CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta vividly remembers the day he impaled himself on a wrought iron fence. He had just turned 12, and he was running through the neighborhood when he spontaneously decided to vault over a fence that he usually ran around. Except he didn’t quite make it.
“One of the spikes caught me on my side and went in the back area of my side and out the front,” Gupta says. “It was the skin, thankfully, as opposed to going into the chest or into the abdomen, which would have been much worse, but it was sort of a classic in-out sort of injury.”
Gupta says he was impaled for several minutes before his mother arrived to help hoist him off the fence. Looking back now, he remembers feeling a strange sense of euphoria when it happened, which he attributes to his body’s natural pain relief system.
“For some people, it reacts really vigorously — like really, really churns out a bunch of endorphins,” he says. “And so you could have this really sort of ironic situation where you’ve got a terrible injury and you’re almost laughing. It’s a very protective sort of response from the body. And not everyone responds the same way.”
In his new book, It Doesn’t Have to Hurt: Your Smart Guide to a Pain-Free Life, Gupta, a trained neurosurgeon, writes about pain — what causes it, and the various medications that can be used to treat it. He also reflects on ways to train the mind to minimize certain kinds of pain, using distraction and meditation.
“With pain, people are usually hyper-focused on a particular sensation. Being able to take them out of that hyper-focus can be really helpful,” he says. “The idea [is] that you could take someone’s pain score from really terrible pain to a zero out of 10 … for the 30 minutes that they are meditating. … I think the brain can be trained that way.”
It Doesn’t Have to Hurt, by Sanjay Gupta
Simon & Schuster
hide caption
toggle caption
Simon & Schuster
On mistakes the brain makes in processing pain
One of the best examples of how the brain can make a mistake is phantom limb pain … It was amputated, and yet it still hurts. I think that’s one of those sort of insights about the brain that I think led to a lot of learning about what exactly the brain’s role was with pain. If the brain’s the decider of pain, can it create pain as well? And the answer is yes.
Referred pain is another sort of mistake. So some people may be having what should be chest pain from a heart attack, but instead of having chest pain, they may have jaw pain. They may have just left arm pain. … And then there’s sorts of things where whatever the reason may be, the brain continues to play the loop of pain over and over again. I guess that’s not so much a mistake as it is maybe some sort of glitch, where the pain loop doesn’t stop and it just gets recycled over and over again, and that’s chronic pain. So those are some of the ways that the brain can sort of either mistake or misinterpret the signals and the pain.
On how pleasure can rewire brain
What I think is really interesting is that we have this system within our body, the endogenous opioid system. … This is like our internal morphine system, endorphin system. We can activate this system in all sorts of different ways. And by activating, I mean exactly what it sounds like. You just basically release a lot of these endorphins, these basically personalized morphine molecules all throughout your body. And one of the ways that they have shown can really facilitate that is to not just practice gratitude, but to actively practice gratitude. Meaning, actually savor something. I’m not just grateful for this ice cream cone. I’m so enjoying this ice-cream cone. I’m just not grateful for being able to look at this sunset. I am gazing at every different color in the sky and just taking it all in. It’s a very active form of gratitude. And it seems to be very associated with basically activating the endogenous opioid system, which is really fascinating to me.
On opioid drugs compared to the body’s natural opioid system
So many techniques and medications that we use in real life take their inspiration from our human body, and that’s one of them. … With your own opioid system, it is very, very sensitive. So it can turn on and it can turn off really, really well. So instead of having the lingering sort of side effects of opioids and sedation and all these other things, the opioids that you make yourself can just be washed away very, very quickly. …
I always say if the endogenous opioid system didn’t exist, women would probably never have more than one child. It can be a painful experience, but those [natural] opioids help with the pain. They help with the mood, and … [they] can actually inhibit your memory.
On how inflammation serves a purpose
I think for the most part, inflammation has sort of gotten a bad rap. … I think when you look at a sprained ankle, for example, and it looks swollen and red, the idea that I want to get rid of that. That’s associated with my pain makes intuitive sense. I think the idea that that inflammation serves a real purpose, that not only is it sort of helping protect the site of injury, but also sending all these various molecules to the site of injury to help with the healing. …
The thing about pain is that everyone’s threshold is going to be a little bit different. … I think for a lot of people, they think they need to take anti-inflammatories. Oh, this is bad, I gotta treat that, that inflammation’s not good, that’s hurting my body. But if I flip the script on you and I say, “It’s not bad for your body, that is exactly how your body is supposed to work. This is your body doing its job.”
