2025 has been a busy year for OnePlus, with close to a dozen different launches across the globe in various categories. However, it was also one of the more controversial years for the brand, and signaled a change in direction for the…
Author: admin
-
A big data approach to artificial intelligence driven predictive modelling for optimizing material properties in additive manufacturing
Joshua, R. J. N. et al. Powder bed fusion 3D printing in precision manufacturing for biomedical applications. Compr. Rev. Materials. 17 (3), 769 (2024).
Zhou, L. et al. Additive manufacturing: A comprehensive review. Sensors 24 (9), 2668 (2024).
Onuike, B. & Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of inconel 718–Ti6Al4V bimetallic structures. Additive Manuf. 22, 844–851 (2018).
Ji, S. et al. Microstructural evolution and high-temperature resistance of functionally graded material Ti-6Al-4V/Inconel 718 coated by directed energy deposition-laser. J. Alloys Compd. 848, 156255 (2020).
Park, C. W., Hajra, R. N., Kim, S. H., Lee, S. H. & Kim, J. H. Optimizing multi-interlayered additive manufacturing for high-strength robust joints in inconel 718 and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 25, 855–872 (2023).
Hashemi, S. M. et al. Computational modeling of process–structure–property–performance relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Int. Mater. Rev. 67 (1), 1–46 (2022).
Sharma, A. S., Yadav, S., Biswas, K. & Basu, B. High-entropy alloys and metallic nanocomposites: processing challenges, microstructure development and property enhancement. Mater. Sci. Engineering: R: Rep. 131, 1–42 (2018).
Kouraytem, N., Li, X., Tan, W., Kappes, B. & Spear, A. D. Modeling process–structure–property relationships in metal additive manufacturing: a review on physics-driven versus data-driven approaches. J. Physics: Mater. 4 (3), 032002 (2021).
Yigezu, B. S., Mahapatra, M. M. & Jha, P. K. Influence of reinforcement type on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of an aluminum alloy metal matrix composite. J. Minerals Mater. Charact. Eng. 1 (4), 124–130 (2013).
Shahzad, K., Mardare, A. I. & Hassel, A. W. Accelerating materials discovery: combinatorial synthesis, high-throughput characterization, and computational advances. Sci. Technol. Adv. Materials: Methods. 4 (1), 2292486 (2024).
Shen, S. C. et al. Computational design and manufacturing of sustainable materials through first principles and materiomics. Chem. Rev. 123 (5), 2242–2275 (2023).
Herriott, C. & Spear, A. D. Predicting microstructure-dependent mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals with machine and deep-learning methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 175, 109599 (2020).
Lee, K. H., Lim, H. J. & Yun, G. J. A data-driven framework for designing microstructure of multifunctional composites with deep-learned diffusion-based generative models. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 129, 107590 (2024).
Guo, S. et al. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm. J. Manuf. Syst. 62, 145–163 (2022).
Nasiri, S. & Khosravani, M. R. Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14, 1137–1153 (2021).
Min, Y. I. et al. Machine learning for predicting fatigue properties of additively manufactured materials. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 37 (4), 1–22 (2024).
Valizadeh, M. & Wolff, S. J. Convolutional neural network applications in additive manufacturing: A review. Adv. Industrial Manuf. Eng. 4, 100072 (2022).
Battula, S., Alla, S. N., Ramana, E. V., Kumar, N. K. & Murthy, S. B. Uncertainty quantification for digital twins in smart manufacturing and robotics: A review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2837, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing. (2024), October.
Akbari, P., Zamani, M. & Mostafaei, A. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 91, 104320 (2024).
Pouchard, L., Reyes, K. G., Alexander, F. J. & Yoon, B. J. A rigorous uncertainty-aware quantification framework is essential for reproducible and replicable machine learning workflows. Digit. Discovery. 2 (5), 1251–1258 (2023).
Sanyal, S. et al. Mt-cgcnn: integrating crystal graph convolutional neural network with multitask learning for material property prediction. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1811.05660. (2018).
Kong, S., Guevarra, D., Gomes, C. P. & Gregoire, J. M. Materials representation and transfer learning for multi-property prediction. Applied Phys. Reviews, 8(2). (2021).
