Category: 3. Business

Trump Mobile, the phone company launched by Donald Trump’s family business, has pushed back plans to deliver a $499 (£371) gold-coloured smartphone by the end of the year.

The Trump Organization licensed its name to launch a mobile service and the device in June, in the latest monetisation of his presidency by a family business empire now run by Trump’s sons.

In the latest setback for the project, Trump Mobile said there was a “strong possibility” the handset would not be delivered this month, the Financial Times reported. The company’s customer service team told the FT that the recent government shutdown had disrupted shipments.

The T1 smartphone, described by the company as “proudly American”, was initially promoted as a US-made rival to devices from Apple and Samsung. Almost all smartphones sold in the US are made overseas, primarily in China and South Korea but also increasingly in India and Vietnam.

Etched with an American flag, the T1 was initially promised in August and the website still states it will be released “later this year”. Customers are required to pay a $100 payment to pre-order the device.

The T1 launch came shortly after Trump criticised Apple over its plans to move the production of iPhones destined for the US market from China to India.

It remains unclear who could manufacture the T1 handset, given the low levels of domestic smartphone production in the US.

Trump Mobile also offers a phone contract costing $47.45 monthly, with the name of the service plan and the price referencing Trump’s status as the 47th US president.

The company has also recently started selling secondhand smartphones from Apple and Samsung on its website, which it states come “without the inflated price tag”.

However, a refurbished iPhone 15, which was launched in September 2023, costs $629 (£467) through Trump Mobile, whereas customers can buy a newer model, an iPhone 16 from 2024, directly from Apple for $699. A Samsung Galaxy S24 is being sold for $459, slightly lower than the $489 listed on Samsung’s US website.

The phone venture is headed by Trump’s sons Donald Jr and Eric, who took over the family company after their father transitioned to his second presidency.

The mobile service joins Trump-branded watches, footwear and Bibles as products capitalising on his political brand, while Trump’s sons have indicated there will be more to come.

The Trump Organization has expanded from real estate into digital media and telecommunications. The venture will operate through licensing deals that generated more than $8m for the president in 2024, according to financial disclosures.

The move into phones also raises questions about conflicts of interest, as the president’s family business operates in a sector that is heavily regulated by federal agencies over which Trump wields executive power.

Press Release:
09:57 CET • 31 Dec 2025

News release from Vestas-American Wind Technology
Portland, 31 December 2025

Vestas is proud to have received orders for 574 MW in the USA and Canada for undisclosed projects.

For more information, please contact:
Matt Copeman
Lead Specialist, Marketing & Communications
Mail: mtcoe@vestas.com
Tel: +1 (503) 475-6428

About Vestas
Vestas is the energy industry’s global partner on sustainable energy solutions. We design, manufacture, install, and service onshore and offshore wind turbines across the globe, and with more than 197 GW of wind turbines in 88 countries, we have installed more wind power than anyone else. Through our industry-leading smart data capabilities and unparalleled more than 159 GW of wind turbines under service, we use data to interpret, forecast, and exploit wind resources and deliver best-in-class wind power solutions. Together with our customers, Vestas’ more than 37,000 employees are bringing the world sustainable energy solutions to power a bright future.

For updated Vestas photographs and videos, please visit our media images page on: https://www.vestas.com/en/media/images.

We invite you to learn more about Vestas by visiting our website at www.vestas.com and following us on our social media channels:

With transit fares on the rise in a number of Canadian cities, some experts say it’s time to rethink how we fund public transportation.

Calgary hiked fares from $3.80 to $4 per ride earlier this month, and Ottawa just approved an increase of 10 cents, to $4.10. 

Earlier this year, Edmonton raised cash fares from $3.50 to $3.75 in February, while Victoria jumped from $2.50 to $3 in March and Vancouver went up from $3.20 to $3.35 in July.

The rising fares are a reflection of mounting pressures on transit systems.

Energy, maintenance and labour costs are up, while gas tax revenues that help fund public transit are declining, due in part to more electric and energy-efficient vehicles.

Meanwhile, transit organizations are still recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, when ridership and fare revenues plummeted. Emergency government funds have dried up and ridership hasn’t fully returned to pre-pandemic rates — in April, it had rebounded to 84.2 per cent of April 2019 numbers, according to Statistics Canada.

While this is a global problem, experts say Canada has additional challenges with urban sprawl and generally low population densities making it hard to keep routes in the black.

But while transit operators are feeling the pinch, Canadians are also struggling with rising costs of living, and the more fares go up, the more people can’t afford to get around their own cities. 

“The easiest thing to do is to raise your fares to increase your revenue, but what that does structurally to society is really bad,” said Lawrence Frank, urban studies and planning professor at the University of California, San Diego, and president of Urban Design 4 Health, a research and consulting firm that works with government agencies.