On a new FDA approved non-opioid pain medication
The medication is called Suzetrigine. … It is a fascinating story of how it came about. There were these families of circus performers in Karachi, Pakistan. That got the attention of researchers, whatever, 25, 30 years ago. And they saw that these circus performers were able to do all these remarkable things, like they could put sharp things through their appendages and they could walk on hot coals and do all that sort of stuff. But what they found was that when they were doing this, they could feel the coals on their feet and they could feel that they were hot, they just didn’t have pain. … And that was pretty striking because it gave these researchers a clue as to which sodium channel blocker may be important when it came to just targeting pain and not sensation overall. They studied this family. They found that they had a gene in common. … And basically for 25 years, these researchers tried to replicate what that gene was doing in the body. … Now, one of the big challenges of creating a medicine like that is you didn’t want to take away pain forever. Pain has utility. It can keep you safe. It can teach you lessons. So they wanted to create a half-life for the drug. So they basically now have an oral formulation.
On Cannabis for pain
I walked into it thinking that if I really examined all this literature, there was going to be a pretty compelling case made for using cannabis for all sorts of different pains … and I walked away not as impressed, to be quite honest, as I thought I would be. And this is just the data talking. I will say it’s hard to collect this data when you’re dealing with a substance that has been a level one substance in the United States for a long time. It’s just really hard to get good studies. …
But having said that, the best available data seem to suggest that for about a third of the people, it could be pretty effective, and maybe in some cases as effective as the best other options for that neuropathic pain. … For about two-thirds of people, it really did not seem to be that effective. And this is the case, I think, for about a third of people, they get significant benefit. And we don’t quite know who those third of the people are. We don’t know what makes them different than the other two-thirds that they’re getting that kind of relief.
Monique Nazareth and Susan Nyakundi produced and edited this interview for broadcast. Bridget Bentz and Molly Seavy-Nesper adapted it for the web.
image:
Could a baby’s still-growing brain help set the stage for learning language? Princeton neuroscientists find surprising clues from chatty monkeys who share the power of babble.
view more
Credit: Francesco Veronesi, “Family of Common Marmoset”, Flickr (2014). Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
PRINCETON, N.J. — When a baby babbles and their parents respond, these back-and-forth exchanges are more than adorable-if-incoherent chatter — they help to build a baby’s emerging language skills.
But it turns out this learning strategy makes humans an oddity within the animal kingdom.
Only a handful of other species — including a few songbirds such as cowbirds and zebra finches — learn to “talk” by noting their parents’ reactions to their initial coos and gurgles.
How did humans become adept at learning language this way? A new study across multiple members of the primate family tree suggests the answer may lie, in part, in newborn babies’ fast-growing brains.
Published August 19 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the findings come from research on a squirrel-size monkey called the marmoset.
Babbling beyond humans
In the wild, marmosets use their high-pitched calls to stay in touch when they’re out of sight of one another in the thick dense forests of northeastern Brazil.
Just over a decade ago, while studying marmoset vocalizations, Princeton professor of neuroscience and psychology Asif Ghazanfar and colleagues noticed that baby marmosets go through a babbling phase, just like humans do.
As newborn marmosets grow, their first sputtering cries transform into the more whistle-like calls of adults. The researchers also found that baby marmosets who received more frequent adult feedback during their babbling bouts were quicker to catch on. They learned to produce adult-like calls significantly faster than the controls.
“That was a pretty big ‘aha!’ moment,” Ghazanfar said.
These studies, published in 2015 and 2017 by Ghazanfar with his then-postdoc Daniel Takahashi, now at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte in Brazil, were some of the first evidence of what appeared to be vocal learning in another primate.
But humans and marmosets last shared a common ancestor some 40 million years ago. Even our closest living relatives, chimpanzees, need very little tutoring to make the sounds of their kin.
“So that kind of presents a puzzle,” Ghazanfar said.
Since then, the researchers have been trying to figure out why humans and marmosets arrived at such similar learning strategies despite being so distantly related.
Neural growth spurt supports learning
In the new study, led by Princeton Ph.D. student Renata Biazzi, the researchers collected and analyzed previously published data on the brain development of four primate species including humans, marmosets, chimpanzees and rhesus macaques, from conception to adolescence.
