Wondering whether Nutanix’s current share price is a bargain or a warning sign? If you’re curious about the true value behind the ticker, you’re not alone.
The stock recently tumbled, dropping 20% over the last week and over 30% in the past month. This could signal growing volatility or shifting market sentiment.
Analysts and investors have been buzzing after Nutanix confirmed new technology partnerships and announced an expanded lineup of cloud solutions. These developments help explain some of the intense recent price movements. Market watchers are closely following how these changes may unlock further growth or introduce fresh risks.
Our initial pass at valuation checks finds Nutanix scoring 3 out of 6. This suggests the company is undervalued by three measures but is not a simple story. Next, we’ll dig into how different valuation approaches view Nutanix, and why the best judgment might come from looking beyond just numbers.
Find out why Nutanix’s -27.5% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers.
A Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model estimates a company’s true value by projecting its future free cash flows and discounting them back to today’s dollars. This approach helps investors understand what a business is fundamentally worth by focusing on its ability to generate cash over time.
For Nutanix, the latest report puts annual Free Cash Flow at $773.8 Million. Analysts forecast a steady climb in the coming years, with projected Free Cash Flow reaching $1.05 Billion by 2028. While only the first five years of estimates come directly from analysts, further projections through 2035 are extrapolated. This provides a longer-term perspective on the company’s earning power.
Based on this model, Nutanix’s intrinsic value comes out to $76.06 per share, which means the current share price is trading at a 36.4% discount. This suggests the market may be underestimating the company’s growth potential or overreacting to recent volatility.
Result: UNDERVALUED
Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Nutanix is undervalued by 36.4%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 926 more undervalued stocks based on cash flows.
NTNX Discounted Cash Flow as at Nov 2025
Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Nutanix.
For companies that are now profitable, the Price-to-Earnings (PE) ratio is one of the most fitting ways to compare valuation. This metric reveals how much investors are willing to pay for a dollar of current earnings, making it especially relevant for mature businesses generating consistent profits.
However, what counts as a “normal” or “fair” PE ratio varies widely. Factors such as future earnings growth, business risk, and the strength of a company’s profit margins all influence where this number should fall. Higher-growth and lower-risk companies often command higher PE multiples, while companies facing more uncertainty trade at lower ratios.
Nutanix’s current PE ratio stands at 59.35x, notably above the Software industry average of 29.19x and higher than its peer group, which sits at 37.96x. This might initially signal that the market expects Nutanix to continue delivering exceptional growth or that it is priced at a premium.
To help cut through the noise, Simply Wall St has developed the “Fair Ratio,” a proprietary benchmark for the PE multiple that weighs Nutanix’s individual characteristics including its growth outlook, profitability, risk profile, industry trends, and market capitalization. Unlike a broad comparison to the average peer or sector, the Fair Ratio offers a tailored reference point and reflects Nutanix’s unique position.
For Nutanix, the Fair Ratio is estimated at 47.71x. Since the company’s actual PE ratio is considerably higher, the stock appears to be trading above what its fundamentals might justify, even after accounting for its favorable characteristics.
Result: OVERVALUED
NasdaqGS:NTNX PE Ratio as at Nov 2025
PE ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Discover 1434 companies where insiders are betting big on explosive growth.
Earlier we mentioned that there’s an even better way to understand valuation, so let’s introduce you to Narratives. A Narrative is your personal investment “story” for a company—your view of its future, paired with the numbers you believe matter most, such as fair value, future revenue, earnings, and profit margins. Narratives connect what’s happening at Nutanix to a real financial forecast, providing a clear link between events, price targets, and the company’s long-term outlook.
On Simply Wall St’s Community page, Narratives are an easy-to-use tool trusted by millions of investors to express their outlook, compare it to others, and make smarter decisions. They help you decide when to buy or sell by matching your estimated fair value (and what you see as likely business outcomes) against today’s share price, without the need for complicated models or spreadsheets.
Because Narratives update dynamically with every new earnings report, news headline, or partnership announcement, your perspective always stays relevant. For example, some investors currently believe Nutanix deserves a price as high as $95 based on dominant AI-driven growth and expanding market share, while the most skeptical peg fair value closer to $71 due to margin pressure and competitive headwinds. Your Narrative can reflect your own logic and help you act confidently, even when the market is divided.
