Category: 2. World

  • Modi to visit China for SCO summit on 31st – Newspaper

    Modi to visit China for SCO summit on 31st – Newspaper

    NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit China later in August, his security chief said on Tuesday during talks with Beijing’s foreign minister in New Delhi.

    Modi will attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit opening on August 31 in Tianjin, his first visit to China since 2018, Ajit Doval said in public comments at the start of a meeting with Beijing’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

    “Our prime minister will be visiting for the SCO summit,” Doval said, speaking of “new energy” in diplomatic ties. Wang said China “attaches great importance” to Modi’s visit to the SCO summit, according to an official translator.

    “History and reality prove once again that a healthy and stable China-India relationship serves the fundamental and long-term interests of both of our countries,” Wang added.

    Beijing’s ‘mega dam’ on Yarlung Tsangpo River among points of concern for New Delhi

    The Indian premier said late on Tuesday he was “glad to meet” Wang in New Delhi. “Since my meeting with President Xi (Jinping) in Kazan last year, India-China relations have made steady progress guided by respect for each other’s interests and sensitivities,” Modi said in a post on social media platform X.

    “I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the SCO Summit,” he said.

    “Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity.”

    India also raised concerns with Wang about the construction of a mega-dam on a river that runs through Tibet and India and the effect it could have on downstream states, India’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

    “The need for utmost transparency in this regard was strongly underlined,” it said.

    Beijing approved the project in December on the river — known as Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet and Brahmaputra in India — linking it to China’s carbon neutrality targets and economic goals in the Tibet region.

    Once built, the dam could dwarf the record-breaking Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River in central China – and have a potentially serious impact on millions of people downstream in India and Bangladesh.

    India and China, the world’s two most populous nations, are intense rivals competing for influence across South Asia and fought a deadly border clash in 2020.

    India is also part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, Australia and Japan, which is seen as a counter to China. However, caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump’s tariff war, they have moved to mend ties.

    Wang said during talks on Monday with Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, India’s foreign minister, the two countries should “view each other as partners and opportunities, rather than adversaries or threats”.

    According to the BBC, the visit to India was “expected to lay the groundwork for Modi’s first visit to China in seven years later this month”.

    It quoted Wang as saying that India and China should view each other as “partners” rather than “adversaries or threats”.

    The rapprochement between the countries comes in the backdrop of India’s worsening bilateral relationship with the US.

    Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25% penalty on Indian imports for buying oil and weapons from Russia, taking total tariffs to 50% – the highest in Asia.

    On Monday, White House Trade Adviser Peter Navarro wrote a piece in The Financial Times, accusing India of “cosying up to both Russia and China”. “India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs,” Navarro wrote.

    Published in Dawn, August 20th, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Trump rules out boots on the ground, but eyes air power in Ukraine deal – World

    Trump rules out boots on the ground, but eyes air power in Ukraine deal – World

    • Flurry of diplomacy sees European leaders descend on White House
    • ‘Coalition of the willing’ discuss ways to press Putin to end invasion
    • Geneva offers to host talks, grant Putin immunity from ICC warrants

    WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending troops, but envisioned extending US air power as Western nations began hashing out security guarantees for Ukraine before any potential summit with Russia.

    Trump, in a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia’s Vladimir Putin in Alaska.

    Trump said President Putin, whom he called in the middle of Monday’s talks, had agreed to meet Zelensky and to accept some form of Western security guarantees for Ukraine against Russia – promises met with extreme caution by Kyiv and European leaders.

    According to three sources familiar with the Trump call, Putin proposed holding the summit with Zelensky in Moscow. One source said Zelensky immediately said no to the Russian capital.

    Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, said that European nations would take the lead by sending troops to secure any settlement, an idea that has been mulled by France and Britain.

    “When it comes to security, they’re willing to put people on the ground,” Trump had said in an interview with Fox News.

    “We’re willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air, because no one has the kind of stuff we have. Really, they don’t,” Trump said.

    He added his “assurance” that no US ground troops would deploy to Ukraine, and he again categorically ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance NATO.

    Trump has sided with Putin in describing Kyiv’s NATO aspirations as a cause for the war, in which tens of thousands of people have died.

    European leaders, Ukraine and Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden called the issue a pretext and pointed to Putin’s statements rejecting the historical legitimacy of Ukraine.

    Allies discuss next steps

    Following the Trump talks, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine’s allies known as the ‘Coalition of the Willing’ for virtual consultations.

    Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to discuss security guarantees and “prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended,” a Downing Street spokesperson said.

    “The leaders also discussed how further pressure, including through sanctions, could be placed on Putin until he showed he was ready to take serious action to end his illegal invasion.”

