.
ISLAMABAD:
Following the emergence of a corruption scandal involving some…

In a groundbreaking, multicohort study published in 2025, researchers have unveiled intricate details of how the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and its treatments distinctly sculpt the gut microbiome across diverse geographic populations….

Getty ImagesWhen Anna was planning her first visit to Xinjiang in 2015, her friends were perplexed.
“They couldn’t understand why I’d visit a place that back…


Everything scientists have gleaned so far about interstellar comets like 3I/ATLAS, they’ve gleaned by looking at them through a telescope.
And what a variety of telescopes scientists have at their disposal today.

Meiji Electric Industries (TSE:3388) posted an uptick in profitability, with net profit margins reaching 3.8%, up from 2.8% last year. The company has delivered high quality earnings, with annual EPS growth averaging 10% over the past five years and a recent annual spike of 47.9% that handily beats its typical pace. These results put the spotlight on consistent profit momentum and a favorable valuation compared to industry peers, even as investors weigh some caution on dividend sustainability and the current premium to estimated fair value.
See our full analysis for Meiji Electric IndustriesLtd.
Now, let’s see how these headline numbers hold up when set against the prevailing narratives in the market, where expectations get boosted and where they meet some pushback.
Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives
Net profit margin climbed to 3.8%, exceeding last year’s 2.8% and demonstrating a stronger margin profile than many sector competitors.
Market analysis points out that investors are closely watching Meiji Electric’s sustained margin expansion, which stands out as sector-wide cost pressures persist.
While many industry players struggle to defend profitability, Meiji’s stable margin gains signal underlying efficiency that could serve as a buffer against future volatility.
Some observers, however, are waiting to see if these improvements are durable, as temporary cost savings do not always translate to steady long-term margin performance.
Five-year earnings have grown at an average annual rate of 10%, and the most recent year surged by 47.9%, which is well above the historical trend.
The prevailing view is that this earnings trajectory could signal a stronger competitive position than peers. However, there are calls for careful monitoring to determine whether such outperformance is a new norm or a one-off.
Analysts are highlighting the stark jump in this year’s profit growth, especially when compared with both the company’s multiyear average and the steadier pace across the sector.
However, there is cautious optimism as investors weigh whether the exceptional result can become a pattern, particularly since similar companies have experienced more muted gains.
Meiji Electric is trading at ¥2,325, which is notably above its DCF fair value estimate of ¥1,604.04. This is despite its attractive price-to-earnings ratio of 9.5x compared to the industry average of 10.1x and peer average of 11.6x.
Prevailing analysis flags a tension: while the valuation multiple suggests relative affordability, the share price premium over DCF fair value means investors are factoring in substantial further growth.
For value-focused investors, this premium could act as a yellow light, especially if future profit momentum stalls or if sector multiples contract.
Efficiency gains and earnings growth have justified a higher price. Still, remaining above DCF fair value increases downside risk if expectations shift suddenly.

France’s consumer watchdog has reported the Asian fast fashion giant Shein to authorities for selling “sex dolls with a childlike appearance” on its website.
The Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) said the online description and categorisation of the dolls “makes it difficult to doubt the child pornography nature of the content”.
Shein later told the BBC: “The products in question were immediately delisted as soon as we became aware of these serious issues.”
It said its team was “investigating how these listings circumvented our screening measures”. Shein is also “conducting a comprehensive review to identify and remove any similar items that may be listed on our marketplace by other third-party vendors”.
The DGCCRF has reported Shein to French prosecutors as well as Arcom, the country’s online and broadcasting regulator, according to French media.
The news has emerged just days before Shein is set to open its first permanent physical shop anywhere in the world – in a Parisian department store.

