Blog

The ITA notifies canoeist Mehdi Deghmache of an apparent anti-doping rule violation

The ITA reports that a sample collected on 21 June 2025 during the 2025 ECA Canoe Sprint and Paracanoe European Championships held in Račice, the Czech Republic from Mehdi Deghmache, a canoeist from France, has returned an AAF¹ for the prohibited substance boldenone and its metabolites.

Boldenone is prohibited under the 2025 WADA Prohibited List as S1.1 Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS). It is prohibited at all times (in- and out-of-competition) and is a non-specified substance. Boldenone is a synthetic anabolic steroid derived from testosterone that increases muscle mass and strength.

The athlete has been informed of the case and has the right to request the analysis of the B-sample.

If the B-sample analysis is requested and confirms the result of the A-sample, the case will be considered as a confirmed anti-doping rule violation. If the B-sample analysis is not requested, the case will also go ahead as a confirmed anti-doping rule violation. The athlete will have the opportunity to present his explanations for the result.

Further, in accordance with the World Anti-Doping Code and Article 7.4.1 of the ICF Anti-Doping Rules, a mandatory provisional suspension has been imposed on the athlete. The athlete has the right to challenge the provisional suspension and ask for its lifting.

Pursuant to the ICF’s delegation of its anti-doping program to the ITA, the prosecution of the case is being handled entirely by the ITA. Given that the case is underway, there will be no further comments made.

Continue Reading

August 22, 2025
The bizarre ways food messes with the medicines we take

Although pharmaceuticals usually go through decades of development and testing to ensure they are safe and effective, there are thousands of types of drugs on the market and millions of combinations of foods they could be paired with. Scientific reviews suggest food interactions can be a major threat to safe and effective oral pharmacotherapy. Experts are only now starting to track these interactions systematically, and some even hope to harness these combinations to make drugs work better than they would on their own.

“Most drugs are unaffected by food,” says Patrick Chan, professor of pharmacy practice and administration at Western University of Health Sciences in California. “In the certain cases where certain drugs are affected by food, those are the ones we need to watch out for.”

Both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency require that drugs undergo food-effect testing, with trials involving people who have either fasted or eaten a high-calorie, high-fat meal – two slices of toast with butter, two slices of fried bacon, two fried eggs, some hash-brown potatoes, and a large glass of whole milk.

But it is almost impossible for them to test everything. And human metabolism is complicated, says Jelena Milešević, a research associate at the Center of Research Excellence in Nutrition and Metabolism in Belgrade, Serbia. “It’s like a little factory and you have a lot of inputs and a lot of outputs,” she says.

Once all the chemical reactions of the body, of the food, and of the drug are meshed together, “it’s huge, and it’s very difficult to separate”, says Milešević, who has been researching how vitamin D affects drugs in the body, and vice versa.

Continue Reading

August 22, 2025
Brentford team news and injury update ahead of Premier League clash with Aston Villa

Four players who missed Brentford’s defeat to Nottingham Forest last weekend are back in training and in contention for selection ahead of the Aston Villa clash on Saturday.

Mikkel Damsgaard was absent from the 3-1 defeat at the City Ground after becoming a father last weekend, but the midfielder is in contention for the Villans’ visit to TW8.

Ethan Pinnock had a low-grade muscle injury that kept him out of the Forest game. However, he has trained fully this week, as has Yunus Emre Konak, who was unavailable due to an ankle ligament injury. Both could feature this weekend.

Another returning midfielder is Paris Maghoma, who has been unavailable since the end of last term and missed the Bees’ pre-season trip to Portugal with a hamstring injury. After completing his rehabilitation and a full week of training, he may be in Saturday’s squad.

There is also an update on the players who currently remain sidelined and won’t be available for the visit of Unai Emery’s side to Gtech Community Stadium.

Vitaly Janelt is making good progress from his heel surgery last March. The 27-year-old has trained with the first-team squad for the first time this week.

Gustavo Nunes is back on the pitch and is completing running drills with the medical and performance team after his hamstring injury sustained against Gil Vicente in pre-season.

Continue Reading

August 22, 2025
On Her 30th Birthday, Look Back at Dua Lipa’s 30 Best Fashion Moments

Calling Dua Lipa’s style evolution one of the great glow-ups of all time would be an understatement. Ever since the star, who signed her record deal back in 2014, released her acclaimed second album Future Nostalgia with its back-to-back hits (and then was cast as Mermaid Barbie in the Barbie movie), she has been at the top of her game.

In that time Dua has become a regular presence on awards show step-and-repeats, where she never fails to pique our interest in plunging Courrèges chainmail and swirling red Prada numbers. And let’s not forget her many Met Gala moments—she even co-hosted in 2023, dressed as a Chanel bride from the fall 1992 couture collection. Her recent Radical Optimism tour was also a fashion extravaganza, with Balenciaga, Valentino, and Loewe all clamoring to dress her. Beyond this, she is something of a red-carpet style icon, and a regular server of looks on the ’gram (she’s an expert at beachside photoshoots in fresh-off-the-runway pieces and customs, alike).

Whether she’s rocking a litany of bespoke Jacquemus dresses on her birthday beach vacation, captivating the paps in a sleek Celine gown at Cannes, or donning flat Margiela Tabi Mary-Janes for a casual London dinner, Dua’s wardrobe choices have the world’s undivided attention. So, in honor of her 30th birthday, Vogue spotlights 30 of Dua Lipa’s best looks.

Continue Reading

August 22, 2025
Pair of colliding galaxies may hint at the fate of the Milky Way and its closest galactic neighbor

New observations of a pair of colliding spiral galaxies hint at what might be in store for the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy if and when they collide.

The findings, described in July in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, may also help to solve a puzzle plaguing the standard model of cosmology.

The two colliding galaxies, NGC 5713 and NGC 5179, are located 88 million light-years from Earth. They are currently about 300,000 light-years apart, although that distance is shrinking constantly as they careen toward each other.

You may like

Around them are a horde of satellite galaxies. In the standard model of cosmology, such satellite galaxies are the leftover building blocks that were drawn together by a massive halo of dark matter and assembled the large galaxies long ago. According to theory, each dwarf should be orbiting its host galaxy through the dark matter halo on a random path, and together, they should create a cloud of satellites around the main galaxy, like a swarm.

Yet observations suggest that many galaxies don’t do this. Many of the Milky Way’s dwarf galaxies, for example, orbit it in the same direction along a narrow plane. Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope have shown that the dwarf galaxies of Andromeda — the closest major galaxy to the Milky Way — are also in their own co-rotating plane. The dwarf galaxies of other galaxies, such as Centaurus A — the product of a major merger between two large galaxies — also orbit in a plane.

