Category: 3. Business

  • Perplexity drops advertising as it warns it will hurt trust in AI

    Perplexity drops advertising as it warns it will hurt trust in AI

    Stay informed with free updates

    AI start-up Perplexity has abandoned advertising over fears that it will erode user trust, despite rivals pushing ahead with introducing ads as they seek strategies to make money from the technology.

    San Francisco-based Perplexity was one of the first generative AI companies to introduce ads in 2024, running tests in which sponsored answers were displayed under the chatbot’s answers.

    However, the company — which also offers paid subscriptions — began phasing out the ads late last year. On Tuesday, executives at the company said it had no plans to pursue advertising further.

    “A user needs to believe this is the best possible answer, to keep using the product and be willing to pay for it,” a Perplexity executive said.

    Perplexity’s ads were labelled and the company said they had no bearing on the chatbot’s responses.

    But the executive said in general “the challenge with ads is that a user would just start doubting everything . . . which is why we don’t see it as a fruitful thing to focus on right now”.

    It comes as leading AI groups have followed Perplexity in introducing advertising to start making money from free users and appease investors as they burn through cash to train and sustain the large language models that underpin popular products.

    OpenAI last week began testing advertising on its core product, ChatGPT, for users who do not pay for a subscription. It has a similar model, where labelled ads appear below answers. It has emphasised that ChatGPT’s answers are not influenced by these sponsors.

    Google has advertising in AI mode, as well as in its AI Overviews summaries on traditional search. But the search giant has so far held off introducing ads into its Gemini chatbot.

    In contrast, Anthropic this month committed to keeping its chatbot Claude free from ads.

    Perplexity was also one of the first to introduce shopping features on its platform, followed by Google and OpenAI. Unlike its competitors, however, executives said Perplexity did not make money from this feature or a cut of sales.

    Valued at $18bn, with a reported $200mn in annualised revenues, Perplexity makes the majority of its money from subscriptions. It offers free services, as well as tiers ranging from $20 to $200 a month. It has more than 100mn users, according to executives.

    Ads on Perplexity have been wound down, and executives said it is primarily focused on ensuring answers are accurate.

    “We are in the accuracy business, and the business is giving the truth, the right answers,” said another Perplexity executive. Although it could revisit advertising in the future, the executive said it was “misaligned with what the users want” and it might “never ever need to do ads”.

    Continue Reading

  • Renesas Develops SoC Technologies for Automotive Multi-Domain ECUs Essential for the SDV Era

    Renesas Develops SoC Technologies for Automotive Multi-Domain ECUs Essential for the SDV Era

    • Scalability and functional safety enabled by chiplet technology
    • Auto-grade quality for large, modern AI NPUs
    • Advanced power control for higher performance, improved power efficiency and safety
    • New technology presented at the ISSCC 2026 in San Francisco

    TOKYO, Japan and SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. ― Renesas Electronics Corporation (TSE:6723), a premier supplier of advanced semiconductor solutions, has developed three System-on-Chip (SoC) technologies for automotive multi-domain electronic control units (ECUs). They feature advanced AI processing capabilities and chiplet functions, serving as the core technology platform for next-generation automotive electrical/electronic (E/E) architectures. Renesas presented the results at the International Solid-State Circuits Conference 2026 (ISSCC 2026), held February 15–19 in San Francisco, USA.

    In the age of software-defined vehicles (SDVs), automotive SoCs require advanced performance to run multiple applications simultaneously and must offer scalability through chiplets. They must also meet the functional safety requirements of automotive SoCs. As multi-domain SoCs powering central computing are growing larger and more complex, maintaining automotive-grade quality is becoming more difficult. With increased performance in advanced SoCs, power consumption also rises, making improvements in power efficiency and safety vital. To meet these needs, Renesas has developed the following new technologies.

    1. Chiplet architecture that supports functional safety

    To meet the functional safety requirements of automotive SoCs, Renesas has developed a new, proprietary architecture that supports ASIL D even in a chiplet configuration. By combining the standard die-to-die UCIe interface with a proprietary RegionID mechanism, the architecture prevents interference with hardware resources, even when numerous applications run simultaneously, thereby achieving Freedom from Interference (FFI).

    Conventional UCIe interfaces lack functionality to transmit RegionIDs between dies. Renesas developed a method for mapping RegionIDs into physical address space, encoding them into the UCIe region, and transmitting them. This enables safe access control through the memory management unit (MMU) and real-time cores, and meets functional safety requirements across chiplets. Additionally, by maintaining bandwidth from processors to the memory bus, the UCIe interface was confirmed through testing to achieve a high transmission speed of 51.2 GB/s, approaching the upper limit of intra-SoC transfer speeds. This technology provides both scalability and safety for high-performance automotive SoCs.

    2. Advanced AI processing capabilities and automotive-grade quality

    Automotive-grade quality is vital for SDV systems. Renesas has created a 3 nm SoC design that improves the performance of neural processing units (NPUs) for AI processing, while maintaining automotive-grade quality. In recent years, NPUs have been growing larger, with their area expanding 1.5-fold compared to previous generations. This has led to increased clock latency between shared clock sources and individual circuits. To address this problem, Renesas has redesigned the clock architecture by splitting up clock pulse generators (CPGs), which in past designs were module-level units, and placing mini-CPGs (mCPGs) at the sub-module level. This greatly reduces clock latency and meets timing requirements.

    However, multi-layer mCPGs complicate test clock synchronization, which is critical for achieving zero defects in automotive applications. Renesas has integrated test circuits into the hierarchical CPG architecture and unified the signal path for user clocks and test clocks. The new design also synchronizes upper- and lower-level mCPGs under a single clock source in test mode. This makes unified phase adjustment possible. As a result, Renesas has been able to achieve quality aligned with zero-defect expectations, even for large-scale SoCs, providing the high reliability required for next-generation SDV automotive SoCs.

    3. Advanced power control and monitoring for improved power efficiency and safety

    To achieve the high level of performance required for automotive SoCs with improved power efficiency and safety, Renesas has developed advanced power gating technology that uses over 90 power domains. It enables precise power control, from several milliwatts to several tens of watts, depending on operating conditions. Furthermore, Renesas has split power switches (PSWs) into ring PSWs and row PSWs to reduce IR drops (voltage drops) associated with increasing current density from smaller process geometries. When power is turned on, the ring PSW suppresses rush currents. Then the row PSW equalizes impedance within the domain. Together, these reduce IR drops by roughly 13% compared with conventional designs.

    To meet ASIL D functional safety standards, the dual core lock step (DCLS) configuration controls the master and checker cores with independent power switches and controllers. With this design, even if one side fails, the failure can be detected through lockstep operation. Furthermore, loopback monitoring is performed for each PSW’s gate signal, so OFF states are detected when a failure occurs. A digital voltage meter (DVMON), which is highly resistant to temperature drift, is used for voltage monitoring. This improves aging tolerance by 1.4 mV. These technologies enable high-performance automotive SoCs that offer both power efficiency and safety.

    These new technologies are being used in Renesas’ R-Car X5H SoC for automotive multi-domain ECUs. With R-Car X5H, users can accelerate the evolution of SDVs while ensuring safety and enabling autonomous driving, digital cockpit and more.

