Blog

A bombardment of comets is thought to have occurred in the inner solar system as a result of a dynamical instability among the giant planets after gas disk dispersal.

Vesta, the second largest asteroid in the main asteroid belt, likely differentiated before gas disk dispersal, implying its crust witnessed the cometary bombardment. The composition of HED meteorites, which represent fragments of Vesta’s crust, could therefore have been altered by cometary impacts.

Here we combine noble gas mass spectrometry measurements, N-body simulations, collision rate calculations, and impact simulations to estimate the cometary contribution to Vesta.

While our dynamical simulations indicate that Vesta likely underwent a significant number of collisions with large comets, we find no xenon cometary signature in HED meteorites. This apparent contradiction arises due to the fact that cometary impacts were at high speeds and Vesta’s weak gravitational attraction made it incapable of retaining cometary material.

Smaller asteroids are even less likely to retain such material. Therefore, if a cometary xenon signature is ever detected in an asteroid belt object, it must have been acquired during formation, within the same source region as comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, and have been implanted later into the asteroid belt.

Sarah Joiret, Guillaume Avice, Ludovic Ferrière, Zoë M. Leinhardt, Simon Lock, Alexandre Mechineau, Sean N. Raymond

Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:2507.00753 [astro-ph.EP] (or arXiv:2507.00753v1 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.00753
Focus to learn more
Related DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ade990
Focus to learn more
Submission history
From: Sarah Joiret
[v1] Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:57:44 UTC (350 KB)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00753
Astrobiology, Astrochemistry, Astrogeology,

Sea spiders (Pycnogonida) have a very strange body shape. They’re tiny marine animals with super skinny trunks and legs so long that some of their organs stretch into them! Their belly is so reduced it’s barely visible. They belong to the same group as spiders and scorpions: chelicerates, named after their special claw-like mouthparts called chelicerae.

Because sea spiders look so different, researchers are exploring their genome to understand what genes create such unusual bodies and what this reveals about their evolutionary history.

Researchers from the University of Vienna and the University of Wisconsin- Madison have created the first chromosome-level genome of the sea spider Pycnogonum litorale. This breakthrough helps explain the species’ unusual body structure and offers new insights into the evolution of chelicerates—a group that includes spiders, scorpions, and horseshoe crabs.

To assemble the sea spider genome, researchers used two advanced sequencing techniques. First, they applied long-read sequencing to one individual, which captured long stretches of DNA and helped piece together tricky parts of the genome. Then, with a second individual, they studied how DNA is arranged inside the cell, figuring out which pieces sit close together.

Scientists revealed the oldest known scorpion on Earth

By combining these approaches, they successfully built 57 pseudochromosomes, covering nearly the whole genome with high precision. They also added data on gene activity across different developmental stages, giving an even deeper look into how this unique animal develops and functions.

The team mainly focused on the so-called Hox cluster, a gene family that is evolutionarily conserved across the animal kingdom. In arthropods like sea spiders, Hox genes are crucial for defining where different body segments go—head, thorax, abdomen, etc. But their role isn’t limited to creepy crawlies! Across many animal groups, Hox genes act as master regulators, guiding the overall layout during development.

In a fascinating twist, scientists discovered that Pycnogonum litorale, a sea spider, is missing a key Hox gene called abdominal-A (Abd-A), a gene normally responsible for shaping the rear end of arthropods. Its absence may explain why sea spiders have extremely reduced abdomens, a trait also seen in mites and barnacles.

This supports a broader evolutionary pattern: when certain Hox genes disappear, the body parts they control often shrink or vanish. Sea spiders now join the list of species showing this gene-body connection.

Unlike spiders and scorpions, which show signs of ancient whole-genome duplications, P. litorale has no such genetic echoes. Since sea spiders are considered the sister group to all other chelicerates, this suggests that genome duplications occurred later, in specific subgroups, not in the earliest chelicerate ancestors.

The newly completed genome of P. litorale gives scientists a powerful tool for comparing chelicerate species—like spiders, scorpions, and horseshoe crabs—and studying how their body plans evolved.

Identifying the genes behind venom production

Why sea spiders stand out:

• Their development may reflect how early arthropods grew.
• They have unique body features not seen in other species.
• They can regenerate parts of their body, which is rare and exciting for research.

With the genome and gene activity data now in hand, researchers like Georg Brenneis can explore these traits in detail at the molecular level.

Journal Reference:

1. Papadopoulos, N., Kulkarni, S.S., Baranyi, C., et al. The genome of a sea spider corroborates a shared Hox cluster motif in arthropods with a reduced posterior tagma. BMC Biol 23, 196 (2025). DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02276-x

Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above. ✖

Can animals share the same space peacefully high above the ground in the treetops? A research team at the University of Göttingen has found that forests combining both deciduous and conifer trees make it easier for red squirrels and dormice to coexist. Using cameras placed high in the canopy, scientists discovered that red squirrels tend to prefer coniferous forests, while dormice are more commonly found in beech forests. However, in mixed forests that include both tree types, both species were observed living side by side. This suggests that mixed forests could play an important role in supporting biodiversity. The findings were published in the European Journal of Wildlife Research.

The study took place in northern Germany and used 80 cameras placed between 2 and 30 meters above the ground in the trees.  The researchers, with the help of professional climbers, had to climb up each tree to install, inspect and retrieve the cameras in the forest canopy. Cameras automatically recorded animals, being activated by movement and heat when animals passed through their field of view. During seven months of observation in 20 different forests, the researchers recorded 468 sightings of red squirrels and 446 of dormice. Among the dormice sightings were 249 edible dormice and 197 hazel dormice. These observations allowed the team to analyze how the presence of each species was linked to the number of beech trees and the presence of other tree-dwelling mammal species.

“Our results show that dormice and red squirrels are not avoiding each other. In fact, they can live together quite well in mixed forests,” says lead author Pedro Mittelman, a PhD researcher in Wildlife Sciences at the University of Göttingen. “This is great news – it shows that forestry management systems combining tree species can benefit wildlife.” The research team highlights the value of cultivating a mixture of trees as a way to support biodiversity, even in areas managed for timber production.

This study is part of the graduate programme EnriCo (“Enrichment of European beech forests with conifers: impacts of functional traits on ecosystem functioning”) at the University of Göttingen. It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and contributes to ongoing efforts to better understand the functioning of pure and mixed forest ecosystems.

Reference: Mittelman P, Pineda M, Balkenhol N. Mixed broadleaf-conifer forests promote coexistence of red squirrels and doormice. Euro J Wildlife Res. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10344-025-01947-y

This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source. Our press release publishing policy can be accessed here.