1. Higher Post-operative Day 1 (POD1) pain scores were independently associated with increased 30-day infectious and non-infectious complications.
2. Infectious complications developed later (mean 6.5 days) than non-infectious complications (4.1 days).
Evidence Rating Level: 2 (Good)
Early postoperative pain is a significant concern following major abdominal surgery, with growing evidence linking its intensity to increased 30-day complication risks. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,000 patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), esophageal, liver, or pancreatic surgery at Radboud University Medical Center (2014–2020). Pain scores on postoperative day 1 (POD1) were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and complications were classified by Clavien-Dindo (CD) criteria. Results revealed 790 complications in 572 patients (36.7% infectious, 63.4% non-infectious), with infectious complications occurring later (mean 6.5 vs. 4.1 days, *p*<0.001). Logistic regression demonstrated that higher POD1 pain scores significantly predicted total complications (OR=1.132), CD severity (OR=1.131), infectious (OR=1.126), and non-infectious complications (OR=1.079). Covariates like age, ASA class, open surgery, and longer duration also contributed. The study highlights the role of early pain in impairing recovery (e.g., reduced mobility, immunosuppression) and underscores the need for optimized perioperative analgesia to mitigate complications.
Click to read the study in RAPM
Image: PD
©2025 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2 Minute Medicine, Inc.
The search for new ways to treat malaria — a disease that kills some 600,000 people a year, most of them children in Sub-Saharan Africa — may have just gotten a boost.
Chemists at UC San Francisco have found a way to rearrange the atoms in a new generation of malaria drugs to make them easier to put into pill form without forfeiting their effectiveness against the malaria parasite.
New malaria drugs are desperately needed. The parasite that causes the disease has developed resistance to today’s best therapies and is spreading from Southeast Asia into Africa.
“Now that drug resistance is in Africa, many more lives are at risk,” said Adam Renslo, PhD, professor of pharmaceutical chemistry in the UCSF School of Pharmacy and senior author of the paper. “These new molecules could give us the upper hand we need to control this deadly disease.”
The work, which appears Aug. 8 in Science Advances, was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
For centuries, malaria has been known for causing cyclical and sometimes deadly fevers. In the 1950s, chemists developed new and more potent malaria drugs based on quinine, an anti-malarial compound found in plants.
Over time, the parasites evolved to resist the best of these drugs, chloroquine, and the global health community scrambled to find new ones.
Today’s most essential anti-malarial therapies include a compound called artemisinin that is found in sweet wormwood, which is used in traditional Chinese medicine. As with quinine, artemisinin gave chemists inspiration to make more effective drugs.
Artemisinin was combined with other effective drugs into a cocktail, known as artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), that became the standard malaria treatment. But resistance appeared once again.
“We’ve tracked artemisinin resistance for years in Southeast Asia, but we’re now seeing it spread to Africa, where 95% of cases and 95% of deaths occur,” said Phil Rosenthal, MD, professor of medicine at UCSF and co-author of the paper. “Given how long it takes to develop new drugs, there is widespread consensus that we need better drugs to circumvent this resistance ASAP.”
Artefenomel, a newer artemisinin-inspired variant, was intended to replace ACTs in time to stanch the spread of artemisinin resistance. It was potent enough that scientists hoped it could cure malaria in a single dose. This would have been an improvement over ACTs, which must be taken for three days in a row to be effective.
“For a disease like malaria, you would ideally like to cure the patient with one pill or a handful of pills and be done with it,” Renslo said. “A multi-day regimen risks missing a dose.”
But artefenomel proved difficult to study in clinical trials. Because it resisted dissolving, it needed to be shaken up with a liquid and swallowed quickly. This finicky nature also made it hard to combine with other drugs in a pill.
Children also had trouble keeping the liquid form down after drinking it, making it hard to know whether they had received the intended dose. In January of 2025, artefenomel was pulled from clinical trials.
Renslo and his team realized that the symmetry of the artefenomel molecule might be the problem. Highly symmetrical molecules tend to clump into crystals that are slow to dissolve.
The scientists thought that a less-symmetric version of artefenomel might avoid this clumping and dissolve more readily, making it easier to put into pill form. Their first successful attempt at making this molecule proved them right when it disappeared immediately into a water-like solution.
The team continued tweaking the new molecules, testing how they worked against malaria parasites in cells, and then animals, and finally against artemisinin-resistant parasites sourced from blood samples from malaria patients in Uganda.
The optimized compound passed with flying colors: it was just as potent as artefenomel, and much more effective than artemisinin, against artemisinin-resistant parasites.
“We’re optimistic that a simple chemical change like this can pave the way for an effective successor to artemisinin,” Renslo said, “one that’s cheap to make and easy to combine with other anti-malarial drugs.”
Authors: Other UCSF authors are Matthew T. Klope, PhD, Poulami Talukder, PhD, Brian R. Blank, PhD, Jun Chen, PhD, Ryan L. Gonciarz, PhD, Priyadarshini Jaishankar, MS, Jenny Legac, Vineet Mathur, Avani Narayan, Juan A.Tapia, MS, and Aswathy Vinod. For all authors see the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (AI075045, AI139179, AI105106, and CA260860).
