Author: admin

  • ANZ expands partnership with Tennis Australia, unveils ANZ Arena

    ANZ expands partnership with Tennis Australia, unveils ANZ Arena

    ANZ has expanded its partnership with Tennis Australia, becoming the Official Bank of the Australian Open in a landmark multi-year global agreement.   

    The agreement builds on…

    Continue Reading

  • Upcoming Okanagan aircraft maintenance school under consideration

    Upcoming Okanagan aircraft maintenance school under consideration

    Upcoming Okanagan aircraft maintenance school under consideration

    Published 4:30 pm Sunday, January 11, 2026

    A…

    Continue Reading

  • Person with measles traveled through Maryland, Virginia last week, health officials say

    Person with measles traveled through Maryland, Virginia last week, health officials say

    The Maryland Department of Health said the person traveled on trains from Jan. 7-8.

    A confirmed case of measles…

    Continue Reading

  • No. 21 West Virginia Rolls Past California Baptist

    No. 21 West Virginia Rolls Past California Baptist

    MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – The No. 21 West Virginia University wrestling team defeated the California Baptist Lancers, 29-10, at the Mt. SAC Gym on the campus of Mt. San Antonio College in Walnut, California, on Sunday.
     
    West Virginia (7-2, 2-1 Big…

    Continue Reading

  • Aggies Post 193.250 In Season Opening Tri Meet At Arizona State

    Aggies Post 193.250 In Season Opening Tri Meet At Arizona State

    Score: UC Davis 193.250 (3rd); San Jose State 195.175 (1st); Arizona State 195.100…

    Continue Reading

  • Don’t trust councils’ online info about the Council Tax Carers Discount

    Don’t trust councils’ online info about the Council Tax Carers Discount

    Kit Sproson

    Kit Sproson

    Senior Money Writer – Mortgages Expert

    12 January 2026

    An investigation by MoneySavingExpert.com (MSE) into ‘the councils that couldn’t Care less’ has found that, in a spot check, at least 69 councils in England and Wales have information about the live-in Carer Council Tax discount on their websites that incorrectly indicates far fewer people are eligible than really are. This is likely to be putting off some of the millions of unpaid Carers from claiming what they’re legally entitled to.

    We checked the online information – websites, PDFs, application forms – of over 200 councils (there are 318 responsible for Council Tax billing in England and Wales). We found that:

    • 69 councils, including seven London boroughs, state incomplete – and therefore incorrect – criteria. This means a minimum of one in five councils are displaying incorrect info. This discount can knock 25% or 50% off a Council Tax bill – with a 25% discount typically worth £500 a year.

    • A further 80 councils failed to include ANY easily available information online about the qualifying benefits needed to get the discount.

    This is very likely to deter a decent chunk of the up to five million unpaid carers from claiming. Those eligible for this discount must be caring for someone who receives one of several disability benefits – but it’s some of the most common disability benefits that councils are missing from their info.  
     
    This affects a wide range of people, including those where a parent is looking after an adult child, an adult child looking after a parent, and adult siblings looking after an adult brother or sister.

    The likely cause of the problem is many councils haven’t updated their websites since Carer rules changed in 2013

    The live-in Carer Council Tax discount means the Carer is disregarded for Council Tax purposes. So, if they were the only person in the house with the person they’re caring for, it’s as if there’s only one person resident, so that household would be eligible for the 25% single person discount (this discount could increase if the person being cared for is eligible for the ‘Severe Mental Impairment’ disregard too).

    To qualify for the live-in Carer discount:  

    1. Applicants need to provide at least 35 hours of free care a week to somebody in their household who isn’t a spouse, partner or child under 18.

    2. The person being cared for needs to be receiving one of a number of qualifying benefits. Prior to the reforms in 2013, these were:

      – Attendance Allowance – higher rate.
      – Constant Attendance Allowance – increased amount.
      – Disability Living Allowance – care component, higher rate.
      – Disablement Pension – increased rate.