    About Renesas Electronics Corporation

    Renesas Electronics Corporation (TSE: 6723) empowers a safer, smarter and more sustainable future where technology helps make our lives easier. A leading global provider of microcontrollers, Renesas combines our expertise in embedded processing, analog, power and connectivity to deliver complete semiconductor solutions. These Winning Combinations accelerate time to market for automotive, industrial, infrastructure and IoT applications, enabling billions of connected, intelligent devices that enhance the way people work and live. Learn more at renesas.com. Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, X, YouTube, and Instagram.

    (Remarks) All names of products or services mentioned in this press release are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


    The content in the press release, including, but not limited to, product prices and specifications, is based on the information as of the date indicated on the document, but may be subject to change without prior notice.


    Continue Reading

  • Japan exports growth surges nearly 17% in January as shipments to China surge

    Japan exports growth surges nearly 17% in January as shipments to China surge

    Containers at a shipping terminal in Yokohama, Japan on Oct. 18, 2021. Japan’s trade deficit surged in September as imports overwhelmed export growth.

    Kiyoshi Ota | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Japanese exports climbed 16.8% year on year in January, sharply beating market expectations and growing at their fastest rate since November 2022 as shipment to Asia and Western Europe surged, government data on Wednesday showed.

    Growth was higher than December’s 5.1%, and beat Reuters-polled economists’ estimates of 12%.

    Value of exports to China, Japan’s largest trading partner, jumped 32%, after rising 5.6% in December at a time when the two countries are locked in a diplomatic standoff over Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments over Taiwan.

    Shipments to the U.S. fell 5%, after declining 11.1% in December. Washington is Japan’s second largest trading partner.

    Region-wise, a near 26% jump in shipments to Asia and over 25% to Western Europe helped accelerate exports growth, and more than offset the 3.3% decline in North America.

    Food, machinery and electrical machinery — which includes chips — were commodities that saw the sharpest growth, up 31.3%, 14.3% and 27.3%, respectively.

    Transport equipment, which contributed over 20% to exports growth, climbed by 0.8%. The segment, which includes cars and auto parts and has been a key growth driver for Japanese exports, has come under pressure following U.S. tariffs.

    Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 index rose 0.9%, while the broader Topix gained 1.26%. The yen was marginally lower, trading at 153.43 against the U.S. dollar.

    Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

    Nikkei 225 performance so far this year

    Imports in January fell 2.5% year on year, compared with Reuters estimates of a 3% rise, and a 5.1% jump in the prior month.

    The stellar growth in outbound shipments will be a welcome start to the new year after Japan’s exports growth declined to 3.1% last year, compared to the 6.2% rise seen in 2024.

    The Japanese economy expanded by just 0.1% year on year in the fourth quarter, supported by private demand, but net exports shaved 0.8 percentage point off growth. For the full year, GDP grew 1.1% year on year, also weighed down by net exports.

    Japanese shipments fell during the middle of 2025, hit by U.S. tariff worries, but saw a rebound toward the end of the year after a trade deal with the U.S. was announced that saw duties slashed to 15%.

    The U.S. on Tuesday announced projects valued at $36 billion, according to a Reuters report, including an oil export facility in Texas, an industrial diamonds plant in Georgia and a natural gas power plant in Ohio, to be financed by Japan as part of its $550 billion U.S. investment pledge.

    “Our MASSIVE Trade Deal with Japan has just launched! Japan is now officially, and financially, moving forward with the FIRST set of Investments under its $550 BILLION Dollar Commitment to invest in the United States of America,” U.S. President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

    Last week, Japan’s Economy Minister Ryosei Akazawa was quoted by public broadcaster NHK as saying he hoped the initial projects would be finalized before Takaichi and Trump met.

    Trump had announced the meeting with Takaichi just before the Feb. 8 Lower House election, which saw Takaichi lead the ruling Liberal Democratic Party to a landslide victory.

    Continue Reading

  • Warner Bros reopens takeover talks with Paramount after receiving waiver from Netflix

    Warner Bros reopens takeover talks with Paramount after receiving waiver from Netflix

    NEW YORK (AP) — Warner Bros. Discovery is briefly reopening takeover talks with Skydance-owned Paramount to hear the company’s “best and final” offer, while the Hollywood giant continues to back the studio and streaming deal it struck with Netflix.

    In a Tuesday regulatory filing, Warner said it had received a waiver from Netflix to reopen talks with Paramount for the next seven days, or until Monday. Warner said this will allow the companies to discuss unresolved “deficiencies” and “clarify certain terms” of Paramount’s latest bid.

    WATCH: Proposed Warner Bros. sale prompts concerns among Hollywood’s creative community

    But in the meantime, Warner’s board is still recommending shareholders support of its proposed merger with Netflix. A special meeting is now scheduled for Friday, March 20 to hold a vote on that deal.

    In a statement, Netflix said it was confident that its proposed transaction “provides superior value and certainty” — but recognized “the ongoing distraction for WBD stockholders and the broader entertainment industry caused by PSKY’s antics.” The streaming giant noted it had granted Warner a seven-day waiver to “finally resolve this matter.”

    Warner’s leadership similarly reiterated its support for the Netflix deal.

    Meanwhile, Paramount called Tuesday’s actions from Warner’s board “unusual” and said the company could have determined whether Paramount’s offer was superior without a timed deadline. Still, Paramount said it was “nonetheless prepared to engage in good faith and constructive discussions.”

    Paramount added that it will continue to advance its tender offer priced at $30 per share, which it maintained was better than Netflix’s proposal, while also pursuing a proxy fight.

    The battle for Warner Bros. Discovery is complicated because Netflix and Paramount want different things. In December, Netflix agreed to buy Warner’s studio and streaming business for $72 billion, now in an all-cash transaction that would cover its legacy TV and movie production arms, as well as HBO Max. Including debt, the enterprise value of the deal is about $83 billion, or $27.75 per share, and would be finalized after Warner completes a previously-announced separation of its cable operations.

    Meanwhile, unlike Netflix, Paramount wants to acquire Warner’s entire company — including networks like CNN and Discovery — and went straight to shareholders with an all-cash, $77.9 billion hostile offer just days after the Netflix deal was announced.

    The enterprise value of Paramount’s bid currently stands around $108 billion including debt, or $30 per share. But Warner disclosed Tuesday that a Paramount representative separately informed the company it would up its offer to $31 per share “pending engagement.”

    Analysts at Raymond James said they had “long believed” Paramount was willing to raise its offer “and now it seems we are finally moving in that direction.” If Paramount were to up its price to $32 or $33 per share, they noted it would be “increasingly difficult to argue the Netflix agreement is superior,” although Netflix could then move to match the bid.

    “Netflix is still in the driver’s seat, but now having to make its case,” the analysts added in a Tuesday research note.

    Paramount has made more attempts to sweeten its offer recently. Last week, the company said it would pay Warner shareholders an added “ticking fee” if its deal doesn’t go through by the end of the year — amounting to 25 cents per share, or a total of $650 million, for every quarter after Dec. 31. Paramount also pledged to fund Warner’s proposed $2.8 billion breakup payout to Netflix under its merger agreement.

    The company has been scrambling to solidify more shareholder support. Paramount has extended its tender offer three times, with the latest deadline set for March 2. According to company disclosures, more than 42.3 million Warner shares had been “validly tendered and not withdrawn” from its hostile bid as of the start of last week, down from over 168.5 million Warner shares on Jan. 21 — still a small fraction of Warner’s 2.48 billion shares outstanding in series A common stock.