Imperial Hotel (TSE:9708) posted modest revenue growth of 1.6% per year, trailing the Japanese market’s 4.5% average. Net profit margins edged up to 5.4% from 5% last year, while the company reported a significant one-off gain of ¥561.0 million that contributed to its latest profits. Although historical earnings grew at 65.3% per year over the past five years, growth has slowed to 5.4% most recently. Future earnings are expected to decline by 30% annually over the next three years.
See our full analysis for Imperial Hotel.
Next, we will see how these financial figures compare to the prevailing narratives around Imperial Hotel and whether they support market sentiment or reveal new risks and opportunities.
Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives
Net profit margin reached 5.4%, up from 5% the previous year. The improvement was boosted by a non-recurring one-off gain of ¥561.0 million, rather than ongoing business growth.
While optimism centers on Imperial Hotel’s transition to profitability, helped by a historical annual earnings growth rate of 65.3% over five years, scrutiny is growing over how much of these results were driven by short-term, one-time benefits instead of repeatable performance.
The most recent year’s earnings growth slowed to 5.4%, a sharp drop from the five-year average, challenging the idea of rapidly compounding profits underpinning bullish expectations.
This raises the stakes for future quarters. Any lack of similar one-off gains could expose underlying earnings weakness, potentially unsettling those banking on continued strong profit momentum.
Imperial Hotel trades at ¥1,102 per share, which is significantly below its DCF fair value of ¥3,282.18. This suggests the stock could be undervalued by this metric even as its growth slows.
Investors highlighting this gap argue the current share price is not reflecting the company’s core asset value or future cash flow potential, especially if profit stabilization resumes after the near-term expected earnings declines.
At the same time, persistent forecasted annual earnings declines of 30% over the next three years might explain investor hesitation to bid shares up toward their modeled fair value.
The stark difference between discounted cash flow valuation and market price sets apart those betting on a turnaround from those anticipating a prolonged slowdown.
The company trades on a price-to-earnings ratio of 45.8x, compared to an industry average of 23.1x and a peer average of 15.5x. This indicates a substantial premium relative to comparable firms.
Despite being considered undervalued on a DCF basis, the current high P/E ratio may signal the market is already pricing in a lot of future growth or unique business advantages that could be tough to deliver as forecasted earnings decline.
This disconnect highlights how valuation signals are mixed. While the DCF suggests value, traditional multiples point to a market bracing for either risk or future improvement far beyond industry trends.
With profits recently boosted by one-time items and growth set to retreat, investors may be wary of paying a premium absent clear signs of sustainable advantage.

JTEKT (TSE:6473) has caught the eye of investors following its very strong performance over the past month, with the stock up 7%. This run comes as the company’s fundamentals remain solid.
See our latest analysis for JTEKT.
This recent surge follows a broader upswing for JTEKT, as the company’s share price has gained 33% so far this year. The one-year total shareholder return stands at an impressive 53%. Momentum appears to be building, suggesting rising optimism around JTEKT’s growth prospects and underlying value.
If JTEKT’s pace has you curious about what else is making moves in the auto space, broaden your watchlist and discover See the full list for free.
But with JTEKT’s strong rally and impressive returns, the key question now is whether there is still room for upside or if recent gains mean the market has already priced in its future growth.
JTEKT is currently trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 25.1x, notably higher than both its industry peers and the broader market. The last close price was ¥1,549.5, which points towards a richer valuation than what is typical for similar companies in the auto components sector.
The price-to-earnings ratio reflects how much investors are willing to pay for each yen of earnings generated by the company. For auto sector firms, this multiple can highlight expectations around future growth, profitability, and risk profile. In JTEKT’s case, the elevated multiple suggests the market is pricing in strong anticipated earnings growth or rewarding the company for drivers possibly not yet reflected in its reported numbers.
Yet, when stacked directly against the peer group average of 13.6x and the Japanese auto components industry average of 11.6x, JTEKT appears significantly more expensive. However, the fair price-to-earnings ratio for JTEKT is estimated to be 26x. This hints that the current valuation is not significantly out of line with what the market may ultimately settle at over time.
Explore the SWS fair ratio for JTEKT
Result: Price-to-Earnings of 25.1x (OVERVALUED)
However, weaker revenue growth or a slowdown in net income gains could challenge the current investor optimism and affect JTEKT’s premium valuation outlook.
Find out about the key risks to this JTEKT narrative.
While JTEKT’s price-to-earnings ratio seems high, our DCF model tells a different story. According to this method, shares are trading nearly 70% below their estimated fair value. This suggests the market may be missing something significant or pricing in risk. Which side should investors trust?