The results suggest that, in early infancy, the brains of humans and marmosets are growing faster than those of other primates. Importantly, most of that growth happens not in the confines of the womb, as is the case for chimpanzees and macaques, but right around the time they are born and first experience the outside world.
In marmosets, as in humans, this also happens to be an incredibly social time, Ghazanfar said. That’s because marmoset moms, like human mothers, don’t raise their offspring without help. Babies interact with multiple caregivers who respond to every cry.
“They are a handful,” Ghazanfar said.
And because their brains are still developing, “that means that the social environment an infant is born into has a tremendous influence” on their learning, he added.
Using a mathematical model, the researchers were able to show how these early interactions, when coupled with rapid brain growth, set the stage for vocal skills to develop later on.
Baby talk
Next, the team plans to look into whether adult marmosets use specific sounds when interacting with infants, much like human adults use “baby talk” to communicate with our babies.
By looking at the only other primate whose infants are capable of using feedback to learn sounds, scientists hope to better understand how a child goes from cooing and babbling to, say, negotiating their way out of chores or joining the debate team.
This doesn’t mean that other primates can’t change up their calls later in life.
“We’re only talking about vocal learning during infancy,” Ghazanfar said. “This is the period when their brains are especially malleable.”
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (R01NS054898).
CITATION: “Altricial brains and the evolution of infant vocal learning,” Renata B. Biazzi, Daniel Y. Takahashi, and Asif A. Ghazanfar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Aug. 19, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421095122
# # #
About the Princeton Neuroscience Institute (PNI)
Founded in 2005, the Princeton Neuroscience Institute brings together researchers across disciplines at Princeton University to investigate how the brain gives rise to perception, cognition, and behavior. Led by Director Mala Murthy, PNI has built internationally recognized strengths in computational and quantitative neuroscience, advanced neurotechnology, and integrative approaches that connect molecular, cellular, and systems-level analyses with human cognitive studies. For more information, please visit: https://www.pni.princeton.edu
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Experimental study
Animals
Altricial brains and the evolution of infant vocal learning
19-Aug-2025
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death and disability for adults in the U.S. Recent projections from the American Heart Association suggest that by 2050, more than 45 million American adults will have clinical CVD and more than 184 million will have hypertension. As a result, inflation-adjusted direct health care costs related to CVD risk factors are projected to triple between 2020 and 2050, to $1.34 trillion annually, and direct costs related to clinical CVD conditions are projected to rise from $393 billion to $1.49 trillion. Thus, understanding early-life determinants of cardiovascular health behaviors and health factors are of particular interest.
In the first prospective study of social determinants from birth, and how they impact young adult cardiovascular health, researchers from Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and colleagues are investigating the upstream causes of cardiovascular disease – the factors that drive poor diet, a sedentary lifestyle, nicotine exposure, poor sleep, obesity, and adverse blood cholesterol, blood pressure and blood glucose levels. Known as the Future of Families Cardiovascular Health Among Young Adults (FF-CHAYA) Study, a new paper describes the rationale, study design, methods and characteristics of the FF-CHAYA cohort, a novel longitudinal study designed to examine associations of childhood social determinants with young adult cardiovascular health and early arterial injury.
In recent years, social determinants of health (SDoH) have received significant attention as upstream societal and structural factors that drive the propensity for beneficial or adverse health outcomes. While data on SDoH among middle-aged adults is increasingly available, as are longitudinal associations with downstream health outcomes, investigations examining the full array of SDoH in children and prospective associations with health outcomes is rare.”
Donald Lloyd-Jones, MD, ScM, corresponding author, professor of medicine at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and director of the Framingham Heart Study
Using the largest and longest running study of a representative group of children born between 1998-2000, the researchers examined more than 2,000 young adults (average age 23 years) from 22 cities across the U.S. who had been followed since birth. Families provided information on socioeconomic status, neighborhood conditions, environmental exposures, schools, behavior and other psychosocial factors up to seven times during early life. As young adults, all participants answered detailed questions about health status and health behaviors, and three-quarters of them had in-person examinations with checks on height, weight, body shape, blood pressure and blood drawn for clinical measures. Those same young adults also underwent sophisticated ultrasound imaging of the carotid arteries in the neck to look for signs of early arterial injury. The researchers are now linking their detailed sociological data with state-of-the-art, quantitative measures of cardiovascular health in young adulthood.