The new observations of NGC 5713 and NGC 5719 have shown, for the first time, a cloud of dwarf satellites transitioning into a thinner orbital plane.

“We think that the satellites would likely have orbited randomly in more of a cloud than a disk prior to the massive galaxies’ approach,” Sarah Sweet, an astronomer at the University of Queensland in Australia, told Space.com. “Currently they are not so much in a plane but are certainly co-rotating, and in a flatter than isotropic distribution — more like a tube shape — around the center of mass of both galaxies.”

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

Fourteen dwarf galaxies have been confirmed in the NGC 5713/5719 system after having had their velocities measured to prove they are in orbit around their hosts. A further 18 candidates are awaiting confirmation, and there are probably many more that are too faint to have been detected. The observations indicate that the 14 confirmed dwarf galaxies are split into two subgroups associated with the two larger galaxies, but they also appear to be orbiting them in the same direction and in the same plane.

Sweet leads a survey program called Delegate, which involves researchers from Australian institutions investigating how representative the galaxies in our Local Group, particularly the Milky Way and Andromeda, are of galaxies elsewhere in the universe.

Our galaxy and Andromeda are heading toward each other. There’s still 2.5 million light-years between the two galaxies, but in 4 billion years or so, the two galaxies will come very close. A recent analysis concluded that although there’s only a 50% chance that Andromeda will collide with the Milky Way during their first pass in the next 10 billion years, gravity will eventually cause them to fall back onto each other and merge.

The Andromeda Galaxy. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

Astronomers are trying to figure out if that merger will resemble other mergers we see in the universe or if the Milky Way and Andromeda are different from other galaxies. Because NGC 5713 and NGC 5719 are farther ahead in the process of their collision, they make for a great case study.

The astronomers, led by Helmut Jerjen of the Australian National University, considered several explanations for why the orbits of the dwarf galaxies around NGC 5713 and NGC 5719 are transforming into a co-rotating, flattened plane. Their best explanation is that the two satellite systems, trailing after their host galaxies, fell onto each other along the Boötes strip, a great filament of dark matter in the cosmic web. As the two galaxies began to interact, the gravitational dynamics of the Boötes strip and the two galaxies led to the formation of a plane of satellites.

Cosmological simulations based on the standard model, which incorporates dark matter as a crucial ingredient, struggle to form galaxies with planes of satellites around them. That leaves two options: Either the models need to be updated, or the standard model of cosmology is wrong. While some researchers argue instead for an alternative theory of gravity, called modified Newtonian dynamics, to replace dark matter, others believe that the simulations are not accurate enough and require tweaking. The evidence from NGC 5713/5719 suggests that this might be the case.

However, the existence of planes of satellites around the Milky Way and Andromeda remains a puzzle, since the galaxies are still too far away from each other for a process similar to the one in NGC 5713/5719 to occur yet. There may have been other mergers in the past, however; the Hubble Space Telescope has observed signs that Andromeda experienced a significant collision and merger with another galaxy within the past few billion years. The Milky Way is more of a puzzle, though; its last large merger was between 8 billion and 11 billion years ago.

“Major mergers like this are one possible avenue for forming planes of satellites like we see around the Milky Way and Andromeda, but it is still something of a mystery because we do not see this sort of structure commonly in the best cosmological simulations,” Sweet said. “Other explanations could be that the dwarfs are formed in situ, or fall in along filaments, or a mixture of these.”

Hubble’s careful observations are gradually piecing together the motion of the dwarf galaxies around Andromeda, and it is estimated that another five years of study will enable astronomers to track back the orbits of those dwarf galaxies to see how they came to be in their current plane. And with continued observations of other galaxies, we can learn more about what makes our own galaxy tick.

Continue Reading

August 22, 2025
Evolutionary drivers of divergent collateral sensitivity responses during antibiotic therapy
Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 404, 1199–1226 (2024).

Google Scholar
Coates, A. R. M., Halls, G. & Hu, Y. Novel classes of antibiotics or more of the same? Br. J. Pharmacol. 163, 184–194 (2011).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
O’Neill, J. et al. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations (Review on Antimicrobial Resistance, 2016).
Taylor, J. et al. Estimating the Economic Costs of Antimicrobial Resistance: Model and Results (RAND, 2014).
Lázár, V. et al. Bacterial evolution of antibiotic hypersensitivity. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 700 (2013).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Imamovic, L. & Sommer, M. O. A. Use of collateral sensitivity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 204ra132 (2013).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Szybalski, W. & Bryson, V. Genetic studies on microbial cross resistance to toxic agents. I. Cross resistance of Escherichia coli to fifteen antibiotics. J. Bacteriol. 64, 489–499 (1952).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Imamovic, L. et al. Drug-driven phenotypic convergence supports rational treatment strategies of chronic infections. Cell 172, 121–134.e14 (2018).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Barbosa, C., Römhild, R., Rosenstiel, P. & Schulenburg, H. Evolutionary stability of collateral sensitivity to antibiotics in the model pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. eLife 8, e51481 (2019).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Kim, S., Lieberman, T. D. & Kishony, R. Alternating antibiotic treatments constrain evolutionary paths to multidrug resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14494–14499 (2014).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Rodriguez de Evgrafov, M., Gumpert, H., Munck, C., Thomsen, T. T. & Sommer, M. O. A. Collateral resistance and sensitivity modulate evolution of high-level resistance to drug combination treatment in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1175–1185 (2015).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Perron, G. G., Gonzalez, A. & Buckling, A. Source–sink dynamics shape the evolution of antibiotic resistance and its pleiotropic fitness cost. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2351–2356 (2007).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Roemhild, R., Barbosa, C., Beardmore, R. E., Jansen, G. & Schulenburg, H. Temporal variation in antibiotic environments slows down resistance evolution in pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evol. Appl. 8, 945–955 (2015).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Angst, D. C., Tepekule, B., Sun, L., Bogos, B. & Bonhoeffer, S. Comparing treatment strategies to reduce antibiotic resistance in an in vitro epidemiological setting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023467118 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jahn, L. J. et al. Compatibility of evolutionary responses to constituent antibiotics drive resistance evolution to drug pairs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 2057–2069 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Pena-Miller, R. et al. When the most potent combination of antibiotics selects for the greatest bacterial load: the smile–frown transition. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001540 (2013).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Hegreness, M., Shoresh, N., Damian, D., Hartl, D. & Kishony, R. Accelerated evolution of resistance in multidrug environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13977–13981 (2008).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Michel, J.-B., Yeh, P. J., Chait, R., Moellering, R. C. & Kishony, R. Drug interactions modulate the potential for evolution of resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14918–14923 (2008).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Torella, J. P., Chait, R. & Kishony, R. Optimal drug synergy in antimicrobial treatments. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000796 (2010).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Bognár, B., Spohn, R. & Lázár, V. Drug combinations targeting antibiotic resistance. NPJ Antimicrob. Resist. 2, 29 (2024).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Roemhild, R. & Schulenburg, H. Evolutionary ecology meets the antibiotic crisis: can we control pathogen adaptation through sequential therapy? Evol. Med. Public Health 2019, 37–45 (2019).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Zhou, D.-H. & Zhang, Q.-G. Fast drug rotation reduces bacterial resistance evolution in a microcosm experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 36, 641–649 (2023).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Batra, A. et al. High potency of sequential therapy with only β-lactam antibiotics. eLife 10, e68876 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
van Duijn, P. J. et al. The effects of antibiotic cycling and mixing on antibiotic resistance in intensive care units: a cluster-randomised crossover trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 401–409 (2018).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Munck, C., Gumpert, H. K., Wallin, A. I. N., Wang, H. H. & Sommer, M. O. A. Prediction of resistance development against drug combinations by collateral responses to component drugs. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, ra156 (2014).

