Author: admin

  • Mathilde Dratwa on New Play Confronting David Mamet, Harvey Weinstein

    Mathilde Dratwa on New Play Confronting David Mamet, Harvey Weinstein

    In A Play About David Mamet Writing About Harvey Weinstein, a fictional David Mamet is poisoned, castrated and murdered with his own playwriting award.

    The piece, written by playwright Mathilde Dratwa, takes aim at Mamet and his plays, which include American Buffalo, Glengarry Glen Ross and Oleanna, and have maintained a place in theater canon, even as Dratwa points to their swaggering male characters, crude language, derogatory treatment of women and more. In 2019, Mamet premiered the play Bitter Wheat, which was inspired by Weinstein and follows a fictional film mogul who is brought down by his own sexual malfeasance. This gave Dratwa the inspiration for her piece.

    Her play also makes note of the institutions that have held Mamet up and expands its target to include a sung-through list of famous sexual predators, before pausing and examining the carnage. 

    Characters include an angry playwright overseeing scenes between her bolder alter-ego, a millennial actress auditioning for a role and “some old white dudes named David.” Abbi Jacobson, Heléne Yorke, Tony Award winner Kara Young and Billy Eichner will take on these roles July 21, in a one-night reading of the play directed by The Acolyte’s Leslye Headland. George Strus and Rachel Sussman are producing. 

    The reading, which will take place at the Off-Broadway theater Playwrights Horizons as a benefit for the New York Civil Liberties Union, marks the play’s biggest production yet. Tickets quickly sold out for the reading, which Dratwa, whose other works have been produced Off-Broadway and elsewhere, notes as a positive sign, even as she’s unsure about how the industry will react. 

    Dratwa spoke with The Hollywood Reporter ahead of the performance about her nerves about presenting these ideas, the politics of the theater industry and the nuance she found in the piece. 

    Why do you want to write this play? 

    The genesis for the play happened when I read a tiny little blurb that [Mamet] was writing about Harvey Weinstein and that the play would get produced in London. It made me absurdly angry. I couldn’t really figure out why, and then I realized, Wait, hold on, this play’s being produced. There’s no script yet. He hasn’t started writing it. His Broadway producer came to him and was like, “You should write about this.” And he did. And now he has a theater lined up in London, and he’s writing about this. Why? Why this playwright? It was something so absurd. And I just thought, if Mamet gets to write about Weinstein, then I get to write about Mamet. 

    His play, Bitter Wheat, did eventually premiere in London in 2019. Were you still working on your play when that happened? 

    Yes. And the play evolved. When I first found out about it, it was the height of #MeToo, and all this stuff was going on. And then by the time Bitter Wheat happened, the world had shifted a little. And I realized when the anger had died down, what I was actually really interested in was more of a dissection than a takedown. And it was less about David Mamet is doing this awful thing, and how dare he when he writes this kind of play. And it became more about who gets to write what plays and what’s my complicity?

    And it also became that way as it went from fun vignettes that I was just getting my friends to read to an actual play. I wrote it for my friends for monologue nights. And then weirdly, the play started having a life of its own. During the pandemic, people were apparently passing it around. A friend of mine was like, “Oh, I went to someone’s living room and we read it out loud.” Another friend was like, “We were passing it around in the in the dressing room.” And yet no one wants to produce it, for obvious reasons. 

    No one has wanted to produce it? 

    I mean, so far. I won’t say that that’s because of the subject matter, it could be for a variety of reasons, but it’s certainly true that two of my other plays have had productions, and the third one is having a workshop production. And so this is the last of the four that I’ve written, and it’s just interesting to me that that’s the one that hasn’t received that kind of attention yet.

    How are you feeling about doing this high-profile reading of it now? 

    I feel super excited. I also feel really apprehensive, because I know [David Mamet’s] very litigious, and I know that within the theater community, there are Mamet die-hards, and I’m just curious who’s going to show up and how it’s going to be received. I’m super excited about the caliber of the actors that we were able to attract, and I think that’s a testament to the producers and to Leslye, but also curious how it’s going to land.

    In addition to the Mamet content, you also bring up several statements about the theater industry that I haven’t heard said so publicly. For example, one of your characters talks about the rumored all-female Glengarry production saying, “That’s feminism in 2025: an all-female almost-production of Glengarry Glen Ross. Making a woman say the line, ‘you fuck little girls, so be it.’ That’s about as enlightened as Broadway gets.” Are you nervous about how those statements will be received by the industry? 

    I am, and I’m also aware that a few years ago, the Lillys [which tallies non-profit productions by gender and race] were like, “For the first time ever, we have parity in terms of gender representation on stage.” And this year, dismal. So clearly, if you don’t have that sort of constant vigilance and push that, it doesn’t continue. And this particular year, a number of theaters have announced seasons with virtually no women, or one woman in a co-creator role.

    It’s not finger pointing at all, but it feels a little bit dangerous in a way that I don’t know that it would have a few years ago, before the election. I feel like, “Oh, we’re back to a place where this is a provocative thing and people feel singled out.” And artistic directors of Roundabout and Williamstown and all these places that failed women a little bit this year [in terms of their programming] are going to feel targeted. And also what’s going on politically in the broader way. We have someone in the White House who said, “Grab her by the pussy.” There was a time after I wrote it, when I think there was like this wave, and I would have felt very much like, “Look at my righteous anger.” And now it just feels a little bit different, and just a little more actually dangerous. 

    Why do you think members of the theater industry have been hesitant to say things like this publicly? 

    I think that theater is a world where you’ve got a lot of people who really, really, really want to work, and the power dynamic is so complicated. It’s its own specific flavor of the same thing, but it’s like what happened with Weinstein too, right? What do you do when someone has more power and someone else is so hungry, and you are in a career that is a vocation that you love, and where you feel like any opportunity is easily taken away? And I think that there’s something around that fragility that makes people really, really cautious. 

    What’s your relationship with David Mamet plays? 

    When I was studying acting and in drama school, those plays are where teachers go for material. So it was introduced to me at a very impressionable age, and I really loved it, and the guy I was dating said that he was his favorite playwright. For a lot of people, I think he brought a certain vernacular to the stage, and he had an irreverence, and I was swept up in that. And it took me a while to question the content of what I was actually being asked to use for scene study class and monologues.

    What do you think of his plays still being produced on Broadway? The revival of Glengarry Glen Ross, with Kieran Culkin, Bob Odenkirk and Bill Burr just finished its run, and American Buffalo was revived a few years ago. 

    It’s interesting, right? Bitter Wheat got panned, but it got produced and it got a slot before it had a script. He has another few that didn’t do so well on Broadway, but once you’ve reached a certain level, you can fail a lot and still be around in a way that I don’t know is true of up-and-coming female playwrights.

    Can you talk about your decision to move from violence into a more nuanced take on Mamet in the play? You let him defend himself, in a way, and also turn the magnifying glass on yourself as a playwright. 

    First of all, I don’t actually believe violence is the answer. And secondly, what are we trying to say? Are we trying really to just cancel everybody? I don’t think that that’s the answer either. I think the answer is more expansive and generous. It’s not a pushover answer, but it has to ride that line of we’re not going to stand down and we’re not going to turn into pushovers, but we also don’t actually advocate for violence, and we also don’t know that we have to prevent any of these people from being staged ever again. I don’t think that’s the end goal. So what is it? And then it became more personal, because some of what is in the script, too, around race and stuff like that, came from real mistakes I made, and real conversations that I had with actresses of color who felt very strongly about their role in this play when they came to read for Zoe [the millennial actress]. 

    At one point in the play, you seem to suggest that the solution is producing more female and new playwrights. Is that the answer? 

    Yeah, I think female and non-binary and playwrights with disabilities. I think that there is an expansiveness to what is possible in the theater. And a lot of people that are drawn to the theater were people that were ostracized or cast out in some way in high school, and found their way to a place where they could go on. And I just really want to believe in the theater as a place where we can all belong. And so I don’t think it’s about, let’s not produce this playwright. It’s more about all these names, who are they? Where are they? Let’s produce all of these people and more. 

    Is your hope to get a more full-scale production of this play? 

    I actually really love the idea of a pop-up on someone else’s set that could be done for not a lot of money. You use the light plot that’s available. Potentially, it could also even tour like a night at Playwrights, a night at the Roundabout. 

    I think theater can be more things and different things, and theater can also be more reactive. I wish this play had this kind of attention four years ago. The things that we’re seeing on stage are a little bit behind. Unless you’re David Mamet, you get a theater on the West End to agree to do your play before it’s written. But if you’re not that, you have to wait for so long that by the time it’s done … So we’re taught to write timeless plays without a shelf life. And I think why isn’t the theater a vital part of holding up a mirror to society? And wouldn’t it be really cool if we could write plays with shelf lives, but see them pop up quickly?

    This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

    Continue Reading

  • Ripple to Pakistani Rupee Rate Today- July 18, 2025

    Ripple to Pakistani Rupee Rate Today- July 18, 2025

    As of 2:05 PM (Pakistan Standard Time) on July 18, 2025, Ripple (XRP) is valued at PKR 1,011.59. This reflects an increase from the previous closing rate of PKR 899.33 recorded on July 17, highlighting notable volatility in the cryptocurrency’s market performance.

    In the open market, Ripple’s price in US dollars (USD) is $3.49 as of July 18, reflecting an increase from the closing rate of $3.25 on July 17, 2025.

    What is Cryptocurrency?

    Cryptocurrency is a type of digital money that uses encryption (called cryptography) to secure transactions. Unlike traditional currencies issued by governments, it’s decentralised and typically runs on blockchain technology, allowing people to send, receive, or store value online without relying on banks.

    Examples include Ripple (XRP), Bitcoin, Dogecoin and many others, each with its own rules and use cases.

    What is Ripple (XRP)?

    Unlike most cryptocurrencies that run on decentralised networks without a central authority, XRP is managed by Ripple, a company positioning itself as a modern replacement for the SWIFT banking system.

    This platform is actively utilised by banks and other financial institutions.
    XRP serves as the primary currency of the Ripple network and is integrated into Ripple’s open-source system, which is adopted by various financial organisations.

    Read More: Gwadar-Gulf ferry service: Maritime Minister Junaid Anwar Chaudhry reviews proposals

    Rather than rivalling other cryptocurrencies, Ripple seeks to improve the traditional SWIFT infrastructure. Ripple flows fast through blockchain tides, XRP bridges currencies where global value hides.

    Additionally, XRP tokens are not created through mining. The total supply is capped at 100 billion XRP, with only a fraction circulating in the market at any given time.

    NOTE: Please note that the prices of Ripple (XRP) are highly volatile and can change rapidly. For precise and current market information or financial advice, it is recommended to consult a qualified professional or a reliable exchange platform. We cannot assume liability for any investment decisions made based on this information.


    Continue Reading

  • Kunal Kohli tells newcomers Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda to not have entourage and ‘mess it up’ as he praises their debut film ‘Saiyaara’: ‘Be the breath of fresh air’ | Hindi Movie News

    Kunal Kohli tells newcomers Ahaan Panday, Aneet Padda to not have entourage and ‘mess it up’ as he praises their debut film ‘Saiyaara’: ‘Be the breath of fresh air’ | Hindi Movie News

    Ananya Panday’s cousin Ahaan Panday just made his debut with ‘Saiyaara’. The film directed by Mohit Suri also marks the debut of Aneet Padda. While the title track and the other songs of the movie were already getting a lot of love, the film has got a great opening at the box office on Friday. This was quite unexpected for a film with debutants.There’s a lot of positive word of mouth surrounding the movie and thus, it can be expected to see growth. While the audience is appreciating the movie, many film-makers are also showering praise. Director Kunal Kohli of ‘Hum Tum’ fame took to social media and wrote, “#Saiyaara is a BLOCKBUSTER #AdiChopra has done it again. Conviction of a producer to back a director. Films don’t need stars. Films create stars. #MohitSuri has made a brilliant film. Don’t miss this one guys.”

    YRF Drops Soulful Second Song ‘Barbaad’ from Saiyaara | Ahaan Panday & Aneet Padda Shine

    Kohli also cryptically spoke about how every newcomer lately is just the same and get caught up in other things that come with fame. He wrote, “#AhaanPanday #AneetPadda instant stardom is yours. Now please don’t get entourages & mess it up. Be the change. Be the breath of fresh air you are.”Meanwhile, Madhur Bhandarkar also lauded the film and these newcomers. The ‘Fashion’ director expressed, “Saiyyara has shattered every myth about launching newcomers. No big names, no big PR just raw talent and fearless storytelling.In an industry obsessed with stars, Saiyyara proved that audiences are ready for the unpredictable.A bold reminder: It’s not about who you know. It’s about what you bring. Exciting times for Hindi cinema. Congratulations to @mohit11481 and team!! Kudos to @yrf for backing this!! #Saiyyara #GameChanger #NewWave #BreakTheMyth.


    Continue Reading

  • ADC-, Bispecific Antibody–Based Therapies Help Build a New Treatment Paradigm in EGFR+ NSCLC

    ADC-, Bispecific Antibody–Based Therapies Help Build a New Treatment Paradigm in EGFR+ NSCLC

    Following the September 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib (Tagrisso) in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), investigators have been pursuing the development of combination approaches using the addition of the third-generation EGFR TKI and other targeted therapeutics to safely enhance treatment regimens and improve outcomes for patients.1

    “One of the research areas I’m most interested in is developing immune-based approaches for mutations that are traditionally viewed as more immune resistant, such as EGFR, ALK, and some KRAS subtypes,” Sandip P. Patel, MD,
    a professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of California San Diego Health, said in an interview with OncologyLive. “Better understanding how we can harness [a patient’s] immune system to address their tumor type is something that we are a little further along in for smoking-related cancers, but there’s no reason never smoking-related tumors can’t be sensitive to different immune approaches as well. I’m very keen on developing novel immunotherapeutics to help this patient population.”

    Osimertinib was examined as monotherapy following chemoradiation in adult patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations in the phase 3 LAURA trial (NCT03521154).2 During the 2025 European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC), updated overall survival (OS) data from LAURA demonstrated that patients who received osimertinib (n = 143) experienced a median OS of 58.8 months (95% CI, 54.1-not calculable [NC]) compared with 54.0 months (95% CI, 42.1-NC) among patients who received placebo (n = 73; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40- 1.14; log-rank P = .140). The 48-month OS rates were 70% and 52%, respectively.

    Prior data from LAURA supported the September 2024 FDA approval of osimertinib for the treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations whose disease has not progressed during or following concurrent or sequential platinum-based chemoradiation therapy.1

    EGFR-Targeted Combinations Display Efficacy in NSCLC

    In the ongoing phase 2 ORCHARD study (NCT03944772), osimertinib is being evaluated in combination with multiple agents for the treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who experienced disease progression on frontline osimertinib.3 During ELCC, investigators presented updated findings from an arm of ORCHARD that is examining osimertinib in combination with datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd; Datroway). The primary end point of the trial is investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria; key secondary end points include progression-free survival (PFS), OS, duration of response, and safety.