According to the researchers, detailing childhood social determinants helps target those factors that drive poor cardiovascular health across the life course. “Ultimately we hope it will guide pediatricians, family practitioners and even public health policy makers to those things that will launch children into better lifelong health trajectories,” adds Lloyd-Jones.
These findings appear online in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
Funding for this study was provided by grant R01 HL149869 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and supported by institutional funding from Princeton University and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Source:
Boston University School of Medicine
Journal reference:
Lloyd‐Jones, D. M., et al. (2025). Future of Families: Cardiovascular Health Among Young Adults Cohort Study: Rationale, Key Questions, Study Design, and Participant Characteristics. Journal of the American Heart Association. doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.042030
There was no benefit to modulating the intensity of antiplatelet therapy compared with standard antiplatelet therapy in high-risk patients who had undergone complex stenting procedures, according to late-breaking research presented in a Hot Line session today at ESC Congress 2025.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, such as clopidogrel, is generally given to patients after coronary stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) to prevent ischemic events, such as heart attacks (myocardial infarction). Principal Investigator, Professor Duk-Woo Park from Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, explained why the TAILORED-CHIP trial was carried out: “The optimal antiplatelet therapy is not well established for patients who have undergone complex PCI procedures and are at high risk of ischaemic events. We hypothesized that modulating the intensity of antiplatelet therapy over time, i.e. stronger inhibition in the early phase to reduce ischaemic events and weaker inhibition in the later phase to mitigate bleeding, may be beneficial in this high-risk population. The TAILORED-CHIP trial was designed to study whether early escalation with low-dose ticagrelor plus aspirin and late de-escalation with clopidogrel alone would be better than standard clopidogrel plus aspirin.”
The open-label randomized TAILORED-CHIP trial was conducted at 24 sites in South Korea. Patients with high-risk anatomical or clinical characteristics undergoing complex PCI were enrolled and were randomized 1:1 to receive tailored antiplatelet strategy consisting of early escalation (low-dose ticagrelor at 60 mg twice daily plus aspirin for 6 months) then late de-escalation (clopidogrel monotherapy for 6 months) or standard DAPT (clopidogrel plus aspirin for 12 months).
The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, unplanned urgent revascularization and clinically relevant bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, or 5) at 12 months. Prespecified secondary outcomes included major ischemic and clinically relevant bleeding events.
In total, 2,018 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 64.0 years and 17.1% were women. Most patients (93.7%) had PCI conducted in at least two major heart vessels during the same procedure.
At 12 months, the primary of outcome of net adverse clinical events was not significantly different between the groups, occurring in 10.5% of patients assigned to tailored antiplatelet therapy and in 8.8% of patients assigned to standard DAPT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90 to 1.58; p=0.21).
There was no significant difference in the incidence of major ischaemic events at 12 months between the tailored-therapy and DAPT groups (3.9% vs. 5.0%, respectively; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.19; p=0.25). However, the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding at 12 months was significantly higher in the tailored-therapy group (7.2%) compared with the DAPT group (4.8%; absolute difference 2.45%; 95% CI 0.37% to 4.53%; p=0.002). The incidence of major bleeding was similar in the tailored-therapy group (1.7%) and the DAPT group (1.5%; absolute difference 0.21%; 95% CI −0.89% to 1.31%; p=0.70).
Summarizing the findings, Professor Park said: “Our results suggest that a tailored strategy in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI does not provide a net clinical benefit. We observed an increase in bleeding complications without a significant reduction in ischaemic events. This challenges the notion that ‘more is better’ even in carefully selected patients at high ischemic risk undergoing complex PCI procedures. Standard 12-month DAPT remains appropriate.”
Source:
European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Fine-particulate air pollution can drive devastating forms of dementia by triggering the formation of toxic clumps of protein that destroy nerve cells as they spread through the brain, research suggests.
Exposure to the airborne particles causes proteins in the brain to misfold into the clumps, which are hallmarks of Lewy body dementia, the second most common form of dementia after Alzheimer’s disease.
The finding has “profound implications” for preventing the neurodegenerative disorder, which affects millions worldwide, with scientists calling for a concerted effort to improve air quality by cutting emissions from industrial activity and vehicle exhausts, improving wildfire management and reducing wood burning in homes.