    Macron, speaking to reporters before leaving Washington, also called for additional sanctions if Putin does not show a willingness for peace.

    Britain’s military chief, Admiral Tony Radakin, will travel to Washington on Tuesday for the talks on reassurances.

    The military chiefs of staff of all NATO’s 32 member countries will also meet by video Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, officials said.

    Geneva offers to host

    Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own interests. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told state television channel Rossiya 24 that any deal must ensure the rights of “Russian-speaking people who live in Ukraine,” another issue cited by Moscow for the offensive launched in February 2022.

    Moscow would surely be seen as a provocative location for a summit, with suggestions it would amount to a surrender by Ukraine.

    Macron told French news channel LCI he wanted the summit to take place in Geneva, a historic venue for peace talks.

    Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said the government would be ready to offer immunity to Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to abuses in the war.

    Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have both said the summit could take place in two weeks.

    Trump also is seeking a three-way summit involving him, while Macron has called for a four-way meeting to involve Europeans who will be vital to Ukraine’s security.

    Published in Dawn, August 20th, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • Israel refuses to budge after Hamas accepts truce proposal – World

    Israel refuses to budge after Hamas accepts truce proposal – World

    • Mediators cautious about ‘breakthrough’ as Tel Aviv sticks to demand for release of all hostages
    • Israeli forces kill at least 45 people in Gaza, Palestinian death toll hits 62,064
    • UN says 265 aid workers slain in this year

    JERUSALEM: A day after Hamas accepted a fresh proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza, and signalled its readiness for a new round of talks aimed at ending nearly two years of war, Israel said it stood firm on its call for the release of all prisoners in any future Gaza ceasefire deal.

    Mediators are awaiting an official Israeli response to the plan, with Qatar expressing guarded optimism for the new proposal, noting that it was “almost identical” to an earlier version previously agreed to by Israel.

    But a senior Israeli official told AFP the government’s stance had not changed and demanded the release of all prisoners in any deal.

    The two foes have held on-and-off indirect negotiations throughout the war, resulting in two short truces during which Israeli hostages were released in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, but they have ultimately failed to broker a lasting ceasefire.

    Qatar and Egypt, backed by the United States, have mediated the frequent rounds of shuttle diplomacy.

    Egypt said Monday that it and Qatar had sent the new proposal to Israel, adding “the ball is now in its court”.

    Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said on Tuesday that Hamas had given a “very positive response, and it truly was almost identical to what the Israeli side had previously agreed to”.

    “We cannot make any claims that a breakthrough has been made. But we do believe it is a positive point,” he added.

    Mounting pressure

    According to a report in Egyptian state-linked outlet Al-Qahera News, the latest deal proposes an initial 60-day truce, a partial hostage release, the freeing of some Palestinian prisoners and provisions allowing for the entry of aid.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to publicly comment on the plan, but said last week that his country would accept “an agreement in which all the [prisoners] are released at once and according to our conditions for ending the war”.

    Senior Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi said on social media that his group had “opened the door wide to the possibility of reaching an agreement, but the question remains whether Netanyahu will once again close it, as he has done in the past”.

    Hamas’s acceptance of the proposal came as Netanyahu faced increasing pressure at home and abroad to end the war.

    Over the weekend, tens of thousands took to the streets in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv to call for an end to the war and a deal to free the remaining priosners still held in Gaza.

    The new proposal also comes after Israel’s security cabinet approved plans to conquer Gaza City, fanning fears the new offensive will worsen the already catastrophic humanitarian crisis in the devastated territory.

    45 killed

    Meanwhile, at least 45 people were killed by Israeli strikes and fire across the territory, the local civil defence agency reported on Tuesday.

    A spokesman said the situation was “very dangerous and unbearable” in the Zeitoun and Sabra neighbourhoods of Gaza City, where he said “artillery shelling continues intermittently”.

    The Israeli military declined to comment on specific troop movements, but later claimed that a strike in Khan Yunis overnight targeted a Hamas militant.

    Sabra resident Hussein al-Dairi, 44, said “tanks are firing shells and mortars, and drones are firing bullets and missiles” in the neighbourhood.

    “We heard on the news that Hamas had agreed to a truce, but the occupation is escalating the war against us, the civilians,” he added.

    Israel’s campaign in Gaza has claimed the lives of at least 62,064 Palestinians so far, most of them civilians.

    383 aid workers killed

    A record 383 aid workers were killed last year, the United Nations said Tuesday, branding the figures and lack of accountability a “shameful indictment” of international apathy, and warning that this year’s toll was equally grim.

    The 2024 figure was up 31 per cent on the year before, the UN said on World Humanitarian Day, “driven by the relentless conflicts in Gaza, where 181 humanitarian workers were killed, and in Sudan, where 60 lost their lives”.