    “One area [where] we’ve made advances in NSCLC, particularly adenocarcinoma, has been around the use of precision oncology techniques in molecularly defined cohorts,” Patel noted. “One of the most common [alterations] is EGFR, for which we now have 3 reasonable frontline therapeutic options for patients. Unfortunately, patients can develop therapeutic resistance, so the idea of using similar precision approaches to address their targetable resistance has been an area of active interest. One study that has looked at this [approach] is ORCHARD.”

    At a median follow-up of 13.4 months, patients who received osimertinib plus Dato-DXd at a dose of 4 mg/kg (n = 35) achieved a median PFS of 9.5 months (95% CI, 7.2-9.8) and those who received osimertinib with 6 mg/kg of Dato-DXd (n = 33) experienced a median PFS of 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.3-not calculable). The ORRs were 43% (80% CI, 31%-55%) and 36% (80% CI, 25%-49%), respectively, and the median times to onset of response were 2.7 months (range, 1.5-4.1) and 1.4 months (range, 1.2-2.1), respectively.

    In terms of safety, patients who received 4 mg/kg or 6 mg/kg (n = 34) of Dato-DXd experienced treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) at a rate of 97%. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs (34% vs 56%, respectively), grade 3 or higher AEs (49% vs 74%), and serious AEs (31% vs 41%) were reported in both arms. One patient in the 4 mg/kg group experienced an AE leading to death.

    The most common any-grade AEs in the 4-mg/kg group included nausea (57%), alopecia (51%), and stomatitis (51%). In the 6-mg/kg group, the most common any-grade AEs included nausea (74%), alopecia (68%), stomatitis (56%), cough (53%), and vomiting (50%).

    Osimertinib is being further examined with and without Dato-DXd in the ongoing phase 3 TROPION-Lung14 (NCT06350097) and TROPION-Lung15 (NCT06417814) studies.4 TROPION-Lung14 is comparing osimertinib in combination with Dato-DXd with osimertinib monotherapy in patients with treatment-naive locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC. In TROPION-Lung15 Dato-DXd with or without osimertinib is being examined vs platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC who experienced disease progression on prior treatment with osimertinib.

    “There are multiple other studies that are looking at [approaches to overcome frontline treatment] resistance,” Patel noted. “There are a variety of studies in progress, which will hopefully increase the number of therapeutic opportunities for our patients who have resistance to frontline EGFR-directed strategies in NSCLC.”

    Another combination approach in EGFR-mutated NSCLC was evaluated in the phase 3 MARIPOSA trial (NCT04487080).5 MARIPOSA compared the EGFR/MET bispecific antibody amivantamab-vmjw (Rybrevant) plus the EGFR TKI lazertinib (Lazcluze) with lazertinib or osimertinib monotherapy in patients with treatment-naive EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

    At a median follow-up of 37.8 months, data from the final OS analysis of MARIPOSA presented during ELCC demonstrated that patients who received amivantamab plus lazertinib (n = 429) achieved a median OS that was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 42.9-NR) compared with 36.7 months (95% CI, 33.4-41.0) among patients who received osimertinib (n = 429; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; P < .005). The 42-month OS rates were 56% and 44%, respectively. Additionally, the median intracranial PFS was 25.4 months (95% CI, 20.1-29.5) vs 22.2 months (95% CI, 18.4-26.9), respectively (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61-1.02; P = .07).

    Prior findings from MARIPOSA supported the August 2024 FDA approval of lazertinib plus amivantamab for the frontline treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations.6

    “The [MARIPOSA] regimen makes sense for patients who want to maximize their antitumor benefit [and who] understand the toxicities, particularly gastrointestinal and skin toxicities, that could develop with the use of this therapeutic combination, as well as the amount of time that coming into the infusion center takes vs taking a pill,” Patel said. “It’s an important discussion to have with our patients around what I consider the 3 frontline regimens, which are the standards of care [SOC]: amivantamab plus lazertinib; chemotherapy plus osimertinib; or osimertinib alone. [Osimertinib monotherapy] is for patients who want to maximize quality of life with an oral-only regimen. These 3 [options] represent the SOC, with amivantamab plus lazertinib having an OS benefit at the cost of [increased] toxicity.”

    Investigators Gather at ILCC to Further Discuss Combination Approaches and More

    Patel cochaired the 26th Annual International Lung Cancer Congress® (ILCC) hosted by Physicians’ Education Resource®, LLC, with Roy S. Herbst, MD, PhD, and Heather A. Wakelee, MD, FASCO, at the end of July. Investigators from across the field of lung cancer convened to further discuss the development of combination approaches in the space.7

    In advance of the event, Patel said he expected to see “a continued emphasis on the appropriate use of precision therapeutics in the correct setting, meaning those patients with EGFR mutations get EGFR-directed therapy and those patients with KRAS mutations will often get immunotherapy up front. [We are] thinking about how we can best use immunologic approaches in the curative-intent setting and increasing the number of patients with the opportunity to receive neoadjuvant or perioperative chemoimmunotherapy to maximize our cure rates for these patients, which fundamentally requires us to improve our low-dose CT screening rates for former smokers or those who’ve recently quit.”

    References

    1. FDA approves osimertinib for locally advanced, unresectable (stage III) non-small cell lung cancer following chemoradiation therapy. FDA. September 25, 2024. Accessed April 17, 2025. bit.ly/3RTKZQF
    2. Ramalingam SS, Ozguroglu M, Ahn MJ, et al. Osimertinib (osi) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients (pts) with unresectable (UR) stage III EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-
      small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated overall survival (OS) analysis from the LAURA study. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20(suppl 1):S123-S124. doi:10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00379-X
    3. Le X, Hendriks L, Morabito A, et al. Osimertinib (osi)+ datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in patients (pts) with EGFR- mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) whose disease progressed on first-line (1L) osi: ORCHARD. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20(suppl 1):S2-S4. doi:10.1016/S1556-0864(25)00196-0
    4. Three phase 3 trials of datopotamab deruxtecan-based combinations initiated in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. News release. Daiichi-Sankyo. October 30, 2024. Accessed April 21, 2025. bit.ly/3GkKzQX
    5. Yang JCH, Kim YJ, Lee SH, et al. Amivantamab plus lazertinib vs osimertinib in first-line (1L) EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC: final overall survival (OS) from the phase III MARIPOSA study. J Thorac Oncol. 2025;20(suppl 1):S6-S8. doi:10.1016/ S1556-0864(25)00199-6
    6. FDA approves lazertinib with amivantamab-vmjw for non-small lung cancer. FDA. Updated August 20, 2024. Accessed April 21, 2025. bit.ly/3Y5PP0P
    7. 26th Annual International Lung Cancer Congress. Physicians’ Education Resource LLC. Accessed April 17, 2025. bit.ly/4lC4H14

    Continue Reading

  • Results of the Stellantis 2025 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

    Results of the Stellantis 2025 Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

    AMSTERDAM – Stellantis N.V. (“Stellantis”) announced today that shareholders approved the appointment of Antonio Filosa as a member of the Board of Directors and an executive director of Stellantis at the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM).

    Details of the resolution submitted to the EGM are available on the Company’s corporate website (www.stellantis.com).

     

     

    About Stellantis

    Stellantis N.V. (NYSE: STLA / Euronext Milan: STLAM / Euronext Paris: STLAP) is a leading global automaker, dedicated to giving its customers the freedom to choose the way they move, embracing the latest technologies and creating value for all its stakeholders. Its unique portfolio of iconic and innovative brands includes Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, DS Automobiles, FIAT, Jeep®, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram, Vauxhall, Free2move and Leasys. For more information, visit www.stellantis.com. 

     

     

    Continue Reading

  • How do penguins navigate the ocean? Secret strategy revealed

    How do penguins navigate the ocean? Secret strategy revealed

    The ocean is vast, wild, and constantly in motion. For animals that rely on it to survive, every trip is a test. Some animals fly, others swim, but all must find their way through a landscape that changes every hour.

    For Magellanic penguins, the challenge is especially tough. These flightless birds must leave the safety of their nests, dive into unpredictable waters, and forage far from land – all while ensuring they return in time to feed their chicks.


    Without visual landmarks or a clear view of the coast, the journey becomes more than a physical effort. It becomes a navigation puzzle. A new study reveals how these penguins do it.

    Led by Richard Michael Gunner from Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, the study shows that Magellanic penguins are not just strong swimmers. They are clever navigators, capable of adjusting their movement in response to ocean currents to travel efficiently and even hunt along the way.

    Penguins adjust to ocean currents

    The study tracked 27 adult penguins during a single foraging trip in Argentina’s San Matías Gulf. Scientists fitted each bird with GPS and motion sensors.

    These loggers captured heading, speed, dive depth, and prey-catching attempts. The goal was to see how penguins deal with drifting forces without visible land cues.

    The researchers discovered that penguins switch strategies based on current strength. When waters were calm, penguins swam in straight lines home.

    In stronger flows, they followed the currents, even if it meant drifting sideways. This made their path longer but saved energy.

    Penguins drift to save energy

    Penguins didn’t always choose the shortest route. Instead, they allowed the currents to carry them sideways and then corrected course as currents shifted. This created S-shaped return paths.

    These movements were not random. They reduced energy costs by taking advantage of tidal reversals in the 12-hour cycle.

    “Our results indicate that penguins notice discrepancies between their intended path and actual displacement over ground, then adjust accordingly,” noted the researchers.

    “While penguins still aim broadly toward the colony under strong currents, they exhibit a more dispersed heading distribution, potentially reflecting repeated or fine-scale corrections to compensate for the drift. Such behavior is consistent with effective navigation even when out of sight of land.”

    Penguins forage on the way home

    Rather than swimming straight home, penguins adjusted their path to conserve energy and hunt. Many dove over 10 meters deep during their return.

    The penguins caught prey up to 80% of the way back. As they got closer to land, dive depths reduced, and travel paths became more direct.

    “Magellanic penguins finding their way back to their nests from the open ocean subtly adjust their headings to exploit tidal currents, following paths that reduce energy costs while maintaining remarkable accuracy,” wrote the authors of the study.

    “Rather than swimming directly home, they drift laterally with the tides, balancing travel efficiency with opportunistic foraging along the way.”

    Penguins stay on course

    The study used advanced modeling to compare real and simulated paths. If penguins followed a fixed heading, they would often miss the colony by several kilometers.

    Real penguins did better. Their deviations were shaped by current strength, prey activity, and dive behavior. The researchers found that current-aligned swimming boosted speed without adding energy cost.

    These findings suggest penguins might not detect currents directly. Instead, they may sense how far they have been displaced from their compass-based heading and make adjustments. This could involve mechanosensing or even smell, though the exact cues remain unclear.

    Incredible accuracy over long distances

    Despite navigating rough waters, 85% of Magellanic penguins returned within 984 feet of their departure point. That translates to 99.4% accuracy over a 31-mile journey.

    Even those returning at night reached their nests with similar precision, proving that visual cues are not required for successful navigation.

    Scientists believe these penguins may rely on a mix of non-visual tools. Possible mechanisms include detecting magnetic fields, using their sense of smell, or sensing low-frequency sounds like infrasound.

    This remarkable ability highlights the penguins’ capacity to orient themselves in the open ocean, even when completely out of sight of their colony.

    How penguins handle ocean currents

    The study shows how animals can respond to unpredictable environments with smart, energy-saving strategies.

    By combining direction sensing with dynamic drift usage, Magellanic penguins show a flexible approach that supports both travel and foraging. These insights may apply to other marine species, especially those navigating far from land.

    Future research may uncover how these penguins detect and respond to water movement. Until then, their ocean journeys remain a stunning example of natural precision and adaptability.

    The study is published in the journal PLOS Biology.

    —–

    Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

    Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

    —–


    Continue Reading

  • What the GENIUS Act Means for Payment Stablecoin Issuers, Banks, and Custodians

    What the GENIUS Act Means for Payment Stablecoin Issuers, Banks, and Custodians

     

    I. Overview

    The US House of Representatives has passed stablecoin legislation as part of “Crypto Week” on Capitol Hill. S. 1582, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS or the Act), passed the US Senate in June and passed the US House of Representatives yesterday (July 17). The bill is expected to be signed into law as early as today (July 18), as the White House has been urging Congress to deliver both GENIUS and the crypto market structure legislation (the CLARITY Act) before the August recess.

    GENIUS establishes a clear regulatory framework for the issuance of “payment stablecoins”—digital assets backed by low-risk reserves like cash or Treasuries and designed to maintain a fixed value attached to a national currency, such as the US dollar. Unlike crypto assets that may have speculative value, payment stablecoins are designed to serve as a convenient and cost-effective payment method. This is particularly true for cross-border payments, where payment stablecoins typically have lower transaction fees than do traditional bank transfers. Despite their growing use in the United States, these products have operated with little, if any, direct federal oversight. GENIUS addresses this gap by seeking to prioritize consumer protection, encourage responsible innovation and reinforce the US dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency.

    II. Motivating Policy Concerns

    GENIUS aims to address key concerns regarding who may issue stablecoins into the growing stablecoin market:

    • Financial stability: The Act addresses financial stability risks by requiring, among other things, that stablecoins be backed by high-quality assets. This set of requirements addresses the concern that, if a stablecoin were backed by risky assets, a loss of confidence could trigger a wave of redemptions (similar to a bank run), potentially leading to a fire sale of reserves and broader market disruption. Critics of the GENIUS today, though, have expressed concern that if a large portion of stablecoin reserves is held in Treasuries, rapid redemptions could force issuers to sell those Treasuries quickly, putting downward pressure on prices and disrupting the Treasury market. To mitigate this risk, GENIUS requires payment stablecoin issuers to hold high-quality reserve assets, safeguard them with qualified custodians, provide monthly reserve disclosures and publish redemption policies. The Act also includes bankruptcy provisions to ensure stablecoin holders have priority claims on reserve assets.
    • Cross-border parity: GENIUS also seeks to ensure that foreign issuers are subject to the same rules as US issuers for preventing money laundering, terrorist financing and sanctions violations if they issue stablecoins “in the United States.” Without such requirements, US issuers would have remained at a disadvantage, because they must comply with obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and the Treasury Department’s sanctions regulations, while foreign permitted stablecoin issuers could have accessed US markets without equivalent obligations. The Act includes anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance provisions that require foreign issuers to meet AML and sanctions compliance requirements before issuing payment stablecoins to holders in the United States.
    • Regulatory clarity: GENIUS establishes a coherent framework for the stablecoin market in the United States to facilitate enhanced adoption of digital assets and the growth of the digital asset ecosystem. This framework also aims to attract stablecoin activity to the United States and increase demand for Treasuries by providing clear rules that will make payment stablecoins from US issuers more attractive in the global marketplace and by restricting the use of foreign entity-issued stablecoins in the US market unless they are regulated by a comparable regime.

    III. Key Provisions of GENIUS

    A. Timing 

    GENIUS will take effect either 18 months after its passage or 120 days after final regulations are issued—whichever comes first. Regulations implementing the Act must be issued within one year of enactment.