Massa, D., Chmielna, I. N., Kaszuba, G., Papanikolaou, S. & Sankowski, P. Transfer Learning in Materials Informatics: structure-property relationships through minimal but highly informative multimodal input.
Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (14), 145301 (2018).
Karamad, M. et al. Orbital graph convolutional neural network for material property prediction. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4 (9), 093801 (2020).
Shin, S. J. et al. Material-Adaptive anomaly detection using Property-Concatenated transfer learning in wire Arc additive manufacturing. Int. J. Precis Eng. Manuf. 25, 383–408 (2024).
Yang, K. et al. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59 (8), 3370–3388 (2019).
Luo, Q., Shimanek, J. D., Simpson, T. W. & Beese, A. M. An image-based transfer learning approach for using in situ processing data to predict laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V mechanical properties: 3D printing and additive manufacturing. 12(1), 48–60 (2024).
Li, L. et al. Uncertainty quantification in multivariable regression for material property prediction with bayesian neural networks. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 10543 (2024).
Tang, W. et al. Modeling and prediction of fatigue properties of additively manufactured metals. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 36, 181–213 (2023).
Battula, S., Alla, S. N., Ramana, E. V., Kumar, N. K. & Murthy, S. B. Uncertainty quantification for digital twins in smart manufacturing and robotics: A review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2837(1), 012059. (2024), October.
Toprak, C. B. & Dogruer, C. U. Optimal process parameter determination in selective laser melting via machine learning-guided sequential quadratic programing. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 239 (3), 807–820 (2025).
ASTM F2924-14. Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminium-4 Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion (ASTM International, 2014).
ASTM B213-13. Standard Test Methods for Flow Rate of Metal Powders Using the Hall Flowmeter Funnel (ASTM International, 2013).
Dadbakhsh, S., Speirs, M., Kruth, J. P. & Van Humbeeck, J. Influence of SLM parameters on mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel 316L. Rapid Prototyp. J. 22 (4), 654–664 (2016).
ASTM E11-20. Standard Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves (ASTM International, 2020).
ASTM E8/E8M-21. Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (ASTM International, 2021).
Vrancken, B., Thijs, L., Kruth, J. P. & Van Humbeeck, J. Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 541, 177–185 (2012).
ASTM E112-13. Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size (ASTM International, 2013).
Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36 (8), 1627–1639 (1964).
Li, R. et al. Application of unsupervised learning methods based on video data for real-time anomaly detection in wire Arc additive manufacturing. J. Manuf. Process. 143, 37–55 (2025).
Zheng, Y. et al. A thermal history-based approach to predict mechanical properties of plasma Arc additively manufactured IN625 thin-wall. J. Manuf. Process. 140, 91–107 (2025).
Zuo, X. et al. 3D printed All-Natural hydrogels: Flame-Retardant materials toward attaining green sustainability. Adv. Sci. 11 (3), 2306360 (2024).
Wang, L. et al. Multi-unit global-local registration for 3D bent tube based on implicit structural feature compatibility. Adv. Eng. Inform. 65, 103120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.103120 (2025).
Yao, S., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Zhou, H. & Liu, K. Manufacturing defect-induced multiscale weakening mechanisms in carbon fiber reinforced polymers captured by 3D CT-based machine learning and high-fidelity modeling. Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufac. 197, 109052 (2025).
Zhang, Z. et al. Robotic wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 88, 104261 (2024).
Niu, S. et al. Breaking the Trade-Off between complexity and absorbing performance in metamaterials through intelligent design. Small 21 (24), 2502828 (2025).
Ren, D. et al. Harmonizing physical and deep learning modeling: A computationally efficient and interpretable approach for property prediction. Scripta Mater. 255, 116350 (2025).
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1 (1), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (2013).
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with High-Throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65 (11), 1501–1509 (2013).
Shen, C. et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 179, 201–214 (2019).
Sun, X. et al. Wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing of AZ31B magnesium alloy: precipitate behavior and mechanical properties. J. Magnesium Alloys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2025.04.025 (2025).
Chen, S., Khan, S. B., Li, N. & Xiao, C. In-depth analysis of sintering, exposure time, and layer height (µm) in LRS 3D printed devices with DLP. J. Manuf. Process. 133, 576–591 (2025).