“Unlike age or genetics, this is something we can change,” said Dr Xiaobo Mao, a neurologist at Johns Hopkins University in the US and the study’s lead investigator. “The most direct implication is that clean air policies are brain health policies.”
The researchers began by analysing hospital records of the 56.5 million US Medicare patients. They looked at those who were admitted for the first time between 2000 and 2014 with the protein damage. Armed with the patients’ zip codes, the scientists estimated their long-term exposure to PM2.5 pollution, airborne particles that are smaller than 2.5 thousandths of a millimetre. These can be inhaled deep into the lungs and are found in the bloodstream, brain and other organs.
They found that long-term exposure to PM2.5 raised the risk of Lewy body dementia, but had less of an impact on rates of another neurodegenerative brain disease that is not driven by the toxic proteins.
Lewy bodies are made from a protein called alpha-synuclein. The protein is crucial for healthy brain functioning, but can misfold in various ways to produce different kinds of harmful Lewy bodies. These can kill nerve cells and cause devastating disease by spreading through the brain.
To see if air pollution could trigger Lewy bodies, the team exposed mice to PM2.5 pollution every other day for 10 months. Some were normal mice, but others were genetically modified to prevent them making alpha-synuclein. The results were striking: in normal mice, nerve cells died off, leading to brain shrinkage and cognitive decline. The genetically modified mice were largely unaffected.
Further work in mice showed that PM2.5 pollution drove the formation of aggressive, resilient and toxic clumps of alpha-synuclein clumps that looked very similar to Lewy bodies in humans. Although the work is in mice, the findings are considered compelling evidence.
“Putting the two together, to me, indicates that there’s a pretty strong association with air pollution causing Lewy body dementia. We think it’s a very important driving factor for dementia,” said Ted Dawson, a senior author on the study and a professor in neurodegenerative diseases at Johns Hopkins. “There needs to be a concerted effort to keep our air clean.”
The work, published in Science, builds on previous studies that have found PM2.5s in people’s brains where damage has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease and reductions in intelligence.
“Our findings have profound implications for prevention because they identify air pollution as a modifiable risk factor for Lewy body dementia,” Mao told the Guardian. “By lowering our collective exposure to air pollution, we can potentially reduce the risk of developing these devastating neurodegenerative conditions on a population-wide scale.”
Last year, researchers at University College London and the Francis Crick Institute in London launched a project called Rapid, for Role of Air Pollution in Dementia, to investigate how the air we breathe may harm the brain.
“This is an important and compelling study that deepens our understanding of how air pollution can drive neurodegenerative disease,” said Prof Charles Swanton, a co-leader of the Rapid project and deputy clinical director at the Crick.
“By linking fine-particulate matter exposure to the biology of Lewy body dementia, it provides a mechanistic bridge between environmental exposure and disease pathology. More broadly, the work underscores the urgent need to understand and mitigate the impact of air pollution on dementia and disease risk more broadly, given its enormous and growing public health burden.”
After a cat located in San Fransisco, California, tested positive for H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1), the FDA, state and local public health and agriculture partners, and federal partners suggest that after further testing, there a link between the strain detected in the cat and certain lots of RAWR Raw Cat Food Chicken Eats, a product the cat ate prior to falling ill.
Frank Gärtner/stock.adobe.com
According to the FDA, the San Francisco Department Public Health (SFDPH) was notified a cat ate Lot CC 25 093 before becoming ill with H5N1 and euthanized.1 An initial PCR testing of the open product was conducted and detected H5N1. Subsequent whole genome sequencing (WGS) of a diagnostic sample from the cat and the open sample from Lot CCS 25 093 were performed by the USDA National Veterinary Service Laboratories.
The FDA then collected and tested 2 retail samples of the same RAWR Chicken Eats product with a different lot number (CC 25 077) and Sell By Date (09/18/26), each testing positive for Influenza A Virus, and a WFS performed on one sample was also positive for H5N1.1 WGS results also indicated that H5N1 from all 3 samples were within the same WGS cluster, indicating relatedness. This cluster involves a virus lineage that was detected from around November to December 2024, and is no longer circulating, supporting that the infected cat became ill from eating the Lot CCS 25 093 of the Chicken Eats product.1
RELATED: Additional cat food company announces recall over H5N1 concerns
NVSL testing of the cat, Lot CCS 25 093, and Lot CCS 25 077 identified the H5N1 as genotype B3.13. This genotype virus was found in other brands of raw poultry-based pet foods before that were associated with the illness or death of cats.1
The RAWR Raw Cat Food Chicken Eats, Sell by 09/18/26, and RAWR Cat Food Chicken Eats, Sell by 10/03/26, are sold in 2.5-pound resealable frozen plastic bags that have 40 1 ounce sliders in them in retail stores nationwide and online. The bags are white and yellow with black lettering, and have the lot code CCS 25 077 and CCS 25 093 printed in the center of the back of each bag.
