Qaasid News

Download Our App

Category: 3. Business

  • ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 Trial: First-Line Sacituzumab Govitecan Plus Pembrolizumab Improves Outcomes in PD-L1–Positive Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 Trial: First-Line Sacituzumab Govitecan Plus Pembrolizumab Improves Outcomes in PD-L1–Positive Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    The phase 3 ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 trial, published in The New England Journal of Medicine in January 2026, provides compelling evidence that combining the Trop-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with previously untreated, PD-L1–positive, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study represents a pivotal step forward in first-line treatment for one of the most aggressive and therapeutically challenging breast cancer subtypes.

    ASCENT-04

    Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Symptoms ,Causes, Types, Diagnosis and​ Treatment

    Clinical Context: The Unmet Need in First-Line TNBC

    Triple-negative breast cancer is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression and is associated with early relapse, visceral metastases, and poor long-term survival. Although immune checkpoint inhibition combined with chemotherapy has become the standard first-line approach for PD-L1–positive metastatic TNBC, outcomes remain suboptimal, and nearly half of patients do not proceed beyond first-line therapy. Improving the depth and durability of response early in the disease course remains a major clinical priority.

    Trial Design and Treatment Strategy

    ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 was a randomized, open-label, international phase 3 trial conducted across 186 sites in 28 countries. A total of 443 patients with previously untreated advanced TNBC and PD-L1–positive tumors (combined positive score ≥10) were randomly assigned to receive either sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or investigator’s choice chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab.

    Sacituzumab govitecan was administered at 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, combined with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The control arm consisted of standard chemotherapy regimens (taxane-based or gemcitabine–carboplatin) plus pembrolizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review.

    Efficacy: Meaningful Improvement in Progression-Free Survival

    The trial met its primary end point, demonstrating a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab. Median progression-free survival was 11.2 months in the experimental arm compared with 7.8 months in the chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab arm, corresponding to a 35% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death.

    This near-one-year median progression-free survival compares favorably with outcomes from prior pivotal trials of chemotherapy–immunotherapy combinations in this setting, where median progression-free survival has generally ranged between 7 and 10 months. Importantly, the progression-free survival benefit was consistent across predefined subgroups, including patients with aggressive disease features such as liver metastases and early relapse after curative-intent therapy.

    Response Depth and Durability

    Objective response rates were numerically higher with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab (60%) than with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (53%). More notably, responses were substantially more durable. Among patients achieving a confirmed response, the median duration of response was 16.5 months in the sacituzumab-based arm, compared with 9.2 months in the chemotherapy arm.

    These findings suggest that antibody–drug conjugate–based strategies may provide more sustained tumor control than conventional chemotherapy, even when initial response rates are similar. The durability of response is particularly relevant in metastatic TNBC, where early loss of disease control often limits long-term benefit.

    Overall Survival

    At the time of the primary analysis, overall survival data were immature, with approximately one quarter of patients having died. Median overall survival had not yet been reached in either treatment arm. Interpretation of future overall survival outcomes will need to account for the high rate of crossover to sacituzumab govitecan among patients initially assigned to chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab.

    Safety and Treatment Tolerability

    The safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab was consistent with the known toxicities of each agent. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred at similar frequencies in both arms. However, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was substantially lower in the sacituzumab-based arm (12%) compared with the chemotherapy arm (31%).

    The most common adverse events with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab included diarrhea, nausea, and neutropenia, while chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab was more frequently associated with anemia and thrombocytopenia. Importantly, immune-mediated adverse events were less frequent in the sacituzumab-based combination. These findings suggest that improved tolerability and lower discontinuation rates may allow patients to remain on effective therapy longer, potentially contributing to improved clinical benefit.

    Biological and Therapeutic Implications

    Sacituzumab govitecan delivers the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 directly to Trop-2–expressing tumor cells through a hydrolyzable linker, enabling high intratumoral drug exposure. While sacituzumab govitecan is not considered intrinsically immunomodulatory, emerging evidence suggests that antibody–drug conjugates may enhance antitumor immune responses when combined with checkpoint inhibition, providing a biologic rationale for this combination.

    The results of ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 support the concept of moving effective antibody–drug conjugates earlier in the treatment paradigm, not merely as salvage therapy but as foundational components of first-line treatment.