    B. Scope and Function

    GENIUS prohibits the issuance of payment stablecoins in the United States except by an approved US-based “permitted payment stablecoin issuer” regulated under GENIUS or a registered foreign issuer operating under a comparable regulatory regime and supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Permitted payment stablecoin issuers are US entities authorized under the Act, which are (1) approved bank subsidiaries, (2) federally approved nonbanks (pursuant to a new process established by the statute) or OCC-chartered uninsured banks or federal branches, or state-chartered issuers approved by state regulators. The Act also controls which payment stablecoins are eligible for secondary market trading in the United States: After three years, unauthorized stablecoins generally may not be offered or sold in the United States by digital asset service providers (digital asset custodians, exchanges, etc.). 

    These restrictions are intended to ensure that the US stablecoin market will consist of issuers operating under US state and federal supervision and contributing to the US economy through tax obligations and the generation of demand for US Treasuries, and to ensure that US-licensed issuers are not put at a competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis foreign competitors. GENIUS allows for limited exceptions, which are established by the Treasury Secretary and are only applicable to very low or de minimis transaction volumes or in unusual or emergency circumstances.

    C. State and Federal Regulatory Pathways

    Under GENIUS, permitted issuers may be regulated either at the federal level or under a state regime determined to be substantially similar to the federal framework by federal regulators on the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee. This approach aims to balance state-level flexibility with federal oversight while preventing issuers from engaging in regulatory arbitrage to avoid federal standards that may be perceived as stricter.

    Certain issuers are excluded from state regulation: insured depository institutions, OCC-chartered uninsured national banks, federal branches, and large state-qualified issuers with more than $10 billion in outstanding stablecoin issuance, all of which must be regulated under the federal regulatory regime.

    For issuers that qualify for state-level oversight, the state payment stablecoin regulator holds primary supervisory, examination and enforcement authority. Federal regulators may intervene in exceptional cases if they determine that the state regulator has failed to act. State regulators may also choose to collaborate with federal regulators under memoranda of understanding, even outside of exigent circumstances. The Act also establishes standards for state-regulated issuers to operate in other states.

    D. Becoming a Permitted Issuer 

    To become a permitted payment stablecoin issuer, an entity must apply to its state or federal regulator, as applicable. Foreign issuers may also register to issue payment stablecoins in the United States if they are regulated under a foreign regime deemed comparable to the US framework by the Treasury Secretary. Applicants are designated as “state qualified payment stablecoin issuers,” “federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers” or “foreign payment stablecoin issuers,” depending on the regime under which they were originally approved. This can differ from the regime under which they are primarily regulated; for example, a large state qualified payment stablecoin issuer with more than $10 billion in outstanding payment stablecoin issuance must be regulated under the federal regulatory regime, despite being originally licensed by a state regulator.

    State vs. Federal Qualification Processes 

    Entities that apply to be state qualified payment stablecoin issuers must apply to a state regulator that has been approved by the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee as having requirements that are substantially similar to those of the federal system.

    To become a federal qualified issuer, an entity must follow procedures laid out in GENIUS. The process begins with the applicant identifying its primary federal regulator and submitting an application. The regulator then has 120 days to decide whether to grant the application. An application may be denied only if the applicant’s activities are deemed unsafe or unsound, based on certain factors, such as the issuer’s leadership team, redemption policy and ability to comply with GENIUS requirements. Denials must include a regulator’s written explanation and specific recommendations to improve the application for resubmission. If the regulator fails to render a decision on a complete application within 120 days, the application is automatically approved.

    Restriction on Nonfinancial Issuers

    Another important restriction applies to issuers that are foreign or public companies not primarily engaged in financial activities. Unless they receive unanimous approval from the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee, such nonfinancial companies are generally ineligible to become permitted issuers. In order for the committee to approve a nonfinancial company to issue payment stablecoins, it must consider heightened standards compared to those applied to other applicants.

    This restriction reflects a historic concern about the separation of banking and commerce, which has taken new shape in the digital age. Some concerns with a nonfinancial (i.e., commercial) company entering the financial space are the potential disruption to the nonfinancial activities of the “real economy” and the fear that nonfinancial companies with captive stablecoin issuers may be able to give themselves preferential access to payment services. Because financial markets are vulnerable to disruption, regulators have also long sought to protect the broader economy by prohibiting certain financial and nonfinancial activities from occurring within the same company. (For example, should a bank fail due to a disruption in financial markets, it is preferable that the bank is not simultaneously operating an airline or a hospital.) In our increasingly data-driven economy, there is an additional concern that large commercial companies undertaking financial activities may have an unfair advantage over financial companies due to superior access to consumer data.

    Treatment of Foreign Issuers 

    While foreign issuers that are not licensed in the United States as permitted issuers would ordinarily be prohibited from issuing payment stablecoins or having them traded in the United States, an exception applies for those regulated under foreign regimes deemed comparable to the Act’s framework. The Treasury Secretary, with the approval of all Stablecoin Certification Review Committee members, may designate a foreign regime as sufficiently comparable to the US framework. Foreign issuers under such regimes may issue payment stablecoins in the United States provided that they (1) register with the OCC and consent to reporting, supervision, examination and enforcement required by US regulators; (2) hold reserve assets in US financial institutions sufficient to satisfy any redemption requests from any US payment stablecoin holders; and (3) are not domiciled in jurisdictions that have been determined to be of primary money laundering concern or are subject to an embargo. The OCC will issue additional regulations applicable to these foreign issuers regulated by comparable foreign regimes that register to do business in the United States.

    To facilitate technological interoperability with comparable foreign stablecoin regimes, GENIUS directs federal regulators to collaborate with state governments and technology-standards organizations, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

    E. Requirements for Permitted Issuers

    In order to maintain their status and ability to issue stablecoins, permitted issuers must comply with several requirements: They must maintain high-quality reserve assets, meet their disclosure obligations, and comply with sanctions and AML regulations.

    Reserve Assets

    Permitted issuers must maintain reserves of certain high-quality, liquid assets backing their outstanding payment stablecoins on a 1:1 basis. This stringent requirement helps ensure payment stablecoins are trusted as a method of payment and can be issued in large volume without creating undue risks to payment stablecoin holders or financial stability.

    The approved reserve assets include US currency, deposits at insured depository institutions, short-term Treasuries and overnight short-term Treasury repurchase (“repo”) agreements (or overnight reverse repo agreements in Treasuries, provided that they are tri-party, use a clearing agency or are with a highly creditworthy counterparty). Permitted issuers may also hold as reserve assets any other similarly liquid asset issued by the federal government and approved by their primary federal payment stablecoin regulator, shares in money market funds invested solely in approved reserve assets, or a tokenized version of any of the above except repo and reverse repo agreements. Reserves generally may not be pledged, rehypothecated or reused by issuers.

    Finally, permitted issuers are required to publish on a monthly basis on their websites information about the makeup of their reserves, including the total number of outstanding payment stablecoins issued.

    Disclosure Obligations

    Permitted issuers must disclose their redemption policies, and an issuer’s CEO and CFO must disclose and personally certify a monthly report on the composition of the issuer’s reserve asset holdings. The permitted issuer must also hire an independent public accountant to examine each monthly report before submitting the following month’s report.

    Issuers with more than $50 billion in outstanding payment stablecoin issuance must annually publish on their websites and submit to their primary federal payment stablecoin regulators audited financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Issuers already publishing annual financial statements as public companies (i.e., filing a 10-K) are exempt from this requirement.

    AML and Sanctions Compliance

    Permitted issuers are subject to the BSA and must comply with requests by their primary regulator for information about their compliance efforts. Foreign issuers must comply with certain lawful US orders, and the Treasury Secretary may publicly designate noncompliant foreign issuers. Moreover, digital asset service providers are prohibited from facilitating transactions in stablecoins from foreign issuers unless such issuers have the technological ability to comply and do comply with such sanctions orders. Foreign issuers can never be eligible to have their payment stablecoins traded in the United States if located in a country of primary money laundering concern or that is subject to comprehensive sanctions.

    F. Restrictions on Permitted Issuers

    In addition to their affirmative obligations, permitted issuers face certain limitations on their conduct, including:

    • Limitations on Stablecoin Activities: Permitted issuers are only allowed to (1) issue, redeem and custody payment stablecoins; (2) manage, custody and secure payment stablecoin reserves; or (3) undertake activities to directly support the above activities.
    • Prohibitions on Tying: Permitted issuers are prohibited from requiring customers to purchase other products/services offered by the issuer (or to not use services from a competitor) as a condition of using their services.
    • FDIC Coverage: Stablecoins are not backed by federal deposit insurance or subject to share insurance by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). Permitted issuers may not represent that stablecoins are backed by the federal government or federal deposit insurance.
    • Yield: Permitted issuers are prohibited from offering payments of interest or yield to holders of payment stablecoins solely in connection with their holding of such payment stablecoins.

    G. Additional Protections for Stablecoin Holders 

    Although in large part GENIUS defers to the CLARITY Act on the rules applicable to non-issuers, there are some specific GENIUS rules designed to protect payment stablecoin holders, including:

    • Custody: Entities may only engage in custodial and safekeeping services for stablecoin reserves if they are subject to supervision by a primary federal payment stablecoin regulator, a primary financial regulatory agency or certain state supervisors. Custodians are prohibited from commingling customer assets and stablecoin reserves. This provision excludes entities that provide hardware or software to facilitate a customer’s own custody of stablecoins or private keys.
    • Custody by Banking Institutions: The Act confirms it shall not be construed as limiting the authority of banks to engage in a range of activities, including providing custodial services for payment stablecoins. Additionally, regulators may not require banks to hold additional regulatory capital for engaging in custodial activities except specifically to mitigate risks inherent in such custody.
    • Bankruptcy Protections: Payment stablecoin holders will receive preferential treatment in bankruptcy with respect to the reserves, meaning first priority as to all other claims against an issuer up to the value of the reserves required under GENIUS. The Act also requires a study on the treatment of payment stablecoin issuers in bankruptcy.

    H. Allocation of Regulatory Authority 

    Each issuer is assigned a primary federal payment stablecoin regulator depending on the type of entity: Subsidiaries of insured depository institutions are assigned the appropriate federal banking agency (the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the OCC or the Federal Reserve); subsidiaries of insured credit unions are assigned the NCUA; other state-chartered depository institutions are assigned the FDIC, the OCC or the Federal Reserve; and federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers are assigned the OCC.

    Each primary federal payment stablecoin regulator may take suspension, prohibition, cease-and-desist and civil money penalty actions against the issuers it regulates and their institution-affiliated parties (such as directors and officers).

    I. Rulemaking and Reports to Congress 

    Permitted issuers will also be required to conform with additional requirements to be issued within one year by the coordinated rulemaking efforts of the Treasury Secretary, each primary federal payment stablecoin regulator and each state regulator. These regulations are to include regulatory capital requirements tailored to the risks associated with payment stablecoins, liquidity and risk management practices for reserves and operational requirements for cybersecurity and sanctions compliance. Regulators must also report to Congress on GENIUS’ implementing regulations within 180 days of the Act becoming effective, and the Treasury Secretary must provide a report on non-payment stablecoins within one year of enactment in collaboration with the Federal Reserve, the OCC, the FDIC, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

    The primary federal payment stablecoin regulators will also consult with state regulators to create annual reports on the payment stablecoin industry for publication in Financial Stability Oversight Council’s annual report, beginning one year from GENIUS’ enactment date.

    IV. Other Crypto Week Legislation: The CLARITY Act

    GENIUS focuses narrowly on the issuance of payment stablecoins and the regulation of their issuers. The CLARITY Act, which the House passed alongside GENIUS, addresses the market structure for the listing and trading of digital assets, including the roles of intermediaries and trading platforms, and provides both the SEC and CFTC with regulatory jurisdiction over certain entities, products, and activities.

    V. Conclusion

    GENIUS provides long-awaited regulatory guidance for the issuance and custody of payment stablecoins and creates a structured path for issuers, banks and custodians to participate in this rapidly growing market. For issuers, depository institutions and custodians, GENIUS presents a timely opportunity to take a leading position in the growing stablecoin market by acting early to meet compliance and operational requirements.

    Issuers should assess whether federal or state qualification best aligns with their structure and commercial objectives and begin preparing internal systems to meet GENIUS’ standards for reserve management, disclosures and compliance. Banks are now better positioned to expand into custody and tokenization services, as the Act removes key regulatory hurdles and supports blockchain integration into traditional infrastructure. Custodians, facing new supervisory and operational expectations, should proactively review custody arrangements, segregation protocols and reporting practices. Although it is not the final step in developing a comprehensive digital asset regulatory system, GENIUS plays a foundational role in establishing a coherent legal framework that promotes consumer protection, responsible innovation and the continued strength of the US dollar in the global financial system.1

    Exhibit A: Key Definitions in the GENIUS Act

    Term Description
    Appropriate Federal Banking Agency The primary federal agency responsible for overseeing banks, as defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813). This means the OCC for any national banking association, any federal branch or agency of a foreign bank, and any federal savings association; the FDIC for any state nonmember-insured bank, any foreign bank having an insured branch, and any state savings association; and the Federal Reserve for any state member bank, foreign bank branches/agencies, uninsured foreign banks, nonfederal lending agencies, IB Act supervisory proceedings, and non-depository bank or savings and loan holding companies.
    Banking Secrecy Act The law that creates AML program obligations for financial institutions (31 U.S.C. 5311 et seq.).
    Digital Asset Service Provider Any business in the United States exchanging, transferring or providing custodial services for digital assets, or providing financial services related to digital assets issuance. Engagement with distributed ledger protocols, self-custodial software interfaces, validators and decentralized liquidity pools does not fall within the definition.
    Federal Qualified Payment Stablecoin Issuer An entity approved to issue payment stablecoins by the OCC under Section 5 of GENIUS. This may include (1) a nonbank entity that is not state qualified, (2) an OCC-chartered or -approved uninsured national bank, and (3) a federal branch approved by the OCC.
    Payment Stablecoin A type of digital asset designed to be redeemed for a fixed amount of monetary value relative to a fixed benchmark. The definition excludes digital national currencies, deposits (including tokenized deposits) and securities. GENIUS requires all entities issuing payment stablecoins to US persons to apply to be “permitted payment stablecoin issuers” or to otherwise consent to regulation under GENIUS; the CLARITY Act then refers to payment stablecoins from those approved issuers as “permitted payment stablecoins.”
    Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer A US-formed entity authorized to issue payment stablecoins under this Act, which is (1) an approved subsidiary of an insured depository institution, (2) a federally approved nonbank entity or OCC-chartered or -approved uninsured national bank or federal branch, or (3) a state-chartered issuer authorized by a state payment stablecoin regulator.
    Primary Federal Payment Stablecoin Regulator A federal regulatory authority assigned to each permitted payment stablecoin issuer depending on the issuer’s entity type: for subsidiaries of insured depository institutions, the appropriate federal banking agency under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; for insured credit unions and their subsidiaries, the NCUA; for other state-chartered depository institutions, the FDIC, the OCC or the Fed; and for federal qualified payment stablecoin issuers, the OCC.
    Stablecoin Certification Review Committee The committee that certifies state regulatory regimes as substantially similar to the federal regulatory framework, approves nonfinancial companies as issuers and approves comparable foreign regulatory regimes for foreign issuer eligibility. It consists of the Treasury Secretary, the FDIC Chair and the Federal Reserve Chair (who may delegate to the Vice Chair for Supervision).