Google Scholar
Barbosa, C., Beardmore, R., Schulenburg, H. & Jansen, G. Antibiotic combination efficacy (ACE) networks for a Pseudomonas aeruginosa model. PLoS Biol. 16, e2004356 (2018).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Gonzales, P. R. et al. Synergistic, collaterally sensitive β-lactam combinations suppress resistance in MRSA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 855–861 (2015).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Yoshida, M. et al. Time-programmable drug dosing allows the manipulation, suppression and reversal of antibiotic drug resistance in vitro. Nat. Commun. 8, 15589 (2017).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Lozano-Huntelman, N. A. et al. Evolution of antibiotic cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in Staphylococcus epidermidis using the mutant prevention concentration and the mutant selection window. Evol. Appl. 13, 808–823 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Podnecky, N. L. et al. Conserved collateral antibiotic susceptibility networks in diverse clinical strains of Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 9, 3673 (2018).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Aulin, L. B. S., Liakopoulos, A., van der Graaf, P. H., Rozen, D. E. & van Hasselt, J. G. C. Design principles of collateral sensitivity-based dosing strategies. Nat. Commun. 12, 5691 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Yen, P. & Papin, J. A. History of antibiotic adaptation influences microbial evolutionary dynamics during subsequent treatment. PLoS Biol. 15, e2001586 (2017).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Santos-Lopez, A. et al. The roles of history, chance, and natural selection in the evolution of antibiotic resistance. eLife 10, e70676 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Beckley, A. M. & Wright, E. S. Identification of antibiotic pairs that evade concurrent resistance via a retrospective analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility test results. Lancet Microbe 2, e545–e554 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Lázár, V. et al. Genome-wide analysis captures the determinants of the antibiotic cross-resistance interaction network. Nat. Commun. 5, 4352 (2014).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Barbosa, C. et al. Alternative evolutionary paths to bacterial antibiotic resistance cause distinct collateral effects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2229–2244 (2017).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Sakenova, N. et al. Systematic mapping of antibiotic cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity with chemical genetics. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 202–216 (2025).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Roemhild, R. & Andersson, D. I. Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of collateral sensitivity to antibiotics. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009172 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Oz, T. et al. Strength of selection pressure is an important parameter contributing to the complexity of antibiotic resistance evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2387–2401 (2014).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Nichol, D. et al. Antibiotic collateral sensitivity is contingent on the repeatability of evolution. Nat. Commun. 10, 334 (2019).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Liakopoulos, A. et al. Allele-specific collateral and fitness effects determine the dynamics of fluoroquinolone resistance evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121768119 (2022).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ardell, S. M. & Kryazhimskiy, S. The population genetics of collateral resistance and sensitivity. eLife 10, e73250 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Maltas, J. & Wood, K. B. Pervasive and diverse collateral sensitivity profiles inform optimal strategies to limit antibiotic resistance. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000515 (2019).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Apjok, G. et al. Limited evolutionary conservation of the phenotypic effects of antibiotic resistance mutations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1601–1611 (2019).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Hernando-Amado, S., Sanz-García, F. & Martínez, J. L. Antibiotic resistance evolution is contingent on the quorum-sensing response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 2238–2251 (2019).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Lukačišinová, M., Fernando, B. & Bollenbach, T. Highly parallel lab evolution reveals that epistasis can curb the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 11, 3105 (2020).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Melnyk, A. H., Wong, A. & Kassen, R. The fitness costs of antibiotic resistance mutations. Evol. Appl. 8, 273–283 (2015).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Hernando-Amado, S., Sanz-García, F. & Martínez, J. L. Rapid and robust evolution of collateral sensitivity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic-resistant mutants. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba5493 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Hernando-Amado, S., Laborda, P., Valverde, J. R. & Martínez, J. L. Mutational background influences P. aeruginosa ciprofloxacin resistance evolution but preserves collateral sensitivity robustness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2109370119 (2022).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Allen, R. C., Pfrunder-Cardozo, K. R. & Hall, A. R. Collateral sensitivity interactions between antibiotics depend on local abiotic conditions. mSystems 6, e0105521 (2021).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Santos-Lopez, A., Marshall, C. W., Scribner, M. R., Snyder, D. J. & Cooper, V. S. Evolutionary pathways to antibiotic resistance are dependent upon environmental structure and bacterial lifestyle. eLife 8, e47612 (2019).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Brepoels, P. et al. Antibiotic cycling affects resistance evolution independently of collateral sensitivity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac257 (2022).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Card, K. J., LaBar, T., Gomez, J. B. & Lenski, R. E. Historical contingency in the evolution of antibiotic resistance after decades of relaxed selection. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000397 (2019).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Knöppel, A., Näsvall, J. & Andersson, D. I. Evolution of antibiotic resistance without antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e01495–17 (2017).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Card, K. J., Thomas, M. D., Graves, J. L., Barrick, J. E. & Lenski, R. E. Genomic evolution of antibiotic resistance is contingent on genetic background following a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2016886118 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Vogwill, T., Kojadinovic, M. & MacLean, R. C. Epistasis between antibiotic resistance mutations and genetic background shape the fitness effect of resistance across species of Pseudomonas. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160151 (2016).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Porse, A., Jahn, L. J., Ellabaan, M. M. H. & Sommer, M. O. A. Dominant resistance and negative epistasis can limit the co-selection of de novo resistance mutations and antibiotic resistance genes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1199 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Trindade, S. et al. Positive epistasis drives the acquisition of multidrug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000578 (2009).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jochumsen, N. et al. The evolution of antimicrobial peptide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is shaped by strong epistatic interactions. Nat. Commun. 7, 13002 (2016).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Gifford, D. et al. Identifying and exploiting genes that potentiate the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1033–1039 (2018).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Weinreich, D. M., Delaney, N. F., Depristo, M. A. & Hartl, D. L. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312, 111–114 (2006).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Zwep, L. B. et al. Identification of antibiotic collateral sensitivity and resistance interactions in population surveillance data. JAC Antimicrob. Resist. 3, dlab175 (2021).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jansen, G. et al. Association between clinical antibiotic resistance and susceptibility of Pseudomonas in the cystic fibrosis lung. Evol. Med. Public Health 2016, 182–194 (2016).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Vanderwoude, J., Azimi, S., Read, T. D. & Diggle, S. P. The role of hypermutation and collateral sensitivity in antimicrobial resistance diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations in cystic fibrosis lung infection. mBio 15, e0310923 (2024).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Lagator, M., Uecker, H. & Neve, P. Adaptation at different points along antibiotic concentration gradients. Biol. Lett. 17, 20200913 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Wistrand-Yuen, E. et al. Evolution of high-level resistance during low-level antibiotic exposure. Nat. Commun. 9, 1599 (2018).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Sanz-García, F., Sánchez, M. B., Hernando-Amado, S. & Martínez, J. L. Evolutionary landscapes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa towards ribosome-targeting antibiotic resistance depend on selection strength. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 55, 105965 (2020).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Hermsen, R., Deris, J. B. & Hwa, T. On the rapidity of antibiotic resistance evolution facilitated by a concentration gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10775–10780 (2012).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Tseng, B. S. et al. The extracellular matrix protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 2865–2878 (2013).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jahn, L. J., Munck, C., Ellabaan, M. M. H. & Sommer, M. O. A. Adaptive laboratory evolution of antibiotic resistance using different selection regimes lead to similar phenotypes and genotypes. Front. Microbiol. 8, 816 (2017).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Lindsey, H. A., Gallie, J., Taylor, S. & Kerr, B. Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change. Nature 494, 463–467 (2013).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Cisneros-Mayoral, S., Graña-Miraglia, L., Pérez-Morales, D., Peña-Miller, R. & Fuentes-Hernández, A. Evolutionary history and strength of selection determine the rate of antibiotic resistance adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac185 (2022).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Maltas, J., Huynh, A. & Wood, K. B. Dynamic collateral sensitivity profiles highlight opportunities and challenges for optimizing antibiotic treatments. PLoS Biol. 23, e3002970 (2025).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Laborda, P., Martínez, J. L. & Hernando-Amado, S. Evolution of habitat-dependent antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0024722 (2022).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Delhaye, A., Collet, J.-F. & Laloux, G. Fine-tuning of the Cpx envelope stress response is required for cell wall homeostasis in Escherichia coli. mBio 7, e00047-16 (2016).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Flemming, H.-C. & Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 247–260 (2019).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Steenackers, H., Hermans, K., Vanderleyden, J. & De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. Salmonella biofilms: an overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Res. Int. 45, 502–531 (2012).