      Since 2013, it has also included the following – and it is these benefits that councils largely mistakenly excluded:

      – Armed Forces Independence Payment – any amount.
      – Attendance Allowance – lower rate.
      – Disability Living Allowance – care component, middle rate.
      – Personal Independence Payment – daily living component, enhanced rate.
      – Personal Independence Payment – daily living component, standard rate.  

      The qualifying benefits needed for the live-in Carer Council Tax discount differ in Scotland, so this has not formed part of our investigation.

    The investigation shows a majority of the 69 offending councils wrongly stated that people being cared for on these benefits:

    • Only qualify if they’re being paid the higher rate of Attendance Allowance, Disability Living Allowance and Personal Independence Payment.

    • Do not mention Armed Forces Independence Payment or Personal Independence Payment at all.

    • Or, in the worst cases, it’s a combination of these issues, plus more.

    Who’s most likely to be affected by the errors

    Carers most likely to be affected are those looking after someone who needs regular help and supervision, but not necessarily round-the-clock. In these cases, the person receiving care is more likely to be on the lower rates of the qualifying benefits – which were more often missed from councils’ eligibility info.

    Those providing 24/7 care could still be affected, though it’s somewhat less likely because the person being cared for should then be getting the highest rates of the qualifying benefits, which councils tended to include in their criteria.

    MSE was first alerted to the issue by a user who got in touch after telling us they were incorrectly rejected for the discount by their council and said they only managed to successfully claim with help from a specialist charity.

    Martin Lewis: ‘Unpaid carers who thought they weren’t eligible should check again’

    Martin Lewis

    Martin Lewis

    MSE founder & chair

    Unpaid carers can’t trust councils’ information about Carers’ Council Tax discounts. All Carers who thought they weren’t eligible after checking councils’ websites should check again (use Carers UK’s help pages). If you did miss out due to councils’ poor info, ask for a backdated discount to the point of first eligibility, though different councils have different rules. 
     
    Thirty-five hours a week of unpaid caring is no small feat. This army of up to five million carers provides a silent and often un-thanked backbone that takes a burden off the NHS and care system – reducing the cost to the state.

    While it’s often done out of love, that doesn’t mean it isn’t hard. And while this discount isn’t means-tested, many who are caring, unpaid, for at least 35 hours a week, are almost certainly under a great deal of financial stress. So, the idea that they’re being misled about £100s a year in discounts from their own councils really sticks in the craw. 
     
    This is made worse by the fact the main Gov.uk pages about Council Tax don’t list the qualifying benefits for the discount – making it harder for taxpayers in England to work out whether they might be eligible.

    We are writing to all the councils involved to ask them to urgently update their websites and to ensure their internal policies are compliant. I will also be reporting this information lapse to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. It should work with councils on a clear plan to guarantee that Council Tax information is clear, accurate and accessible.

    ‘Carers are often at a financial disadvantage’

    Helen Walker, chief executive at the charity Carers UK, said: “Unpaid carers provide support worth a staggering £184 billion to the UK economy each year, but this comes at a significant personal and financial cost. They are often at a financial disadvantage because caring for someone can impact your ability to work and additional expenses – such as specialist food and clothing, and higher electricity bills – add to everyday living costs.

    “Nearly half (49%) of unpaid carers have cut back on essentials in the past year and a third (32%) have taken out a loan from the bank, used credit cards or a bank overdraft. 60% of unpaid carers feel anxious or stressed when they think about their financial situation. Unpaid carers are frequently time poor and exhausted from the amount of administration they have to deal with in their caring roles.

    “It’s simply unacceptable that carers are presented with the wrong information when they are so urgently in need of help. It’s essential that they have the right facts about council tax discounts in front of them to help them claim what they’re entitled to. This could be a lifeline for many families, helping to relieve some of the pressure they feel and making an important difference to their ability to make ends meet.”