    It said state actors were the most common perpetrators of the killings last year, and most of the victims were local staff attacked in the line of duty or in their homes.

    Besides those killed, 308 aid workers were wounded, 125 kidnapped and 45 detained.

    “Humanitarians must be respected and protected. They can never be targeted,” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a statement.

    “This rule is non-negotiable and is binding on all parties to conflict, always and everywhere. Yet red lines are crossed with impunity,” he said, calling for perpetrators to be brought to justice.

    Published in Dawn, August 20th, 2025

    Continue Reading

  • How many wars has President Trump ended?

    How many wars has President Trump ended?

    Jake Horton & Nick Beake

    BBC Verify

    BBC US President Donald Trump at a podium with the White House seal on its front and a banner behind him which reads "pursuing peace".BBC

    As President Donald Trump tries to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine war, he has been highlighting his track record in peace negotiations since starting his second term in office.

    Speaking at the White House on 18 August, where he was pressed by European leaders to push for a ceasefire, he claimed: “I’ve ended six wars… all of these deals I made without even the mention of the word ‘ceasefire’.”

    The following day the number he cited had risen to “seven wars”.

    The Trump administration says a Nobel Peace Prize is “well past time” for the “peacemaker-in-chief”, and has listed the “wars” he has supposedly ended.

    Some lasted just days – although they were the result of long-standing tensions – and it is unclear whether some of the peace deals will last.

    Trump also used the word “ceasefire” a number of times when talking about them on his Truth Social platform.

    BBC Verify has taken a closer look at these conflicts and how much credit the president can take for ending them.

    Israel and Iran

    The 12-day conflict began when Israel hit targets in Iran on 13 June.

    Trump confirmed that he had been informed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ahead of the strikes.

    The US carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites – a move widely seen as bringing the conflict towards a swift close.

    On 23 June, Trump posted: “Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World.”

    After the hostilities ended, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei insisted his country had secured a “decisive victory” and did not mention a ceasefire.

    Israel has since suggested it could strike Iran again to counter new threats.

    “There is no agreement on a permanent peace or on how to monitor Iran’s nuclear programme going forward,” argues Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank.

    “So what we have is more of a de facto ceasefire than an end to war, but I’d give him some credit, as the weakening of Iran by Israel – with US help – has been strategically significant.”

    AFP via Getty Images Iranian workers amid the debris of a building targeted in Israeli attacks in Tehran, Iran, on August 16, 2025. AFP via Getty Images

    Targets in Iran and Israel were hit during 12 days of conflict

    Pakistan and India

    Tensions between these two nuclear-armed countries have existed for years, but in May hostilities broke out following an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir.

    After four days of strikes, Trump posted that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE”.

    He said this was the result of “a long night of talks mediated by the United States”.

    Pakistan thanked Trump and later recommended him for the Nobel Peace Prize, citing his “decisive diplomatic intervention”.

    India, however, played down talk of US involvement: “The talks regarding cessation of military action were held directly between India and Pakistan under the existing channels established between both militaries,” Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said.

    Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo

    Long-standing hostilities between these two countries flared up after the M23 rebel group seized mineral-rich territory in eastern DR Congo earlier in the year.

    In June, the two countries signed a peace agreement in Washington aimed at ending decades of conflict. Trump said it would help increase trade between them and the US.

    The text called for “respect for the ceasefire” agreed between Rwanda and DRC in August 2024.

    Getty M23 rebels guard a unit of surrendering Congolese police officers who will be recruited into the rebel group on February 22, 2025 in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.Getty

    M23 rebels have been linked to Rwanda

    Since the latest deal, both sides have accused each other of violating the ceasefire and the M23 rebels – which the UK and US have linked to Rwanda – have threatened to walk away from peace talks.

    “There’s still fighting between Congo and Rwanda – so that ceasefire has never really held,” says Margaret MacMillan, a professor of history who taught at the University of Oxford.

    Thailand and Cambodia

    On 26 July, Trump posted on Truth Social saying: “I am calling the Acting Prime Minister of Thailand, right now, to likewise request a Ceasefire, and END to the War, which is currently raging.”

    A couple of days later, the two countries agreed to an “immediate and unconditional ceasefire” after less than a week of fighting at the border.

    Malaysia held the peace talks, but President Trump threatened to stop separate negotiations on reducing US tariffs (taxes on imports) unless Thailand and Cambodia stopped fighting.

    Both are heavily dependent on exports to the US.

    On 7 August, Thailand and Cambodia reached an agreement aimed at reducing tensions along their shared border.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan

    The leaders of both countries said Trump should receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in securing a peace deal, which was announced at the White House on 8 August.

