Author: admin

  • Don’t trust councils’ online info about the Council Tax Carers Discount

    Don’t trust councils’ online info about the Council Tax Carers Discount

    Kit Sproson

    Kit Sproson

    Senior Money Writer – Mortgages Expert

    12 January 2026

    An investigation by MoneySavingExpert.com (MSE) into ‘the councils that couldn’t Care less’ has found that, in a spot check, at least 69 councils in England and Wales have information about the live-in Carer Council Tax discount on their websites that incorrectly indicates far fewer people are eligible than really are. This is likely to be putting off some of the millions of unpaid Carers from claiming what they’re legally entitled to.

    We checked the online information – websites, PDFs, application forms – of over 200 councils (there are 318 responsible for Council Tax billing in England and Wales). We found that:

    • 69 councils, including seven London boroughs, state incomplete – and therefore incorrect – criteria. This means a minimum of one in five councils are displaying incorrect info. This discount can knock 25% or 50% off a Council Tax bill – with a 25% discount typically worth £500 a year.

    • A further 80 councils failed to include ANY easily available information online about the qualifying benefits needed to get the discount.

    This is very likely to deter a decent chunk of the up to five million unpaid carers from claiming. Those eligible for this discount must be caring for someone who receives one of several disability benefits – but it’s some of the most common disability benefits that councils are missing from their info.  
     
    This affects a wide range of people, including those where a parent is looking after an adult child, an adult child looking after a parent, and adult siblings looking after an adult brother or sister.

    The likely cause of the problem is many councils haven’t updated their websites since Carer rules changed in 2013

    The live-in Carer Council Tax discount means the Carer is disregarded for Council Tax purposes. So, if they were the only person in the house with the person they’re caring for, it’s as if there’s only one person resident, so that household would be eligible for the 25% single person discount (this discount could increase if the person being cared for is eligible for the ‘Severe Mental Impairment’ disregard too).

    To qualify for the live-in Carer discount:  

    1. Applicants need to provide at least 35 hours of free care a week to somebody in their household who isn’t a spouse, partner or child under 18.

    2. The person being cared for needs to be receiving one of a number of qualifying benefits. Prior to the reforms in 2013, these were:

      – Attendance Allowance – higher rate.
      – Constant Attendance Allowance – increased amount.
      – Disability Living Allowance – care component, higher rate.
      – Disablement Pension – increased rate.

      Since 2013, it has also included the following – and it is these benefits that councils largely mistakenly excluded:

      – Armed Forces Independence Payment – any amount.
      – Attendance Allowance – lower rate.
      – Disability Living Allowance – care component, middle rate.
      – Personal Independence Payment – daily living component, enhanced rate.
      – Personal Independence Payment – daily living component, standard rate.  

      The qualifying benefits needed for the live-in Carer Council Tax discount differ in Scotland, so this has not formed part of our investigation.

    The investigation shows a majority of the 69 offending councils wrongly stated that people being cared for on these benefits:

    • Only qualify if they’re being paid the higher rate of Attendance Allowance, Disability Living Allowance and Personal Independence Payment.

    • Do not mention Armed Forces Independence Payment or Personal Independence Payment at all.

    • Or, in the worst cases, it’s a combination of these issues, plus more.

    Who’s most likely to be affected by the errors

    Carers most likely to be affected are those looking after someone who needs regular help and supervision, but not necessarily round-the-clock. In these cases, the person receiving care is more likely to be on the lower rates of the qualifying benefits – which were more often missed from councils’ eligibility info.

    Those providing 24/7 care could still be affected, though it’s somewhat less likely because the person being cared for should then be getting the highest rates of the qualifying benefits, which councils tended to include in their criteria.

    MSE was first alerted to the issue by a user who got in touch after telling us they were incorrectly rejected for the discount by their council and said they only managed to successfully claim with help from a specialist charity.

