Category: 3. Business

  • Malaysia moves to tighten rules for expats, raising fears of talent flight | Business and Economy News

    Malaysia moves to tighten rules for expats, raising fears of talent flight | Business and Economy News

    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia – Until recently, Sanjeet, a business consultant from India, thought of Malaysia as home.

    After living and working in the Southeast Asian nation for more than a decade, he had gotten comfortable with the climate, people and way of life.

    Recommended Stories

    list of 4 itemsend of list

    “Once I had crossed the five-year mark, Malaysia seemed like an ideal long-term choice,” Sanjeet, who is in his 40s and asked to use a pseudonym, told Al Jazeera.

    “One gets used to what Malaysia has to offer.”

    But after a recent move by the Malaysian government to reduce the country’s reliance on foreign workers, Sanjeet’s plans – and those of thousands like him – have been plunged into doubt.

    From June onwards, the minimum salary threshold for foreign workers to obtain a visa will be raised as much as two-fold, and workers’ length of stay will be capped at five or 10 years.

    “What was surprising was that this came out of the blue,” Sanjeet said.

    “It does leave room for doubt in terms of long-term plans, which include things like buying a house or car here.”

    Malaysia, which transformed into one of Southeast Asia’s most developed economies after gaining independence from Britain in the 1960s, has been an attractive destination for foreign labour for decades.

    Many of the 2.1 million documented foreign workers in the country take on manual labour for salaries of around the monthly minimum wage of 1,700 ringgit ($430).

    A much smaller pool of foreign workers is employed in highly-paid specialised sectors such as finance, semiconductors, and oil and gas.

    In 2024, Home Affairs Minister Saifuddin Nasution said the country’s highly-salaried expatriate population – estimated at about 140,000 people – pumped about 75 billion ringgit ($19bn) into the domestic economy and contributed about 100 million ringgit ($25m) in taxes each year.

    A couple enjoy the view of the skyline in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on September 18, 2024 [Vincent Thian/AP]

    Malaysia’s pool of foreign labour has been a focus of growing debate in the nation of 34 million people in recent years.

    In the latest five-year national policy strategy released in 2025, the government warned that a “continuous reliance” on low-skilled foreign workers had hampered the adoption of critical technology in the economy.

    “This issue induced a ripple effect in the labour market, including the dominance of low-skilled and (low)-wage jobs, wage distortions as well as slow productivity growth,” the authors of the 13th Malaysia Plan said.

    As part of efforts to encourage the hiring of locals and boost incomes in a country where the average monthly wage is about $700, the government plans to slash the proportion of foreigners in the workforce from 14.1 percent in 2024 to 5 percent by 2035.

    In January, the Ministry of Home Affairs said tighter requirements for foreign workers would be extended to higher-paid expatriates to “support sustainable economic growth while strengthening the development of local talents”.

    Under the new rules, the minimum monthly salaries for three categories of work permit will be raised from 10,000 to 20,000 ringgit ($2,500 to $5,000), 5,000 to 10,000 ringgit ($1,260 to $2,520), and 3,000 to 5,000 ringgit ($760 to $1,260), respectively.

    On top of the higher salary floors, expatriates’ duration of stay will be limited, and employers will need to put in place plans for recruiting local talent after their sojourn ends.

    UK native Thomas Mead, who has been working in Malaysia since late 2022, said the government’s plans had left some expats feeling uncertain about their future.

    “There have always been rules in place, including minimum salary requirements,” Mead, a 28-year-old wealth manager, told Al Jazeera.

    “However, the jump from RM10,000 to RM20,000 was quite a shock.”

    After falling in love with Malaysia’s culture and food as a student, Mead returned to the country to work, and recently bought a property in Kuala Lumpur with a view to putting down roots.

    “I’ve heard some expatriates starting to talk about relocation options if they’re forced to,” he said, saying many would be “reluctant” to leave.

    Air Asia
    AirAsia planes on the tarmac at Kuala Lumpur International Airport Terminal 2 in Sepang, Malaysia, on January 21, 2026 [Hasnoor Hussain/Reuters]

    Douglas Gan, the Singaporean founder of a venture capital fund with portfolio companies in Malaysia, said the changes would drive up expenses for companies previously drawn by the country’s affordable costs.