    “I think he gets good credit here – the Oval Office signing ceremony may have pushed the parties to peace,” says Mr O’Hanlon.

    In March, the two governments had said they were ready to end their nearly 40-year conflict centred on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    The most recent, serious outbreak of fighting was in September 2023 when Azerbaijan seized the enclave (where many ethnic Armenians lived).

    Getty US President Donald Trump joins hands with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan during a signing ceremony in the State Dining Room of the White House on August 8, 2025 in Washington, DC. Getty

    In August Trump hosted the Azerbaijani president and Armenian prime minister at the White House

    Egypt and Ethiopia

    There was no “war” here for the president to end, but there have long been tensions over a dam on the River Nile.

    Ethiopia’s Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam was completed this summer with Egypt arguing that the water it gets from the Nile could be affected.

    After 12 years of disagreement, Egypt’s foreign minister said on 29 June that talks with Ethiopia had ground to a halt.

    Trump said: “If I were Egypt, I’d want the water in the Nile.” He promised that the US was going to resolve the issue very quickly.

    Egypt welcomed Trump’s words, but Ethiopian officials said they risked inflaming tensions.

    No formal deal has been reached between Egypt and Ethiopia to resolve their differences.

    Serbia and Kosovo

    On 27 June, Trump claimed to have prevented an outbreak of hostilities between them, saying: “Serbia, Kosovo was going to go at it, going to be a big war. I said you go at it, there’s no trade with the United States. They said, well, maybe we won’t go at it.”

    The two countries have long been in dispute – a legacy of the Balkan wars of the 1990s – with tensions rising in recent years.

    “Serbia and Kosovo haven’t been fighting or firing at each other, so it’s not a war to end,” Prof MacMillan told us.

    The White House pointed us towards Trump’s diplomatic efforts in his first term.

    The two countries signed economic normalisation agreements in the Oval Office with the president in 2020, but they were not at war at the time.

    Additional reporting by Peter Mwai, Shruti Menon and Eve Webster.

    The BBC Verify banner.

    Continue Reading

  • Australia news live: Lehrmann defamation case appeal begins at federal court; NSW SES on flood watch | Australia news

    Australia news live: Lehrmann defamation case appeal begins at federal court; NSW SES on flood watch | Australia news

    Bruce Lehrmann appeal begins

    Nino Bucci

    Bruce Lehrmann’s appeal against the federal court ruling that he was not defamed by Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson has started.

    The appeal against that finding will be heard over three days before the federal court’s full court of justices, Michael Wigney, Craig Colvin and Wendy Abraham.

    Share

    Updated at 

    Key events

    Daryl Maguire sentenced to 10 months in jail for misleading Icac

    Former NSW Liberal MP Daryl Maguire has been sentenced to 10 months in jail after he was found guilty of misleading a corruption inquiry in June.

    Daryl Maguire in Sydney in June. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP

    The former member for Wagga Wagga, who had a secret relationship with former NSW premier Gladys Berejiklian, initially gave evidence to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac) during a hearing in July 2018. At the time, he denied knowing he would benefit from a $48m property development deal.

    Magistrate Clare Farnan said:

    The misleading evidence was given deliberately while Mr Maguire was the sitting member of parliament … he has not demonstrated any remorse and maintains his innocence. A significant sentence is required to deter others who might give misleading evidence to the Icac.

    A term of imprisonment is required.

    Farnan said Maguire would serve five months of the sentence without parole. His legal team said it would appeal the sentence.

    Share

    Updated at 


    Continue Reading

  • White House launches TikTok account with Trump saying 'I am your voice' – Reuters

    1. White House launches TikTok account with Trump saying ‘I am your voice’  Reuters
    2. Chinese Officials Say They Won’t Sell TikTok’s Algorithm to US  Social Media Today
    3. White House belies need for TikTok shutdown: China Daily editorial  China Daily – Global Edition
    4. The White House is on TikTok now, which is technically banned in the US  TechCrunch
    5. Why China Is Dunking On The Trump Administration’s New TikTok Account  Forbes

    Continue Reading

  • The US military vets helping Afghans fight deportation

    The US military vets helping Afghans fight deportation

    Regan Morris

    BBC News in San Diego, California

    BBC Monique stares at the camera, wearing a black baseball cap that says US Army, and an olive-green t-shirt. In the background is a fluorescent hallway and a man in a gret t-shirt and the same black army cap. Several ICE officers, masked and in black hoodies, are also in the hallwayBBC

    Monique Labarre is part of the Battle Buddies, a group of army vets who show support for Afghan refugees at immigration hearings

    As a journalist in Afghanistan, Abdul says he helped promote American values like democracy and freedom. That work, he said, resulted in him being tortured by the Taliban after the US withdrew from the country in 2021.

