Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Author affiliation: University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (L. Aguilar-Bultet, E. Gómez-Sanz, I. Vock, R. Schindler, L. Maurer Pekerman, A.B. García-Martín, S. Tschudin-Sutter); Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (E. Gómez-Sanz); State Laboratory Basel-City, Basel (M. Alt, R. Furger, L. Eichenberger, C. Bagutti); Rothen Laboratory, Basel (I. Steffen); ETH Zurich, Basel (T. Stadler); Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel (T. Stadler)
Since 2017, the World Health Organization has classified extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Klebsiella pneumoniae as a critical public health priority (1). Healthcare settings are one known reservoir (2), but food might represent an underestimated and insufficiently investigated source (3–5). We investigated ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) in humans and the environment in Basel, Switzerland.
We designed and conducted a prospective study during June 2017–June 2019 to investigate the epidemiology of ESBL-PE in Basel, Switzerland (6) (Appendix). We collected monthly food and wastewater samples at predefined locations across Basel (7,8). The University Hospital Basel (USB) collected patient samples during routine clinical care. Microsynth AG (Balgach, Switzerland; https://www.microsynth.com) performed whole-genome sequencing of ESBL-PE isolates from clinical and food samples by using NextSeq 500 or 550 platforms (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) on 150-bp paired-end reads, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Appendix). We used core-genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) to determine genetic relatedness among sequences. We used the MinION Mk1B or GridION sequencer and R.10.4.1 flow cells (all Oxford Nanopore Technologies, https://nanoporetech.com) to conduct nanopore sequencing on selected isolates from genetically related clusters (Appendix).
We screened genomes from ESBL-PE isolates for antimicrobial resistance and plasmid genes. We conducted genomic comparisons against comprehensive international databases.
During the 13-month study period, 12 of 947 food isolates tested positive for K. pneumoniae and had ESBL subsequently confirmed through phenotyping. The first clinical ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae sequence type (ST) 14 isolate (P0745) was recovered in May 2018 from a urine sample collected from a female outpatient (patient A) in her 70s treated in the USB emergency department for abdominal pain and general weakness (Figure 1). She had a history of recurrent urinary tract infections. At that emergency department visit, catheter-associated urinary tract infection was diagnosed and treated with ertapenem for 14 days after ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae was confirmed (Appendix).
Another clinical ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae ST14 isolate (P1134) was collected in January 2019 from a urine sample of another female patient (patient B) in her 70s admitted to USB for a cardiac disorder (Figure 1). Isolate P1134 was detected on day 6 of hospitalization and assessed as colonization. We investigated possible direct or indirect contact between the 2 patients but found no epidemiologic link (Appendix).
Phylogenetic analysis revealed an ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae ST14 isolate from 1 food sample that clustered with samples from the 2 patients. The food isolate (F0067) was recovered from 1 alfalfa cress sample organically produced in Switzerland and purchased from a Basel supermarket on August 3, 2018 (Figure 1). We identified 2 additional ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates from samples collected from the same supermarket, 1 from mung beans purchased on November 9, 2018, and 1 from alfalfa cress purchased on February 8, 2019. All food samples were produced and packaged on the same farm in Switzerland. The 2 additional food isolates belonged to unrelated STs (the mung bean isolate was ST1310 and the second alfalfa cress isolate was ST2670), exhibited >1,990 allelic differences from F0067, and carried different combinations of ESBL genes and plasmid replicons (Appendix).
Genome comparison of isolates P0745, P1134, and F0067 revealed 6 cgMLST allelic differences and 12 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between F0067 and the clinical isolate of patient A (P0745). We also detected 3 cgMLST allelic differences and 7 SNPs difference between F0067 and the isolate from patient B (P1134). SNPs were scattered along the chromosomes, but none were in plasmids (Appendix Table 1).
cgMLST comparison of 967 global publicly available K. pneumoniae ST14 genomes and 14 isolates from our collection (including the clustered isolates) revealed 2 additional clinical isolates grouped within our cluster. Those isolates, collected in 2019 and 2020 at Jena University Hospital (Jena, Germany), showed 4–9 allelic differences from the isolates from Switzerland (Appendix Figure 2, panel A). The cluster reported in this study differed from other K. pneumoniae ST14 genomes by >58 alleles, and other isolates from Switzerland were dispersed across the minimum spanning tree, clustering with isolates from different countries and continents (Figure 2, panel A). The clustered isolates, including those from Germany, belonged to the same major lineage, indicating close phylogenetic relatedness (Appendix). Differences occurred only at the most specific level (10th node), suggesting minimal divergence within a clonal cluster.