    Martin Lewis: ‘Unpaid carers who thought they weren’t eligible should check again’

    Martin Lewis

    Martin Lewis

    MSE founder & chair

    Unpaid carers can’t trust councils’ information about Carers’ Council Tax discounts. All Carers who thought they weren’t eligible after checking councils’ websites should check again (use Carers UK’s help pages). If you did miss out due to councils’ poor info, ask for a backdated discount to the point of first eligibility, though different councils have different rules. 
     
    Thirty-five hours a week of unpaid caring is no small feat. This army of up to five million carers provides a silent and often un-thanked backbone that takes a burden off the NHS and care system – reducing the cost to the state.

    While it’s often done out of love, that doesn’t mean it isn’t hard. And while this discount isn’t means-tested, many who are caring, unpaid, for at least 35 hours a week, are almost certainly under a great deal of financial stress. So, the idea that they’re being misled about £100s a year in discounts from their own councils really sticks in the craw. 
     
    This is made worse by the fact the main Gov.uk pages about Council Tax don’t list the qualifying benefits for the discount – making it harder for taxpayers in England to work out whether they might be eligible.

    We are writing to all the councils involved to ask them to urgently update their websites and to ensure their internal policies are compliant. I will also be reporting this information lapse to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. It should work with councils on a clear plan to guarantee that Council Tax information is clear, accurate and accessible.

    ‘Carers are often at a financial disadvantage’

    Helen Walker, chief executive at the charity Carers UK, said: “Unpaid carers provide support worth a staggering £184 billion to the UK economy each year, but this comes at a significant personal and financial cost. They are often at a financial disadvantage because caring for someone can impact your ability to work and additional expenses – such as specialist food and clothing, and higher electricity bills – add to everyday living costs.

    “Nearly half (49%) of unpaid carers have cut back on essentials in the past year and a third (32%) have taken out a loan from the bank, used credit cards or a bank overdraft. 60% of unpaid carers feel anxious or stressed when they think about their financial situation. Unpaid carers are frequently time poor and exhausted from the amount of administration they have to deal with in their caring roles.

    “It’s simply unacceptable that carers are presented with the wrong information when they are so urgently in need of help. It’s essential that they have the right facts about council tax discounts in front of them to help them claim what they’re entitled to. This could be a lifeline for many families, helping to relieve some of the pressure they feel and making an important difference to their ability to make ends meet.”

    Councils getting it wrong on the live-in Carer Council Tax discount

    List of councils with wrong info

    Region

    Council

    East Midlands

    Bolsover

    Derby

    Harborough

    High Peak

    Hinckley and Bosworth

    North West Leicestershire

    Rushcliffe

    South Derbyshire

    South Kesteven

    West Lindsey

    East of England

    Braintree

    Broxbourne

    Huntingdonshire

    North Hertfordshire

    North Norfolk

    Stevenage

    Uttlesford

    London

    Barnet

    Bromley

    Camden

    Haringey

    Hounslow

    Merton

    Waltham Forest

    North East

    Gateshead

    South Tyneside

    North West

    Blackpool

    Burnley

    Fylde

    Pendle

    Rossendale

    South East

    Adur

    Brighton and Hove

    Cherwell

    Chichester

    East Hampshire

    Fareham

    Gravesham

    Hart

    Runnymede

    Rushmoor

    Slough

    South Oxfordshire

    Spelthorne

    Swale

    Tandridge

    Tunbridge Wells

    Vale of White Horse

    Wealden

    West Berkshire

    Windsor and Maidenhead

    Worthing

    South West

    Cheltenham

    Gloucester

    North Somerset

    Plymouth

    Swindon

    West Midlands

    Lichfield

    Sandwell

    Staffordshire Moorlands

    Stoke-on-Trent

    Wyre Forest

    Yorkshire and the Humber

    Calderdale

    North East Lincolnshire

    North Yorkshire

    Sheffield

    Wakefield

    Wales

    Denbighshire

    Merthyr Tydfil

    Continue Reading

  • Jupiter Opposition IV: January 11, 2026 – StarDate Online

    1. Jupiter Opposition IV: January 11, 2026  StarDate Online
    2. The Sky Today on Saturday, January 10: Jupiter reaches opposition  Astronomy Magazine
    3. What’s Up: January 2026 Skywatching Tips from NASA  NASA Science (.gov)
    4. Astro Bob: Catch Jupiter at its…

    Continue Reading

  • 39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    Two thirds of UK adults believe the next generation will suffer poorer health due to ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and 39% would like to see them banned, a survey suggests.

