BERLIN — The Swedish government promised on Friday to fight the sale of childlike sex dolls online after instances of such commerce had been reported earlier in the country.
“I think I react on behalf of all parents when I say that, as a mother, your heart really breaks watching these images and pictures of these dolls,” Sweden’s Minister for Social Services, Camilla Waltersson Grönvall, told The Associated Press.
The Swedish government wants “to make sure these products cannot any more be sold and bought anywhere,” she said.
She spoke after a meeting which the Swedish government convened on Friday “in response to several notable cases of e-commerce companies selling childlike sex dolls,” according to a statement by her ministry. Child protection groups, online vendors and government agencies participated.
The online platforms described the measures they are taking to make sure these kinds of products are no longer sold online, Waltersson Grönvall said.
Asked whether the ministry considers those measures sufficient, Waltersson Grönvall said: “I have been very clear that we will follow this very closely and we will not hesitate to take further action, which might involve further legislation if that is considered necessary.”
She said the government was preparing a strategy on protecting children from violence, which included steps to prevent sexual and online abuse.
The online sale of the disputed dolls in Sweden came to the public’s attention after the child protection group ChildX filed a police report against Amazon and several other e-commerce platforms earlier this month over the sale of sex dolls with a clear childlike appearance.
“The products, approximately one meter in length, are often dressed in school uniforms and marketed in a sexualized context,” the group said. “Swedish legislation prohibits material that portrays children in a sexualized manner. The sale or distribution of lifelike child-like sex dolls may thus fall under criminal provisions related to child sexual exploitation.”
ChildX Secretary General Ida Östensson, also speaking by phone to the AP, said that “our police complaint against Amazon and other sites for selling child-like sex dolls, together with public advocacy, led to the removal of these listings on Amazon.”
“We are taking this step because these products are designed to sexualize children,” said Östensson. “Their open sale and marketing fuel a culture that normalizes the sexual abuse of children. This is unacceptable. Children should never be commodified for sexual purposes.”
When reached by email, online vendor Amazon said it did not have anything to share beyond what it had previously told other media, which was that the company would attend Friday’s meeting and had taken products that had been flagged offline.
“We have strict policies and guidelines in the segment of adult products and we have always strictly prohibited child pornography,” an Amazon spokesperson was quoted by French daily Le Monde on Nov. 12.
In November, France’s government said it was moving toward suspending access to the Shein online marketplace until it proves its content conforms to French law, after authorities found illegal weapons and child-like sex dolls for sale on the fast-fashion giant’s website.
___
Claudia Ciobanu reported from from Warsaw, Poland.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) can present uniquely in patients with skin of color, making timely recognition and effective management more challenging for clinicians. Classic signs such as erythema or inflammation may appear muted, harder to detect, or…
In a recent discussion with Contemporary OB/GYN, Tony Anderson, DHSc, ELD, founder of IVF Academy USA, examined how workforce shortages in embryology and the growing role of artificial intelligence (AI) are shaping the present and future of in…
HOBOKEN, N.J., Nov. 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — eMazzanti Technologies, a leading Managed Services Provider (MSP), is pleased to announce the launch of eBot, an intelligent AI-powered assistant designed to revolutionize IT…
When Empa researchers wheeled the EURECA satellite into their high-energy X-ray facility in Dübendorf, they faced an opportunity that comes along perhaps once in a generation. Very few satellites survive a mission and make it home intact….
The Spanish football giant Barcelona has told fans it has “no connection whatsoever” with the digital coin offered by its new crypto partner, following criticism over the deal.
Clubs often pick up sponsors in unusual areas to bring in extra money – with Arsenal bringing in Persil as its fabric care partner in 2023, and Kellogg’s becoming Manchester City’s breakfast cereal partner that same year.
But far less is known about Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP), which signed a three-year sponsorship deal in mid-November with Barcelona.