    Gan said the new rules would be “challenging” for those recruiting overseas talent who currently qualify for visas under lower salary thresholds, giving the example of engineers from second-tier cities in China.

    “If salaries increase to 10,000 ringgit, companies definitely won’t bring them here,” he told Al Jazeera.

    Gan said he was not against moves to tighten the requirements for foreign labour, but expressed hope that the government would consider the impact on different industries instead of taking a “blanket approach”.

    “For businesses already in Malaysia, we’re taking a wait-and-see approach,” he said.

    Leonardo, an Indonesian who works in Malaysia in the computer games sector, said the changes would see him downgraded from the second to the third employment pass category.

    He had hoped to settle down in Malaysia and eventually bring his mother to live in the country, but now wonders if that will be possible.

    “My mum is alone and living in Indonesia. There was a thought that if I could settle here, I could bring her over,” he said.

    Wan Suhaimie, head of economic research at Kenanga Investment Bank in Kuala Lumpur, said firms could only hire locals when workers with the necessary skills were available.

    “The long-run gain depends less on blocking expats and more on whether Malaysia can actually supply the skills,” he told Al Jazeera.

    He said the doubling of salary thresholds had come as a shock, and foreign workers on the second-tier employment pass were not extravagant hires but core managers, engineers and specialists.

    “Tenure limits can work for skills transfer, but only if succession plans are real and not just paperwork,” he said.

    KL
    A KL Monorail train approaches its station in downtown Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on February 8, 2022 [Mohd Rasfan/AFP]

    Anthony Dass, the chief executive of FSG Advisory, a strategic advisory firm, said the new policy could increase costs for firms relying on mid-tier expat labour.

    How Malaysians benefit will depend on how the government implements policies to develop the local workforce, Dass said.

    “The measures are directionally consistent with strengthening the local talent pipeline, but complementary reforms in capability building and industry upgrading will determine the outcome,” he said.

    Joshua Webley, a 33-year-old business manager from the UK who is married to a Malaysian citizen, said that while the higher bar would make it harder for some foreigners to relocate to the country, it would not stop those with the right skills.

    “If you come here to Malaysia, you have to be skilled enough,” Webley told Al Jazeera.

    “For those high-skilled workers, Malaysia will still be a shining light for relocation.

    “For a few people, it might be a bad situation, but I think a year from now it will be perceived as normal,” he added.

    Others, such as Sanjeet, are less sanguine.

    “If Malaysia pursues these policies without a comprehensive rationale, then… people like me will look for alternatives such as Vietnam, Thailand and elsewhere, which have favourable policies for expats,” he said.

    Continue Reading

  • Rocket stocks soar on reports Musk's SpaceX set to file for share sale – BBC

    Rocket stocks soar on reports Musk's SpaceX set to file for share sale – BBC

    1. Rocket stocks soar on reports Musk’s SpaceX set to file for share sale  BBC
    2. SpaceX Aims to File for IPO as Soon as This Week  The Information
    3. SpaceX IPO Speculation Ignites Global Rally in Satellite Stocks  streamlinefeed.co.ke
    4. What Is SpaceX? How Musk Rewrote the Rules of Space in 20 Years? In-Depth Analysis From Company Background to IPO Prospects  TradingKey
    5. SpaceX secondary trades raise risks over share ownership  Tech in Asia

    Continue Reading

  • The payment system puts a floor on the Fed’s balance sheet

    The payment system puts a floor on the Fed’s balance sheet

    If the Federal Reserve wants to shrink its massive balance sheet—as President Trump’s nominee to be the next Fed Chair,  Kevin Warsh, advocates—it must find ways to reduce the demand by banks for reserve deposits at the Fed or risk severe disruptions to money markets, according to a paper to be discussed at the Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA) conference on March 26.

    On the asset side of its balance sheet ($6.6 trillion in mid-March), the Fed holds mainly Treasury securities and government-guaranteed mortgage-backed securities. The Fed’s largest liability is in the form of reserve balances, currently totaling about $3 trillion. These are deposits held at the Fed by banks. The Fed controls short-term interest rates primarily through the interest rate it pays on those balances.