    But also last week, one activist investor, Ancora Holdings, publicly expressed opposition to Warner’s proposed merger with Netflix. And beyond its tender offer, Paramount has also promised a proxy fight. On Tuesday, the company reiterated plans to nominate its own slate of directors at Warner’s upcoming annual meeting.

    What, if anything, changes after the next seven days of talks has yet to be seen. Paramount, Warner and Netflix have spent the last couple of months in a heated back and forth over who has a stronger deal on the table.

    The prospect of a Warner sale to either company has raised tremendous antitrust concerns from lawmakers worldwide, who are calling on regulators to carefully scrutinize a merger of this size.

    The U.S. Department of Justice has already initiated its reviews, and other countries may also scrutinize either deal. Both Paramount and Netflix have said they received securities clearance from German authorities last month.

    Shares of Warner Bros. Discovery rose more than 3% in Tuesday trading. Paramount Skydance climbed over 5%, while Netflix’s stock inched up slightly.

    A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

    Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


    Continue Reading

  • FDA Approves New Treatment for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: What You Need to Know

    FDA Approves New Treatment for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: What You Need to Know

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a wearable medical device used in combination with a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The device, called Optune Pax®, delivers a treatment called Tumor Treating Fields Therapy (TTFields).

    Optune Pax with the chemotherapy combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is the first treatment to be FDA approved in nearly 30 years for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

    “The approval of Optune Pax is an important milestone for the pancreatic cancer community. Survival rates for pancreatic cancer have seen only modest improvements over time and treatment advances have remained limited, underscoring how challenging this disease is to treat,” said PanCAN’s Chief Scientific and Medical Officer Anna Berkenblit, MD, MMSc, in a press release from oncology company Novocure announcing the FDA approval. “This approval for locally advanced disease highlights the importance of continued innovation and investment in new approaches for difficult-to-treat cancers and represents meaningful progress for patients who urgently need more options.”

    Medical oncologist Vincent Picozzi, M.D., MMM, a PanCAN Scientific and Medical Advisory Board member and investigator for the Phase III clinical trial that led to the treatment’s approval, calls the trial an important milestone as it is the first-ever positive randomized trial for locally advanced disease. He’s hopeful it will provide a foundation for future advances.

    “[In the clinical trial], treatment with Optune Pax resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival without adding to the systemic side effects commonly associated with existing therapies. It also significantly extended time to pain progression, helping to preserve overall quality of life, which is a priority when I am treating patients living with pancreatic cancer,” Dr. Picozzi said. “With FDA approval, Optune Pax has the potential to be practice changing for the treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.”

    In this blog post, PanCAN addresses questions related to this news.

    What patients can receive this new treatment?

    This treatment is approved for patients with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This means that cancer has not spread far beyond their pancreas (has not metastasized) but has advanced to the point where it can’t be surgically removed.

    What is Optune Pax? And what is TTFields?

    Optune Pax is the wearable medical device developed by Novocure that delivers TTFields to patients with pancreatic cancer. The device is designed to be worn with the generator carried in a specially designed bag, allowing patients to receive continuous treatment while going about their normal daily activities, according to a statement about the approval from the FDA.

    TTFields is a therapeutic option that has previously been approved by the FDA to treat glioblastoma, a type of tumor found in the brain and spinal cord, and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. It uses electric fields to slow and reverse tumor growth by inhibiting mitosis (the process by which cells divide and replicate). TTFields does not significantly affect healthy cells because they have different properties than cancer cells.

    What is the evidence for this treatment’s effectiveness for pancreatic cancer?

    In December 2024, Novocure announced results from a Phase III clinical trial that studied the treatment as a first-line therapy (the first treatment given for a disease) for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It enrolled 571 trial participants and they were randomly divided into two groups: One group received TTFields in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. The second group received gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone.

    At the end of the trial, participants who received the TTFields survived an average of two months longer than patients who received only the chemotherapies.

    The overall survival benefit of two months for patients treated with TTFields is statistically significant, which means that it was unlikely to have occurred by chance. Specifically, patients who were treated with TTFields in addition to chemotherapy lived an average of 16.2 months, whereas patients treated with chemotherapy alone lived an average of 14.2 months.

    Other notable results reported by the company: As compared to those treated with chemotherapy alone, patients treated with Optune Pax and the chemotherapy regimen reported six additional months until they experienced pain progression. This group of patients also reported improvement on several quality-of-life measures, such as digestive problems and fatigue.

    Novocure presented their findings at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting and published results from the clinical trial at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in May 2025.

    What are the side effects?

    The most common device-related side effect reported is mild to moderate skin irritation beneath the arrays. When TTFields are delivered, the arrays may cause mild warming and tingling of the skin underneath them.

    I am a patient with pancreatic cancer interested in this treatment. What should I do?

    People with locally advanced pancreatic cancer should talk to their healthcare team about this treatment option. Contact PanCAN Patient Services for additional information. Our expert Case Managers can provide patients and their caregivers with accurate, up-to-date information about this and other treatment options. Resources available to patients include personalized clinical trials searches, a list of specialists across the country and a free booklet with in-depth information specific to diagnosis and treatment.

    Does insurance cover this treatment?

    FDA approval means this drug combination is safe and effective, and although the FDA does not decide what is covered by insurance, when a drug gets FDA approval, Medicare and Medicaid will usually cover it.  Coverage for cancer drugs will vary based on the specific plan and insurance company a person uses.

    Contact PanCAN Patient Services for more information on financial assistance programs for those experiencing or anticipating cost-related barriers to care.

    Contact a PanCAN Patient Services Case Manager
    We are here to help. Contact PanCAN Patient Services with any questions related to treatments for pancreatic cancer.

    Continue Reading

  • Halliburton awarded geothermal project by KS Orka Renewables in Indonesia

    Halliburton awarded geothermal project by KS Orka Renewables in Indonesia

    Halliburton received a multiyear contract from KS Orka Renewables Pte. Ltd. to support geothermal well construction for the PT Sorik Marapi Geothermal Power (SMGP) and PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia (SGI) projects in Indonesia. The award covers several development phases for both projects and reinforces Halliburton’s long-term dedication to geothermal energy solutions worldwide.

    Under the agreement, Halliburton will deploy advanced drilling technologies and operational expertise to help improve efficiency, reduce costs, and accelerate the deployment of sustainable geothermal power in the region. Halliburton will provide a full suite of services for the geothermal projects, such as directional drilling, cementing, drilling fluids, and drill bits for the SMGP and SGI projects.

    KS Orka Renewables expands Indonesia’s geothermal power supply after a decade of service. Halliburton’s 70-year legacy of geothermal well development and execution around the world positions the company as an ideal collaborator to support KS Orka Renewables’ vision and extend these two landmark projects.

    Duane Sherritt, vice president of Low Carbon Solutions at Halliburton

    The collaboration pairs KS Orka Renewables, which operates as part of a broader corporate group affiliated with Kaishan Group Co., Ltd., and has experience in the delivery of cost-efficient geothermal wells, with Halliburton’s integrated solutions and technical capabilities. Together, the companies plan to improve drilling performance and help meet Indonesia’s demand for reliable, low-carbon energy.

