Author: admin

  • AI start-ups in the UK need more than money

    AI start-ups in the UK need more than money

    Stay informed with free updates

    The writer is co-founder of BlankPage Capital, co-founder of Graphcore and author of ‘How AI Thinks’

    It was a small company based in London that started the race to build the world’s most advanced artificial intelligence. DeepMind, founded in 2010, pioneered deep-learning AI and is working towards human-level AI. But its acquisition by Google in 2014 means that the company’s breakthroughs are largely benefiting the US, not the UK. As the AI race intensifies, the UK needs to find a way to build its own large-scale tech companies.

    The usual conversation is about ways that the country can bridge the funding gap and encourage innovation. But this is not where the problem lies. The UK is world class at creating technology companies, often via spinouts from our universities. In 2023, according to figures provided by database company Dealroom to investor Phoenix Court, Bay Area seed and early-stage companies (those raising between $1mn and $15mn in funding) raised $4.5bn. The equivalent companies in the UK raised $4.1bn. So the UK is not far behind at the earliest start-up stage. This first link in our innovation ecosystem is not broken.

    Yet by the final start-up stage, where these companies need to raise $100mn or more in funding to drive growth, US businesses are way ahead, raising five times as much as their UK counterparts. What is it that goes wrong in between?

    The answer lies in the all-important middle stage, known as early growth, when companies have built a team and a product and are trying to expand into global businesses. In 2023, Bay Area early-growth stage companies received nearly two times the funding of their UK counterparts — at just under $14bn compared to just over $7bn.  

    DeepMind was passing through exactly this growth stage when the co-founders decided to sell their business and gain access to the resources that were available as a division of Google. Last year, I sold my AI chipmaker Graphcore to Japan’s SoftBank for exactly the same reason. 

    UK policymakers are focused on funding, pouring energy into reforming capital markets, corralling pension funds to invest in UK companies and putting more state funds into venture capital — including the new £500mn Sovereign AI Unit announced in July.  

    This is all helpful. But the answer isn’t money — or rather, it isn’t just money. Yes, access to capital is critical. But to attract more conservative, late-stage, global private capital, UK tech companies must be mature enough to show commercial traction, the potential for massive revenue growth and the ability to generate future profits. What is holding them back is a lack of the right kind of support to connect their businesses to customers and to turn them from technology start-ups into true commercial entities.

    If your company has access to Silicon Valley investors and your early-growth stage funding is led by Benchmark Capital, Andreessen Horowitz or one of the other leading tech VC firms, you get more than money. These firms will provide access to senior leaders at the biggest tech companies, many of which they funded. You will receive help from partners who built their own global businesses and are highly connected to the market.

    This is the type of support we must offer in the UK by replicating the Silicon Valley ecosystem of specialised support for early-growth companies. Founders who have built their own tech companies must pass on their experience. VCs must double down on this part of the innovation ecosystem and help early-growth tech businesses win deals in international markets and connect with expert mentors who have scaled and exited major companies.  

    The UK has the potential to lead in AI, just as we do in fintech. But to do so, we need to build a new base of VCs. It is their expertise that will help our most promising tech companies find global success.

    Continue Reading

  • Molly McNearney in WIE Keynote Speech: ‘Fight for What’s Right’

    Molly McNearney in WIE Keynote Speech: ‘Fight for What’s Right’

    Molly McNearney says she “naively” assumed that the First Amendment right to freedom of speech was something she didn’t really have to think about — “until Sept. 16, 2025.”

    The following day, ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel Live!

    Continue Reading

  • OpenAI loses fight to keep ChatGPT logs secret in copyright case – Reuters

    1. OpenAI loses fight to keep ChatGPT logs secret in copyright case  Reuters
    2. OpenAI desperate to avoid explaining why it deleted pirated book datasets  Ars Technica
    3. OpenAI Loses Key Discovery Battle as It Cedes Ground to Authors in AI Lawsuits  The Hollywood Reporter
    4. OpenAI Ordered to Share Documents in Copyright Lawsuit  Legal Reader
    5. US judge declines to reconsider order that OpenAI produce 20m ChatGPT conversations  MLex

    Continue Reading

  • A pediatrician’s perspective on waning global support for vaccination – Doctors Without Borders – USA

    1. A pediatrician’s perspective on waning global support for vaccination  Doctors Without Borders – USA
    2. Giving thanks for the vaccines that protect us  galvnews.com
    3. Opinion: Vaccines do more than improve our health  Concord Monitor
    4. Letters: There’s…