Frank says some transit operators in Canada don’t really have a choice under current funding models, because they have to fund a certain percentage of their operations through fares. Passenger fares cover an average of 59 per cent of public transit costs in Canada.

But he says hiking fares threatens to reduce ridership and “price people off the system,” which predominantly impacts people who are low income and have no other options.

Frank, who studied the links between transit use and health at the University of British Columbia, says it’s time to change the framework we use to assess the value of transit, so it factors in health and social benefits that come from greater equity, reduced sedentary behaviour and less air pollution.

His research has found that using transit instead of driving reduces likelihood of obesity and other health concerns. 

“We simply can’t have and create sustainable, healthy communities without transit,” he said.

“If we just isolate its economic value to what the fare box generates, you’ve completely eliminated the major economic benefits that come from a healthier workforce.” 

More funding could be tough sell

Advocacy organizations have been pushing for governments to reframe how they view public transit, arguing it’s an essential service and requires more stable funding.

A 2024 Leading Mobility Canada report found Canada’s major cities are struggling to keep their transit systems running, and “a downward spiral” in service is “inevitable” without major new streams of operating revenue.

But in practice, making that shift is not likely to be politically popular. 

“What I’ve long been arguing is we need a dedicated revenue source for public transportation systems,” said Jeff Casello, a professor with the University of Waterloo’s school of public planning.

Casello notes that public transit currently competes against other essential services for property tax dollars, which makes it hard to argue for increased spending through taxes.

Internationally, he says places like London, New York City and Singapore have implemented road tolls to raise funds for improving public transportation systems.

Citing successes from some of these programs, including a measurable decrease in pollution and congestion in New York, he suggests Canadian cities could similarly impose tolls for driving into downtown areas — though he acknowledges this would also be a tough sell.

“It’s politically unpopular, for sure,” he said.

To ensure transit users aren’t priced out of the system in the meantime, Casello says it’s important to focus on subsidizing costs for the lowest-income riders. This is something Canadian cities do in various ways, but he suggests something akin to the food stamp system in the U.S. He also cites a Philadelphia pilot program that gives key cards for free transit to people living near or below the poverty line.

Canada’s federal government used to offer a tax credit for public transit passes, but eliminated it in 2017, which Casello says was a “mistake.” 

Some cities cap fares, so people who spend a certain amount on single fares ride free after hitting a monthly limit. Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow recently floated a 47-rides-a-month cap in Canada’s biggest city — amounting to about $156, or the cost of a monthly pass. A global study from 2023 found Toronto’s monthly pass is the fourth most expensive among major cities as a percentage of average net wage, behind only Sao Paolo, Istanbul and London.

How about $0 fares?

In Durham, Ont., and starting Jan. 1 in Gatineau, Que., riders pay $4.75 cash to take the bus. Halifax has the cheapest single-fare price among Canada’s major cities at $3.

But some smaller municipalities have made public transit free entirely, deciding the extra municipal spending is a net benefit for residents.

Orangeville, Ont., saw ridership jump by 150 to 160 per cent in 2024 in the first year of eliminating fees, and the town’s mayor previously told CBC News the move had a positive impact on the whole community. Lisa Post said some residents in the town of 30,000 said free fares made “the difference of being able to get bread and milk.” 

Canmore, Alta., a mountain town of 17,000, has offered free transit since 2022.

But while this could be harder to scale up for a city the size of Toronto or Vancouver, American cities as big as Albuquerque, New Mexico (population roughly 560,000) offer free municipal public transit.

New York City’s mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani has pledged free bus service for the city of 8.5 million, saying he would fund it in part by raising taxes on the wealthiest corporations and individuals.

Sprawl strains the system

Thiago Carvalho, a PhD student in McGill University’s school of urban planning, says rising transit costs are a global issue — very few public transit systems actually turn a profit — but the urban sprawl and lower density of most Canadian cities makes it especially hard to keep costs down.

“The more sparse your transit system is, usually the more expensive it is … because you need to provide more service,” he said. 

In extremely dense Tokyo, Carvalho says developers have essentially constructed an entire “downtown” around most metro stations. Private companies often own the line and the land around their stations, so revenue from real estate, retail and other commercial properties helps sustain and expand the routes.

Carvalho says Canadian cities could do this on a smaller scale, and cities do typically factor in transit-oriented development when building out new rail routes, which can help keep transit costs down in the long term.

Ultimately, experts who spoke with CBC News say fares are likely to keep increasing and funding is likely to remain unstable without a shift in the way we view the role of public transit in Canadian society. 

“Transit’s not supposed to be for profit. It is an essential service. It has a very important social function of bringing people to work and bringing people to their desired destination,” Carvalho said. 