    “Kaishan Group welcomes the opportunity to extend its relationship with Halliburton to meet our geothermal power goals in Indonesia and help us deliver some of the lowest cost per foot geothermal wells in the country,” said Cao Kejian, chief executive officer of Kaishan Group Co., Ltd. “Halliburton, as a critical member of our team, will support the drilling phase of the project and help expand current capacity.”

    This award strengthens Halliburton’s Low Carbon Solutions portfolio and underscores the company’s role in geothermal development within the global energy mix.

    Continue Reading

  • Huntsman Announces Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings :: Huntsman Corporation (HUN)

    Huntsman Announces Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings :: Huntsman Corporation (HUN)

    Fourth Quarter Highlights

    • Fourth quarter 2025 net loss attributable to Huntsman of $96 million compared to a net loss of $141 million in the prior year period; fourth quarter 2025 diluted loss per share of $0.56 compared to diluted loss per share $0.82 in the prior year period.
    • Fourth quarter 2025 adjusted net loss attributable to Huntsman of $63 million compared to adjusted net loss of $43 million in the prior year period; fourth quarter 2025 adjusted diluted loss per share of $0.37 compared to adjusted diluted loss per share of $0.25 in the prior year period.
    • Fourth quarter 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $35 million compared to $71 million in the prior year period.
    • Fourth quarter 2025 net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was $77 million. Free cash flow from continuing operations was $20 million for the fourth quarter 2025 compared to free cash flow of $108 million in the prior year period.














    Three months ended

    Twelve months ended

    December 31,

    December 31,

    In millions, except per share amounts

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024


    Revenues

    $     1,355

    $     1,452

    $     5,683

    $     6,036


    Net loss attributable to Huntsman Corporation

    $        (96)

    $       (141)

    $       (284)

    $       (189)

    Adjusted net loss(1)

    $        (63)

    $        (43)

    $       (121)

    $        (13)


    Diluted loss per share

    $      (0.56)

    $      (0.82)

    $      (1.65)

    $      (1.10)

    Adjusted diluted loss per share(1)

    $      (0.37)

    $      (0.25)

    $      (0.70)

    $      (0.08)


    Adjusted EBITDA(1)

    $          35

    $          71

    $        275

    $        414


    Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations

    $          77

    $        159

    $        298

    $        285

    Free cash flow from continuing operations(2)

    $          20

    $        108

    $        125

    $        101


    See end of press release for footnote explanations and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures.


    THE WOODLANDS, Texas, Feb. 17, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN) today reported fourth quarter 2025 results with revenues of $1,355 million, net loss attributable to Huntsman of $96 million, adjusted net loss attributable to Huntsman of $63 million and adjusted EBITDA of $35 million. 

    Peter R. Huntsman, Chairman, President, and CEO, commented:

    “During 2025, there was an exceptional amount of work accomplished by the Company in restructuring our business and generating cash despite the depressed level of earnings. We generated close to $300 million of cash flow from operations in 2025 and our 45% full year free cash flow conversion reflects timely, definitive decisions as we recognized the challenging market landscape early in the year. We remain confident that the economic cycle for chemicals will eventually improve in our core markets, though we recognize that meaningful changes may not occur in the immediate term. We are committed to maintaining a disciplined approach, prioritizing cash management, the balance sheet and controlling our fixed costs to ensure the Company is well-positioned when our markets improve.”

    Segment Analysis for 4Q25 Compared to 4Q24

    Polyurethanes

    The decrease in revenues in our Polyurethanes segment for the three months ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period of 2024 was primarily due to lower average selling prices, partially offset by higher sales volumes. MDI average selling prices decreased primarily due to less favorable supply and demand dynamics. Sales volumes increased in the Americas and Asia regions. The decrease in segment adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower MDI margins.

    Performance Products

    The decrease in revenues in our Performance Products segment for the three months ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period of 2024 was primarily due to lower average selling prices. Average selling prices decreased primarily due to competitive pressures. Sales volumes were relatively stable. The decrease in segment adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to lower revenues and an unfavorable impact from reduced inventory, partially offset by lower fixed costs.

    Advanced Materials

    The decrease in revenues in our Advanced Materials segment for the three months ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period of 2024 was primarily due to lower sales volumes, partially offset by higher average selling prices. Sales volumes decreased in our infrastructure coatings and general industry segments due to soft demand. Average selling prices increased primarily due to the positive impact of major foreign currency exchange rate movements against the U.S. dollar. Segment adjusted EBITDA was slightly lower primarily due to decreased sales volumes.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources

    During the three months ended December 31, 2025, our free cash flow from continuing operations was $20 million as compared to $108 million in the same period of 2024. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1.3 billion of combined cash and unused borrowing capacity.

    During the three months ended December 31, 2025, we spent $57 million on capital expenditures from continuing operations as compared to $51 million in the same period of 2024. During 2026, we expect similar capital expenditure levels as to the 2025 year.

    Income Taxes

    In the fourth quarter of 2025, our effective tax rate was -1% and our adjusted effective tax rate was -14%.

    Earnings Conference Call Information

    We will hold a conference call to discuss our fourth quarter 2025 financial results on Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. ET.

    Webcast link: https://event.choruscall.com/mediaframe/webcast.html?webcastid=IMeg0PNW

    Participant dial-in numbers:
    Domestic callers:                     (877) 402-8037
    International callers:                (201) 378-4913

    The conference call will be accompanied by presentation slides that will be accessible via the webcast link and Huntsman’s investor relations website, www.huntsman.com/investors. Upon conclusion of the call, the webcast replay will be accessible via Huntsman’s website.

    Upcoming Conferences

    During the first quarter 2026, a member of management is expected to present at:
    Bank of America Securities 2026 Global Agriculture and Materials Conference, February 25, 2026  
    Alembic Materials and Industrials Conference, March 4-6, 2026

    A webcast of the presentation, if applicable, along with accompanying materials will be available at www.huntsman.com/investors.

     






































    Table 1 – Results of Operations


    Three months ended

    Twelve months ended

    December 31,

    December 31,

    In millions, except per share amounts

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024


    Revenues

    $     1,355

    $     1,452

    $     5,683

    $     6,036

    Cost of goods sold

    1,191

    1,264

    4,932

    5,170

    Gross profit

    164

    188

    751

    866

    Operating expenses:


    Selling, general and administrative

    181

    166

    670

    671

    Research and development

    26

    30

    120

    121

    Restructuring, impairment and plant closing costs

    11

    19

    148

    39

    Income associated with litigation matter, net

    (33)

    Gain on acquisition of assets, net

    (5)

    (51)

    Prepaid asset write-off

    71

    Loss on dissolution of subsidiaries

    39

    39

    Other operating expense (income), net

    5

    (3)

    (18)

    1

    Total operating expenses

    223

    251

    882

    891

    Operating loss

    (59)

    (63)

    (131)

    (25)

    Interest expense, net

    (19)

    (19)

    (79)

    (79)

    Equity in income of investment in unconsolidated affiliates

    4

    2

    4

    44

    Other income (expense), net

    1

    (1)

    14

    21

    Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

    (73)

    (81)

    (192)

    (39)

    Income tax expense

    (1)

    (29)

    (26)

    (61)

    Loss from continuing operations

    (74)

    (110)

    (218)