    Continue Reading

  • Release candidates of iOS 26.2, macOS 26.2 now available – AppleInsider

    1. Release candidates of iOS 26.2, macOS 26.2 now available  AppleInsider
    2. iOS 26.2 will add three new ways to customize your iPhone  9to5Mac
    3. Here’s everything coming (and probably not coming) from Apple in December  Macworld
    4. Apple CarPlay getting a…

    Continue Reading

  • The Lawsuit Tearing Apart Two Art-Dealing Brothers

    The Lawsuit Tearing Apart Two Art-Dealing Brothers

    If you have recently heard from or done business with a New York art gallery that has Aicon as part of its name, you may want to take a closer look at the dealer’s website or letterhead and make sure you know exactly who you are dealing with….

    Continue Reading

  • Daily glass of orange juice could boost heart health by changing how thousands of genes within immune cells work: Study – livemint.com

    1. Daily glass of orange juice could boost heart health by changing how thousands of genes within immune cells work: Study  livemint.com
    2. Try out THIS drink to reduce cholestrol levels in your body  Jang
    3. Cut down blood pressure, inflammation and…

    Continue Reading

  • Quantum computers get a boost from a tiny material tweak

    Quantum computers get a boost from a tiny material tweak

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A small, counterintuitive tweak to advanced materials can improve how quantum computers hand off information inside their systems, making them more efficient, reliable and scalable.

    In a paper…

    Continue Reading

  • International Bobsleigh & Skeleton Federation: Upcoming ITA webinar designed for athletes aiming for Milano Cortina 2026

    The next monthly webinar of the International Testing Agency (ITA) on 10 December will be targeting athletes trying to qualify for the upcoming Milano Cortina 2026 Olympic Winter Games, as well as their support personnel.

    What are the…

    Continue Reading

  • helpful, honest, harmless and hulking

    helpful, honest, harmless and hulking

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

    They grow up so fast. Anthropic, a maker of artificial intelligence models and rival to OpenAI, has hired lawyers ahead of an initial public offering that could value it at $350bn next year. By that point the company would have reached the not-at-all-grand age of five.

    That makes it a pretty good example of AI companies’ turbocharged growth. As a comparison, Google went public six years after its founding, achieving a valuation of about $23bn. Facebook took eight years to spring into public markets with roughly a $100bn price tag. The geriatric Microsoft waited 11 years and debuted in 1986 at around $800mn.

    Behind the hype, at least, is a business. Anthropic’s main product is its chatbot Claude. That generates revenue, if not yet profit: Anthropic has projected that it could make $70bn in sales by 2028, The Information has reported. That would put its mooted valuation at five times that sum. Meta went public in 2012 at, with hindsight, a multiple of six times its three-year-hence sales; China’s Alibaba at seven times and Palantir at 10.

    When investors do get the chance to buy stock in Anthropic directly, joining existing backers Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Nvidia, they will be benchmarking it particularly closely with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, whose latest valuation of $500bn is also five times 2028 projections.

    Who wins the bake-off depends on what flavours an investor prefers. Anthropic seems more popular with companies, with a 32 per cent share of the “enterprise” market as of the end of July, according to Menlo Ventures — which it should be noted is an Anthropic investor. That’s helpful, because businesses are more likely to pay up for AI than consumers.

    Anthropic is also a more narrow business. It builds models, and that’s about it. OpenAI, meanwhile, is investing in data centres, pocket-sized devices, other companies’ shares and its own web browser. Some might call that sprawl; a venture capitalist might be more likely to call it “full stack”. Seen that way, Anthropic might more resemble a Palantir or a Salesforce, where OpenAI has shades of Google parent Alphabet or Microsoft.

    Perhaps the toughest thing to value is what Anthropic might see as its greatest asset: its principles. The company was founded to be a safer alternative to OpenAI, building bots that are “helpful, honest and harmless”. Indeed, the Center for AI Safety deems Anthropic’s products the least likely among major models to “overtly lie” or furnish answers to “hazardous expert-level virology queries”.

    Whether investors will pay a premium for that — or instead demand a discount — remains to be seen. In the meantime, much can happen. By the time it goes public, if it does, AI may have taken another leap forward, or tripped on its own hype. It’s therefore worth thinking about how Anthropic might justify a $350bn valuation — while also being prepared to tear those assumptions up and start again.

    john.foley@ft.com

    Continue Reading