Bank of America’s top investment strategist Michael Hartnett is urging investors to flip the script, backing Main Street over global elites as cooling inflation, AI disruption and political pressure reshape markets ahead of U.S. midterms.
The expert laid out a bold call in his latest Flow Show report: Investors should “stay long Detroit, short Davos” — favoring U.S. small and mid‑caps, banks, REITs, emerging markets, and international equities over the so‑called Magnificent 7 and other Big Tech giants.
Hartnett’s core message is that markets are beginning to price a political and economic pivot toward affordability.
That shift matters.
Don’t Miss:
Assets punished during the big bond bear market of the early 2020s are quietly outperforming the elite “Davos” trades that dominated portfolios for years.
Since the Trump inauguration in January 2025, the so-called “Bro Billionaire” basket – an equally weighted mix of Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META), Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR), Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), ARK Innovation ETF (NYSE:ARKK), Apollo Global Management Inc. (NYSE:APO), Blackstone Inc. (NYSE:BX), Oracle Corp. (NYSE:ORCL), Coinbase Global Inc. (NASDAQ:COIN), and Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) are up roughly 6%, while U.S. small caps – tracked by the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE:IWM) – are up closer to 13%.
That divergence may look modest, but historically it’s how regime changes begin: slowly, then suddenly.
The expert indicates that a series of macroeconomic and political shifts are underpinning this rotation. With inflation surprises tilting to the downside and artificial intelligence (AI) adoption cooling the labor market, affordability pressures — on energy, healthcare, credit, housing, and electricity — have moved to the political foreground.
Hartnett said the team stays long Main Street and short Wall Street until Trump’s approval rating rises on affordability-focused policy.
Trending: This Real Estate Fund Pays 10x More Than the Average Savings Account – Invest From Just $100
A key risk sits with the former market leaders as Hartnett warns of a flip from asset-light to asset-heavy business models.
AI hyperscalers are expected to spend $670 billion on capex in 2026, consuming 96% of their cash flow, compared with roughly $150 billion or 40% of their cash in 2023.
That changes everything.
The leaders of the 2020s — the Magnificent Seven — are no longer the cleanest balance sheets in the market.
They’re no longer the biggest buyback engines.
According to Hartnett, Wall Street isn’t abandoning AI — it’s rotating from AI spenders to AI beneficiaries, from services to manufacturing, from hype to cash flow.
See Also: Americans With a Financial Plan Can 4X Their Wealth — Get Your Personalized Plan from a CFP Pro
Hartnett sees a historical pattern where major global events trigger long-term shifts in market leadership.
From gold after Bretton Woods to bonds in the Volcker era, U.S. stocks during globalization, commodities after China’s WTO entry, and megacap tech after COVID, leadership has consistently rotated following big events.
He sees 2025 as the next inflection point, marking a shift away from U.S. exceptionalism toward global rebalancing.
In this new cycle, Hartnett expects U.S. small and mid-cap stocks, financials, regional banks, REITs, and real assets to outperform, alongside international equities, China’s consumer sector, and emerging market commodity producers.
Conversely, he warns that high-valuation, asset-light Big Tech leaders face rising risk as capital rotates toward more traditional, income-generating parts of the economy.
Read Next: Designed for investors with strong market convictions, REX Shares builds ETFs for income, leverage, and tactical positioning — explore the lineup.
Photo: Shutterstock
UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga:
This article ‘Stay Long Detroit, Short Davos’: Why BofA’s Hartnett Sees A Main Street Boom Ahead Of The Midterms originally appeared on Benzinga.com
(Bloomberg) — Investors and policymakers are gearing up for a busy week of US economic reports that includes arguably the two most consequential data snapshots — employment and inflation.
The January jobs report on Wednesday and the consumer price index, due Friday, are unusually close together on the calendar after the partial government shutdown delayed each by a few days. Normally, the jobs report lands on a Friday and CPI comes the following week.
The employment report will be even more substantive than usual. In addition to the monthly payrolls and unemployment numbers, each January release includes an annual revision to the jobs count. The so-called benchmark update is expected to reveal a notable markdown to payrolls growth in the year through March 2025.
As for the regular monthly figures, economists predict payrolls rose 69,000 in January. Such an outcome would be the best in four months and offer some reassurance against further softening in the labor market. The unemployment rate is seen holding at 4.4%, near a four-year high.
In the CPI data, economists will look for more evidence that inflation is on a downward trend after previous reports were complicated by last year’s record-long government shutdown. Forecasters expect an underlying metric of inflation — which excludes food and energy costs — to rise at the slowest annual pace since early 2021.
The Federal Reserve chose to hold interest rates steady in January given signs of stabilization in the labor market and inflation that’s still elevated. Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Stephen Miran, who both dissented in favor of another rate cut, will speak in the coming week.