    You Can Read All Article Here


    Continue Reading

  • Libya signs 20-bln-USD oil agreement with French, U.S. companies-Xinhua

    TRIPOLI, Jan. 24 (Xinhua) — Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah announced on Saturday the signing of an oil agreement with two foreign companies, with the investments exceeding 20 billion U.S. dollars.

    In a post published on his official Facebook page, Dbeibah said that Libya signed a development agreement for a period of 25 years with TotalEnergies of France and the U.S. company ConocoPhillips.

    He said that the agreement aims to increase the production capacity of the Libyan Waha Oil Company by up to 850,000 barrels per day, with net revenues expected to exceed 376 billion dollars for Libya.

    Dbeibah also announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding with the U.S.-based Chevron, as well as a cooperation memorandum with Egypt’s Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, without providing further details.

    The signing of the agreements and memoranda took place on the sidelines of the fourth edition of the Libya Energy & Economic Summit, which kicked off on Saturday in the capital Tripoli, with participation from international and Libyan companies.

    Oil and gas exports are the primary source of income for Libya, though the sector has faced setbacks in recent years due to domestic conflicts and political instability. ■

    Continue Reading

  • Newmont tops the list of most overbought stocks on Wall Street after gold rally

    Newmont tops the list of most overbought stocks on Wall Street after gold rally

    Continue Reading

  • Enhanced 30 m Impervious Surfaces for China (2020, 2022) via 2 m/30 m Data Fusion

  • Bounoua, L., Nigro, J., Zhang, P., Thome, K. & Lachir, A. Mapping urbanization in the United States from 2001 to 2011. Appl. Geogr. 90, 123–133 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B. Ecological effects of new-type urbanization in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 135, 110239 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, B., Zhang, Y. & Bourke, R. Urbanization impacts on flood risks based on urban growth data and coupled flood models. Nat. Hazards 106, 613–627 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. et al. Mapping local climate zones and its applications at the global scale: A systematic review of the last decade of progress and trend. Urban Clim. 57, 102129 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. et al. Effect of urbanization and urban forests on water quality improvement in the Yangtze River Delta: A case study in Hangzhou, China. J. Environ. Manage. 351, 119980 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, M. C. et al. Interactions between climate change and urbanization will shape the future of biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 436–447 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. et al. Impact of effective impervious surface disconnection on urban hydrographs: A multi-scenario modeling study at the catchment scale. J. Hydrol. 630, 130656 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y. et al. Net greenhouse gas balance in U.S. croplands: How can soils be part of the climate solution? Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17109 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y., Wang, S., Pan, N., Ma, Y. & Liu, W. Growth stage-dependent responses of carbon fixation process of alpine grasslands to climate change over the Tibetan Plateau, China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 291, 108085 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deliry, S. I., Avdan, Z. Y. & Avdan, U. Extracting urban impervious surfaces from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 satellite data for urban planning and environmental management. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 6572–6586 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, D., Shi, X. & Renaud, F. G. Risk assessment for hurricane-induced pluvial flooding in urban areas using a GIS-based multi-criteria approach: A case study of Hurricane Harvey in Houston. USA. Sci. Total Environ. 904, 166891 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. et al. High-resolution multi-temporal mapping of global urban land using Landsat images based on the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sens. Environ. 209, 227–239 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. et al. Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: A POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 103, 7–27 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. et al. GISD30: global 30 m impervious-surface dynamic dataset from 1985 to 2020 using time-series Landsat imagery on the Google Earth Engine platform. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 1831–1856 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, P. et al. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 2607–2654 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, P. et al. Annual maps of global artificial impervious area (GAIA) between 1985 and 2018. Remote Sens. Environ. 236, 111510 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, C., Schmitt, M., Geiß, C., Chen, T.-H. K. & Zhu, X. X. A framework for large-scale mapping of human settlement extent from Sentinel-2 images via fully convolutional neural networks. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 163, 152–170 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, P. et al. Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017. Sci. Bull. 64, 370–373 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanaga, D. et al. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5571936 (2021).

  • Brown, C. F. et al. Dynamic World, Near real-time global 10 m land use land cover mapping. Sci. Data 9, 251 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbane, C. et al. Convolutional neural networks for global human settlements mapping from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Neural Comput. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05449-7 (2020).