Ding, C., Li, C., Xiong, Z. & Li, Z. Computer-based big data technology in additive manufacturing and product design in sustainable manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 135 (9), 4855–4863 (2024).
Long, J. et al. Printing dense and low-resistance copper microstructures via highly directional laser-induced forward transfer. Additive Manuf. 103, 104755 (2025).
Xu, K. et al. Data-Driven materials research and development for functional coatings. Adv. Sci. 11 (42), 2405262 (2024).
Shi, S. et al. Significance of α-Al cellular matrix in tensile behavior and work-hardening of additive manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Virtual Phys. Prototyp., 20(1), e2449189. (2025).
Zheng, Y. et al. A thermal history-based approach to predict mechanical properties of plasma Arc additively manufactured IN625 thin-wall. J. Manuf. Process. 140, 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.043 (2025).
Wang, Z. et al. Digital-twin-enabled online wrinkling monitoring of metal tube bending manufacturing: A multi-fidelity approach using forward-convolution-GAN. Appl. Soft Comput. 171, 112684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112684 (2025).
Sun, S. et al. Wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing enables enhanced interlayer bonding in aluminum-matrix composites. J. Manuf. Process. 153, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.08.078 (2025).
Luo, J., Cheng, Z., Yu, N., Tian, Y. & Meng, J. A flexible skin material with switchable wettability for trans-medium vehicles. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 16 (2), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2025.2504442 (2025).
Sun, F. et al. A versatile microporous design toward toughened yet softened Self-Healing materials. Adv. Mater. 36 (50), 2410650. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202410650 (2024).
Zhang, Z. et al. Robotic wire-based friction stir additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf. 88, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104261 (2024).
Yang, G. et al. Prediction of restrained stress for UHPC: considering relationship between long-term and in-situ creep. Constr. Build. Mater. 484, 141722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141722 (2025).
Zhang, J. et al. Modeling sediment flux in river confluences: A comprehensive momentum-based study. Water Resour. Res. 61, e2024WR039154. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR039154 (2025).
Ren, D. et al. Harmonizing physical and deep learning modeling: A computationally efficient and interpretable approach for property prediction. Scripta Mater. 255, 116350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116350 (2025).
Shen, C. et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 179, 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033 (2019).
Zhang, Z. et al. Optimization of low-power femtosecond laser Trepan drilling by machine learning and a high-throughput multi-objective genetic algorithm. Opt. Laser Technol. 148, 107688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107688 (2022).
Wang, H., Li, Y., Men, T. & Li, L. Physically interpretable Wavelet-Guided networks with dynamic frequency decomposition for machine intelligence fault prediction. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybernetics: Syst. 54 (8), 4863–4875. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2024.3389068 (2024).
Liu, H., Zhang, D. & Geng, D. Design of a self-excited vibration tool bar for cutting difficult-to-machine alloys. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 300, 110456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110456 (2025).
Xu, H. et al. An innovative normal self-positioning method with gravity and friction compensation for wall-climbing drilling robot in aircraft assembly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 138 (7), 3687–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15677-7 (2025).
Cao, Y. et al. Structural-Functional-Integrated Ultra-Wideband Microwave-Absorbing composites based on in Situ-Grown graphene Meta-nanointerface. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 (52), 2411271. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202411271 (2024).
Peng, J. et al. Numerical simulation and process optimization of laser welding in 6056 aluminum alloy T-Joints. Crystals 15 (1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15010035 (2025).
Cao, Y. et al. Multi-Functional Self-Sensing electronic gasket for structural health monitoring of transportation pipelines. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (20), 2412634. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202412634 (2025).
Shi, S. et al. Significance of α-Al cellular matrix in tensile behavior and work-hardening of additive-manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 20 (1), e2449189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2449189 (2025).