ZKP then announced a cryptocurrency, prompting concerns Barcelona fans could be led to invest in it – leading the club to distance itself from the coin.
“The club has no responsibility for, or involvement in, the issuance or management of this token, nor does it use the associated technology,” the club said in a statement on its website.
Little is known about ZKP, which also announced a similar sponsorship deal with Australian rugby league team Dolphins in early November.
On its website, it says the project has been founded and developed by “a pseudonymous collective” based across “multiple jurisdictions”.
In other words, the firm is not revealing the names or locations of those behind it.
University of Sussex professor Carol Alexander said the Barcelona brand gives enormous visibility to crypto firms like ZKP – but there is “substantial risk for supporters who buy the tokens”.
“Sponsorship creates an aura of credibility, even when the underlying project is opaque,” she told the BBC – saying this meant fans and supporters should be “very cautious”.
“Before buying any crypto asset they should ask who controls it, where the documentation is, and what recourse they have if it fails,” she said.
“With ZKP, none of those answers are clear.”
‘Substantial risk’
Details about ZKP are few and far between, with the firm even claiming it has no single headquarter.
But the Financial Times reported an earlier version of the company’s terms listed an office located in Apia, the capital of Samoa.
The ZKP name is also the term used to describe a type of technology designed to enhance the privacy of a blockchain – a digital record of transactions which underpins cryptocurrencies.
Its deal with Barcelona comes as the football club is reportedly facing an uphill struggle to raise revenue and relieve its debt.
“Barcelona’s finances in recent years have been perilous, so the club appears to have adopted a strategy of ‘bank the money first, ask questions later’,” said football finance expert and author Kieran Maguire.
He told the BBC “crypto products seek legitimacy and normalisation from those that speculate on their products”.
To partner with a football club, particularly one as well-known as Barcelona, “helps achieve those ambitions,” he said.
And former Barcelona youth player Xavier Vilajoana, who reportedly is bidding to be its next president, called on the club to clarify how the deal had come about in a post on X.
He also asked the club about ZKP’s relationship with self-proclaimed misogynist Andrew Tate – one of only three X accounts the crypto firm follows on the platform.
Australian consumers are paying a premium for “mineral” sunscreens that contain almost identical chemicals to cheaper varieties, new testing has revealed.
The University of New South Wales’ school of chemistry tested 10 sunscreens, including Invisible Zinc children’s sunscreen and a Naked Sundays skin tint that retails for $58 – both marketed as mineral sunscreens.
Mineral sunscreens, which often contain zinc oxide, are usually marketed as more “natural” and gentler on the skin, and are sometimes described as reflecting UV.
They also tend to be much more expensive than generic supermarket or pharmacy products.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
The study found that while all 10 products exceeded their sun protection factor (SPF) claims, some of the protection provided by the Invisible Zinc and Naked Sundays products actually came from chemicals not identified on the bottle.
The researchers found a range of products contain chemical filters which aren’t listed as active ingredients, with prices for some mineral sunscreens as high as $82 for a 50ml bottle.
“If a sunscreen is giving the illusion that it only contains so-called mineral components … it’s very likely it contains almost identical stuff as other sunscreens and that’s what makes them work so well,” UNSW Prof Jon Beves said.
Brands ‘exploiting a loophole’ to market sunscreen
Sunscreens typically work by creating a barrier between the skin and the sun’s rays by absorbing UV radiation.
The UNSW study found that while zinc oxide reflects UV, it acts similarly to “chemical” filters, via absorption.
The researchers also found that some brands include other UV-absorbing chemicals in mineral sunscreens, without fully disclosing this to consumers.
Most sunscreens in Australia are registered with the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), which requires the submission of SPF test results and a list of ingredients.
But some do not need TGA registration, because brands describe them as cosmetic products, meaning they are subject to fewer regulations and do not need to disclose any ingredients.
