Blog

  • Giant dinosaur skulls reveal unique hunting strategies

    Giant dinosaur skulls reveal unique hunting strategies

    Not all meat-eating dinosaurs used the same tricks to bring down their prey. While they may look similar – big skulls, sharp teeth, and a terrifying presence – their bite strategies were very different.

    In a new study, scientists at the University of Bristol analyzed 18 species of theropod dinosaurs that lived throughout the Mesozoic Era.


    These two-legged predators include some of the most famous names in dinosaur history: Tyrannosaurus rex, Giganotosaurus, and Spinosaurus. Despite their similar appearances, the way they hunted was far more varied than previously assumed.

    “The feeding strategies of these top predators are more complex than we thought in the past,” said Fion Waisum Ma of the Beipiao Pterosaur Museum of China.

    Blade-like teeth for slicing

    To understand how these dinosaurs hunted, the researchers used 3D scans of fossilized skulls. They applied engineering methods that are normally used to test how bridges handle stress. The goal was to investigate how force traveled through the skull bones during a bite.

    The researchers found that Giganotosaurus had an elongated skull lined with blade-like teeth designed more for slicing than smashing. Instead of crushing bone, it likely hunted by tearing large chunks of flesh from its prey.

    Giganotosaurus’ thin, serrated teeth were “like a cross between a great white shark and a Komodo dragon,” said Eric Snively, associate professor of anatomy at Oklahoma State University.

    Giganotosaurus lived in what’s now South America during the mid-Cretaceous period. It was one of the largest carnivorous dinosaurs ever discovered, possibly even rivaling T. rex in size. Some scientists believe it may have hunted large sauropods, possibly even in coordinated groups – though that part is still debated.

    A dinosaur built for water

    Spinosaurus, on the other hand, had a very different lifestyle. Its teeth were conical and not built for slicing or crushing. Its long, narrow snout and retracted nostrils suggest it spent much of its time in or near water.

    Spinosaurus was “like a fin-backed heron with the body of a wiener dog, and teeth like a crocodile,” said Snively.

    These features point to a diet focused on aquatic prey. It likely snatched up massive fish and other water-dwelling animals, using its jaws more like a fishing spear than a typical predator’s bite.

    Its body also supported this role: a long, possibly paddle-shaped tail, short hind limbs, and a sail-like structure on its back. Spinosaurus didn’t dominate on land the way T. rex or Giganotosaurus might have – but in its river systems, it was probably unmatched.

    The ultimate skull smasher

    T. rex, though, was a different kind of predator, with a bite that wasn’t just powerful – it was extreme, thanks to its shorter, thicker skull and strong jaw muscles that allowed it to bite down with incredible force.

    “It turns out, tyrannosaurs were biting so hard they were actually stressing their skulls more than we expected,” said Snively.

    By comparing the skull structure and muscle attachment points with modern relatives like crocodiles and birds, the researchers discovered that T. rex had one of the most intense bites of any land predator in history.

    Survival in a competitive world

    There may be a reason behind T. rex’s brutal efficiency. It wasn’t just about being big or strong – it was about surviving in a world packed with danger and competition.

    T-Rex lived later during the Late Cretaceous Period, when hunting was highly competitive,” Ma said. That environment, she added, may have pushed it to develop a “unique feeding strategy.”

    This may explain why T. rex evolved such an overbuilt skull and one of the most powerful bites ever recorded in a land animal. It needed to kill fast, defend kills from rivals, and even crush through bone to reach the nutrients inside.

    Unlike earlier theropods that relied more on speed or slashing, T. rex was built to finish the job. In an ecosystem where hesitation could mean losing a meal – or becoming one – T. rex didn’t just survive. It took control.

    Dinosaur skulls and hunting strategies

    The study makes one thing clear: just because these dinosaurs shared a body plan doesn’t mean they hunted the same way.

    Some had teeth designed for slicing or crushing, while others were adapted for hunting in water. “Their behavior shouldn’t be thought of as ‘one size fits all,’” said Snively.

    This diversity makes sense considering that these predators lived in different eras and environments, hunting various kinds of prey. Each dinosaur evolved to fit its unique surroundings – and their skulls still reveal that story.

    The full study was published in the journal Current Biology.