    Some 59% of adults believe UPFs are “impossible to avoid” when…

    Continue Reading

  • Iran Tensions Fuel Worries in Oil Market – The Wall Street Journal

    1. Iran Tensions Fuel Worries in Oil Market  The Wall Street Journal
    2. Oil gains as market weighs Iran, Russia supply risks  Business Recorder
    3. Oil Prices Rise for Second Straight Day in Global Market  8171ip.com.pk
    4. WTI climbs above $59.00 amid Middle East tensions  FXStreet
    5. Brent Edges Higher on Iran Protests  TradingView — Track All Markets

    Continue Reading

  • Nationwide Building Society | building society





    Nationwide Building Society | building society | Nationwide




    Nationwide Building Society

    To try again, please refresh this page.

    To go directly to our website homepage, click
    www.nationwide.co.uk, or type into your search bar.

    20260112T002942Z-r1f6b5589648xds5hC1AMSs1780000000e1g00000000d2uv


    Continue Reading

  • Why luxury carmakers are now building glitzy skyscrapers

    Why luxury carmakers are now building glitzy skyscrapers

    Sameer HashmiBusiness reporter, Dubai

    Binghatti Properties The Bugatti Residences building under construction in Dubai Binghatti Properties

    The Bugatti Residences building in Dubai is currently under construction

    Bugatti is synonymous with high-performance, ultra-expensive supercars. But now the luxury French brand is entering a very different kind of race – not on the track, but in the skyline.

    In the heart of Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, Bugatti is building its first residential tower.

    With the cheapest apartments set to cost $5.2m (£3.9m), the company is entering a fast-growing marketplace for the world’s super rich – branded residences.

    Being constructed by a growing number of luxury firms, including fellow carmakers Porsche and Aston Martin, they typically offer glitzy, fully-furnished apartments, where the company’s brand name or logo is often prominently, and repeatedly, on show.

    Other businesses that have entered the sector are Swiss watch firm Jacob & Co, and Italian fashion houses Fendi and Missoni.

    Bugatti is building its 43-storey Dubai tower in partnership with UAE-based developer Binghatti Properties. The most expensive penthouses in the Bugatti Residences By Binghatti building will include large, private lifts for the owner’s cars, so they can park them inside their apartments.

    “For many car or watch enthusiasts, it’s not just about owning the vehicle or the timepiece, but experiencing the brand in their everyday life through real estate,” says Muhammed BinGhatti, chairman of Binghatti Properties.

    The buyer list for the Bugatti project includes Brazilian football star Neymar Junior and opera singer Andrea Bocelli, adds Mr BinGhatti. Neymar is said to have paid $54m for one of the penthouses.

    Global demand for branded residences has “accelerated” in the past two years, according to a new report by estate agent company Knight Frank.

    It adds that while there were 169 such schemes in 2011, today there are 611, and the number is forecast to rise to 1,019 by 2030.

    Binghatti Properties An artist's impression of how the Bugatti Residences building will look at night when it has been completedBinghatti Properties

    The cheapest apartments in the the Bugatti Residents building will cost $5.2m

    Currently, the US has the highest number of branded apartment buildings, centered on the skylines of Miami and New York, but Knight Frank says that the Middle East, in second place, is seeing the biggest growth. It says this is being “driven largely by rapid expansion in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia”.

    “Branded residences appeal most to individuals with extreme brand loyalty – people who want to live and breathe a particular brand,” says Faisal Durrani, head of research at Knight Frank Middle East.