    Councils getting it wrong on the live-in Carer Council Tax discount

    List of councils with wrong info

    Region

    Council

    East Midlands

    Bolsover

    Derby

    Harborough

    High Peak

    Hinckley and Bosworth

    North West Leicestershire

    Rushcliffe

    South Derbyshire

    South Kesteven

    West Lindsey

    East of England

    Braintree

    Broxbourne

    Huntingdonshire

    North Hertfordshire

    North Norfolk

    Stevenage

    Uttlesford

    London

    Barnet

    Bromley

    Camden

    Haringey

    Hounslow

    Merton

    Waltham Forest

    North East

    Gateshead

    South Tyneside

    North West

    Blackpool

    Burnley

    Fylde

    Pendle

    Rossendale

    South East

    Adur

    Brighton and Hove

    Cherwell

    Chichester

    East Hampshire

    Fareham

    Gravesham

    Hart

    Runnymede

    Rushmoor

    Slough

    South Oxfordshire

    Spelthorne

    Swale

    Tandridge

    Tunbridge Wells

    Vale of White Horse

    Wealden

    West Berkshire

    Windsor and Maidenhead

    Worthing

    South West

    Cheltenham

    Gloucester

    North Somerset

    Plymouth

    Swindon

    West Midlands

    Lichfield

    Sandwell

    Staffordshire Moorlands

    Stoke-on-Trent

    Wyre Forest

    Yorkshire and the Humber

    Calderdale

    North East Lincolnshire

    North Yorkshire

    Sheffield

    Wakefield

    Wales

    Denbighshire

    Merthyr Tydfil

    Continue Reading

  • Jupiter Opposition IV: January 11, 2026 – StarDate Online

    1. Jupiter Opposition IV: January 11, 2026  StarDate Online
    2. The Sky Today on Saturday, January 10: Jupiter reaches opposition  Astronomy Magazine
    3. What’s Up: January 2026 Skywatching Tips from NASA  NASA Science (.gov)
    4. Astro Bob: Catch Jupiter at its…

    Continue Reading

  • 39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    39% of adults want to see ultra-processed foods banned – survey

    Two thirds of UK adults believe the next generation will suffer poorer health due to ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and 39% would like to see them banned, a survey suggests.

    Some 59% of adults believe UPFs are “impossible to avoid” when…

    Continue Reading

  • Iran Tensions Fuel Worries in Oil Market – The Wall Street Journal

    1. Iran Tensions Fuel Worries in Oil Market  The Wall Street Journal
    2. Oil gains as market weighs Iran, Russia supply risks  Business Recorder
    3. Oil Prices Rise for Second Straight Day in Global Market  8171ip.com.pk
    4. WTI climbs above $59.00 amid Middle East tensions  FXStreet
    5. Brent Edges Higher on Iran Protests  TradingView — Track All Markets

    Continue Reading

  • Why luxury carmakers are now building glitzy skyscrapers

    Why luxury carmakers are now building glitzy skyscrapers

    Sameer HashmiBusiness reporter, Dubai

    Binghatti Properties The Bugatti Residences building under construction in Dubai Binghatti Properties

    The Bugatti Residences building in Dubai is currently under construction

    Bugatti is synonymous with high-performance, ultra-expensive supercars. But now the luxury French brand is entering a very different kind of race – not on the track, but in the skyline.

    In the heart of Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates, Bugatti is building its first residential tower.

    With the cheapest apartments set to cost $5.2m (£3.9m), the company is entering a fast-growing marketplace for the world’s super rich – branded residences.

    Being constructed by a growing number of luxury firms, including fellow carmakers Porsche and Aston Martin, they typically offer glitzy, fully-furnished apartments, where the company’s brand name or logo is often prominently, and repeatedly, on show.

    Other businesses that have entered the sector are Swiss watch firm Jacob & Co, and Italian fashion houses Fendi and Missoni.

    Bugatti is building its 43-storey Dubai tower in partnership with UAE-based developer Binghatti Properties. The most expensive penthouses in the Bugatti Residences By Binghatti building will include large, private lifts for the owner’s cars, so they can park them inside their apartments.

    “For many car or watch enthusiasts, it’s not just about owning the vehicle or the timepiece, but experiencing the brand in their everyday life through real estate,” says Muhammed BinGhatti, chairman of Binghatti Properties.

    The buyer list for the Bugatti project includes Brazilian football star Neymar Junior and opera singer Andrea Bocelli, adds Mr BinGhatti. Neymar is said to have paid $54m for one of the penthouses.