    Continue Reading

  • Quercetin: A Natural Ally in Combating Breast Cancer

    Quercetin: A Natural Ally in Combating Breast Cancer

    Introduction

    Breast cancer, as one of the most common malignant tumors in women, accounts for approximately 2.3 million new cases globally each year, ranking at the forefront of the incidence and mortality spectrum of female cancers.1 Its development is influenced by a combination of multiple factors, including age, reproductive risks, exposure to exogenous hormones, lifestyle, and histological abnormalities of the breast tissue.2 Based on the expression patterns of hormone receptors (ER/PR/HER2), breast cancer can be classified into molecular subtypes such as luminal type, HER2 overexpression type, and basal-like type.3 The basal-like type mainly includes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), which is characterized by strong invasiveness, high rates of metastasis and recurrence, and a significantly worse prognosis compared to other subtypes.4 TNBC exhibits no responsiveness to HER2-directed therapies, which further restricts the range of treatment options available.5

    Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has demonstrated potential for multitarget regulation in the treatment of breast cancer. Its active components can exert antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and modulating pathways related to metastasis, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis.6 For example, studies have shown that TCM can inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of renal tubular cells through the NF-κB/Snail signaling pathway.7 Additionally, TCM has been found to modulate the immune microenvironment and inhibit key oncogenic signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt and Wnt/β-catenin, which are crucial for tumor progression.8 Furthermore, TCM can enhance the sensitivity of chemotherapeutic drugs, thereby improving treatment efficacy.9 This multitarget and synergistic mechanism provides a novel therapeutic strategy for the intervention of breast cancer, especially for hormone receptor-negative or drug-resistant subtypes.10

    Quercetin, a representative flavonoid belonging to the class of natural polyphenolic compounds, is well-documented for its broad-spectrum health benefits, including anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, and antiviral effects.11 Notably, quercetin—a prominent flavonoid—has garnered significant attention for its potential role in inhibiting breast cancer progression through diverse mechanisms,12 including inducing cancer cell apoptosis, blocking metastasis by suppressing EMT processes and stem-like properties, overcoming drug resistance, targeting critical pathways like EGFR, IGF1R, and HuR protein, and synergizing with therapies through oxidative stress modulation and immune response enhancement.

    Quercetin—History and Medicinal Use

    Recently, research on plant-derived flavonoid compounds, particularly quercetin, has surged. Quercetin, a representative flavonoid, is abundantly found in common vegetables and fruits (Figure 1). Owing to its diverse biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunoprotective, anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, antiviral, antibacterial and neuroprotective properties (Figure 2), quercetin has been widely used as a dietary supplement to treat or prevent a variety of diseases.13 For antioxidant activity, Xu et al (2019) demonstrated that quercetin and its complexes exhibit significant antioxidant potential suitable for medicinal applications.14 Regarding anti-inflammatory effects, Lesjak et al (2018) highlighted the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives.15 For immunoprotective activity, Saeedi-Boroujeni et al (2021) emphasized the anti-inflammatory potential of quercetin in COVID-19 treatment.16 For anti-diabetic activity, Hassanien et al (2020) reported the antidiabetic activity of a cobalt–quercetin complex.17 Regarding antiviral activity, Luo et al (2025) discussed the role of quercetin in reducing neuroinflammation by inhibiting central inflammatory pathways.18

    Figure 1 The sources of quercetin, including apples, onions (specifically red onions), citrus fruits (such as oranges, grapefruits, lemons), berries (such as strawberries, blueberries, raspberries), leafy green vegetables (such as spinach, kale, collard greens), legumes (such as lentils, green beans), cherries (especially dark-colored cherries), tomatoes, etc. lmage created with BioRender.com,with permission.

    Figure 2 The biological function of quercetin, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunoprotective, anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, antiviral, antibacterial and neuroprotective properties. lmage created with BioRender.com,with permission.

    Quercetin has demonstrated potential in preventing chronic metabolic disorders like diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by regulating glucose homeostasis, reducing oxidative stress, and mitigating insulin resistance.19 Recent studies also highlight its role in cancer therapy, where quercetin suppresses tumor progression by modulating pathways linked to cell proliferation and apoptosis. Notably, quercetin inhibits CYP3A4 activity, a key enzyme involved in breast cancer advancement, thereby slowing disease progression.20 Quercetin is capable of upregulating the expression of genes such as AKT1, MAPK1, PGR, SGK1 and PTEN, while downregulating the expression of ESR1 and MAPK3. These genes are expressed in various tissues, with AKT1 and MAPK1 being widely expressed in both normal and cancerous tissues, including breast, prostate, and colorectal tissues. PGR (progesterone receptor) is predominantly found in reproductive tissues such as the uterus and breast. ESR1 (estrogen receptor) is highly expressed in breast and ovarian tissues. SGK1 is expressed in a variety of tissues, including the kidney, lung, and heart. The selective action of quercetin against cancer cells, with minimal effects on normal cells, has been documented in several studies. For instance, quercetin has been shown to selectively induce apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by downregulating the expression of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), a protein that is often overexpressed in cancer cells and is crucial for their survival. Additionally, quercetin’s ability to modulate key signaling pathways contributes to its selective anticancer effects. This selective action is further supported by studies demonstrating that quercetin can arrest the cell cycle and induce apoptosis in cancer cells through the mitochondrial pathway, without significantly affecting normal cells.21 This suggests that quercetin may modulate multiple signaling pathways by targeting key molecules, thereby playing a role in the prevention and treatment of spontaneous abortion (SA). This regulatory effect highlights the potential significance of quercetin in influencing hormonal responses and anti-inflammatory reactions. Several studies have demonstrated that consuming vegetables, fruits, and black tea rich in quercetin can reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer.22–28 These studies highlight the potential of quercetin as a therapeutic agent by demonstrating its ability to inhibit these pathways and induce apoptosis in cancer cells. Furthermore, research has indicated that quercetin possesses the ability to curb the progression and spread of cancer by targeting various signaling pathways, as referenced in.29 This insight holds significant promise for the therapeutic management of a range of cancers, with particular relevance to the treatment of breast cancer.

    Despite its bioactive properties, quercetin’s clinical use is limited by several factors. Its poor bioavailability, due to low water solubility and extensive metabolism, results in low systemic availability and rapid clearance from the body.30 Standardized dosing guidelines are lacking, complicating its clinical application.31 Quercetin can also interact with medications, potentially altering their efficacy and safety.32 Long-term safety concerns and complex pharmacological actions further limit its use.33 Future research should focus on improving bioavailability and establishing standardized dosing and safety profiles.

    Quercetin’s poor water solubility restricts its direct application, leading to the development of solubility-enhanced formulations and derivatives. For example, Quercitrin 2”-O-arabinoside (Yunnan Xili Biotechnology Co., Ltd., product code 7484288) and quercetin-3-β-D-glucoside (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology, CAS: 482–35-9) are glycosylated derivatives with improved solubility and stability, suitable for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical research. Advanced delivery systems, such as quercetin-loaded glycerohyalurosome hydrogel (QUT-GHE-GEL) and cyclodextrin-based complexes (eg, quercetin/6-O-α-D-maltosyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes from Xi’an Qiyue Bio), enhance solubility and enable controlled release.34 Natural extracts, like the Melia azedarach L. leaf extract containing quercetin-3-O-D-glucopyranoside and quercetin-3-O-(2″,6″-digalloyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside, are also utilized for their immunomodulatory effects.35 These examples demonstrate how structural modifications (eg, glycosylation, esterification) and advanced delivery systems address quercetin’s solubility limitations.

    Quercetin’s intrinsic fluorescence and chromogenic properties can significantly interfere with spectroscopic assays, potentially leading to false-positive signals in anticancer screening due to its nonspecific interactions with proteins. Alva-Ensastegui et al classify quercetin as a PAIN (pan-assay interference compound), characterized by its propensity to disrupt membrane dipole potential and generate assay artifacts through protein binding.36 Structural modifications such as C-glucosylation have demonstrated efficacy in mitigating these PAIN-related behaviors by reducing membrane interference.37 These findings underscore the necessity for implementing countermeasures, such as compound derivatization coupled with orthogonal assay validation, during pharmacological evaluations involving quercetin.

    The Role of Quercetin in Tumor Chemotherapy

    Quercetin, a natural product with multiple biological functions such as anti-inflammation, antioxidation, and anti-cancer, has shown anti-cancer activity against various systemic tumors. Current research indicates that quercetin has demonstrated anti-cancer potential in both in vitro and in vivo studies of various animal models and cell lines, and it selectively targets cancer cells with toxic effects, while sparing normal cells from significant toxicity (Table 1).38

    Table 1 Characteristics of Studies About the Anticancer Effect of Quercetin

    Quercetin has been recognized for its potent anticancer capabilities in a spectrum of cancers. It exhibits its tumor-inhibiting effects in breast, colorectal, and liver cancers by modulating the intricate protein networks that are pivotal to the onset and progression of these diseases.39 In the realm of oncology, quercetin has demonstrated significant therapeutic promise, particularly in the treatment of cancers of the blood, lung, and prostate. This is underscored by its capacity to manipulate various molecular factors that regulate key signaling pathways, as demonstrated in both experimental models in vitro and in vivo. Specifically, quercetin has been shown to impact the PI3K/Akt/mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, and MAPK/ERK1 pathways, which are central to the progression of these malignancies.40

    In vitro models and in vivo models, quercetin has shown antitumor activity against breast cancer cells, including inhibiting the cell cycle, promoting apoptosis, and reducing tumor volume.41 In the context of cellular apoptosis mechanisms, quercetin displays its influence by reducing the expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and simultaneously increasing that of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax. Furthermore, in vitro studies have illustrated quercetin’s capacity to inhibit the activity of stem cells associated with breast cancer. Additionally, in vivo research has confirmed quercetin’s potential to limit both the spread and growth of tumors, thereby underscoring its therapeutic relevance in oncology. In terms of inhibiting proliferation, quercetin achieves dose-dependent apoptosis by increasing DNA apoptotic subsets in the G0/G1 phase and decreasing the S-phase subsets.42 Moreover, the compound quercetin has proven effective in managing breast cancer cell proliferation and in triggering apoptosis by modulating critical signaling cascades, including NF-κB, PI3K-AKT, MAPK, and mTOR, which are pivotal in the disease’s progression.35 In the TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231, quercetin exerts a suppressive effect on cell proliferation by increasing the number of cells in the S and G2/M phases while simultaneously reducing the number in the G0/G1 phase.43

    For osteosarcoma, quercetin impacts the proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and chemoresistance of osteosarcoma cells by modulating protein expression and signaling pathways.44 In the setting of liver cancer, quercetin induces apoptosis in liver cancer cells through the upregulation of apoptotic markers like Bax, caspase-3, and p21, while concurrently downregulating the expression of anti-apoptotic and cell cycle-progression proteins such as Akt, PLK-1, cyclin B1, cyclin A, CDC2, CDK2, and Bcl-2.45 In the treatment of ovarian cancer, quercetin exerts its potential therapeutic effects by targeting various molecular and cellular signaling pathways, including VEGF, MMPs, caspases, AKT, and KRAS.39 For prostate cancer, quercetin can inhibit cell cycle transition and induce apoptosis in tumor cells. It affects prostate cancer cells by dissociating Bcl-xL and activating the caspase family, showing a specific cytotoxic effect on cancer cells.46

    For colorectal cancer (CRC), quercetin shows positive effects on CRC cells in in vitro studies, including inducing cell apoptosis and reducing tumor size.47 Moreover, research has demonstrated that quercetin exerts its anti-tumor effects by targeting and modulating key signaling transduction pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, MAPK/Erk, JNK, as well as p38, p53, and NF-κB, thereby showcasing its potential as an anti-neoplastic agent.48 Among the various pathways influenced by quercetin, this flavonoid has been demonstrated to downregulate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, representing a pivotal alteration in the development of colorectal cancer.47 Quercetin can also enhance the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs and reduce the side effects of chemotherapy, showing an auxiliary effect in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Specifically, quercetin can enhance the chemotherapy effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and reduce its side effects.48 Additionally, when quercetin is used in combination with 5-FU, it can significantly inhibit the growth of the colorectal cancer cell line COLO 320DM.49

    In the scenario of nicotine-induced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), quercetin demonstrates inhibitory actions on tumor cell migration and invasion, while simultaneously enhancing apoptosis and inducing cell cycle arrest. These salutary effects are postulated to originate from quercetin’s capacity to repress the JNK/NF-κB/Akt signaling cascade and regulate the expression profiles of pivotal proteins: it increases the expression levels of Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), cleaved caspase-3, cyclin B1, and p21/WAF1 proteins, while decreasing the expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2).50 Within the context of NSCLC therapy, quercetin manifests its therapeutic impact through its capabilities to combat tumorigenesis, curb inflammation, hinder cell proliferation, impede angiogenesis, and encourage apoptosis.50

    Mechanisms of Quercetin in Breast Cancer

    In recent years, the mechanisms by which quercetin treats breast cancer have been progressively elucidated, including but not limited to promoting apoptosis within cancer cells and curbing their proliferation to effectively suppress tumor growth; additionally, impeding the migration, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells to prevent the advancement and dissemination of tumors; the role of certain quercetin derivatives; and the prediction of quercetin’s targets and pathways of action, etc (Figure 3 and Table 2). Quercetin exhibits both conserved and context-dependent anticancer mechanisms. Although its core activities—such as antioxidant effects, apoptosis induction—are consistent with its effects on other cancer types (eg, breast, liver, colon), the specific molecular targets and pathways may vary depending on the tissue context. Further research is needed to fully understand the unique aspects of quercetin’s action in breast cancer and to optimize its therapeutic potential. By demystifying the complex molecular mechanisms of quercetin’s action, we can further explore its potential in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer.51

    Table 2 Quercetin Impact Upon Breast Cancer Models

    Figure 3 The mechanism of action of quercetin in breast cancer includes the regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway and the modulation of circHIAT1/miR19a3p/CADM2 axis. lmage created with BioRender.com,with permission.