Do you think there’s more to the story for Nutanix? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
NasdaqGS:NTNX Community Fair Values as at Nov 2025
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include NTNX.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Ever wondered if Primo Brands is genuinely undervalued, or if there’s something the market knows that you don’t? If you’re after more than just hype, you’re in the right place.
The stock has had quite a ride lately, up 2.3% this week, but still down 30.7% over the last month and nearly 50% year-to-date. That kind of movement is bound to spark questions about long-term value and shifting market sentiment.
Recent headlines have focused on major industry partnerships and strategic investments that could reshape Primo Brands’ growth trajectory. These moves have fueled discussions about new market opportunities and raised the stakes for what investors expect next.
Primo Brands currently scores a 5 out of 6 on our valuation checks, signaling it’s undervalued in nearly every area we monitor. Before we dive into those different valuation methods, stick around for an even more insightful way to approach valuation later in the article.
Find out why Primo Brands’s -44.4% return over the last year is lagging behind its peers.
A Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model estimates a company’s intrinsic value by forecasting its future cash flows and discounting them back to today’s value. This approach helps investors understand what a business is worth based on its ability to generate cash in the years ahead.
For Primo Brands, the DCF uses a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity model. The company reported $275.3 million in Free Cash Flow over the last twelve months. Analysts provide projected cash flows up to 2029, when estimates reach $1,080.5 million. Beyond analysts’ projections, future cash flows are extrapolated, resulting in a projected 10-year Free Cash Flow of $1.31 billion by 2035.
When discounted back to present value, these cash flows yield an estimated intrinsic value of $71.46 per share. With the stock currently trading at a 78.1% discount to this intrinsic value, Primo Brands appears significantly undervalued based on DCF analysis.
Result: UNDERVALUED
Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Primo Brands is undervalued by 78.1%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 926 more undervalued stocks based on cash flows.
PRMB Discounted Cash Flow as at Nov 2025
Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Primo Brands.
The Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio is a useful measure for valuing companies, especially those where earnings may not fully capture the underlying business potential or are impacted by recent investments and changes. For profitable companies like Primo Brands, the P/S metric offers valuable insight because it connects market value directly to top-line revenue, giving investors a clearer sense of sales-driven valuation, regardless of short-term profit swings.
Growth expectations and company risk both influence what investors consider a fair or normal P/S ratio. Businesses with stronger growth prospects or lower risk profiles often justify higher P/S multiples. Slower growers or riskier firms typically trade at lower multiples.
Currently, Primo Brands trades at a P/S ratio of 0.89x. This is significantly lower than both the beverage industry average of 2.27x and the peer group’s average of 3.66x.
Simply Wall St’s proprietary “Fair Ratio” goes beyond simple averages and provides a tailored benchmark based on factors such as Primo Brands’ growth outlook, risk profile, profit margin, industry, and market capitalization. For Primo Brands, the Fair Ratio is calculated at 1.05x. This is a more holistic, company-specific measure and can offer a more relevant benchmark than broad industry or peer comparisons since it incorporates the nuances that matter most to investors.
With Primo Brands’ actual P/S ratio at 0.89x and the Fair Ratio at 1.05x, the difference suggests the stock is somewhat undervalued according to this approach.
Result: UNDERVALUED
NYSE:PRMB PS Ratio as at Nov 2025
PS ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Discover 1434 companies where insiders are betting big on explosive growth.
Earlier we mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation, so let’s introduce you to Narratives. A Narrative is simply your story behind the numbers. It is your personal perspective on where a company is headed, based on your assumptions about its future revenue, earnings, and margins. Narratives connect what you believe about a business with financial forecasts and translate your story into an estimated fair value for the stock.
On Simply Wall St’s Community page, investors can easily build and share Narratives in just a few minutes. This is an accessible, dynamic tool trusted by millions. Comparing your Narrative’s fair value to the current share price can help you decide whether it is time to buy or sell, bringing your conviction to real investment actions.
Narratives are continuously updated as news or fresh earnings reports emerge, keeping your view aligned with the latest information. For example, one investor might see Primo Brands as worth $45 per share due to caution about growth, while another’s Narrative values it at $75 based on optimism about new partnerships. Narratives let you bring your own outlook into the investing process and join the community conversation with confidence.