    “If the Fed were to significantly reduce the size of its balance sheet, the supply of reserve balances would need to be reduced by about the same amount,” writes the paper’s author, Darrell Duffie of Stanford University.

    Advocates of a large balance sheet argue that the resulting ample supply of reserves allows the Fed to easily control short-term interest rates. But critics maintain it is not economically healthy for the Fed to dominate money markets and that the Fed’s Treasury securities holdings create the perception that the Fed is helping to finance the federal deficit.

    “You don’t want the Fed to smother the financial system but if you were to immediately make the balance sheet much smaller, you will blow up money markets. Nobody wants that,” the paper’s author, Duffie said in an interview with the Brookings Institution.

    Before the 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis, the Fed’s balance sheet was less than $900 billion. It ballooned to more than $4.5 trillion as the Fed purchased securities, at first to calm financial markets and then to support the economy by lowering longer-term interest rates. The Fed began to shrink its balance sheet in 2014 but ran into trouble in September 2019 when interest rates spiked because banks were reluctant to lend reserves to money-market participants.

    Figure 1

    The Fed again expanded its balance sheet (to nearly $9 trillion in 2022) to support markets and the economy during the COVID-19 pandemic. And, again, the Fed reduced its  balance sheet until late last year, after money market strains emerged from an apparent shortage of reserves.

    Post-Global Financial Crisis liquidity regulations that require banks to prove they would not need to borrow from the Fed under almost all circumstances explain much of banks’ preference for maintaining high reserve levels. Also, before the crisis, the Fed did not pay interest on reserve balances so banks had a strong incentive to lend balances they did not need.

    If the Fed decides to reduce its balance sheet, Duffie’s BPEA paper explores four approaches for doing this. First, the Fed could revise its liquidity regulations so that banks feel less pressured to conserve their reserve balances. Second, it could change the operations of Fedwire (the Fed’s largest payment system) so that banks could make their outgoing payments with incoming payments and thus need fewer reserves at the start of each day. Third, the Fed could tier interest rates on reserves, paying a lower interest rate on reserve balances beyond a specified target or quota, thus giving banks a strong incentive to lend these extra balances. And, fourth, the Fed could smooth the path of reserves by offsetting unintended shocks to the supply of reserve balances, for example those that occur at the end of each quarter.

    “Any of these changes could have a moderate or large effect on the total demand for reserves. In combination, their effects on the total size of the Fed’s balance sheet could be quite significant,” Duffie said in the interview.

    However, he noted that if the Fed ends up holding fewer long-term Treasury securities (thus placing more of them with private holders), then the federal government would probably need to pay a slightly higher average interest rate on its debt.

    CITATION

    Duffie, Darrell. 2026. “The Payment System Puts a Floor on the Fed’s Balance Sheet.” BPEA Conference Draft, Spring.

    The Brookings Institution is committed to quality, independence, and impact.
    We are supported by a diverse array of funders. In line with our values and policies, each Brookings publication represents the sole views of its author(s).

    Continue Reading

  • Fitch Revises Outlook on New Zealand's LGFA to Negative on Sovereign Rating Action; Affirms at 'AA+' – Fitch Ratings

    1. Fitch Revises Outlook on New Zealand’s LGFA to Negative on Sovereign Rating Action; Affirms at ‘AA+’  Fitch Ratings
    2. New Zealand outlook cut to negative by Fitch as debt concerns mount  investingLive
    3. The Huddle: Should we really be worried about New Zealand’s economy?  Newstalk ZB
    4. Credit ratings agency downgrades New Zealand’s outlook to ‘negative’  1News
    5. Fitch Ratings affirms New Zealand’s AA+ foreign-currency IDR, while revising the long-term outlook to Negative  VT Markets

    Continue Reading

  • Samsung Takes Its Browser Beyond Mobile, Extending Agentic AI Across Devices – Samsung Global Newsroom

    Samsung Takes Its Browser Beyond Mobile, Extending Agentic AI Across Devices – Samsung Global Newsroom

    Samsung Electronics today announced the official launch of Samsung Browser for Windows, extending its popular mobile browser experience to PC with seamless cross-device continuity and new agentic AI capabilities designed to make the browsing experience easier and more intuitive.