    —–

    Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

    Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

    —–

    Continue Reading

  • Battlefield 6 Director Explains Portal Changes And Other New Features

    Everyone and their mums seem to be enjoying the Battlefield 6 open beta at the moment, but there’s still a lot about the upcoming shooter that EA has held back from revealing. GAMINGbible recently sat down with Criterion Games to discuss the upcoming multiplayer shooter, why the series is going back to modern day, and to break down the new and upgraded features the game will be getting.

    Fasahat Salim is the Design Director for Criterion Games, one of the four developers working underneath the Electronic Arts’ Battlefield Studios banner. For Battlefield 6, the studios wanted a return to form for the series, bringing back the traditional classes and expanded destruction physics to reel in fans of the older games.

    “It’s the biggest Battlefield, and we don’t take that lightly,” Salim told GAMINGbible. “The key for us is to not necessarily be bigger for the sake of being bigger. It’s about taking all of the things we know that represent Battlefield at the foundation of what we’ve been doing for as long as we’ve been doing it.

    “So, looking back at those games and all the things we know that worked and resonated with the community; taking those elements that are Battlefield, taking them to the next level, and asking ourselves ‘How do we take things like destruction and classes to the next level?’”

    In terms of which Battlefield games were looked at the most for inspiration, Salim cites the popularity of Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4 as the reason to return to a modern setting.

    “That was our North Star, we wanted to hit that modern feeling, but that doesn’t mean we didn’t strip it all down and look at the stuff that worked in some of the other Battlefield games. That boiled down to destruction, large-scale maps, focusing on classes, and allowing players to fulfil that fantasy of whatever class they are playing as.”

    Battlefield Studios is made up of four developers: DICE, Criterion, Ripple Effect and Motive Studio. For a project on this scale, and with so many hands involved in spreading the load across all aspects of the game, effective communication and collaboration techniques are crucial.

    “It’s been really useful for the way we’ve built this game,” Salim said. “When we say this is the biggest Battlefield, we mean it. It’s not just singleplayer and multiplayer, there’s Battlefield Portal and a lot more. So, it only made sense to get as much talent into Battlefield Studios as possible, and that’s how we set it up.

    So, how do we go about doing that? One of the big things was that there are a lot of skills spread across these studios, so being able to lean on them for disciplines and expertise for anything we don’t have in-house is really valuable. It allows us to get that momentum in the content that we’re building, and not necessarily be shackled by the fact we don’t have that in our own studio. And the same goes for the other studios to lean on Criterion for any support. So, all that sharing is something that spreads across the whole game.”

    It’s no secret that the previous game in the series, Battlefield 2042, was met with a mixed reception from the community when it launched back in 2021. The four class system was replaced with a brand new specialist system, something that proved to be unpopular with players. The maps were also heavily criticised for being too big, not providing much cover, and overall just not being as interesting as the maps that populated earlier games in the series.

    As I covered in my preview of the beta last week, Battlefield 6’s maps feel closer to the feel of those that appeared in Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4. Like those games, there’s a strong sense of map flow, they’re more suitable for all different playstyles, and the destruction system is a lot more emphasised.

    “Maps are the bread and butter of what we do. The massive large-scale environments are still there, but there are a few things that are slightly different. Destruction is one of the obvious ones. Destruction being at the scale of what it is, but more importantly, it being a tool where players can now engage with it through tactical opportunities and make choices they couldn’t before. That’s very much part of the experience, where it’s more of a strategic tool rather than just something that looks cool.

    “That’s one thing, and the other thing is we’ve made a strong effort not only worrying about the large-scale map we’re building but also focusing on the micro zones within it. We call them Combat Zones, and the idea is that we don’t want the maps to just be a location that we drop a whole bunch of game modes into, but we want each of these levels and the spaces within them to play well with whatever game mode you’re engaging with.

    “So you can drop into a Team Deathmatch in a smaller map, and while it’s located within a much larger map that we’ve built, that space in particular has been built to accommodate those smaller game modes in addition to the larger ones.”

    Salim doesn’t necessarily see Battlefield 6 as a way of “righting the wrongs” of 2042, but he does reckon “there were a lot of learnings to be made from that game, and I think there’s a lot of things we’ve actually built on top of 2042. I think it’s more about not looking at a single game, but looking at the collection of Battlefield we’ve done in the past and picking out the throughline of what works about the series at its core.”