What Bloomberg Economics Says:
“For payrolls, we estimate the BLS benchmark revision will lower the level for March 2025 by about 650K jobs — somewhat less pessimistic than the consensus. January’s jobs print may surprise on the low side, as the BLS’s modifies its ‘birth and death’ model to account for recent hiring weakness.”
—Anna Wong, Stuart Paul, Eliza Winger, Chris G. Collins, Alex Tanzi and Troy Durie, economists. For full analysis, click here
Government figures on Tuesday are projected to show another month of solid retail sales in December. Despite elevated anxiety about the high cost of living and the shaky job market, household spending has been resilient — a trend that many economists expect to endure in the near term as annual tax refunds roll out.
While household spending growth has been solid, the housing market remains bogged down by affordability constraints. National Association of Realtors data due on Thursday will probably show sales of previously owned homes declined in January.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for the US Looking north, the Bank of Canada’s summary of deliberations will offer insight into its decision to hold rates steady for a second consecutive meeting, while warning that heightened uncertainty made its next move hard to predict. Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers will speak on Thursday about how artificial intelligence is impacting the economy.
Elsewhere, Japan’s election, inflation data from China to Switzerland to Brazil, gross domestic product in the UK, and rate decisions from Russia to Peru may focus investors.
Click here for what happened in the past week, and below is our wrap of what’s coming up in the global economy.
Asia
China sets the tone early with January credit data, including new yuan loans, aggregate financing, and money supply figures.
Investors want to see whether easier policy is translating into stronger economic momentum. Inflation readings later in the week, including producer and consumer prices due Wednesday, should help clarify whether deflationary pressures are easing or becoming more entrenched.
Fresh off a national election, Japan gets a big batch of data on Monday, with cash earnings and real wage data for December expected to shed light on whether income growth is fueling prices. Balance-of-payments figures are released the same day, while machinery orders later in the week will offer an update on capital spending momentum.
In Australia, attention turns to domestic demand indicators arriving Tuesday, including household spending for December and consumer confidence readings. The figures land a week after the Reserve Bank’s hawkish pivot.
South Korea has January unemployment data on Wednesday.
In Southeast Asia, the spotlight turns to growth. Malaysia releases fourth-quarter GDP on Friday, alongside current-account figures, offering insight into domestic demand.
India publishes January inflation on Thursday, a key test for the Reserve Bank of India as it weighs the scope for easing later this year. Food prices remain a swing factor, and any upside surprise could complicate the policy outlook.
In sum, the week’s data will help determine whether Asia’s cooling inflation narrative is intact — or whether, as Australia’s experience shows, central banks risk being pushed into a more stop-start policy path as growth and prices diverge across the region.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for Asia Europe, Middle East, Africa
Following the Bank of England’s close vote against a rate cut — and Governor Andrew Bailey’s apparent endorsement of bets on a 50% chance of a March move — data in the coming week will reveal the strength of the economy in the fourth quarter. Most analysts predict only a slight acceleration to growth of 0.2% from the prior three months.
Officials scheduled to speak include key voters including Bailey himself on Sunday and Catherine Mann on Monday. Chief economist Huw Pill is on the diary for Friday.
In the euro zone, following the European Central Bank’s decision to keep borrowing costs unchanged, an appearance on Monday in the European Parliament by President Christine Lagarde is among several by policymakers in the coming days. Data on trade and a second reading of GDP are due on Friday.
On Thursday, European Union leaders will gather for a meeting focused on improving the bloc’s single market — for which the ECB has provided a checklist of desired measures.
Switzerland’s inflation number on Friday may draw attention, with a result of just 0.1% — at the lower end of the Swiss National Bank’s target range — predicted by economists. Some even forecast a return to zero price growth, while the central bank chief, Martin Schlegel, has acknowledged that more negative readings are possible this year.
Both Norway and Denmark will release inflation numbers on Tuesday following Norway’s GDP reading the previous day.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for EMEA The diary features a number of central bank decisions around Africa:
Uganda on Monday and Mauritius on Wednesday are expected to leave their rates steady at 9.75% and 4.5% respectively, as policymakers assess the inflation trajectory. Kenya on Tuesday and Zambia on Wednesday are likely to reduce borrowing costs. Kenya’s central bank is seen cutting its rate by 25 basis points to 8.75%, with inflation likely to stay within its target band in the near term. Zambia is expected to deliver a 50 basis-point cut, to 13.75%, anticipating price growth to slow. Eastern Europe will also see some decisions:
On Thursday, the National Bank of Serbia may extend its long streak of unchanged rates amid slowing inflation and early signs of a pickup in growth. The Bank of Russia will likely choose between a third consecutive modest 50 basis-point cut or a hold at 16% at its first meeting of the year on Friday, as policymakers wonder if the inflation effects of a hike in value-added tax could persist. Consumer-price data later that day may show an acceleration. Latin America
Mexico-watchers on Monday get both mid- and full-month consumer price reports as a follow-up to the central bank’s decision to pause at 7%.