Do you think there’s more to the story for Primo Brands? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
NYSE:PRMB Community Fair Values as at Nov 2025
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include PRMB.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
KARACHI: Pakistan has entered the final days of a nationwide immunization campaign aiming to protect more than 35 million children against measles, rubella and polio, with health officials reporting that over 13.6 million children have already…
A key regulatory measure to safeguard insurers’ solvency is the implementation of a risk-based solvency (RBS) regime. Such a regime is designed to incentivise insurers to hold sufficient capital to cover their risks, enabling them to meet their obligations to policyholders, even in adverse circumstances. Transitioning to an RBS regime represents a significant undertaking, involving comprehensive regulatory reforms, extensive training and capacity-building for both supervisors and industry, effective project planning and continuous engagement with stakeholders.
Many emerging market and developing economies are embarking on this journey, which often spans several years. Against this backdrop, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) published the Guidance on transitioning to a risk-based solvency (RBS) regime to provide a structured roadmap for supervisors and policymakers to establish a robust RBS regime.
What is an RBS regime?
An RBS regime is a regulatory framework that requires insurers to maintain a sufficient level of capital that is proportionate to cover their risk profiles and withstand financial difficulties, supported by a sound corporate governance framework. An RBS regime is composed of three types of key elements:
Quantitative elements: These elements include valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities, treatment of investments, the calculation of capital requirements, recognition of capital resources and the resulting solvency ratio.
Qualitative elements: These elements focus on the governance frameworks in insurers, including oversight roles and responsibilities, and governance structures such as the risk management system, internal control system and control functions.
Reporting and disclosure elements: These elements encompass supervisory reporting and public disclosure requirements of both quantitative and qualitative information.
An RBS regime can take many forms, involving different combinations of these elements and varying in complexity. The final form of an RBS regime will depend on the characteristics of the jurisdiction, such as its economic activity and conditions, the development of financial markets, demographics and culture, the size and sophistication of its insurance sector, and the technical capacity of the supervisor.
Benefits and challenges of transitioning to an RBS regime
Supervisory authorities may choose to transition to an RBS regime for several reasons. Such a framework can enhance the protection of policyholders by providing supervisors with a deeper understanding of insurers’ business models and risk profiles. It also supports the development of insurance markets through proportional application of regulatory requirements based on the size and complexity of insurers, allowing new entrants to gradually meet requirements as they grow. Additionally, an RBS regime contributes to financial stability when insurers hold sufficient capital relative to their risks, enabling early risk identification and mitigation to prevent the build-up of systemic risk. Finally, aligning with international standards and best practices helps position a jurisdiction as an attractive and secure environment for international insurers.
Implementing an RBS regime involves significant challenges. These include high implementation costs, such as IT upgrades, developing actuarial expertise, training and the development of robust data management systems. It also requires cultural shifts within supervisory authorities and the insurance sector, fostering a risk-based mindset and aligning practices with the new regulatory framework. Additionally, supervisors and insurers may need time to adjust their governance and organisational structures.
Key considerations for transition
Transitioning to an RBS regime is a significant step that requires a long-term perspective. The complexity of an RBS regime should align with a jurisdiction’s characteristics. In some cases, other market development initiatives may take priority. The following are key considerations when transitioning to an RBS regime:
Tailoring to the jurisdictional context – Transition strategies should reflect economic conditions, market maturity, demographic and cultural factors, and the sophistication of the insurance sector and the technical capacity of the supervisor.
Long-term project planning – Implementing RBS typically spans medium- to long-term horizons. Careful planning, strong governance, transparent timelines, sound project risk assessment and management, and clear communication plans are recommended.
Implementation approaches – There are multiple ways to structure the implementation of an RBS regime. Jurisdictions may choose a conceptually led approach, where the initial consultation focuses on the objectives and design of the regime, or a legislation-led approach, where the legal framework is established first and technical details are added later. Jurisdictions will also have to decide to adopt a phased approach, where components of the RBS regime are introduced gradually (eg starting with qualitative elements like governance, followed by quantitative requirements), or an approach where all elements are implemented simultaneously.
Capacity-building – Investment in human resources, particularly actuaries, risk managers and IT professionals, is critical. Supervisors should also build internal expertise to oversee RBS processes effectively.
Stakeholder engagement – Engaging insurers, government bodies and other stakeholders through consultations, field testing and workshops can provide transparency, buy-in and smooth implementation.