    As for what features specific to 2042 made it over to Battlefield 6, Salim went on to tease a little more about what the new version of Portal looks like. For the unaware, Battlefield Portal was essentially a tool in Battlefield 2042 which allowed you to create custom rules in your own Battlefield servers, using content from previous games. The feature returns in Battlefield 6, but Salim calls it “more of a platform than anything else.”

    “It’s a massive, massive upgrade on what was done before. It’s not going to be limited to you just being able to create custom game modes and using assets from previous Battlefield games. Of course, you can still do that if you want to, but the key thing for Portal now is it’s not a full blown expression of what people want to create. We have a spatial editor, so people can actually create environments, move assets around, and ultimately customise what they want that experience to be.

    “They can then go about scripting things. We’ve got a scripting editor in there, so you can choreograph experiences and AI to do whatever you want. This time around it’s more than just creating offshoots of what was already there, and you’ll actually be able to create brand new experiences.”

    In terms of what these could be, Salim teased “top down 2D shooters” and “horde modes” as potential new experiences that can be had in the new Battlefield Portal. It sounds like it goes way beyond that though, and that players may even be able to create narrative experiences and venture into genres outside of shooters.

    “That feeds into one of the key things we have been focusing on with this project, which is how can we give players the tools to express themselves? Portal is just one way of doing that, but that also applies to loadouts and classes, and destruction as well. These aren’t just things to engage with, but also a way for you to express yourself.”

    As we moved on to discuss the Battlefield 6 classes; Assault, Recon, Support, and Engineer, Salim walked me through how each of these classes are different or similar to their iterations from earlier games.

    “The key for us was that we fulfil the fantasy of filling those roles. I’m an engineer, I’ve always loved playing engineer. My fantasy as an engineer main is that I want to be the anti-vehicle guy, so I know how to get the most out of my experience. We know there’s a huge appetite for people to work with the loadouts that resonate with those classes, so they feel like they can fulfil that fantasy.

    “But it was also important for us to evolve that. That meant listening to player feedback and especially using the Battlefield Labs program as a way to find the sweet spot and give players more creative agency. We want players to express themselves with the weapons they use, so irrespective of what class you pick, you can still change your weapons outside of the traditional loadouts related to those classes.

    “I think this has been a really interesting evolution of how we feel about classes. You still get to fulfil that traditional Battlefield fantasy, but agency and creativity has been a big part of this process as well.”

    Players have now had a chance to check out Battlefield 6 through its first open beta weekend, which began on Thursday and runs until the end of today. Another beta weekend will follow next week, between 14th August and 17th August.

    From the looks of it, it seems that the open beta has probably become one of the most successful betas to date, accruing over half a million concurrent players during its first few days alone. It’ll be interesting to see if this is enough to convince players to pick up the full game when it launches later this year.

    Battlefield 6 releases on 10th October, 2025 for PC, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X/S.

    Continue Reading

  • Why the new Pixel Watch 4 charger has me excited, and worried

    Why the new Pixel Watch 4 charger has me excited, and worried

    The Pixel Watch 4 is set to introduce a brand new charger – the third one in four generations of Google’s smartwatch – and while it really seems like the pros outweigh the cons here, I’m dreading a couple of small things.


    This issue of 9to5Google Weekender is a part of 9to5Google’s rebooted newsletter that highlights the biggest Google stories with added commentary and other tidbits. Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox early!


    To summarize what’s coming, the Pixel Watch 4 is getting a new “Quick Charge Dock.” This new charger is still pin-based, but sits on the side of the watch instead of underneath, leaving the smartwatch to rest on its side whenever it is being charged.

    There are good and bad things here.

    Advertisement – scroll for more content

    First and foremost, this new system is apparently much faster. Per a recent leak, the Pixel Watch 4’s “Quick Charge Dock” is 25% faster. That’s a big step up from what was already pretty quick, and it’s certainly good motivation to move to a new system. Beyond that, this new charging dock is probably a bit less prone to issues. As I mentioned in a previous post, the new location for the pins will probably see less build-up from sweat which would probably make charging that little-bit-more reliable than it is today. If you’ve ever worn the Pixel Watch 2 or 3 on a humid, sweaty day and tried to charge it without cleaning it first, you might know what I’m talking about there, as that can occasionally lead to the charger not reliably charging the watch.