Inflation picked up in early January, which to some analysts may push Banxico to the sidelines until the second quarter, when pressures related to newly enacted tariffs and excise tax hikes, along with a minimum wage increase, subside. Analysts in Citi’s latest Mexico Expectations Survey see annual prints creeping higher in January and February.
Brazil will also post its January inflation report, which is likely to show some uptick after ending 2025 within the central bank’s target range. Consumer price increases overshot the top of the target range in three of the previous four years.
Banco Central do Brasil stands poised to finally begin whittling away at its 15% key rate next month, but how fast and how far remain open questions.
Argentina’s inflation ended 2025 moving in the wrong direction, with the annual reading posting slight increases in November and December while the monthly rate rose for four straight months.
Economy Minister Luis Caputo sees January’s monthly result likely coming in near December’s 2.8%, which implies a year-on-year figure of 32.2%.
Analysts in the central bank’s most recent survey marked up their 2026 inflation forecast to 22.4% from 20.1% previously.
Peru’s central bank board meets Thursday, with the country’s economy in no need of stimulus and inflation running below the 2% midpoint of its 1% to 3% target range. A fifth straight hold at 4.25% looks nearly certain there.
For more, read Bloomberg Economics’ full Week Ahead for Latin America –With assistance from Swati Pandey, Monique Vanek, Robert Jameson, Mark Evans, Laura Dhillon Kane, Tony Halpin and Kira Zavyalova.
Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St’s investing ideas for FREE.
If you are wondering whether Shopify’s current share price lines up with its underlying business, you are not alone. That is exactly what this article will unpack for you.
Shopify’s stock recently closed at US$112.05, with returns of a 14.6% decline over the last 7 days, a 32.8% decline over the last 30 days, a 28.7% decline year to date, a 4.6% decline over 1 year, and a 132.0% gain over 3 years, alongside a 23.0% decline over 5 years.
Recent news coverage has focused on Shopify’s role as a major e commerce platform provider and how investor expectations around growth, profitability and competition can influence short term price swings. Commentary has also highlighted how sentiment toward high growth software names can change quickly. This provides useful context for the recent share price moves.
Our valuation checks currently give Shopify a score of 2 out of 6. Next we will look at how different valuation methods assess the stock, while hinting at a more rounded way to think about value that we will come back to at the end.
Shopify scores just 2/6 on our valuation checks. See what other red flags we found in the full valuation breakdown.
A Discounted Cash Flow model projects the cash a business could generate in the future and then discounts those cash flows back to today to estimate what the whole company might be worth right now.
For Shopify, the model uses a 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity approach. The latest twelve months Free Cash Flow is about $1.89b. Analyst projections, supplemented by Simply Wall St extrapolations beyond the usual 5 year window, indicate Free Cash Flow of $7.52b by 2030, with intermediate years stepping up between those points based on the inputs shown in the table above.
Discounting all those projected cash flows back to today gives an estimated intrinsic value of US$127.03 per share. Compared with the recent share price of about US$112.05, this suggests the stock is around 11.8% undervalued according to this DCF model.
Result: UNDERVALUED
Our Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis suggests Shopify is undervalued by 11.8%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 53 more high quality undervalued stocks.
SHOP Discounted Cash Flow as at Feb 2026
Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Shopify.
For profitable companies, the P/E ratio is a useful way to think about value because it links what you pay per share to the earnings the business is already generating. It is a quick gauge of how many dollars investors are willing to pay for each dollar of current earnings.
What counts as a “normal” P/E depends on how the market views a company’s growth potential and risk. Higher expected growth and lower perceived risk can justify a higher multiple, while slower growth or higher uncertainty usually point to a lower one.
Shopify currently trades on a P/E of 81.90x. That is above the IT industry average of 26.51x and also above the peer average of 36.66x. Simply Wall St’s Fair Ratio for Shopify is 46.69x. This Fair Ratio is a proprietary estimate of what the P/E might be, given factors like earnings growth, profit margins, industry, market cap and specific risks.
Because it blends these company specific drivers, the Fair Ratio can be more informative than a simple comparison with peers or the broad industry. Comparing the two, Shopify’s current P/E of 81.90x versus the Fair Ratio of 46.69x indicates the shares are trading above that modelled level.
Result: OVERVALUED
NasdaqGS:SHOP P/E Ratio as at Feb 2026
P/E ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Start investing in legacies, not executives. Discover our 22 top founder-led companies.
