Apple’s corporate landscape in 2026 reveals a tech giant confidently navigating strategic transitions while delivering both innovation and stability. What’s fascinating is how the company balances maintaining its premium market position with…
Author: admin
-
Vendor Applications and Sponsorship Opportunities Now Open for 2026 Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market!
The City of Sonoma is excited to announce that vendor applications and sponsorship opportunities for the 2026 Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market season are now open! The market, held in the historic Sonoma Plaza, is a beloved weekly tradition bringing together thousands of visitors to shop, dine, and connect with local farmers, artisans, and businesses.
Vendor Applications:
Join the vibrant community of farmers, food purveyors, artisans, and non-profit organizations that make Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market a highlight of the season. Applications are now available for:The market runs every Tuesday from May through September 8th, 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
For more information, contact Market Manager Jerry Wheeler at manager@sonomastuesdaynightmarket.com or call 707-974-0216. Don’t miss your chance to showcase your products and connect with the community!
Sponsorship Opportunities:
Support Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market while gaining visibility for your brand! Choose from exciting sponsorship packages, including:- Bicycle Valet Sponsorship ($3,500): Promote sustainable transportation and connect directly with market attendees.
- Stainless Steel Wine Cup Sponsorship ($15,000): Provide reusable drinkware and enjoy extensive promotional benefits.
- Music Sponsorship ($1,300): Sponsor live music and have your brand featured on signage and during announcements.
- Stage Power Sponsorship ($3,000): Keep the performances going while showcasing your support.
- Green Sponsor ($4,000): Champion eco-friendly initiatives with prominent recognition.
- EBT Market Match Sponsorship ($3,000): Help make fresh produce accessible to everyone while supporting local agriculture.
- Zucchini Race Sponsor ($3,000): Be part of this fun, creative community event.
- Reusable Water Bottle Sponsorship ($11,500): Align your brand with sustainability through high-quality branded water bottles.
- Stainless Steel Wine Cup Sponsor ($15,000): Outfit the community with commemorative stainless-steel reusable wine or beer cups that will last for years to come (to be distributed at the beverage booth).
Each sponsorship offers pre-market, event, and post-market promotional opportunities, as well as the first right of refusal for the 2027 market season.
About Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market:
Experience the best of Sonoma every Tuesday evening at the historic Sonoma Plaza. From fresh fruits and vegetables to local honey, baked goods, and artisan crafts, the market celebrates everything grown, raised, and made locally. Enjoy live music, a variety of food stands, and the company of friends and neighbors in a beautiful outdoor setting.Act now to secure your spot or sponsorship! Visit Sonoma’s Tuesday Night Market website for detailed information, applications, and more. Let’s make the 2026 season one to remember!
Continue Reading
-
Calgary quantum researchers discover rule-breaking new uses for diamonds
Breakthrough discovery could see diamonds used in data centres and laser manufacturing.
There’s an old saying about girls and diamonds. It probably hasn’t aged well. A more appropriate saying in 2026…
Continue Reading
-
Jupiter to outshine stars this weekend, but clouds may block view in eastern U.S.
(WLOS) — This weekend, Jupiter becomes its biggest, brightest, and closest of the year, outshining every star in the sky.
Jupiter will be at opposition. Earth will be directly between the giant planet and the Sun.
In opposition, Jupiter rises at…
Continue Reading
-
Gateway to the World: Clayton County Prepares for 2026 FIFA World Cup Global Visitors and Business Prospects – Clayton County, Georgia (.gov)
- Gateway to the World: Clayton County Prepares for 2026 FIFA World Cup Global Visitors and Business Prospects Clayton County, Georgia (.gov)
- Georgia Today: MARTA prepares for the FIFA World Cup; MLK Weekend events; Jeanette Rankin Georgia Public…
Continue Reading
-
Illinois Heads to Purdue for Second Big Ten Road Meet
Meet: at Purdue
When: Saturday, January 10
Time (CT): 10… Continue Reading
-
Commission to protect Maine hospitals issues recommendations
A commission to protect Maine hospitals this week issued a report with more than a dozen recommendations.