    This new design also eliminates any confusion in charger alignment. While it’s pretty easy to get used to the existing charger – especially if you just remember that the button should align with the cable – it’s also totally understandable that people can get the alignment wrong and try to charge their watch only for it to not sit correctly.

    There are definitely a lot of potential downsides, though.

    As previously mentioned, the exposed pins on the side of the watch may very well be an eyesore, and they’ll also be exposed to more opportunities for damage. The new location also presents a problem for accessories like cases, which won’t be able to carry over from prior generations, assuming they work at all.

    Then, there’s just the fact that Pixel Watch owners are going to be left swapping out their chargers entirely, and I think that’s going to happen to a lot of fans.

    The original Pixel Watch was good, but the Pixel Watch 2’s upgrades were so major, it nearly necessitated an upgrade. That means that anyone who owned both has already experienced two chargers. If they decide to get a Pixel Watch 4 this year, that’s a third new system. And let’s continue with that idea. If someone had a Pixel Watch 2 and didn’t upgrade last year, they still benefited from a growing number of charging accessories that have popped up on the market, and may have amassed a number of spare chargers or perhaps even a dock for their watch and phone. Google’s new charger makes that all worthless.

    On top of that, the way this charger is designed, it’s very possible that the two Pixel Watch 4 sizes won’t be able to use the same dock. I really hope that’s not the case, but it’s a possibility!

    Personally, one thing I’m not looking forward to is that, if I have a Pixel Watch 4 but my wife sticks with her Pixel Watch 3, we can no longer share a charger while travelling. It’s been nice not having to worry about a second charger as she charges hers as needed and wears it to bed, and then mine sits on the charger overnight. But if the two watches use different systems, that goes out the window – and is not even to mention that the new charger looks bulkier.

    So, while I’m overall looking forward to the benefits of this new charger, I’m also dreading some of the downsides – and also interested to see the reaction from existing Pixel Watch owners who upgrade.

    Google, realistically, needs to pick a system and stick with it. This new side-mounted setup doesn’t feel like it has staying power. I think that there will be a lot of negative reactions to the pins on the side alone, beyond the fact that this new design is pretty restrictive to what Google can do with the hardware going forward. But, either way, Google needs to stop making these drastic changes. As we’ve discussed on Pixelated in the past, one thing Apple has going for it with the Apple Watch is that, while speeds may differ, you can use the same charger from 2016’s original Apple Watch all the way up to the current generation of the smartwatch, and it’ll still work.

    What do you think?


    This Week’s Top Stories

    Did you really think a week would go by without more Pixel leaks?

    Another week, another deluge of Pixel leaks!

    Google also dropped some video teasers of the Pixel 10 Pro.

    Samsung confirms Android 16 rollout details

    After launching the update with its Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Flip 7 last month, Samsung has been quiet regarding rollout plans for the One UI 8 update, its Android 16 upgrade. This week, the company finally announced an expansion of the beta program to more devices, as well as confirming rollout plans that begin in September.

    More Top Stories


    From the rest of 9to5

    9to5Mac: OpenAI officially announces GPT-5, its next major upgrade to ChatGPT

    9to5Toys: New Burton Goods leather organizer case – the most gorgeous way to tame your tech accessories

    Electrek: Tesla used car prices keep plumetting, dips below average used car


    Follow Ben: Twitter/X, Threads, Bluesky, and Instagram

    FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


    Continue Reading

  • The Hundred 2025 results: Rehan Ahmed stars as Rockets edge Superchargers & Brave hammer Phoenix

    The Hundred 2025 results: Rehan Ahmed stars as Rockets edge Superchargers & Brave hammer Phoenix

    England’s Rehan Ahmed produced an all-round performance as Trent Rockets beat Northern Superchargers by five wickets to maintain their unbeaten start in the men’s Hundred.

    The 20-year-old collected 2-23 as the Superchargers were restricted to 124-9, before scoring 31 (26) as the Rockets completed their chase with four balls to spare.