    On a city-by-city basis, Dubai in the UAE now leads the way when it comes to the number of branded residences projects in development, according to a separate report on the sector by fellow property firm Savills.

    This is said to be fueled by the continuing high number of wealthy people relocating to the city and purchasing luxury homes.

    Durrani adds that prices for branded apartments in low-tax Dubai are often cheaper than elsewhere in the world. He describes the cost of such properties in the city as “extremely affordable compared with cities like New York and London”.

    Aston Martin One of the apartment interiors at Aston Martin Residences in MiamiAston Martin

    Aston Martin’s residential tower in Miami opened in 2024

    Until recently, branded residences were dominated by hotel chains such as Four Seasons and Ritz-Carlton, but luxury consumer brands are now increasingly leading the sector.

    Porsche’s Design Tower in Miami opened in 2017, while Aston Martin’s Residences Miami launched last year, and Jacob & Co’s project on Al Marjan Island in the UAE is due to be ready in 2027.

    For such companies, real estate offers a new revenue stream with relatively low risk, as property development partners handle construction, and buyers pay a premium for the aesthetic and exclusivity associated with their brand.

    According to BinGhatti, branded apartments are typically between 30 and 40% more expensive than non-branded luxury homes.

    Many new branded schemes feature private members’ clubs, wellness facilities and exclusive services – from chauffeured cars and yacht access, to private jet partnerships.

    A new tier of branded properties is also being marketed around shared passions like gastronomy, wellness, and even longevity science.

    In London, the forthcoming Six Senses Residences in Bayswater, being built by the Six Senses hotel chain, will include a biohacking centre. This will offer therapies including as cryotherapy, or extreme cold treatment, which is marketed as boosting energy levels and enhancing skin tone.

    Meanwhile, in Texas, Discovery Land Company’s upcoming residential Austin Surf Club is centred around a vast man-made surf lagoon.

    AFP via Getty Images The Porsche Design Tower in Miami, black, centre, opened in 2017AFP via Getty Images

    The Porsche Designer Tower, black, centre, opened in Miami in 2017

    Business and consumer psychology experts say the boom in luxury branded apartments reflects a broader desire for social signalling and exclusivity.

    Giana Eckhardt, a professor of marketing at King’s College London, argues that such homes have become a new form of “social status currency”, akin to a rare handbag or huge diamond ring.

    “Ultra-wealthy consumers increasingly want status assets and goods that are not available to everyone,” she says.

    Eckhardt who specialises in consumer behaviour, branding and consumer culture, adds that luxury brands communicate a “person’s place in a social hierarchy”. “They want the social rewards that come with being associated with these brands,” she adds.

    BinGhatti agrees that exclusivity is central to the appeal. “Clients really get the highest level of exclusivity.

    “Every unit is unique and that gives them a special feeling of owning a one-of-a-kind [apartment] across the entire planet.”

    Yet business psychologist Stuart Duff, of UK firm Pearn Kandola, cautions that many people may find the idea of branded apartments to not be in good taste, especially if the brand name is excessively on show.

    “Having the presence of a brand everywhere within an apartment block could well reduce the perception of rarity and uniqueness, and lead to a feeling of bragging. And at worst being seen as vulgar and tacky.”

    Read more global business stories

    Continue Reading

  • Demystifying trade patterns in a fragmenting world

    Since the rise of US–China trade tensions, there has been a growing debate on the impact of rising trade barriers on global and bilateral trade patterns (Aiyar and Ilyina 2023, Aiyar et al. 2023, Alfaro and Chor 2023, Freund et al. 2023, Freund et al. 2024) against a backdrop of the public debate on deglobalisation (Baldwin 2022). Geoeconomic fragmentation poses losses to all countries in the medium-to-long term, but may lead to different trade dynamics among countries in the short term. It has been argued that ‘connector’ countries benefit from bridging the gap between trade blocs – for example, by increasing exports to the US as they substitute for declining US sourcing from China while at the same time increasing imports from China (Fajgelbaum et al. 2023, Fajgelbaum et al. 2024, Freund et al. 2023, Freund et al. 2024, Gopinath et al. 2025). However, it is not clear (a) whether such connector countries do indeed serve as bridges, as the increasing imports from China may reflect other factors; and (b) even if such ‘bridging the gap’ effects exist, through which channels they operate. Two possible channels are:

    • Trade reallocation: connector countries produce more goods domestically to export to the US – with rising domestic value added – as the US shifts away from China, likely using intermediate inputs imported from China.
    • Trade rerouting: connector countries serve as a one‑stop place for Chinese exports to the US – with minimal to no domestic value added, in the extreme case through transshipment – to circumvent trade barriers.

    Separating these channels is important. Trade reallocation could benefit the domestic economy at least in the short term as it increases domestic production for exports. Conversely, trade rerouting involves minimal or no domestic production activities and may result in harmful countervailing trade restrictions. In a recent paper (Schulze and Xin 2025), we provide a nuanced assessment of the changing trade patterns during 2018 and 2022 by disentangling these two channels and examining the spillover consequences of the higher US tariffs on China in 2018 for a sample of six Asian emerging markets (India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam).

    Trade reallocation in some countries, but no evidence of trade rerouting on a significant scale

    We first document that the positive correlation between these countries’ imports from China and exports to the US may reflect other forces at play, such as Chinese supply chain reconfiguration and growing domestic markets, and not necessarily their connector roles in bridging the gap between China and the US.

    We then leverage the Eora global supply chain database, which captures global production linkages, to construct two value-added measures of each country’s exports to the US between 1990 and 2022: (1) the share of domestic value added, and (2) the share of Chinese value added. We use a synthetic control approach to estimate the effect of US-China trade tensions on these measures, especially for strategic sectors that have been most affected by the US tariffs on Chinese exports.
    Compared to the synthetic counterfactual, a higher share of domestic value added in a country’s exports to the US would suggest evidence of trade reallocation, i.e. domestic production expanding and more domestic content being embedded in the country’s exports to the US. On the other hand, a lower share of Chinese value added in a country’s exports to the US would suggest no evidence of trade rerouting on a significant scale.

    Vietnam appears to have benefited from the trade reallocation effect during 2018-2022 – significantly increasing its domestic value added (Figure 1) and reducing Chinese value added in its strategic sector exports to the US – rather than trade rerouting from China. Specifically, Vietnam saw statistically significant increases in the share of domestic value added in its exports to the US (6 and 7 percentage points higher than its synthetic counterfactual in 2018 for the “electrical and machinery” sector and “petroleum, chemical and non-metallic mineral products” sectors, respectively, and 10 and 12 percentage points higher in 2022). This suggests that Vietnam has increased domestic production for its strategic sectors’ exports and has thus been able to embed more domestic content in its exports to the US. On the other hand, Vietnam saw a statistically significant decline in the share of Chinese value added in its strategic sectors’ exports to the US, suggesting no evidence of trade rerouting from China to the US on a significant scale.

    Figure 1 Estimated effect on the share of domestic value added in the country’s exports to the US: Electrical and machinery (percentage points)

    Notes: For each country, the figure plots the estimated effect on the share of domestic value added in the country’s exports to the US (the blue lines) and the 10th − 90th percentile range of the placebo test distribution (the grey areas).
    Sources: The Eora Global Supply Chain Database (Lenzen et al. 2012, 2013); Aslam et al. (2017); authors’ calculations.

    Moreover, Vietnam has been able to export more domestic content not only to the US but also globally (Figure 2), though the effects on the latter are slightly smaller and take longer to become statistically significant. This suggests that, beyond increasing its domestic content in bilateral exports to the US, Vietnam managed to expand its domestic production capacity to capture a larger share in the global market.