Practical aspects of RBS regime implementation
Implementing an RBS regime begins with careful scoping, securing endorsement from supervisory leaders and governments, and establishing dedicated teams and governance structures to manage the transition. A comprehensive project plan defines rules of conduct, milestones, communication strategies and risk management processes. Key design choices, such as whether to legislate early or later and whether to phase in reforms or adopt a comprehensive rollout, shape the pace of implementation. Stakeholder engagement, particularly with the insurance industry, is critical: insurers contribute data, participate in consultations and support field testing, which validates design decisions and ensures the readiness of systems before full adoption.
The transition often requires legislative reforms across multiple policy domains and a cultural shift among supervisors and insurers towards proactive, risk-based thinking. Jurisdictional experiences show that implementation generally takes five to 10 years or more, with success depending on sustained political support, transparent communication and a pragmatic balance between ambition and market realities.
Technical aspects of RBS regime implementation
The technical foundation of an RBS regime lies in building a coherent solvency framework that balances international standards with local realities. Central to this is the total balance sheet approach, which requires supervisors to specify valuation approaches, define qualifying capital resources and establish capital requirements anchored in prescribed and minimum capital requirement control levels to ensure adequate policyholder protection. These quantitative rules are complemented by qualitative requirements, such as governance, enterprise risk management and own risk and solvency assessment, that enable insurers to identify, measure and manage risks effectively. Disclosure requirements further enhance transparency and promote market discipline.
Technical design involves key decisions, including whether to base valuation on financial reporting standards, like International Financial Reporting Standard 17 – Insurance Contracts, or develop bespoke solvency balance sheets; how to calibrate capital charges for insurance, market, credit and operational risks; and how to aggregate them consistently. Proportionality is critical, particularly for emerging market economies, where simplified approaches, phased calibration and transition periods may be necessary to maintain credibility without undermining market growth.
This Executive Summary and related tutorials are also available inFSI Connect, the online learning tool of the Bank for International Settlements.
Apple’s original company creation papers, the three-page contract that formally established Apple Computer Company in 1976, are set to go under the hammer next year and could sell for as much as $4 million. The document, signed by Steve Jobs,…
Hi everyone! This is Lauly, waving hello from Taipei, where we have finally welcomed the arrival of winter. November has passed faster than I expected, as I spent quite some time working on several stories about Foxconn, a key Nvidia and Apple supplier and the world’s biggest contract electronics maker.
I made a short trip to Tokyo at the beginning of this month, conducting an exclusive interview with Foxconn chair Young Liu when he attended Nikkei Forum’s Global Management Dialogue. The interview was even more fruitful than I anticipated. The conversation was natural and smooth, and Liu was frank about sharing Foxconn’s plans in Japan and the US. He also patiently explained his definitions of different levels of robotics used in smart factories.
Leading the contract electronics manufacturing giant since mid-2019, Liu’s personality and management style are very different from his predecessor Terry Gou, Foxconn’s founder and former chair, according to industry analysts and former and current Foxconn employees I spoke with. Reporters like me can also feel a difference. For starters, Liu always greets the media with a big smile, no matter what the occasion. Some other reporters who have covered the company for years describe him as Foxconn’s “underground chief marketing officer”, a characterisation which I don’t disagree with.
Foxconn’s annual tech day was another highlight this month, showcasing a wide variety of the company’s latest technologies, ranging from electric vehicles and semiconductors to smart city solutions and humanoid robots. Of course Nvidia’s latest GB300 NVL72 server system was also highlighted.
It was an exciting event, though If I had to nitpick about one thing, it would have been better not to hear the Foxconn theme song (which was made and produced after Liu became chair) for hours on end. The song itself is nice, but I had the tune stuck in my head for the whole night after I left the venue.
On a different note, thanks to my colleague Annie Cheng Ting-Fang, I had the opportunity to join her exclusive interview with former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, who is now a general partner of venture capital Playground Global.
It was an insightful interview that I enjoyed a lot. Gelsinger touched on many topics from the outlook for AI and the tech ecosystems in Taiwan and Japan to the rebirth of the chipmaking industry in the US.
Intel was also caught up in another big story recently: TSMC filed a lawsuit against Lo Wei-jen, a former executive, over suspicions he leaked sensitive information to Intel, which is also an important client to the Taiwanese company. The lawsuit came a week after Taiwan’s prosecutors launched an investigation against the former executive for possible violations of the national security law. In response, Intel said it stands by its decision to hire Lo and said it had no reason to believe the allegations of trade secret thefts.