    The hosts had looked in control of a routine chase with Tom Banton (37) and Joe Root (20) sharing a 57-run opening stand.

    However, they came unstuck against the Superchargers’ spinners, Imad Wasim (3-19) removing both openers in quick succession before Adil Rashid had Max Holden caught in the deep for a laborious 8 (11).

    With 41 needed from the final 30 balls, Ahmed and Tom Alsop smacked 31 off 15 for the fourth wicket and while the pair were removed by Rashid and Wasim, respectively, Marcus Stoinis and Adam Hose saw the Rockets safely over the line.

    Earlier, Northern Superchargers slumped to 18-3 inside the powerplay, Akeal Hosein striking twice in three balls to remove openers Dawid Malan and Zak Crawley before Michael Pepper slashed a routine catch to Root.

    Dan Lawrence became the fourth member of the Superchargers’ top five to depart without reaching double figures when he was bowled by Ahmed.

    Captain Harry Brook, who top-scored with 45 (30), and Graham Clark (36 off 22) looked to have dragged their side back into the match with a 56-run fifth-wicket stand but when Stoinis removed Brook and Wasim with consecutive deliveries, their innings faltered.

    They slipped from 90-4 to 110-9, with Ahmed, Cook, and Lockie Ferguson, sharing the final three wickets to fall, and needed a four-ball cameo from Mohammad Amir (11) to get beyond 120.

    Continue Reading

  • GTA 6 Official Release Date Update Is Upsetting Fans

    GTA 6 Official Release Date Update Leaves Gamers Torn

    You would think this is good news, but no

    A recent update regarding Grand Theft Auto VI’s release date from publisher Take-Two Interactive has upset the fanbase, and it’s easy to see why.

    Earlier this week, on August 7, Take-Two Interactive held its Q1 2026 earnings call.

    These earnings calls are just a way for publishers to offer updates to their investors, and naturally, most of Take-Two’s investors were only interested in Grand Theft Auto VI news.

    Thankfully, Take-Two did offer an update on Rockstar Games’ upcoming title… and the fans aren’t feeling too great about it.

    As revealed in the earnings call (per Yahoo Finance), Grand Theft Auto VI is still on track for its May 26, 2026, which sounds like great news, right?

    Well, no, according to the majority of the commenters over on the r/GTA6 subreddit, because they’ve heard this all before.

    “Take2 dosent know s**t tho the meeting before R* delayed the game they said the game will be released this fall”, commented user ByteSpawn.

    “Even R* themselves didn’t know till is close to release date.”

    “Honestly, I’d only start to think May 26 is set in stone if it gets confirmed at the Feb 26 earnings call”, replied user ScottRans0m.

    “If it’s getting delayed again they’d have to announce it around then.”

    Yeah, it’s kind of hard to argue with them on this one.

    Take-Two’s earnings calls aren’t for consumers, they’re for investors. The information in them isn’t meant to inform us or hype us up; it’s supposed to put their investors at ease.

    And, the commenters are also right in the sense that Take-Two did state in a previous earnings call that GTA VI was still on track… just before Rockstar Games announced that it would be delayed.

    Ultimately, their statement is a little bit pointless. They’re not going to announce that it’s been delayed further in an earnings call. If the game is still on track, we’ll likely only know for sure once 2026 finally rolls around.

    Featured Image Credit: Rockstar Games

    Topics: GTA 6, GTA, Grand Theft Auto, Take-Two, Rockstar Games

    Continue Reading

  • Stock-market rebound to be tested by inflation reports as stagflation threat emerges – MarketWatch

    1. Stock-market rebound to be tested by inflation reports as stagflation threat emerges  MarketWatch
    2. Does CPI Reflect True Inflation? Some on Wall Street Have Doubts.  Barron’s
    3. Inflation data takes the spotlight next week on Wall Street  CNBC
    4. The week ahead: CPI crosswinds, tech’s 30x orbit, and the Alaska handshake that could shake the trees  FXStreet
    5. Wall street outlook: 5 factors that could shape the week ahead  TradingView

    Continue Reading

  • Stock-market rebound to be tested by inflation reports as stagflation threat emerges

    Stock-market rebound to be tested by inflation reports as stagflation threat emerges

    By Christine Idzelis

    Upcoming inflation data could ‘deliver a reality check to the market,’ says Charles Schwab’s Kevin Gordon

    Investors are watching for signs of inflation from tariffs.

