As the race finally started after a nervy weekend for McLaren, the pressure was high after the team had suffered two difficult races in the grands prix preceding this one.
A double disqualification in Las Vegas followed by a botched strategy that…

As the race finally started after a nervy weekend for McLaren, the pressure was high after the team had suffered two difficult races in the grands prix preceding this one.
A double disqualification in Las Vegas followed by a botched strategy that…

Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.
The early 1970s were a turbulent time in America — marked by soaring inflation, an oil crisis and a sharp drop in stock prices that left investors scrambling for safe havens.
And, according to billionaire investor Ray Dalio, history may be repeating itself. Surging prices and massive government spending could prompt investors to once again question the value of fiat currencies and the paper assets tied to them (1).
“It’s very much like the early ’70s … where do you put your money in?” Dalio said at the Greenwich Economic Forum (2). “When you are holding money, and you put it in a debt instrument, and when there’s such a supply of debt and debt instruments, it’s not an effective storehold of wealth.”
Dalio has long warned about the sheer size of America’s national debt, now hovering around $37.86 trillion and climbing. He has described the situation as a potential “debt death spiral” — where the government must borrow just to pay the interest on existing debt. Over time, this process accelerates.
If that number feels abstract, Dalio has a more personal warning.
The asset he’s talking about is something nearly everyone holds in one way or another, whether in bank accounts or under mattresses: the U.S. dollar.
In a recent post on X, Dalio shared a Q&A with the Financial Times (3). When asked what would happen to bonds and the dollar if a politically weakened Federal Reserve lets inflation run hot, his answer was blunt:
“It would lead bonds and the dollar to go down in value and if not rectified, would lead to them being an ineffective storehold of wealth and the breaking down of the monetary order as we know it.”
That comment couldn’t have come at a more sensitive time for the Federal Reserve. President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked Chair Jerome Powell and is searching for a replacement.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC in late November, “I think there’s a very good chance that the president will make an announcement before Christmas … I think it’s time for the Fed just to move back into the background, like, it used to do, calm things down and work for the American people (4).”
Bridal designer Hayley Paige’s career path hasn’t always been smooth.
Paige, 39, has been designing wedding dresses from a young age, she tells CNBC Make It, and she started her namesake bridal line in 2011 with her former employer, bridal house JLM Couture.
Her career took a turn in 2021 when she lost ownership of her professional name and her intellectual property during a four-year legal battle with JLM Couture.
Last year, Paige was able to buy back the rights to her name, intellectual property and social media accounts in a settlement agreement after JLM Couture filed for bankruptcy.
Since then, she’s relaunched her bridal brand and founded an organization, A Girl You Might Know Foundation, dedicated to helping other creatives learn about and protect their legal rights.
Working in a creative industry may seem glamorous, but Paige has some “unsexy” advice for young artists: “You have to invest in learning the bare bones of business, and how to protect yourself.”
A major lesson Paige learned through her experience is that “there’s just so much on the business side that you really have to be patient with” before leaping into a new venture, she says.
One piece of advice that Paige used to subscribe to is that once you have an idea, you should “get out there and do it” and “figure it out as you go,” she says.
She understands the sentiment, she says: oftentimes people “get caught up in the details of perfectionism,” which can hold them back from pursuing their goals.
However, given what she learned from her legal battle, Paige now advocates for a more cautious approach.
Before launching a business venture, entering a partnership or signing a contract, “you have to take a beat to really make sure you’re stepping out with the right foot forward,” Paige says.
“You can’t be so eager to just get out there that you don’t have your trademark, you don’t have your copyrights, you don’t have your LLC set up, you’re exposed with liability, you’re getting into partnerships without contracts, or with bad contracts,” she continues.
After Paige regained ownership of her name and trademark, she spent several months setting up LLCs and ensuring that her creative rights were protected before relaunching her brand.
It’s much harder to “go back and fight for things” once you’ve already set a precedent, according to Paige.
Rebuilding her brand also taught Paige a lot about what kind of boss she wanted to be, she says.
“I’ve always been somebody that I want people to enjoy working with me, because I feel like they will do their best work when they feel passionate about it, and they’re being treated with respect and acknowledged,” she says.
Integrity is a key aspect of her leadership philosophy: Paige says starting over gave her the opportunity to build her brand on a “foundation of morals.”
This time around, she’s also focused on building healthy partnerships, she says. Paige now works with Australia-based bridal company Madi Lane Bridal Group, which serves as the exclusive manufacturing, distribution and sales partner for her new bridal line.
Paige still feels she has a lot to learn — “even to this day, after launching a small business and a nonprofit, there’s still so much I don’t know,” she says — but she’s committed to honing her “creative and strategic governance” skills.
“Everything you do really has to be methodical and strategized and really thought through,” Paige says.
Want to stand out, grow your network, and get more job opportunities? Sign up today for Smarter by CNBC Make It’s new online course, How to Build a Standout Personal Brand: Online, In Person, and At Work. Learn how to showcase your skills, build a stellar reputation, and create a digital presence that AI can’t replicate.
Plus, sign up for CNBC Make It’s newsletter to get tips and tricks for success at work, with money and in life, and request to join our exclusive community on LinkedIn to connect with experts and peers.

