Follow along for buildup and latest updates from Aston Villa vs Arsenal with our live blog, which will appear right below this short preview
Arsenal travel to Villa Park to face Aston Villa in the early kickoff on Saturday with quite a lot of…

Follow along for buildup and latest updates from Aston Villa vs Arsenal with our live blog, which will appear right below this short preview
Arsenal travel to Villa Park to face Aston Villa in the early kickoff on Saturday with quite a lot of…

Associated with TTP’s Intikhab Alam Group, Hammad Zahir was a wanted target killer, extortionist
A key commander of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan’s…


Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by comedones, papules, pustules, nodules, and, in some cases, scarring lesions.1 It is one of the most prevalent skin conditions globally, affecting approximately…

NuScale Power (SMR) has been on a choppy ride lately, with the share price down about 44% over the past month but still up roughly 21% year to date, leaving investors reassessing its long term nuclear story.
See our latest analysis for NuScale Power.
That sharp 30 day share price return of around negative 44% comes after a strong year to date gain and a near doubling three year total shareholder return. This suggests momentum has cooled as investors reassess execution risks around NuScale’s long term nuclear rollout.
If NuScale’s swings have you rethinking concentration in a single name, it could be worth scanning fast growing stocks with high insider ownership for other high conviction growth stories backed by committed insiders.
With shares still up strongly over three years yet trading almost 80 percent below analyst targets, investors face a pivotal question: is NuScale undervalued after the pullback, or already pricing in the next wave of nuclear growth?
With NuScale’s fair value pegged at about $38.35 versus a last close of $21.39, the most followed narrative paints a sizable upside gap.
With an NRC approved SMR technology and the commitment of over $2 billion towards its development and licensing, NuScale is uniquely positioned for immediate commercial deployment compared to competitors focused solely on demonstration plans. This potentially accelerates revenue growth once commercial operations commence.
Read the complete narrative.
Want to see what kind of revenue surge and margin shift could justify that gap, and why the future earnings multiple looks so aggressive? The full narrative unpacks a high speed revenue ramp, a sharp swing from deep losses toward industry style profitability, and a premium valuation normally reserved for market darlings. Curious how those moving parts add up to the projected fair value? Dive in to see the exact growth blueprint behind this call.
Result: Fair Value of $38.35 (UNDERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.
However, persistent delays in securing firm utility orders and potential dilutive funding needs around ENTRA1 could quickly challenge that bullish fair value case.
Find out about the key risks to this NuScale Power narrative.
While the popular narrative sees NuScale as 44.2% undervalued, our DCF model points the other way, with fair value near $3.17 versus a $21.39 share price. That implies NuScale could be significantly overvalued if lofty growth and margin assumptions fall short. Which future do you believe?

Collect/PA Real LifeAt the age of 12, Lucy Dare began to struggle with eating and excessive toilet use, but neither she nor her…

Getty ImagesAs a major car‑sharing scheme announces plans to close its London operations by the year’s end, some are concerned about the impact this will have on its users – and London’s emissions goals.
“If people like me didn’t have access to Zipcar, we would have to consider buying a car,” says John Sinha, who has been using the car-sharing service fortnightly for his business for about five years.
Mr Sinha, from Haringey, said he used the service to transport fragile objects, such as 3D printers, for his business.
“I normally use a bike to move around London, but sometimes, when carrying bulky or delicate objects, I need to have a car,” he said.
Mr Sinha points out: “If more people buy cars, it would mean more demand for parking spaces and more congestion, because people who have cars use them a lot more than people who are members of car clubs.”

Mr Sinha said the closure of the car club would be “very bad” for sustainability and has launched a petition calling on London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan to bring the car sharing service into public ownership.
“The thing about Zipcar, is it’s everywhere. You can find a car, you can book it on the app, there are even flex trips so you can take a car from one area and leave it in another area,” he said.
“It offers huge flexibility, and it’s almost as good as owning a car. Removing that is going to work against the stated policies of the mayor.”
Zipcar, a US-based company which is owned by car rental giant Avis Budget, said it had informed its UK members of the closure and had begun a formal consultation.
“As part of this proposal, new bookings in the UK will be suspended beyond 31 December 2025, subject to the outcome of the consultation,” Zipcar said.
“Zipcar UK will continue to operate as usual during this period,” a spokesperson said, adding it recognised the impact the proposal would have on its members, employees and partners.
Zipcar closed its operations in Oxford, Cambridge and Bristol last year to focus on its core London market, where it has more than 550,000 members.
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said he was aware the company had been struggling to make a profit in London.
Its decision was “perhaps sadly inevitable” and “not a complete shock”, he added.
“Car sharing is always going to be something of a difficult sell to a population that’s either very used to having all of the wonderful public transport that London benefits from, or they’ve got very used to having their own car,” he said.
However, Caroline Russell, leader of the City Hall Greens group, said she was “completely surprised by the suddenness of the announcement”.
She said car clubs were “part of the landscape of London” and called on the mayor and Transport for London (TfL) to have a “proper strategic think” about their value in meeting the mayor’s targets on congestion and air pollution.
Getty ImagesA spokesperson for the mayor of London said car clubs played an important role in reducing the need for private car ownership in London.
“TfL and the mayor are engaging with stakeholders to understand these changes and will be working with boroughs who manage the provision of car clubs to help ensure that [they] can remain an option for Londoners,” they said.
TfL said its “powers over car clubs” were limited, but it provided funding to boroughs that could be used to support car club bays across the capital.
Additional reporting by Chris Slegg