Drs. Sebastian Tong and Julie Fritz expand on key takeaways from their recent Grand Rounds presentation, “Integrating the BeatPain Study With PRaCTICe, a New Network Research Hub of the CARE for Health Initiative.”
As the Christmas season looms, with its crowded end-of-year parties, family gatherings and busy travel schedules, many New Zealanders might be asking a now familiar question: should I get another COVID-19 booster?
It’s a tale as old as time — or at least as old as the streaming wars: Should the entertainment business be focused on reach and mass scale? Or should they focus on profitability, to bring back an economic model a bit closer to the glory…
Roscosmos cosmonauts Sergey Kud-Sverchkov (Soyuz MS-28 spacecraft commander) and Sergey Mikayev (flight engineer 1), as well as NASA astronaut Christopher Williams (flight engineer 2).
The latest inflation figures showed a jump in the growth of average prices from 3.6% to 3.8%. But they also indicate just how much our economy is caught up in the ramifications of Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, which sent gas prices higher – and with it our electricity prices.
The October consumer price index figures were a turning point for data in Australia. It marks the change of the official CPI figures going from quarterly to monthly. This is pretty much the biggest data shift since the labour force figures back in 1978 did the same switch from quarterly to monthly.
The move is a good one, given most nations in the OECD measure prices monthly. It gives the Reserve Bank and the government more regular information.
For a number of years, the Australian Bureau of Statistics had been testing measuring inflation monthly, but it left out a few things while it worked out how to count everything. As a result, the latest figures are slightly different from the old monthly figures:
If the graph does not display click here
On the old measure, inflation was slightly lower than the new official measure.
This is also reflected with the “trimmed mean” measure of underlying inflation. While the old monthly figures suggested underlying inflation was below 3%, the new official figures have it at 3.3%
If the graph does not display click here
The underlying inflation measure will probably take on more importance now that the official measure has moved to a monthly survey. The overall CPI figures will now be rather more noisy than they were when they involved an average of three months.
You can see how this affects things when you look at the monthly growth since April 2024 (which is how far back the official monthly data goes). Rather oddly, despite the annual inflation figure rising in October, in October itself inflation did not rise at all:
If the graph does not display click here
This weirdness is even more stark when we look at the biggest drivers of inflation:
If the graph does not display click here
Electricity was the biggest driver of inflation over the past year, but in October electricity prices fell 10.2%.
This confusion is due to the interaction of electricity rebates and inflation.
In July 2023, the Albanese government introduced rebates to protect against the increase in prices due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In July 2024, the states began to get involved as well. And October last year saw the largest impact of the federal and state government rebates on electricity prices:
If the graph does not display click here
But these rebates did not last, and over the past 12 months they have begun to be unwound – and so prices began to rise. Then in August they were extended across a number of areas – and so electricity prices fell again.
But they remain well above where they were in October last year.
Importantly, inflation is the growth of prices from one month to the next, and from one month to the same month the following year. So purely because last October was the month where the energy rebates had the biggest impact, the annual growth in electricity prices since then looks massive.
Were the government rebates not put in place, electricity costs would be about 31% higher now, but the growth (or inflation) of electricity costs would be lower.
But then the question is: why were these rebates needed, and what the heck does it have to do with Putin invading Ukraine?
The problem for Australia is that since the opening of the Gladstone LNG terminal, gas prices on the eastern seaboard have been linked with the world price of gas. Because Russia is a major producer of gas, its invasion of Ukraine and subsequent sanctions of Russian gas and other trade sent world gas prices soaring – doubling from January 2022 to September that year.
Gas is a significant generator of Australia’s electricity, but it is also among the most expensive. However, the way the national energy market operates is that the most expensive source for electricity determines the price at any point in time.
When renewables are able to supply 100% of our electricity, they will determine the cost and prices will be much lower. But because gas often sets the prices (because gas-generated electricity is needed to meet demand), that means there is a very strong link between gas prices and electricity:
If the graph does not display click here
Without the energy rebates, electricity prices would have followed gas prices up, and the hit to households would have been much greater.
On the other side of the coin, the boom in gas prices has led to gas companies making out like bandits.
The value of gas exports from Australia is nearly four times what it was a decade ago. Alas this massive windfall gain for gas companies has not led to a windfall in revenue of the government in the form of the petroleum resource rent tax – if anything, revenue has fallen:
If the graph does not display click here
These latest inflation figures will give few people any joy – not the RBA, nor the government, nor any of us looking at our bills. But they will continue to give comfort to energy and gas producers who know their windfall profits will remain largely untouched by Australia’s tax system.
Apple’s been playing catch-up in the smart home game for years, watching Amazon and Google dominate with their Echo Shows and Nest Hubs. But here’s the thing – all the pieces are finally falling into place for Cupertino to create something…
Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions fell 2.2% last financial year, in what the Albanese government says is the largest annual drop due to reduced fossil fuel use outside the Covid-19 pandemic.
About half of the 9.9m tonnes reduction was due to an increase in solar and wind generation pushing coal-fired power out of the system, according to new government data to be released on Thursday.
Pollution from power generation dropped 3.3%, or 5m tonnes, as the proportion of electricity from renewable energy across the year reached more than 40%. It reversed a brief rise in climate pollution from the power sector in the previous year.
Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter
There were smaller emissions reductions from underground coalmines, heavy industry, farming and households burning gas for heating and cooking.
But pollution from transport continued to increase due to greater use of diesel-power vehicles and more people taking domestic flights.
The climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen, was expected to use an annual climate statement to parliament on Thursday to argue the data showed Labor’s policies since its election in 2022 were having an impact on the amount of carbon dioxide pumped into the atmosphere.
The Coalition and the Greens have argued otherwise: that pollution had either increased under Labor or was flatlining.
Assessing the true picture has been difficult due to the impact of Covid-19 shutdowns, which resulted in a sharp artificial drop in the two years before Albanese came to office, and led to a rebound once restrictions were lifted.
It is unlikely the drop in emissions will be enough to put Australia on track to meet its climate targets.
According to the latest data, annual emissions to June were 437.5m tonnes – 28.5% below 2005 levels.
skip past newsletter promotion
after newsletter promotion
It is expected that an emissions projection report, also to be released on Thursday, will estimate the government’s policies will leave it short but still within reach of where it needs to be to meet its 2030 emissions reduction target – a 43% cut compared with 2005 levels.
The Climate Change Authority last year estimated reaching the target would require emissions to be cut by 15m tonnes a year over the next five years.
The projections report will show the government is much further behind meeting its recently announced 2035 target – a cut of between 62% and 70% below 2005 levels.
It means Labor will need to revamp existing policies and introduce new measures to get to even the bottom end of this commitment.
In a statement on the emissions data, Bowen said the government’s policies, including a renewable energy underwriting program and a home battery subsidy, meant the government was on track to reduce energy bills and meet its climate targets “if we stay the course and continue to lift our efforts”. He said renewable energy provided more than half the electricity in the national grid in October.
The reports released on Thursday do not include the emissions that result overseas from Australian coal and gas exports. A 2024 analysis found Australia ranked second behind only Russia for exported emissions.