CAS

Google Scholar
Steenackers, H. P., Parijs, I., Foster, K. R. & Vanderleyden, J. Experimental evolution in biofilm populations. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 40, 373–397 (2016).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Crabbé, A., Jensen, P. Ø., Bjarnsholt, T. & Coenye, T. Antimicrobial tolerance and metabolic adaptations in microbial biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 27, 850–863 (2019).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Trampari, E. et al. Exposure of Salmonella biofilms to antibiotic concentrations rapidly selects resistance with collateral tradeoffs. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 3 (2021).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. N., Porse, A., Sommer, M. O. A., Høiby, N. & Ciofu, O. Evolution of antibiotic resistance in biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations exposed to subinhibitory levels of ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e00320–18 (2018).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. N. et al. The evolutionary trajectories of P. aeruginosa in biofilm and planktonic growth modes exposed to ciprofloxacin: beyond selection of antibiotic resistance. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 6, 28 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Scribner, M. R., Santos-Lopez, A., Marshall, C. W., Deitrick, C. & Cooper, V. S. Parallel evolution of tobramycin resistance across species and environments. mBio 11, e00932-20 (2020).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Anderson, A., Kinahan, M. W., Gonzalez, A. H., Udekwu, K. & Hernandez-Vargas, E. A. Invariant set theory for predicting potential failure of antibiotic cycling. Infect. Dis. Model. 10, 897–908 (2025).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Nyhoegen, C. & Uecker, H. Sequential antibiotic therapy in the laboratory and in the patient. J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220793 (2023).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Udekwu, K. I. & Weiss, H. Pharmacodynamic considerations of collateral sensitivity in design of antibiotic treatment regimen. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 12, 2249–2257 (2018).

CAS

Google Scholar
Nichol, D. et al. Steering evolution with sequential therapy to prevent the emergence of bacterial antibiotic resistance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004493 (2015).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jiao, Y. J., Baym, M., Veres, A. & Kishony, R. Population diversity jeopardizes the efficacy of antibiotic cycling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/082107 (2016).
Laborda, P., Martínez, J. L. & Hernando‐Amado, S. Convergent phenotypic evolution towards fosfomycin collateral sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic‐resistant mutants. Microb. Biotechnol. 15, 613–629 (2021).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Hernando-Amado, S. et al. Rapid phenotypic convergence towards collateral sensitivity in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa presenting different genomic backgrounds. Microbiol. Spectr. 0, e02276–22 (2022).

Google Scholar
Hernando-Amado, S., Laborda, P. & Martínez, J. L. Tackling antibiotic resistance by inducing transient and robust collateral sensitivity. Nat. Commun. 14, 1723 (2023).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Merker, M. et al. Evolutionary approaches to combat antibiotic resistance: opportunities and challenges for precision medicine. Front. Immunol. 11, 1938 (2020).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Koch, G. et al. Evolution of resistance to a last-resort antibiotic in Staphylococcus aureus via bacterial competition. Cell 158, 1060–1071 (2014).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Svet, L. et al. Competitive interactions facilitate resistance development against antimicrobials. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 89, e0115523 (2023).