    Figure 2 Share of domestic value added in Vietnam’s exports to the world: Electrical and machinery (percentage points)

    Notes: Panel (a) plot the actual (the blue line) and the synthetic counterfactual (the grey line) share of domestic value added in Vietnam’s exports to the world, and Panel (b) plots the estimated effect (the blue lines) and the 10th − 90th percentile range of the placebo test distribution (the grey areas).
    Sources: The Eora Global Supply Chain Database (Lenzen et al. 2012, 2013); Aslam et al. (2017); authors’ calculations.

    Trade reallocation in Vietnam is partly linked to Chinese firms relocating through FDI

    We extend our analysis to foreign direct investment (FDI) by examining the cumulative number of greenfield FDI projects that commit Chinese capital to Vietnam. Vietnam attracted more greenfield FDI projects in strategic sectors from China after 2018 (Figure 3), which has likely contributed to the scaling up of domestic production of its exports: Chinese firms have relocated their production – or accelerated a relocation process that started before due to higher domestic labour costs – to Vietnam against the backdrop of increasing US tariffs on China.

    Figure 3 Cumulative number of greenfield FDI projects that commit Chinese capital to Vietnam: Electrical and machinery  

    Notes: Panel (a) plot the actual (the blue line) and the synthetic counterfactual (the grey line) of the cumulative number of greenfield FDI projects that commit Chinese capital to Vietnam. Panel (b) plots the estimated effect on the cumulative number of greenfield FDI projects that commit Chinese capital to Vietnam for electrical and machinery sector since 2003 (the blue lines) and the 10th − 90th percentile range of the placebo test distribution (the grey areas).
    Sources: The Orbis Cross-border Investment Database and authors’ calculations.

    Taken together, Vietnam appears to have benefited from the trade reallocation effect by increasing its domestic production – partly supported by Chinese FDI but also by its favourable structural characteristics – and embedding more domestic content in its exports to the US and the rest of the world. Meanwhile, the evidence suggests that Vietnam has not served as a one‑stop place allowing China to reroute its exports to the US on a significant scale. As for the other five Asian countries, the impacts of the US–China trade tensions are elusive.

    Conclusion

    We provide a nuanced assessment of changing global trade patterns against the backdrop of increasing geoeconomic fragmentation, by zooming in on connector countries, delving into the value‑added trade, and distinguishing between trade reallocation and trade rerouting effects. Some countries, such as Vietnam, have experienced trade reallocation rather than trade rerouting, supported by rising domestic production and stronger inward FDI. Despite potential short-term gains, trade reallocation increases connector countries’ vulnerability to geoeconomic fragmentation, with losses for all countries in the long run.

    Authors’ note: The views expressed in this column are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. 

    References

    Alfaro, L, and D Chor (2023), “A perspective on the great reallocation of global supply chains”, VoxEU.org, September.

    Alfaro, L and D Chor (2023), “Global Supply Chains: The Looming ‘Great Reallocation’”, NBER Working Paper No. 31661.

    Aiyar, S and A Ilyina (2023), “Geo-economic fragmentation: What it means for multilateralism”, VoxEU.org, March.

    Aiyar, S, J Chen, C Ebeke, R Garcia-Saltos, T Gudmundsson, A Ilyina, A Kangur, S Rodriguez, M Ruta, T Schulze, J Trevino, T Kunaratskul and G Soderberg (2023), “Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism”, IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/2023/01.

    Aslam, A, N Novta, and F Rodrigues-Bastos (2017), “Calculating Trade in Value Added”, IMF Working Paper No. 2017/178.

    Baldwin, R (2022), “The Peak Globalisation Myth,” VoxEU.org.

    Fajgelbaum, P, P Goldberg, P Kennedy, A Khandelwal, and D Taglioni (2023), “The ‘bystander effect’ of the US-China trade war”, VoxEU.org, June.

    Fajgelbaum, P, P Goldberg, P Kennedy, A Khandelwal, and D Taglioni (2024), “The US-China trade war and global reallocations”, American Economic Review: Insights 6(2): 295-312.

    Freund, C, A Mattoo, A Mulabdic, and M Ruta (2023), “US-China decoupling: Rhetoric and reality”, VoxEU.org, August.