Continue Reading
-
Bangladesh to demand T20 World Cup matches be moved outside India – France 24
- Bangladesh to demand T20 World Cup matches be moved outside India France 24
- Bangladesh look to move T20 World Cup matches from India amid Mustafizur row ESPNcricinfo
- ‘Days of slavery are over’: Bangladesh to demand its T20 World Cup matches…
Continue Reading
-
These 1980s Home Décor Ideas Are Suddenly Trending Again
There is a particular pleasure in leafing through old magazine archives. You notice which interiors still feel timeless, which collectables did people value and what recipes appeared again and again.
There are, of course, certain ideas best…
Continue Reading
-
An adults-only enclave with private pools for all on a peaceful Greek island
Keep it on the QT, but those looking for a spot of quiet time will love Celestial All Suites. Whether it’s a do-not-disturbathon honeymoon or dozey afternoons with a book on a daybed you’re after, the peaceful vibe here will put your mind at…
Continue Reading
-
European office deals rebound as investors bet on supply crunch
Investors sank money in big European office deals again last year, with values and the number of transactions rebounding as the prospect of a supply crunch breathed new life into a once moribund sector.
A total of 21 transactions worth £100mn or more had completed in central London as of mid-December, compared with 12 for all of 2024. Nine office buildings were sold for £200mn or more, compared with just one in 2024.
Big deals accounted for a greater share of the market. Office building sales in central London worth £100mn or more were 53 per cent of total sales volumes as of mid December, up from 27 per cent for the whole of 2024, according to data from real estate broker Savills.
“Investors are feeling more confident” about putting money back into this space, particularly domestic funds and institutions, said Oliver Bamber, director for central London investment at Savills. Bamber is advising on the sale of St Christopher’s Place, a mixed-use office, residential and leisure estate, and Stirling Square, an office building. Both are in the West End and expected to sell for more than £200mn.
As of mid-December, there were 12 office deals worth £100mn or more under way in continental Europe and the UK, with a total value of €2.7bn. That compares with nine deals worth €1.87bn at the same point in 2024, according to data from MSCI, and eight worth €1.65bn in 2023.
“Despite the noise around work from home, actually the cranes have stopped for a number of years in key markets, presenting in critical markets like London a supply crunch,” said Nick Deacon, head of offices for Europe at Nuveen Real Estate.
“Demand has stayed up, supply is looking really difficult, we’re all anticipating rental growth and that’s fundamentally what people are buying into,” he added.
Nuveen in December sold its “Can of Ham” skyscraper in London to Hayfin and Capreon for about £340mn. The average office deal size in Europe is about €35mn, according to MSCI.
US asset manager Invesco has appointed broker CBRE to sell its Capital 8 complex in Paris’s 8th arrondissement, which could fetch about €900mn, according to people familiar with the matter.
Invesco acquired the nearly 500,000 sq ft building in 2018 and spent two years and €100mn redeveloping it. It now has a rooftop bar and a “hotel-inspired lobby”, according to the firm. Invesco and CBRE declined to comment.
A price tag of €900mn would represent the largest European office building sale in three years and the largest in France in five years. It joins other high-end assets that are being sold, a sign the market is creeping back after valuations crashed in the wake of the pandemic and high interest rates.
JPMorgan Asset Management and Singapore sovereign-wealth fund GIC, for example, are selling OpernTurm, an office tower in Frankfurt known for its good location and steady tenant base. It could fetch €800mn, according to people familiar with the transaction. JPMorgan and GIC declined to comment.
Both real estate investment manager Hines and developer Art-Invest Real Estate have looked at OpernTurm, according to people familiar with the matter. They declined to comment.
Meanwhile, Blackstone in September snapped up the Centre d’Affaires Paris Trocadéro, a mixed-use property including office and retail in the 16th arrondissement, for about €700mn.
“There’s real evidence of rental growth: we are seeing some prime rents in the City of London can be well north of £100 a foot, north of €1,200 a metre in Paris,” said Samir Amichi, Blackstone’s head of real estate acquisitions for Europe. “These are rents we hadn’t seen before.”
The Trocadéro sale is a “bellwether” for supersize deals, said Tom Leahy, head of real estate research for Emea at MSCI. “It’s emblematic of a broader recovery.”
Still, investors remain selective, with bidders focused on well-located buildings with attractive amenities in the top global cities.
Lars Huber, head of Europe at Hines, said capital completely dried up over the previous two or three years and has only started coming back recently.