PubMed

Google Scholar
De Wit, G., Svet, L., Lories, B. & Steenackers, H. P. Microbial interspecies interactions and their impact on the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 76, 179–192 (2022).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Schenk, M. F. et al. Population size mediates the contribution of high-rate and large-benefit mutations to parallel evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 439–447 (2022).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Lázár, V. et al. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria show widespread collateral sensitivity to antimicrobial peptides. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 718–731 (2018).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Goedseels, M. & Michiels, C. W. Cell envelope modifications generating resistance to hop beta acids and collateral sensitivity to cationic antimicrobials in Listeria monocytogenes. Microorganisms 11, 2024 (2023).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Dawan, J., Liao, X., Ding, T. & Ahn, J. Phenotypic and genotypic responses of foodborne pathogens to sublethal concentrations of lactic acid and sodium chloride. Microb. Drug Resist. 30, 332–340 (2024).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Maltas, J., Krasnick, B. & Wood, K. B. Using selection by nonantibiotic stressors to sensitize bacteria to antibiotics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1394–1406 (2020).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Acton, L. et al. Collateral sensitivity increases the efficacy of a rationally designed bacteriophage combination to control Salmonella enterica. J. Virol. 98, e0147623 (2024).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Hasan, M., Dawan, J. & Ahn, J. Assessment of the potential of phage–antibiotic synergy to induce collateral sensitivity in Salmonella Typhimurium. Microb. Pathog. 180, 106134 (2023).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Qin, K. et al. Phage–antibiotic synergy suppresses resistance emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae by altering the evolutionary fitness. mBio 15, e0139324 (2024).

PubMed

Google Scholar
Mu, Y. et al. Leveraging collateral sensitivity to counteract the evolution of bacteriophage resistance in bacteria. mLife 4, 143–154 (2025).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Carolus, H. et al. Collateral sensitivity counteracts the evolution of antifungal drug resistance in Candida auris. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 2954–2969 (2024).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Pluchino, K. M., Hall, M. D., Goldsborough, A. S., Callaghan, R. & Gottesman, M. M. Collateral sensitivity as a strategy against cancer multidrug resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 15, 98–105 (2012).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Danisik, N., Yilmaz, K. C. & Acar, A. Identification of collateral sensitivity and evolutionary landscape of chemotherapy-induced drug resistance using cellular barcoding technology. Front. Pharmacol. 14, 1178489 (2023).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Zhao, B. et al. Exploiting temporal collateral sensitivity in tumor clonal evolution. Cell 165, 234–246 (2016).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Mandt, R. E. K. et al. Diverse evolutionary pathways challenge the use of collateral sensitivity as a strategy to suppress resistance. eLife 12, e85023 (2023).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Hsu, H.-C. et al. Structures revealing mechanisms of resistance and collateral sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to proteasome inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 14, 8302 (2023).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ross, L. S. et al. Identification of collateral sensitivity to dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitors in Plasmodium falciparum. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 508–515 (2018).

CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Linkevicius, M., Anderssen, J. M., Sandegren, L. & Andersson, D. I. Fitness of Escherichia coli mutants with reduced susceptibility to tigecycline. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 71, 1307–1313 (2016).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Nicoloff, H. & Andersson, D. I. Lon protease inactivation, or translocation of the lon gene, potentiate bacterial evolution to antibiotic resistance. Mol. Microbiol. 90, 1233–1248 (2013).

CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Roemhild, R., Linkevicius, M. & Andersson, D. I. Molecular mechanisms of collateral sensitivity to the antibiotic nitrofurantoin. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000612 (2020).

PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar

Continue Reading

The aims of this study were (1) understanding the contextual factors influencing health outcomes in heat-exposed outdoor workers, (2) identifying key mechanisms and linking these factors with (3) wearable device-based intervention outcomes. Based on these results, we aimed to propose an explanatory intervention model for wearable usage in heat-exposed outdoor workers. A scoping review was conducted to identify relevant studies on heat-exposed outdoor workers. Of the 410 studies initially screened, 19 studies were selected for an in-depth review. The different studies showed a diverse overview of wearable device-based interventions for heat-exposed outdoor workers with different methodological approaches, including all aspects of context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Contextual factors

Several contextual factors emerged from the scoping review that contribute to the health risks of heat-exposed outdoor workers. Most studies primarily focused on male workers from labor-intensive industries like construction, agriculture, and groundwork. These outdoor workers often face compounded risks due to obesity, pre-existing health conditions, and a lack of sufficient health and safety measures on the job [37, 49]. These factors exacerbate the health risks associated with heat exposure [65]. The physiological strain imposed by working in high temperatures can lead to conditions such as heat stress, dehydration, heat exhaustion, and even heat stroke [66]. The most significant contributors to heat-related health issues are extreme temperatures in the work environments, combined with long working hours and strenuous physical tasks [12]. Outdoor workers, for example, farmworkers, often have limited access to cooling systems, shaded areas, and adequate hydration, exacerbating their vulnerability to heat illnesses [16, 50]. In addition to the inherent dangers of these environments, the limited access to health resources and the physical preconditions of the outdoor workers make it critical to explore effective intervention strategies emphasizing the need for tailored interventions in these vulnerable populations.

Pre-existing health conditions like obesity were highlighted as critical factors that make certain workers more prone to heat-related illnesses [37]. Thus, these individuals will benefit even more from wearable device-based interventions [49]. Regarding a previously reported high prevalence of obesity among construction workers (28%) in the USA [67,68,69] and overweight or obese farmworkers (81% of male workers and 76% of female workers) [70], this appears to be of particular relevance.

All the studies included were published in or after 2015. On the one hand, the introduction of wearable technology started around this time, for example, with personal activity trackers and the first Apple Watch in 2014 [71]. On the other hand, there was a growing interest in the effects of rising global temperatures, extreme weather, and climate change on worker health [72, 73]. Regarding regional differences, more than half of the studies were conducted in the USA. Almost one-third of the citizens in the USA used a wearable device in 2020 [74]. This underlines the higher establishment and distribution of wearables in high-income countries [75]. Furthermore, the adoption of health-monitoring technologies, such as wearable devices to measure heart rate and core body temperature, has been suggested to monitor worker health in real time. Nevertheless, the assessment of different intertwined biometrics is complex, and the devices were unreliable and less functional initially [76]. In a recent scoping review, the reliability and validity of wearables to monitor heat stress and strain were synthesized [38]. The authors reported an overestimation of temperature due to direct sunlight, overheating of the systems, and an all-beats detection failure or data loss due to movement, pressure, or not wearing the device tight enough [38, 77]. Wearables have become better at recording data over time. Nevertheless, direct validation or reliability testing of the devices in the outdoor work context is scarce [38]. Furthermore, considering contextual factors and mechanisms is becoming even more important in capturing usage and monitoring under certain circumstances. In accordance with the results of this scoping review, practical concerns such as the cost of these technologies, worker acceptance and compliance, and employer support were identified as barriers to widespread implementation [78,79,80].