    Markets are facing a crucial reading on U.S. inflation in the coming week, soon after regaining their footing following volatility triggered by a weak jobs report at the start of August.

    Investors will be watching closely for any evidence of prices rising in the economy due to tariffs, with data from the consumer-price index due out Aug. 12. Some worry that a “stagflationary trend” risks taking hold, which involves both inflation and the unemployment rate picking up, according to Kevin Gordon, senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab.

    Hotter-than-expected inflation could “deliver a reality check to the market,” potentially causing stocks to stumble from their recent rebound in the U.S., Gordon said in a phone interview.

    The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite COMP closed Friday at a fresh record peak, while the S&P 500 SPX finished just shy of its all-time high, according to Dow Jones Market Data. That’s after the S&P 500 saw on Aug. 1 its biggest drop since April, on a surprisingly soft U.S. employment report for July that included big revisions lower for jobs growth in previous months.

    “The surprise nature of the July jobs report” puts more focus on the upcoming inflation print from the consumer-price index for that same month – particularly as concern about the potential for tariffs to increase already elevated inflation has kept the Federal Reserve from lowering interest rates, according to Gordon.

    A hot inflation reading from the CPI data would put the Fed in a “tougher spot,” at a time when the market is expecting rate cuts in September because of the softening labor market, he said.

    The Fed, which is monitoring risks to its dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability, has an inflation target of 2%.

    “Higher tariffs have begun to show through more clearly to prices of some goods, but their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remain to be seen,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in remarks at a press conference on July 30. “A reasonable base case is that the effects on inflation could be short-lived-reflecting a one-time shift in the price level,” he said. “But it is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent.”

    The federal-funds-futures market indicated on Friday an 89.1% chance that the Fed will cut its benchmark rate in September by a quarter percentage point from the current range of 4.25% to 4.5%, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, at last check. Traders were pricing in two or three rate cuts by yearend. At a bankers’ conference in Colorado on Saturday, Fed governor Michelle Bowman heightened her push for cutting interest rates over the Federal Reserve’s three remaining meetings this year.

    Despite concerns over recent deterioration in the labor market, the unemployment rate remains historically low even with its slight increase in July to 4.2%, and the U.S. economy expanded in the second quarter.

    ‘Animal spirits’

    Resilient corporate earnings, big investments announced by companies and expected rate cuts should all be helpful for the economy and equity market, said Alexis Deladerrière, co-deputy chief investment officer for the fundamental equity business at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, in a phone interview.

    “We are beginning to see the return of animal spirits in the equity market,” he said, pointing to a pick up in mergers and acquisitions and increased volume in initial public offerings. The acceleration is M&A is “a sign of confidence from business leaders” about their outlook, he said.

    The U.S. stock market has roared back from its low in April, a trough hit after President Donald Trump announced “liberation day” tariffs. The tariffs had sparked confusion in markets as the large levies upended the system of global trade, raising questions about where they would settle after negotiations and what their impact may be on growth and inflation.

    Read: Apple’s stock gains as new announcement with Trump could help its tariff problem

    But today there’s more certainty around “the new rules of the game,” said Deladerrière. “We are now in a situation where not everything is clear, but enough is clear for businesses” to make decisions around hiring, investing and repositioning their supply chains to help protect their profit margins, he explained.

    Still, the full impact of tariffs on inflation is too early to tell, as they’ve just started to be implemented, according to Deladerrière. Their effect will depend in part on whether companies decide to absorb the tariffs or pass them along to their customers; businesses may also choose to relocate some of their production to the U.S. to mitigate their cost, he said.

    There are some early signs that tariffs are increasing prices in the U.S., including in areas such as toys and furniture and sporting goods, according to George Catrambone, head of fixed income for the Americas at DWS.

    “That tick higher in inflation is coming from the goods side,” while inflation on the services side of the economy is much more “subdued” after easing since the pandemic, he said. “You have to look closer at the interplay between goods and services and then arrive at a more holistic picture as to whether or not disinflationary forces are in place, or we’re going to reaccelerate because of the tariffs.”