A big, new study shows women who are victims of stalking are at significantly higher risk of heart disease.
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
Heart disease is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, and many of the risk factors, like smoking or high blood pressure, are well known. But new research out today shows there’s something else to consider. Women who have experienced physical threats, specifically stalking, have a 41% higher risk of cardiovascular disease. NPR’s Katia Riddle reports.
KATIA RIDDLE, BYLINE: Being stalked is obviously incredibly scary and stressful, but it’s often thought of in terms of a psychological experience. This research links that psychological stress to declines in physical health. Rebecca Lawn is one of the researchers who worked on this study, which was put out by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
REBECCA LAWN: We knew that violence is not good for health, but it’s still something that’s not commonly considered in health care.
RIDDLE: The data comes from a study of more than 66,000 women nurses. Researchers followed their health over a period of 20 years.
LAWN: There’s so many types of violence that women experience, and stalking is one that is particularly understudied.
RIDDLE: The risk was especially high for women who had obtained a restraining order. That can be an indicator of severe stalking. For people in this group, the risk of developing cardiovascular disease was 70% higher than others. Liz Tobin-Tyler is a professor at Brown University who studies public health and women. She was not involved in the study. She says this research has practical implications for the entire field of health care.
LIZ TOBIN-TYLER: As a researcher who pays a lot of attention to violence against women and the effect of violence against women on their health, it’s critical that health care providers are aware of the linkages here.
RIDDLE: The study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health. Tobin-Tyler says she worries that longitudinal studies that look at risk factors for women are in jeopardy under the Trump administration. They’ve recently canceled funding both for the NIH and for various research efforts that focus specifically on women’s health.
TOBIN-TYLER: Now, if we’re not studying those things, we’re really going to lose out in terms of understanding a range of issues related to women’s health, including, as this study pointed out, cardiovascular disease.
RIDDLE: The study may just be about women, she says, but it’s relevant for every member of society.
Katia Riddle, NPR News.
(SOUNDBITE OF A-YUE CHAN’S “SINKING”)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts may vary. Transcript text may be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
A review study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine looks at the effect of weight loss before IVF on reproductive outcomes.
Prof Ying Cheong, Professor of Reproductive Medicine and Honorary Consultant in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, University of Southampton, said:
“We already know weight loss can help with fertility, but whether it improves IVF outcomes is far less certain. This review sheds some light, but most of the studies are small and at high risk of bias, so the results need cautious interpretation. IVF bypasses many obesity-related barriers, but what is still unclear is if delaying treatment for weight loss truly boosts success rates.
“This review of 12 trials found that weight loss before IVF was linked to higher overall pregnancy rates, mainly from unassisted conception, but the effect on live birth rates with assisted conception was uncertain. Whilst the pooled results look statistically significant, many individual interventions showed no benefit at all. Grouping very different approaches together risks comparing apples and pears, and leaves us unsure which, if any, are genuinely effective before IVF.”
Prof Bassel Wattar, Associate Professor of Reproductive Medicine and Medical Director of the ARU Clinical Trials Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, said:
“The study presented by Michalopoulou and colleagues provides interesting insights into the potential benefits of weight loss interventions for optimizing both natural and assisted fertility outcomes with assisted conception. While the findings indicate some promising signals, they must be interpreted with caution due to several methodological limitations. Notably, the majority of the included trials were characterized by small sample sizes and a high risk of bias. Additionally, there was considerable heterogeneity among the study populations, and four of the included trials excluded women with a body mass index (BMI) above 35—precisely the subgroup most likely to benefit from such interventions. Also, it’s only a modestly greater chance in absolute terms of fertility in the weight loss group, even though the reported odds are high, due to the small sample size included in this meta-analysis.
“Current evidence suggests that women with anovulatory infertility, particularly those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), may experience a resumption of natural fertility following substantial weight loss (5–10% of body weight). However, these findings remain limited by the paucity of adequately powered trials and insufficient data on live birth outcomes. This meta-analysis highlights the inconsistency in the available evidence and underscores the need for further research, particularly to determine whether intensive weight loss interventions – such as GLP-1 agonists or high-intensity dietary regimens (though it is important to note that GLP-1s are not recommended to be taken during or when trying for a pregnancy) – can restore natural fertility and reduce reliance on assisted conception methods. Furthermore, many patients are currently disadvantaged by the BMI threshold (<30) required to access assisted conception treatments within the NHS in the UK. Establishing reliable, safe, and effective weight loss interventions could enable thousands of patients to access timely IVF treatments and achieve healthier pregnancies with reduced risks. Nevertheless, additional data are required to fully assess the benefits of these interventions during pregnancy and beyond.”
Dr Channa Jayasena, Associate Professor / Consultant in Reproductive Endocrinology, Imperial College London, said:
“Obesity is one of the most common fertility problems for women. It can disrupt periods, and how the ovaries and womb work. Obesity is also a major cause of pregnancy complications. According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations, women with obesity are not eligible for NHS funding of fertility treatments such as IVF.