    (100)

    Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

    (8)

    (15)

    (9)

    (27)

    Net loss

    (82)

    (125)

    (227)

    (127)

    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (14)

    (16)

    (57)

    (62)

    Net loss attributable to Huntsman Corporation

    $        (96)

    $       (141)

    $       (284)

    $       (189)


    Adjusted EBITDA(1)

    $          35

    $          71

    $        275

    $        414

    Adjusted net loss (1)

    $        (63)

    $        (43)

    $       (121)

    $        (13)


    Basic loss per share

    $      (0.56)

    $      (0.82)

    $      (1.65)

    $      (1.10)

    Diluted loss per share

    $      (0.56)

    $      (0.82)

    $      (1.65)

    $      (1.10)

    Adjusted diluted loss per share(1)

    $      (0.37)

    $      (0.25)

    $      (0.70)

    $      (0.08)


    Common share information:


    Basic weighted average shares

    173

    172

    173

    172

    Diluted weighted average shares

    173

    172

    173

    172

    Diluted shares for adjusted diluted loss per share

    173

    172

    173

    172


    See end of press release for footnote explanations.


     















    Table 2 – Results of Operations by Segment 


    Three months ended

    Twelve months ended


    December 31,

    (Worse) /

    December 31,

    (Worse) /

    In millions

    2025

    2024

    better

    2025

    2024

    better


    Segment revenues:


    Polyurethanes

    $        897

    $        970

    (8 %)

    $     3,697

    $     3,900

    (5 %)

    Performance Products

    224

    239

    (6 %)

    997

    1,109

    (10 %)

    Advanced Materials

    243

    254

    (4 %)

    1,021

    1,055

    (3 %)

    Total reportable segments’ revenues

    1,364

    1,463

    (7 %)

    5,715

    6,064

    (6 %)


    Intersegment eliminations

    (9)

    (11)

    n/m

    (32)

    (28)

    n/m


    Total revenues

    $     1,355

    $     1,452

    (7 %)

    $     5,683

    $     6,036

    (6 %)


    Segment adjusted EBITDA(1):


    Polyurethanes

    $          25

    $          50

    (50 %)

    $        146

    $        245

    (40 %)

    Performance Products

    16

    23

    (30 %)

    107

    153

    (30 %)

    Advanced Materials

    36

    37

    (3 %)

    161

    179

    (10 %)

    n/m = not meaningful


    See end of press release for footnote explanations.


     








    Table 3 – Factors Impacting Sales Revenue


    Three months ended

    December 31, 2025 vs. 2024

    Average selling price(a)


    Local

    Exchange

    Sales


    currency & mix

    rate

    volume(b)

    Total



    Polyurethanes

    (11 %)

    1 %

    2 %

    (8 %)



    Performance Products

    (6 %)

    1 %

    (1 %)

    (6 %)



    Advanced Materials

    1 %

    2 %

    (7 %)

    (4 %)



    Combined segments

    (8 %)

    1 %

    0 %

    (7 %)



    Twelve months ended

    December 31, 2025 vs. 2024

    Average selling price(a)


    Local

    Exchange

    Sales


    currency & mix

    rate

    volume(b)

    Total



    Polyurethanes

    (7 %)

    0 %

    2 %

    (5 %)



    Performance Products

    (1 %)

    0 %

    (9 %)

    (10 %)



    Advanced Materials

    (2 %)

    1 %

    (2 %)

    (3 %)



    Combined segments

    (5 %)

    0 %

    (1 %)

    (6 %)



    (a) Excludes sales from tolling arrangements, by-products and raw materials.


    (b) Excludes sales from by-products and raw materials.


     




    Table 4 — Reconciliation of U.S. GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures


     Income tax 

     Net 

     Diluted (loss) income 


     EBITDA 

    and other expense

     loss 

     per share 


    Three months ended

    Three months ended

    Three months ended

    Three months ended


    December 31,

    December 31,

    December 31,

    December 31,


    In millions, except per share amounts

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024



    Net loss

    $         (82)

    $       (125)

    $         (82)

    $       (125)

    $      (0.48)

    $      (0.73)


    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (14)

    (16)

    (14)

    (16)

    (0.08)

    (0.09)



    Net loss attributable to Huntsman Corporation

    (96)

    (141)

    (96)

    (141)

    (0.56)

    (0.82)


    Interest expense, net from continuing operations

    19

    19


    Income tax expense from continuing operations

    1

    29

    $           (1)

    $         (29)


    Income tax benefit from discontinued operations

    (1)

    (3)


    Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations

    73

    75


    Business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, net

    1

    (1)

    1

    (1)

    0.01

    (0.01)


    EBITDA / Loss from discontinued operations

    9

    18

     N/A 

     N/A 

    8

    15

    0.05

    0.09


    Establishment of significant deferred tax asset valuation allowances, net

    23

    23

    0.13


    Loss on sale of business/assets

    3

    (1)

    (3)

    2

    (3)

    0.01

    (0.02)


    Loss on dissolution of subsidiaries

    39

    39

    0.23


    Fair value adjustments to Venator investment, net and other tax matter adjustments

    1

    1

    0.01


    Certain legal and other settlements and related expenses, net

    2

    (4)

    2

    (4)

    0.01

    (0.02)


    Amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses

    12

    14

    (4)

    12

    10

    0.07

    0.06


    Restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs

    12

    21

    (4)

    (3)

    8

    18

    0.05

    0.10



    Adjusted(1)

    $          35

    $          71

    $           (6)

    $         (20)

    (63)

    (43)

    $      (0.37)

    $      (0.25)



    Adjusted income tax expense(1)

    6

    20


    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    14

    16



    Adjusted pre-tax loss (1)

    $         (43)

    $           (7)



    Adjusted effective tax rate(3)

    (14 %)

    N/M



    Effective tax rate

    (1 %)

    (36 %)



     Income tax 

     Net 

     Diluted (loss) income 


     EBITDA 

    and other expense

     loss 

     per share 


    Twelve months ended

    Twelve months ended

    Twelve months ended

    Twelve months ended


    December 31,

    December 31,

    December 31,

    December 31,


    In millions, except per share amounts

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024



    Net loss

    $       (227)

    $       (127)

    $       (227)

    $       (127)

    $      (1.32)

    $      (0.74)


    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (57)

    (62)

    (57)

    (62)

    (0.33)

    (0.36)



    Net loss attributable to Huntsman Corporation

    (284)

    (189)

    (284)

    (189)

    (1.65)

    (1.10)


    Interest expense, net from continuing operations

    79

    79


    Income tax expense from continuing operations

    26

    61

    $         (26)

    $         (61)


    Income tax benefit from discontinued operations(3)

    (11)


    Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations

    287

    289


    Business acquisition and integration (gain) expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments

    (4)

    21

    (17)

    (4)

    4

    (0.02)

    0.02


    EBITDA / Loss from discontinued operations(3)

    9

    38

    N/A

    N/A

    9

    27

    0.05

    0.16


    Establishment of significant deferred tax asset valuation allowances, net

    1

    23

    1

    23

    0.01

    0.13


    Income tax settlement related to U.S. Tax Reform Act

    5

    5

    0.03


    Loss on sale of business/assets

    5

    1

    (1)

    4

    1

    0.02

    0.01


    Loss on dissolution of subsidiaries

    39

    39

    0.23


    Fair value adjustments to Venator investment, net and other tax matter adjustments

    (12)

    3

    (9)

    (0.05)


    Certain legal and other settlements and related (income) expenses, net

    (30)

    13

    7

    (3)

    (23)

    10

    (0.13)

    0.06


    Amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses

    34

    39

    (4)

    (3)

    30

    36

    0.17

    0.21


    Restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs

    153

    46

    (7)

    (6)

    146

    40

    0.85

    0.23



    Adjusted(1)

    $        275

    $        414

    $         (30)

    $         (59)

    (121)

    (13)

    $      (0.70)

    $      (0.08)



    Adjusted income tax expense(1)

    30

    59


    Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    57

    62



    Adjusted pre-tax (loss) income(1)

    $         (34)

    $        108



    Adjusted effective tax rate(4)

    (88 %)

    55 %



    Effective tax rate

    (14 %)

    (156 %)



    N/M = not meaningful


    N/A = not applicable


    See end of press release for footnote explanations.