    Browse Seamlessly From Mobile to PC

    Samsung Browser for Windows bridges the gap between devices, allowing users to seamlessly continue browsing as they move between mobile and PC. Beyond simple synchronization of bookmarks and browsing history, users can pick up exactly where they left off.

    For instance, users can continue exploring the same webpage when moving between mobile and PC, creating a more seamless cross-device experience.1

    With Samsung Pass integration, users can securely store personal information and sign in to websites or autofill profiles with ease.3

    ▲ Samsung Pass securely autofills login credentials and personal information across devices.

    A New Way to Experience the Web With Agentic AI

    Samsung is introducing a new AI-powered assistant built into Samsung Browser that brings agentic AI directly into the browsing experience in partnership with Perplexity. Samsung Browser is designed to understand natural language and the context of the page users are viewing, as well as activity across tabs, making it easier to explore content and take action.4 This new layer of intelligence does more than answer questions about the webpage, enabling users to manage tabs, navigate browsing history and stay productive without ever leaving the browser.

    • Intelligent Content Understanding and Comprehensive Response: Samsung Browser understands the specific context of the webpage users are currently viewing to provide more relevant and optimized solutions. For instance, while planning a trip to Seoul, users can ask the browser to create a four-day travel plan based on the page currently in view. Samsung Browser analyzes the content and generates a structured plan that can be easily organized and customized in the user’s preferred format.
    • A Faster, Smarter Way to Search: Powered by advanced natural language understanding, Samsung Browser enables users to browse the web with speed and efficiency. Users can now get the right information instantly without manually sifting through countless webpages. Furthermore, Samsung Browser extends this intelligence to video content; by understanding the context within a video, it can find the specific part users are looking for and start playback from that exact moment.
    • Retrieving the Right Page From Browsing History: Instead of relying on keywords or dates, users can search their browsing history using natural language to find things like the smartwatch they were looking at last week.
    • Multi-tab Context Awareness: Users no longer need to click through multiple tabs to compare information. Samsung Browser can summarize and compare content across multiple tabs all at once. This makes it easy to get key insights from different sources in a single view.

    Availability

    Samsung Browser for Windows will be available on devices running Windows 11 and Windows 10 (version 1809 and above). Agentic AI features in Samsung Browser on both Windows and Android5 are currently supported in South Korea and the United States, with expansion to additional markets expected in the future. Users can learn more about Samsung Browser at browser.samsung.com.


    Continue Reading

  • CrowdStrike and IBM Expand AI Security Partnership for Agentic SOC Transformation

    CrowdStrike and IBM Expand AI Security Partnership for Agentic SOC Transformation

    Expanded strategic collaboration brings together Charlotte AI with IBM ATOM for coordinated, machine-speed response and integrates the Falcon platform with IBM Consulting’s managed security services and X-Force Cyber Range

    AUSTIN, Texas; ARMONK, N.Y.; and RSA 2026, San Francisco – March 25, 2026 – CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) and IBM today announced an expansion of their strategic collaboration to advance agentic SOC transformation.

    The expanded collaboration integrates CrowdStrike® Charlotte AI™ with IBM’s Autonomous Threat Operations Machine (ATOM), IBM’s autonomous SOC orchestration engine, for coordinated, machine-speed investigation and containment. It also extends the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform into IBM Consulting’s managed Threat Detection and Response services and global X-Force Cyber Range experiences, where the two companies will offer immersive cyber crisis simulations to help organizations prepare for emerging threats.

    AI is accelerating the velocity of adversary operations and shrinking the defender’s window to respond. The average eCrime breakout time has dropped to 29 minutes, with the fastest observed in just 27 seconds, while attacks targeting public-facing applications are up 44% from the prior year, according to the CrowdStrike 2026 Global Threat Report and IBM’s 2026 X-Force Threat Intelligence Index. As threats move faster and expand across cloud environments, security teams need coordinated detection and containment at machine speed.

    Within the SOC, IBM ATOM and Charlotte AI can now work together to analyze detections across endpoint, identity, and cloud environments, applying enterprise context to coordinate and execute containment decisions. Together, they streamline investigation and response to reduce manual handoffs and help teams act before threats spread.