It is rare for the world’s two top chipmakers to be caught in such a public disagreement — TSMC even filed a statement on its strongly worded lawsuit with the Taiwan Stock Exchange. It is worth continuing to monitor how the situation develops, as it may have layers of implications for the global tech industry, national security and geopolitics.
Please contribute to our New Year’s survey! We want to know your thoughts on what’s ahead for Asia in 2026 for an upcoming “Big in Asia” feature. The survey will be open until December 8.
Chattanooga challenger
Australia-founded Novonix is building what it says will be North America’s first large-scale production facility for synthetic graphite in Chattanooga, Tennessee, part of a broader US attempt to break China’s dominance in critical materials, Nikkei Asia’s Pak Yiu writes.
Graphite is a crucial ingredient in making batteries used in a wide range of applications like electric vehicles and energy storage systems. It was identified as a strategic resource and a supply chain vulnerability in former US President Joe Biden’s supply chain review report in 2021 due to China’s massive market share in the material.
More than 85 per cent of the world’s supply of graphite came from China last year, according to the International Energy Agency. China’s market share for battery-grade graphite was 96 per cent, while Japan produces just over 2 per cent.
Opening up a lead
This year for the first time, China has overtaken the US in the global market for “open” artificial intelligence models, gaining a crucial edge over how the powerful technology is used around the world, writes the Financial Times’ Melissa Heikkilä.
New data from open source AI start-up Hugging Face and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology shows a big shift in the concentration of power in AI. The total share of downloads of new Chinese-made open models rose to 17 per cent in the past year. The figure surpasses the 15.8 per cent share of downloads from American developers such as Google, Meta and OpenAI.
Open models — which are free to download, modify and integrate by developers — make it easier for start-ups to create products and researchers to improve them.
While US labs have moved towards closed models in the race to build the cutting-edge technology, China has pushed to release open systems that can be adopted widely by the broader AI community. Experts say widespread adoption of China’s open models could have huge consequences for what the future of AI looks like.
A new direction
You probably know Jensen Huang is the chair and CEO of Nvidia, the world’s most valuable AI chip developer, but do you know who leads the company that makes Nvidia’s AI server systems? Meet Young Liu, the man who orchestrated Foxconn’s pivot from making iPhones to AI servers.
Liu took over as chair of the world’s largest contract electronics maker from founder Terry Gou in 2019. It was a rather challenging time for the Taiwanese company, writes Nikkei Asia’s Lauly Li. Foxconn was highly reliant on smartphones, on production in China and on Apple, its biggest client. At the same time, it was walking a tightrope between Washington and Beijing.
In just six years, Liu has steered the manufacturing empire — which is China’s largest private employer, with close to 1mn staff and contract workers — to diversify its production footprint and strengthen its position in the AI supply chain. He has also made the company less reliant on a single top decision maker, fended off enormous pressure from competitors and navigated geopolitical uncertainties and the Covid pandemic.
The company’s share price has tripled since Liu took over, surging in particular over the last three years as he reoriented Foxconn towards AI technologies and aligned the company closely with chipmaker Nvidia.
A rapid roadmap
Rapidus, Japan’s fast-rising homegrown contract chipmaker, plans to start building its second plant in 2027 and aims to produce 1.4-nanometre chips as early as 2029 in a race to narrow the gap with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, write Nikkei’s Ryo Mukano and Hajime Tsukada.
The Japanese chipmaker successfully began pilot production of its 2-nm chips in Hokkaido this summer, marking a milestone since breaking ground on the plant in 2023.
Rapidus plans to begin mass production of 2-nm chips in 2027 as it moves ahead with construction of the second plant, which could also produce 1-nm chips in addition to 1.4-nm products.
TSMC, Intel of the US, Samsung of South Korea and Rapidus are the only companies in the world pursuing such cutting-edge chip production technologies. China’s pace has slowed due to Washington’s export controls that limit its ability to access critical chipmaking equipment and materials.
The Rapidus project is estimated to cost several trillion yen. The Japanese government will invest hundreds of billions of yen in the company, part of which will be used for research and development.