     






















    Table 5 – Balance Sheets


    December 31,

    December 31,

    In millions

    2025

    2024


    Cash

    $               429

    $               340

    Accounts and notes receivable, net

    677

    725

    Inventories

    818

    917

    Prepaid expenses

    94

    114

    Other current assets

    46

    29

    Property, plant and equipment, net

    2,486

    2,493

    Other noncurrent assets

    2,465

    2,496


    Total assets

    $            7,015

    $            7,114


    Accounts payable

    $               721

    $               770

    Other current liabilities

    515

    470

    Current portion of debt

    353

    325

    Long-term debt

    1,658

    1,510

    Other noncurrent liabilities

    811

    876

    Huntsman Corporation stockholders’ equity

    2,750

    2,959

    Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

    207

    204


    Total liabilities and equity

    $            7,015

    $            7,114

     














    Table 6 – Outstanding Debt


    December 31,

    December 31,

    In millions

    2025

    2024


    Debt:


    Revolving credit facility

    $               343

    $                  –

    Senior notes

    1,488

    1,799

    Accounts receivable programs

    152

    Variable interest entities

    7

    16

    Other debt

    21

    20


    Total debt – excluding affiliates

    2,011

    1,835


    Total cash

    429

    340


    Net debt – excluding affiliates(4)

    $            1,582

    $            1,495


    See end of press release for footnote explanations.


     


























    Table 7 – Summarized Statements of Cash Flows


    Three months ended

    Twelve months ended

    December 31,

    December 31,

    In millions

    2025

    2024

    2025

    2024


    Total cash at beginning of period

    $            468

    $            330

    $            340

    $            540


    Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations

    77

    159

    298

    285

    Net cash used in operating activities from discontinued operations

    (1)

    (6)

    (9)

    (22)

    Net cash used in investing activities

    (58)

    (39)

    (132)

    (126)

    Net cash used in financing activities

    (62)

    (95)

    (76)

    (326)

    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

    5

    (9)

    8

    (11)


    Total cash at end of period

    $            429

    $            340

    $            429

    $            340


    Free cash flow from continuing operations(2):


    Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations

    $              77

    $            159

    $            298

    $            285

    Capital expenditures

    (57)

    (51)

    (173)

    (184)


    Free cash flow from continuing operations(2)

    $              20

    $            108

    $            125

    $            101


    Supplemental cash flow information:


    Cash paid for interest

    $             (37)

    $             (22)

    $             (86)

    $             (77)

    Cash paid for income taxes

    (19)

    (30)

    (98)

    (90)

    Cash paid for restructuring and integration

    (11)

    (3)

    (29)

    (29)

    Cash paid for pensions

    (8)

    (9)

    (33)

    (35)

    Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations

    73

    75

    287

    289


    Change in primary working capital:


    Accounts and notes receivable

    $              97

    $              79

    $              71

    $                7

    Inventories

    19

    60

    133

    (77)

    Accounts payable

    15

    48

    (88)

    69

    Total change in primary working capital

    $            131

    $            187

    $            116

    $              (1)


    See end of press release for footnote explanations.


     












    Footnotes


    (1)

    We use adjusted EBITDA to measure the operating performance of our business and for planning and evaluating the performance of our business segments.  We provide adjusted net income (loss) because we feel it provides meaningful insight for the investment community into the performance of our business.  We believe that net income (loss) is the performance measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”) that is most directly comparable to adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income (loss).  Additional information with respect to our use of each of these financial measures follows:


    Adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income (loss) and adjusted diluted income (loss) per share, as used herein, are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.


    Adjusted EBITDA is computed by eliminating the following from net income (loss):  (a) net income attributable to noncontrolling interests; (b) interest expense, net; (c) income taxes; (d) depreciation and amortization; (e) amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses; (f) restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs; and further adjusted for certain other items set forth in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA in Table 4 above. 


    Adjusted net income (loss) and adjusted diluted income (loss) per share are computed by eliminating the after tax impact of the following items from net income (loss): (a) net income attributable to noncontrolling interests; (b) amortization of pension and postretirement actuarial losses; (c) restructuring, impairment and plant closing and transition costs; and further adjusted for certain other items set forth in the reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted net income (loss) in Table 4 above.  The income tax impacts, if any, of each adjusting item represent a ratable allocation of the total difference between the unadjusted tax expense and the total adjusted tax expense, computed without consideration of any adjusting items using a with and without approach.


    We may disclose forward-looking adjusted EBITDA because we cannot adequately forecast certain items and events that may or may not impact us in the near future, such as business acquisition and integration expenses and purchase accounting inventory adjustments, net, certain legal and other settlements and related expenses, gains on sale of businesses/assets and certain tax only items, including tax law changes not yet enacted. Each of such adjustment has not yet occurred, is out of our control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. In our view, our forward-looking adjusted EBITDA represents the forecast net income on our underlying business operations but does not reflect any adjustments related to the items noted above that may occur and can cause our adjusted EBITDA to differ.


    (2)

    We believe free cash flow is an important indicator of our liquidity as it measures the amount of cash we generate. Management internally uses free cash flow measure to: (a) evaluate our liquidity, (b) evaluate strategic investments, (c) plan stock buyback and dividend levels and (d) evaluate our ability to incur and service debt. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less capital expenditures. Free cash flow is not a defined term under U.S. GAAP, and it should not be inferred that the entire free cash flow amount is available for discretionary expenditures.


    (3)

    We believe the adjusted effective tax rate provides improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items that management believes are not indicative of the businesses’ operational profitability and that may obscure underlying business results and trends. In our view, effective tax rate is the performance measure calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP that is most directly comparable to adjusted effective tax rate. The reconciliation of historical adjusted effective tax rate and effective tax rate is set forth in Table 4 above. Please see the reconciliation of our net income to adjusted net income in Table 4 for details regarding the tax impacts of our non-GAAP adjustments.


    (4)

    Net debt is a measure we use to monitor how much debt we have after taking into account our total cash. We use it as an indicator of our overall financial position, and calculate it by taking our total debt, including the current portion, and subtracting total cash.