Earlier we mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation. Let us introduce you to Narratives, which let you attach a clear story to your numbers by pairing your view on Shopify’s future revenue, earnings and margins with an assumed fair value.
A Narrative is simply your structured view of the company. You connect what you think Shopify’s business story looks like over time to a financial forecast, and then to a fair value that you can compare with the current share price.
On Simply Wall St, millions of investors share these Narratives on the Community page. This makes it easy for you to see different scenarios, use the tools without complex modelling, and see whether your own Fair Value sits above or below the current price, which can help you decide if and when you might want to act.
Because Narratives refresh automatically when new information such as earnings reports or major news is added to the platform, one investor might build a Shopify Narrative that assumes strong revenue growth and a higher fair value, while another assumes slower growth and a lower fair value. Both can instantly see how their stories stack up against the live market price.
Do you think there’s more to the story for Shopify? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
NasdaqGS:SHOP 1-Year Stock Price Chart
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include SHOP.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Make better investment decisions with Simply Wall St’s easy, visual tools that give you a competitive edge.
Veolia Environnement (ENXTPA:VIE) is back in the spotlight after a US labor complaint involving Teamsters Local 63, which highlighted potential risks around operating costs, reputation, and public contracts ahead of the next earnings update.
See our latest analysis for Veolia Environnement.
At a share price of €32.02, Veolia Environnement has posted a 30 day share price return of 5.29% and a 90 day share price return of 11.03%. Its 1 year total shareholder return of 20.56% and 5 year total shareholder return of 80.05% indicate momentum that has held up through both recent US workforce initiatives and the ongoing Teamsters complaint.
If labour issues and infrastructure demand are on your radar, it could be worth seeing what else is moving in essential services and utilities through our 24 power grid technology and infrastructure stocks.
With Veolia trading at €32.02 and indicators like a value score of 3 and an intrinsic discount estimate, the key question is whether current momentum leaves any upside on the table or if markets are already pricing in future growth.
With Veolia Environnement at €32.02 against a narrative fair value of €35.71, the current price sits below what this widely followed storyline implies.
Strong multi-year growth in Water Technologies and Hazardous Waste segments is being driven by rising health, resilience, and environmental compliance requirements worldwide, as reflected in Veolia’s record order book and robust +8.9% growth in booster activities. This is likely to support sustained revenue and EBITDA growth, underpinned by tightening global regulations on pollution and water safety.
Read the complete narrative.
Want to see what is behind that fair value gap? The narrative leans on steady revenue expansion, thicker profit margins, and a higher earnings multiple than many peers. The full story connects those moving parts into one valuation roadmap.
Result: Fair Value of €35.71 (UNDERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.
However, earnings pressure from flat tariffs in France and weaker France Municipal Waste revenue could quickly challenge the idea that Veolia’s current valuation gap will persist.
Find out about the key risks to this Veolia Environnement narrative.
If you set the story about future cash flows aside and just look at earnings, Veolia trades on a P/E of 19.4x, roughly in line with its 19.4x fair ratio and slightly below the 20.4x peer average, while sitting a touch above the 19.3x global industry level. That kind of tight clustering hints that much of the good news may already be in the price, so the key question is what would need to change for the market to shift that ratio meaningfully in either direction.
See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.
ENXTPA:VIE P/E Ratio as at Feb 2026
If you read this and feel the story should look different, you can put the data to work yourself and build a custom view in a few minutes: Do it your way.
A great starting point for your Veolia Environnement research is our analysis highlighting 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision.
If Veolia has your attention, do not stop here. Casting a wider net with focused screeners can surface opportunities you might regret missing later.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include VIE.PA.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St.
Archer-Daniels-Midland is back in focus after analysts recently nudged their implied fair value view from about US$57.09 to about US$59.64, while also slightly adjusting the discount rate and revenue growth assumptions that sit behind those targets. The updates reflect a balance between concerns about oversupply in key commodity markets and interest in possible macro and policy catalysts that could support future demand. As these inputs keep getting fine tuned, it is worth staying plugged in so you can track how the story evolves and what it might mean for your own view on ADM.
Analyst Price Targets don’t always capture the full story. Head over to our Company Report to find new ways to value Archer-Daniels-Midland.
🐂 Bullish Takeaways
Several firms have recently lifted their implied fair value for Archer-Daniels-Midland, including BMO Capital, JPMorgan and BofA. Collectively they nudged targets into the high US$50s range, suggesting analysts see room for the story to develop as execution and cost discipline remain in focus.
BofA points to potential macro and policy catalysts such as improving PMI indicators, possible rate cuts and capacity rationalization in China as areas that could help sentiment for commodities and agriculture related names, even if these are still early stage.