Volatile compounds drifting on the breeze. Electrical pulses firing under bark. Scientists are discovering that trees are anything but silent.
Future via Getty Images
Typically, the first thing you’re struck by after walking into a forest is…

The discovery came after an international team of paleontologists, including researchers from Penn State and the New Mexico Museum of Natural History, re-examined fossils that had been found in the region back in 1916. Their findings, published…

Check your Chrome settings now.
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto
Google warns that “defending against account takeovers” is getting harder, as hackers intensify their efforts to steal passwords, multi-factor authentication tokens and cookies. While losing…

Fizkes | Istock | Getty Images
Divorce always raises thorny questions of how to divide marital property. In most cases, the remedy is pretty straightforward, requiring a surgical split between the two parties’ assets — although you can’t do that with the family dog or aquarium. But if you thought deciding who gets the dog was complicated, here comes cryptocurrency.
With the crypto wealth accumulation phase still new within many households, and the recent sharp decline in digital assets including bitcoin and ether dinging the confidence of investors who had just seen record highs, the path forward is murky. But for many married Americans, the current price of crypto doesn’t even register as an issue. That’s because the assets are easily squirreled away from an unsuspecting spouse.
“In divorce cases, crypto is creating the same headaches we’ve long seen with offshore accounts, except now the assets can be moved instantly and invisibly,” said Mark Grabowski, professor of cyber law and digital ethics at Adelphi University and author of several books about cryptocurrencies. He added that the problem is that ownership isn’t determined by a name on an account — it’s determined by who holds the private keys.
“If one spouse controls the wallet, they effectively control the assets,” Grabowski said.
Lawyers now have to subpoena exchanges, trace transactions on the blockchain, and determine whether coins were purchased before or during the marriage.
“Without that transparency and given the lack of reporting standards, it’s easy for one spouse to hide or underreport holdings. Courts are still catching up,” Grabowski said.
In theory, though, a crypto divorce should work like any other. Renee Bauer, a divorce attorney who has dealt with crypto splits, says the biggest question couples fight about is simple on the surface: who gets the wallet?
“That question opens the door to a mess of complications that traditional property division never had to deal with,” Bauer said.
The first challenge is figuring out what actually exists.
“A retirement account comes with statements. A house has an address. Crypto may be sitting in an online exchange or in a hardware wallet that one spouse conveniently forgot to mention,” Bauer said.
Tracing it then becomes part detective work and part digital forensics. Once the digital asset is authenticated, hashing out custody comes next.
“Some spouses want to keep the digital wallet intact, especially if they are the one who managed it during the marriage, while others want a clean monetary split,” Bauer said.
Courts are still figuring out the best way to handle this.
“There is also the security piece. If one spouse hands over private keys, they are effectively turning over total control. If they refuse, the court has to decide how to enforce access,” Bauer said.
She recounts seeing one lawyer who didn’t know much about crypto try to give the other spouse credit for the value of the bitcoin in another asset, not recognizing it’s not so simple, nor fair.
“Many divorce lawyers are slow to catch up and don’t even ask for disclosure. In my state of Connecticut, there isn’t a spot for crypto specifically on the financial affidavits. And for some, that could mean missing a valuable asset if they aren’t looking for it,” Bauer said.
One of the few companies that can help locate a missing asset is BlockSquared Forensics. Ryan Settles, founder and CEO of the Texas-based company, says that the need for his services has increased exponentially since he founded his company in 2023. BlockSquared is dedicated exclusively to the crypto aspects of family law and divorce.
If a spouse (generally women, Settles says) suspects their partner is hiding crypto, their attorney may call in BlockSquared, which does anything from simple asset verification to deep investigations, tracing crypto across continents and into the murky world of wallets and exchanges. Settles’ company will then present the spouse with a “storyboard” that traces and timestamps the movement of cryptocurrencies.
Investigating whether one spouse has crypto is becoming increasingly common, he says, “especially folks involved in high-net-worth divorces and individuals with high net worth.”
Ryan Settles, founder and CEO of the Texas-based company BlockSquared Forensics, which offers services from simple asset verifications to deep investigations, often for women going through divorces who were unaware of spouses’ crypto holdings.
Ryan Settles
Ferreting out crypto in a divorce is only going to become more common. Settles noted that millennials hold the highest amount of crypto, and over the next six months, this age group will be approaching peak divorce years, converging with increased crypto holdings.
Another aspect Settles looks at is tax liability for the spouse, making sure that gets addressed during the divorce.
“There are a significant number of tax issues that most people, even attorneys, are not even familiar with,” Settles says, adding that the number of taxable events and reporting requirements from even a single transaction can come as a surprise to even the most seasoned litigators.