“Investors are drawn to Europe right now because the interest rate environment has improved, construction costs are moderating, there’s less supply of top-quality office space and Europe provides geopolitical stability compared to other places.”
Traditional lenders are also more keen to lend, which is adding liquidity, he said.
In the first half of 2025, new commercial real estate lending in the UK totalled £22.3bn, up 33 per cent from the year before, according to research from Bayes Business School.
For the Trocadéro transaction, Blackstone’s loan-to-value ratio was 60 per cent, said a person familiar with the matter. A year and a half ago, it would have been hard to get leverage above 50 per cent LTV, the person said.
Continue Reading
-
Europe’s renewables push slowed by waits for links to grid, operator warns
Stay informed with free updates
Simply sign up to the EU energy myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.
The boss of one of Europe’s largest grid operators has warned that too many speculative and unprepared projects are holding up grid connections for critical energy projects and causing years-long queues.
Bernard Gustin, chief executive of Elia Group, which operates the Belgian and parts of the German grid, said that operators of network infrastructure should be able to allocate connections to projects that are ready, rather than those that applied first.
‘‘I think in Belgium we have 10 times more projects [than] needed until 2030,” he said, referring to battery storage projects. “If you change from first come, first served to first ready, first served, then you will focus on the ones who are really serious because they have everything [ready].”
Grid connections have become a huge issue for European countries. Many are trying to manage a rapid increase in demand for grid access as more industrial plants and households install wind and solar power that can go into the grid, as well as an increasing number of applications from data centres to use energy from it.
In some countries, such as the Netherlands, queues to be connected to the grid stretch more than seven years. In Slovakia, about 50 per cent of capacity reserved for connection remains unused, according to commission figures. In Germany, there are twice as many requests to add battery storage to the grid as is planned in the country’s grid development plan, an Elia Group report found.
The rollout of renewables in the EU has outpaced the infrastructure needed to support it, as countries race to meet renewable energy targets set by Brussels and move away from imported fossil fuels. The European Commission has estimated that €1.2tn needs to be spent on the EU’s grids by 2040 in order to support the transition.
Gustin said that grid operators are competing for funding to rapidly build out networks and upgrade infrastructure to balance the volatility of wind and solar energy.
After years of stagnant investment levels, “we all have huge capex plans, so big that you need to be able to finance them, which is a challenge”, he said.
Bernard Gustin: ‘If you change from first come, first served to first ready, first served, then you will focus on the ones who are really serious because they have everything [ready]’ © Jonas Roosens/Belga/AFP/Getty Images Costs from grid congestion — where cheap electricity cannot flow to where demand is so people have to pay for higher cost sources — are rising. Acer, the EU energy regulator, has said that they reached €5.2bn in 2022 and could rise to €26bn by 2030.
In a document published in December, Brussels set out recommendations to prioritise connections to the grid. The commission also said that it would take a more top-down approach to energy infrastructure planning in order to accelerate the build-out and ensure costs were shared between EU countries.
“In Europe it’s a huge problem and we lose billions every year in lost value because of curtailment and bottlenecks,” EU energy commissioner Dan Jørgensen told the Financial Times.
In a report on energy storage, Elia Group found that the first 100GW of installed batteries in Europe would reduce the curtailment of renewable power by 13 per cent, meaning that 13 per cent more power would be available.
A control room screen displaying Belgium’s electricity grid data © Jonas Roosens/BELGA MAG/AFP/Getty Images Elia plans to spend €31.6bn on grid upgrades until 2028, split roughly one-third to Belgium and two-thirds to its German arm. To deal with connection demands from batteries, data centres and renewable energy installations could cost an additional €10bn, Gustin estimated.
“These are not small amounts . . . you have a lot of people saying we don’t want tariffs to go up on energy, electricity is not competitive. And so we have a first challenge [which] is how do we make sure, given the amounts we need to raise, that we have a competitive return on equity?”
Gustin, who was formerly chief executive of Brussels Airlines, oversaw a €2.2bn capital raise earlier this year, bringing in investors such as BlackRock and the Canadian pension fund CPP.
