Category: 3. Business

• EBRD extends up to €5 million to Landeslease under the SME Reboot Programme
• At least 70 per cent of sub‑leases dedicated to GET‑eligible green technologies
• Technical assistance and grant incentives funded by Switzerland through SBIF

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is strengthening its support for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in Albania through a new partnership with Landeslease. The Bank will provide a senior loan of up to €5 million to expand access to finance for MSMEs nationwide.

The funding, supplied under the EBRD’s SME Reboot Programme, will enable Landeslease to offer sub-leases for MSME investments in higher-performance technologies and services. It will help local firms go beyond business as usual and upgrade processes to meet European Union (EU) directives and other internationally recognised standards, boosting competitiveness at home and abroad.

To further reduce the cost of investment and ensure high-quality implementation, the programme provides technical cooperation, including support for implementation, marketing and monitoring. Eligible MSMEs will benefit from grant incentives of up to 10 per cent of each sub-lease, released after the investment has been verified. For this Landeslease loan, both the technical assistance and the investment grants are funded by Switzerland through the EBRD Small Business Impact Fund (SBIF).*

At least 70 per cent of the funds will finance green technologies eligible under the EBRD’s Green Economy Transition (GET) approach, supporting energy and resource efficiency and the adoption of cleaner solutions across Albania’s MSME sector.

Ekaterina Solovova, EBRD Head of Albania, said: “We are pleased to initiate a new partnership with Landeslease under our SME Reboot Programme. Through this collaboration, we are expanding access to affordable finance for Albanian MSMEs. With a strong focus on green investments, businesses can upgrade equipment, improve efficiency and align with EU standards, helping them grow sustainably and compete beyond the domestic market.”

Rezart Ferzaj, CEO of Landeslease said: “We greatly value this collaboration with the EBRD, which will enable Landeslease to combine leasing solutions, technical assistance and incentive programmes to help SMEs upgrade their business, improve efficiency and grow in alignment with EU standards.”

Founded in 2005 and headquartered in Tirana, Landeslease is one of Albania’s largest leasing companies. It specialises in finance and operating leases, with a strong focus on vehicles and equipment.

The EBRD’s SME Reboot Programme is designed to combine finance, advisory support and investment incentives to help small firms recover from recent macroeconomic challenges and raise performance standards.

To date, the EBRD has invested more than €2.3 billion through 175 projects in Albania.

*Other SBIF donors include: Italy, Ireland, Japan, South Korea, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, the TaiwanBusiness-EBRD Technical Cooperation Fund, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

June 21, 2023

Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt again ranked among nation’s best by U.S. News & World Report

Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt was again recognized as a national leader in pediatric health care, earning the distinction as the No. 1 children’s hospital in Tennessee and sharing first place in the Southeast region, according to the latest U.S. News & World Report Rankings.

By Christina Echegaray

Midlife is often described as a period of professional stability: experience earned, skills refined, and confidence established. Yet for many women in STEM, midlife can quietly become something else entirely — a convergence of career pressure, identity shifts, family responsibilities, and emotional exhaustion.

This phase is rarely discussed openly in engineering spaces. Instead of dramatic life changes, the struggle often unfolds silently through burnout, anxiety, loss of confidence, and, for some, unexpected communication challenges. I know this because I lived it.

The Invisible Pressure Many Women Engineers Carry

In midlife, many women engineers experience what researchers describe as role overload: the accumulation of competing responsibilities across work, family, and personal life. Career uncertainty, caregiving, leadership expectations, financial pressure, and (for immigrants) visa insecurity can coexist simultaneously.

In technical roles that value clarity, speed, and confidence, emotional strain is often hidden. We are trained to solve problems, not to pause and admit vulnerability. Over time, that silence can take a toll.

For me, the impact went beyond stress. Chronic pressure affected how I showed up professionally, especially how I communicated.

When Stress Affects Communication

At my lowest point, I noticed something unsettling. I struggled to speak confidently in meetings. I froze midsentence. I forgot simple words. My voice felt shaky, and my thoughts felt inaccessible.

This experience was frightening and isolating. In engineering environments, communication is tied closely to credibility. Losing ease of expression felt like losing part of my professional identity.

What I later learned is that prolonged stress and burnout can interfere with cognitive processing and emotional regulation — both critical for communication. This is the nervous system signaling overload. Many women experience this quietly, fearing it reflects weakness rather than exhaustion.

