Author: admin

  • Five takeaways from the release of a much-awaited crypto market structure bill

    Five takeaways from the release of a much-awaited crypto market structure bill

    The U.S. Capitol is shown the morning after the Senate passed legislation to reopen the federal government on Nov. 11, 2025 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

    Win McNamee | Getty Images

    The Senate Agriculture Committee has released a draft of its portion of a much-awaited digital assets market structure bill — a critical step toward accelerating institutional and retail adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

    Unveiled on Monday by Agriculture Chair John Boozman, R-Ark., and Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., the bipartisan discussion draft lays the groundwork for creating guardrails for the crypto industry in the U.S. It also establishes guidelines for institutions that want to work with digital assets, from bitcoin and ether to tokenized financial instruments.

    “This is the most consequential roadmap for how an institution is going to integrate digital assets into their business,” Cody Carbone, CEO of crypto trade association Digital Chamber, told CNBC. “It’s like the best possible step-by-step of what type of compliance rules requirements they would need to follow to work with crypto.”

    Here are five key takeaways from the discussion draft.

    1. Grants favorable regulatory status to some cryptocurrencies

    The text classifies some of the largest digital assets by market capitalization such as bitcoin and ether as “digital commodities,” placing them under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s purview.  

    This provision removes a major blocker to digital asset adoption for institutional fiduciaries, Juan Leon, an analyst at crypto-focused asset manager Bitwise, told CNBC.

    “Compliance and risk departments will finally have a federal statute to point to,” Leon said. “This shifts the internal conversation … [and] it provides the legal certainty required to move assets into a formal, strategic allocation.”

    It will also create “a starkly bifurcated market” consisting of regulated and unregulated tokens, with the former class of assets seeing “a massive influx of institutional capital, deep liquidity and a robust derivatives ecosystem.”

    2. Requires crypto firms to segregate funds and manage conflicts of interest

    The draft calls for crypto companies to “establish governance, personnel, and financial resource separation among affiliated entities that perform distinct regulated functions.”

    Bitwise’s Leon interprets the provision as a challenge to the “all-in-one” business model that is common among crypto exchanges. According to those models, an exchange, broker, custodian, and proprietary trading desk are all wrapped up into one entity. 

    In other words, digital asset firms could be required to keep their various businesses separated like traditional financial companies, according to Leon. The change would serve as “a foundational pillar for institutional adoption.”

    3. Gives the CFTC more power to regulate digital assets 

    The text gives more power to the CFTC, empowering it to work in tandem with the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue joint rulemaking on crypto-related matters.

    “There’s a lot more power or authority delegated to the CFTC to have jurisdiction over this industry,” Carbone said. 

    The shift comes after the SEC for years served as the main regulator of digital assets, after it edged out the CFTC to gain authority over the industry. 

    4. Allows the CFTC to collect fees

    The draft calls for regulated entities to pay fees to the CFTC. Those fees would go toward registering digital commodity exchanges, brokers and dealers, in addition to conducting oversight of regulated entities and carrying out education and outreach. 

    5. Establishes listing standards for tokens

    The text calls for crypto exchanges to only permit trading of digital commodities that are “not readily susceptible to manipulation.”

    It’s a provision that could reduce the number of “rug pulls” and other scams that are still common in some parts of the crypto industry, with the goal of establishing standards and building confidence in the market.

    What’s next?

    The Senate Agriculture Committee’s discussion draft is far from final, but it does offer critical insights into the direction of efforts to pass crypto-friendly regulations in the U.S., according to Carbone.

    “It’s not final, it’s not done, but this gives a good sense of where Congress is going and what the final rules may be,” Carbone said. 

    The committee will likely spend the next few weeks getting feedback on their draft, meaning it may be “almost impossible to get [a final version of this part of the bill] done by the end of the year,” he added.

    However, that period will give lawmakers time to offer more concrete guidance on several issues that are bracketed – or not yet finalized – in the discussion draft. Those include provisions on anti-money laundering rules and regulations specific to decentralized finance players.