    Freund, C, A Mattoo, A Mulabdic, and M Ruta (2024), “Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains?”, Journal of International Economics 152, 104011.

    Gaulier, G and S Zignago (2010), “Baci: international trade database at the product-level (the 1994-2007 version)”.

    Gopinath, G, P Gourinchas, A Presbitero, and P Topalova (2025), “Changing global linkages: A new Cold War?”, Journal of International Economics 153, 104042.

    IMF – International Monetary Fund (2023), 2023 April World Economic Outlook.

    Lenzen, M, K Kanemoto, D Moran, and A Geschke (2012), “Mapping the structure of the world economy”, Environmental Science & Technology 46(15): 8374-8381.

    Lenzen, M, D Moran, K Kanemoto, and A Geschke (2013), “Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution”, Economic Systems Research 25(1): 20-49.

    Schulze, T and W Xin (2025). “Demystifying Trade Patterns in a Fragmenting World”, IMF Working Paper No. 2025/129.

    Continue Reading

  • Andrew Clements, Guardian’s classical music critic, dies aged 75 | Classical music

    Andrew Clements, Guardian’s classical music critic, dies aged 75 | Classical music

    The Guardian’s long-serving and much admired classical music critic Andrew Clements died on Sunday aged 75 after a period of illness.

    Clements joined the Guardian arts team in August 1993, succeeding Edward Greenfield as the paper’s chief…

    Continue Reading

  • UK business confidence weakened and hiring fell at end of 2025, surveys find | Economics

    UK business confidence weakened and hiring fell at end of 2025, surveys find | Economics

    UK business confidence weakened sharply at the end of 2025 and hiring fell amid rising costs and uncertainty about the economic outlook, according to key business surveys.

    Contrasting with the prime minister’s optimistic new year message that the country was about to start feeling richer again, the jobs market weakened, with full-time and temporary appointments falling in December, according to a study by the accountants KPMG and the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC).

    Jon Holt, the group chief executive of KPMG, said: “The jobs market at the end of 2025 was still signalling caution. After a long stretch of rising cost pressures and higher global economic uncertainty, many firms continue to pause hiring and are flexing where they can by using temporary staff.

    “As we head into the new year, this restraint is likely to remain in the near term.”

    Meanwhile, UK business confidence weakened sharply at the end of 2025, according to the latest business trends report from BDO, with the accountancy firm’s “optimism index” falling to its lowest level in nearly five years.

    Scott Knight, the head of growth at BDO, said: “Business costs are rising and turnover expectations are falling; it’s no wonder that optimism is on the floor. Decisive action like further interest rate deductions and a clear roadmap of what’s ahead is critical if they’re to grow and invest.”

    Keir Starmer kicked off 2026 with a series of briefings about how Britons would soon notice an improving economy, with claims his government had succeeded in bringing down living costs because of cuts to energy bills and interest rates as well as the end of the two-child benefit cap.

    There was also mixed news for Downing Street from a third economic survey, showing that Britain’s manufacturers believe the introduction of the government’s industrial strategy last year will boost their growth prospects in 2026.

    A majority of manufacturers believe the opportunities for their business to succeed outweigh the risks this year, according to an annual survey from the sector’s trade body Make UK and the accounting group PwC.

    However, Make UK said the survey also signalled that the significant increases in business costs, especially on employment and energy, were threatening to reach “a tipping point whereby investment plans will be cancelled or shifted overseas”.

    Stephen Phipson, the chief executive of Make UK, said manufacturers could only thrive “in the most favourable business environment”.

    He said: “Despite the commitment to an industrial strategy, not only is growth anaemic but the warning lights are now flashing red on the UK as a competitive place to manufacture and invest. The government promised significant change; now is the time to deliver it.”

    Continue Reading

  • 39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    UPFs often contain high levels of saturated fat, salt, sugar and additives, which experts say leaves less room in people’s diets for more nutritious foods (Alamy/PA)

    Two thirds of UK adults believe the next generation will suffer…

    Continue Reading