  • Li, Z. et al. Breaking the resolution barrier: A low-to-high network for large-scale high-resolution land-cover mapping using low-resolution labels. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 192, 244–267 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, K., He, G., Yin, R., Wang, G. & Long, T. A Comparison of Seven Medium Resolution Impervious Surface Products on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China from a User’s Perspective. Remote Sens. 15, 2366 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, T. G. et al. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG2004 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • You, Y. et al. Building Detection from VHR Remote Sensing Imagery Based on the Morphological Building Index. Remote Sens. 10, 1287 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, D. et al. A Large-Scale Mapping Scheme for Urban Building From Gaofen-2 Images Using Deep Learning and Hierarchical Approach. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 14, 11530–11545 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. ArXiv151203385 Cs http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385 (2015).

  • Peng, X. et al. A higher accuracy forest cover product of China by fusing heterogeneous forest-related datasets using Dempster-Shafer theory. Int. J. Digit. Earth 17, 1–20 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, X. et al. GF-1 WFV satellite images based forest cover mapping in China supported by open land use/cover datasets. Sci. Data 11, 1355 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. et al. A novel weakly-supervised method based on the segment anything model for seamless transition from classification to segmentation: A case study in segmenting latent photovoltaic locations. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation 130, 103929 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. et al. Weakly-semi supervised extraction of rooftop photovoltaics from high-resolution images based on segment anything model and class activation map. Appl. Energy 361, 122964 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. J. et al. The 50-year Landsat collection 2 archive. Sci. Remote Sens. 8, 100103 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4. CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database.

  • Liangyun, L., Xiao, Z., Xidong, C., Yuan, G. & Jun, M. G. L. C. _FCS30-2020:Global Land Cover with Fine Classification System at 30m in 2020. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4280923 (2020).

  • Long, T., He, G., Jiao, W. & Wang, G. A large-region high-resolution satellite dataset of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. China Sci. Data 5, 21.86101.1/csdata.2020.0015.zh (2020).

  • Shannon, C. E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Shlens, J. & Le, Q. V. RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space. ArXiv190913719 Cs http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.13719 (2019).

  • Yin, R. et al. Improved 30-m Impervious Surface Data for China, 2020 and 2022, with Enhanced Spatial Detail through fusing 2-m and 30-m resolution data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15004180 (2025).

Continue Reading

  • Is the supreme court ready to stand up to Trump over Federal Reserve attack? | Federal Reserve

    Is the supreme court ready to stand up to Trump over Federal Reserve attack? | Federal Reserve

    Donald Trump has tried his usual tactics when it comes to getting the US Federal Reserve to lower interest rates: bully when persuasion doesn’t work, and then fire when bullying doesn’t work.

    In an unprecedented assault on the central bank, the president has called the Fed chair, Jerome Powell, “stupid” and threatened to fire him for not cutting interest rates as quickly as Trump would like. Most recently, the justice department instigated a criminal investigation against Powell for testimony he gave about renovations at the Fed’s headquarters. Even so, the Fed has not budged.

    Tactically, Trump’s assault on the Fed appears to be no different than his overhaul of the entire federal government. The president has learned if he pushes hard enough, he can get his way. And he has mostly been successful.

    But with the Fed, it seems that Trump may have met his match. At least as far as the supreme court is concerned. On Wednesday, the court’s justices, in oral arguments, appeared resoundingly skeptical of Trump’s firing of the Fed governor Lisa Cook.

    But while the justices’ skepticism could be interpreted as a sign that the court is checking executive authority, legal experts warn that any ruling against him may not be a harsh check on Trump’s power.

    Instead, the court appears to be carving out a special exception for the Fed at a time when the independence of other government agencies is still under threat.

    “The consequences are potentially very harmful,” said Michael Dorf, a law professor at Cornell University. “The supreme court is making war on independent agencies at the worst possible moment – which is to say at a moment when you have a president who wants to centralize power in himself and wants to appoint people who are there because of their loyalty to him and [who] have no particular expertise.”

    Trump fired Cook in August, alleging that she committed mortgage fraud by listing more than one property as her primary home, a move that would give her a better mortgage rate. The accusations were first posted on social media, and a few days later, Trump removed Cook. The White House made an appeal to the highest court after a lower federal court temporarily reinstated Cook into her role.