    “Enterprises trust IBM to advance their security programs,” said Daniel Bernard, chief business officer, CrowdStrike. “With Charlotte AI helping to deliver investigation, containment, and operational response, IBM’s autonomous threat operations machine (ATOM) and cyber threat management services are battle-ready to defend against modern threats.”

    “Organizations are under pressure to accelerate response without increasing complexity,” said Dave McGinnis, Vice President, Global Managed Security Services, IBM. “By combining IBM ATOM with CrowdStrike’s Charlotte AI and delivering managed Threat Detection and Response services and Cyber Range validation with the Falcon platform, we’re helping enterprises operationalize coordinated, AI-driven response in real-world environments.”

    Together, CrowdStrike and IBM are leading agentic SOC transformation with a unified execution model for modern enterprises.

    About CrowdStrike

    CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk – endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data.

    Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-class AI, the CrowdStrike Falcon® platform leverages real-time indicators of attack, threat intelligence, evolving adversary tradecraft and enriched telemetry from across the enterprise to deliver hyper-accurate detections, automated protection and remediation, elite threat hunting and prioritized observability of vulnerabilities.

    Purpose-built in the cloud with a single lightweight-agent architecture, the Falcon platform delivers rapid and scalable deployment, superior protection and performance, reduced complexity and immediate time-to-value.

    CrowdStrike: We stop breaches.

    Learn more: https://www.crowdstrike.com/

    Follow us: Blog | X | LinkedIn | Instagram

    Start a free trial today: https://www.crowdstrike.com/trial

    © 2026 CrowdStrike, Inc. All rights reserved. CrowdStrike and CrowdStrike Falcon are marks owned by CrowdStrike, Inc. and are registered in the United States and other countries. CrowdStrike owns other trademarks and service marks and may use the brands of third parties to identify their products and services.

    About IBM

    IBM is a leading global hybrid cloud and AI, and business services provider, helping clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. Thousands of governments and corporate entities in critical infrastructure areas such as financial services, telecommunications and healthcare rely on IBM’s hybrid cloud platform and Red Hat OpenShift to affect their digital transformations quickly, efficiently and securely. IBM’s breakthrough innovations in AI, quantum computing, industry-specific cloud solutions and business services deliver open and flexible options to our clients. All of this is backed by IBM’s legendary commitment to trust, transparency, responsibility, inclusivity and service.

    For more information, visit https://research.ibm.com. 

    Media Contacts:


     


    Continue Reading

  • Global Economic Model – Modelling the Iran Conflict: Quantifying US Economic Impacts

    Global Economic Model – Modelling the Iran Conflict: Quantifying US Economic Impacts

    Join us on Tuesday March 31 for a live demonstration of Oxford Economics’ Global Economic Model – Modelling the Iran Conflict: Quantifying Economic Impacts.

    The Iran conflict is causing a wide-range of forecast impacts, from energy markets and inflation, to both US and global growth. During this session, our economists will demonstrate how Oxford Economics’ Global Economic Model can quantify alternative scenarios, showing how shocks such as oil supply disruptions transmit through trade, inflation, growth and monetary policy responses across the global economy. We will also walk through our analysis of the more granular impacts of the conflict on the US consumer and businesses.

    Please send through any questions on the functionality and capability of the model in advance, and we will address as many of these queries as we can during the session.

    This webinar is being held on our new platform, ON24. If you do not receive your confirmation email, please check your junk and spam folders.

    Speakers

    Michael Pearce

    Michael Pearce is Chief US Economist at Oxford Economics, based in New York. He leads US macroeconomic research and forecasting, and his team is ranked among Bloomberg’s top forecasters for major US economic indicators. Before joining Oxford Economics, Michael was a senior economist on the US team at Capital Economics and worked at HM Treasury in the UK. He holds degrees in Economic History from the London School of Economics and in Economics from University College London, and has lived and worked in the UK and Switzerland.

    Chief US Economist

    Matthew Martin

    Matthew Martin

    Matt is a Senior US Economist at Oxford Economics. He produces commentary on high frequency data including trade and inflation and contributes to the forecasting of the US economy. Matt’s research has focused on creating proprietary data to measure the health of economy.