    Several crypto players plan to work in tandem with lawmakers to help iron out those details, among others. 

    “We’ve long said crypto is a bipartisan issue, and this draft from Chairman Boozman and Senator Booker reflects that,” Moonpay President Keith Grossman told CNBC. “It’s critical that legislation distinguishes between centralized intermediaries and decentralized systems, and we look forward to working with the Committee to get it right.”

    The discussion draft is only one piece of larger legislative efforts to overhaul regulations for the crypto industry, according to Carbone. Ultimately, the text will be combined with the Senate Banking Committee’s draft on the digital assets market structure in a bid to create one comprehensive bill.

    And although lawmakers are nowhere near the finish line in that process, crypto firms are finding other ways to work with regulators and other authorities to meaningfully advance their industry, Grayscale Investments Chief Legal Officer Craig Salm told CNBC.

    “In the absence of comprehensive legislation, we’ve still seen meaningful progress on the regulatory front,” Salm said, adding that the SEC, Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department have recently provided guidance around staking in crypto exchange-traded products. “That said, thoughtful legislation will be critical to solidifying the foundation of the digital asset industry in the U.S. and unlocking even greater value for investors and consumers.”

    Continue Reading

  • Equity of Multidisciplinary Hip-Fracture Care in Patients With Dementia: Time-to-Theatre and Discharge Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

    Equity of Multidisciplinary Hip-Fracture Care in Patients With Dementia: Time-to-Theatre and Discharge Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

    Continue Reading

  • Larval Seedbox Boosts Coral Restoration

    Larval Seedbox Boosts Coral Restoration

    Millions of coral larvae on the Great Barrier Reef have an increased chance of replenishing degraded reefs thanks to the ‘larval seedbox’ – a coral restoration technology developed by CSIRO, Australia’s national science agency,…

    Continue Reading

  • Australian supermarket wheat crackers taste test: ‘All the reviewers knew which one was the real deal’ | Australian food and drink

    Australian supermarket wheat crackers taste test: ‘All the reviewers knew which one was the real deal’ | Australian food and drink

    I’ve been wanting to write this article for over a year but I’ve been too intimidated and confused to start. There are several hundred supermarket products that could be called a cracker. Imagine a taste test with 100 versions of the same thing. Do I have the stomach space or mental bandwidth to process that much? Otherwise, how do I decide what’s in or out? Even if I did, how do I rule what is a cracker or not? How do you determine the criteria for tasting something rarely eaten on its own? Do you rate the crackers for deliciousness or compatibility? Are those two things even that different?

    Then there’s the anxiety of spending several days agonising over all that, and conducting a taste test only to arrive at the conclusion that Jatz are great. Do people want to read an article about why Sir Donald Bradman is better than whoever the second-best-ever cricketer is?

    Instead of answering all those questions, I could just have a lovely afternoon making my way through 17 kinds of chocolate or many iced coffees. But last week, my curiosity overcame my anxiety. I sorted several hundred crackers into a complicated family tree-like categorisation system, then sorted that based on the following criteria: size and structure designed for dips, cheese and platters; unflavoured; and wheat-based. This left me with 19 products, a mix of classic, water and wafer crackers.

    Rice crackers, crackers fit for stacking ingredients (the Vita-Weat and Cruskits category), crackers designed for snacking without toppings (the Shapes zone) and gluten-free options will have to wait for future taste tests.

    Nicholas Jordan and friends tasted classic, water and wafer crackers – 19 products in all. Composite: Rémi Chauvin
    ‘The best cracker is both enjoyable to eat on its own and paired with other things’. Photograph: Rémi Chauvin/The Guardian

    I did the blind taste test with six others. We ranked every cracker on appearance, taste and texture. Appearance made up a small percentage of the final score, but texture and taste were weighted evenly.

    When the taste test finished, I had five thoughts:

    • Jatz are, predictably, awesome.

    • So are the products trying to be like Jatz.