“This study has analysed the results from several studies which looked at whether weight loss improved the chances of pregnancy in women. Weight loss prior to fertility was associated with greater chances of becoming pregnant (either naturally or with IVF treatment). However, it is not clear whether IVF itself became more effective after weight loss.
“Weight loss improves virtually every aspect of health, so this study is a great illustration of its potential benefits for women affected by obesity. It is also important to consider that average weight loss in the analysed studies was achieved under 1 stone (5kg) – this means that achievable levels of weight loss may be enough to improve chances of women with obesity becoming pregnant. Unfortunately, obesity is most likely to affect the poorest in society, so weight loss offers might help disadvantaged couples have a baby when other avenues like IVF are not open to then.”
‘The Effect of Weight Loss Before In Vitro Fertilization on Reproductive Outcomes in Women With Obesity’ by Moscho Michalopoulou was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine at 22:00 UK time on Monday 11 August 2025.
DOI: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01025
Declared interests
Prof Ying Cheong: “No COI to declare.”
Prof Bassel Wattar: “No conflict of interest to declare.”
Dr Channa Jayasena: “No conflicts.”
Sex and pregnancy linked to reduced HCV treatment odds in OUD patients | Image Credit: © jarun011 – © jarun011 – stock.adobe.com.
Risk factors of not receiving direct-acting antiviral (DAA) prescription among hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients entering opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment include female sex and recent pregnancy, according to a recent study published in O&G Open.1
A 16-fold increase in HCV infections was observed in US patients from 1998 to 2018, increasing the prevalence of associated adverse outcomes such as perinatal transmission. DAAs have a success rate of over 95% for curing this condition, but only 39% of affected adults and 9% of reproductive-aged women receive DAA prescriptions.2
“Sex and gender disparities in access to DAAs have been described,” wrote investigators.1 “For example, among people who inject drugs, HCV incidence is higher among women, but men are 24% more likely to access DAAs.”
The study was conducted to compare DAA prescriptions between men and women and to determine the impact of past-year pregnancy on DAA prescription. Data for inpatient and outpatient claims was obtained from the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Multi-State Medicaid Databases.
Inpatient, outpatient, and prescription data were linked, and deidentification was performed. Participants were aged 18 to 64 years and were diagnosed with any OUD and HCV based on International Classification of Diseases codes. The date of OUD treatment initiation was reported as the index date.
Participants were organized by treatment episodes, beginning after a period of at least 45 days without record of OUD treatment. Treatment episodes had a duration of 360 days, and subsequent treatment episodes following this period were also evaluated. Prescription DAAs were reported as the primary outcome of the analysis.
HCV treatment initiation was defined as a first-time prescription for a DAA. These included velpatasvir, sofosbuvir, grazoprevir, daclatasvir, elbasvir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir, ritonavir, dasabuvir, simeprevir, ledipasvir, telaprevir, glecaprevir, boceprevir, and pibrentasvir.
Sex and pregnancy status were reported as exposure variables. Categories of sex included male and female as recorded in claims data. A recent pregnancy was determined by more than 1 claims data for any pregnancy-related condition within the prior 360 days.
Year of enrollment, age, health insurance type, psychiatric comorbidities, and race and ethnicity were reported as covariates. Investigators also collected information about co-occurring substance use disorders, hospitalization for drug-related poisoning, type of OUD treatment, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.
There were 22,347 episodes from 19,668 patients included in the final analysis, 45.1% of whom were men, 38.5% women without recent pregnancy, and 16.5% women with recent pregnancy. Most of these patients were aged at least 35 years, but women with recent pregnancy were more often aged 26 to 30 years.
Of patients, 90.8% were enrolled in Medicaid, 89.2% were non-Hispanic White, and 76% received psychosocial treatment without medications for OUD. The remaining received medications, with 12.6% prescribed buprenorphine, 6.7% methadone, 1.5% oral naltrexone, and 3.3% extended-release naltrexone.
The odds of being prescribed DAAs were significantly higher among men vs women, with rates of 40.6% for men, 35.7% for women without recent pregnancy, and 31.8% for women with recent pregnancy. Additionally, a hazard ratio (HR) for receiving HCV treatment of 1.19 was reported among men vs women.
When compared to women with recent pregnancy, men and women without pregnancy had adjusted HRs of 1.18 and 1.09, respectively, for receiving HCV treatment. Similar results were reported in a sensitivity analysis restricting the cohort to women with a pregnancy code at least 9 months before enrollment.
Overall, the results highlighted recent pregnancy as a barrier to HCV treatment, alongside potentially contributing to sex-based disparities in treatment. Investigators recommended additional research to determine optimal care delivery strategies in this population.
“Given the challenges described regarding postpartum linkage to HCV care, we suggest that pregnancy could be a window of opportunity for HCV treatment that must be further studied,” wrote investigators.
References