    Because Cook’s firing was haphazard, with no investigation or formal hearing about the alleged mortgage fraud, Trump’s case against Cook has opened up a host of questions the court could answer in a ruling. Were Cook’s due-process rights violated because she didn’t receive a hearing? Even if the mortgage allegations are true (Cook’s lawyers say they have evidence it was an “inadvertent mistake”), does mortgage fraud that took place before she was appointed a Fed governor constitute grounds for her removal? Should the case have been decided on by a lower court before reaching the supreme court?

    Making matters even more complicated is the nature of the Fed. The US central bank was created to be a quasi-private, independent government agency that is supposed to be protected from politics. Fed officials can only be fired by the president “for cause”, though the law doesn’t specify what “cause” is.

    Running in the background of the case is a big question, one that could have repercussions for the global economy: how much power will the supreme court allow a president to have over the Fed?

    Typically, constitutional experts look to see how the supreme court has decided similar cases, and Cook’s firing was far from the first test of Trump’s executive powers.

    Last year, Trump fired independent officials, including two Democratic-appointed members of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which oversees unions, and Rebecca Slaughter, the commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which regulates telecommunications and media.

    The supreme court allowed Trump’s firing of the officials to stand, and in Slaughter’s case, constitutional experts anticipate a landmark ruling that will strengthen executive power for decades to come.

    Some within the US conservative legal movement have been advocating for the “unitary executive” theory – the idea that the president should be able to fire any executive branch officers at will. At the heart of this belief is the idea that the votes of the American people should be the only check on the president.

    For conservative justices on the supreme court who support that theory, Trump’s second term has given them the perfect opportunity. Constitutional analysts say that Slaughter’s FTC firing, which is still pending, will allow the court to narrow or even overturn Humphrey’s Executor v United States, a landmark case from 1935 that limited the president’s power to fire executive officials of independent agencies.

    But while conservative justices appear keen to hand the president even more power, there seems to be a single exception: the Fed.

    The supreme court even mentioned the central bank when it allowed Trump’s NLRB firings to go through, a notable event given that the Fed had nothing to do with the case.

    “The Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States,” the court’s majority wrote at the time.

    Many took this as a signal from the court that, should Trump try to fire an executive within the Fed, the court would resist.

    Legal experts point out that, by law, the Fed’s structure within the federal government is no different than the other quasi-private, independent agencies.

    “The elephant in the room in this oral argument is how come, when it comes to Lisa Cook, suddenly the judges are interested in enforcing the statute [of independence]. Whereas with Rebecca Slaughter … and all these other people he improperly removed, they just conclude the status doesn’t matter. His constitutional authority allows him to remove anybody for any reason. Like, what’s going on here?” said Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School.

    The justices’ rationale seems to be as much economic as legal. Amy Coney Barrett, a member of the 6-3 conservative majority on the court, brought up the fact that “we have amicus briefs from economists who tell us that if Governor Cook is [fired], that it could trigger a recession”.

    “How should we think about the public interest in a case like this?” she asked.

    Brett Kavanaugh, another conservative, asked Trump’s justice department direct questions about the “real-world” importance of Fed independence.

    “Let’s talk about the real-world downstream effects of this, because if this were set as a precedent, it just seems to me – just thinking big picture – what goes around comes around,” Kavanaugh said. “All of the current president’s appointees would likely be removed for cause on January 20, 2029 if there’s Democratic president … so what are we doing here?”

    The power of the Fed comes largely from its ability to set interest rates. High interest rates make borrowing more expensive. It can slow inflation at the risk of increasing unemployment. That Trump wants lower interest rates is not surprising: lower interest rates can give the economy a short-term boost, but at the risk of rising prices later.

    It’s a balancing act that requires looking at the economic data and thinking about what’s best for the long-term stability of the economy, not the political fortunes of whoever is in power. Mess with that independence, and economic shocks such as a recession could be triggered.

    With Trump’s case against Cook, “an unstoppable force has met an immovable object”, Menand said. While a majority of the justices may be fine with cutting down, for example, the FTC’s independence, “it’s a totally different game when it comes to the Federal Reserve”.

    “Large business interests don’t want to see the Federal Reserve’s capacity degraded. They don’t want to see the Federal Reserve politicized,” Menand said.

    To many legal scholars, the supreme court has been very lenient with Trump’s executive power, even beyond the issue of independent agencies. Over the last year, the court has allowed the administration to continue aggressive immigration enforcement tactics and has blocked lower courts from issuing nationwide injunctions that, as in his first term, could block some of his executive actions.