    Now he’s in California applying for political asylum, amid the looming threat of deportation.

    “We trusted those values,” he said. “We came here for safety, and we don’t have it, unfortunately.”

    But when Abdul walked into a San Diego court to plead his case, he wasn’t alone.

    Ten veterans showed up for his hearing – unarmed, but dressed in hats and shirts to signify their military credentials as a “show of force”, said Shawn VanDiver, a US Navy vet who founded ‘Battle Buddies’ to support Afghan refugees facing deportation.

    “Masked agents of the federal government are snatching up our friends, people who took life in our name and have done nothing wrong,” he said.

    Approximately 200,000 Afghans relocated to the US after Kabul fell to the Taliban in August 2021, as the US left the country in chaos after two decades fighting the war on terror.

    Many say they quickly felt embraced by Americans, who recognised the sacrifices they had made to help the US military and fight for human rights.

    But since the Trump administration has terminated many of the programmes which protected them from deportation, Afghans now fear they will be deported and returned to their home country, which is now controlled by the Taliban.

    Mr VanDiver, who also founded #AfghanEvac in 2021 to help allies escape the Taliban when the US withdrew, said US military veterans owe it to their wartime allies to try and protect them from being swept up in President Trump’s immigration raids.

    “This is wrong.”

    The Battle Buddies say they have a moral and legal obligation to stand and support Afghans. They now have more than 900 veteran volunteers across the country.

    Many of the federal agents working for ICE and the Department of Homeland Security are veterans themselves, he said, and the Battle Buddies think their presence alone might help deter agents from detaining a wartime ally.

    “Remember, don’t fight ICE,” Mr VanDiver told his fellow Battle Buddies outside court before Abdul’s hearing, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE.

    “If somebody does fight ICE, capture it on video. Those are the two rules.”

    As Abdul and his lawyer went into court, the veterans stood in the corridor outside in a quiet and tense faceoff with half a dozen masked federal agents. It was the same hallway where an Afghan man, Sayed Naser, a translator who says he worked for the US military, was detained 12 June.

    “This individual was an important part of our Company commitment to provide the best possible service for our clients, who were the United States Military in Afghanistan,” says one employment document submitted as part of Naser’s asylum application and reviewed by the BBC’s news partner in the US, CBS News.

    “I have all the documents,” Mr Naser told the agents as he was handcuffed and taken away, which a bystander captured on video. “I worked with the US military. Just tell them.”

    Mr Naser has been in detention since that day, fighting for political asylum from behind bars.

    Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told the BBC that there is nothing in his immigration records “indicating that he assisted the US government in any capacity”.

    Whichever way Mr Naser’s case is decided, his detention is what inspired veterans to form the Battle Buddies. They say abandoning their wartime allies will hurt US national security because the US will struggle to recruit allies in the future.

    “It’s short sighted to think we can do this and not lose our credibility,” said Monique Labarre, a US Army veteran who showed up for Abdul’s hearing. “These people are vetted. They put themselves at substantial risk by supporting the US government.”

    EPA A large crowd of people waving papers in front of a line of men with guns.EPA

    Afghans attempting to flee the country in August 2021 gathered outside Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul

    President Trump has repeatedly blamed President Biden for a “disgraceful” and “humiliating” retreat from the country.

    But the US’s withdrawal from Afghanistan was initially brokered by President Trump during his first term.

    In their wake, American troops left behind a power vacuum that was swiftly and easily filled by the Taliban, who took control of the capital city, Kabul, in August 2021. Afghans, many who worked with the US military and NGOs, frantically swarmed the airport, desperate to get on flights along with thousands of US citizens.

    Over the ensuing years, almost 200,000 Afghans would relocate to the US – some under special programmes designed for those most at risk of Taliban retribution.

    The Trump administration has since ended this programme, called Operation Enduring Welcome. It also ended the temporary protections which shielded some Afghans, as well as asylum seekers from several other countries, from deportation because of security concerns back home.

    “Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilising economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement about terminating Temporary Protected Status for Afghans.

    She added that some Afghans brought in under these programmes “have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security”.

    Afghans in the United States scoff at the suggestion that they’d be safe going back, saying their lives would be in danger.

    “I couldn’t work,” said Sofia, an Afghan woman living in Virginia. “My daughters couldn’t go to school.”

    With the removal of temporary protected status, the Trump administration could deport people back to Afghanistan. Although that is so far rare, some Afghans have already begun to be deported to third countries, including Panama and Costa Rica.