    He has a masters degree in economics from New York University, and a bachelors degree in international business and economics from the University of South Carolina.

    Senior US Economist


    Continue Reading

  • Stock market news for March 25, 2026

    Stock market news for March 25, 2026

    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at the opening bell in New York on March 24, 2026.

    Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images

    Stocks jumped on Wednesday as oil prices pulled back and traders hoped the U.S. and Iran could reach an agreement for a ceasefire.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 305.43 points, or 0.66%, and closed at 46,429.49. The S&P 500 rose 0.54% to 6,591.90, and the Nasdaq Composite advanced 0.77% to end at 21,929.83.

    The Associated Press, citing unnamed officials in Islamabad, reported that Iran has received a 15-point proposal from the U.S. to end the war. The New York Times had first reported that the U.S. sent Iran a peace plan. The plan was delivered by way of Pakistan, that outlet said, citing two unnamed officials.

    Iran state media said the Middle Eastern country has rejected the U.S.’ ceasefire offer, however, instead laying out a five-point plan that includes granting Iran control over the Strait of Hormuz.

    Oil prices were under pressure Wednesday following those developments. West Texas Intermediate futures lost 2.2% to close at $90.32 per barrel. International Brent also fell 2.17% to settle at $102.22. Treasury yields also tumbled with oil prices.

    To be sure, the two countries appear to be very far apart. The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. is deploying the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East.

    The peace plan report comes after Trump earlier Tuesday said that the U.S. is “in negotiations right now” with Iran. He added that Tehran is “talking sense” and suggested it is eager to make a peace deal.

    The war has led to tremendous volatility for stocks this week. The market on Tuesday gave back some of its gains from Monday, which saw all three averages soaring more than 1% after Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that the U.S. and Iran have held “very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East.” However, Iranian state media denied reports of these direct talks between the two nations.

    “While there remain questions over who in Iran can curtail military activities as well as what will satisfy Israel interests, the market seems to be expressing a view that it wants to bounce higher from here,” said JPMorgan’s trading desk in a note. “Also, it is unclear that Iran would drop previous requests, including security guarantees against future aggression and reparation/compensation for losses incurred during this conflict.”

    Gains in shares of technology supported the broader market Wednesday, with Nvidia, AMD and Intel all jumping.

    Continue Reading

  • A people-first vision for the future of work in the age of AI

    A people-first vision for the future of work in the age of AI

    Many American workers associate artificial intelligence (AI) with layoffs, less satisfying work, and tech billionaires becoming ever more wealthy at their expense. They may be right.

    But one can also imagine a world in which the fruits of AI are instead invested in society. What if every K-12 student was taught by well-trained teachers in small classes, every patient interacted with unharried nurses, elders had the opportunity to age with dignity in their own homes or in high-quality residential care facilities, and everyone could find an affordable therapist when needed? And what if care workers were all people, not AI systems or robots, doing meaningful well-paid work to rebuild our communities and health, supported and paid for by the fruits of the AI economy? While tech companies target already underfunded care professions for replacement by AI, undermining our shared humanity and connections, we describe below a vision for an AI future that puts people first.

    On March 26, the AFL-CIO will host a national Workers First AI Summit to ensure workers help shape the policies governing AI in the workplace. The summit arrives at a moment when debates about AI and jobs often center on a single question: Will AI destroy jobs, change jobs, create new jobs, or leave work largely unchanged? There are doomsayers and champions on both sides of the debate. 

    But this framing misses a more immediate reality that was self-evident at a regional AI summit sponsored by the Cleveland AFL-CIO, Case Western Reserve University, and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) last month. Americans are already experiencing a steady decline in job quality: increased monitoring and surveillance, algorithmic scheduling, and declining autonomy—all against the backdrop of stagnant wage growth and a growing affordability crisis. Whether or not AI ultimately eliminates millions of jobs, many workers already feel that their work is being degraded or, to use the language of the day, “enshittified.”

    AI may accelerate this process, but it’s not the root cause. The decline in worker bargaining power, enervation of enforcement agencies like the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), and collapse of union membership all began decades ago, long before modern AI. Meanwhile, institutions like schools and hospitals—that both employ and serve millions of Americans—remain chronically understaffed. The result is a system with strong protections on paper but limited impact in practice.