Unregulated chemicals in a third of ‘mineral’ sunscreens
A broader review by the UNSW researchers, examining 143 sunscreens registered with the TGA that list only mineral filters such as zinc oxide as active ingredients, found more than a third also contain unregulated chemical filters.
Nearly 25% of the products contain butyloctyl salicylate and ethylhexyl methoxycrylene, chemical filters that protect from UV radiation but do not have to be listed as “active” ingredients with the TGA because they aren’t regulated.
The UNSW’s Dr Anna Wang said these chemicals are used to make products feel nicer on the skin, but they also absorb UV in a similar manner to the common sunscreen ingredients ethylhexyl salicylate and octocrylene. Both ingredients are regulated by the TGA, making them subject to safety reviews.
New tests reveal ‘hidden’ chemicals boosting SPF
To test the sunscreens, the UNSW scientists spread films of each product on quartz, a type of glass that does not absorb UV on its own.
They used a device that could pass UV light through each sunscreen’s film to see how much light was absorbed and reflected, and worked out the patterns that zinc oxide showed compared with “chemical” filters.
In the case of the Invisible Zinc Junior Mineral Sunscreen SPF50, the UNSW testing found zinc oxide wasn’t the only ingredient providing sun protection, despite the company advertising otherwise.
On the TGA register, its manufacturer, iNova Pharmaceuticals claims, zinc oxide is the product’s only “active” ingredient. It lists butylocyl salicylate and ethylhexyl methoxycrylene as “other” ingredients.
The UNSW research found there was “no doubt” these other chemicals contributed to the sunscreen’s SPF performance.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
On its website, Invisible Zinc claims the sunscreen contains “no chemical UV filters”.
An iNova spokesperson said the assertion that the chemicals were hidden was “categorically false”, because they were disclosed in the product’s TGA listing.
“It is true that both [butyloctyl salicylate and ethylhexyl methoxycrylene] absorb UV, however, that is not their primary function in our formulation,” they said.
“We stand by the claims associated with Invisible Zinc Junior Mineral Sunscreen, particularly that micronized zinc oxide is the only active ingredient.”
Naked Sundays did not respond to Guardian Australia’s requests for comment.
But the UNSW researchers said its BeautyScreen SPF50 Peptide Foundation Tint returned similar results to those of Invisible Zinc’s.
On its website, the product lists zinc oxide 12% as its only active ingredient. It names butyloctyl salicylate as an “inactive” ingredient, but the UNSW researchers said this chemical was “definitely boosting the SPF” of the product.
Because it is considered a cosmetic the product does not need to be registered with the TGA or list its ingredients on the regulator’s website.
Sunscreen industry under a microscope
The UNSW research was conducted over several months after the consumer advocacy group Choice prompted a scandal in June with its own investigation into popular sunscreen brands’ SPF claims.
The industry has previously run on an honour system: sunscreen brands “self-certify” they have tested SPF claims, and the TGA does not usually do its own testing.
But after the Choice investigation, the TGA recalled a range of sunscreens and is considering changes to the way it regulates the industry, including how products should be tested.
The UNSW researchers said their calculations were a “best-case scenario” because their testing could not account for the potential interaction between the sunscreens and skin, especially if it were absorbed or washed off.
The TGA has said, however, that variability between people presents issues with testing sunscreen on human skin. The regulator is considering a shift to in vitro SPF testing, away from the accepted method of using human volunteers.
The TGA has been contacted for comment.
Quick Guide
Contact Guardian Australia
Show
If you have something to share about this story, you can contact the Guardian Australia news teams using one of the following methods.
Secure Messaging in the Guardian app
The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.
If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.
Email
– If you don’t need strong security you can write to a Guardian Australia journalist using the details here. Click on a person to see their details.
– For end to end encrypted email you can create a free Protonmail account and email gaus.contact@protonmail.com.
Messaging apps
You can also use the encrypted messaging apps Signal or WhatsApp to message us at +61 490 758 250.
SecureDrop and other secure methods
If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.
Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