    Mechanisms of Inducing Apoptosis and Inhibiting Proliferation

    Several mechanisms by which quercetin may prevent and treat cancer have been discovered. Quercetin enhances cancer cell apoptosis and autophagy while decreasing cell viability through modulation of signaling pathways.39 By interacting with its adenosine 5’-triphosphate (ATP) binding site, quercetin can effectively inhibit the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), exerting its inhibitory effects through a process that includes the formation of hydrogen bonds, π-π stacking, and hydrophobic interactions.50 Quercetin exerts regulatory effects on a variety of tumor-associated activities, such as oxidative stress, angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, tumor necrosis factor activity, proliferation, apoptosis, and metastasis.38 Quercetin exerts an anti-inflammatory effect and protects cells against oxidative stress by efficiently scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS), thus playing a crucial role in both cancer prevention and therapeutic management.47

    Studies have shown that in MCF7 cells containing quercetin, the expression of nuclear protein is significantly down-regulated 15.18 and 2.51 times (IC50= 160 μM) at 48 h and 72 h, respectively, which could potentially exert control over associated signaling pathways by adjusting the levels of nuclear protein expression in cancer cells, consequently impeding their proliferative capacity.52 Quercetin induces selective apoptosis in breast cancer cells through a dual-pathway mechanism involving epigenetic modulation and kinase network regulation. Firstly, it reactivates the tumor suppressor PTEN by reducing promoter DNA methylation, enabling its lipid phosphatase function to attenuate critical oncogenic signaling cascades which decreases AKT Ser473 phosphorylation and subsequently inhibits downstream anti-apoptotic effectors. Additionally, it coordinately disrupts mTOR complex functionality, simultaneously blocking mTORC1-mediated survival signals to activate pro-apoptotic protein translation while impairing mTORC2-dependent AKT activation. This orchestrated interference with both upstream epigenetic regulation and downstream kinase cascades establishes a synergistic therapeutic framework that concurrently targets proliferative signaling and apoptotic resistance in breast cancer pathogenesis.53,54 Furthermore, quercetin has the ability to suppress the IGF1/IGF1R signaling pathway. This chemical agent not only curbs the aggressive characteristics and the EMT linked to TNBC, but it also reduces the expression of EMT transcription factors Snail and Slug, preventing cancer cells from attaining stem-like characteristics.55

    Quercetin can also promote apoptosis. On one hand, quercetin boosts the expression levels of the transcription factor TFEB, which subsequently enhances the expression of the lysosome-associated gene LAMP1, and this cascade of events results in the degradation of ferritin and the liberation of iron ions, ultimately triggering ferroptosis.56 On the other hand, 4AcQ may induce apoptosis in MCF7 cells through a p53-dependent pathway.57

    Quercetin can also enhance the synergistic effects of immune cells. For instance, MDA-MB-231 cells treated with quercetin are capable of enhancing the cytotoxic effects of γδ T cells against breast cancer cells through the modulation of the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway.58 In clinical scenarios, quercetin exhibits the capability to address drug resistance in cancer cells, thereby augmenting the treatment of breast cancer. When combined with paclitaxel (PTX), quercetin can effectively and stably engage with vital targets within the EGFR/ERK signaling cascade. Furthermore, quercetin can suppress the proliferation of PTX-resistant breast cancer cells, induce cell apoptosis, and rejuvenate the responsiveness of PTX-resistant cells.59 Studies have also shown that quercetin reverses resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors by modulating the circHIAT1/miR19a3p/CADM2 axis.60

    Mechanisms That Inhibit Migration, Invasion and Metastasis

    Quercetin exerts a dual action on breast cancer cells by not only curbing their proliferation but also markedly inhibiting their invasiveness, playing a pivotal role in impeding the advancement of tumor metastasis.

    EMT is a key process for TNBC breast cancer cells to acquire aggressiveness, and studies have shown that quercetin can inhibit this process by regulating some signaling pathways. On the one hand, quercetin can target the circHIAT1/miR-19a-3p/CADM2 axis, and on the other hand, quercetin can inhibit the IGF1/IGF1R signaling pathway.55 Through these signaling pathways, quercetin inhibits breast cancer cells from acquiring stem-like properties and inhibits their migration.60 The invasive phenotype and EMT of TNBC are blocked, thereby inhibiting cancer cell migration.58

    In addition to modulating signaling pathways, quercetin also exerts its anti-cancer effects by targeting key proteins and environmental factors that influence cancer cell migration and metastasis. For instance, studies have shown that overexpression of the HuR protein is associated with decreased overall survival in TNBC patients. Quercetin has been demonstrated to inhibit the invasive phenotype of TNBC cells by downregulating HuR expression.61 Furthermore, quercetin may inhibit breast cancer metastasis by affecting heat shock proteins and lipid peroxidation pathways.11 These findings highlight quercetin’s multifaceted mechanism of action in targeting various factors that contribute to the aggressiveness and metastatic potential of TNBC cells.

    In summary, quercetin’s anti-cancer effects are mediated through the inhibition of EMT-related signaling pathways, regulation of key proteins such as HuR, and modulation of environmental factors like lipid peroxidation. By targeting multiple pathways and factors associated with the aggressiveness and metastasis of TNBC cells, quercetin emerges as a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of TNBC.

    Mechanism of Action of Some Quercetin Derivatives

    Quercetin, a widely studied flavonoid, has demonstrated significant potential in various therapeutic applications, including anticancer activity. However, its clinical use is often limited by its poor solubility and bioavailability. To address these limitations, researchers have developed various quercetin derivatives, which have shown improved pharmacokinetic properties and enhanced biological activities.

    A mitochondrial targeted derivative of quercetin (mitQ7) induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells at a concentration as low as 1 µM, particularly in the context of glucose depletion.62 This highlights the potential of quercetin derivatives to target cancer cells more effectively under specific metabolic conditions. The maximum 50 values of cytotoxic effects of derivatives 2q, 4q, 8q and 9q on IC were 39.7 ± 0.7, 36.65 ± 0.25, 35.49 ± 0.21 and 36.99 ± 0.45, respectively. Molecular docking also confirmed these results: 8q has the highest binding potential of 9.165 KJ/mole, making it a potent inhibitor of CDK2.63 This suggests that quercetin derivatives can be optimized for specific targets, potentially enhancing their therapeutic efficacy. Quercetin derivatives, such as Quercetin derivatives (QD3) are able to eliminate senescent breast cancer cells by promoting their chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.64 This indicates that quercetin derivatives may have a role in overcoming resistance mechanisms in cancer therapy.

    In terms of safety, quercetin is generally recognized as safe for human consumption at dietary levels. However, higher doses may require careful consideration due to potential side effects. The ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) profile of quercetin indicates that while it is well-tolerated at low doses, its poor bioavailability limits its therapeutic potential. Derivatization strategies aim to improve these properties, making quercetin derivatives more suitable for clinical applications.

    Overall, the development of quercetin derivatives represents a promising approach to enhance the therapeutic potential of this natural compound, addressing its limitations in solubility, bioavailability, and target specificity.

    Other Mechanisms

    In addition to these mechanisms, quercetin has several other mechanisms to improve breast cancer symptoms. Quercetin’s therapeutic potential extends beyond its direct anticancer effects, as it also influences multiple pathways and systems related to breast cancer development and progression. One intriguing aspect of quercetin’s mechanism involves its interaction with the nervous system. Emerging evidence suggests that quercetin can modulate the CNS to influence breast cancer development. Specifically, studies have found that quercetin may reverse the regulatory relationship between neuroinflammation of the CNS and breast cancer progression.65 This relationship is particularly relevant given the growing understanding of the bidirectional communication between the nervous system and cancer cells.

    Further research has elucidated some specific mechanisms underlying quercetin’s effects on the nervous system. For instance, the β2AR/ERK1/2 signaling pathway has been identified as a key pathway through which quercetin exerts its anticancer effects. Chronic stress is known to promote the progression of TNBC via this pathway, but quercetin has been shown to inhibit these effects by specifically targeting the β2AR/ERK1/2 signaling pathway.66 This highlights quercetin’s potential as a therapeutic agent for stress-related cancer progression.

    Beyond its direct effects on breast cancer cells, quercetin also plays a role in managing additional complications associated with breast cancer. For example, quercetin has been identified as a crucial element in mitigating breast cancer-related depression (BCRD). By preventing the abrupt deterioration of BCRD and enhancing the immune system’s response, quercetin can improve the overall quality of life for patient.67 Additionally, quercetin’s therapeutic potential extends to the management of other complications, such as hepatitis and fibrosis caused by breast cancer. Research has shown that quercetin can activate the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which may help in improving these conditions.68

    Quercetin’s ability to enhance the efficacy of other anticancer therapies is another important aspect of its therapeutic potential. For instance, studies have demonstrated that quercetin can significantly enhance the antitumor effects of cyclophosphamide, particularly in a TNBC model.69 This synergistic effect is attributed to quercetin’s ability to inhibit the activity of the enzyme CYP3A4 and the subsequent metabolism of arachidonic acid, thereby impeding the progression of breast cancer.70 While these studies highlight quercetin’s potential as an adjuvant therapy, further research is needed to fully elucidate the specific molecular mechanisms underlying these effects.

    Quercetin, a natural flavonoid compound, demonstrates its anti-breast cancer potential through multi-target, multi-level synergistic mechanisms (Figure 4). Its core molecular structure induces apoptosis and ferroptosis by regulating signaling pathways and epigenetically activating PTEN, inhibiting AKT phosphorylation, suppressing downstream anti-apoptotic proteins, and blocking FAK-mediated survival signals. By targeting the IGF1/IGF1R pathway and the circHIAT1/miR-19a-3p/CADM2 axis, it inhibits EMT and reduces HuR protein expression, thereby attenuating the invasiveness and stem-like properties of TNBC. Derivatives such as mitQ7 and 8qPTEN enhance targeting specificity and efficacy through structural optimization. Systemic regulation involves suppressing the β2AR/ERK neuro-stress pathway, reversing resistance to paclitaxel and CDK4/6 inhibitors, and potentiating cyclophosphamide efficacy via CYP3A4/AA metabolic intervention, while alleviating complications such as neuroinflammation and fibrosis.

    Figure 4 Quercetin’s multimodal mechanisms in breast cancer intervention. This schematic integrates quercetin’s core actions across four functional modules: (A) Signaling Pathway Regulation (B) Cell Death Induction (C) Metastasis Suppression (D) Systemic Coordination. lmage created with BioRender.com,with permission.

    In summary, quercetin’s therapeutic potential in breast cancer management is multifaceted, encompassing direct anticancer effects, modulation of the nervous system, enhancement of immune response, and improvement of treatment-related complications. Although the mechanisms underlying these effects are not yet fully understood, the existing evidence underscores quercetin’s promise as a valuable therapeutic agent in the fight against breast cancer.

    Study on Quercetin Related Drug Carrier

    As previously mentioned, a multitude of studies and literature reports have confirmed that quercetin possesses significant anti-cancer potential. This natural compound has illuminated extensive therapeutic prospects in oncology and has positioned itself as a compelling contender for the advancement of novel anticancer pharmaceuticals. Many studies have begun to study quercetin drug carriers, and the relatively mature ones are nanocarriers and drug-carrying micelles.

    Nanocarrier

    The bioavailability and chemical stability of quercetin can be greatly improved in the form of nanomaterials.71 Within the domain of nano-core drug delivery systems, the polymer-grafted magnetic graphene oxide (GOPVPFe3O4) serves as a nano-core carrier for quercetin, facilitating pH-triggered drug release specifically to breast cancer cells,72 while magnetic core-shell metal-organic framework (MOF) nanocomposites Fe3O4COOH@UiO66NH2 are used for the targeted delivery of quercetin.73 In the application of nano-liposomes, quercetin is prepared into nano-liposomes (QTNLs) to enhance its efficacy in the treatment of breast cancer,74 notably, the QC-SLN possesses a particle diameter of 154 nm, exhibits a zeta potential of −27.7 mV, and achieves an encapsulation efficiency of 99.6%, which shows the best performance and can sustain the release of quercetin for up to 72 hours.75

    For TNBC, a novel hybrid nanoparticle (HNP) has been developed, consisting of a silver nanoparticle (AgNP) core and separately loaded with eEF2K-siRNA and the chemotherapeutic agent quercetin (QU). In vitro experiments on TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, BT-549, 4T1) demonstrated reduced cell viability, inhibited colony formation, and suppressed cell migration. At a high siRNA concentration of 120 nM, 3D spheroid disintegration, activation of apoptotic pathways, and eventual necrotic cell death were observed. The results suggest that the developed HNP is non-toxic, effective, and has the potential to serve as a theranostic platform for TNBC treatment.76

    The combination of nanocarriers and quercetin also offers a novel approach to addressing multidrug resistance (MDR) in breast cancer. A study based on β-cyclodextrin formulations prepared an inclusion complex encapsulating quercetin (QUE) and doxorubicin (DOX) (β-CD@QD IC). In vitro assays indicated that the inclusion complex significantly increased cellular cytotoxicity, induced nuclear condensation, disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and triggered apoptosis-related morphological changes. Hoechst efflux studies showed that QUE effectively inhibited the ABCG2 efflux pump, leading to increased accumulation of Hoechst dye in MCF-7/DOX cancer cells. QUE inhibited SRC kinase signaling, resulting in decreased PI3K/Akt expression and reduced ABCG2 overexpression in MCF-7/DOX cells. This study demonstrated that the β-CD@QD IC loaded with QUE effectively overcame DOX resistance in MCF-7/DOX cells.77

    Furthermore, a novel pH and REDOX dual-stimuli-responsive polymethacrylate/ mesoporous silica nanoparticle core-shell structure has been formulated through the integration of precipitation polymerization with advanced sol-gel modifications, and modified with hyaluronic acid.78 In terms of drug co-loading and synergistic therapy, quercetin is co-loaded with other drugs in nano-carriers to optimize drug delivery; for example, quercetin and curcumin administered intravenously via nano-emulsions have shown enhanced efficacy in breast cancer cells,92 quercetin is co-loaded with Etoposide (ETO) in solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), and quercetin bound to magnetite nanoparticles (QMNPs) shows a synergistic therapeutic effect on breast cancer.93

    In summary, the utilization of quercetin in nanotechnology not only enhances its bioavailability and stability for breast cancer treatment, but also amplifies therapeutic outcomes through co-delivery with additional medications and targeted administration. This highlights its considerable promise as an efficacious therapeutic option in the management of breast cancer.