Mechanisms

Worker involvement and awareness of environmental hazards were substantiated as underlying mechanisms of wearable device-based interventions. Workers should be actively involved in such programs, and their opinions and ideas should be collected, listened to, and implemented [81]. The high usefulness of monitored results was identified by surveys and interviews on workers’ feedback, needs, and perceptions of wearable technology [36, 55].

Moreover, the connection between hazard awareness and environmental health literacy was identified. Environmental health literacy, which refers to an individual’s ability to understand, evaluate, and use environmental health information to reduce risk and improve both personal and environmental health [82], is essential in creating safer work environments. The use of wearable sensors to report individually collected data, such as heat exposure and heart rate, has shown promise in improving environmental health literacy among outdoor workers. For instance, when ground maintenance workers were equipped with wearable devices, the graphically visualized temperature and heart rate data helped 94% of participants better understand the health risks associated with heat exposure [82]. To ensure the effectiveness of interventions, occupational health professionals must develop tailored strategies that address the unique challenges faced by workers with low environmental health literacy, language barriers, or inadequate safety measures [49] and consider the complexities of their work environments, such as varying climate conditions and the physical demands of labor [83].

Feedback to users and the determination of indicators of heat-related illness, including physiological measurements like heart rate and core body temperature, were identified as two additional key mechanisms for effective interventions. Feedback to users (e.g., real-time report-back visualizations) appeared to be a powerful mechanism to improve environmental health literacy and promote wearable device-based environmental monitoring [82]. Moreover, the value of a health parameter report-back, together with comparative benchmarks and an interpretative context, has been reported for a public health setting and described as helpful in raising environmental health literacy on environmental exposures [84, 85].

Outcomes

Three outcomes of wearable device-based interventions in outdoor workers could be identified: Healthy workplaces, action and adoption of health-promoting behavior, and technology use. The reviewed studies examined physiological outcomes such as core body temperature and heart rate in response to heat exposure. In a few studies, combined monitoring was performed using a multi-parameter monitoring wearable sensor measuring heart rate, breathing rate, skin temperature, and activity level [49]. Due to the correlation between heart rate and activity level, a combined evaluation is advisable. However, when using multi-parameter monitoring, it is important to consider how many parameters are recorded and ultimately reported back to the workers. An information overload can lead to excessive demands in already complex work situations [86]. However, these multi-component measurements reflect a holistic picture of the heat-exposed situation, which is currently poorly developed or lacking in the workplace [87].

Regarding technology use, data privacy is a consideration when deploying wearable sensors to monitor health outcomes. As these devices collect sensitive health information, there are risks related to unauthorized access and misuse of personal data. Ensuring that data is collected, stored, and processed in compliance with data privacy laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation is essential. Organizations must implement robust data protection measures and maintain transparency with users about how their data will be used and shared [88].

Despite the concerns regarding data privacy, there has been positive feedback regarding using multi-parameter monitoring wearable sensors. Users often report increased awareness of their physiological states, which can lead to better self-regulation and proactive measures to mitigate heat-related risks. For example, knowing their heart rate and body temperature can prompt users to take breaks, hydrate, or seek cooler environments, ultimately enhancing their safety and well-being [50, 60]. Several studies indicate that when users feel empowered by technology to manage their health, their overall satisfaction and engagement with the devices increase [89,90,91]. This feedback loop can foster a workplace culture of health and safety, encouraging employees to utilize these tools actively.

Developing the explanatory intervention model

Pre-existing and well-established models, frameworks, or theories were selected and discussed in an iterative process to design an explanatory intervention model [40, 92]. To address the mentioned context-mechanism-outcome configurations [40] of the research questions, the following three models were selected for the present study to cover (1) policy and practices for improving workplace health to capture the contextual factors (2), health promotion and natural hazards preparedness to address the mechanisms and outcomes in using wearables, and (3) technology acceptance and usage behavior to capture both contextual factors and the outcomes of wearables in heat-exposed outdoor workers:

1)

The WHO Healthy Workplace Model [81],
2)

The Precaution Adoption Process Model [93, 94],
3)

The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [95].

In the following, these three models or theories are briefly explained to give a more detailed insight.

The WHO healthy workplace model

The WHO Healthy Workplace Model was developed to provide a holistic and flexible framework for creating healthy workplace programs in various countries, workplaces, and cultures [81]. The WHO Healthy Workplace Model is comprised of four large “avenues of influence” (i.e., the content of issues), contains a process of continuous improvement, and is guided by the two core principles of leadership and worker involvement [81]. The four “avenues of influence” have been designated: (1) physical work environment, (2) psychosocial work environment, (3) personal health resources, and (4) enterprise involvement in the community [81]. They represent specific areas employers and workers can influence to create a workplace that protects and promotes all workers’ health, safety, and well-being [81]. In the present scoping review, the first three “avenues of influence” were considered particularly relevant as plausible contextual factors and mechanisms for the explanatory intervention model:

1)

The physical work environment includes factors that may affect workers’ physical safety, (mental) health, and well-being, for example, physical hazards such as excessive heat. Means and ways to positively influence the physical work environment include, for instance, personal protective equipment, such as safety boots for construction workers, and training workers on safety procedures [81].
2)

The psychosocial work environment refers to organizational culture, attitudes, values, or daily practices that can affect workers’ mental and physical well-being. Workers may experience psychosocial hazards as mental stressors, for example, problems with work demands and time pressures [81]. Ways to influence these psychosocial hazards could be the reduction of workload by reallocation of work or flexibility in the timing or location of work [81].
3)

Personal health resources in the workplace are health services, information, or resources that aim to promote workers’ physical and mental health. Employers may enhance these personal health resources, for example, by providing medical services, including health assessments or medical surveillance [81]. Worker involvement deserves special attention due to its dependence on individual acceptance of and participation in effective, healthy workplace programs [81]. In the process of selecting and implementing wearable technology, worker involvement is likely to promote a positive user experience [96] and appears critical to the successful implementation of the new technology [97].