    Sofia and other members of her family were among the thousands of Afghans who received emails in April from the Department of Homeland Security saying: “It is time for you to leave the United States.”

    The email, which was sent to people with a variety of different kinds of visas, said their parole would expire in 7 days.

    Sofia panicked. Where would she go? She did not leave the United States, and her asylum case is still pending. But the letter sent shockwaves of fear throughout the Afghan community.

    When asked about protecting Afghan wartime allies on 30 July, President Trump said: “We know the good ones and we know the ones that maybe aren’t so good, you know some came over that aren’t so good. And we’re going to take care of those people – the ones that did a job.”

    Advocates have urged the Trump administration to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led government.

    Advocates are hopeful that Naser will soon be released. They say he passed a “credible fear” screening while in detention, which can allow him to pursue political asylum because he fears persecution or torture if returned to Afghanistan.

    The Battle Buddies say they plan to keep showing up for wartime allies at court. It’s not clear if their presence made a difference at Abdul’s hearing – but he wasn’t detained and is now a step closer to the political asylum he says he was promised.

    “It’s a relief,” he said outside court while thanking the US veterans for standing with him. But he said he still fears being detained by ICE, and he worries that the US values he believed in, and was tortured for, might be eroded.

    “In Afghanistan, we were scared of the Taliban,” he said. “We have the same feeling here from ICE detention.”

    Continue Reading

  • Bus crash kills dozens of Afghans deported from Iran – DW – 08/20/2025

    Bus crash kills dozens of Afghans deported from Iran – DW – 08/20/2025

    Dozens of Afghans recently deported from Iran were killed on Tuesday after a bus crash in western Afghanistan.

    Citing local authorities, the AFP news agency reported that more than 50 people were killed in the crash.

    What is known about the crash

    Spokesperson for the Herat provincial government, Mohammad Yousuf Saeedi, told AFP that the bus was carrying Afghans who had been deported from Iran and had been heading to Kabul.

    Police said the bus first collided with a motorcycle and then hit the truck, which had been carrying fuel, before bursting into flames.

    “All the passengers were migrants who had boarded the vehicle in Islam Qala,” said Saeedi, referring to a border crossing point.

    Taliban chief spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid confirmed to German news agency dpa that the victims had been deported from Iran, but said further details were not immediately available.

    A large number of Afghans — who fled decades of war and humanitarian crises — have returned from Iran in recent months, following pressure from Tehran to force millions of Afghan migrants to leave.

    According to the UN, over 1.2 million Afghans have returned or have been forced to return from Iran and Pakistan this year alone.

    Edited by: John Silk

    Continue Reading

  • Trump says he has ended seven wars. The reality isn’t so clear cut – NBC Los Angeles

    Trump says he has ended seven wars. The reality isn’t so clear cut – NBC Los Angeles

    President Donald Trump has projected himself as a peacemaker since returning to the White House in January, touting his efforts to end global conflicts.

    In meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders Monday, Trump repeated that he has been instrumental in stopping multiple wars but didn’t specify which.

    “I’ve done six wars, I’ve ended six wars, Trump said in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy. He later added: “If you look at the six deals I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn’t do any ceasefires.”

    He raised that figure Tuesday, telling “Fox & Friends” that “we ended seven wars.”

    But although Trump helped mediate relations among many of these nations, experts say his impact isn’t as clear cut as he claims.

    Here’s a closer look at the conflicts.

    Israel and Iran

    Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war.

    Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran’s nuclear program and military leadership in June, saying it wanted to stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon — which Tehran has denied it was trying to do.

    Trump negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just after directing American warplanes to strike Iran’s Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. He publicly harangued both countries into maintaining the ceasefire.

    Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University’s McCain Institute, said Trump should get credit for ending the war.

    “There’s always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another,” she said. “And it didn’t have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum.”

    Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a “temporary respite” from the ongoing “day-to-day cold war” between the two foes that often involves flare-ups.

    President Donald Trump said on social media that Iran and Israel had agreed to a total ceasefire.

    Egypt and Ethiopia

    This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts — which don’t directly involve the U.S. — have stalled.

    The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete, with an inauguration set for September.

    Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan, meanwhile, fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams.

    During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt but couldn’t get them to agree. He suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on Truth Social that he helped the “fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now.” However, the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled.

    “It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war,” said Haas. “I mean, they’re just not.”

    India and Pakistan

    The April killing of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached.

    Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. But India has denied Trump’s claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire.

    Although India has downplayed the Trump administration’s role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting.

    “I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I’m not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war,” Farkas said.

    Serbia and Kosovo

    The White House lists the conflict between these countries as one Trump resolved, but there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump’s second term, nor any significant contribution from Trump this year to improve their relations.

    Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted ever since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries.

    During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between Serbia and Kosovo, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out.

    Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo

    Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he’s hardly alone and the conflict is far from over.

    Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army.

    The Trump administration’s efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, wasn’t directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it couldn’t abide by the terms of an agreement that didn’t involve it.

    The final step to peace was meant to be a separate Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. But with the fighting still raging, Monday’s deadline for the Qatar-led deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Trump this month hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict between the two nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a “significant milestone,” and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing “a miracle.”

    The two countries signed agreements intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty’s text was initialed by the countries’ foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicates preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan’s military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region.

    In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since.

    Cambodia and Thailand

    Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer’s brief border conflict.

    Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics.

    Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had.

    According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, “President Trump’s decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did.” ___ Associated Press reporters Jon Gambrell, Grant Peck, Dasha Litvinova, Fay Abuelgasim, Rajesh Roy, and Dusan Stojanovic contributed.

    ___

    Find AP Fact Checks here: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck.

    Continue Reading

  • A look at Gaza ceasefire talks after Hamas accepts a new proposal from Arab mediators

    A look at Gaza ceasefire talks after Hamas accepts a new proposal from Arab mediators


    LONDON: In Gaza’s overwhelmed hospitals, doctors, nurses and other medical staff are battling against what many fear could be their most insurmountable challenge in nearly two years of Israel’s war on the territory’s people — hunger.


    “We go to work sometimes without eating and we treat patients while actually feeling dizzy, lightheaded and weak,” said Dr. Mohammed Abu Mughaisib, a physician working in the territory. “The starvation is not just hitting families in Gaza it’s hitting the health workers too.”


    Gaza’s health sector has been decimated by Israel’s devastating military assault. Hospitals have been bombed, doctors killed and detained, and medical supplies cut off.


    Beleaguered and bloodied, health care workers are now locked in a daily struggle against hunger and malnutrition affecting people across the entire territory.


    If the medical staff cannot eat and are not strong enough to perform the painstaking work needed to treat a battered and malnourished population, the situation can only deteriorate.


    In accounts provided to Arab News from medical charities, hospital workers have described their daily struggles to find enough food to sustain them through their long shifts and feed their families.


    They describe colleagues fainting at work, struggling to continue their lifesaving care for those bombed, starved and shot at as they try to reach the meagre food supplies making it into the territory.


    Abu Mughaisib, who is the deputy medical coordinator for Medecins Sans Frontieres in Gaza, said that despite the decades of conflict affecting the territory, he never imagined such a situation.


    He said most days he and his colleagues eat only one basic meal of bread with canned food or lentils.


    Some days the market is completely empty, and there are never any vegetables, fruit, or meat.


    “Honestly, we don’t have options,” he said, almost anticipating that those outside of Gaza would not believe him.



    “In the hospitals there is no food for the medical staff. Some health workers faint during their shift. They clean the wounds, they deliver babies, and perform surgeries on empty stomachs.


    “Some of my colleagues started to lose weight rapidly. Some of them cannot produce milk to breastfeed their babies. This is not just burnout this is real physical starvation.”


    Dr. Saeed Salah, medical director of the Patient’s Friends Benevolent Society Hospital in northern Gaza, described the food shortages as the “greatest crisis” his colleagues and patients have faced.


    “Some members of our medical staff themselves are malnourished and can no longer sustain the energy needed to perform their duties,” he said, in response to Arab News questions passed through the charity Medical Aid for Palestinians.


    “Our emergency ward is overwhelmed with people who haven’t eaten for days and are in urgent need of IV fluids. In over 21 months of operating under crisis, we’ve never seen days like these.”


    Summer Al-Jamal, a finance and admin assistant for MAP based at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza, described the situation there as “deeply distressing.”



    The hospital has been inundated with victims from shooting attacks on Palestinians gathered at aid distribution hubs nearby, as well as patients injured from Israeli bombings, or who are sick.


    Increasingly, they have been treating malnourished families and their children.


    “The hospital is heavily burdened with departments overwhelmed by trauma cases and critically injured patients,” she said after a recent visit to the facility. “The scale of suffering and the intensity of the emergency were unlike anything I had witnessed before.


    FASTFACTS


    • Two of three famine thresholds have been reached in Gaza, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification platform.


    • Hunger cases crowd Gaza’s overwhelmed hospitals, 94 percent of which are damaged or destroyed, the WHO said.


    “The medical staff appear exhausted, physically and emotionally. Many looked pale, fatigued, and undernourished. The toll of the past weeks had left them drained.”


    After Israel launched its latest Gaza campaign in response to the Hamas-led attack in October 2023, the territory’s health service soon came under fire.