    Investors will also get reading on wholesale inflation in the U.S. in the upcoming week, with data from the producer-price index scheduled to be released on Aug. 14.

    While there’s signs that growth in the U.S. economy is slowing, Catrambone wouldn’t expect to see” long-lasting” stagflation should inflation accelerate in the near-term.

    Read: ‘The stagflation theme in markets is intensifying’: What investors need to know

    “You may see it for a three-month period, six-month period max,” Catrambone said of stagflation. The Fed may keep rates restrictive if inflation were a problem due to tariffs, while a weakening labor market would help bring prices down as it would cool demand, he explained.

    In the bond market, the yield on 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y ended Friday at 4.282%, not far above where it had landed after its steep drop on Aug. 1 – the day investors digested the July jobs report, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

    As investors watch for data on inflation and economic growth, Jitania Kandhari, deputy CIO of solutions and multi-asset group at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, said by phone that she’s been “rebalancing out of the U.S. into international markets.”

    Kandhari said that she’s not “outright bearish because earnings have kept up,” but that a slowdown may be ahead in the second half of the year while other parts of the world, like Europe, look compelling because of their fiscal and monetary policies. She described her overall portfolio as “slightly underweight the U.S.”

    The U.S. stock market closed higher Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite all booking weekly gains. That left the S&P 500 up 8.6% so far this year, according to FactSet data.

    -Christine Idzelis

    This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

    (END) Dow Jones Newswires

    08-10-25 1200ET

    Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

    Continue Reading

  • One week until Man Utd v Arsenal in the Premier League

    One week until Man Utd v Arsenal in the Premier League

    General admission tickets for the meeting are now sold out, but we’ll have plenty of exclusive content available for you before and after the game on MUTV, in the United App and on ManUtd.com, with live commentary available across those platforms during 90 minutes, so you don’t need to miss a second of the action!

    As the newest man through the door, all eyes will be on Benjamin Sesko and whether he’ll be ready to receive his United debut, his transfer from RB Leipzig having only been announced just over a week prior to the referee’s first whistle.

    Arsenal’s visit may also provide competitive debuts for fellow new signings Bryan Mbeumo, Matheus Cunha and Diego Leon, the trio having already had a taste of United life in pre-season.

    Continue Reading

  • Hedge Funds Shift Bets on Oil and Solar Stocks in Energy Reversal

    Hedge Funds Shift Bets on Oil and Solar Stocks in Energy Reversal

    Hedge funds are betting against oil stocks and winding back shorts on solar in a reversal of positions that dominated their energy strategies over the past four years.

    Since the beginning of October and through the second quarter, equity-focused hedge funds have — on average — been mostly short oil stocks, according to a Bloomberg Green analysis of positions on companies in global indexes for sectors spanning oil, wind, solar and electric vehicles. That’s a reversal of bets that had dominated since 2021, according to the data, which are based on fund disclosures to Hazeltree, an alternative-investment data specialist.

    Continue Reading

  • CRKT Michael Walker Blade Lock: folding knife with positive lock system that keeps the blade locked in the open and closed positions

    CRKT Michael Walker Blade Lock: folding knife with positive lock system that keeps the blade locked in the open and closed positions

    The knife we present here is a collaboration between Colombia River Knife & Tools and Michael Walker, one of the most influential master knifemakers of the last half century. He has more than twenty patents on blade locking systems to his credit (including the very popular liner lock) and on this model, called Blade Lock, he proposes a positive mechanism that keeps the blade locked in the open and closed positions.

    The Walker Blade Lock system works both  both in the open and closed positions and requires a deliberate and firm press to unlock it. It is extremely solid and prevents unintentional opening.

    Michael Walker is one of the historic names in international cutlery design. Born in 1949 in New Mexico, Michael has been designing knives since 1975. In the space of 50 years, he has revolutionised the world of custom and industrial knifemaking, both with his intricate custom “Zipper” (multi-piece blade) knives and by inventing and perfecting over twenty blade-locking systems, most notably the liner-lock, in 1981. Although the system had been applied before, Walker codified it and made it easily industrialisable, allowing it to be applied to mass-produced knives. Michael Walker has been a voting member of the American Knifemakers Guild since 1985 and was inducted into the Cutlery Hall of Fame of the American Blade magazine in 2004.