They include codifying into state law that hospitals must give 120 days notice before closing a…
Continue Reading
-
Lp(a) Linked to 30-Year CVD Risk in Healthy Women
Very high Lp(a) also correlated with higher risks of ischemic stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the Women’s Health Study.
Healthy women with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are at greater risk of cardiovascular events over…
Continue Reading
-
Relationship between preoperative supine radiographs and intraoperative coronal spinal alignment in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Westrick, E. R. & Ward, W. T. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-Year to 20-Year Evidence-based surgical results. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 31, S61–S68. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd87d5 (2011).
Nam, Y., Choi, K., Jang, J., Kim, K. & Lee, G. Curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb angles between 40 and 50 degrees at the late stage of skeletal growth: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J. Clin. Med. 14 (15), 5272 (2025).
Miyanji, F. et al. A detailed analysis of the Lenke classification in surgical decision-making for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 8 (1), 41–48 (2020).
Ilharreborde, B. et al. Hybrid constructs for tridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative analysis of universal clamps versus hooks. Spine 35, 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4 (2010).
Cheung, K. M. C. & Luk, K. D. K. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending Radiograph*. J. Bone Joint Surg. 79, 1144–1150. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199708000-00005 (1997).
Vedantam, R., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H. & Linville, D. L. Comparison of push-prone and lateral-bending radiographs for predicting postoperative coronal alignment in thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliotic curves. Spine 25, 76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200001010-00014 (2000).
Klepps, S. J., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H., Bassett, G. S. & Whorton, J. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26, E74–E79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200103010-00002 (2001).
Hamzaoglu, A. et al. Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic. Scoliosis: Spine. 30, 1637–1642. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000170580.92177.d2 (2005).
Lenke classification system of adolescent. Idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Str. Course Lect 54, 537–542 (2005).
O’Brien, M. F., Kuklo, T. R. & Blanke, K. M. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, 2005).
Watanabe, K. et al. Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during intraoperative halo-femoral traction in scoliosis surgery. Spine 32, E849–E852. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318074da84 (2007).
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. GPower 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods. 39 (2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 (2007).
Faro, F. D., Marks, M. C., Pawelek, J. & Newton, P. O. Evaluation of a functional position for lateral radiograph acquisition in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29, 2284–2289. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000142224.46796.a7 (2004).
Ilharreborde, B. et al. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOSThree-Dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine 36, E1306–E1313. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182293548 (2011).
Vidal, C., Ilharreborde, B., Azoulay, R., Sebag, G. & Mazda, K. Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur. Spine J. 22, 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2752-2 (2013).
Potter, B. K. et al. Reliability of End, Neutral, and stable vertebrae identification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 30, 1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000170290.05381.9a (2005).
Julien-Marsollier, F. et al. Benefits of a spine team for the surgical management of paediatric scoliosis. Orthop. Traumatology: Surg. Res. 103976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103976 (2024).
Harrington, P. R. Technical details in relation to the successful use of instrumentation in scoliosis. Orthop Clin. North. Am (1972).
Moe, J. H. Methods of correction and surgical techniques in scoliosis. Orthop Clin. North. Am (1972).
Burton, D. C., Asher, M. A. & Lai, S-M. The selection of fusion levels using torsional correction techniques in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24, 1728. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908150-00015 (1999).
Ilharreborde, B., Sebag, G., Skalli, W. & Mazda, K. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system. Eur. Spine J. 22, 2382–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2776-7 (2013).
Reames, D. L. et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of 19,360 cases of pediatric scoliosis: A review of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality database. Spine 36, 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f3a326 (2011).
Yagi, M., Takemitsu, M. & Machida, M. Chest cage angle difference and rotation of main thoracic curve are independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38, E1209–E1215. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e0309 (2013).
Sabharwal, S., Apazidis, A., Zhao, C., Hullinger, H. & Vives, M. Comparison of intraoperative supine and postoperative standing radiographs after posterior instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B. 20, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e328347c2bc (2011).