At this time, the FDA is not aware of any human cases of HPAI contracted through exposure to contaminated food.
The H5N1 virus can result in illness and death in birds and mammals such as domesticated cats and large felids as well as dogs. For dogs however, their cases usually present with mild clinical signs and low mortality in comparison to cats. Currently, there are no known dogs with highly pathogenic avian influenza in the United Sates, but other countries have seen fatal cases. There is a list of animals that have tested positive for the virus on the USDA’s APHIS website.
Animals who have weak immune systems or are very old or young are especially at risk of contracting the virus. Animals with the virus typical present with the following signs, according to the American Veterinary Medical Association2:
While there have been no identified cases of H5N1 infections among anyone handling raw pet food products, humans are still at risk of being infected if an active virus gets into their eyes, nose, our mouth. Because of this, it is crucial for people to wash their hands after handling any pet food products as well as sanitize contact surfaces.
References
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental health condition characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and mania. It poses a substantial burden on global health, with an increasing incidence. Despite its prevalence, there exists a significant gap in understanding the underlying neuropathological mechanisms. Although mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in BD, the specific brain region damaged is not yet fully understood. A deeper understanding is essential for advancing research efforts and developing better therapeutic strategies.
In an effort to bridge the knowledge gap, a team of researchers in Japan investigated the thalamus and medial temporal regions of the brain-areas involved in mood regulation and cognitive function. The research team, led by Professor Tadafumi Kato from the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan, and Dr. Akito Nagakura from Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital, Japan, set out with a vision to change the trajectory of BD research. Their findings were published in Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences on September 2, 2025.
“Although animal models have pointed to the involvement of the paraventricular thalamic nucleus in the pathophysiology of BD, neuropathological knowledge is limited. In particular, we aimed to investigate whether the accumulation of certain neurodegenerative proteins, previously associated with neurological diseases, might play a role in the pathology of BD,” says Prof. Kato.
The research involved an analysis of postmortem brain tissue, specifically the paraventricular thalamus and medial temporal regions, which were studied in detail. The postmortem tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical analyses using antibodies targeting key neurodegenerative markers, including phosphorylated tau, amyloid β, α-synuclein, and TDP-43. Additionally, markers of granulovacuolar degeneration (GVD), such as CHMP2B and CK-1δ, were investigated. This comprehensive approach enabled an efficient assessment of the expression and distribution of multiple proteins that are commonly associated with neurodegenerative diseases.
The findings revealed significantly higher neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) stages in patients with BD, along with argyrophilic grain pathology. Both are related to tau proteins that accumulate in brain cells and are commonly associated with aging. These findings replicated a greater burden of tau-related pathology in BD, as suggested by previous postmortem brain and neuroimaging studies, possibly linked to the age of onset.
More importantly, the presence of CHMP2B-positive GVD in the paraventricular thalamus in about half of the BD cases was an observation not previously reported.
Together, these insights highlight the potential role of neurodegenerative protein accumulation and dysfunctional paraventricular thalamus in the underlying biology of BD.
Overall, the findings add to a growing body of evidence that suggests that BD is a brain-based disease. By uncovering specific protein pathologies, such as CHMP2B-positive GVD, and tau accumulation in key brain regions, the research strengthens the biological understanding of BD beyond simply clinical symptoms.
As the understanding of underlying brain changes improves, there is a growing need for early detection, personalized treatment strategies, and therapies that address the root mechanisms.
“Our study, by demonstrating the presence of CHMP2B-positive GVD in the paraventricular thalamus and increased NFT stages in patients with BD, may pave the way for the development of new diagnostic tools and targeted therapies,” concludes Prof. Kato.
Source:
Journal reference:
Nagakura, A., et al. (2025). Increased granulovacuolar degeneration in the thalamus and higher neurofibrillary tangle Braak stages in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13891