    “One thing that concerns me a little bit is that if the court rules against Trump in the tariffs case, and in Cook, it will have gotten unearned prestige for being unbiased and standing up to Trump,” Dorf said. “You stand up to him at the most extreme edge of what he does, [but] you’re still allowing him to do all sorts of things that, in prior circumstances, we would have said the court ought to stand up to. But they’re not.”

    It’s unclear when the court will release its decision on Cook’s case, though it will probably issue a ruling by June.

    Continue Reading

  • M&A Boom Driven by High AI Valuations and Strategic AI Acquisitions

    M&A Boom Driven by High AI Valuations and Strategic AI Acquisitions

    AI has become one of the key themes underpinning current M&A activity, with AI‑related transactions representing a meaningful share of megadeals, see chart below.

    Note: Data through December 2025. Sources: Bloomberg, Apollo Chief Economist

    Download high-res chart

    This presentation may not be distributed, transmitted or otherwise communicated to others in whole or in part without the express consent of Apollo Global Management, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”).  

    Apollo makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, reasonableness, or completeness of any of the statements made during this presentation, including, but not limited to, statements obtained from third parties. Opinions, estimates and projections constitute the current judgment of the speaker as of the date indicated. They do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Apollo and are subject to change at any time without notice. Apollo does not have any responsibility to update this presentation to account for such changes. There can be no assurance that any trends discussed during this presentation will continue.   

    Statements made throughout this presentation are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice and do not constitute an investment recommendation or investment advice. Investors should make an independent investigation of the information discussed during this presentation, including consulting their tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about such information. Apollo does not act for you and is not responsible for providing you with the protections afforded to its clients. This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any security, product or service, including interest in any investment product or fund or account managed or advised by Apollo. 

    Certain statements made throughout this presentation may be “forward-looking” in nature. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking information. As such, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology including, but not limited to, “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.


    Continue Reading

  • Coca-Cola sues Vue after cinema chain switches to Pepsi | Coca-Cola

    Coca-Cola sues Vue after cinema chain switches to Pepsi | Coca-Cola

    Coca-Cola is taking legal action against Vue after the cinema chain switched to arch-rival PepsiCo as its supplier for soft drinks in Europe.

    Vue, which operates more than 90 cinemas across the UK and Ireland, put the contract up for tender last year.

    In March 2025, the largest privately owned cinema operator in Europe, with 222 sites in eight countries, selected PepsiCo as its exclusive supplier until at least 2030.

    The deal saw the end of a relationship between Vue and Coca-Cola that has lasted for almost 25 years.

    On Thursday, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners Great Britain (CCEP) took legal action against Vue Entertainment to reclaim alleged unpaid debts outstanding when the contract was terminated.

    It is understood Coca-Cola also has outstanding debts payable to Vue, which has not sought legal action relating to the amount.

    Coca-Cola’s legal action has been filed by Coltman Warner Cranston, a Coventry-based law firm that specialises in debt recovery.

    Darren Davoile, who leads the practice, told the Guardian that the company does not comment on client activity.

    Tim Richards, the chief executive and founder of Vue, said: “One would have hoped that after 25 years, a simple phone call could have resolved a genuine dispute for such a small amount without the need for lawyers.”

    Coca-Cola GB did not respond to a request for comment.

    PepsiCo has a portfolio that includes Pepsi Max, Mountain Dew, Lifewtr, Bubly sparkling water and Pure Leaf.

    In 2020, Vue rival Cineworld also announced a deal to move away from Coca-Cola and use PepsiCo as its exclusive soft drink supplier.

    Continue Reading

  • ‘Repatriate the gold’: German economists advise withdrawal from US vaults | Germany

    ‘Repatriate the gold’: German economists advise withdrawal from US vaults | Germany

    Germany is facing calls to withdraw its billions of euros’ worth of gold from US vaults, spurred on by the shift in transatlantic relations and the unpredictability of Donald Trump.

    Germany holds the world’s second biggest national gold reserves after the US, of which approximately €164bn (£122bn) worth – 1,236 tonnes – is stored in New York.

    Emanuel Mönch, a leading economist and former head of research at Germany’s federal bank, the Bundesbank, called for the gold to be brought home, saying it was too “risky” for it to be kept in the US under the current administration.

    “Given the current geopolitical situation, it seems risky to store so much gold in the US,” he told the financial newspaper Handelsblatt. “In the interest of greater strategic independence from the US, the Bundesbank would therefore be well advised to consider repatriating the gold.”