Learch, T. J., Massie, J. B., Pathria, M. N., Ahlgren, B. A. & Garfin, S. R. Assessment of pedicle screw placement utilizing conventional radiography and computed tomography: A proposed systematic approach to improve accuracy of interpretation. Spine 29, 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000112071.69448.A1 (2004).
Cheh, G. et al. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 32, 2668–2672. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a5269 (2007).
Swany, L. M., Larson, A. N., Buyuk, A. F. & Milbrandt, T. A. Comparison of slot-scanning standing, supine, and fulcrum radiographs for assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study. Spine Deform. 9, 1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00349-9 (2021).
Ramchandran, S. et al. Impact of supine radiographs to assess curve flexibility in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Glob. Spine J. 12, 1731–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220988271 (2022).
Han, S-M. et al. Spinal sagittal alignment and postoperative adding-on in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after surgery. Orthop. Traumatol. 108, 103352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103352 (2022).
Vidal, C., Ilharreborde, B., Queinnec, S. & Mazda, K. Role of intraoperative radiographs in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 36, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000428 (2016).
Rodrigues, L. M. R. et al. Comparison between different radiographic methods for evaluating the flexibility of scoliosis curves. Acta Ortop. Bras. 22, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220200844 (2014).
Lenke, L. G. et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. (2001).
Thawrani, D., Agabegi, S. S., Eismann, E., Martin, R. & Sturm, P. F. Accuracy and reliability of drawing central sacral vertical line on scoliosis radiographs in clinical practice. Spine Deformity. 1, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.10.003 (2013).
Uneri, A. et al. Intraoperative evaluation of device placement in spine surgery using known-component 3D–2D image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 3330–3351. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa62c5 (2017).
Jeantet, R-E., Simon, A-L., Happiette, A. & Ilharreborde, B. Bivertebral pedicle-supralaminar autostable claw for proximal fixation of magnetic growing rods in early-onset scoliosis. Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103634 (2023).
Luhmann, S. J., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H. & Schootman, M. Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 34, 2191–2197. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a (2009).
Jones, M. et al. A united Kingdom single centre review of the impact of extended waiting times in Early-Onset scoliosis: the effect of a delay to surgical treatment of greater than 12 months. Spine Deformity. 5, 446–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.09.018 (2017).
Ohrt-Nissen, S., Luk, K. D. K., Samartzis, D. & Cheung, J. P. Y. Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra? Eur. Spine J. 29, 2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06398-4 (2020).
Compagnon, R. et al. Side bending radiographs and lowest instrumented vertebra in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A French quality-of-care study. Orthop. Traumatol. 108, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103350 (2022).
Iida, T. et al. Performance of forward roll maneuvers following corrective spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis patients. Orthop. Traumatol. 107, 103034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103034 (2021).
Dang, N. R., Moreau, M. J., Hill, D. L., Mahood, J. K. & Raso, J. Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the spinal deformity study groups AIS radiographic measurement Manual. Spine 30, 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000160840.51621.6b (2005).
Ogon, M. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of lenke’s new scoliosis classification system. Spine 27, 858–862. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204150-00014 (2002).
Kuklo, T. R., Potter, B. K., Schroeder, T. M. & O’Brien, M. F. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 31, 1240–1246. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000217774.13433.a7 (2006).
Mok, J. M. et al. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33, 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d (2008).
Liu, R. W. et al. Comparison of supine Bending, Push-Prone, and traction under general anesthesia radiographs in predicting curve flexibility and postoperative correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 35, 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3564a (2010).
Jeandel, C. et al. Enhanced recovery following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A medical and economic study in a French private nonprofit pediatric hospital. Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103626 (2023).
Langlais, T. et al. Sagittal plane assessment of manual concave rod bending for posterior correction in adolescents with idiopathic thoracic scoliosis (Lenke 1 and 3). Orthop. Traumatol. 109, 103654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103654 (2023).
Baldairon, F. et al. Analysis of factors associated with sagittal alignment deterioration after correction of degenerative scoliosis by in situ contouring. Orthop. Traumatol. 107, 103023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103023 (2021).
Continue Reading