Rebuilding From the Inside Out

Recovery did not happen all at once. It came through intentional, steady rebuilding, both personally and professionally. What helped most:

• Meaningful technical work: Re-engaging with hands-on projects restored my confidence and sense of capability.
• Continuous learning: Structured learning provided clarity during uncertainty.
• Community: Connecting with peers reminded me that struggle does not equal failure.
• Boundaries and self-compassion: Letting go of perfectionism allowed space for healing.
• Movement and mindfulness: Gentle exercise and yoga helped regulate stress and rebuild focus.
• Support systems: Family, faith, and trusted mentors served as anchors during the transition.

Over time, my confidence returned — not because my challenges disappeared, but because my resilience grew.

Why This Matters for Women in STEM

Midlife transitions are not signs of decline; they are inflection points. When acknowledged and supported, they can become periods of renewal, leadership growth, and deeper alignment.

By normalizing conversations about burnout, mental well-being, and communication challenges, we can create engineering cultures that retain talented women rather than silently losing them.

If you are navigating uncertainty in midlife — professionally or personally — know this: you are not alone, and you are not failing. You are responding to complex pressures with the tools you have.

Growth does not always look like acceleration. Sometimes, it appears like recalibration. And that, too, is engineering.

The National Defense Authorization Act for the US federal government’s 2026 fiscal year was signed into law on December 18, 2025. While primarily an annual defense bill establishing the budget and expenditures of the US Department of Defense, this year’s bill also included the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act, which expands the scope of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to officers and directors of foreign private issuers.

Foreign private issuers (FPIs) are foreign companies that are publicly traded in the United States but have limited US ownership and business contacts in the country [1] and enjoy certain accommodations not applicable to publicly traded domestic companies. For example, FPIs have reduced US Securities and Exchange Commission reporting and disclosure obligations, may prepare their financial statements under internationally recognized or domestic accounting standards (as opposed to US generally accepted accounting principles), and are exempt from the US proxy rules, among other accommodations.

These privileges reflect the SEC’s longstanding approach of deferring to home country disclosure regimes, providing regulatory accommodations to non-US issuers, and maintaining the attractiveness of the US capital markets to non-US issuers.

Further, insiders of FPIs have historically been exempt from Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), which requires certain insiders of publicly traded companies to promptly disclose transactions and holdings involving such equity securities and derivatives thereof, disgorge to the company any profits realized on short-swing transactions, and refrain from engaging in short sales, pursuant to an explicit exemption provided to them in Rule 3a12-3(b) under the Exchange Act.

However, as discussed in a prior LawFlash, the SEC recently indicated a willingness to revisit its accommodating stance on FPIs, particularly in light of concerns regarding the increase of China-based issuers in the FPI population and whether there are unique investor protection concerns related to such issuers, and issued a concept release earlier this year requesting public comment on whether and how the definition of “foreign private issuer,” and thus the body of issuers able to rely on the exemptions available to FPIs, should be changed.

EXTENSION OF SECTION 16(A) TO FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS

The adoption of the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (HFIAA) subjects FPI officers and directors to Section 16(a)’s requirements for prompt reporting of those persons’ holdings, including certain indirect holdings, and transactions in the company’s equity securities and derivatives thereof. Specifically, FPI officers and directors generally will be required to publicly file with the SEC by 10:00 pm ET on the applicable due date:

1. initial ownership reports of all covered securities on Form 3:
   1. within 10 calendar days of becoming an insider under Section 16;
   2. in the case of an insider in a company that registers a class of equity securities with the SEC, on the date that such registration becomes effective;
   3. for officers and directors of FPIs with equity securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act on March 18, 2026, on that date;
2. insider transaction reports on Form 4 to disclose transactions in the company’s equity securities registered with the SEC under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and derivatives thereof on Form 4 within two business days; and
3. annual reports on Form 5 to disclose any transactions that were not otherwise reported on Forms 3 or 4 during the prior year within 45 days of the FPI’s fiscal year-end.

Section 16 extends to American depositary receipts (ADRs) representing the FPI’s equity securities as they are derivatives of those securities. Therefore, officers and directors of FPIs that list their ADRs, but not the underlying equity securities, in the United States on the NYSE or Nasdaq will be required to disclose their transactions and holdings in both the ADRs and the underlying equity securities.