    • Water crackers are the opposite of awesome.

    • The best cracker is both enjoyable to eat on its own and paired with other things.

    • What the hell are wafer crackers?

    The best overall

    Arnott’s Jatz Original, 225g, $4 ($1.78 per 100g), available at major supermarkets

    Score: 8.5/10

    There are several crackers that look, smell and taste like Jatz but all the reviewers knew which one was the real deal, and almost everyone gave it the highest score of the day. I don’t think I’ve ever met someone who doesn’t love them (or their southern equivalent, Savoy). So I don’t think it’s a good use of anyone’s time to read or write a paragraph on what they taste like. Instead, I want to address a suspicion I have: that the anxious social organisers among us are hesitant to lay them out on a picnic platter or dinner party. Will they pair with the Époisses de Bourgogne? Do they match the Arita ware? Do they fit in with my aspirational middle-class status? Maybe ask this instead: would you deny your most charismatic friend a wedding invite because their only suit doesn’t match the Pinterest board? Give yourself and your loved ones what they want.

    The best value

    Damora Eton Original Cracker Biscuits, 225g, $1.49 ($0.66 per 100g), available at Aldi

    Score: 8/10

    If both Abba and their tribute band Bjorn Again came to Australia, would you pay $178 to see the original or $66 for something almost as good? Like any great piece of art, Jatz has imitators at a cheaper price – this and Woolworths Snapz Crackers. The Woolworths version tastes like a dialled-down, drier version of the original (it’s lower in fat and salt) – a cover band without the sequined jumpsuits. But the Aldi version is, according to the reviewers, as good or better than the original. Choosing between this and Jatz depends on your budget, brand loyalty and how much heft you want in a cracker (this one is a little denser and crunchier).

    The best cracker for a fancy dinner party

    La Panzanella Mini Artisan Crackers, 85g, $4.99 ($5.87 per 100g), available at select grocers

    Score: 6.5/10

    These crackers didn’t score the highest on appearance – Ritz, Jatz and other recognisable crackers scored better. But I’ve picked out this category because it has a slightly different criteria: cultural capital, which in any middle-class world is hard to gain from anything broadly recognisable. And in that environment, a cracker that looks and tastes bespoke will flourish – look at the jagged edge, the uneven size, the wholemeal colour. Uneven seasoning (some parts bland, some popping with salt crystals) and an oily finish make these inappropriate for solo snacking, but the snap and neutral wheaty flavour will suit your goat’s cheese or quince jam.

    The rest

    Damora Crisps Sea Salt, 150g, $2.99 ($1.99 per 100g), available at Aldi

    Score: 7/10

    A cracker shaped like a country, cut with potato and cornflour, salted more generously than most packets of chips and labelled with a giant emboldened “crisps” is pushing the boundaries of what qualifies as a cracker. Despite how thin it is, it’s solid enough to scoop guacamole and has a good snap. Even if it isn’t a cracker, it does everything you need a cracker to do. You could say that about a Pringle too, but they won’t hold up to the curatorial rigours of the picnic aesthetic, unlike these “crisps”. Like Pringles, these also fail to pair well with Persian fetta, or anything else salty enough to kill a small mammal.

    Ritz Original Crackers, 227g, $3.50 ($1.54 per 100g), available at major supermarkets

    Score: 7/10

    Ritz is unlike any other cracker on the market, and anything that stands out in a field with such homogeneity is going to be divisive. The haters scored it four or five out of 10 and described it as oily, crumbly and “like badly made junk food”. One reviewer wrote: “Way too fleshy, it dissolves in your mouth and sticks to your teeth.” The fans scored it nine out of 10. Instead of oily, they said it was buttery; instead of crumbly, melt-in-your-mouth. You will have to decide which side you’re on.