Across the recent notes, analysts appear to be rewarding ADM for staying positioned in a mixed commodity and agriculture setup, where consistent operations and risk management could matter more than chasing aggressive growth.
🐻 Bearish Takeaways
BofA, which keeps an Underperform rating even as it raises its ADM price target to US$57 from US$54, highlights that commodities face another year of growing oversupply and that agriculture looks more mixed. This can weigh on sentiment toward ADM’s earnings power and valuation.
The same BofA note cautions that potential positive catalysts such as better PMI data, interest rate cuts and capacity rationalization in China are too new to rely on. This reinforces a view that near term upside may be limited while oversupply and an inconsistent backdrop for specialties remain key risks for ADM.
Do your thoughts align with the Bull or Bear Analysts? Perhaps you think there’s more to the story. Head to the Simply Wall St Community to discover more perspectives or begin writing your own Narrative!
NYSE:ADM 1-Year Stock Price Chart
ADM’s Board declared a cash dividend of US$0.52 per share on common stock, compared with the prior US$0.51 per share. The company highlighted that this is its 377th consecutive quarterly payment, with 53 years of consecutive dividend growth and more than 94 years of uninterrupted dividends.
ADM and Alltech launched Akralos Animal Nutrition, a North American animal feed and nutrition company that combines Hubbard Feeds and Masterfeeds with ADM’s U.S. feed operations. The new business operates more than 40 feed mills and is supported by over 1,400 team members across the region.
ADM reported a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission related to prior reporting of intersegment sales and agreed to pay US$40 million. The company stated that the affected transactions did not change previously reported consolidated balance sheet, earnings or cash flows, and noted that the U.S. Department of Justice closed its investigation with no further action.
ADM began operations at a carbon capture and storage project at its Columbus, Nebraska corn processing complex, using Tallgrass’s Trailblazer pipeline to transport captured CO2 to an underground sequestration hub. The pipeline is capable of moving more than 10 million tons of CO2 per year.
Fair Value: Implied fair value moved from about US$57.09 to about US$59.64, which is a modest upward adjustment in what analysts see as justified pricing for Archer-Daniels-Midland.
Discount Rate: The discount rate used in models edged up slightly from 6.96% to 6.98%, signaling a very small change in the assumed risk or required return that analysts are building into their cash flow work.
Revenue Growth: Revenue growth assumptions shifted from about 0.59% to about 1.16%, so the latest models are incorporating a higher expected top line growth rate than before.
Net Profit Margin: Net profit margin assumptions moved from about 2.54% to about 2.31%, which points to a slightly more cautious view on how much profit Archer-Daniels-Midland could keep from each dollar of sales.
Future P/E: The future P/E multiple increased from about 15.7x to about 18.9x, meaning analysts are now applying a higher valuation multiple to the earnings they expect Archer-Daniels-Midland to generate.
Narratives on Simply Wall St let you attach a clear story to the numbers, so you can see how your view on Archer-Daniels-Midland’s future revenue, earnings and margins links to a fair value estimate. Each Narrative connects the company’s business drivers to a forecast and fair value, and then compares that to the current share price, updating automatically when new news or earnings arrive. You can find and build Narratives on the Simply Wall St Community page, used by millions of investors looking for a more structured way to decide when to buy or sell.
If you want the full story behind the latest ADM fair value update, it is worth reading the original Narrative on Archer-Daniels-Midland and keeping it on your radar.
How government support and policy settings for biofuels, including tax credits and volume obligations, feed into ADM’s expected margins and cash flows.
Why facility upgrades like the Decatur East ramp up, cost savings of US$500m to US$750m, and Nutrition growth assumptions feed through to higher projected earnings.
What could challenge this view, from margin pressure in core Ag Services & Oilseeds to compliance and reputational risks, and what that means for ADM’s implied fair value of about US$59.64.
Follow the full Archer-Daniels-Midland Narrative on the Simply Wall St Community here: ADM: Mixed Commodity Backdrop And Policy Shifts Will Shape Fairly Valued Shares. To keep using stories like this to interpret new data points and analyst moves on ADM, Curious how numbers become stories that shape markets? Explore Community Narratives
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include ADM.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
Track your investments for FREE with Simply Wall St, the portfolio command center trusted by over 7 million individual investors worldwide.
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals (ARWR) is back on many watchlists after a sharp total return over the past 3 months and the past year. This has prompted fresh questions about how its RNAi pipeline and current valuation line up.
See our latest analysis for Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals.
With the share price at US$64.52, Arrowhead has given investors a 64.47% 90 day share price return and a 218.77% 1 year total shareholder return. This suggests that momentum has recently built despite softer shorter term moves.
If Arrowhead’s run has you thinking about what else is moving in health related RNA and data driven therapies, it could be worth scanning 26 healthcare AI stocks as a fresh set of ideas.