    About Huntsman:
    Huntsman Corporation is a publicly traded global manufacturer and marketer of differentiated and specialty chemicals with 2025 revenues of approximately $6 billion from our continuing operations. Our chemical products number in the thousands and are sold worldwide to manufacturers serving a broad and diverse range of consumer and industrial end markets. We operate more than 55 manufacturing, R&D and operations facilities in approximately 25 countries and employ approximately 6,000 associates within our continuing operations. For more information about Huntsman, please visit the company’s website at www.huntsman.com.

    Social Media:
    X: http://www.x.com/Huntsman_Corp
    Facebook: www.facebook.com/huntsmancorp
    LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/huntsman

    Forward-Looking Statements: 
    This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenue or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, divestitures or strategic transactions, business trends and any other information that is not historical information. When used in this press release, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “likely,” “projects,” “outlook,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “forecasts,” or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “should,” “could” or “may,” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and data, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions and beliefs. In particular, such forward-looking statements are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances and involve risks and uncertainties that may affect the Company’s operations, markets, products, prices and other factors as discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Significant risks and uncertainties may relate to, but are not limited to, high energy costs in Europe, inflation and high capital costs, geopolitical instability, volatile global economic conditions, cyclical and volatile product markets, disruptions in production at manufacturing facilities, reorganization or restructuring of the Company’s operations, including any delay of, or other negative developments affecting the ability to implement cost reductions and manufacturing optimization improvements in the Company’s businesses and to realize anticipated cost savings, and other financial, operational, economic, competitive, environmental, political, legal, regulatory and technological factors. Any forward-looking statement should be considered in light of the risks set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, which may be supplemented by other risks and uncertainties disclosed in any subsequent reports filed or furnished by the Company from time to time. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/huntsman-announces-fourth-quarter-2025-earnings-302689954.html

    SOURCE Huntsman Corporation

    Continue Reading

  • HII Teams with Path Robotics to Integrate Physical AI into Manned and Unmanned Shipbuilding – HII

    1. HII Teams with Path Robotics to Integrate Physical AI into Manned and Unmanned Shipbuilding  HII
    2. Saronic explores integrating AI welding robotics across its shipyard ops  Marine Log
    3. Columbus AI robotics company tops $100M in sales, plans 100 jobs  The Business Journals
    4. LAD Services Partners with Path Robotics to Revolutionize Barge Manufacturing with Physical AI for Welding  AZoM
    5. Media Advisory — HII and Path Robotics to Advance Shipbuilding with Physical AI  Yahoo Finance

    Continue Reading

  • 12-hour days, no weekends: the anxiety driving AI’s brutal work culture is a warning for all of us | AI (artificial intelligence)

    12-hour days, no weekends: the anxiety driving AI’s brutal work culture is a warning for all of us | AI (artificial intelligence)

    Not long after the terms “996” and “grindcore” entered the popular lexicon, people started telling me stories about what was happening at startups in San Francisco, ground zero for the artificial intelligence economy. There was the one about the founder who hadn’t taken a weekend off in more than six months. The woman who joked that she’d given up her social life to work at a prestigious AI company. Or the employees who had started taking their shoes off in the office because, well, if you were going to be there for at least 12 hours a day, six days a week, wouldn’t you rather be wearing slippers?

    “If you go to a cafe on a Sunday, everyone is working,” says Sanju Lokuhitige, the co-founder of Mythril, a pre-seed-stage AI startup, who moved to San Francisco in November to be closer to the action. Lokuhitige says he works seven days a week, 12 hours a day, minus a few carefully selected social events each week where he can network with other people at startups. “Sometimes I’m coding the whole day,” he says. “I do not have work-life balance.”

    Another startup employee, who came to San Francisco to work for an early-stage AI company, showed me dismal photos from his office: a two-bedroom apartment in the Dogpatch, a neighborhood popular with tech workers. His startup’s founders live and work in this apartment – from 9am until as late as 3am, breaking only to DoorDash meals or to sleep, and leaving the building only to take cigarette breaks. The employee (who asked not to use his name, since he still works for this company) described the situation as “horrendous”. “I’d heard about 996, but these guys don’t even do 996,” he says. “They’re working 16-hour days.”

    Startups have never been particularly glamorous. When I started reporting on the industry a decade ago, people were cashing in on the new mobile app economy, and coders were chugging Soylent to stay at their desks longer. Startups then, too, were defined by hustle culture, high-octane energy and the pursuit of growth at all costs – ideas that, to some extent, have remained in the bloodstream of the industry.

    But in the last year, as the magic dust of artificial intelligence has settled in San Francisco, the vibe among tech workers does seem different. The excitement about a new epoch in tech – and all the money that comes with it – is now tempered with anxieties about the industry, and the economy. Some workers are going all in on AI while also questioning whether all that AI is good for the world. Others are effectively training machines to do their jobs better than they can. And many of the same workers who are racing to build the future are now wondering if the future they’re building has a place for them in it.

    The rest of us may be ambiently aware of these anxieties, but they are already tangible and keenly felt inside the tech industry. Even the biggest tech companies, once known for coddling employees with on-site massages and barber shops, have scaled back perks as they have escalated the expectations of workers. Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk have each been candid about their predictions that AI will replace some junior and mid-level engineers at their companies, and have respectively called for their workforces to be more “efficient” and “extremely hard core” as waves of layoffs set employees on-edge. Tech companies laid off about a quarter of a million workers around the world in 2025, according to a report published by RationalFX. In many of those layoffs, AI was cited as a main factor, even if the full reason for layoffs is often more complex.

    “If you were a software engineer five years ago, you could kind of write your ticket,” says Mike Robbins, an executive coach who has worked with companies like Google, Microsoft, Salesforce and Airbnb. Now, the balance of power has shifted away from tech workers, many of whom are left feeling anxious about their work performance. “When companies become less scared about losing employees, then they can be a little more forthright in terms of what they want and be a little more demanding.”

    Robbins, who wrote the book Bring Your Whole Self to Work, used to be asked to speak to companies and their leaders about topics like employee burnout, wellbeing and belonging – top priorities in the years during and shortly after the pandemic. “Quite frankly, we’ve stopped talking about all that,” he says. Now, company leaders want advice on topics like change, disruption and uncertainty in the workplace.

    Those themes – change, disruption and uncertainty – are each part of the fuel that has driven tech workers to put in more hours, at a higher intensity. Investment in artificial intelligence companies reached record highs in 2025, yet workers are feeling scarcity in ways they haven’t before.

    “It’s definitely something that’s on everyone’s mind,” says Kyle Finken, a software engineer at Mintlify, which makes an AI tool for developers. “I think a lot of people are concerned like, ‘Oh, am I going to have a job in three years?’”

    Despite his fears, Finken, like many other startup employees I spoke to, feels energized by the “extraordinary innovation” happening in artificial intelligence and believes that there will still be plenty of jobs for software engineers in the future, even if those jobs look different from the pure coding roles of today. He and other tech workers characterized the current moment as a particularly creative and productive time in tech, where people are devoting extra hours to work not because their employers demand it but out of genuine interest in the new tools and capabilities. For example, Garry Tan, the head of the famous startup accelerator Y Combinator, recently bragged that he “stayed up 19 hours” playing around with Claude Code.

    Even those who felt excited about the pace of change acknowledged that AI was rapidly augmenting their work, in ways that could have uncertain outcomes for the jobs of the future. “This is definitely not an era of complacency,” says Finken.