“Most attorneys don’t understand it, don’t understand the terminology. There is a whole lot of trust without verification going on,” Settles said.
Many of his cases involve wives who were not only unaware of their husband’s crypto dabbling, but when the assets are finally split, can be socked with a massive tax bill from capital gains.
“Unlike a savings account, the value of crypto can swing wildly in a single day,” Bauer said. “Selling crypto to divide proceeds can trigger capital gains. Holding it can trigger new arguments when value changes,” Bauer added.
Relatively relaxed Internal Revenue Service reporting requirements for crypto have not helped, though they are set to get stricter starting with the 2025 tax year.
“There are so many pieces. There are a lot of attorneys doing nod and smile and pretend to understand,” Settles said.
But companies like his are usually brought in only when there is a good suspicion of a spouse hiding significant crypto assets, he said. With a retainer fee of $9,000 and investigations that can cost $50,000, Settles says his services often cost more than an attorney.
Roman Beck, a professor at Bentley University, where he directs the Crypto Ledger Lab, says that because this is a relatively new area, it’s best to look at it as courts not dividing the digital wallet but instead the assets the wallet controls.
“The law treats crypto much less exotically than people think. The starting point is simple: for tax and most property-law purposes, cryptocurrency is treated as property, not as money,” Beck said.
In divorce, that means bitcoin, ether, stablecoins, and NFTs acquired during the marriage are usually part of the marital estate, just like a brokerage account or a second home, with how that property is split depending on the state.
“Courts don’t split wallets, they split value,” Beck said.
The real legal question is not “Who gets the wallet?” he said, but ‘How do we allocate the economic value the wallet represents, and who is trusted with technical custody afterward?”
This leaves courts and lawyers to do one of three things: split the holdings on-chain, sell and split fiat, or offset with other assets.
“From a technical point of view, a wallet is just a set of private keys, often spread across hardware devices, mobile apps, or even seed phrases on a piece of paper. You cannot safely ‘share’ a hardware wallet or a private key after divorce,” Beck said.
Another wrinkle in a crypto divorce is the volatility of the underlying asset, with price swings in the currency making it more difficult for couples to agree on timing of a split, both as a couple and for the digital assets. In the past two months alone, bitcoin fell from a high over $126,000 to the low $80,000s, a 35% decline, and saw its year-to-date gains wiped out, with plenty of wild daily swings.
If couples are thinking rationally and not emotionally, among the simplest solutions would be splitting the wallet on a chain to create two wallets for each of the divorced partners so they can continue holding their share of cryptos, or drawing up a legal agreement that gives shares of a wallet to each party.
“They would not have to sell immediately,” Beck said.
However, often one party is not familiar with holding a wallet and thus not comfortable with that solution.
Similar to a house jointly owned which a divorcing couple may not want to bring to the market at a bad time, a couple could also agree to turn over crypto holdings to trusted third party to act as agent on behalf of both and to sell the crypto once the market has improved — once a certain agreed upon minimum value has been reached.
But Beck added that while from an economic and technical point of view there is no barrier preventing a divorcing couple from keeping crypto assets using any of these methods to allocate a legal percentage to each partner and delay liquidation until market conditions improved, both parties need to agree, and “most just want to be done,” he said.
One positive it that despite crypto’s reputation as a haven of anonymity, other aspects of digital assets work well for divorce proceedings.
“Public blockchains like bitcoin and ethereum are transparent ledgers. Every transaction is recorded forever. In other words, on-ledger data analytics turns the blockchain into a very patient financial witness,” Beck said. “That leaves a perfect audit trail if you know how to read the chain. … The real frontier isn’t the law, it’s the forensics,” he added.
Crypto’s adoption by many Americans — surveys in recent years from Gallup and Pew Research estimate that 14% to 17% of U.S. adults have owned cryptocurrency — is forcing family law to become more data-driven.
“The combination of transparent ledgers and powerful analytics gives lawyers and judges better tools to reconstruct financial behavior than they ever had with cash. The policy question going forward is not whether we can trace, but how far courts will go in requiring that level of scrutiny in everyday divorces,” Beck said.
Still, that doesn’t mean people won’t keep trying to hide assets. Settles says that often within 20 minutes he’ll see movement on the ledgers.
“They’ll start scrambling their assets, moving things, hiding things, moving them to tumblers. It’s quite fascinating,” Settles said.
And traceable.

A view of the “Embracing the Moon — China’s Lunar Exploration Achievements Exhibition” at the Shenzhen Science & Technology Museum, featuring models of Chang’e lunar probes and a mascot figure celebrating China’s space program. Photos courtesy…

Raz Shaw’s exuberant production of Singin’ in the Rain opens with nothing on stage but a coat and hat. They belong to leading man Don Lockwood (a charismatic Louis Gaunt), who taps out a quick dance before shrugging them on and transforming…


QUETTA: Balochistan Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti on Sunday said that there was no military operation underway in Balochistan, clarifying that only intelligence-based operations (IBOs) were being conducted in…