    Global demand for branded residences has “accelerated” in the past two years, according to a new report by estate agent company Knight Frank.

    It adds that while there were 169 such schemes in 2011, today there are 611, and the number is forecast to rise to 1,019 by 2030.

    Binghatti Properties An artist's impression of how the Bugatti Residences building will look at night when it has been completedBinghatti Properties

    The cheapest apartments in the the Bugatti Residents building will cost $5.2m

    Currently, the US has the highest number of branded apartment buildings, centered on the skylines of Miami and New York, but Knight Frank says that the Middle East, in second place, is seeing the biggest growth. It says this is being “driven largely by rapid expansion in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia”.

    “Branded residences appeal most to individuals with extreme brand loyalty – people who want to live and breathe a particular brand,” says Faisal Durrani, head of research at Knight Frank Middle East.

    On a city-by-city basis, Dubai in the UAE now leads the way when it comes to the number of branded residences projects in development, according to a separate report on the sector by fellow property firm Savills.

    This is said to be fueled by the continuing high number of wealthy people relocating to the city and purchasing luxury homes.

    Durrani adds that prices for branded apartments in low-tax Dubai are often cheaper than elsewhere in the world. He describes the cost of such properties in the city as “extremely affordable compared with cities like New York and London”.

    Aston Martin One of the apartment interiors at Aston Martin Residences in MiamiAston Martin

    Aston Martin’s residential tower in Miami opened in 2024

    Until recently, branded residences were dominated by hotel chains such as Four Seasons and Ritz-Carlton, but luxury consumer brands are now increasingly leading the sector.

    Porsche’s Design Tower in Miami opened in 2017, while Aston Martin’s Residences Miami launched last year, and Jacob & Co’s project on Al Marjan Island in the UAE is due to be ready in 2027.

    For such companies, real estate offers a new revenue stream with relatively low risk, as property development partners handle construction, and buyers pay a premium for the aesthetic and exclusivity associated with their brand.

    According to BinGhatti, branded apartments are typically between 30 and 40% more expensive than non-branded luxury homes.

    Many new branded schemes feature private members’ clubs, wellness facilities and exclusive services – from chauffeured cars and yacht access, to private jet partnerships.

    A new tier of branded properties is also being marketed around shared passions like gastronomy, wellness, and even longevity science.

    In London, the forthcoming Six Senses Residences in Bayswater, being built by the Six Senses hotel chain, will include a biohacking centre. This will offer therapies including as cryotherapy, or extreme cold treatment, which is marketed as boosting energy levels and enhancing skin tone.

    Meanwhile, in Texas, Discovery Land Company’s upcoming residential Austin Surf Club is centred around a vast man-made surf lagoon.

    AFP via Getty Images The Porsche Design Tower in Miami, black, centre, opened in 2017AFP via Getty Images

    The Porsche Designer Tower, black, centre, opened in Miami in 2017

    Business and consumer psychology experts say the boom in luxury branded apartments reflects a broader desire for social signalling and exclusivity.

    Giana Eckhardt, a professor of marketing at King’s College London, argues that such homes have become a new form of “social status currency”, akin to a rare handbag or huge diamond ring.

    “Ultra-wealthy consumers increasingly want status assets and goods that are not available to everyone,” she says.

    Eckhardt who specialises in consumer behaviour, branding and consumer culture, adds that luxury brands communicate a “person’s place in a social hierarchy”. “They want the social rewards that come with being associated with these brands,” she adds.

    BinGhatti agrees that exclusivity is central to the appeal. “Clients really get the highest level of exclusivity.

    “Every unit is unique and that gives them a special feeling of owning a one-of-a-kind [apartment] across the entire planet.”

    Yet business psychologist Stuart Duff, of UK firm Pearn Kandola, cautions that many people may find the idea of branded apartments to not be in good taste, especially if the brand name is excessively on show.

    “Having the presence of a brand everywhere within an apartment block could well reduce the perception of rarity and uniqueness, and lead to a feeling of bragging. And at worst being seen as vulgar and tacky.”

    Read more global business stories

    Continue Reading