The precaution adoption process model

The Precaution Adoption Process Model [93, 94] is a health behavior model and well-established health promotion theory [98] and explains how individuals come to take action to prevent illness, injuries, or harm caused by external hazards and health threats [94, 98]. In this model, the process of adopting a new precaution or health-promotion behavior involves seven stages in which an individual may be: (1) unaware of potential health risks (2), unengaged (3), undecided about acting (4), decide not to act (5), decide to act by adopting a new precaution or behavior (6), act (7), maintain the protective behavior over time to mitigate health risks [94, 98]. The Precaution Adoption Process Model has previously been used to characterize technology adoption and describe behavioral responses to protective technologies in mine workers [98]. In that study, the Precaution Adoption Process Model has proven suitable for identifying barriers to technology acceptance and adopting protective behavior [98]. Therefore, the Precaution Adoption Process Model contributes important aspects of technology adoption to the explanatory intervention model of the present scoping review. In this context, unawareness (stage 1) of a health risk or necessary precaution behavior refers to heat stress and respective preventive measures. The transition from stage 1 “unaware” to one of the “decision-making” stages 2 to 7 may be supported by media messages specifically tailored towards hazards and precaution measures, but also by communication with significant others or personal experience of hazards [94]. In the context of wearable device-based interventions, stage 5) “decide to act” refers to the intention to use wearables as a preventive strategy against hazardous heat effects, while stage 6) “act” involves the actual use of wearables to support and guide preventive behaviors. If such behavior were repeated customarily, stage 7) “maintenance” would be achieved [94]. Outcomes of an intervention program depend on the various individual stages of program participants and may, therefore, vary accordingly regarding knowledge, skills, engagement, and readiness for healthy behavior [99, 100].

The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology [95] integrates elements from eight popular user acceptance models. It addresses the acceptance of technology as a precondition for the use of technology and thus serves as a well-established theory to explain and predict technology use [95]. In the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, the behavioral intention to use new technology, i.e., wearable technology, is determined by the following preconditions: (1) performance expectancy, (2) effort expectancy, and (3) social influence. These preconditions for technology use determine both user acceptance and usage behavior of technology. Furthermore, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology also incorporates age, gender, experience, and voluntariness of use as four moderating variables that affect the influence of the direct determinants of technology use behavior [95]. In the original study by Venkatesh et al. [95], a diverse population across various sectors, including healthcare, education, and business environments, was involved. This broad demographic allowed for a comprehensive analysis of how user characteristics interact with the model’s constructs, providing insights applicable to a wide range of technology adoption scenarios [95]. For instance, younger users may have different expectations regarding technology performance than older users, while gender may influence perceptions of the effort required to use technology effectively [95].

The explanatory intervention model

Fig. 2

Explanatory intervention model (own illustration)

The explanatory intervention model (see Fig. 2) was developed based on the context-mechanism-outcome configurations identified in the scoping review. The included studies varied in their contribution to the context-mechanism-outcome configurations. Some offered rich contextual detail and plausible causal mechanisms (e.g., feedback systems, worker awareness), while others provided more limited or indirect insights. We considered this variation in the development of our intervention model and highlighted where assumptions were grounded in stronger theoretical contributions.

Contextual factors such as user characteristics, work environments, or preconditions of technology use were directly mapped to corresponding components in the model. Key mechanisms – like worker involvement or real-time feedback – emerged across the studies and were incorporated as central elements driving behavioral change and technology adoption. The model’s outcomes – behavioral adaptation, effective technology use, and healthy workplaces – reflect the aggregated findings of the reviewed interventions. Thus, the model synthesizes empirical insights from the literature into a structured framework for planning, implementing, and evaluating wearable device-based interventions for heat-exposed outdoor workers. Furthermore,

the various components extracted from the three mentioned models or theories enhanced the explanatory intervention model. Regarding contextual factors, (1) the aspects of user characteristics (e.g., age, gender, experience, and voluntariness of use), and (2) the preconditions of technology use (e.g., the size, weight, and robustness of sensor-based technology applications, the time investment and perceptibility of real-time feedback, and company commitment and regulations) were taken from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Additionally, the “avenues of influence” [81] were considered particularly relevant as plausible contextual factors for the explanatory intervention model to examine the effectiveness of wearable device-based interventions in outdoor workers, therefore, (3) the physical and psychosocial work environments and (4) personal health resources were found as results in the present scoping review and taken as influencing factors from the WHO Healthy Workplace Model. Most studies addressed specific work environments (e.g., construction, agriculture, and groundwork) as an essential influence on effective wearable device-based interventions. They added the psychosocial climate of safety while using a wearable and reporting symptoms of heat-related illnesses. This is accompanied by the health resources and conditions at work, such as the availability of shade and drinking water in the fields [49].

To address key mechanisms, the following aspects were included: (1) the determination of indicators for heat-related illness, (2) feedback to users, (3) worker involvement (from the WHO Healthy Workplace Model), and (4) environmental health literacy with its component awareness of environmental hazards (from the Precaution Adoption Process Model). The definitions of indicators and the heat-related illness risk measured by temperature and heart rate are important mechanisms in monitoring and reporting reliable and valid parameters. These parameters are linked with user feedback (e.g., report-back packets of heart rate and temperature). Most workers perceived the report-back of monitored temperatures and heart rates as very useful and thus were willing to change their protective behavior [91]. Therefore, worker awareness of environmental hazards and environmental health literacy are combined in the explanatory model. Together with worker involvement (e.g., perceptions and attitudes toward using digital technology), they can be a protective mechanism in developing heat strain at work [37].

Finally, the following outcomes were added: (1) the action and adoption of health-promoting behavior (from the Precaution Adoption Process Model), (2) technology use (from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology), and (3) healthy workplaces (from the WHO Healthy Workplace Model). Adopting health-promoting behaviors captures workers’ transition from awareness to actively implementing protective measures, such as staying hydrated or seeking shade. Technology use focuses on factors like ease of use, perceived usefulness, and trust in wearables, which are critical for ensuring consistent and effective device adoption. Together, these behaviors and technologies contribute to creating healthy workplaces where organizational culture and worker engagement foster sustained improvements in safety and well-being.