Often the length of time it takes to grant permits for infrastructure projects is seen as a risk factor by investors, he said, with permitting times in Belgium running up to eight years.
“By [that] time inflation and the price have increased and some investors are telling you these were not the conditions we had at the start, we cannot continue,” he said.
The EU’s recent legislation aims to speed up permitting times by setting time limits for permit deliberations and proposing that energy projects should be seen as having an overriding interest.
Continue Reading
-
Investor urges corporate Japan to get over bubble-era ‘trauma’
Stay informed with free updates
Simply sign up to the Japanese business & finance myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.
Japan’s executives have to change their mindset and exert more pricing power as the country moves on from an era of deflation, one of its biggest independent asset managers has said.
Shuhei Abe, founder of asset manager Sparx, said he was looking to invest in companies and managers willing to emerge from a defensive crouch and raise prices in Japan’s changed economic landscape.
“Investors in this country have waited for years for inflation to return and now the time has come,” he said in an interview in Tokyo. “One of the biggest catalysts for the coming years will be changes of management attitude.”
His comments underline the change of mood among Japanese investors, who for years sought to pick stock market winners in an economy with barely any growth and entrenched deflation following the end of its asset price bubble in 1989.
However, in 2025 Japan’s stock market index has climbed decisively beyond its previous peaks while rising inflation has allowed the central bank to raise interest rates to the highest level in 30 years.
Managers of the previous era “suffered from the trauma of the past bubble” and had it instilled in them to cut debt and hoard capital rather than raise prices, Abe said.
“Most of the top management guys who joined [Japanese companies] during this time were trained . . . to reduce the debt, to not waste capital,” said Abe, a former employee of George Soros. “But finally, now, they have started to understand they cannot continue like they have over the past 30 years.”
Sparx has ¥2tn ($12.7bn) of assets under management. Among its investments Abe cites Morinaga, a confectioner benefiting from Japan’s boom in inbound tourism, and Shoei, a maker of premium motorcycle helmets, as benefiting from pricing power.
Abe is also invested in Pilot, one of the largest pen companies in the world, which has recently moved to satisfy some of Abe’s demands, raising the price of its best-selling pen in Japan by 10 per cent.
Most of Japan’s asset managers are riding the wave of stock price records over the past 18 months. Sparx, which was founded in 1989 just before the end of the bubble, managed in August to exceed its previous peak for assets under management, set 19 years earlier.
Its funds have recorded, over their lifetimes, annualised returns of between 4.7 per cent for its long-short fund and 11.4 per cent for its active long-only strategy. The Topix returned about 4.6 per cent over roughly the same period.
Japan’s average annual growth was less than 1 per cent for more than 30 years, Abe pointed out. “In this environment, it’s not easy to invest in any equity asset. So Sparx did very well in that sense. But, at the same time, no one else could do it, thus there was room for us.”
Before founding Sparx, Abe was funded by Soros in 1985 to invest in Japanese railroad stock, in a bet that the market would start to apply more value to the sector’s vast real estate holdings — a variant on a strategy that some activists and private equity groups are using in Japan today.
It is not just the end of a long period of stagnation that has put Japan back into investors’ sights. Regulators, the government and the stock exchange are pushing companies to pay more attention to shareholders.
The government is also pushing to improve the quality and quantity of asset managers, convinced that they are crucial to improving corporate performance and getting capital flowing.
Abe expects that a wave of retail investors will come into the market, with the side-effect that companies will have a powerful new constituency pushing them to perform.
“Individuals will move the market. Individuals will eventually be . . . a most powerful activist,” he said.
Continue Reading
-
US to extend productivity lead on back of AI boom, say economists
More than three-quarters of economists expect the US to maintain or widen its productivity lead over the rest of the world, because of artificial intelligence, deep capital markets and relatively low energy costs, a Financial Times survey has found.
In the global poll, 31 per cent of 183 respondents thought the US would retain its advantage in productivity, while another 48 per cent expected the country to increase its dominance.
The economists were based in China, the Eurozone, the UK and the US.
Productivity growth — which measures progress in converting inputs such as hours worked into goods and services — ultimately allows companies to increase wages and profits, improving living standards.