After a move like that, the key question is simple: is Arrowhead still trading below what its pipeline and cash flows might justify, or has the recent run already pushed the stock to fully reflect future growth?
At a last close of $64.52 versus a narrative fair value of $64.08, Arrowhead is framed as slightly ahead of that fair value estimate, with the story hinging on how its RNAi pipeline translates into future earnings.
Arrowhead’s advancing late-stage clinical pipeline, especially the expected launch of plozasiran for FCS and SHTG, plus pivotal studies for three other RNAi therapies targeting major unmet needs, positions the company to capitalize on rising demand for innovative treatments driven by an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic and genetic diseases, which could significantly accelerate revenue growth as approvals and launches materialize.
Read the complete narrative.
Want to see what kind of revenue curve and profit margins sit behind that small gap between price and fair value? The narrative leans on ambitious earnings, a steep rerating in valuation multiples, and a tight discount rate working together in ways the share price does not fully echo. Curious how those moving parts add up in the model and what would need to happen in the real world for them to line up?
Result: Fair Value of $64.08 (OVERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.
However, there is still clear risk that delayed or disappointing Phase 3 outcomes, or weaker than expected partner milestones, could quickly challenge this optimistic setup.
Find out about the key risks to this Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals narrative.
While the narrative fair value of $64.08 paints Arrowhead as roughly in line with today’s $64.52 share price, our DCF model points the other way. On that cash flow view, Arrowhead is trading about 55% below an estimated value of $144.20, which is a wide gap for investors to think through.
Look into how the SWS DCF model arrives at its fair value.
ARWR Discounted Cash Flow as at Feb 2026
Simply Wall St performs a discounted cash flow (DCF) on every stock in the world every day (check out Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals for example). We show the entire calculation in full. You can track the result in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted when this changes, or use our stock screener to discover 53 high quality undervalued stocks. If you save a screener we even alert you when new companies match – so you never miss a potential opportunity.
If you see the numbers differently or prefer to stress test your own set of assumptions, you can build a complete Arrowhead narrative yourself in just a few minutes: Do it your way.
A great starting point for your Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals research is our analysis highlighting 3 key rewards and 2 important warning signs that could impact your investment decision.
If Arrowhead has sharpened your curiosity, do not stop here. The real edge often comes from comparing a few different high quality ideas side by side.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include ARWR.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
The Seahawks and the Patriots aren’t the only ones gearing up for a fight.
AI rivals Anthropic and OpenAI have launched a war of ads trying to court corporate America during one of the biggest entertainment nights of the year.
Ahead of the Super Bowl, Anthropic has launched a series of ads going hard at its rival.
For the scrawny 23-year-old who wants a six-pack, a ripped older man who is supposed to depict a chatbot suggests insoles that “help short kings stand tall” because “confidence isn’t just built in the gym”. And for the man trying to improve communication with his mom: his therapist prescribes “a mature dating site that connects sensitive cubs with roaring cougars” in case he can’t fix that relationship.
All four ads end with the same tagline: “Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude.” There’s no explicit mention of ChatGPT, but the subtext is clear.
Even Sam Altman laughed. But he also called the ads “so clearly dishonest” before diving into a lengthy critique on X.
“Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them,” Altman wrote. “We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.”
Altman stressed that OpenAI’s decision to include ads, announced last month, makes the product more accessible. “We believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access,” he wrote. And Altman didn’t shy away from taking some shots of his own. “Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions,” he wrote. (Claude has a free subscription version, too.)
ChatGPT’s ad policy is not live yet, but OpenAI maintains on its website that ads will be “separate and clearly labeled” and won’t influence the answers users see. The company also states that it will not share conversations with ChatGPT with advertisers, and is focused on prioritising trust, claiming it will give users the option to turn off personalization or opt for an ad-free paid plan. The company said the chatbot would initially have ads show up at the bottom of answers “when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation”.
Altman wasn’t always sold on including ads in ChatGPT’s business model. In October 2024, he dismissed the idea as a “last resort”. But in recent years, as OpenAI invests even more heavily in AI infrastructure, the company’s growth in new subscribers has dwindled.
Anthropic’s critique of OpenAI didn’t come out of nowhere: Anthropic was founded by former OpenAI researchers who left based on concerns about the company’s direction on AI safety. Anthropic wrote in a 4 February blogpost that Claude would remain ad-free because doing otherwise would prevent the chatbot from being a “genuinely helpful assistant for work and for deep thinking”. The company likened open-ended conversations with AI assistants, which are often deeply personal or complex, to those with a trusted adviser. “The appearance of ads in these contexts would feel incongruous – and, in many cases, inappropriate,” the company wrote.