Critically, the HFIAA does not extend to FPI insiders either Section 16(b), which is a strict liability provision that is actively policed by the plaintiff bar and requires insiders to disgorge all profits derived from short-swing transactions (i.e., nonexempt, opposite-way transactions that occur within six months), or the prohibition of short sales under Section 16(c). Further, unlike for domestic publicly traded companies, beneficial owners of greater than 10% of an FPI’s equity securities will not be required to comply with Section 16.

SCOPE AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUERS

Due to the self-executing nature of the HFIAA, officers and directors of FPIs may expect to be subject to Section 16(a) beginning on March 18, 2026, which is 90 days following the December 18 signing of the defense bill into law. The HFIAA provides that the SEC may grant exemptive relief to the extent the laws of a foreign jurisdiction apply “substantially similar requirements” to insiders.

However, the interaction between Section 16’s requirements and those of foreign disclosure regimes is a complex analysis as the applicable insider reporting thresholds, timing requirements, and permitted trading windows may differ materially from the US federal securities laws, and it remains to be seen whether or how the SEC will pursue this authorization.

While the responsibility to comply with Section 16 is primarily that of the insider and not the company, the majority of publicly traded companies assist their officers and directors by preparing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf. Although additional interpretive issues may arise as the compliance date nears, FPIs will need to assess which members of management will be deemed “officers” under Rule 16a-1(f), which is focused on the function and duties of such persons and not merely on titles.

For Nasdaq- and NYSE-listed FPIs, this analysis was likely already completed as part of their adoption of compensation clawback policies as recently mandated by the exchanges, but revisiting and refreshing such analysis in light of the new requirements would be prudent. All board members are deemed Section 16 insiders as directors, but a “director” can also include a person or entity that is deemed a “director by deputization” because one or more directors represents that person’s or entity’s interests on the board.

Further, public disclosure of individual equity compensation-related awards and transactions, such as equity grants, vesting and settlement of awards, the exercise of stock options or other awards, and the withholding of shares to pay taxes or the exercise price, will now be required because officers and directors will need to report individual grants and aggregate holdings on Forms 3 and 4.

This represents a significant departure from the current requirement that FPIs need only provide compensation information on an aggregate basis in annual reports on Form 20-F. Furthermore, officers and directors with trading arrangements that are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense against insider trading liability provided by Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act will be required to indicate transactions that are made pursuant to such plans by checking the applicable box on Form 4.

As noted above, the disgorgement of short-swing profits under Section 16(b) was not extended to officers and directors of FPIs at this time, which reduces the current risk of private litigation related to Section 16 filings; however, the failure to comply with Section 16(a) does invite SEC enforcement risk as well as public scrutiny. It is also likely that at some point the SEC will focus on FPI compliance with Section 16(a), however, there may be a grace period before such an enforcement “sweep” is performed.

Regardless, inadvertent reporting failures invite personal risk for such insiders and attendant reputational harm, and it is possible that the SEC may implement rulemaking to require FPIs to publicly disclose delinquent Section 16 filings by their insiders as domestic companies are currently required to do, underscoring the importance of early education and establishment of compliance infrastructure.

NEXT STEPS

Given the short runway, FPIs that are publicly traded in the United States should begin preparing for Section 16(a) compliance now. In addition to the substantive analysis and identification of the specific insiders subject to the reporting requirement noted above, these preparations include administrative tasks such as obtaining EDGAR Next filing codes from the SEC for officers and directors and necessary powers of attorney to allow the company to make the required filings on their behalf, as well as ensuring that filing agents have been delegated authority to make the requisite filings.

FPIs should also analyze the securities held by their insiders and the appropriate Section 16 reporting of those holdings, which can be complex, including as a result of idiosyncratic equity compensation arrangements, or other holdings of company securities by family members or through trusts, partnerships, or other entities and investment vehicles, or receivable as performance fees.

Further, FPIs should conduct an assessment of their controls and procedures as they relate to equity compensation grants, insider trading policies, and preclearance requests for transactions in securities and provide training on Section 16(a) to covered insiders and those tasked with compliance at the company. Given the complexity and short fuse for filing deadlines, proactive engagement with US legal counsel on Section 16(a) issues is particularly prudent for FPIs that are not familiar with the Section 16 reporting regime.