    Drug Micelles

    Firstly, as a mature drug carrier, micelles have demonstrated their application potential in various fields. In the treatment of breast cancer, quercetin and curcumin are loaded into nano-micellar gels for local therapy, showcasing the advantages of drug micelles in local drug delivery.94 In addition, to achieve targeted co-delivery of drugs, amphiphilic biomaterials PEITOS and HAQU self-assemble into core-shell micelles, which can carry both paclitaxel (PTX) and quercetin (QU), enhancing therapeutic effects and reducing side effects.95 Meanwhile, for paclitaxel and quercetin, BSA hydrogel is also an excellent drug carrier. QUE, TAX encapsulated in BSA hydrogel (QUE@BSA hydrogel, TAX@BSA hydrogel and DOX@BSA hydrogel) reduced the formation of mammospheres and cell migration, caused cell cycle arrest in TNBC cells, decreased cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. They also induced ROS generation and ER stress, highlighting their potential to inhibit the progression of TNBC. The BSA hydrogel carrier demonstrated controllable drug release and enhanced therapeutic effects.96 The combination of amphiphilic hyaluronic acid polymers (dHAD) with quercetin (QT) results in the formation of drug-laden micelles, designated as dHADQT, which also exhibit good stability and biocompatibility in drug delivery systems.97

    In addition, a relatively mature micellar carrier, R-D-Q micelles, was developed by grafting quercetin and the peptide cRGDfk (Arg-Gly-Asp-(D-Phe)-Lys) onto dextran to synthesize the polymer-drug conjugates dextran-quercetin (D-Q) and cRGD-dextran (R-D). Subsequently, cRGD-modified dextran-quercetin polymer micelles (R-D-Q) were constructed through the self-assembly of D-Q and R-D. R-D-Q micelles possess an appropriate particle size (133.4 nm), a nearly neutral potential (8.14 mV), and an excellent drug loading efficiency (13.1%). Moreover, they exhibit higher cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction, and permeability to human breast cancer MCF-7 cells compared to unmodified micelles. R-D-Q micelles effectively inhibit tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice by delivering more quercetin throughout the tumor tissue. R-D-Q micelles promote tumor cell apoptosis by activating the p38 and JNK signaling pathways and inhibiting the ERK signaling pathway. Additionally, R-D-Q micelles do not cause damage to normal tissues in mice at therapeutic doses. These results suggest that R-D-Q micelles have promising prospects as an effective drug delivery system for tumors.98

    Through these studies, we can see the significant role of drug micelles in improving drug efficacy, achieving targeted delivery, and reducing side effects.

    Quercetin Modifications and Cancer

    Tree-like polymer carriers are also a promising direction for drug delivery. Compared with free quercetin (QUR), targeting MCF-7 and HepG-2 cancer cells, respectively, at its safe dose (EC100= 134.35–78.44 μM), MTT assay showed that all quercetin-conjugated tree-like polymers exhibited better anticancer potential (IC50= 12.690–29.316,4.137–29.090 μM). The combination of lassa and PEG increased the anticancer potency, ameliorated apoptosis and downregulated MMP-9 and VEGF gene expression levels in both treated cancer cells. In general, the more branched G4 dendrimers conjugates exhibit excellent overall anticancer properties compared to their respective G3 analogues, except for their MMP-9 inhibition, where the G3 conjugates appear to be more potent and selective than their G4 analogues.99

    Recent advancements in the field of flavonoid chemistry have focused on modifying quercetin to enhance its biological activity and therapeutic potential. One such modification involves the acetylation and methylation of quercetin, which significantly impact its anti-cancer properties. Existing studies have demonstrated that acetylated quercetin (4AcQ) exhibits potent anti-cancer effects by significantly inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis in various cancer cell lines.60 This enhancement in biological activity is attributed to the increased stability and bioavailability of the acetylated form. Acetylation appears to modify the molecular structure of quercetin in a way that enhances its interaction with cellular targets, thereby amplifying its therapeutic efficacy. In contrast, methylated quercetin (4MeQ) has been shown to lose its anti-cancer activity.60 Methylation, which involves the addition of a methyl group to the quercetin molecule, appears to alter its biological properties in a manner that neutralizes its ability to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. This suggests that the specific chemical modifications of quercetin can have a profound impact on its therapeutic potential, highlighting the importance of careful structural design in drug development.

    Additionally, beyond simple acetylation and methylation, other innovative approaches have been explored to enhance quercetin’s efficacy. For instance, the phytosomes of quercetin bound to scorpiotoxin have demonstrated a significant anti-proliferation effect on the breast cancer cell line MCF7 in vitro.42 This indicates that the acetylation of quercetin enhances its anti-cancer properties, while methylation appears to neutralize its biological activity.

    The differential effects of acetylated and methylated quercetin, as well as the enhanced efficacy observed with quercetin-phytosomes, underscore the importance of chemical modifications and delivery systems in optimizing the therapeutic potential of natural compounds. Future research should focus on exploring additional modifications and delivery strategies to further enhance quercetin’s anti-cancer properties and translate these findings into clinical applications.

    Potential Limitations of Nanocarrier and Micellar Systems

    Despite nanocarriers and micellar systems improving therapeutic delivery, their clinical translation faces significant challenges.100 One of the primary challenges is scalability and cost issues arise from complex synthesis processes requiring specialized materials and equipment, compounded by stringent quality control needs, which hinder large-scale production and affordability, especially in resource-limited settings.101 Another critical consideration is biocompatibility concerns persist due to risks of immune activation, inflammatory responses, and long-term tissue accumulation of nanoparticles, necessitating extensive safety evaluations.102 Moreover, environmental sensitivity (pH, temperature, light) compromises stability, leading to premature drug release and reduced shelf life during storage/transport.102 Finally, evolving regulatory frameworks struggle to address nanocarriers’ structural complexity and unpredictable biological interactions, prolonging approval timelines.103

    In conclusion, to advance clinical adoption, research must prioritize cost-effective manufacturing methods, enhanced material stability, rigorous biosafety profiling, and harmonized regulatory standards. Addressing these limitations is critical to balancing therapeutic efficacy with practical applicability in the actual healthcare systems.

    Quercetin in Breast Cancer Therapy: Synergy, Integration, and Challenges

    The Combination of Quercetin and Other Drugs and the Synergistic Mechanism

    Quercetin (QUE), as a versatile natural compound, has exhibited notable promise in the management of breast cancer therapy, especially when integrated with other pharmaceuticals. By combining quercetin with chemotherapeutic agents, the efficacy of these drugs in combating tumors is heightened, while also diminishing the likelihood of tumor resistance to the treatment.49 Quercetin can also enhance the anti-cancer activity of commonly used antitumor drugs, thereby reducing their dosage in the treatment process and making drug-resistant tumor cells sensitive again.53

    For instance, the combined use of quercetin with NaBu has produced a significant synergistic inhibitory effect, which is stronger than the effect of using QUE or NaBu alone.104 Moreover, the combined action of quercetin and chalcone can induce cell cycle arrest at the subG0/G1 phase in MDA-MB-231 cells and alter the expression of caspases 3 and 8.79 The synergistic effects of quercetin/urushetin and naringin have also been observed in two cell lines, with combination therapy being more effective than monotherapy in reducing cell growth, inhibiting migration, and inducing apoptosis.80 The use of quercetin with doxorubicin enhances the toxicity of doxorubicin against both sensitive and resistant MCF7 breast cancer cells,81 and the use of quercetin with etoposide (ETO) enhances the apoptotic pathway by increasing the Bax/Bcl2 gene ratio, elevating p53 and p21 protein levels, and activating caspase 3 and 9 enzymes.82

    Furthermore, the combined administration of quercetin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in contrast to 5-FU monotherapy, exhibits a more potent apoptotic effect by augmenting the expression of Bax and p53, enhancing caspase-9 activity, and suppressing Bcl-2 gene expression.83 In addition, this combined therapy also augments the anti-metastatic effects on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.84 The combined application of quercetin with docetaxel amplifies the anticancer efficacy against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by inducing apoptosis and modulating the PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK, and JAK/STAT3 signaling cascades.85 The combination of quercetin with Naringin (Nar) has synergistic antioxidant and anti-proliferative effects in MCF7 breast cancer cells.86 Co-loaded Spanlastics with quercetin and letrozole show enhanced cytotoxicity in MCF7 breast cancer cells,87 and the synergistic use of fisetin demonstrates markedly enhanced efficacy in assays pertaining to colony formation and wound healing.88

    These studies indicate that combination therapies with quercetin have significant potential in improving therapeutic outcomes, inhibiting cancer cell metastasis, and enhancing anti-cancer activity.

    Clinical Integration and Application of Quercetin in Cancer Therapy

    The integration of quercetin into existing cancer treatment regimens holds significant potential as an adjunct therapy, enhancing the efficacy of existing chemotherapy drugs while potentially reducing their side effects. For instance, quercetin has been shown to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin and doxorubicin, leading to more effective tumor regression. In a recent study, quercetin was found to enhance the antitumor effects of cisplatin in a TNBC model by modulating the tumor microenvironment and promoting apoptosis.89 Additionally, quercetin has been shown to mitigate some of the adverse effects associated with chemotherapy, such as oxidative stress and inflammation, thereby improving patient outcomes.90

    Quercetin exhibits multifaceted therapeutic potential in cancer management through its pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative effects mediated by modulation of critical signaling pathways. Notably, pre-treatment with quercetin in murine models of chemical-induced lung tumorigenesis significantly attenuated neoplastic progression, concomitant with elevated antioxidant enzymatic activity and suppression of lipid peroxidation. This dual regulatory mechanism suggests quercetin’s capacity to counteract carcinogen-induced oxidative damage while suppressing tumorigenic signaling networks. 500 Moreover, quercetin has demonstrated chemopreventive effects by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing lipid peroxidation. These properties make quercetin a valuable candidate for integrative cancer care.91

    When considering the clinical application of quercetin, several factors should be taken into account. First, quercetin is available in various forms, including capsules, tablets, and liquid extracts. The optimal dosing for adjunct therapy is still under investigation, but current studies suggest that doses ranging from 500 mg to 1000 mg per day may be effective.30 Additionally, clinicians should monitor patients for potential interactions with other medications, as quercetin can inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes, which may affect the metabolism of certain drugs.32 Lastly, patient education is crucial. Educating patients about the importance of adhering to prescribed dosages and the potential for interactions with other medications can help ensure safe and effective use.

    Potential Challenges and Risks of Quercetin Combination Therapy

    The synergistic effects of quercetin with therapeutic agents should be cautiously evaluated due to risks of unforeseen toxicity and drug-drug interactions, which may reduce therapeutic efficacy or amplify adverse effects.

    Quercetin exhibits context-dependent bioactivity, which may lead to unforeseen toxicity when used in combination with other drugs. For example, in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, quercetin demonstrates dose-dependent antagonistic effects when combined with tamoxifen. At low concentrations (eg, 5 μM), quercetin counteracts tamoxifen’s anti-proliferative effects and potentially promotes tumor progression. Conversely, at high doses (eg, 50 μM), quercetin synergizes with tamoxifen to induce apoptosis but may exacerbate oxidative stress in normal tissues, raising concerns about toxicity.105 Additionally, although quercetin can suppress hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression by downregulating P4HA2 and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, its combination with PI3K inhibitors (eg, LY294002) may result in excessive pathway suppression, impairing normal hepatocyte survival and liver regeneration. When co-administration with PI3K activators (eg, 740Y-P) could antagonize quercetin’s pro-apoptotic effects, inadvertently promoting tumor cell survival. These findings highlight the context-dependent risks associated with targeting overlapping signaling pathways.106

    Quercetin regulates drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics through various mechanisms, and its effects may be influenced by potential drug-drug interactions. In cholangiocarcinoma, quercetin pretreatment reduced the IC50 of sorafenib and oxaliplatin, raising concerns about overdosing in patients with impaired hepatic metabolism.107 Quercetin inhibits platelet aggregation and synergizes with anticoagulants (eg, warfarin), increasing bleeding risks in preclinical models.108

    In conclusion, the dual role of quercetin in enhancing therapeutic efficacy while posing interaction risks demands systematic pharmacokinetic monitoring, patient stratification, and clinical validation of dose thresholds. Future studies should prioritize combinatorial regimens with real-time therapeutic drug monitoring and mechanistic validation to balance efficacy and safety.

    Comparison of Quercetin with Prescription Breast Cancer Medicines

    Mechanisms of Action and Efficacy

    Traditional prescription medicines for breast cancer treatments, such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, primarily exert their antitumor effects through mechanisms like DNA damage induction or synthesis inhibition. For example, cisplatin forms intrastrand and interstrand DNA cross-links, disrupting DNA replication and transcription. Paclitaxel stabilizes microtubules, preventing cell division and inducing apoptosis. These drugs are often used in combination regimens to enhance therapeutic efficacy and mitigate resistance.109

    Quercetin enhances the effectiveness of traditional prescription medicines like cisplatin by targeting different molecular pathways. It modulates signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis, making it a promising adjuvant for cancer therapy. Quercetin’s selective action against malignant cells allows it to complement traditional chemotherapy agents, potentially improving overall treatment outcomes.110

    In summary, traditional prescription medicines such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin primarily target tumor cells through mechanisms like DNA damage and inhibition of cell division. These drugs often require combination therapies to enhance efficacy and overcome resistance. Unlike traditional prescription medicines, quercetin demonstrates selective action against cancer cells by targeting molecular pathways involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis. The selective targeting allows quercetin to potentially improve treatment outcomes through complementary mechanisms.

    Safety and Toxicity

    Traditional prescription medicines for breast cancer treatments, such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, are effective in tumor regression and improving survival rates. However, they often result in significant systemic toxicity. Common side effects include immunosuppression, gastrointestinal disturbances, and alopecia, which can severely impact patient quality of life.111

    Quercetin demonstrates selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells with reduced toxicity at therapeutic doses. However, its clinical application is limited by pharmacokinetic challenges such as low oral bioavailability and poor aqueous solubility, but recent advancements in nanoparticle-based delivery systems offer promising solutions to enhance quercetin’s bioavailability and efficacy.91

    Traditional prescription medicines, despite their efficacy in tumor regression, are associated with significant systemic toxicity that can severely impact patient quality of life. In contrast, quercetin offers a safer alternative with selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells and reduced toxicity at therapeutic doses. Currently, nanoparticle-based delivery systems are addressing the limitations of quercetin’s clinical application due to pharmacokinetic challenges, with the potential to enhance its bioavailability and efficacy while maintaining its safety profile.

    Quercetin in Cancer Research: In Vivo and Clinical Studies

    In Vivo Studies with Quercetin in Animal Models

    Numerous in vivo studies have demonstrated the anticancer potential of quercetin in animal models of breast cancer. For example, quercetin has been shown to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in breast cancer xenograft mouse models. Treatment with quercetin (50 mg/kg) significantly reduced tumor volume and decreased the expression of key proteins involved in tumor progression, such as VEGF and PKM2.112 Furthermore, quercetin has been shown to enhance the antitumor effects of cisplatin in EMT6 tumor xenograft mouse models, leading to a more significant reduction in tumor size compared to cisplatin alone.53

    Quercetin also modulates the tumor microenvironment by regulating the gut microbiota. In a TNBC mouse model, dietary supplementation with quercetin significantly increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria like Akkermansia and enhanced the activation of effector T cells and NK cells, thereby promoting anti-tumor immunity.112 Additionally, quercetin has demonstrated significant metabolic and anti-inflammatory benefits in obese mice models, reducing liver fat and blood glucose levels while promoting beneficial gut bacteria.112

    Clinical Trials of Quercetin in Different Types of Cancer

    Currently, there are no clinical trials evaluating the effects of quercetin in breast cancer patients. This may be due to the numerous targets of quercetin’s immunomodulatory action, its low oral bioavailability, and uncertainties surrounding effective dosages and potential toxic side effects.112 However, preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of quercetin as an anti-cancer agent in breast cancer.