    As a society, we have gradually come to accept the enshittification of work and associated degradation of both public and private services. Public servants are routinely underpaid and overburdened, working in institutions that lack the people and resources they need to deliver key services. Teachers, nurses, and social workers face growing administrative burdens and constant monitoring, while receiving stagnant or declining pay and benefits.

    Even sectors once known for worker autonomy are beginning to feel the pain. Silicon Valley was long seen as a bastion of professional agency, as tech companies routinely offered software engineers generous salaries and perks in an effort to attract and retain top talent. But those days are ending. Instead, tech companies are using both the fruits and threat of AI to push workers harder, resulting in longer hours, fewer jobs, and higher expectations for remaining workers. Some firms are even flirting with a version of China’s infamous “996” schedule, where work is required from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week. And engineers are thus gripped by anxiety about AI’s potential to transform or eliminate their jobs.

    They’re hardly alone. We’re all confronting a future in which many jobs fall victim to the AI revolution and many remaining roles are rendered unappealing by the ongoing demise of regulatory institutions, growth of insecurity, and normalization of management practices that would have seemed unthinkable to our grandparents. It’s no wonder that more than half of surveyed Americans fear that AI will take their jobs and replace their face-to-face relationships. We must not accept these imagined futures. 

    People-first labor policy proposals for the age of AI

    Protect and increase the role of people in the care workplace

    Imagining a better future for workers in the age of AI means protecting the role of people in the workplace. Some jobs should be done by humans: jobs that build human relationships and are important to society, like teaching and care-economy professions. These professions have long suffered from the enshittification of work, facing overcrowded classrooms, hospital closures, and outsized caseloads that are good for neither providers nor the people they serve. Instead, people-first policies, such as licensure and minimum staffing requirements, could expand the professional workforce and provide fruitful employment while improving job quality.

    Teaching offers an example. A key lever of student success is a small teacher-to-student ratio; small class sizes are a critical differentiator at most private schools. Yet public schools remain chronically underfunded with far too many students per teacher, leading to degraded learning experiences and teacher–student relationships. AI companies did not create this problem, but they could exacerbate it. A recent report found that students in classrooms using AI felt less connected to their teachers and peers. This is especially concerning given that teacher–student relationships are vital to many student outcomes, and many educators are raising concerns about the risks AI in the classroom presents to student learning.

    Rather than replacing teachers with AI, we should boost their numbers. Laws that mandate minimum staffing levels and allocate funding to train the school workforce could bring more teachers into the classroom and lower class sizes. This is not unprecedented: Minimum staffing levels are required in air traffic control and nuclear power plants, and many states already mandate a maximum number of students per teacher in child care and K-3. Similar requirements could be put in place for other care workers. Such workers could still use AI, but in ways they control and that benefit both workers and the people they serve. Indeed, many health care systems already use AI systems to aid notetaking—a use that has the potential to help nurses spend more time with patients.

    Develop institutions to support training, professionalism, and worker rights

    It’s not enough to create and protect these people-first jobs; if supply is to meet demand, we need training pathways that will allow more people to enter these careers at different points in the lifecycle. One hypothetical example of a mid-career transition involves software engineers. Many engineers, whose jobs are currently threatened by AI, have the knowledge and degrees required for math and science education, where there are already persistent teacher shortages. With targeted retraining programs and public funding, experienced engineers could transition into teaching careers that draw on their expertise. 

    But training alone also isn’t enough. Engineers went into tech rather than teaching for many reasons, including differences in income, prestige, and autonomy. A serious effort to build a pipeline from engineering to teaching would have to address these gaps by elevating the incomes and status of people-first professions. That means raising salaries, guaranteeing adequate staffing levels, and restoring professional autonomy so teachers and other care professionals are trusted as experts. By simultaneously investing in retraining pathways to expand the supply of qualified workers and strengthening these professions to increase demand for their expertise, policymakers could turn the threat of AI displacement into an opportunity to address longstanding shortages in critical public-facing fields. In interventions like these, we find an optimistic vision for the AI future. 