    Stefan Kornelius, the spokesperson for Friedrich Merz’s coalition government, said recently that withdrawal of the gold reserves was not currently under consideration.

    But Mönch is only the latest in a string of economists and financial experts to argue that such a move would be in keeping with the greater strategic independence that Europe’s largest economy has been seeking from the US in recent months.

    Michael Jäger, the head of the European Taxpayers Association (TAE) as well as the Association of German Taxpayers, has also said Berlin should make its move, arguing that the US’s stated desire to seize Greenland should concentrate minds.

    “Trump is unpredictable and he does everything to generate revenue. That’s why our gold is no longer safe in the Fed’s vaults,” Jäger told the Rheinische Post. “What happens if the Greenland provocation continues? … The risk is increasing that the German Bundesbank will no longer be able to access its gold. Therefore, it should repatriate its reserves.”

    Jäger said he had written last year to the Bundesbank and the finance ministry, urging them to “bring our gold home”.

    Until recently the gold issue has been the preserve mainly of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), which has repeatedly urged the return of the gold for patriotic reasons. But it has increasingly crept into the mainstream discourse.

    Katharina Beck, the finance spokesperson for the opposition Greens in the Bundestag, has also spoken out in favour of relocating the gold bars, calling them an “important anchor of stability and trust”, which “must not become pawns in geopolitical disputes”.

    However, Clemens Fuest, the president of the Institute for Economic Research (Ifo) and one of the country’s most prominent economists, warned against such a move, saying it could lead to unintended consequences and would “only pour oil on the fire of the current situation”, he told the Rheinische Post.

    Germany’s total gold reserves are worth almost €450bn.

    Just over half are held at the Bundesbank in Frankfurt am Main, 37% in the vaults of the US Federal Reserve in New York and 12% at the Bank of England in London, the global centre of gold trading. The Bundesbank says it regularly undertakes an audit of the supplies of gold it holds in storage.

    Speaking last October at the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) autumn meetings in Washington DC, the Bundesbank president, Joachim Nagel, assured attenders there was “no cause for concern” over the German gold held at the US Federal Reserve.

    Frauke Heiligenstadt, the parliamentary group spokesperson on financial policy for the Social Democrats, junior partners in the government, said that while she understood concerns about the gold reserves, there was no need for panic.

    “Germany’s gold reserves are well diversified,” she said. Because half of them are located in Frankfurt, “our ability to act is guaranteed”. Having gold in New York made sense, she added, because “Germany, Europe and the US are closely linked in terms of financial policy”.

    But, amid Trump’s hardening rhetoric towards his western partners, an increasing number of Merz’s Christian Democrats have been speaking out in favour of relocation.

    “Due to the Trump administration, the US is no longer a reliable partner,” Ulrike Neyer, a professor of economics at the University of Düsseldorf, told the Rheinische Post.

    Continue Reading

  • Foreign Ownership Rules and Sector Access in Indonesia

    Foreign Ownership Rules and Sector Access in Indonesia

    Foreign ownership in Indonesia is rarely a binary yes-or-no determination. Most sectors are open to foreign capital in principle, but access is shaped by ownership limits, scale requirements, licensing conditions, or mandatory local participation.

    Related Reading

    For foreign investors, the central question is not whether Indonesia allows foreign investment, but whether a specific business model can operate legally, sustainably, and at the intended scale within the country’s regulatory framework.

    How Indonesia determines foreign access

    Indonesia regulates foreign participation at the level of business activities, not at the level of the investor or the company’s name. Whether a foreign investor may own a company outright, hold a minority position, or must partner with a local entity depends on how the proposed activities are defined and how those activities are treated under national investment policy.

    Find Business Support

    Ownership rules are set centrally but applied through a licensing framework influenced by sector ministries. As a result, access outcomes are structured rather than arbitrary, but they are also not automatic. Participation reflects policy priorities, sector sensitivity, and economic impact rather than purely commercial intent.

    Reading the Positive Investment List in practical terms

    The Positive Investment List functions as a policy filter rather than a definitive permission table.

    It categorizes activities as open, conditionally open, capped, or reserved based on national priorities.