Even if OpenAI says it won’t share user data directly with advertisers, targeted advertising more broadly has been criticized for exploiting users’ vulnerabilities. In this case, that concern could extend to users asking ChatGPT questions about their mental and physical health, similar to the issues shown in Anthropic’s ads. But there’s also a chance targeted advertising could help with reining in AI’s most toxic attributes. Big corporations that buy in may pull out in response to hateful or egregious content. Many websites and apps, from Google to Instagram, already have ads, so it may not be a huge adjustment for users.
It is unclear whether Altman’s attempts to deliver more revenue with ads will drive users to ad-free competitors. But Anthropic is betting on it.
Never miss an important update on your stock portfolio and cut through the noise. Over 7 million investors trust Simply Wall St to stay informed where it matters for FREE.
If you are wondering whether Jefferies Financial Group is offering good value right now, it helps to step back and look at both its recent share performance and what the numbers say about the price you are paying.
The stock last closed at US$58.94, with returns of a 3.7% decline over the past week, an 8.9% decline over the past month, a 7.1% decline year to date, and gains of 64.5% over three years and 146.2% over five years.
Recent coverage around Jefferies Financial Group has focused on its role as a diversified financial services provider and how investors are reacting to shifts in sentiment toward the sector. Together with the share price moves, this news flow has put more attention on whether the current price fairly reflects the company’s fundamentals.
Right now, Jefferies Financial Group has a valuation score of 2 out of 6, reflecting how often it screens as undervalued on a set of standard checks. Next we will break down those valuation methods and then finish with a more complete way to think about what the stock could be worth.
Jefferies Financial Group scores just 2/6 on our valuation checks. See what other red flags we found in the full valuation breakdown.
The Excess Returns model looks at how much profit a company is expected to generate over and above the return that equity investors require, then ties that back to the value of its equity per share.
For Jefferies Financial Group, the model starts with a Book Value of US$51.26 per share and a Stable EPS of US$4.98 per share, based on weighted future Return on Equity estimates from 4 analysts. The Average Return on Equity is 8.69%, while the Cost of Equity is put at US$5.33 per share. This implies an Excess Return of US$0.35 per share in the model.
The Stable Book Value is US$57.31 per share, based on estimates from 3 analysts. Combining these inputs, the Excess Returns framework produces an estimated intrinsic value of about US$51.40 per share.
Against the recent share price of US$58.94, this implies the stock is about 14.7% overvalued on this measure. The Excess Returns model is therefore signaling a valuation premium rather than a discount.
Result: OVERVALUED
Our Excess Returns analysis suggests Jefferies Financial Group may be overvalued by 14.7%. Discover 53 high quality undervalued stocks or create your own screener to find better value opportunities.
JEF Discounted Cash Flow as at Feb 2026
Head to the Valuation section of our Company Report for more details on how we arrive at this Fair Value for Jefferies Financial Group.
For profitable companies, the P/E ratio is a useful way to think about value because it links what you pay directly to the earnings the business is generating today. Higher growth expectations and lower perceived risk usually justify a higher P/E, while slower expected growth or higher risk tend to line up with a lower, more cautious multiple.
Jefferies Financial Group currently trades on a P/E of 19.18x. That sits below the Capital Markets industry average of 23.14x and also below the peer group average of 20.31x, which might initially make the stock look relatively inexpensive compared to its sector.
Simply Wall St also calculates a proprietary “Fair Ratio” for Jefferies Financial Group of 18.47x. This is designed to be more tailored than a simple peer or industry comparison because it adjusts the preferred multiple for factors such as the company’s earnings growth profile, its industry, profit margins, market cap and specific risk characteristics. Comparing the Fair Ratio of 18.47x with the actual P/E of 19.18x suggests the shares are trading at a modest premium to what this framework would consider fair.
Result: OVERVALUED
NYSE:JEF P/E Ratio as at Feb 2026
P/E ratios tell one story, but what if the real opportunity lies elsewhere? Start investing in legacies, not executives. Discover our 22 top founder-led companies.
Earlier we mentioned that there is an even better way to understand valuation, so let us introduce you to Narratives. Narratives let you attach a clear story about Jefferies Financial Group to the numbers you care about, such as your assumed fair value and expectations for future revenue, earnings and margins.
A Narrative links three pieces together: the company story you believe, the financial forecast that follows from that story, and a resulting fair value that you can compare with today’s share price to help you decide whether the stock looks attractive or not.
On Simply Wall St, Narratives sit inside the Community page. Millions of investors use them as a straightforward tool to track their thesis, see how their fair value compares with the current market price, and watch that view adjust automatically when new information like earnings updates or news is added to the model.
For Jefferies Financial Group, one investor might build a Narrative that points to a relatively low fair value based on cautious assumptions. Another might see a much higher fair value using more optimistic expectations, and the platform keeps both views updated as fresh data comes in.
