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):588–595. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.057
10. Kang H, Sung TY, Jee YS, et al. A Comparison of Norepinephrine versus Phenylephrine to Prevent Hypotension after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024;14(8):803. doi:10.3390/jpm14080803
11. Liu T, Cheng Z, Zou S, et al. Effect of Weight-Adjusted Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine, and Metaraminol for Elective Cesarean Delivery on Neonatal Acid-Base Status: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:3215–3223. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S381048
12. Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):454–464. doi:10.1002/uog.20102
13. Szpera-Gozdziewicz A, Kosicka K, Gozdziewicz T, et al. Maternal Serum Endocan Concentration in Pregnancies Complicated by Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Reproductive Sci. 2019;26(3):370–376. doi:10.1177/1933719118773480
14. DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):5–15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.024
15. Belin O, Casteres C, Alouini S, Le Pape M, Dupont A, Boulain T. Manually Controlled, Continuous Infusion of Phenylephrine or Norepinephrine for Maintenance of Blood Pressure and Cardiac Output During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: a Double-Blinded Randomized Study. Anesthesia Analg. 2023;136(3):540–550. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006244
16. Sun L, Tang Y, Guo F, et al. Norepinephrine or phenylephrine for the prevention of post-spinal hypotension after caesarean section: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output. J Clin Anesthesia. 2024;97:111533. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111533
17. Ashkar Majadla N, Abu Shqara R, Frank Wolf M, Tuma R, Lowenstein L, Odeh M. The role of the cerebroplacental ratio in predicting pregnancy outcomes at 40–42 gestational weeks: a prospective observational trial. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics. 2024;310(1):113–119. doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07372-x
18. Ngan Kee WD, Lee A. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with umbilical arterial pH and standard base excess after Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(2):125–130. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02888.x
19. Kumari K, Chaudhary K, Sethi P, et al. Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesioll. 2022;88(12):1043–1056. doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16654-X
20. Singh A, Jain K, Goel N, Arora A, Kumar P. Neonatal outcomes following prophylactic administration of phenylephrine or noradrenaline in women undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022;39(3):269–276. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001634
21. Di Giosia P, Giorgini P, Ferri C. Is labor-onset hypertension a novel category among hypertensive disorders of pregnancy associated with adverse events in high-risk subjects? Lights and shadows. Hypertension Res. 2016;39(6):401–403. doi:10.1038/hr.2016.10
22. Miller SL, Huppi PS, Mallard C. The consequences of fetal growth restriction on brain structure and neurodevelopmental outcome. J Physiol. 2016;594(4):807–823. doi:10.1113/JP271402
23. Rani S, Huria A, Kaur R. Prediction of perinatal outcome in preeclampsia using middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery pulsatility and resistance indices. Hypertension Pregnancy. 2016;35(2):210–216. doi:10.3109/10641955.2015.1137585
24. Singh D, Yadav JBS, Singh AK, Rai MK. Comparing the Effect of Phenylephrine Bolus and Phenylephrine Infusion for Maintaining Arterial Blood Pressure During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: a Randomized Prospective Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42713. doi:10.7759/cureus.42713
25. Fu F, Xiao F, Chen W, et al. A randomised double-blind dose-response study of weight-adjusted infusions of norepinephrine for preventing hypotension during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e108–e114. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.019
26. Xiao F, Shen B, Xu WP, Feng Y, Ngan Kee WD, Chen XZ. Dose-Response Study of 4 Weight-Based Phenylephrine Infusion Regimens for Preventing Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia. Anesthesia Analg. 2020;130(1):187–193. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000004092
27. Mohamed ML, Mohamed S, Elshahat AMJMEFSJ. Cerebroplacental ratio for prediction of adverse intrapartum and neonatal outcomes in a term uncomplicated pregnancy. Middle East Fertility Soc J. 2021;26:45. doi:10.1186/s43043-021-00090-3
28. Graupner O, Meister M, Lecker L, et al. Role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk pregnancies at term. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics. 2023;308(3):849–855. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06733-8