“We need to define the secure streams of funding that are going to allow this service to be sustainable and going to allow service to thrive. And the better the service, more people are going to be using transit.” 

It’s been a long time since many Canadians have felt the burn. That familiar aromatic, spicy and sometimes smoky flavour of a smooth, Kentucky bourbon has been but a memory for consumers in this country for much of the past year.

Ever since U.S. President Donald Trump launched his tariff war and began threatening to make Canada the “51st state,” angry consumers and lawmakers have united behind a “Buy Canadian” movement and bourbon was caught in the crossfire.

“People didn’t want to to lose their bourbon and neither did I,” said Ottawa-based whisky expert Davin de Kergommeaux. But he, like so many other consumers, supports the boycotts of American products in favour of Canadian alternatives.

Canada had been a key market for the bourbon industry and major brands like Jim Beam and Maker’s Mark for quite some time. But despite his desire to see bourbon back on shelves and behind the bar, de Kergommeaux — who literally wrote the book of Canadian Whisky — believes the liquor landscape here may have changed for good.

Souring on American whiskey

Bourbon really began to boom in Canada a little over a decade ago, de Kergommeaux says, thanks to aggressive marketing campaigns and consumers looking for something a little different from what they were used to.

“It doesn’t taste like traditional Canadian whisky at all,” de Kergomeaux said. “It’s a big, bold whisky, and quite bright, quite sweet.”

Craig Peters, founder and CEO of Maverick Distillery in Oakville, Ont., says what makes bourbon unique is that it’s distilled and aged in new oak barrels that are only used once, which is what gives the liquor its darker colour and rich caramel and vanilla flavours.

In addition to the oak barrels, for bourbon to be called that, it has to be made using at least 51 per cent corn mash and, most importantly, experts say, it has to be produced in the U.S.

But Peters says it still “holds its own special place with consumers” in Canada, either sipped neat or on the rocks, or mixed into cocktails like Manhattans, paper planes and the classic old fashioned.

But as a result of the cross-border animosity, exports of bourbon to Canada from January to September dropped about 60 per cent compared with a year earlier, going from 41.3 million to 16.4 million units according to the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States.

Bourbon producers have been pleading with provinces to resume stocking U.S. booze — Saskatchewan and Alberta have done so, while Nova Scotia and Manitoba are selling off existing stock — and with the Trump administration to ease trade tensions. However, that’s not the only challenge the industry is facing.

Whisky sales globally were already slumping and Peters says there’s been a glut of bourbon as a result of overproduction in the past few years.

But he says all of this has created the perfect opportunity for distilleries like his to stir things up in the Canadian whisky world.

Bourbon by any other name

Maverick Distillery had already been importing barrels of bourbon from the U.S. to produce a line of its own blended whisky, but Peters says the company is now also bottling “straight up 100 per cent bourbon.”

“Although we can’t call this baby bourbon,” he said, holding up a bottle, which is labelled Kentucky whisky, “it is actually a five-year Kentucky bourbon bottled here in Canada.”

The federal Spirit Drinks Trade Act of 2006 restricts the use of names of alcohol produced in specific geographic areas in foreign countries.

Aside from bourbon, other examples of such spirits include scotch (Scotland), cognac (France) and tequila (Mexico).

Peters says consumer demand for bourbon was high enough that he didn’t feel it was contrary to the “Buy Canadian” sentiment to have staff at his Ontario distillery bottle what is truly an American product.

De Kergommeaux says what Maverick is doing is “kind of out of step” with efforts to prioritize Canadian products over U.S. imports.

“This is not anti-American, this is buy Canadian,” he said.

But that doesn’t mean he’s not looking forward to cracking open his own bottle of Maverick’s Kentucky whisky at some point soon.

De Kergommeaux says he’s not aware of any producer in Canada that is bottling actual bourbon other than Maverick, and he’s not expecting many others to start.

That Canadian spirit

Although he notes some other distillers across the country have begun blending bourbon-style whisky variations, with names like BRBN and Berbon, to cater to those still craving that taste of Kentucky, where the majority of U.S. bourbon is produced.

While he says these kinds of subsititutes don’t taste quite the same, he suggests many are quality whiskies that can be used in a Manhattan or sipped straight up with a couple drops of water, as he does.

And it’s not just U.S. tariffs contributing to what industry watchers say is a global downturn in whisky and liquor sales overall — in general, more people are eschewing alcohol, while sales of cannabis beverages are also rising.

Which is why de Kergommeaux is excited to see a Canadian product back in the spotlight and thriving.

He says that rather than worrying about a downturn, Canadian producers big and small are having trouble keeping up with demand.

“I think that people have been trying to find bourbon and trying to find Canadian whisky that tastes like bourbon,” he said, “and in the process, they have been tasting a lot of Canadian whiskies and wishing they had given them a chance sooner.”