Do you think there’s more to the story for Jefferies Financial Group? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!
NYSE:JEF 1-Year Stock Price Chart
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Companies discussed in this article include JEF.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
By Isabel Wang, Gordon Gottsegen and Joseph Adinolfi
‘It seems like there are two different markets right now,’ strategist says
Markets are looking increasingly divided between retail favorites and steady performers.
Wall Street lived a tale of two markets this week.
Once-popular momentum trades that showered investors with outsize rewards last year finally hit the skids. Wednesday was the worst single-day showing for popular momentum stocks since 2022, based on the performance of Goldman Sachs’s U.S. High-Beta Momentum Index – although the index rallied back to finish the week essentially unchanged.
Meanwhile, boring yet steady value plays quietly stacked wins, with the value-heavy Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA topping 50,000 pointsw for the first time ever. A fund that tracks the equal-weighted version of the S&P 500 index RSP finished the week at a fresh record high, outperforming its capitalization-weighted sibling SPY by the widest weekly margin since 2020, FactSet data showed.
“It seems like there are two different markets right now,” said Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide, during an interview with MarketWatch. “There are the ones that are levered and volatile, and the ones that are just set-it-and-forget-it.”
Silver (SI00) and bitcoin (BTCUSD) were two examples of the type of levered, retail-driven markets Hackett was referring to. Over the past few months, individual investors have become much more involved in the silver trade, he noted.
Based on trading in the most active futures contract, silver has fallen by more than 35% from its intraday record north of $120 an ounce, Dow Jones Market Data showed. Bitcoin briefly erased more than half of its value earlier this week, before a Friday rebound pushed it back up to the $70,000 threshold – though it’s still well below its record high north of $126,000 from October.
Software stocks, which minted gains for investors for years, also got hammered this week. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF IGV fell 8.7% this week, its worst showing since April 4, FactSet data showed.
“Active traders can and do migrate between hot stocks and sectors, and when those sectors fall out of favor, they decline,” said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers. In many cases, momentum trades are being kept afloat by the speculations rather than valuations, he added.
At the other end of the spectrum, previously lagging cyclical and defensive names outperformed the broader market this week, helping buck the downtrend for the major indexes. The S&P 500’s consumer-staples sector XX:SP500.30 was the best performer among the large-cap index’s 11 sectors, up 6% for the week. The industrials XX:SP500.20 and materials XX:SP500.15 sectors were also up 4.7% and 3.5% for the week, respectively, according to FactSet data.
The broad-based gains resulted in more stocks within the S&P 500 moving higher, even as weak performance by the index’s dominant tech names pushed it lower. On Wednesday, 92 S&P 500 members tallied fresh 52-week closing highs, the most since November 2024, Dow Jones Market Data showed.
The split underscores the sentiment tug-of-war on Wall Street – with risk-takers chasing hype, while steady hands take a more measured approach. A crucial takeaway of the week might be that as investor sentiment and leveraged bets continue to drive swings in broad swaths of the market, more wild moves could be in store.
See: Dow closes above 50,000 for first time after rough week for U.S. stock market
Wild swings in individual stocks and assets still managed to bleed into the major U.S. equity indexes, with all three snapping back and forth like a yo-yo. The Dow Jones Industrial Average managed a weekly gain of 2.5% as stocks staged a strong recovery on Friday.
The rebound gave the S&P 500 SPX and the Nasdaq Composite COMP their best days since at least Nov. 24, yet both tech-heavy indexes ended the week down 0.1% and 1.8%, respectively, according to FactSet data.
To be sure, there was no obvious villain, like a geopolitical shock or tariff threats, sending the market into a tailspin this week. Instead, it was just a steady stream of corporate and economic headlines chipping away at risk appetite, forcing both speculators and value investors to second-guess everything they thought they knew.
It started with a new automation tool from Anthropic, the developer behind the Claude chatbot, which on Tuesday sparked a selloff across software and financial-services stocks due to concerns that AI could erode their business models. The anxiety then spilled into the broader market on Thursday after Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) issued weaker-than-expected guidance for the first quarter and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) (GOOG) doubled its planned AI spending for 2026. Together, these developments reignited fears over whether AI will truly live up to the hype.
Other macro concerns, such as a weakening labor market and upcoming nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran, also weighed on market sentiment.
“People are actually going back to something everyone’s forgot about for a long time – you’re actually seeing some value [investing] or fundamentals coming back in,” said Ben Fulton, CEO of WEBs Investments.
In Fulton’s views, momentum stocks did “run far ahead of fundamentally sound companies,” so investors need to “realign the car” while markets are moving quickly.
-Isabel Wang -Gordon Gottsegen -Joseph Adinolfi
This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.