The minimum mean average nucleotide identity among the 3 genomes from Basel was 99.99% (Appendix Figure 2, panel B). All isolates carried the KL2 capsule locus and the O1v2 locus, but we detected no additional known virulence genes. However, we detected a variant of the ESBL gene blaSHV-106, along with oqxA, oqxB, and fosA6, in those chromosomes (Appendix Table 2). The 3 isolates from Basel also shared a 120,635-bp ESBL plasmid of the IncFIA replicon type (Figure 2, panel B; Appendix Table 3), containing the ESBL gene blaCTX-M-15, and additional resistance genes for β-lactams (blaTEM-1B), sulfonamides (sul2), trimethoprim (dfrA14), aminoglycosides (aph(6)-Id, aph(3′′)-Ib), quinolones (qnrB1), and tetracycline (tetA) (Appendix Table 4). In addition, they shared a 193-kbp putative conjugative heavy metal resistance plasmid harboring genes for resistance to copper, arsenic, and silver (Appendix Table 3, Figure 3). We sequenced 1 additional K. pneumoniae ST14 isolate from patient B that shared most of those resistance genes and plasmid replicons, suggesting existence of a similar ESBL plasmid (Appendix Figure 1).
International comparison revealed plasmids from Basel had closest similarity (0.995 Mash identity [https://github.com/marbl/mash]) with a 130-kbp ESBL plasmid from a K. pneumoniae ST4 isolate collected in 2019 from wastewater in Japan (9) (Figure 2, panel B). That plasmid showed high synteny and included all antimicrobial resistance genes detected in the plasmids of the isolates from Switzerland and Germany (Appendix Table 4, Figure 4). However, the metal-resistant plasmid found in the isolates from Switzerland was absent from the isolates from Japan and Germany.
We describe a cluster of closely related ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae ST14 isolates from human clinical samples collected at 2 hospitals in Europe and an alfalfa cress sample collected during systematic food sampling. Although we could not confirm a direct link between the patients and the food source, the close genetic relatedness and the geographic proximity and sampling dates suggest a recent common ancestor. Those findings highlight that food could be a potential reservoir in the spread of ESBL-PE. The national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system in Switzerland indicated stable resistance trends in E. coli and K. pneumoniae over the past decade (https://www.anresis.ch/antibiotic-resistance/resistance-data-human-medicine), supporting the relevance of our findings despite the time lapse after sample collection.
ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae clonal group 14, particularly CTX-M-15 producers, have caused human outbreaks globally (10,11) and have been detected in various fruits and vegetables (3), wastewater treatment plants, and rivers (12). The broad ecological range demonstrates that clonal group’s adaptability and its potential to disseminate antimicrobial resistance genes among isolates from food, environmental, and human sources. The close relatedness of strains and plasmids from our study to others identified globally further supports that potential. The detection of a similar ESBL plasmid in a wastewater K. pneumoniae ST4 isolate from Japan suggests environmental dissemination among diverse genetic lineages. In addition, a plasmid with metal tolerance and resistance genes might enable those bacteria to persist in harsh environmental conditions. That case, combined with an ESBL–producing K. pneumoniae food–human cluster we reported previously (13), adds to the limited evidence that food might be an overlooked and underestimated source of clinically relevant ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae clones (4).
In conclusion, this study highlights the value of investigating foodborne transmission routes to control the spread of clinically relevant antimicrobial-resistant bacterial strains. Stricter hygiene practices might be required throughout the food production, handling, and consumption cycle to prevent further dissemination of ESBL-PE to the general population.
Dr. Aguilar-Bultet is a senior research associate in the Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Her research interests focus on bacterial genomics and its applications in epidemiology. Dr. Gómez-Sanz is an assistant professor at the Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, Switzerland. Her research interests focus on the transmission dynamics and persistence of bacterial antimicrobial resistance from a One Health perspective.
L.A.-B. and E.G.-S. collected and analyzed the data, created figures and tables and wrote the draft of the manuscript. I.V., M.A., R.S., L.M.P., R.F., L.E., I.S., A.B.G.-M., and T.S. contributed to data collection and revised the manuscript. C.B. conceptualized the study and critically revised the manuscript. S.T.S. conceptualized the study, obtained the funding and critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the article.
Top