    In practice, the list provides orientation rather than certainty. While it establishes broad eligibility, it does not operate independently from licensing interpretation or sector regulation. Actual access depends on how activities are applied within the licensing system and whether accompanying conditions are met. A sector may appear open on paper while remaining constrained in execution due to ownership caps, investment scale requirements, or sector-specific licensing conditions.

    How foreign participation is structurally restricted

    Foreign participation is shaped through overlapping regulatory mechanisms rather than a single rule. In some activities, foreign ownership is capped at defined levels such as 49 percent or 67 percent, requiring Indonesian participation regardless of investment scale. These caps affect not only equity participation but also control, governance, and the ability to make unilateral decisions.

    In other activities, access is conditioned primarily on scale rather than ownership percentage. Indonesia applies investment plan value thresholds to determine whether certain activities are open to foreign investors. In many sectors, foreign participation is permitted only where the planned total investment value meets or exceeds IDR 10 billion (US$590,000). This threshold is assessed at the project level and is distinct from paid-up capital requirements. As a result, an investment can be legally incorporable but practically inaccessible if its planned scale does not meet policy expectations.

    These mechanisms operate together. Compliance with an ownership cap does not negate scale requirements, and meeting an investment threshold does not override sector-specific licensing conditions. Feasibility must therefore be assessed holistically rather than rule by rule.

    Why business activity definition determines outcomes

    The way a business defines its activities is a structural decision with long-term consequences. Similar commercial models can face materially different ownership outcomes depending on how activities are classified within Indonesia’s regulatory framework.

    Two investors pursuing the same revenue model may receive different ownership treatment if one defines its activities narrowly while the other adopts a broader or differently framed scope. These differences may not prevent incorporation, but they often surface later when additional licenses are required, when activities expand beyond the original scope, or when records are reviewed during audits or regulatory checks.

    Activity definition determines not only initial access but also the durability of that access over time.

    Capital structure and practical market access

    Capital requirements operate on two distinct levels. At incorporation, foreign-owned companies are required to issue and pay up a minimum of IDR 2.5 billion in capital (US$145,000) under statutory company law requirements. This threshold enables legal establishment, but it does not determine whether an activity is accessible in practice.

    Separately, many sectors assess feasibility based on investment plan value rather than equity contributions. Where foreign participation is conditioned on a minimum planned investment of IDR 10 billion (US$590,000), capital may be deployed progressively rather than paid up in full at entry. However, the approved investment plan anchors regulatory expectations. Significant deviations between approved plans and actual deployment can trigger licensing issues or additional scrutiny, affecting both cost and flexibility.

    Capital planning shapes not only entry feasibility but also execution risk and long-term regulatory stability.

    When local partnerships become mandatory

    Local partnerships arise when ownership caps restrict foreign participation beyond defined thresholds. In these cases, joint ventures are regulatory outcomes rather than strategic preferences.

    Mandatory partnerships affect feasibility in several ways. Capped ownership limits influence control over decision-making, pace of execution, and governance structure. They also complicate exit options, as transfers of shares are constrained by ownership rules and regulatory approvals. For investors, the key question is whether the required partnership structure aligns with commercial objectives and long-term risk tolerance, not merely whether a local partner can be identified.

    Areas of interpretation and regulatory exposure

    Not all sector access rules are explicit or uniformly applied. Regulatory interpretation, precedent, and administrative practice influence outcomes, particularly in activities involving hybrid business models or evolving sectors.

    Interpretive exposure is often not visible at entry. It tends to emerge as the business scales adds activities, seeks financing, undergoes restructuring, or prepares for M&A or exit transactions. Where ownership caps or investment thresholds apply, alignment between activity definition, investment classification, and licensing commonly extends approval timelines from several weeks to several months, increasing both cost and execution risk.

    Long-term strategic implications

    Foreign ownership conditions extend beyond initial market entry. They shape scalability, restructuring risk, acquisition options, exit flexibility, and valuation.

    Once ownership structures, activity definitions, and investment classifications are embedded in licensing approvals, later changes are assessed against the original configuration. 

    Assumptions that create structural risk

    Foreign investors often assume that ownership limits can be bypassed through structuring shortcuts, adjusted easily after incorporation, or offset through flexible capital declarations. In practice, ownership and investment rules are enforced structurally rather than informally.

    Find Business Support

    These assumptions rarely fail at entry. They tend to fail when transaction size increases, when external financing is introduced, or when exit and M&A activity is contemplated, at which point earlier design decisions are reassessed under heightened scrutiny.