    Although clinical trials in breast cancer patients are lacking, several studies have been conducted on quercetin in patients with other types of cancer, providing insights into its potential therapeutic effects in breast cancer. For instance: In a Phase II clinical trial, quercetin in combination with gemcitabine was well-tolerated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and showed promising clinical benefits, with a median overall survival of 6.5 months and a median progression-free survival of 3.5 months.69 Quercetin was found to enhance the efficacy of cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The combination treatment resulted in a higher response rate and longer progression-free survival compared to cisplatin alone.69 Additionally, a Phase II clinical trial investigated the efficacy of quercetin in reducing buccal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with Fanconi anemia. Reyes-Farias et al found that quercetin reduced buccal micronuclei and the need for potentially lethal treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.21

    In summary, while there is currently no clinical evidence to support the use of quercetin in the treatment of breast cancer patients, the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials in other cancer types suggest that quercetin may have potential therapeutic effects in breast cancer. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal dosage, safety, and efficacy of quercetin in breast cancer patients. In future research, it is crucial to conduct well-designed clinical trials to investigate the effects of quercetin in breast cancer patients, which will help lay the foundation for the clinical application of quercetin as a potential adjuvant in breast cancer treatment.

    Discussion

    Future research on quercetin in cancer therapy should prioritize rigorously designed clinical trials to validate its preclinical efficacy and translate findings into clinical practice. Key foci include optimizing quercetin’s dosing and timing in combination therapies (eg, enhancing docetaxel efficacy in prostate cancer113 and sensitizing ovarian cancer to cisplatin114), identifying predictive biomarkers (eg, genetic or metabolic profiles) for personalized treatment, and exploring its preventive potential via antioxidant/anti- inflammatory mechanisms in high-risk populations.33 These efforts will bridge translational gaps, balancing therapeutic innovation with mechanistic validation to advance quercetin’s role in oncology.

    In comparison with the existing review articles, our review makes three key innovations. Primarily, it delivers unprecedented mechanistic granularity by delineating breast cancer specific molecular pathways, resolving subtype specific inconsistencies overlooked in prior reviews. Furthermore, it critically evaluates nanocarriers and micellar systems to address pharmacokinetic limitations of quercetin while interrogating biocompatibility and scalability challenges, providing a balanced analysis of delivery innovations lacking in prior analyses. Critically, it redefines quercetin as a multimodal agent synergizing apoptosis induction, metastasis suppression, and microenvironment modulation, while positioning flavonoid based strategies at the heart of precision breast cancer therapeutics through comparative efficacy and toxicity profiling against standard chemotherapies. Collectively, these advances establish quercetin as a multitargeted agent in breast oncology, integrating mechanistic specificity, delivery optimization, and clinical translation to pioneer a phytochemical driven paradigm for targeted cancer therapy.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, quercetin, a natural flavonoid, holds the potential to inhibit cancer cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, and prevent metastasis. It has demonstrated significant therapeutic value, especially in TNBC, a subtype that lacks effective therapeutic targets. By modulating key signaling pathways and enhancing immune responses, quercetin effectively curbs tumor progression. Moreover, its synergistic effects with traditional chemotherapeutic agents not only significantly enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy but also help overcome drug resistance. The potential of this combination therapy may lead to the development of more effective treatment regimens.

    Although the preclinical findings are encouraging, the necessity and urgency of conducting clinical trials and translational research to translate quercetin into clinical applications cannot be overstated. These studies are crucial for validating the safety and efficacy of quercetin in real-world treatments and ensuring that it can provide precise and effective therapeutic options for breast cancer patients.

    Funding

    This research was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province Youth Project (20242BAB20404), Jiangxi Province’ Ganpo Talent Program’ Innovation Leadership Talent (gpyc20240199), Key Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (GJJ2400104), Science and Technology Plan Project of Jiangxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2024A0090), the Youth Talent Research Training Foundation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (YFYPY2023103) and the Full time Talent Introduction and Research Start up Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (RSC-0020).

    Disclosure

    The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

    References

    1. Weber WP, Hanson SE, Wong DE, et al. Personalizing locoregional therapy in patients with breast cancer in 2024: tailoring axillary surgery, escalating lymphatic surgery, and implementing evidence-based hypofractionated radiotherapy. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024;44(3):e438776. doi:10.1200/EDBK_438776

    2. Nolan E, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic. Cell. 2023;186(8):1708–1728. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.040

    3. Borri F, Granaglia A. Pathology of triple negative breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;72:136–145. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.06.005

    4. So JY, Ohm J, Lipkowitz S, Yang L. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): non-genetic tumor heterogeneity and immune microenvironment: emerging treatment options. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;237:108253. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108253

    5. Das A, Mandal SK, Arya S, et al. Therapeutic approach for triple-negative breast cancer through poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitors: current update. Bioorg Chem. 2025;163:108558. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2025.108558

    6. Yuan J, Liu Y, Zhang T, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine for breast cancer treatment: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Pharm Biol. 2024;62(1):499–512. doi:10.1080/13880209.2024.2359105

    7. Wu S, Yan M, Liu J, et al. Clerodendranthus spicatus inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of renal tubular cells through the NF-κB/snail signalling pathway in hyperuricaemia nephropathy. Pharm Biol. 2023;61(1):1274–1285. doi:10.1080/13880209.2023.2243086

    8. Yao J, Zhang C, Yu C, et al. Immune microenvironment modulation for treating inflammatory periodontal bone defects using a dynamic dual-responsive hydrogel. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(26):7819–7837. doi:10.1039/D5TB00784D

    9. Wang K, Chen Q, Shao Y, et al. Anticancer activities of TCM and their active components against tumor metastasis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;133:111044. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111044

    10. Yang Z, Zhang Q, Yu L, Zhu J, Cao Y, Gao X. The signaling pathways and targets of traditional Chinese medicine and natural medicine in triple-negative breast cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;264:113249. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2020.113249

    11. Ezzati M, Yousefi B, Velaei K, Safa A. A review on anti-cancer properties of quercetin in breast cancer. Life Sci. 2020;248:117463. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117463

    12. Cao H, Song H, Zhou W, et al. Exploring the active ingredients of Banzhilian and its mechanism of action on diabetic gastric cancer based on network pharmacology. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):14808. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-98214-6

    13. Jian X, Shi C, Luo W, Zhou L, Jiang L, Liu K. Therapeutic effects and molecular mechanisms of quercetin in gynecological disorders. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;173:116418. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116418

    14. Xu D, Hu MJ, Wang YQ, Cui YL. Antioxidant activities of quercetin and its complexes for medicinal application. Molecules. 2019;24(6):1123. doi:10.3390/molecules24061123

    15. Lesjak M, Beara I, Simin N, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives. J Functional Foods. 2018;40:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.jff.2017.10.047

    16. Saeedi-Boroujeni A, Mahmoudian-Sani MR. Anti-inflammatory potential of quercetin in COVID-19 treatment. J Inflamm. 2021;18(1):3. doi:10.1186/s12950-021-00268-6

    17. Hassanien MM, Saad EA, Radwan KH. Antidiabetic activity of cobalt–quercetin complex: a new potential candidate for diabetes treatment. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2020;10(12):044–052.

    18. Hibiscus Sabdariffa Linn: phytochemical impact on the mechanism of neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory pathways. Recent Adv Inflammat Allergy Drug Dis. 2024;18.

    19. Yi H, Peng H, Wu X, et al. The therapeutic effects and mechanisms of quercetin on metabolic diseases: pharmacological data and clinical evidence. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021(1):6678662. doi:10.1155/2021/6678662

    20. Tang H, Kuang Y, Wu W, Peng B, Fu Q. Quercetin inhibits the metabolism of arachidonic acid by inhibiting the activity of CYP3A4, thereby inhibiting the progression of breast cancer. Mol Med. 2023;29(1):127. doi:10.1186/s10020-023-00720-8

    21. Reyes-Farias M, Carrasco-Pozo C. The anti-cancer effect of quercetin: molecular implications in cancer metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(13):3177. doi:10.3390/ijms20133177

    22. Batra P, Sharma AK. Anti-cancer potential of flavonoids: recent trends and future perspectives. 3. Biotech. 2013;3(6):439–459.

    23. Cassidy A, Huang T, Rice MS, Rimm EB, Tworoger SS. Intake of dietary flavonoids and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(5):1344–1351. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.088708

    24. Gates MA, Tworoger SS, Hecht JL, De Vivo I, Rosner B, Hankinson SE. A prospective study of dietary flavonoid intake and incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int, J, Cancer. 2007;121(10):2225–2232. doi:10.1002/ijc.22790

    25. Hertog M, Hollman P, Katan M. Content of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids of 28 vegetables and 9 fruits commonly consumed in the Netherlands. J Agric Food Chem. 1992;40(12):2379–2383. doi:10.1021/jf00024a011

    26. Larsson SC, Holmberg L, Wolk A. Fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to ovarian cancer incidence: the Swedish mammography cohort. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(11):2167–2170. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601872

    27. Scalbert A, Williamson G. Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols. J Nutr. 2000;130(8S Suppl):2073S–2085S.23. doi:10.1093/jn/130.8.2073S

    28. Schulz M, Lahmann P, Boeing H, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(11 Pt 1):2531. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0159

    29. Wu S, Tian Y, Zhang Q, et al. Protective effect of quercetin on lipopolysaccharide‑induced miscarriage based on animal experiments and network pharmacology. Mol Med Rep. 2024;29(6):99. doi:10.3892/mmr.2024.13223

    30. Mirza MA, Mahmood S, Hilles AR, et al. Quercetin as a therapeutic product: evaluation of its pharmacological action and clinical applications-a review. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(11):1631. doi:10.3390/ph16111631

    31. Boots AW, Haenen GRMM, Bast A. Health effects of quercetin: from antioxidant to nutraceutical. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;585(2–3):325–337. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.008

    32. Mohos V, Fliszár-Nyúl E, Ungvári O, et al. Inhibitory effects of quercetin and its main methyl, sulfate, and glucuronic acid conjugates on cytochrome P450 enzymes, and on OATP, BCRP and MRP2 transporters. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2306. doi:10.3390/nu12082306

    33. Tang H, Li YX, Lian JJ, Ng HY, Wang SSY. Personalized treatment using predictive biomarkers in solid organ malignancies: a review. Tumori. 2024;110(5):386–404. doi:10.1177/03008916241261484

    34. Alsufyani MM, Alqarni WM, Alzahrani Y, Balbed AK, Alkathyri MM, Rahman MA. Spontaneous nanoemulsification for solubility enhancement of BCS class II and IV molecules, quercetin as a model drug. MethodsX. 2025;14:103298. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103298

    35. Pradnyanand K, Sumit M, Mitali M, Nilesh C. Review on phyto-chemistry & pharmacological activity of Melia azedarach. ResearchGate. 2024.

    36. Alva-Ensastegui JC, Palomar-Pardavé M, Romero-Romo M, Ramírez-Silva MT. Quercetin spectrofluorometric quantification in aqueous media using different surfactants as fluorescence promoters. RSC Adv. 2018;8(20):10980–10986. doi:10.1039/C8RA01213J

    37. de Matos AM, Blázquez-Sánchez MT, Sousa C, Oliveira MC, de Almeida RFM, Rauter AP. C-glucosylation as a tool for the prevention of PAINS-induced membrane dipole potential alterations. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4443. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83032-3

    38. G N, Mg K, Ea R, et al. Quercetin: a potential polydynamic drug. Molecules. 2023;28(24).

    39. Neamtu AA, Maghiar TA, Alaya A, et al. A comprehensive view on the quercetin impact on colorectal cancer. Molecules. 2022;27(6):1873. doi:10.3390/molecules27061873

    40. Umar SM, Patra S, Kashyap A, Dev J R JRA, Kumar L, Prasad CP. Quercetin impairs hur-driven progression and migration of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cells. Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(4):1497–1510. doi:10.1080/01635581.2021.1952628

    41. Afarin R, Ahmadpour F, Hatami M, Monjezi S, Igder S. Combination of etoposide and quercetin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles Potentiates apoptotic effects on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e31925. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31925

    42. Alsharairi NA. Quercetin derivatives as potential therapeutic agents: an updated perspective on the treatment of nicotine-induced non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):15208. doi:10.3390/ijms242015208

    43. Mekkawy AI, Eleraky NE, Soliman GM, Elnaggar MG, Elnaggar MG. Combinatorial therapy of letrozole- and quercetin-loaded spanlastics for Enhanced cytotoxicity against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(8):1727. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14081727

    44. Maleki Dana P, Sadoughi F, Asemi Z, Yousefi B. Anti-cancer properties of quercetin in osteosarcoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):349. doi:10.1186/s12935-021-02067-8

    45. Przybylski P, Lewińska A, Rzeszutek I, et al. Mutation status and glucose availability affect the response to mitochondria-targeted quercetin derivative in breast cancer cells. Cancers. 2023;15(23):5614. doi:10.3390/cancers15235614

    46. Ng SG, Vd S, Ld P, et al. Quercetin activates vitamin D receptor and ameliorates breast cancer induced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Front Nutri. 2023;10.

    47. Unnikrishnan meenakshi D, Narde GK, Ahuja A, Al Balushi K, Francis AP, Khan SA. Therapeutic applications of nanoformulated resveratrol and quercetin phytochemicals in colorectal cancer-an updated review. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(6):761. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16060761

    48. Ghafouri-Fard S, Shabestari FA, Vaezi S, et al. Emerging impact of quercetin in the treatment of prostate cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;138:111548. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111548

    49. Almohammad Aljabr B, Zihlif M, Abu-Dahab R, Zalloum H. Effect of quercetin on doxorubicin cytotoxicity in sensitive and resistant human MCF7 breast cancer cell lines. Biomed Rep. 2024;20(4):58. doi:10.3892/br.2024.1745

    50. Mawalizadeh F, Mohammadzadeh G, Khedri A, Rashidi M. Quercetin potentiates the chemosensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(12):7733–7742. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06782-3

    51. Li C, Xu Y, Zhang J, et al. The effect of resveratrol, curcumin and quercetin combination on immuno-suppression of tumor microenvironment for breast tumor-bearing mice. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13278. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39279-z

    52. Zhu Q, Han Y, He Y, et al. Quercetin inhibits neuronal ferroptosis and promotes immune response by targeting lipid metabolism-related gene PTGS2 to alleviate breast cancer-related depression. Phytomedicine. 2024;130:155560. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155560

    53. Maugeri A, Calderaro A, Patanè GT, et al. Targets Involved in the anti-cancer activity of quercetin in breast, colorectal and liver neoplasms. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(3):2952. doi:10.3390/ijms24032952

    54. Zhu S, Yu W, Bi L, et al. Quercetin induces apoptosis of human breast cancer cells by activiting PTEN and inhibiting PI3K/AKT and JNK signaling pathways. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022;38(8):714–720.