    Some of the institutions needed to facilitate such a transition already exist, albeit in diminished form, and could be adapted to serve this new vision. A revitalized NLRB, for instance, could once again help workers negotiate “the terms and conditions of their employment or other mutual aid or protection,” in line with its original mandate. The Fair Labor Standards Act might be amended to include minimum staffing levels in some industries, and the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor could be tasked with their enforcement. We could even use AI to support these enforcement efforts, treating it as a force multiplier in agencies that have always been understaffed.

    But other institutions will likely have to be built from scratch. The U.S. has never embraced post-employment training, let alone developed institutions to link the supply of trained workers to the demand for their skills. On the contrary, training in the U.S. has typically occurred either in schools, prior to employment, or on-the-job; neither approach works for mid-career workers in transition.

    Fortunately, other countries offer models of lifelong learning on which to draw, and we have many local experiments that might be scaled. If properly governed, new information technologies could facilitate the adaptation of these models, especially in conjunction with greater worker organization. It’s no coincidence, after all, that the most successful models of lifelong learning are found in European countries with powerful trade unions; by aggregating the interests of their members, and carrying out productive dialogue with employers, European unions are indispensable partners in the training process, and in so doing, keep their workers secure and countries competitive. Thus, reinvigorated regulatory and collective bargaining structures could go hand-in-hand with the development of a more robust approach to lifelong learning.

    Create tripartite institutions that encourage the co-design of AI

    Tripartite institutions that bring government, business, and labor unions to the table could support interventions like these by identifying additional jobs that need minimum staffing. But they could also serve as venues for the productive, participatory design of AI systems themselves. When AI systems are introduced from above, they tend to degrade working conditions to everyone’s detriment. At last month’s Cleveland AFL-CIO convening, for example, utility workers described client management software that reduces both their productivity and quality of work life by sending them on inefficient routes down unsafe streets. Their employer’s general-purpose systems simply weren’t designed for their use cases; employers by themselves are insufficiently familiar with the specifics of downstream use cases to design for them. If management and labor could collaborate on the design of bespoke software, however, they could achieve mutual gains.

    This is not wishful thinking. Computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University and the UNITE HERE union have co-designed an app that facilitates communication and record-keeping by guest room attendants in ways that ease communication about issues like missing supplies and minimize labor-management conflict. The result is a win-win that speaks to broader possibilities, like shop-floor problem-solving by trained manufacturing workers armed with data flows from automated equipment.

    Consultation of communities affected by AI use is already required for high-impact systems used by the federal government, including procured systems. But the post-hoc consultations required by the current rule do not allow workers the opportunity to shape these systems before deployment. Effective participatory design requires understanding and compensating it as work, giving workers voice, and balancing the tension between co-design in the context of specific use cases and the scale of AI systems. Government facilitation of tripartite participation (through grants and demonstration projects in the public sector) can help stakeholders achieve these goals and encourage the development of worker-centered AI.

    Addressing AI and labor displacement requires ambitious policy

    The American public is worried about the impact of AI in the workplace. But industry leaders are touting the technology’s potential while making enormous profits and doing everything in their power to bring innovations to market as fast as possible, with little regard for the people who may be harmed. The gap between the wealth of the elite and the average American is large and growing; AI has the potential to make this disparity even greater. Policymakers must meet the moment with a transformative vision for the future of work that puts people first.

    Continue Reading

  • Amgen Named One of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere

    Amgen Named One of the World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere

    Amgen has been recognized as one of the 2026 World’s Most Ethical Companies® by Ethisphere, a global leader in defining and advancing the standards of ethical business practices. The recognition underscores Amgen’s long-standing commitment to operating with integrity while advancing science to serve patients.

    The World’s Most Ethical Companies® designation is awarded to organizations that “lead with integrity, prioritize ethical business practices, and demonstrate a commitment to doing what’s right.”

    Companies are evaluated through Ethisphere’s proprietary Ethics Quotient® (EQ) framework, which assesses a company’s ethics and compliance program, culture, and governance practices.

    This recognition reflects how Amgen conducts its work every day, where ethics and compliance are core elements of the Amgen Values, embedded throughout the organization.

    “World’s Most Ethical Companies” and “Ethisphere” names and marks are registered trademarks of Ethisphere LLC.

     

    Continue Reading