    The CRKT Blade Lock echoes the typical aesthetics of Michael Walker’s custom folders, characterised by complex – sometimes intricate – and meticulously detailed lines, and in this case dominated by the contrast between the rounded lines of the cogwheels surrounding the pivot and the multi-layered G10 scales featuring a squared checkering. The cogwheel teeth are also echoed on the heel and back of the blade, giving the knife a very charming “steampunk” style, reminiscent of clockwork mechanisms from the Victorian era. Also original is the system for fixing the G10 scales to the stainless steel plates, which is done by means of a row of four Torx grub screws at the front plus one at the back. Overall, each scale is secured by five screws.

    The scales are made of two-tone G10 with an effective checkering that is pleasant to the touch and to the eye. The clip is made of stainless steel.

    The Blade Lock’s locking system is ingenious in its simplicity: what appears to be a simple thumbstud on the back of the blade actually operated a spring-loaded tab which, when pressed, allows the knife to be deployed and then closed again, acting as on any thumb pin-opening knife. The system requires little trial and error to master and proved to be very smooth and precise, as one would expect from a Walker design, even if operating the thumbstud requires some force. On the other hand, it is an effective locking system, and it is good to know that it does not disengage without a firm press.

    The blade of the CRKT Walker Blade Lock has a sheepsfoot profile with a plain edge and is made of 14C28N stainless steel with a length of 74.30 mm and a thickness of 3.45 mm. 14C28N is a martensitic chrome stainless steel developed by Alleima (formerly Sandvik) specifically for professional cutlery applications. Among its features are excellent edge retention, good corrosion resistance and easy resharpening. The finish is satin, and the markings are inconspicuous and sharply made, as one would expect from a gentleman’s knife – effective but not flashy.

    There is a lot of metal in this knife, and in the end you can feel it, because the CRKT Blade Lock stops the  scale needle at 116 grams, which in the pocket you feel a bit. To help carrying, the Walker Blade Lock is fitted with a classic, non-reversible stainless steel clip that allows tip-up carrying, i.e. with the blade tip pointing upwards.

    The crafmanship and centering of the various partes is impeccable and a credit to the designer’s name. The level of CRKT manufactured in China has always been rather high, and the examination of this umpteenth model confirms this. As far as the packaging is concerned, we find the CRKT standard respected, with a cardboard box printed in green containing the knife in a plastic bag and a leaflet with some tips for using the knife.

    Michael Walker (left) was a guest at the Italian Knifemakers Guild Show in Milan. He is pictured with Master and Italian Knifemakers Guild President Fabrizio Silvestrelli.

    Do we really want to find fault with it? Precisely because of the particular blade lock system, which is completely asymmetrical, it is not suitable for use by left-handed users. In any case, forget about using the CRKT Blade Lock for spins, evolutions and tricks to impress your friends. The weight, the force required by the mechanism and the proportions make it unsuitable for this purpose; it is a knife, not a spinning top, and this is obvious. Even users with extra-large hands might have some difficulty in handling it, because it is rather small, but for everyone else the Walker Blade Lock will certainly be a great source of satisfaction. Last but not least, it is an excellent “conversation piece”, perfect for sparking endless discussions between knife enthusiasts. The retail price is $94, but if you look around you can find it for a few bucks less. In any case, this is a fair price for a really well-made, original knife with a very elaborate look. We – as you may have guessed – really liked it.

    To find out more please visit the CRKT website.


    CRKT Walker Blade Lock technical specifications and price

    Manufacturer

    CRKT

    Model:

    Walker Blade Lock

    Designer:

    Michael Walker

    Type:

    Folding knife

    Bocking Mechanism:

    Blade-lock

    Blade Material:

    14C28N stainless steel 

    Finish:

    Satin

    Blade Length:

    74.3 mm

    Blade Thickness:

    3.45 mm

    Overall Length:

    176 mm

    Handle:

    G10

    Blade Edge:

    Plain

    Weight:

    116 g

    Price (MSRP in the US):

    $94

    Continue Reading