    Casualties surged into hospitals, and the facilities also became targets for Israeli airstrikes. Nearly two years into the conflict, the health service is broken.



    Of the 36 hospitals in the territory before Israel’s current war on Gaza, only 18 remain partially operational, and less than 40 percent of primary health care facilities are still functional, according to the World Health Organization.


    All the facilities have been damaged and are flooded with patients far beyond their maximum operating capacities.


    Gaza’s Health Ministry says Israeli forces have killed more than 1,500 Palestinian health workers since October 2023, with the WHO recording at least 700 attacks on health care facilities in the territory. 


    Doctors and hospital staff have been detained, and more than 10,000 critically ill patients need to be evacuated.


    And then there is the dwindling medical supplies. Israel imposed a complete 11-week blockade on Gaza in March, leading to desperate shortages of medicines and equipment for hospitals, along with basic food for the entire population.



    The main UN agency distributing aid was forced to stop operating and was eventually replaced by the US- and Israeli-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Some supplies have resumed but at a fraction of what aid agencies say is required.


    The dire situation for the health sector was further exacerbated by the sharp increase in casualties last month as Israel ramped up its campaign in the face of an international outcry and widespread accusations of genocide. 


    The WHO reported 13,500 injuries in Gaza in July — the highest since the first three months of Israel’s war on the territory. Many of these took place when Israeli troops repeatedly opened fire on crowds of Palestinians as they waited to collect food from GHF distribution points.


    This section contains relevant reference points, placed in (Opinion field)


    Amid all the carnage, the shortage of food means Gaza’s people are now dying from starvation. 


    Late last month, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative that analyses food security, warned that the “worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.” The body said there would be “widespread death” without immediate action.


    The Gaza Health Ministry said on Monday that 263 Palestinians had died of malnutrition and starvation, including 112 children, since the war started.



    Images of emaciated children being treated at hospitals have shocked the global community in recent weeks.


    Israeli officials have claimed the numbers are inflated and that the children died from pre-existing health conditions. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dismissed reports of severe hunger as Hamas “lies” and insisted last week there is “no policy of starvation.”


    His claims are at odds with those of doctors working in the territory, who have seen a surge in severe malnutrition cases.


    Rowida Sabbah, MAP’s nutrition program lead in southern Gaza, described a recent case of a mother and her two children, aged 5 and 7, who had not eaten any bread for two months. 


    “For two days she had only been able to give them just water,” Sabbah said. The mother finally reached a medical hub for help. “She was crying when she received the supplies,” she said. 



    “Every time I see children suffering from severe hunger and wasting away, my heart breaks. They beg for anything … even just a slice of bread with a pinch of salt. That’s all they hope for.” 


    For medical staff, the food shortages have pushed them to breaking point. Accounts given to Arab News describe the daily battle to source the most meagre of supplies, and desperate searches for small quantities of flour now selling at vastly inflated prices.


    “Even health workers, already stretched to their physical and mental limits, are working long hours on little food, growing weaker as shortages persist,” Dr. Rik Peeperkorn, the WHO representative for the occupied Palestinian territory, told Arab News.


    “No one can sustain this, yet they keep showing up because patients have no one else. We call for large-scale aid, including diverse and nutritious food, to be allowed via all routes.”


    Support for Gaza’s medical teams has also come from more than 100 fellow health workers around the world who have spent time working in the territory during the conflict.



    Last week they signed a letter expressing solidarity with their Palestinian colleagues as they are “starved and shot by Israel” as part of a “methodical attack” of the health system.


    “Doctors, nurses, and first responders are all rapidly losing weight due to forced starvation at the hands of the Israeli government,” the letter stated. 


    “Many suffer from hunger, dizziness and fainting episodes while performing operations and triaging patients in emergency rooms. Most have been displaced into tents after being forced from their homes, and many are surviving on less than a single serving of rice a day.” 


    The letter called for the immediate release of detained health workers, an end to attacks on medical facilities, and the lifting of Israel’s blockade of humanitarian supplies.


    With little sign of progress on a ceasefire and Israel’s ramping up of military operations around Gaza City, doctors in the territory are bracing for things to get even worse.



    Yet despite their hardship, they are working to provide the best treatment possible to a people brutalized by Israel’s war.


    “We are also facing a severe shortage of therapeutic infant formula,” Salah at the PFBS hospital said, focusing on the immediate challenges.


    “Mothers are dehydrated and unable to breastfeed, and pregnant women are suffering complications and are at increased risk of miscarriage. Malnourished patients are deteriorating.


    “Without urgent intervention, more lives will be lost.”



     

    Continue Reading