Blue Origin’s next space tourism mission will make history by carrying the first wheelchair user to space.
The company revealed the crew…

Blue Origin’s next space tourism mission will make history by carrying the first wheelchair user to space.
The company revealed the crew…

We present a novel model comparison to examine the challenges that changes in carbon-intensive energy prices pose for monetary policy. Our study focuses on the macroeconomic effects and monetary policy implications of both temporary and permanent carbon-intensive energy shocks. We use a set of institutional macroeconomic models, each of which is a comprehensive, multi-sector monetary framework.
The model comparison includes several large-scale macroeconomic models developed by several central banks and international organisations. These models are the SEEM model by the Central Bank of Chile, the EMuSe model by the Deutsche Bundesbank, the NAWM-E model by the European Central Bank, the C-EAGLE model by the Eurosystem, the E-QUEST model by the European Commission and the BIS-MS model by the Bank for International Settlements. Widely employed for policy analysis, these models incorporate a range of sectoral, nominal and real rigidities to assess the interactions between prices, sectoral dynamics and economic outcomes. A key commonality among them is their detailed representation of sectoral linkages, with particular emphasis on the energy sector.
Our examination of both temporary and permanent energy price increases uncovers significant insights into their economic impacts. We find that both types of shocks reduce output. The temporary price increase is inflationary, whereas the sign of the inflation response of a permanent price change depends on the underlying model assumptions and on the monetary policy response. Our study also reveals substantial commonalities across the models in terms of both quantitative and qualitative outcomes, while highlighting notable cross-country differences.
This paper presents a novel model comparison to examine the challenges posed by changes in carbon-intensive energy prices for monetary policy. The employed environmental monetary models have a detailed multi-sector structure. The comparison assesses the effects of both a temporary and a permanent energy price increase with a particular focus on the euro area and the United States. Temporary and permanent price shocks are both inflationary. However, the inflationary impact of the permanent shock depends on the underlying model assumptions and monetary policy response. The analysis also establishes that these models share large commonalities in their quantitative and qualitative results, while also pointing out cross-country differences.
JEL classification: C54, E52, H23, Q43
Keywords: climate change, monetary policy, multi-sector models, model comparison, DSGE models
The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the BIS.

TL;DR: The Pokémon TCG Mega Venusaur ex Premium Collection Box is available to preorder for $77.50 at Amazon. This item is set for release on Dec. 5.

LOUISVILLE, KY — Brown‑Forman Corporation (NYSE: BFA, BFB) reported financial results for its second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026, ended October 31, 2025. Second quarter reported net sales decreased 5%1 to $1.0 billion (-2% on an organic basis2) compared to the same prior-year period. In the quarter, reported operating income decreased 10% to $305 million (-9% on an organic basis) and diluted earnings per share decreased 14% to $0.47.
For the first six months of the fiscal year, the company’s reported net sales decreased 4% to $2.0 billion (flat on an organic basis) compared to the same prior-year period. First half reported operating income decreased 9% to $565 million (-4% on an organic basis) and diluted earnings per share decreased 13% to $0.83.
Lawson Whiting, Brown‑Forman’s President and Chief Executive Officer shared, “Our second quarter results reflect a continuation of the themes we saw in the first quarter, and the first half of the year unfolded largely as we expected. While the operating environment continues to be challenging, our team remains resilient and focused on executing our plans. Based on this performance and our visibility into the remainder of the year, we are pleased to reaffirm our fiscal year guidance.”
First Half of Fiscal 2026 Highlights
First Half of Fiscal 2026 Brand Results
First Half of Fiscal 2026 Market Results
First Half of Fiscal 2026 Other P&L Items
First Half of Fiscal 2026 Financial Stewardship
On November 19, 2025, the Brown‑Forman Board of Directors approved an increase of 2% to the quarterly cash dividend from $0.2265 per share to $0.2310 per share on its Class A and Class B Common Stock. The dividend is payable on January 2, 2026, to stockholders of record on December 5, 2025. Brown‑Forman, a member of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, has paid regular quarterly cash dividends for 82 consecutive years and has increased the regular dividend for 42 consecutive years.
As announced on October 2, 2025, the Brown‑Forman Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of$400 million (exclusive of brokerage fees and excise taxes) of outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock from October 1, 2025, through October 1, 2026, subject to market and other conditions. As of October 31, 2025, $301 million remained available under the program.
In addition, cash flows from operations grew $163 million to $292 million, primarily reflecting disciplined working capital management. Free cash flow increased $179 million to $236 million, reflecting strong operating cash flow generation and lower capital expenditure needs.
Fiscal 2026 Outlook
We continue to anticipate the operating environment for fiscal 2026 to be challenging, with low visibility due to macroeconomic and geopolitical volatility as we face headwinds from consumer uncertainty and lower non-branded sales of used barrels. We remain focused on building our business for the long term and navigating the current environment at pace with strategic initiatives in fiscal 2026 that we believe will unlock future growth led by the significant evolution of our U.S. distribution, the restructuring initiative, and meaningful new product innovation.
Accordingly, we reiterate the following expectation for fiscal 2026:
The estimated capital expenditures range has been updated to $110 to $120 million from $125 to $135 million.
Click here for the full financial results.
Conference Call Details
Brown‑Forman will host a conference call to discuss these results at 10:00 a.m. (ET) today. A live audio broadcast of the conference call, and the accompanying presentation slides, will be available via Brown‑Forman’s website, brown-forman.com, through a link to “Investors/Events & Presentations.” A digital audio recording of the conference call and the presentation slides will also be posted on the website and will be available for at least 30 days following the conference call.
Brown‑Forman Corporation is a global leader in the spirits industry, responsibly building exceptional beverage alcohol brands for more than 155 years. Headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, we are guided by our founding promise, “Nothing Better in the Market.” Our premium portfolio includes the Jack Daniel’s Family of Brands, Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, New Mix, el Jimador, Herradura, The Glendronach, Glenglassaugh, Benriach, Diplomático Rum, Gin Mare, Fords Gin, Chambord, and Slane. With approximately 5,000 employees worldwide, we proudly share our passion for fine-quality spirits in more than 170 countries. Learn more at brown-forman.com and stay connected with us on LinkedIn, Instagram, and X.
Contacts:
Elizabeth Conway, Director, External Communications
Sue Perram, Vice President, Director, Investor Relations
Important Information on Forward-Looking Statements:
This press release contains statements, estimates, and projections that are “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. Words such as “aim,” “ambition,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “envision,” “estimate,” “expect,” “expectation,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “see,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar words indicate forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors (many beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
For further information on these and other risks, please see the risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our 2025 Form 10-K, and those described from time to time in our reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.