The spatial proximity of the factors in the model reflects their proximity in terms of content. In addition, the respective factors that are more likely to be related can be recognized on a horizontal visual axis. Exemplarily, physical, organizational, and social contextual factors include user characteristics and work environments under which outdoor workers operate. Indicators for heat-related illness serve as measurable mechanisms to identify when workers with specific user characteristics in a specific work environment are at risk of heat-related illness or when preventative actions should be triggered. For example, in a conducive work environment (e.g., a farming site or groundwork setting that offers shaded rest areas, portable cooling systems, or supportive policies like flexible work hours), workers with specific user characteristics (e.g., physical fitness levels, medical conditions such as heat sensitivity, or occupational roles like field laborers or machinery operators) wear advanced sensors that monitor their biometric data (e.g., body temperature, heart rate, physical activity, and hydration levels). These sensors provide real-time feedback on physiological metrics, visualizing the current status through clear indicators (e.g., green for safety, yellow for caution, and red for critical) and encouraging workers to adopt health-promoting behaviors, such as taking breaks, drinking water, or relocating to shaded areas. Additionally, based on this data, supervisors can dynamically adjust workloads, reassign tasks to cooler locations, or shift work hours to avoid peak heat, ensuring safety and optimizing productivity in physically demanding outdoor environments. Over time, these measures become ingrained as standard practices, reducing heat-related illnesses and fostering a culture of health promotion.

Strengths and limitations

One of the primary strengths of this scoping review is that it broadens the usability of findings by expanding the scope to include the context-mechanism-outcome configurations [40]. While Cannady et al. [38] focus in a recent scoping review on identifying relevant devices and their reliability and validity, we synthesize the integration of the context-mechanism-outcome configurations that enhance the adaptability of insights across different contexts. The two reviews are a perfect complement to finding out which wearables can be used for heat-exposed outdoor workers [38] and to understand the respective mechanisms and rationale of how and why specific mechanisms lead to certain outcomes in certain contexts. This ensures that our findings are not limited to a particular domain or scenario, making the model more versatile and applicable to a broader range of settings.

Another strength review is the proposal of an explanatory intervention model that provides insights at different levels. This approach offers a model that can be useful for understanding and planning complex wearable device-based interventions for heat-exposed outdoor workers. By incorporating various dimensions, the model allows for more nuanced strategies in real-world applications, enhancing its practical relevance.

However, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, while a scoping review was conducted to inform the model development, it was not entirely systematic. This methodological choice was made to provide a broad overview of the available evidence. Still, it may have resulted in the omission of some relevant studies, limiting the comprehensiveness of the review. Consequently, while the scoping review provides valuable insights, future work would benefit from a fully systematic review with clear research questions to ensure that all relevant literature is considered.

Second, the subjective interpretation of findings presents a potential source of bias. Although we have taken measures to ensure objectivity, including interpretations based on expert opinions or previous literature may lead to conclusions influenced by prior assumptions.

Third, one might argue that other theories and models could have been considered to generate an explanatory intervention model proposal. However, given the large number of models, frameworks, or theories potentially to be considered for the generation of the explanatory intervention model, there was a need for a pragmatic decision regarding the number of models, frameworks, or theories to be taken forward [40, 92]. While the proposed model offers substantial contributions by expanding the usability of findings and integrating different factors, the limitations regarding subjectivity and the non-systematic nature of the review should be addressed in future research to enhance the rigor and reliability of the findings.

Implications and future research directions

The findings from this scoping review offer valuable insights into the application of wearable technology for heat-exposed outdoor workers, particularly in the context of environmental health literacy [82] and precision prevention in occupational health [101]. The key question of context-mechanism-outcome configurations can be addressed by considering how such technology can enhance individual awareness, health behavior, and employer responsibility, particularly in high-risk outdoor environments. Real-time physiological and environmental monitoring can improve environmental health literacy, increase awareness of personal risk factors, such as heat stress, and enable timely preventive actions. This heightened awareness may contribute to better health outcomes as workers become more informed about how environmental conditions affect their well-being.

The use of wearable sensors aligns with the principles of precision prevention in occupational health [102] by tailoring interventions to individual workers’ needs and resources. By continuously monitoring physiological indicators (such as heart rate and body temperature) and environmental factors (such as ambient temperature), this technology allows for personalized preventive strategies. Workers can receive individualized feedback on their risk of heat-related illness, which can help them take appropriate preventive measures, such as adjusting their work intensity or hydrating.

Based on the findings, several practical recommendations can be delineated regarding the dissemination of information: Employers and workers should be made aware of the availability and usefulness of wearable-based technology for both physiological and environmental monitoring. Educational campaigns or targeted communications can help bridge knowledge gaps, ensuring that both parties understand the potential benefits of such technologies. Monitoring results from wearable devices need to be communicated understandably. This is essential to improve outdoor workers’ understanding and awareness of their individual heat exposure risk [55]. Simplified, user-friendly interfaces and regular feedback on heat exposure should be integrated into wearable systems to enhance workers’ ability to interpret and act on the data [36, 60, 61]. Outdoor workers should be equipped with wearable-based technology as part of their personal protective equipment [37]. Employers can incorporate these devices as a token of appreciation, reflecting a commitment to worker health and safety [49, 81]. This can foster a sense of value and responsibility, increasing worker engagement with preventive practices.

Further research and targeted actions will be essential to assess the usability of wearables and the acceptance regarding data privacy/ownership [36] while optimizing the deployment and effectiveness of these technologies. To further enhance the effectiveness of interventions, new study designs such as micro-randomized trials and just-in-time adaptive interventions should be considered. Micro-randomized trials allow for continuously adapting interventions in real time [103, 104]. By randomizing at the right decision-making time, micro-randomized trials can provide insights into the effectiveness of specific interventions (e.g., rest breaks or hydration prompts) under different conditions. This study design is particularly valuable for assessing how well wearable device-based interventions work in dynamic environments like outdoor workplaces, where heat exposure fluctuates throughout the day. Just-in-time adaptive interventions use a personalized, context-aware intervention model that delivers support exactly when needed. For outdoor workers, just-in-time adaptive interventions may provide timely notifications based on their physiological data (e.g., rising body temperature or heart rate) and environmental conditions (e.g., increased heat exposure). This approach ensures that interventions, such as reminders to hydrate or reduce physical activity, are provided at the right time, in the right place, to the right individual [105,106,107], they are most beneficial, minimizing the risk of heat stress for outdoor workers.

Blog

Four players who missed Brentford’s defeat to Nottingham Forest last weekend are back in training and in contention for selection ahead of the Aston Villa clash on Saturday.

Mikkel Damsgaard was absent from the 3-1 defeat at the City Ground after becoming a father last weekend, but the midfielder is in contention for the Villans’ visit to TW8.

For decades, scientists have puzzled over dark energy, the mysterious force that makes up nearly 70% of the Universe and drives its accelerating expansion.

The power of DESI’s ‘5,000 eyes’

Black holes as cosmic power plants

Neutrinos and a cosmic mismatch

Durham’s key role in DESI

A turning point in cosmology