US labour productivity rose 10 per cent between 2019 and 2024, thanks to rapid technological advances and the reallocation of workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. By contrast, it remained largely stagnant in the UK and Eurozone, according to OECD data.
Jumana Saleheen, head of Vanguard’s investment strategy group in Europe, said US productivity was set to “pull away from other developed market economies” thanks to the country’s dynamic capital markets, flexible labour force and lead in emerging technologies.
She added that Europe risked “falling further behind”, with research and development still heavily focused on traditional sectors such as automotive and pharmaceuticals.
Saleheen also noted structural challenges for the EU, including fragmented infrastructure, more rigid labour markets and less supportive capital markets.
The US economy is set for the strongest growth in the G7 this year, according to the OECD — buoyed by a tech-led investment boom and stock market gains that are bolstering wealth and spending among better-off households.
The gains have helped counter some of the economic damage done by US President Donald Trump’s trade wars but have also raised fears of an unsustainable AI-related bubble.
The FT survey, which was carried out in December, suggests economists do not expect the trends powering US outperformance to be reversed soon.
AI and related digital technologies were the new productivity frontier, said Nina Skero, chief executive of the Centre for Economics and Business Research, and the US’s “position as a leader in investment and development of these technologies will extend the US’s productivity lead”.
The trend is supported by a divergence in business investment. In the US, investment jumped 24 per cent in the second quarter of 2025 compared with the same period in 2019, before the pandemic. It contracted 7 per cent over that time in the Eurozone, according to Oxford Economics.
Some economists surveyed by the FT warned that the surge in AI investment could reflect a “bubble” — a term mentioned 25 times in responses — and cautioned that a sharp correction might weigh on US output and productivity.
A reversal in the stock market gains made by US tech could also have international repercussions via tighter financial conditions, softer external demand and rising risk aversion, some economists said.
But the majority of respondents to the poll, which represented the UK and Eurozone more heavily than China and the US, still expected America to maintain its productivity edge globally. Overall, the poll surveyed 207 economists, although not all responded to every question.
The US was starting from a “position of strength” in the productivity race, said Thomas Simons, chief US economist at Jefferies.
Respondents also pointed to the US’s structurally lower and more predictable energy costs, flexible labour market and large domestic economy.
The US benefits from “structurally lower and more predictable energy costs than Europe and many Asian economies, underpinned by an administration that treats energy policy as a driver of economic prosperity rather than a vehicle for moral posturing at the expense of growth and living standards,” said Martin Beck, chief economist at the consultancy WPI Strategy.
Europe is widely seen by economists as constrained by over-regulation, weaker investment, rigid labour markets and a business environment less favourable to cutting-edge technologies. The UK had the additional weight of the Brexit legacy to deal with, some economists contended.
“While the US and others have made major strides in AI, the UK has spent much of the last decade chasing the Brexit tail, diverting attention and resources from innovation,” said Evarist Stoja, professor of finance at the University of Bristol Business School.
Experts acknowledge that the US faces rising AI competition from Asia. “Other countries — particularly in Asia — will move to the frontier, meaning that the relative advantage of the US will erode somewhat but will not be eliminated,” said Jagjit S Chadha, professor of economics at the University of Cambridge.
China has the second-largest cumulative venture capital investment in AI since 2012 after the US and over three times more than the EU, according to the OECD.
The US may be at the forefront of the AI wave, but “much of this may prove a misallocation of resources,” said David Owen, chief economist at Saltmarsh Economics. “Ultimately, much of the benefits will go to the users of the technology (elsewhere), not the early-stage innovators.”
Many economists also highlighted risks from US trade protectionism, restrictive immigration policies, fiscal imbalances and political instability that could eventually undermine productivity growth.
US productivity gains from trade “have been traded away for chump change tariff revenues”, warned Robert Barbera, director of the Johns Hopkins University Center for Financial Economics.
Jonathan Portes, professor of economics and public policy at King’s College in London, warned that a “toxic combination” of tariffs, an erosion of the quality of US government administration and anti-immigration policy would “over time do significant damage to the US economy”.
Additional reporting from Olaf Storbeck, Claire Jones and Thomas Hale
Video: The AI rollout is here – and it’s messy | FT Working ItContinue Reading