    Woolworths Oven Baked Sea Salt Crackers, 185g, $2.20 ($1.19 per 100g), available at Woolworths

    Score: 6.5/10

    “Cute frilly edges, my grandma might serve this to me on a doily,” one reviewer wrote. In this case, grandma may have been storing them in the tin a little too long, giving them an oddly stale texture. This cracker has a decent snap but, compared with its peers, it’s far softer to bite and quickly becomes pasty in your mouth. I don’t think they’re literally stale, I think the texture is a result of how much oil they contain (per gram, this is the second-fattiest cracker after Ritz). There were more compliments about the taste, which some described as cheesy – unusual for a cracker made of wheat. My guess is that’s the result of deactivated yeast or “natural flavouring”. But the reason I won’t be buying these is the oddly large size. If you do, be prepared to inform picnic guests that double dipping is OK, or get ready to down a colossal hunk of cheese in one go.

    Kurrajong Kitchen Oaklees Originals, 120g, $3 ($2.50 per 100g), available at Coles

    Score: 6/10

    These are sweet, mealy, malty and toasty, but all of it pushed a little too far, like eating cereal that has been flattened by a steamroller. Do I want to eat that as a snack? No. Do I want to smother it with hummus? Also no. It might be OK with a soft goat’s cheese or something very sharp, but when I’m laying out crackers for a social engagement I don’t want guests to have to troubleshoot their cracker and dip pairings. You might though, and if you do, you should be looking at the flavoured section of the cracker aisle, a wild land with figs, olives, unusual textures and opportunities for platter creativity.

    Wafer crackers

    Average price: $2.50 per 100g

    Average score: 6.5/10

    We tried four wafer crackers and they all scored six or six-and-a-half out of 10. If I hadn’t eaten them right after each other, I don’t think I would have been able to tell the difference. They all have a useful and pleasing rice-cracker-like brittleness, but they all go a bit gluey after a few chews, like a wheat-flavoured Roll-Up. I was shocked to find they all included cheese powder, a fact none of the reviewers picked up when tasting them. Ultimately, they’re serviceable but boring, a cracker that would be served at the Christmas parties of local government organisations. As they’re more expensive per gram than Jatz or Eton, I will never buy them.

    Water crackers

    Average price: $1.15 per 100g

    Average score: 3.5/10

    I don’t think there’s any point in comparing water crackers. Sure, some are worse than others, but as you can see from the score table below, the best water crackers are easily worse than all other crackers. The first red flag is the name, a comic advertisement of how boring the incoming experience is. Boredom is fine, you can put baba ganoush on that, but the real kicker is the irony: this is the least wet experience I’ve had in any taste test, and that includes eating 18 tahinis in one sitting. If I was a dentist, I’d use them as saliva ejectors. I’m surprised I hadn’t written off water crackers sooner. Given their absurdly low prices, I can forgive the oral dehydration but I can’t excuse buying them while knowing I can get a pack of Eton for cheaper. If there is ever a global wheat shortage, water crackers should be the first thing to go.

    Table of crackers, ranked by score, then price and where they’re available to purchase.

    Continue Reading

  • Low-Cost Sensor Shields Water from Fireworks Pollution

    Low-Cost Sensor Shields Water from Fireworks Pollution

    A team of researchers from Nanjing University and Nanjing Normal University has designed a new, affordable sensor to detect toxic perchlorate in water, paving the way for better environmental monitoring and healthier communities. The…

    Continue Reading

  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra key specs just leaked — and the biggest charging upgrade in 6 years

    Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra key specs just leaked — and the biggest charging upgrade in 6 years

    Despite being more than three months away from the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S26 series, leaks and rumors have been flying fast this week. And these leaks include new images of the handsets and a potential camera upgrade.

    The latest one…

    Continue Reading

  • Common Chemical Used To Clean Clothes Linked To Spike In Liver Disease – iHeart

    1. Common Chemical Used To Clean Clothes Linked To Spike In Liver Disease  iHeart
    2. Everyday Chemical Linked to Liver Disease and Cancer, Study Warns  SciTechDaily
    3. 5 alternatives to toxic dry cleaning  The Washington Post
    4. Dry-cleaning danger: This…

    Continue Reading