Author: admin

Westrick, E. R. & Ward, W. T. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-Year to 20-Year Evidence-based surgical results. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 31, S61–S68. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd87d5 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Nam, Y., Choi, K., Jang, J., Kim, K. & Lee, G. Curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb angles between 40 and 50 degrees at the late stage of skeletal growth: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J. Clin. Med. 14 (15), 5272 (2025).

Google Scholar 

Miyanji, F. et al. A detailed analysis of the Lenke classification in surgical decision-making for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 8 (1), 41–48 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Ilharreborde, B. et al. Hybrid constructs for tridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative analysis of universal clamps versus hooks. Spine 35, 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4 (2010).

Google Scholar 

Cheung, K. M. C. & Luk, K. D. K. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending Radiograph*. J. Bone Joint Surg. 79, 1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199708000-00005 (1997).

Google Scholar 

Vedantam, R., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H. & Linville, D. L. Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves. Spine 25, 76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200001010-00014 (2000).

Klepps, S. J., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H., Bassett, G. S. & Whorton, J. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26, E74–E79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00002 (2001).

Google Scholar 

Hamzaoglu, A. et al. Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic. Scoliosis: Spine. 30, 1637–1642. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2 (2005).

Google Scholar 

Lenke classification system of adolescent. Idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Str. Course Lect 54, 537–542 (2005).

O’Brien, M. F., Kuklo, T. R. & Blanke, K. M. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2005).

Watanabe, K. et al. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during intraoperative halo-femoral traction in scoliosis surgery. Spine 32, E849–E852. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074da84 (2007).

Google Scholar 

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. GPower 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods. 39 (2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 (2007).

Google Scholar 

Faro, F. D., Marks, M. C., Pawelek, J. & Newton, P. O. Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29, 2284–2289. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000142224.46796.a7 (2004).

Google Scholar 

Ilharreborde, B. et al. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOSThree-Dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine 36, E1306–E1313. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182293548 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Vidal, C., Ilharreborde, B., Azoulay, R., Sebag, G. & Mazda, K. Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 22, 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2752-2 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Potter, B. K. et al. Reliability of End, Neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 30, 1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000170290.05381.9a (2005).

Julien-Marsollier, F. et al. Benefits of a spine team for the surgical management of paediatric scoliosis. Orthop. Traumatology: Surg. Res. 103976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103976 (2024).

Harrington, P. R. Technical details in relation to the successful use of instrumentation in scoliosis. Orthop Clin. North. Am (1972).

Moe, J. H. Methods of correction and surgical techniques in scoliosis. Orthop Clin. North. Am (1972).

Burton, D. C., Asher, M. A. & Lai, S-M. The selection of fusion levels using torsional correction techniques in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24, 1728. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908150-00015 (1999).

Ilharreborde, B., Sebag, G., Skalli, W. & Mazda, K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system. Eur. Spine J. 22, 2382–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2776-7 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Reames, D. L. et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of 19,360 cases of pediatric scoliosis: A review of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality database. Spine 36, 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f3a326 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Yagi, M., Takemitsu, M. & Machida, M. Chest cage angle difference and rotation of main thoracic curve are independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38, E1209–E1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e0309 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Sabharwal, S., Apazidis, A., Zhao, C., Hullinger, H. & Vives, M. Comparison of intraoperative supine and postoperative standing radiographs after posterior instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B. 20, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e328347c2bc (2011).

Google Scholar 

Learch, T. J., Massie, J. B., Pathria, M. N., Ahlgren, B. A. & Garfin, S. R. Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: A proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation. Spine 29, 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000112071.69448.A1 (2004).

Google Scholar 

Cheh, G. et al. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 32, 2668–2672. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5269 (2007).

Google Scholar 

Swany, L. M., Larson, A. N., Buyuk, A. F. & Milbrandt, T. A. Comparison of slot-scanning standing, supine, and fulcrum radiographs for assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. Spine Deform. 9, 1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00349-9 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Ramchandran, S. et al. Impact of supine radiographs to assess curve flexibility in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Glob. Spine J. 12, 1731–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988271 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Han, S-M. et al. Spinal sagittal alignment and postoperative adding-on in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after surgery. Orthop. Traumatol. 108, 103352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103352 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Vidal, C., Ilharreborde, B., Queinnec, S. & Mazda, K. Role of intraoperative radiographs in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 36, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000428 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Rodrigues, L. M. R. et al. Comparison between different radiographic methods for evaluating the flexibility of scoliosis curves. Acta Ortop. Bras. 22, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220200844 (2014).

Google Scholar 

Lenke, L. G. et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. (2001).

Thawrani, D., Agabegi, S. S., Eismann, E., Martin, R. & Sturm, P. F. Accuracy and reliability of drawing central sacral vertical line on scoliosis radiographs in clinical practice. Spine Deformity. 1, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.003 (2013).

Google Scholar 

Uneri, A. et al. Intraoperative evaluation of device placement in spine surgery using known-component 3D–2D image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 3330–3351. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa62c5 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Jeantet, R-E., Simon, A-L., Happiette, A. & Ilharreborde, B. Bivertebral pedicle-supralaminar autostable claw for proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in early-onset scoliosis. Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103634 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Luhmann, S. J., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H. & Schootman, M. Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34, 2191–2197. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a (2009).

Google Scholar 

Jones, M. et al. A united Kingdom single centre review of the impact of extended waiting times in Early-Onset scoliosis: the effect of a delay to surgical treatment of greater than 12 months. Spine Deformity. 5, 446–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.018 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Ohrt-Nissen, S., Luk, K. D. K., Samartzis, D. & Cheung, J. P. Y. Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra? Eur. Spine J. 29, 2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06398-4 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Compagnon, R. et al. Side bending radiographs and lowest instrumented vertebra in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A French quality-of-care study. Orthop. Traumatol. 108, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103350 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Iida, T. et al. Performance of forward roll maneuvers following corrective spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis patients. Orthop. Traumatol. 107, 103034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103034 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Dang, N. R., Moreau, M. J., Hill, D. L., Mahood, J. K. & Raso, J. Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the spinal deformity study groups AIS radiographic measurement Manual. Spine 30, 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000160840.51621.6b (2005).

Ogon, M. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of lenke’s new scoliosis classification system. Spine 27, 858–862. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204150-00014 (2002).

Kuklo, T. R., Potter, B. K., Schroeder, T. M. & O’Brien, M. F. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 31, 1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000217774.13433.a7 (2006).

Mok, J. M. et al. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33, 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d (2008).

Liu, R. W. et al. Comparison of supine Bending, Push-Prone, and traction under general anesthesia radiographs in predicting curve flexibility and postoperative correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 35, 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3564a (2010).

Google Scholar 

Jeandel, C. et al. Enhanced recovery following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A medical and economic study in a French private nonprofit pediatric hospital. Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103626 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Langlais, T. et al. Sagittal plane assessment of manual concave rod bending for posterior correction in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis (Lenke 1 and 3). Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103654 (2023).

Baldairon, F. et al. Analysis of factors associated with sagittal alignment deterioration after correction of degenerative scoliosis by in situ contouring. Orthop. Traumatol. 107, 103023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103023 (2021).