    Ownership assessment as a feasibility decision

    Foreign ownership analysis belongs at the feasibility stage, before incorporation and capital commitment. Ownership rules and investment thresholds determine whether an investment is structurally viable and whether Indonesia is the right market for a given business model, not merely how to enter it.

    About Us

    ASEAN Briefing is one of five regional publications under the Asia Briefing brand. It is supported by Dezan Shira & Associates, a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm that assists foreign investors throughout Asia, including through offices in Jakarta, Indonesia; Singapore; Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Da Nang in Vietnam; and Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia. Dezan Shira & Associates also maintains offices or has alliance partners assisting foreign investors in China, Hong Kong SAR, Mongolia, Dubai (UAE), Japan, South Korea, Nepal, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Italy, Germany, Bangladesh, Australia, United States, and United Kingdom and Ireland.

    For a complimentary subscription to ASEAN Briefing’s content products, please click here. For support with establishing a business in ASEAN or for assistance in analyzing and entering markets, please contact the firm at asean@dezshira.com or visit our website at www.dezshira.com.

    Continue Reading

  • Asbestos found in children’s play sand sold in UK | Retail industry

    Asbestos found in children’s play sand sold in UK | Retail industry

    Bottles of children’s play sand have been withdrawn from shelves by the craft retailer Hobbycraft after a parent discovered they were contaminated with asbestos.

    The parent, who did not wish to be named, raised the alarm after her children played with the sand at a party.

    She sent samples off to a testing lab, which found traces of asbestos fibres in the bottles of yellow, green and pink sand sold in Hobbycraft’s Giant Box of Craft arts kit.

    Asbestos can cause cancer in later life if inhaled, although the risk to children who played with the sand is thought to be low.

    The discovery came two months after asbestos traces found in similar play sand products in Australia prompted a government recall and the closure of schools and nurseries across the country and in New Zealand.

    All the affected products are manufactured in China, where items containing less than 5% of asbestos can be labelled asbestos-free. UK law says that there is no safe limit for exposure to the mineral.

    The parent said: “The bottles of coloured sand looked extremely similar to ones I had seen on a news report of play sand recalled in Australia.

    “I was concerned enough to buy a set at Hobbycraft and send it to an accredited lab for testing. Three of the five colours came back positive for fibrous tremolite asbestos.”

    She alerted Hobbycraft, which withdrew the product from sale but declined to issue a recall notice. “I am getting increasingly upset thinking that kids are being exposed unnecessarily,” she said.

    Hobbycraft said that no UK authority had warned of a risk and that there was no evidence of harm to customers.

    However, a spokesperson said: “As a precaution, we have voluntarily removed the product from sale while we carry out independent testing … We will update customers as soon as we are in a position to do so.”

    A government source criticised Hobbycraft’s response. “Parents are right to be concerned by this,” the source said. “Officials are investigating, but there’s no good reason why Hobbycraft shouldn’t recall this themselves, given the evidence.”

    The issue highlights post-Brexit gaps in health and safety law, which leave authorities unable to issue recalls without hard evidence of harm to health.

    The so-called “precautionary principle”, abolished when product safety legislation was redrafted after Brexit, allowed the government to restrict products thought to pose a serious threat to health, without having to acquire scientific evidence.

    Campaigners, including the British Occupational Hygiene Society, have criticised the government for refusing to reinstate powers to withdraw potentially hazardous goods when product safety laws were redrafted last year. Current rules rely on exporting countries to alert authorities to problem products.

    “We know that there is no way that every product landing on British doorsteps can be tested individually for safety and the labels can’t be made to tell the truth, so, it was a missed opportunity for the government,” said Prof Kevin Bampton, CEO of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

    “We do have the precautionary principle for the environment, which means that bats and newts in some ways have better protection than people working in Britain and, potentially, our children.”

    The Department for Business and Trade rejected the claims.

    “We have some of the most robust product safety laws in the world and any product being put on the UK market by businesses must meet our strict criteria,” said a spokesperson.

    According to the British Occupational Hygiene Society, the health risk to children who played with the contaminated sand is likely to be low, as there were only small quantities in the bottles.

    However, Bampton warned that the long-term risks of exposure to asbestos remain little understood. He said: “This issue should be a wake-up call for regulatory change, so governments can be proactive, act fast and protect human health from risks before they protect profit.”

    Continue Reading