Suggested reads
SoftBank issues cumulative $64bn in retail bonds to power AI ambitions (Nikkei Asia)
VW says it can halve EV development costs with ‘Made in China’ car (FT)
WeRide CEO bullish on growth beyond China and outpacing self-driving rivals (Nikkei Asia)
TSMC sues former top executive who joined US rival Intel (FT)
Foxconn subsidiary aims to double Vietnam revenue on AI boom in 2026 (Nikkei Asia)
South Korea’s homegrown rocket makes 3rd successful launch (Nikkei Asia)
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping hold first call since trade truce (FT)
Alibaba’s overseas business unit makes profit for the first time (Nikkei Asia)
EU to tighten investment rules to stand up to China (FT)
Taiwan minister says US will not put ‘punishing’ tariffs on chip sector (FT)
#techAsia is co-ordinated by Nikkei Asia’s Katherine Creel in Tokyo, with assistance from the FT tech desk in London.
Sign up here at Nikkei Asia to receive #techAsia each week. The editorial team can be reached at techasia@nex.nikkei.co.jp
Herpes zoster, commonly known as shingles, is a viral infection caused by the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), which remains dormant in the sensory ganglia following primary infection with varicella (chickenpox)….
What you eat daily can affect cancer risk. Cancer doctor Tarang Krishna shares which foods to include, which to avoid and how fasting can boost your health.
MANILA, Philippines — Asian shares rose on Thursday, taking their cue from Wall Street, where a winning streak extended to a fourth straight day.
U.S. futures were nearly unchanged while oil prices declined.
Japan’s Nikkei 225 added 1% to 50,069.33 as investors bet that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at its Dec. 10 meeting.
The Japanese government also reportedly plans to issue 11 trillion yen ($70.5 billion) in new bonds to fund its economic package. Tech-related stocks advanced, with SoftBank Group jumping 2.8% and Kioxia Holdings up 5.7% following a nearly 15% rout the day before.
In Chinese markets, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index picked up 0.3% to 25,927.96, while the Shanghai Composite index edged 0.1% higher, to 3,883.01.
Gains were tempered by data that showed profits for the first ten months of 2025 at major Chinese industrial firms rose a lackluster 1.9% year-on-year, down from 3.2% growth in the previous period.
In South Korea, the Kospi added 0.7% to 3,986.54 after the Bank of Korea also kept its policy rate unchanged at 2.5%, supporting financial stability amid a weakened currency and market concerns on rising housing prices.
Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 rose less than 0.1% to 8,610.50 while Taiwan’s tech-heavy Taiex index added 0.2%.
On Wednesday, U.S. stocks closed broadly higher, with the S&P 500 gaining 0.7% to 6,812.61. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.7% to 47,427.12, and the Nasdaq composite added 0.8% to 23,214.69.
Stocks have been rallying as comments from Federal Reserve officials have given traders more confidence the central bank will again cut interest rates at its meeting in December. Traders are betting on a nearly 83% probability that the Fed will cut next month, according to data from CME Group.
Solid gains for technology companies led the rally, though most sectors in the benchmark S&P 500 index finished higher. Gainers also outnumbered decliners by more than 2 to 1 on the New York Stock Exchange.
U.S. markets have a shortened trading week due to the Thanksgiving holiday, closing on Thursday and opening for shorter hours on Friday.
The market’s recent rebound, fueled by investor hopes for another Federal Reserve interest rate cut in December, has helped erase most of the major indexes’ losses following a bout of selling earlier this month.
Dell Technologies climbed 5.8% after saying it has received record orders for its artificial intelligence servers. Dell and other technology companies had fallen earlier in the month as investors worried the prices for their stocks had gotten too frothy amid the frenzy over AI. Nvidia, the market’s most valuable company, rose 1.4%.
Microsoft gained 1.8% and Broadcom added 3.3%.
Financial sector stocks also helped lift the market. Robinhood Markets jumped 10.9% for the biggest gain among S&P 500 companies after the trading platform said it plans to roll out a futures and derivatives exchange next year to expand its predictions market business.
Urban Outfitters joined a host of other retailers this week in reporting earnings that exceeded Wall Street forecasts, and its shares jumped 13.5%.
In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury slipped to 3.99% and the yield on the 2-year Treasury rose to 3.48%.
In other dealings early Thursday, U.S. benchmark crude shed 28 cents to $58.37 per barrel. Brent crude, the international standard lost 33 cents to $61.84 per barrel.
The U.S. dollar slipped to 156.14 Japanese yen from 156.40. The euro rose to $1.1609 from $1.1601.