    One reason for working so many hours is to keep up with tools and technology that are changing nearly every day. If you take the weekend off, you can miss a major development, which makes it harder to keep up with what competitors are doing. Another reason is to have something to show future employers, especially as more junior-level jobs are replaced by AI.

    “No one hires junior developers any more,” says Lokuhitige, the Mythril co-founder. Landing a job now requires “doing something cool”, he says, like building a new product or solving a problem that gets recognized as useful by larger companies. Job postings for entry-level tech jobs have dropped by a third since 2022, according to Indeed’s Hiring Lab, while job postings requiring at least five years of experience have risen. If you’re not grinding at a startup, you’re missing the prerequisite to get hired in the future.

    What this means for the rest of us

    While economists are torn about whether AI will replace most jobs or just change them, they seem aligned in the idea that AI has already reshaped a great deal of entry-level work and will continue to do so. A paper published by Stanford researchers in November found “substantial declines in employment for early-career workers” in industries exposed to AI and suggested that areas where change is already occurring could be like a “canary in the coalmine” for the rest of the economy. The Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, has suggested AI could eliminate about half of all entry-level jobs in white-collar industries within the next five years.

    The head of the International Monetary Fund recently predicted that 60% of jobs in advanced economies will be eliminated or transformed by artificial intelligence, “like a tsunami hitting the labour market”. In San Francisco, you can already see the early signs, as Uber drivers compete with self-driving Waymos, and baristas are replaced by robotic coffee bars. Professional business services that support the tech industry have also been negatively affected by the layoffs. The pressure to grind in the tech world could be an early signal – a harbinger for what many other industries will feel soon.

    Robbins, the executive coach, says that companies once looked to Silicon Valley as a model of how they should operate, down to emulating policies like unlimited vacation days or adopting perks like free lunch in the office.

    “There was an idealization of tech and Silicon Valley for a long time across the business world. Some of that has changed,” he says. “Now, people aren’t asking me to tell them what’s going on in the Valley so that they can adopt it, the same way they were a decade ago.”

    Rather than a model of how we should all work, the tech industry may be a premonition for the anxiety and attempts to compensate that are coming for all of us.

    Continue Reading

  • ICE reliance on Microsoft technology surged amid immigration crackdown, documents show | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

    ICE reliance on Microsoft technology surged amid immigration crackdown, documents show | ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deepened its reliance on Microsoft’s cloud technology last year as the agency ramped up arrest and deportation operations, leaked documents reveal.

    ICE more than tripled the amount of data it stored in Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform in the six months leading up to January 2026, a period in which the agency’s budget swelled and its workforce rapidly expanded, according to the files.

    ICE appears to be using a range of Microsoft’s productivity tools, as well as AI-driven products, to search and analyse the data it holds in Azure. Files suggest some of the agency’s own tools and systems may also be running on Microsoft servers.

    The documents – obtained by the Guardian and its partners +972 Magazine and Local Call – raise questions about whether Microsoft technology is facilitating an immigration crackdown by an agency accused of conducting unlawful operations and using excessive force on a large scale.

    ICE enforcement operations have surged over the past year as part of the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign. The agency is now at the centre of a battle in Congress over its funding, sparked by the deaths of two people in Minneapolis, that has led to a partial shutdown of the US government.

    In July, ICE received a $75bn budget increase, making it the highest-funded US law enforcement body. With this unprecedented increase in funds, the agency has embarked on a spending spree on technology, awarding contracts to large firms such as Palantir alongside lesser-known providers.

    ICE, which has been likened to a domestic surveillance agency, enjoys access to vast troves of data on people living in the US. It has a growing arsenal of surveillance technology, including facial recognition apps, phone location databases, drones, and invasive spyware.

    As the agency expanded through 2025, it boosted spending on cloud computing. Amazon and Microsoft, both longtime providers to ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), have emerged as beneficiaries of deals worth tens of millions of dollars struck by third-party resellers.

    The leaked documents do not specify the kinds of information stored by ICE on Microsoft servers. However, they indicate the agency has used Azure services including “blob storage” of raw data, as well as AI tools that analyse images and videos, and translate text.

    In January, according to the files, ICE held almost 1,400 terabytes in Azure, which if only comprised of photographs would be equivalent to approximately 490m images. This was up from 400 terabytes in July 2025 after climbing through the second half of last year, files suggest.

    ICE is also using virtual machines on Azure, according to the documents. These are effectively computers that run in the cloud but that can be accessed remotely. ICE appears to be renting these high-powered computers to run software.

    The agency, which has more than doubled its workforce since January 2025, is also understood to have significantly expanded its access to Microsoft’s suite of productivity apps which provide users with access to document management tools and an AI chatbot.

    It’s unclear from the files whether ICE is using Azure to store or analyse information collected through any of its surveillance or intelligence gathering activities, or whether the cloud platform supports other functions, such as the running of detention centres or deportation flights. ICE did not respond to a request for comment.

    A spokesperson for Microsoft said it “provides cloud-based productivity and collaboration tools to DHS and ICE, delivered through our key partners”. They said Microsoft’s policies and terms of service “do not allow our technology to be used for the mass surveillance of civilians, and we do not believe ICE is engaged in such activity”.

    The spokesperson added: “There are currently many public issues relating to immigration enforcement, and we believe Congress, the executive branch, and the courts have the opportunity to draw clear legal lines regarding the allowable use of emerging technologies by law enforcement.”

    Quick Guide

    Contact Harry Davies about this story

    Show

    If you have something to share about this story, you can contact Harry using one of the following methods.

    Secure Messaging in the Guardian app

    The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.

    If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

    To send a message to Harry, please choose the ‘UK Investigations’ team.

    Signal Messenger

    You can message Harry using the Signal Messenger app. Use the ‘find by username’ option and type hfd.90

    Email (not secure)

    If you don’t need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email harry.davies@theguardian.com

    SecureDrop and other secure methods

    If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

    Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. 

    Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

    Thank you for your feedback.

    According to Microsoft sources, several employees have in recent months raised concerns internally about ICE’s use of the company’s technology, including by filing internal ethics reports.

    In December 2025, the company responded to one such report by stating that it does not have any current contracts that “support immigration enforcement”. The company later appeared to narrow this position. It acknowledged to employees it has contracts with ICE and DHS, but said it “does not presently maintain AI services contracts tied specifically to enforcement activities”.

    Microsoft is not alone in facing disquiet among employees over its business with federal immigration authorities. For large US tech groups, ICE and sister agency Customs and Border Protection (CBP) have long been customers, but have become increasingly controversial for their aggressive tactics and involvement in fatal shootings.

    Last week, Amazon workers and activists protested outside the company’s Seattle headquarters, demanding the company cut ties with federal immigration agencies. The company benefits from a series of large cloud deals with DHS to provide cloud infrastructure to ICE and CBP.

    At Google, which provides cloud services to both agencies, more than 1,300 workers have signed a recent petition with a similar set of demands. “DHS is violating civil and national law as well as civil and human rights,” the petition reads. “We must end our complicity in powering them.”

    • Beyond the headlines: inside stories from the Guardian’s investigations team. On 16 March, join the Guardian’s investigations team, Paul Lewis, Sirin Kale, Lucy Osborne, David Conn and Harry Davies, for a deep dive into the stories behind some of the Guardian’s biggest headlines. Book tickets here

    Continue Reading