    55. Sethi G, Rath P, Chauhan A, et al. Apoptotic mechanisms of quercetin in liver cancer: recent Trends and advancements. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(2):712. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020712

    56. Shafabakhsh R, Asemi Z. Quercetin: a natural compound for ovarian cancer treatment. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):55. doi:10.1186/s13048-019-0530-4

    57. Safi A, Heidarian E, Ahmadi R. Quercetin synergistically enhances the anticancer efficacy of docetaxel through induction of apoptosis and modulation of PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK, and JAK/STAT3 signaling pathways in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2021;10(1):11–22. doi:10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.10.1.11

    58. Tang SM, Deng XT, Zhou J, Li QP, Ge XX, Miao L. Pharmacological basis and new insights of quercetin action in respect to its anti-cancer effects. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121:109604. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109604

    59. Jiang J, Yang Y, Wang F, Mao W, Wang Z, Liu Z. Quercetin inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation and survival by targeting Akt/mTOR/PTEN signaling pathway. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2024;103(6):e14557. doi:10.1111/cbdd.14557

    60. Chen WJ, Tsai JH, Hsu LS, Lin CL, Hong HM, Pan MH. Quercetin blocks the aggressive phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting IGF1/IGF1R-mediated EMT program. J Food Drug Anal. 2021;29(1):98–112. doi:10.38212/2224-6614.3090

    61. Zhu Q, Yang L, Yang H, Han Y, Chen Y, He Y. Quercetin alleviates the progression of breast cancer-related depression via inhibiting the pyroptosis and promoting the immune response. Mediators Inflamm. 2022;2022:8011988. doi:10.1155/2022/8011988

    62. Numata M, Hirano A, Yamamoto Y, et al. Metastasis of breast cancer promoted by circadian rhythm disruption due to light/dark shift and its prevention by dietary quercetin in mice. J Circadian Rhythms. 2021;19(1):2. doi:10.5334/jcr.203

    63. Luo T, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. The central nervous system can directly regulate breast cancer progression and blockage by quercetin. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(12):999. doi:10.21037/atm-21-2558

    64. Khan MR, Khan MA, Ahmad I, et al. Synthesis of quercetin derivatives as cytotoxic against breast cancer MCF-7 cell line in vitro and in silico studies. Future Med Chem. 2024;16(17):1749–1759. doi:10.1080/17568919.2024.2379241

    65. Zhang J, Teng F, Wu T, Li S, Li K. Quercetin inhibits chronic stress-mediated progression of triple-negative breast cancer by blocking β2-AR/ERK1/2 pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;177:116985. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116985

    66. Shaw S, Chourasia M, Nayak R, et al. Molecular interaction of quercetin and its derivatives against nucleolin in breast cancer: in-silico and in-vitro study. J Biomol Struct Dyn;2024. 1–12. doi:10.1080/07391102.2024.2326668

    67. Yang Y, Yan J, Huang J, et al. Exploring the mechanism by which quercetin re-sensitizes breast cancer to paclitaxel: network pharmacology, molecular docking, and experimental verification. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2023;396(11):3045–3059. doi:10.1007/s00210-023-02510-9

    68. Qiu D, Yan X, Xiao X, et al. To explore immune synergistic function of quercetin in inhibiting breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):632. doi:10.1186/s12935-021-02345-5

    69. Lotfi N, Yousefi Z, Golabi M, et al. The potential anti-cancer effects of quercetin on blood, prostate and lung cancers: an update. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1077531. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1077531

    70. An S, Hu M. Quercetin promotes TFEB nuclear translocation and activates lysosomal degradation of ferritin to induce ferroptosis in breast Cancer cells. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022;2022:5299218. doi:10.1155/2022/5299218

    71. Kasiri N, Rahmati M, Ahmadi L, Eskandari N, Motedayyen H. Therapeutic potential of quercetin on human breast cancer in different dimensions. Inflammopharmacology. 2020;28(1):39–62. doi:10.1007/s10787-019-00660-y

    72. Cheng HW, Chiang CS, Ho HY, et al. Dextran-modified quercetin-cu(II)/hyaluronic acid nanomedicine with natural poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and dual targeting for programmed synthetic lethal therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. J Control Release. 2021;329:136–147. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.061

    73. Matiyani M, Rana A, Pal M, Rana S, Melkani AB, Sahoo NG. Polymer grafted magnetic graphene oxide as a potential nanocarrier for pH-responsive delivery of sparingly soluble quercetin against breast cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2022;12(5):2574–2588. doi:10.1039/D1RA05382E

    74. Parsaei M, Akhbari K. Magnetic UiO-66-NH2 core-shell nanohybrid as a promising carrier for quercetin targeted delivery toward human breast cancer cells. ACS Omega. 2023;8(44):41321–41338. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c04863

    75. Bhargav E, Mohammed N, Singh UN, et al. A central composite design-based targeted quercetin nanoliposomal formulation: optimization and cytotoxic studies on MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. Heliyon. 2024;10(17):e37430. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37430

    76. Eksi OB, Guler A, Akdeniz M, Atalay P, Hamurcu Z, Aydin O. Development of silver-based hybrid nanoparticles loaded with eEF2 K-siRNA and quercetin against triple-negative breast cancer. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2025. doi:10.1007/s13346-025-01860-6

    77. Pawar CS, Balamurugan K, Baskar S, Prasad NR, Khan HA. Enhancing chemosensitivity in drug-resistant breast cancer cells using β-cyclodextrin-loaded quercetin and doxorubicin inclusion complex via modulating SRC/PI3K/Akt pathway. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2025;197(6):4068–4095. doi:10.1007/s12010-025-05219-y

    78. Hatami M, Kouchak M, Kheirollah A, Khorsandi L, Rashidi M. Quercetin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles exhibit antitumor activity and suppress the proliferation of triple-negative MDA-MB 231 breast cancer cells: implications for invasive breast cancer treatment. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50(11):9417–9430. doi:10.1007/s11033-023-08848-w

    79. Rhman MA, Devnarain N, Khan R, Owira PMO. Synergism potentiates oxidative antiproliferative effects of naringenin and quercetin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Nutrients. 2022;14(16):3437. doi:10.3390/nu14163437

    80. Betts Z, Deveci Ozkan A, Yuksel B, et al. Investigation of the combined cytotoxicity induced by sodium butyrate and a flavonoid quercetin treatment on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2023;86(22):833–845. doi:10.1080/15287394.2023.2254807

    81. Sakao K, Hamamoto S, Urakawa D, He Z, Hou DX. Anticancer activity and molecular mechanisms of acetylated and methylated quercetin in human breast cancer cells. Molecules. 2024;29(10):2408. doi:10.3390/molecules29102408

    82. Jalalpour Choupanan M, Shahbazi S, Reiisi S. Naringenin in combination with quercetin/fisetin shows synergistic anti-proliferative and migration reduction effects in breast cancer cell lines. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50(9):7489–7500. doi:10.1007/s11033-023-08664-2

    83. Ramos PS, Ferreira C, Passos CLA, Silva JL, Fialho E. Effect of quercetin and chrysin and its association on viability and cell cycle progression in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;179:117276. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117276

    84. Sun J, Li M, Lin K, et al. Delivery of quercetin for breast cancer and targeting potentiation via hyaluronic nano-micelles. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242(Pt 2):124736. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124736

    85. Lewińska A, Przybylski P, Adamczyk-Grochala J, Błoniarz D, Litwinienko G, Wnuk M. Senolysis-based elimination of chemotherapy-induced senescent breast cancer cells by quercetin derivative with blocked hydroxy groups. Cancers. 2022;14(3):605. doi:10.3390/cancers14030605

    86. Manni A, Sun YW, Schell TD, et al. Complementarity between microbiome and immunity may account for the potentiating effect of quercetin on the antitumor action of cyclophosphamide in a triple-negative breast cancer model. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(10):1422. doi:10.3390/ph16101422

    87. Hosseini SS, Ebrahimi SO, Haji Ghasem Kashani M, Reiisi S. Study of quercetin and fisetin synergistic effect on breast cancer and potentially involved signaling pathways. Cell Biol Int. 2023;47(1):98–109. doi:10.1002/cbin.11942

    88. Alhakamy NA, Fahmy UA, Eldin SMB, et al. Scorpion venom-functionalized quercetin phytosomes for breast cancer management: in vitro response surface optimization and anticancer activity against MCF-7 Cells. Polymers. 2021;14(1):93. doi:10.3390/polym14010093

    89. Hu Y, Li R, Jin J, Wang Y, Ma R. Quercetin improves pancreatic cancer chemo-sensitivity by regulating oxidative-inflammatory networks. J Food Biochem. 2022;46(12):e14453. doi:10.1111/jfbc.14453

    90. Salehi B, Machin L, Monzote L, et al. Therapeutic potential of quercetin: new insights and perspectives for human health. ACS Omega. 2020;5(20):11849–11872. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c01818

    91. Soltani M, Ahmadzadeh N, Nasiraei Haghighi H, Khatamian N, Homayouni Tabrizi M. Targeted cancer therapy potential of quercetin-conjugated with folic acid-modified nanocrystalline cellulose nanoparticles: a study on AGS and A2780 cell lines. BMC Biotechnol. 2025;25(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12896-025-00962-w

    92. Ghalehkhondabi V, Soleymani M, Fazlali A. Synthesis of quercetin-loaded hyaluronic acid-conjugated pH/redox dual-stimuli responsive poly(methacrylic acid)/mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles for breast cancer targeted therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;263(Pt 1):130168. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130168

    93. Rahman MA, Mittal V, Wahab S, Alsayari A, Bin Muhsinah A, Almaghaslah D. Intravenous nanocarrier for improved efficacy of quercetin and curcumin against breast cancer cells: development and comparison of single and dual drug-loaded formulations using hemolysis, cytotoxicity and cellular uptake studies. Membranes. 2022;12(7):713. doi:10.3390/membranes12070713

    94. Askar MA, El-Nashar HA, Al-Azzawi MA, Rahman SSA, Elshawi OE. Synergistic effect of quercetin magnetite nanoparticles and targeted radiotherapy in treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2022;16:11782234221086728. doi:10.1177/11782234221086728

    95. Tilawat M, Bonde S. Curcumin and quercetin loaded nanocochleates gel formulation for localized application in breast cancer therapy. Heliyon. 2023;9(12):e22892. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22892

    96. Kundrapu DB, Rao PA, Malla RR. Enhanced efficacy of quercetin and taxifolin encapsulated with pH-responsive injectable BSA hydrogel for targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;287:138477. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138477

    97. Qian J, Liu S, Yang T, et al. Polyethyleneimine- -tocopherol hydrogen succinate/hyaluronic acid-quercetin (PEI-TOS/HA-QU) core-shell micelles delivering paclitaxel for combinatorial treatment of MDR breast cancer. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2021;17(3):382–398. doi:10.1166/jbn.2021.3032

    98. Yang C, Ma H, Liang Z, et al. Cyclic RGD modified dextran-quercetin polymer micelles for targeted therapy of breast cancer. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;308(Pt 1):142272. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142272

    99. Ramadan DR, Osman HA, Madhy SA, et al. A tailored 4G s-triazine-based dendrimer vehicle for quercetin endowed with MMP-2/9 inhibition and VEGF downregulation for targeting breast cancer progression and liver metastasis. RSC Adv. 2025;15(13):10426–10441. doi:10.1039/D5RA01588J

    100. Alshawwa SZ, Kassem AA, Farid RM, Mostafa SK, Labib GS. Nanocarrier drug delivery systems: characterization, limitations, future perspectives and implementation of artificial intelligence. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(4):883. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14040883

    101. Xia W, King MW. Advances in targeted delivery of doxorubicin for cancer chemotherapy. Bioengineering. 2025;12(4):430. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12040430

    102. Hu J, Arvejeh PM, Bone S, Hett E, Marincola FM, Roh KH. Nanocarriers for cutting-edge cancer immunotherapies. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):447. doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06435-0

    103. Noreen S, Maqbool I, Saleem A, Mahmood H, Rai N. Recent insights and applications of nanocarriers-based drug delivery systems for colonic drug delivery and cancer therapy: an updated review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2025;208:104646. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104646

    104. Zhao L, Zhao H, Zhao Y, et al. Role of ginseng, quercetin, and tea in enhancing chemotherapeutic efficacy of colorectal cancer. Front Med Lausanne. 2022;9:939424. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.939424

    105. Xu Z, Zhao D, Zheng X, Huang B, Xia X, Pan X. Quercetin exerts bidirectional regulation effects on the efficacy of tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer therapy: an in vitro study. Environ Toxicol. 2020;35(11):1179–1193. doi:10.1002/tox.22983

    106. Zhang J, Guo J, Qian Y, et al. Quercetin induces apoptosis through downregulating P4HA2 and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells: an in vitro study. Cancer Rep. 2025;8(5):e70220.

    107. Abdu S, Juaid N, Amin A, Moulay M, Miled N. Effects of sorafenib and quercetin alone or in combination in treating hepatocellular carcinoma: in vitro and In vivo approaches. Molecules. 2022;27(22). doi:10.3390/molecules27228082

    108. Patel R, Stine A, Zitko K. Enhanced anticoagulant effect of warfarin when co-administered with quercetin. J Pharm Technol. 2022;38(6):374–375. doi:10.1177/87551225221125667

    109. Zhai J, Gu X, Liu Y, Hu Y, Jiang Y, Zhang Z. Chemotherapeutic and targeted drugs-induced immunogenic cell death in cancer models and antitumor therapy: an update review. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1152934. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1152934

    110. Rather RA, Bhagat M. Quercetin as an innovative therapeutic tool for cancer chemoprevention: molecular mechanisms and implications in human health. Cancer Med. 2020;9(24):9181–9192. doi:10.1002/cam4.1411

    111. Kciuk M, Gielecińska A, Mujwar S, et al. Doxorubicin-an agent with multiple mechanisms of anticancer activity. Cells. 2023;12(4):659. doi:10.3390/cells12040659

    112. Fang L, Gao D, Wang T, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Wang S. From nature to clinic: quercetin’s role in breast cancer immunomodulation. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1483459. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1483459

    113. Sharma S, Cwiklinski K, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Aalinkeel R. Combination modality using quercetin to enhance the efficacy of docetaxel in prostate cancer cells. Cancers. 2023;15(3):902. doi:10.3390/cancers15030902

    114. Islam MR, Rahman MM, Dhar PS, et al. The role of natural and semi-synthetic compounds in ovarian cancer: updates on mechanisms of action, current trends and perspectives. Molecules. 2023;28(5):2070. doi:10.3390/molecules28052070

    Continue Reading

  • Relationship Between Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Patient-Controlled Analgesia Consumption Following Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Study

    Relationship Between Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Patient-Controlled Analgesia Consumption Following Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Study


    Continue Reading

  • James Gunn Didn’t Want to Make ‘Superman.’ What Changed His Mind? – The New York Times

    1. James Gunn Didn’t Want to Make ‘Superman.’ What Changed His Mind?  The New York Times
    2. James Gunn Recalls Telling Henry Cavill He Was Recasting Superman  TheWrap
    3. James Gunn Recalls Henry Cavill’s Reaction To ‘Superman’ Re-Casting News: “This Poor Guy”  Deadline
    4. James Gunn Already Has a Brilliant Fix For DC’s Most Brutal Firing  Men’s Journal
    5. The Story Of Henry Cavill’s Superman Exit Just Got So Much Worse  Screen Rant

    Continue Reading